• Nenhum resultado encontrado

Rev. bras. ortop. vol.51 número3

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2018

Share "Rev. bras. ortop. vol.51 número3"

Copied!
10
0
0

Texto

(1)

r e v b r a s o r t o p . 2016;51(3):319–328

SOCIEDADE BRASILEIRA DE ORTOPEDIA E TRAUMATOLOGIA

w w w . r b o . o r g . b r

Original

article

Obstetric

paralysis:

anterior

arthroscopic

release

of

the

shoulder

and

transfer

of

the

latissimus

dorsi

using

a

homologous

graft

Alberto

Naoki

Miyazaki,

Caio

Santos

Checchia

,

Sergio

Luiz

Checchia,

Marcelo

Fregoneze,

Pedro

Doneux

Santos,

Guilherme

do

Val

Sella

FaculdadedeCiênciasMédicasdaSantaCasadeSãoPaulo,SãoPaulo,SP,Brazil

a

r

t

i

c

l

e

i

n

f

o

Articlehistory:

Received19May2015 Accepted18August2015 Availableonline3May2016

Keywords:

Paralysis,obstetric Brachialplexusneuropathy Tendontransfer

Transplantation Homologous Shoulder Arthroscopy

a

b

s

t

r

a

c

t

Objective:Descriptionofanewsurgicaltechniquefortreatingtheshouldersofpatients withsequelaeofobstetricparalysis.Preliminaryanalysisontheresultsobtainedfromthis technique.

Methods:Fiveconsecutivepatientsunderwenttheproposedsurgicalprocedure,consisting ofarthroscopicanteriorjointreleasefollowedbytransferofthelatissimusdorsitendon (elongatedandreinforcedwithahomologoustendongraft)totheposterosuperiorportion ofthegreatertubercle,usingasingledeltopectoralapproach.Allthepatientswere reeval-uatedafteraminimumpostoperativeperiodoftwelvemonths.Thefunctionalassessment wasbasedontherangeofmotionandthemodifiedMalletclassificationsystem.Statistical analyseswerenotpossiblebecauseofthesmallsample.

Results:Overall, passive and active lateral rotations increased, while medial rotation decreased.Theothermovements(elevation,capacitytoplaceahandinthemouthand capacitytoplaceahandbehindtheneck)hadlessconsistentevolution.Themeanmodified Malletscoreimprovedby4.2points(from11.4to15.6).

Conclusion: Thelatissimusdorsitendoncanbetransferredtotheposterosuperiorportionof thegreatertuberclethroughasingledeltopectoralapproachwhenelongatedandreinforced withahomologoustendinousgraft.

©2015SociedadeBrasileiradeOrtopediaeTraumatologia.PublishedbyElsevierEditora Ltda.Allrightsreserved.

StudyconductedattheDepartmentofOrthopedyandTraumatology,FaculdadedeCiênciasMédicasdaSantaCasadeSãoPaulo (DOT-FCMSCSP),SãoPaulo,SP,Brazil.

Correspondingauthor.

E-mail:caio.checchia@gmail.com(C.S.Checchia).

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rboe.2016.04.004

(2)

Paralisia

obstétrica:

liberac¸ão

artroscópica

anterior

do

ombro

e

transferência

do

grande

dorsal

com

enxerto

homólogo

Palavras-chave:

Paralisiaobstétrica

Neuropatiasdoplexobraquial Transferênciatendinosa Transplante

Homólogo Ombro Artroscopia

r

e

s

u

m

o

Objetivos:Descric¸ãodeumanovatécnicacirúrgicaparaotratamentodeombrodepacientes comsequeladeparalisiaobstétrica.Análisepreliminardosresultadosobtidoscomessa técnica.

Métodos:Cincopacientesconsecutivosforamsubmetidosaotratamentocirúrgicoproposto, queenvolvealiberac¸ãoarticularanteriorporviaartroscópica,seguidadatransferênciado tendãodomúsculograndedorsal(alongadoereforc¸adocomenxertotendíneohomólogo) paraaporc¸ãopóstero-superiordotubérculo maior,comousodeumaúnicavia delto-peitoral.Todosforamreavaliadosapósumperíodopós-operatóriomínimode12meses.A avaliac¸ãodafunc¸ãobaseou-senaamplitudedemovimentoenaclassificac¸ãomodificada deMallet.Apequenacasuísticanãopermitiuanálisesestatísticas.

Resultados: Deformageral,asrotac¸õeslateraispassivaeativamelhoraram,enquantoa rotac¸ãomedialpiorou.Osoutrosmovimentos(elevac¸ão,capacidadedecolocac¸ãodamão nabocaecapacidadedecolocac¸ãodamãonanuca)tiveramevoluc¸ãomenosconsistente. AmédiadoescoredeMalletmodificadomelhorou4,2pontos(de11,4para15,6).

Conclusão: Otendãodomúsculograndedorsalpodesertransferidoparaaporc¸ão póstero-superiordotubérculomaiorpormeiodeumaúnicaviadelto-peitoral,quandoalongadoe reforc¸adocomenxertotendíneohomólogo.

©2015SociedadeBrasileiradeOrtopediaeTraumatologia.PublicadoporElsevier EditoraLtda.Todososdireitosreservados.

Introduction

Mostpatients withobstetricalbrachial plexuspalsy (OBPP) sequelaedevelopspontaneous,completeornearlycomplete improvementofshoulderfunction.1–5However,inthosewith incompleterecovery,medialrotationshouldercontractureis oneofthemostcommonsequelae,4,6–9duetomuscle imbal-ance secondary to plexus injury (with a predominance of medialrotatorsoverlateralrotators).Thissequelaoccursearly andcanbefoundinadvancedstagesinpatientsasyoungas2 years.1,3–6,8–13Ifleftuntreated,itcanleadtoaverydebilitating jointdeformitytotheshoulderfunction.6,11

In 1918, Sever14 proposed and described the release of the pectoralis majorand subscapularis.L’Episcopo, in1934 andagainin1939,15,16observingthetendencyofrecurrence ofmedialrotation contractureafterSever procedure, asso-ciatedthis surgeryto the transferof the insertions ofthe latissimus dorsi and teres major muscles from the ante-riormedialportiontotheposterolateralhumerus.Currently, surgicalprocedurescanbedividedintothreegroups:(1) ten-dontransferswithoutanteriorshoulderrelease;(2)anterior releaseoftheshoulder,usuallyaccompaniedbytendon trans-fer;and(3)rescueprocedures,suchashumeralosteotomyor shoulderarthrodesis,typicallyforpatientswithseverejoint deformity.12,17

Thesecondgroupofproceduresiscurrentlyrecommended by most authors for the treatment patients that present withpre-existing medialrotation shouldercontracture,but stillhaveacongruentjoint.2–9,11,18–20 Theanterior shoulder releasemaybeachievedbyopen3,5–7,20–26orarthroscopic sur-gicaltechniques.3,4,8–10Thetendontransfermostcitedinthe

literatureisthatofthelatissimusdorsi(whetherornot accom-panied bythe teres major), so that it will act as a lateral shoulderrotator.2–5,7–9,12,18,19,27 Theattachmentpointofthe transferredtendonwasinitiallydescribedasthelateral cor-texofthehumerus,justbelowthegreatertuberosity,usingthe deltopectoralapproach.15,16Later,inordertopromote abduc-tionimprovement,thetransferwasmodifiedtothe posterosu-periorportionofthegreatertuberosity.18However,toachieve this,itwasnecessarytouseaposteriorapproachormultiple accessroutes.Nostudiesusingonlyananteriorapproachto thisnewtopographywereretrievedintheliterature.

Thisstudyaimedtodescribeanddiscussthesurgical tech-niquedevelopedandusedbyourgroupinfivepatientswith OBPP, whichinvolves:(1)arthroscopic releaseofthe shoul-dertogainpassivelateralrotationand(2)thetransferofthe latissimusdorsi,whereitstendoninsertionislengthenedand reinforced with a tendonallograft so that it can be trans-ferredtotheposterosuperiorportionofthegreatertuberosity throughasingleanteriorsurgicalapproach.

Materials

and

methods

From May2011toJuly2013,fivepatientswithmedial rota-tionshouldercontractureunderwentarthroscopicreleaseand latissimusdorsitendontransferperformedbytheShoulder and Elbow Surgical Group of our institution. The research projectwasapprovedbytheHumanResearchEthics Commit-teeofthesameinstitution.

(3)

rev bras ortop.2016;51(3):319–328

321

Table1–Patientclinicaldata.

Case Age(years) Gender Side Narakasclassification Previousbrachialplexussurgeries

1 18 F R High(Erb) –

2 5 F R High(Erb) Neurolysisat8monthsofage

3 14 F L High(Erb) –

4 4 F L Total Neurotizationat5monthsofage

5 7 M R High(Erb) –

Source:Servicerecords(same).

deformities(i.e.,classifiedasmaximumofgrade3,according totheWaters1classification).

Ofthefivepatients,fourwerefemaleandone(case5)male. Themean age atsurgery was9 years (4–18). According to theWaters1classification,theshouldersofallpatientswere classifiedasgrade1(nojointdeformity).Asforthemodified Narakasclassification,apudSawyer,12fourpatientshadupper brachialplexusinjury(typeI,involvingC5–C6)andonlycase 4hadtotalplexusinjury(typeIII).Cases2and4hadalready

undergonepriorbrachialplexussurgery.Case2underwent aneurolysisateightmonthsoflife;case4,atfivemonths, underwentC5rootneurotizationtotheposteriorcord,C6 neu-rotizationtotheanteriordivisionofthelateralcord,accessory nerveneurotizationtothesuprascapularnerve,andC7root neurotizationtothemiddlestem(Table1).

Forthefunctionalassessment,activeandpassiverangeof motion(ROM)measurementsweremadebyphysicians,with theuseofagoniometer.ShoulderROMsincludedpassive lat-eralrotation(withtheshoulderadducted)andthefollowing activemovements:elevationinthescapularplane,lateraland medialrotation(withtheshoulderadducted),hand-to-mouth, and hand-to-neck. Patients were assessed and classified accordingtothemodifiedMalletscale,apudBaeetal.,28for globalshoulderfunctioninpatientswithOBPP(Fig.1).

All patients underwent pre- and post-operative radio-graphicassessmentinthe trueAP,axillary,and scapularY views.Intwocases(2and3),computedtomographieswere performed.

Themeanpostoperativeoutpatientfollow-uptimewas23 monthsand 15 days (range: 12–49months). Functional re-evaluationof the operatedshoulder was conducted inthe samemannerasthepre-operativeevaluation(Table2).

Duetothesmallnumberofcasesoperatedsofarwiththis technique,theresultswerenotstatisticallyanalyzed.

Surgical

technique

Thefirststepofthesurgery,whichaimstogainpassivelateral rotation(Fig.2),isthearthroscopicrelease,performedwiththe patientundergeneralanesthesiaandinthebeach-chair posi-tion.Withthearthroscope(4-mmdiameter,30-degreeangle) positionedintheposteriorportalandanarthroscopicscissor intheanterior,ananteriorcapsulotomyuntilthefiveo’clock positionisperformed,aswellasatenotomyoftheproximal portionofthesubscapularistendon,whennecessary(Fig.3).

Then,the openmuscletransferismade.Througha del-topectoral approach, the proximal third of the pectoralis majortendonisdetachedandthelatissimusdorsiandteres

majortendonsinsertionsare identified(Fig. 4).Thetendon ofthelatissimusdorsiisrepaired,totallydetachedfromthe humerus,anditsmusclebellyispartiallydissected.Itisthen stretchedandreinforcedwithahomologoustendonfroma tissuebank(Fig.5),whichistrimmedtohavethesamewidth asthepatient’stendonandsufficientlengthtoreachthe pos-terosuperior portionofthegreatertuberosity.Incases1,2, and3,Achillestendonswereused.Incases4and5,patellar tendons.

Thetendon(alreadystretched)ispassedinferiorlytothe teresminorandthelateralheadofthetricepstothe poste-riorportion ofthehumerus. Thisisdonewiththeaid ofa longcurvedclamp,whichispassedbetweenthedeltoidand humeralheadinordertoreachthetendon(Fig.5).Finally,with theshoulderplacedat15◦ ofabductionand60ofrotation,

thetransferissutured(withnonabsorbableNo.5wire)tothe posterosuperiorportionofthegreatertuberosity(Fig.6).

Attheendofsurgery,thepatientisimmobilizedinneutral rotationwithanabductionsling,whichiskeptfull-timefor sixtoeightweeks.Inthisperiod,theslingisremovedonlyfor bathingand fordailyphysicaltherapy,whichinvolvesonly passivelateralrotationshoulderexercises.Afterthisperiod, shoulderROMgain andmaintenanceareinitiated,but still withoutstrengthening.Thelatterisstartedonlyfourmonths aftersurgery.

Results

TheresultsareshowninTable2indetail,whichcomparesthe pre-andpostoperativeROMs(andtheirscoresinthemodified Mallet28 classification) ofeach evaluatedmotion,separated bypatient. Thisallowsforaclearpictureofthefunctional evolutionofeachoperatedshoulder(Table2).

Ingeneral,passiveandactivelateralrotationsimproved, whilemedialrotationgotworse.Othermovements(elevation, hand-to-mouth,andhand-to-neck)presentedlessconsistent evolution.ThemeanmodifiedMalletscore28improvedby4.2 points(11.4–15.6;Table2).

Discussion

(4)

r

e

v

b

r

a

s

o

r

t

o

p

.

2

0

1

6;

5

1(3)

:319–328

Table2–Comparisonofpreoperativevs.postoperativefunction,stratifiedbypatientandmotion.

Case Follow-up (months)

Passivelateralrotation Activelateralrotation Elevation Medialrotation Handtomouth Handtoneck MALLETSCORE

Pre-op Post-op Pre-op Post-op Pre-op Post-op Pre-op Post-op Pre-op Post-op Pre-op Post-op Pre-op Post-op

1 49 30◦ 4510(2) 10(2) 75(3) 80(3) Sacrum(3) Sacrum(3) Marked

trumpet sign(2)

Partial trumpet sign(3)

Not possible (2)

Not possible (2)

13 13

2 26 20◦ 70

−45◦(1) 0◦(2) 90◦(3) 130◦(4) T12(4) Not

possible(2) Marked trumpet sign(2)

<40◦abd

(4)

Not possible (2)

Easy(4) 9 16

3 20 10◦ 80

−5◦(2) 30◦(4) 150◦(4) 140◦(4) T7(5) T7(5) Marked

trumpet sign(2)

Partial trumpet sign(3)

Hard(3) Easy(4) 12 20

4 14 45◦ 90 0(2) 70(4) 90(3) 80(3) Trochanter

(2)

Not possible(2)

Marked trumpet sign(2)

Partial trumpet sign(3)

Not possible (2)

Not possible (2)

8 14

5 12 45◦ 8010(3) 15(4) 80(3) 80(3) T12(4) Gluteus(2) Partial

trumpet sign(3)

Partial trumpet sign(3)

Not possible (2)

Hard(3) 15 15

MEAN 24 30◦ 7310(2) 21(3.2) 97(3.2) 102(3.4) (3.6) (2.8) (2.2) (3.2) (2.2) (3) 11.4 15.6

Source:Servicerecords(same).

(5)

rev bras ortop.2016;51(3):319–328

323

Abduction

Lateral rotation

Medial rotation

Hand-to-neck

Hand-to-mouth

<30º 30º to 90º >90º

<0º 0º to 20º >20º

Not possible

Not possible

Marked trumped sign Partial trumpet sign <40º abduction

T12 S1

Easy Hard

Grade III

Grade IV

Grade II

Fig.1–SchematicrepresentationofthemodifiedMalletclassification28toassessshoulderfunctioninpatientswithOBPP.

GradeI,nofunction;gradeV,functionequaltothecontralateralshoulder.GradesII,III,andIVarerepresentedforeach motion.S1,firstsacralvertebra;T12,12ththoracicvertebra.

developingjointdeformity andthereforewould notbenefit fromthisprocedure.19

Inordertoprovidethemostappropriatetherapeutic indi-cation in each case, radiological assessment is necessary. Inaddition to assessingjoint congruity and deformitiesof the glenoid and humeral head, rated according to Waters classification,1X-raysandcomputedtomographyallowforthe assessmentandmeasurementoftheshapeandversionofthe glenoidjointsurfaceandtheamountofposteriorsubluxation ofthehumeralhead.1,4,9,22 Pedowitzetal.4andKozinetal.9 demonstratedthatmagneticresonanceimagingcanalsobe usedforthis purpose,and isindicated incaseswherethe humeralepiphysisandglenoidarestillcartilaginous.

Regardingthesurgicaltechnique,thearthroscopicrelease usedinthepresentstudyisnotunusual;itwasfirstdescribed byPearl10in2003.Theuseofthearthroscopicapproach(rather

than open) isjustifiedbythe fact that subscapularis teno-tomy isnotalways necessarytoobtainthedesired passive lateralrotation.Bynotperformingatenotomy,intheory,the riskofiatrogeniclateralrotationcontractureisreduced;itcan occurwithotheropensubscapularisstretchingtechniques.10 AsadvocatedbyPearlet al.,8,10 Pedowitzet al.,4 and Kozin etal.,9itisnoteworthythatthereleaseisconsidered incom-plete whenthepassiveexternalrotationachievedwiththe shoulderabductedat90◦islowerthan45(Fig.2).Ifthatisthe

(6)

Fig.2–Case3.Passivelateralrotationoftheleftshoulderbefore(a)andafter(b)thearthroscopicprocedure.

Fig.3–Case2.Viewoftheintra-articularspaceoftherightshoulder,withthearthroscopeintheposteriorportal.

x=humeralhead;y=subscapularistendon.(A)Tenotomyoftheproximalportionofthesubscapularismusclewithapunch. (B)Aftersubscapularistenotomyandanteriorcapsulotomy(arrow).

Regardingthetendontransfer,thefirstaspectconsidered initsdevelopmentwasrelatedtothesurgicalapproach.To makeatendontransferspecificallytotheposteriorsuperior portionofthegreater tuberosity,somesurgeonsuse a sin-gleposteriorapproach,2,3,9,18asingleaxillaryapproach,20an anteriorapproach(deltopectoral)associatedwithaposterior approach,26orasaber-cutapproachassociatedtoaposterior approach.29,30Noarticlesdescribingthetendontransfertothe describedsiteusingthetechniquedescribedinthepresent study (asingleanterior accessroute)were retrieved inthe literature.

Thedeltopectoralapproachwaschosenforitsadvantages when compared to other approaches, which are: orthope-dicsurgeonsfamiliarity;noviolationofthedeltoidmuscle; allows, when necessary, the osteotomy of the dysplastic

coracoidprocess12,20andelongationofthetendonsofthe pec-toralismajor,shortheadofthebiceps,andcoracobrachialis7; andallowsthedetachmentofthetendonsofthelatissimus dorsi and teres majorundergood viewing,31 which,in the authors’opinion,reducestheriskofiatrogenicinjurytothe axillary nerve.However,the anterior approachhasthe fol-lowing disadvantages:in the authors’opinion, greater risk ofiatrogenic injurytothe radialnerve (it cannotbeeasily identified, despitebeing verynearthe surgicalsite[Fig. 4]); and theimpossibilityofawidedissectionofthelatissimus dorsi and teres major muscles, which does not allow for their traction tothe posterosuperior portionof the greater tuberosity.

(7)

rev bras ortop.2016;51(3):319–328

325

Fig.4–Schematicrepresentationoftherightshoulder. Anteriorview.Thedeltoidmuscleisnotshown.(1)Long headofthebiceps;(2)subscapularistendon;(3)insertionof theconjointtendonandthepectoralisminortendoninto thecoracoidprocess(musclesarenotshown);(4)axillary nerve;(5)radialnerve;(6)teresmajortendon;(7)latissimus dorsitendon(sectioned);and(8)humeralinsertionofthe pectoralismajormuscle(muscleisnotshown).

wereaddedtothetechnique:(1)arthroscopicaljointrelease (whichhas already been described and discussed); and (2) tendonlengtheningandstrengtheningwithagraft,toallow thefixationofthelatissimusdorsitotheposteriorsuperior

aspect ofthe greater tuberosity,which intheory would be biomechanically morefavorable.In thepresent cases, allo-graftsofcalcanealorpatellartendonswereused,astheywere consideredtobesufficientlystrongandwide.Allograftscould also beusedin order tostrengthen tendontransfer. Thus, theauthorsbelievethatitispossibletomaintainthepatient withonlyafunctionalslingandwithoutrigidthoracobrachial immobilization(plasterororthosis).

Another important aspect taken into consideration in the development ofthe techniquewas whatwould be the biomechanically best anatomicalsite forthetendon trans-fer attachment. Reviewing the literature, two trends were identified:(1)someauthors5–8,19usethelateralcortexofthe humerus, justbelowthegreater tuberosity,thesame place suggestedbytheL’Episcopotechnique16;(2)others2–4,9,18,20,26 usetheposterosuperiorportionofthegreatertuberosity(oron therotatorcuffitself),accordingtothetechniquedescribed byHofferetal.18 Thedifferenceintheprinciplebehindthe twotechniquesliesinthevectorsoftheforcesgeneratedby thetransferredmusculotendinousunits.Inthefirstgroup,the transferactsonlyasalateralrotatoroftheshoulder,whilein the secondgroup, inadditiontoactingasalateral rotator, ittheoreticallyallowsforgainsinshoulderabduction,which isoneofthecompromisedmovementsinpatientswithOBPP sequelae.AccordingtoHofferetal.,18thisisbecauseatransfer madetotheposterosuperiorportionofthegreater tuberos-ityincreasesthestabilizingeffectoftherotatorcuffandthus enablesthedeltoidtobemoreeffectiveasashoulder abduc-tor.However,itisworthdiscussingwhetherthistheoretical differenceisabletopromoteachangeinclinicaloutcomes.

Intheanalysisofresultsobtainedintheliterature,itwas observedthatseveralstudies(regardlessoflocationoftendon transfer)reportedimprovedlateralshoulderrotationformost patients.2,3,5,6,8,9,18–20,26However,thesamecouldnotbesaid forabductiongains.Ofthestudiesthatusedtransfertothe

(8)

Fig.6–Schematicrepresentation(a)andintraoperativephotograph(case1)(b)rightshoulder.Anteriorview.Arrows:siteof transfersutureattheposteriorsuperioraspectofthegreatertuberosity.

Pre-operative

a

b

c

d

Pre-operative

Post-operative

Post-operative

(9)

rev bras ortop.2016;51(3):319–328

327

lateralcortexofthe humerus,improvedamplitude ofsuch motionformostpatientswasonlyobservedinthestudiesby Coveyetal.19and byWickstrometal.6 However,abduction improvedinallstudiesinwhichthetransferwasmadetothe posterosuperiorportionofthegreatertuberosity.2,3,9,18,20,26

Specificallyinrelationtotheimprovementofshoulder ele-vationinthescapularplane,presentedresultsarelesserthan expected(Table 2). Although bothtendon transferand the useofagraftdecreasethestrengthofthetransferredmuscle group,theauthorsbelievethattheincreaseineffectivenessof thedeltoidasanabductorafterthetransferofthelatissimus dorsitotheposterosuperiorportionofthegreatertuberosity18 occursmoreduetothetenodesiseffectofthetransferthanto activemusclecontraction,asproposedGerberetal.29,30and byNové-Josserandetal.32Therefore,theadditionofatendon graftwouldnotaffectthefunctionaloutcome.However,only case2presentedimprovementsofsuchmotion(Table2),while intheotherfouritwasvirtuallyunchanged(Table2). Consid-ering this fact, the authors believe that the lifting motion canbefurtherimprovedinfuturecasesifthesutureofthe bonetransferismadewiththeshoulderatagreaterdegree of abduction, which would provide higher tension to the transfer.

Improvementinlateralrotationwasexpected,asthe find-ingswere similartothosefoundinotherseries.5 Thiswas observed withthe improvementin active and passive lat-eralrotation,whichwasachievedinfouroutoffivepatients (Table2).Otherfindingsthatcorroboratethistheorywerethe improvement(also inalmostevery case)ofhand-to-mouth andhand-to-neckmovements(Table2),becausethe move-ment of bringing the hand to the face without the need ofshoulderabductionrequiresactivelateralrotationofthe shoulder.11,33Inclinicalpractice,alesspronouncedtrumpet signtranslatesintoanimprovementoftheactivelateral rota-tionability(Fig.7).

Fullopensubscapularistenotomy,intheory,leadsto reduc-tion inactivemedialrotationability. Theproximalportion ofthe subscapularis tendon can be accessed and undergo intra-articulartenotomythrougharthroscopy.4,8–10This ten-donportionispreciselytheonethatZancolliandZancolli7 believe to be the most shortened. Therefore, arthroscopic surgerytheoreticallyprovidesalateralrotationgain(through thereleaseoftheshortenedportionofthetendon)without causingthelossofactivemedialrotation,asitwould main-tainthedistalportionofthesubscapularisintact.Thestudy byKozinetal.9reinforcesthisthesisbyreportingnochanges inmedialrotationabilityafterarthroscopicpartial subscapu-larisrelease.However,Pearletal.,8 inastudy publishedin 2006,demonstrated that their patients had significant loss ofthismotionafterundergoingthesamearthroscopic surgi-caltechnique.Ourexperienceyieldedmixedresults.Intwo cases, the medialrotation was unchanged.In three, it got worse.

Despitethesmallnumberofpatientsinthepresent stud-ies,and in lightof the results, the authors believe that it ispossibletoimprove upperlimbfunctioninthis groupof patientsusingthesurgicaltechniquedescribed.Itis impor-tanttomentionthatthe limbfunctioninthesepatients is extremely precarious, and any percentageof improvement cangreatlybenefittheirdailyactivities.

Conclusion

Thelatissimusdorsimuscletendoncanbetransferredtothe posterosuperiorportion ofthegreater tuberosity througha singledeltopectoralaccesswhenlengthened withatendon allograft.

Conflicts

of

interest

Theauthorsdeclarenoconflictsofinterest.

r

e

f

e

r

e

n

c

e

s

1.WatersPM,SmithGR,JaramilloD.Glenohumeraldeformity secondarytobrachialplexusbirthpalsy.JBoneJointSurgAm. 1998;80(5):668–77.

2.PagnottaA,HaerleM,GilbertA.Long-termresultson abductionandexternalrotationoftheshoulderafter latissimusdorsitransferforsequelaeofobstetricpalsy.Clin OrthopRelatRes.2004;426:199–205.

3.WatersPM,BaeDS.Effectoftendontransfersand extra-articularsoft-tissuebalancingonglenohumeral developmentinbrachialplexusbirthpalsy.JBoneJointSurg Am.2005;87(2):320–5.

4.PedowitzDI,GibsonB,WilliamsGR,KozinSH.Arthroscopic treatmentofposteriorglenohumeraljointsubluxation resultingfrombrachialplexusbirthpalsy.JShoulderElbow Surg.2007;16(1):6–13.

5.CabralJRD,CrepaldiBE,SambuyMTC,CostaACD,Abdouni YA,ChakkourI.Avaliac¸ãodafunc¸ãodomembrosuperiornos pacientescomparalisiaobstétricaapóscirurgiade

Sever-L’piscopomodificada.RevBrasOrtop.2012;47(4):451–4.

6.WickstromJ,HaslamEtHutchinsonRH.Thesurgical managementofresidualdeformitiesoftheshoulder followingbirthinjuriesofthebrachialplexus.JBoneJoint SurgAm.1955;37(1):27–36.

7.ZancolliEA,ZancolliERJr.Palliativesurgicalproceduresin sequelaeofobstetricpalsy.HandClin.1988;4(4):643–69.

8.PearlML,EdgertonBW,KazimiroffPA,BurchetteRJ,WongK. Arthroscopicreleaseandlatissimusdorsitransferfor shoulderinternalrotationcontracturesandglenohumeral deformitysecondarytobrachialplexusbirthpalsy.JBone JointSurgAm.2006;88(3):564–74.

9.KozinSH,BoardmanMJ,ChafetzRS,WilliamsGR,HanlonA. Arthroscopictreatmentofinternalrotationcontractureand glenohumeraldysplasiainchildrenwithbrachialplexusbirth palsy.JShoulderElbowSurg.2010;19(1):102–10.

10.PearlML.Arthroscopicreleaseofshouldercontracture secondarytobirthpalsy:anearlyreportonfindingsand surgicaltechnique.Arthroscopy.2003;19(6):577–82.

11.WatersPM.Updateonmanagementofpediatricbrachial plexuspalsy.JPediatrOrthopB.2005;14(4):233–44.

12.SawyerJR.Paralyticd.In:CanaleST,BeatyJH,editors. Campbell’soperativeorthopaedics.12ed.Philadelphia: MosbyElsevier;2013.p.1255–333.

13.VieiraLAG,PoderosoMA,Gonc¸alvesMCK,HissadomiMI, BenegasE,FerreiraNetoAA,etal.Aosteotomiade centralizac¸ãodacabec¸aumeral,naluxac¸ãoposteriordo ombro,seqüeladeparalisiaobstétrica.RevBrasOrtop. 2004;39(11/12):661–9.

14.SeverJW.Theresultsofanewoperationforobstetrical paralysis.AmJOrthopSurg.1918;16:248–57.

(10)

16.L’EpiscopoJB.Restorationofmusclebalanceinthetreatment ofobstetricalparalysis.NYStateJMed.1939;39:357.

17.LopesEI,ChakkourI,GomesMD,CauchiolliCA,RamirezJFG, LopesFilhoJD.Osteotomiaderotac¸ãoexternadoúmerono tratamentodasdeformidadesemrotac¸ãointernadoombro nasseqüelasdeparalisiaobstétrica.RevBrasOrtop. 1996;31(4):322–6.

18.HofferMM,WickendenR,RoperB.Brachialplexusbirth palsies:resultsoftendontransferstotherotatorcuff.JBone JointSurgAm.1978;60(5):691–5.

19.CoveyDC,RiordanDC,MilsteadME,AlbrightJA.Modification oftheL’Episcopoprocedureforbrachialplexusbirthpalsies.J BoneJointSurgBr.1992;74(6):897–901.

20.PhippsGJ,HofferMM.Latissimusdorsiandteresmajor transfertorotatorcuffforErb’palsy.JShoulderElbowSurg. 1995;4(2):124–9.

21.GilbertA,BrockmanR,CarliozH.Surgicaltreatmentof brachialplexusbirthpalsy.ClinOrthopRelatRes. 1991;264:39–47.

22.PearlML,EdgertonBW.Glenoiddeformitysecondaryto brachialplexusbirthpalsy.JBoneJointSurgAm. 1998;80(5):659–67.

23.GiostriGS,MacheziniEJ,PasinAP.Rotac¸ãointernana paralisiaobstétrica:comparac¸ãodosresultadosdos

procedimentosdeSever-L’Episcopoeosteotomiaderrotadora doúmero.RevBrasOrtop.1996;31(1):33–5.

24.ChuangDC,MaHS,WeiFC.Anewstrategyofmuscle transpositionfortreatmentofshoulderdeformitycausedby obstetricbrachialplexuspalsy.PlastReconstrSurg. 1998;101(3):686–94.

25.WatersPM,PeljovichAE.Shoulderreconstructioninpatients withchronicbrachialplexusbirthpalsy:acase–controlstudy. ClinOrthopRelatRes.1999;(364):144–52.

26.OzbenH,AtalarAC,BilselK,DemirhanM.Transferof latissmusdorsiandteresmajortendonswithout

subscapularisreleaseforthetreatmentofobstetricalbrachial plexuspalsysequela.JShoulderElbowSurg.

2011;20(8):1265–74.

27.SantosC,PereiraA,PintoRR,TrigueirosM,LemosR,SilvaC. Cirurgiapaliativadoombroemparalisiaobstétricadoplexo braquial.RevIberamCirMano.2010;38(1):25–30.

28.BaeDS,WatersPM,ZurakowskiD.Reliabilityofthree classificationsystemsmeasuringactivemotioninbrachial plexusbirthpalsy.JBoneJointSurgAm.2003;85A(9): 1733–8.

29.GerberC,VinhTS,HertelR,HessCW.Latissimusdorsi transferforthetreatmentofmassivetearsoftherotatorcuff: apreliminaryreport.ClinOrthopRelatRes.1988;(232): 51–61.

30.GerberC.Latissimusdorsitransferforthetreatmentof irreparabletearsoftherotatorcuff.ClinOrthopRelatRes. 1992;(275):152–60.

31.BoileauP,ChuinardC,RoussanneY,NeytonL,TrojaniC. Modifiedlatissimusdorsiandteresmajortransferthrougha singledelto-pectoralapproachforexternalrotationdeficitof theshoulder:asanisolatedprocedureorwithareverse arthroplasty.JShoulderElbowSurg.2007;16(6):671–82.

32.Nové-JosserandL,CostaP,LiotardJP,SafarJF,WalchG,Zilber S.Resultsoflatissimusdorsitendontransferforirreparable cufftears.OrthopTraumatolSurgRes.2009;95(2):

108–13.

Imagem

Table 1 – Patient clinical data.
Fig. 1 – Schematic representation of the modified Mallet classification 28 to assess shoulder function in patients with OBPP.
Fig. 2 – Case 3. Passive lateral rotation of the left shoulder before (a) and after (b) the arthroscopic procedure.
Fig. 4 – Schematic representation of the right shoulder.
+2

Referências

Documentos relacionados

Portanto, tendo em vista a carência de estudos com mariposas no Brasil, sobretudo na região Sudeste, e a partir dos resultados obtidos pelo presente estudo, pôde-se inferir que

Foram analisadas 840 amostras de águas subterrâneas, provenientes dos principais sistemas aquíferos (Cristalino, Tubarão, Guarani, Serra Geral, Bauru e Taubaté)

In this context, this study aimed to (1) describe qualitatively and quantitatively the spatial segregation between the two populations and (2) access which potential

O estudo “Relação entre Transtornos Mentais durante a gestação, Baixo Peso ao Nascer e Pre- maturidade: Estudo com gestantes assistidas na Atenção Básica” é produto de

Low birth weight and prematurity was observed in 14 and 19 new- borns, respectively, and there was no association with the probable diagnosis of mental disorders; the

This study was designed to describe a surgical technique that involves paraspinal- approach reduction and fi xation (PARF) and to evaluate the outcome of TLBF managed with

The goal of this study was to describe the clinical and the epidemiological proile of patients with intestinal obstruction submitted to emergency surgical treatment in a high