h tt p : / / w w w . b j m i c r o b i o l . c o m . b r /
Biotechnology
and
Industry
Microbiology
Biopharmaceuticals
from
microorganisms:
from
production
to
purification
Angela
Faustino
Jozala
a,
Danilo
Costa
Geraldes
b,
Louise
Lacalendola
Tundisi
b,
Valker
de
Araújo
Feitosa
c,
Carlos
Alexandre
Breyer
d,
Samuel
Leite
Cardoso
e,
Priscila
Gava
Mazzola
f,
Laura
de
Oliveira-Nascimento
f,g,
Carlota
de
Oliveira
Rangel-Yagui
c,
Pérola
de
Oliveira
Magalhães
h,
Marcos
Antonio
de
Oliveira
d,
Adalberto
Pessoa
Jr
c,∗aUniversidadedeSorocaba(UNISO),DepartamentodeTecnologiaeProcessoAmbiental,Sorocaba,SP,Brazil
bUniversidadedeCampinas(UNICAMP),InstitutodeBiologia,ProgramadePós-Graduac¸ãoemBiociênciaseTecnologiadeprodutos bioativos,Campinas,SP,Brazil
cUniversidadedeSãoPaulo,DepartamentodeBioquímicaeTecnologiaFarmacêutica,SãoPaulo,SP,Brazil dUniversidadeEstadualdeSãoPaulo(UNESP),InstitutodeBiociências,CampusdoLitoralPaulista,SP,Brazil
eUniversidadedeBrasília,FaculdadedeCiênciasdaSaúde,ProgramadePós-Graduac¸ãoemCiênciasFarmacêuticas,Brasília,DF,Brazil fUniversidadeEstadualdeCampinas,FaculdadedeCiênciasFarmacêuticas,Campinas,SP,Brazil
gUniversidadeEstadualdeCampinas,InstitutodeBiologia,DepartamentodeBioquímicaeBiologiaTecidual,Campinas,SP,Brazil hUniversidadedeBrasília,FaculdadedeCiênciasdaSaúde,DepartamentodeFarmácia,Brasília,DF,Brazil
a
r
t
i
c
l
e
i
n
f
o
Articlehistory:
Received6September2016 Accepted22September2016 Availableonline26October2016 AssociateEditor:NelsonDurán
Keywords: Biopharmaceuticals Fermentationprocess Biotechnology Upstreamprocess Downstreamprocess
a
b
s
t
r
a
c
t
Theuseofbiopharmaceuticalsdatesfromthe19thcenturyandwithin5–10years,upto 50%ofall drugsindevelopmentwill bebiopharmaceuticals.In the1980s,the biophar-maceuticalindustryexperiencedasignificantgrowthintheproductionandapprovalof recombinantproteinssuchasinterferons(IFN␣,,and␥)andgrowthhormones.The pro-ductionofbiopharmaceuticals,knownasbioprocess,involvesawiderangeoftechniques.In thisreview,wediscussthetechnologyinvolvedinthebioprocessanddescribetheavailable strategiesandmainadvancesinmicrobialfermentationandpurificationprocesstoobtain biopharmaceuticals.
©2016SociedadeBrasileiradeMicrobiologia.PublishedbyElsevierEditoraLtda.Thisis anopenaccessarticleundertheCCBY-NC-NDlicense(http://creativecommons.org/
licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
∗ Correspondingauthor.
E-mail:pessoajr@usp.br(A.PessoaJr).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjm.2016.10.007
1517-8382/©2016SociedadeBrasileiradeMicrobiologia.PublishedbyElsevierEditoraLtda.ThisisanopenaccessarticleundertheCC BY-NC-NDlicense(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
Introduction
Biopharmaceuticalsaremostlytherapeuticrecombinant pro-teinsobtainedbybiotechnologicalprocesses.Theyarederived frombiologicalsourcessuchasorgansandtissues, microor-ganisms, animal fluids, or genetically modified cells and organisms.1,2 Althoughseveraldifferentexpressionsystems may beemployedincluding mammaliancell lines, insects, and plants, new technological advancements are contin-uously being made to improve microorganism production of biopharmaceuticals. This investment is justified by the well-characterized genomes, versatility ofplasmid vectors, availabilityofdifferenthoststrains,cost-effectivenessas com-paredwithotherexpressionsystems.2,3
Bioprocessingisacrucialpartofbiotechnology.Thereisan anticipationthatwithinthenext5to10years,upto50%ofall drugsindevelopmentwillbebiopharmaceuticals.Examples includerecombinantproteinsobtainedthroughmicrobial fer-mentationprocess.2,3 Bioprocessing forbiopharmaceuticals productioninvolvesawiderangeoftechniques.Inthisreview, wedescribethemainadvancesinmicrobialfermentationand purificationprocesstoobtainbiopharmaceuticals.
Biopharmaceuticalsandthepharmaceuticalindustry Drugdevelopmentisan extremelycomplex and expensive process. According to the Tufts Center for the Study of DrugDevelopment4(http://www.csdd.tufts.edu),itmaytake approximately 15 years of intense research from the ini-tial idea to the final product and development and costs usually exceed $2 billion. Low-molecular mass molecules aregenerically namedasdrugswhilehigh-molecular mass drugs,whicharerepresentedbypolymersofnucleotides(RNA or DNA)or aminoacids (peptidesand proteins), are called biopharmaceuticals.5 Biopharmaceuticals based in nucleic acids,suchassmallinterferingRNA(siRNA),DNAvaccines, andgenetherapy,areverypromisingstrategies.However, clin-icalprotocols wereapprovedonlyvery recently6 andjust a fewnucleicacids-baseddrugshavebeentherapeuticallyused todate7andrecentreviewsaddressedthestateoftheartof nucleicacidsintherapies.8,9Inthisreview,wefocusedon pep-tidesandproteinsbecausetheyrepresentthemajorclassof biopharmaceuticals.10
Theuseofproteinsasdrugshasbeenhighlightedmainly bythehighversatilityofthesebiomolecules,whichhave dif-ferent physiological roles in the human body including as catalysts,receptors,membranechannels,macromolecule car-riers,andcellulardefenseagents.10,11Someproteintherapies providehigh specificity, suchasreplacement ofapatient’s defective protein or evenfulfill its absence due to genetic defectsorimmunologicalcomplications.10
Biopharmaceuticals:reference,biosimilars,andbiobetters Itisworthemphasizingthatthesamegeneproduct,which encodestheidenticalaminoacidsequence,couldbeobtained byextractionfromananimaltissueorbyrecombinantDNA techniques. However,thesame protein producedby differ-entmanufacturerspresentdifferentcharacteristics.Inorder
to differentiate the products, the first biopharmaceutical version ofthesame therapeuticproteinisset asthe refer-encemedicine,whereasthefollowingonesaredenominated biosimilars. Biosimilars may present differences because ofpost-translational modifications (phosphorylation, glyco-sylation) and different manufacturing processes. The term biobetter,alsonamedbiosuperiors,wasrecentlyusedtorefer totherapeuticmacromoleculesofthenextgeneration,which present more effective drug delivery system, are modified by chemical methods (e.g., PEGylation) and/or engineered bymeansofmolecularbiologytechniquestopresentbetter pharmacologicpropertiessuchashigheractivity,enhanced stability, fewerside effects, and lower immunogenicity.12,13 Therefore, while a biosimilar represents a generic version of the original biopharmaceutical, biobetters need original research and development and the costs are significantly higher.14
Additionally,whilethefirstbiopharmaceuticalswere pre-dominantlydeliveredbyinjections,biobettersadoptdifferent approaches todrugdeliveryadministrationasoral, derma-tological and inhaled formulations which are related with differentencapsulationapproachesaimingtominimizethe biologicinstabilitycausedbyproteinaggregationand dena-turation as consequence of physicochemical modifications processes of the biodrug as deamination, hydrolysis, oxi-dation, among others.15 Protein engineering and rational modificationisalsoaverypromisingareainnew biopharma-ceuticalsandsomeaspectswillbediscussedlater.
Theuseofbiopharmaceuticalshasgrownworldwideinthe lastfewyears.In2016,thetotalnumberofproductsapproved bytheFoodsandDrugsAdministration(FDA)andEuropean MedicinesAgency(EMA)foruseinhumansreached1357,of which>130havedifferentformulations(referenceproducts), 737are biosimilars,andtheremaining482areclassifiedas biobetters16(http://www.biopharma.com).From2013to2016, 73 biopharmaceuticals were approved for use in humans. Among them, high prominence was given to monoclonal antibodies (23 approvals)widely used inseveral diagnostic procedures,treatmentofinflammatorydiseases,and neoplas-tictumors16(http://www.biopharma.com).
Inaddition,theEuropeanMedicineAgency(EMA)licensed two new products based on gene therapy (insertion of a corrective gene able to produce a normal protein in the patient’sgenometocureageneticdisease)foruseinhuman therapeutic protocols.These productswere Glybera, devel-oped by the German company UniQure for the treatment oflipoproteinlipasedeficiency,andStrimvelis,developedby GlaxoSmithKline(GSK)forthetreatmentofadenosine deam-inasedeficiency.17Althoughbiopharmaceuticalscanbevery effectivefordiseasecontrolorcure,treatmentcostscanreach upto$1millionperpatient.18
Biobettersbasedinproteinstructureengineering
Oneofthemostpromisingareas ofthe biobettersreliesin proteinstructureengineeringaimingthedevelopmentof bio-drugswithbetterpharmacologicalpropertiesincludinghigher activity,fewerside effects,and lower immunogenicity.The breakthroughinthedeterminationofproteinstructuresand their useas medicinesdatesfrom 1980sasaconsequence
of the advances in recombinant DNA technology. In turn, structuralbiochemistryhasrevolutionizedour understand-ingofproteinbiologyandaffordedthebeginningofprotein engineeringprocessesthatcancreateproteindrugsthatare moreeffective thanwild typeproteins.Proteinengineering mayincreasecatalyticactivity,stability,lower immunogenic-ity,andsusceptibilitytoproteolyticprocesses.11,19–21
Protein engineering involves manipulating the protein sequence at the molecular level in order to change its function. Themost common manipulations in the protein sequencearebasepaircutsandexchanges.However,changes in protein structure caused by oxidation or irreversible reductionofdisulfides are alsoconsidered.Onefactorthat contributeddecisivelytoproteinengineeringwasthe develop-mentoftechniquesthatallowthedeterminationofproteins three-dimensional structure at the atomic level. Among these techniques, more emphasis is given to X-ray crys-tallography because of its high resolution (reaching<1 ˚A). Morerecently,nuclearmagneticresonance(NMR)and Cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM) have also gained space as alternativetechniquesforsolvingstructures.22
Genemanipulation(e.g.,codonreplacement)bymolecular biologyisabletomodifyproteinstructureinaspecificmanner. Amongthe severaltechniquesusedforgenemanipulation, wehighlightsite-directedmutagenesis(SDM).Thistechnique allows rational protein engineering based on its three-dimensionalstructure.23,24UsingSDM,onecanreplace,delete, orinsertoneormoreaminoacidsinthesequenceofaprotein. Examplesincludetheinsertionofpost-translational modifi-cationsites(glycosylation,acetylation,phosphorylation,etc.), enhancementofkineticcharacteristicsbymodificationofthe activesiteenvironment,and modificationofprotein aggre-gation paths.25–28 (Fig. 1) Biobetters generated by protein engineering and gene manipulation may present superior characteristicsoverthereferencebiopharmaceuticaland rep-resentsthemajorgrowingclassamongbiopharmaceuticals.
Thereferencerecombinant proteinisexpressed inhigh amountsandthemolecularstructureisdeterminedatatomic levels (crystallography or NMR). Afterwards, the protein is analyzed using bioinformatic tools and regions of interest areidentified.AftergenemanipulationbySDM,themodified recombinantprotein(biobetter)isobtained.
Upstream
processing
on
biopharmaceuticals
production
Themanufacturing technology forbiopharmaceuticals can be divided into up- and downstream processes (Fig. 2). Upstreamprocessisdefinedasthemicrobialgrowthrequired to produce biopharmaceuticals or other biomolecules and involves a series of events including the selection of cell line, culture media, growth parameters, and process opti-mizationtoachieve optimalconditionsforcellgrowth and biopharmaceuticalproduction.Themaingoaloftheupstream processisthetransformationofsubstratesintothedesired metabolicproducts.29Thisrequireswell-controlledconditions andinvolvestheuseoflarge-scalebioreactors.Severalfactors shouldbeconsideredsuchasthetypeofprocess(batch, fed-batch,continuous,etc.)temperature,pH,andoxygensupply
High amounts of target by heterologous expression
3D structure determination
Structural analysis at atomic level (binding sites, aggregation paths,
Rational modification by SDM
Protein with superior characteristics (Biobetter)
Negatively charged path Uncharged
path
Fig.1–Pipelineofproteinengineeringtoobtainbiobetters.
Theproteinisrepresentedbymolecularsurfaceand
colorizedbycoulombicforces(blue=positive,
red=negative,andwhite=neutral).
control,sterilizationofmaterialsandequipmentemployed, andmaintenanceoftheenvironmenttoensureitisfreeof contaminatingmicroorganisms.30
Biopharmaceuticalsproducedbymicroorganisms Bacteria
The use of protein biopharmaceuticals in human health datesfromthe19thcenturywiththeuseofdiphtheria anti-toxin therapy.31 The antidote consistsof immunoglobulins extracted from the serum ofimmunized animalsthat rec-ognizeandneutralizethetoxin(e.g.,horseorsheep).31,32 In fact,severalantitoxinsareavailabletotreatenvenomationby snakes,scorpions,andwasps,orinfections.However,theuse ofnon-humananimalantibodiescancausehypersensitivity ofthepatienttotheanimalserum,whichisknownasserum sickness.33
Culture at –80ºC
Plate or Stock Flask
Inoculum preparation
Production bioreactor
Centrifugation or filtration
(cell harvesting) Precipitation and/or liquid liquidextraction
Low resolution purification steps
Final biophameceutical Quality control and packaging Liofilization Formulation: (Protein + Buffer + Salt + Protectants)
High resolution purification steps
Diafiltration Viral filtration Polishing cromatography Viral inactivation Cromatography
Fig.2–Thebiopharmaceuticalmanufacturingtechnologyflowchartexemplifyingtheupstreamandthedownstream
bioprocess.
The20thcenturyexperiencedtheuseofseveralmolecules comingfromanimalsourcessuchasinsulin,growthhormone (GH),glucagon,and asparaginase.34–36 However,the discov-eryofthepriondiseasesrelatedtotheadministrationofhGH revealedanotherpotentialriskassociatedwithnon-human animal proteins. This reinforced the need for the produc-tionofproteinpharmaceuticalsfromothersources.37Atthis time,thebiopharmaceuticalindustrylookedatheterologous expressionofproteindrugsbymeansofrecombinantDNA techniquesinmicroorganisms.38
Withtheadvancesofmolecularbiologyandrecombinant DNA, human proteins could be obtained by heterologous expressionusingEscherichiacoli,aswellasotherbacteria.The classicexampleishumaninsulin,whichisusedtotreat dia-betesmellitustypesIandII(DMIandDMII).Initially,insulin was purifiedfrom the extracts ofbovineand porcine pan-creas.However,theprocesswasexpensiveandmanycasesof immuneresponsescausedbyanimalinsulininpatientswere reported10,39Thehumaninsulingenewasthenisolatedand thehumanproteincouldbeobtainedbyheterologous expres-sionusingE.coli(Fig.3).
Filamentousfungi
The great diversity of molecules produced by filamentous fungi justifies the exploitation ofthese organisms. In par-ticular, the isolation and identification of taxol-producing endophyticfungiisanewandfeasibleapproachtothe pro-duction of this antineoplasticdrug. The development and useoftaxol-producingfungihavemadesignificantprogress worldwide.40 Taxol was produced by Fusarium oxysporum grown in potato dextrose broth. In addition, the filamen-tousfungusAspergillusnigerisolatedfromTaxuscuspidatewas foundtoproducetaxol.41
Extracellularenzymesproducedbyfilamentousfungihave alsobeenexplored.-d-galactosidase(lactase–EC.3.2.123)is theenzymeresponsibleforthecatalysisoflactosetoglucose
andgalactose.Globalmarketforlactasehasbeenincreasing significantlyduetoitsimportanceinlactoseintolerance treat-ment.Lactaseismarketedintabletorcapsulestobeusedasa foodsupplementforindividualsintoleranttolactosebefore the intake of milkor dairy products.42,43 Lactase also par-ticipatesinthegalactooligosaccharides(GOS)synthesiswith applicationsinfunctionalfoodssuchaslow-caloriefoodsand asanadditiveinfermenteddairyproducts,breads,anddrinks. GOS,agroupofoligosaccharides,arenotdigestibleand are beneficialtothehumanoranimalbody.ThebenefitsofGOS ingestionarisefromapopulationofbifidobacteriainthecolon thatsuppresstheactivityofputrefactivebacteriaandreduce theformationoftoxicfermentationproducts,avoiding intesti-nalconstipationandincreasingtheproductionofvitaminsB complex.44,45
Another biological drug of importance in fungi is the asparaginaseenzyme.Thisenzymeisusedforthetreatment ofselectedtypesofhematopoieticdiseasessuchasacute lym-phoblasticleukemiaandnon-Hodgkinlymphoma.Astumor cellsaredependentontheexogenoussupplyofasparaginefor theirproliferation,thepresenceofthedrug,whichdepletes thebloodstreamfromasparagine,causesitsselectivedeath. However,thedrug,whichisobtainedfromE.coli(ELSPARTM) andErwiniachrysanthemi,causessevereimmunological reac-tions.Thus,thefungienzymecouldprovideanalternativeto thebacterialenzymesasananti-tumoralagentasitpresents stabilityandoptimumpHnearphysiologicalconditions.
Li et al. (2015)46 demonstrated the production of a moleculewithantifungalactivityagainstastrainofCytospora chrysosperma by submerged fermentation in a shaker. The activecompoundwasobtainedbyextractioninorganic sol-vents,liquidchromatography,andthin-layerchromatography. Svahnetal.(2015)47producedandisolatedamphotericinBby usingastrainofPenicilliumnalgiovenseisolatedfrom Antarc-tica.ItwasthefirsttimethatamphotericinBwasisolatedfrom adifferentorganismasitisusuallyisolatedfromStreptomyces
Human insulin gene Bacterial plasmid
Recombinant plasmid
Bacterial transformation and heterologous expression
Protein purification (recombinant insulin)
Fig.3–Recombinantproteinproduction.Using
recombinantDNAtechniques,thetargethumangenecan
beisolatedandligatedtoavector(plasmid).Theplasmid
containingthehumangeneisusedtotransformbacterial
cells,whichareabletoproducehighamountsofthe
recombinantprotein.
nodosus.AmphotericinBalsoshowedaminimuminhibitory concentrationof0.125mg/mLagainstCandidaalbicans.
Collagenolytic proteases (KollagenaseTM) have been directly used in clinical therapy, including woundhealing, sciaticainherniatedintervertebraldiscs,retainedplacenta, and asa pretreatment forenhancing adenovirus-mediated cancergene therapy.48 Another alkalineprotease with col-lagenolyticactivity was produced byA. nigerLCF9 and the enzyme hydrolyzed various collagen types without amino acidreleaseandliberatedlowmolecularweightpeptidesof potentialtherapeuticuse.49
Carrezetal.(1990)50detectedthepresenceofinterleukin-6 upto25ng/mLinamodifiedstrainofA.nidulansexpressing thehumaninterleukin-6.Yearslater,Yadwadandcolleagues
Table1–Biopharmaceuticalsobtainedfromfilamentous fungi.
Compound Organism
Taxol Taxomycesandrenae
Beta-galactosidase A.foetidus
Lovastatin Monascusrubber,
A.terreus
l-asparaginase A.terreus
Ergotalkaloids Clavicepspurpurea
Griseofulvin P.griseofulvum
Proteases Aspergillussp
Penicilliumsp
AmphotericinB Penicilliumnalgiovense
(1996)51 producedapproximately54mg/Lofinterleukin-6in anair-liftfermenterwitharecombinantstrainofA.nidulans andamediumsupplementedwithsalts,fructose,and threon-ine.
The production of biopharmaceuticals by filamentous fungiiswellstudied,buttheapplicabilityofbiomolecules pro-ducedbysuchorganismsisstillrestrictedbythehighcostof purificationofsomemoleculesandbydifficultyinfilamentous fungalcultivation(Table1).52Nonetheless,theuseof filamen-tousfungifortheproductionofcompoundsofinterestisstill aninterestingstrategy.
Downstream
process:
Isolation
and
purification
of
Biophamaceuticals
Downstreamprocessingincludesallstepsrequiredtopurify a biological product from cell culture broth to final puri-fiedproduct.Itinvolvesmultiplestepstocapturethetarget biomoleculeandtoremovehostcellrelatedimpurities(e.g., hostcellproteins,DNA,etc.),processrelatedimpurities(e.g., buffers,leachedligands,antifoam,etc.)andproductrelated impurities(e.g.,aggregates,fragments,clippedspecies,etc.). Each purification stepis capableofremoving oneor more classes of impurities.53,54 Downstream processing usually encompasses threemainstages, namely(i) initialrecovery (extraction or isolation), (ii) purification (removal of most contaminants),and(iii)polishing(removalofspecified con-taminantsandunwantedformsofthetargetbiomoleculethat mayhaveformedduringisolationandpurification).53,55,56
Initialrecoveryinvolves theseparationbetweencell and supernatant(brothclarification).Forthispurpose,themain operationsemployedarecentrifugation,filtration, sedimen-tation, and flotation. If the target biomoleculeis produced extracellularly,theclarifiedbrothissubmittedto concentra-tion(e.g.,ultrafiltration)followedbypurification.Forexample, secretedandsolubleproteinsintheculturemediaofP. pas-toriscanbedirectlyrecoveredbycentrifugation.Samplescan thenbeconcentratedandthetargetproteinpurifiedfromthe supernatantbyprocessessuchasultrafiltration,precipitation, and/orchromatography.57Forintracellularbiomolecules,the cellsharvestedmustbesubmittedtolysis(e.g.,high-pressure homogenizer,sonication,passingthroughmills,etc.)followed byclarificationtoremovecelldebris.Thetargetbiomolecule ispurifiedfromtheclarifiedcellhomogenate(usuallyby pre-cipitation and/orchromatography).Incaseswhereproteins
areexpressedasinclusionbodies(assomerecombinants pro-ducedby E. coli), anextra step ofprotein refolding(buffer exchange) is required. These additional steps significantly contributetoincreasesinproductiontimeandcostsfor intra-cellularbiomolecules.58
Efficientrecoveryand purificationofbiopharmaceuticals havebeenreferredasacriticalpartoftheproductionprocess. Purificationprocessmustberobust,reliable,easilyscaled-up, andcapableofremovingbothprocesses-andproduct-related impurities to ensure product safety. The achieved purity, the speed of process development, overall recovery yield, andthroughputare someofthemainkeyparametersthat mustbetakenintoconsiderationduringdownstreamprocess development.55Toreachthestringencyofpurityrequiredin the biopharmaceuticalindustry,sometimesexceeding 99%, chromatographystepsareusuallyrequired.Chromatography allows for high resolution and has traditionally been the workhorse forproteinpurification and polishing.53,56 How-ever,chromatographyhasalsobeenthemajorcostcenterin purificationprocesses,mainlyduetomediacostandrelatively longcycle times.Inaddition, thebiopharmaceutical indus-trystillfacespracticallimitationsintermsofthroughputand scalability.55
Chromatography
Different strategies based on sequences of classical chro-matographyhavebeendescribedfornucleicacids,peptides, andproteinspurification.Infact, chromatographyisavery effectivepurificationtechniquewithawiderangeof indus-trialapplicationsandcurrentlyrepresentsthefavoritechoice duetoitshighresolutioncapacity.56Theseparationprinciple inchromatographyisbasedonthedifferencesintheaffinityof thespeciescarriedbyafluidmobilephasetowardasolid sta-tionaryphase.Whenasampleisintroducedandtransported by the eluent along the column, some of its components will have more powerful interactions with the stationary phasethanothers,generatingconcentrationprofilesthatwill percolate the chromatographic columnatdifferent speeds. Thelessretainedspecieswilleluteearlierfromthecolumn thanthemostretainedones,eventuallyallowingthe collec-tionoftheproductsofinterestwithahighpuritydegree.59 Basedontheinteractionbetweenthesolidstationaryphase andbiomolecules,chromatographictechniquescanbe sum-marized into five classes: (i) affinity, (ii) ion-exchange, (iii) hydrophobicinteractions,(iv)sizeexclusion,and(v) mixed-modechromatography.60
Affinity chromatography simulates and exploits natural biological processes such as molecular recognitionfor the selectivepurificationoftargetproteins.61Thisclassof chro-matographyisprobablytheonlytechniquecurrentlyavailable thatiscapableofaddressingkeyissuesinhigh-throughput proteomicsand scale-up.62 Themost common example of anaffinityprocessisprotein-Achromatography, whichhas been appliedforover adecade inindustrial andacademic settingsforthecaptureandpurificationofantibodies.60 Sim-ilarly,protein-Lmaypossiblycometoplayaroleinantibody fragmentspurification.59Anotheraffinity-basedstrategywell establishedforrecombinantproteinspurificationistheuse offusiontags,whichare aminoacidsequencesattachedto
recombinant proteins withselective and high affinitiesfor achemicalorbiologicalligandimmobilizedona chromato-graphiccolumn.Inparticular,thepolyhistidine(xHis)taghas beenfrequentlyusedtopurifyrecombinantproteinsdueto itsbindingcapacitytowarddivalentmetalcations.60Despite thefactthataffinitymethodsusuallyeliminatepurification steps,increaseyields,anddownsizecapitalequipment,they dopresentsomedrawbacks,particularlyregulatoryonessince completewithdrawalofleachedligandsisarequirement.61
Traditional choices in chromatographic set ups include particle-based resins, batch mode operation, and packed columns. In order to address the drawbacks from these standardparameters,someprocessalternativesareattracting thepharmaceuticalindustry,especiallythechromatographic separationsbasedonsimulatedmovingbed(SMB),expanded bedadsorption(EBA),andsingleblockmonolithcolumns.
SMB chromatography is the preferred choice for enan-tiomer separation of synthetic drugs in pharmaceutical industry.However,justrecently,itsusemadeasignificantrise inbiotechnologycompanies,especiallyforproteinrefolding andcontinuousdownstreamprocess.63Thesystempresents multiple smallchromatographic columnssequentially con-nected and operated with countercurrent flow of fluids. Simulatedmovingcomesfromtheperiodicalswitchof mul-tiportinlets/outletsfromcolumntocolumn,inthedirection offluidflow,whichgivestheimpressionthatthecolumnbed ismoving.Theseinlet/outletvalves(feed,desorbent,raffinate, andextract)arepositionedinawaythatminimizedeadzones, allow desorbent recycling, optimize product recovery, and functionassemi-continuousmode.64Especiallyforrefolding, SMBtogetherwiththerecyclingofaggregatesleadtoa the-oreticalyieldof100%,excludingthefoldingequilibriumasa limitingfactorforproductivity.65Nevertheless,SMBismore complextoimplementandrequiresahigherinvestmentcost. EBAchromatographyisa3-in-1processintendedto cap-turetheproductdirectlyfromthecellsuspension,combining clarification,concentration,andinitialpurification.The bot-tomfeedfromtheEBAsystemcreatesaflowthatgradually expandstheresinandformastableparticlegradient.66This gradientconsistsofparticlesofdifferentsizerangesand dif-ferentdensities,whichrequiresanarrowrangeofcalculated flow rates. All adsorbents in direct contact with the feed-stock may bind tocells/cell debris, disruptingthe gradient and reducingrecovery.Thisissueisaddressedwithstudies onadsorptionpHtoidentifyconditionswithmaximum prod-uctadsorptionandminimumcelladhesion.67Severalstudies haveshownthe valueofEBA.Itefficientlyremoves precip-itates and captures target proteins from refold pools of E. coli-basedproduction68anditpromotesenhancedrecoveryof HumanEpidermalGrowthFactorfromE.colihomogenateand Pichiapastorisculturemedium.67
Particle-basedresinsrelyonmasstransfermainlythrough diffusion, requiring long times for large biomolecules. On the other hand, the single block monolith column has interconnectedchannelsthattransfermassmainlythrough convection, which allows for high flow velocity. In addi-tion,monolithdoesnothavethepackingstepandtolerates the passage ofair, reducing costs, and time with packing validationandrepacking/replacingsolidphaseduetoair inter-ruption.Othersignificantadvantagesareeasyscale-updueto
Table2–Unitoperationsforcontinuousdownstreamprocess.
Centrifugation Filtration Precipitation/crystallization Chromatography
Split-bowlcentrifuge Singlepasstangentialflow Tubularreactor Expandedbed
Disknozzlecentrifuge Batchtoppedoff Simulatedmovingbed
Membranecascades Annular
Diafiltration
flowindependentofdynamicbindingandcompatibilitywith severalorganic,polymer-based, andinorganicmedia.69 The disadvantageofhigherbufferconsumptioncanbedecreased withtheSMBsetup,whichcanalsobecombinedwithsingle usetechnology.Monolithsarewidelyappliedtotherecovery ofproteinssuchascoagulationfactorIX(ionexchange)70and IgG(affinitychromatography)29fromavarietyofcellculture includingP.pastoris71andE.coli.69
Alternativeseparationtechniques
Withaburgeoningbiotechnologymarket,thereisanongoing searchfornewandimprovedalternativestochromatography inanefforttolowercostsandimproveyields,while maintain-inghighproductpurity.56Severalpromisingalternativeshave beendescribed inliteratureincludingaffinity precipitation, high-performancetangentialflowfiltration,filtration strate-giesbasedonthiophilicandaffinityinteractions,two-phase aqueoussystems,high-gradientmagneticfishing,preparative electrophoresis,andisoelectricfocusing.53,55,56,58
Magneticseparationwithimmunocapturesupportsstands among the techniques used in purification kits, but just recentlyitsapplicationtoindustrialscaleshowedviablepaths. Theinitialhighcostsofthebeadsfromthekitsweresurpassed withnew materialsand broader size dispersion and bind-ingcapacity,withoutdecreasingbatch-to-batchconsistency. Sub-micronsuperparamagneticparticlesofcoatedmagnetite crystalscanbefunctionalizedaccordingtothedesired selec-tivity.Theseparticleshavebeenusedforthepurificationof enzymesandinclusionbodies.29
Filtrationwithion-exchangemembranessubstitutes flow-through chromatography for polishing steps. They remove host-cellproteins,nucleicacids,andviruseswithincreased flow rates, reduce buffer consumption and time, when
compared to traditional polishing. Hydrophobic interac-tion membranes can remove dimers and aggregates from monoclonalantibodyproductionand substitutemore chro-matographysteps.72
Generaltrends
The aim of downstream process should be to deliver the highestyieldofthepurestproductattheshortesttime/cost. However, traditional processes and quality control does not bringthe efficiency neededto keep pace with current upstreamproduction.Toaddresscurrentissues,somegeneral trends emerge asmost relevantincluding singleuse mod-ules, continuous production, process analytical technology, andqualitybydesign.73
Thedisposableunitsarecompatiblewithcontinuousmode and bringfaster routine operationbecause no cleaning or cleaning/validation hastobeperformed.73 Continuous pro-cesses generally result in higher productivity, less buffer consumption, and smaller footprint.A general end-to-end continuous process can beaccomplished byperfusion cell reactors coupled with a continuous capture step, inte-gratedwithsomeofthedownstreamtechnologiesdescribed
in Table 2. A recent and extensive review on continuous
downstreamprocessingofbiopharmaceuticalsdescribesand discusseseachsetupoptionindetail.64
Processconsistencyovertimecanbeassuredwiththeaid ofprocessanalyticaltechnology(PAT)andQualitybyDesign (QbD)conceptsdescribedintheInternationalCouncilfor Har-monisation ofTechnical Requirementsfor Pharmaceuticals for Human Use (ICH) guidelines. QbD preconizes that the productistheprocess.Therefore,itisessentialtoknowthe criticalprocessparametersandlinkthemwithcritical mate-rial attributestopredictand adjusttheirimpacton critical
Table3–Examplesoftherapeuticnativeproteinsobtainedbypurificationfromnaturalsources.
Biopharmaceutical Commercialname Hostorganism Clinicaluse
BotulinumtoxintypeA Botox Clostridiumbotulinum Severalkindsofdystonia;
cosmeticprocedures
BotulinumtoxintypeB Myoblock C.botulinum Severalkindsofdystonia;
cosmeticprocedures
Collagenase Collagenase,santyl Clostridiumhistolyticum Treatmentofthechronic
dermalulcersandburned
areas
l-Asparaginase Elspar E.coli Acutelymphocytic
leukemia(ALL)
PEG-l-asparaginase Oncaspar E.coli Chemicallymodified
asparaginase(PEGylated)to
theALLtreatment
Table4–ExamplesoftherapeuticrecombinantproteinsobtainedbyheterologousexpressioninE.coli.
Biopharmaceutical Othercommercialnames Clinicaluse
Aldesleukin(interleukin-2) Proleukin Melanomaandrenalcancertreatment
Anakinra(interleukin1(IL1)receptorantagonist) Antril,Kineret Rheumatoidarthritistreatment
Calcitonin(salmoncalcitonin) Fortical Postmenopausalosteoporosistreatment
Denileukindiftitox(interleukin-2andDiphtheria
toxinfusioned)
Ontak T-celllymphomatreatment
Filgrastim(analogtothegranulocyte
colony-stimulatingfactor)
Neupogen Neutropeniatreatment(asconsequence
ofAIDS,chemotherapy,bone-among
others)
Filgrastimpegylated Neulasta Neutropeniatreatment(asconsequence
ofAIDS,chemotherapy,bone-marrow
transplantation,amongothers)
Growthhormone(GH) Genotropin,Humatrope,
Norditropin,Norivitropin,
Nutropin,Omnitrope,
Protropin,Siazen,
Serostim,Valtropin
Prader-WilliandTurnersyndromes
Glucagon Glucagon Hypoglycemia
Glucarpidase(bacterialcarboxypeptidaseG2) Voraxaze Controlofmethotrexateconc.inpatients
withdeficientrenalfunction
Insulin(inhalation) Exubera Diabetesmellitustreatment
Insulin(fast-acting) Lispro Diabetes
Insulin(zincextended) Lente,Ultralente Diabetesmellitustreatment
Interferon-␣2a Roferon-A ChronichepatitisC.chronicmyelogenous
leukemia,hairycellleukemia,Kaposi’s
sarcoma
Interferon-␣2b IntronA ChronichepatitisC.chronicmyelogenous
leukemia,hairycellleukemia,Kaposi’s
sarcoma
Interferon-␣2bpegylated Peg-intron ChronichepatitisC.chronicmyelogenous
leukemia,hairycellleukemia,Kaposi’s
sarcoma
Interferon-1b Betaseron Multiplesclerosis
Interferon-␥1b Actimmune Chronicgranulomatousdisease,severe
osteopetrosis
Mecasermin(insulin-likegrowthfactor1) Increlex GHandIGF1deficiencies
Mecaserminrinfabate(insulin-likegrowthfactorI
anditsbindingproteinIGFBP-3)
iPlex GHandIGF1deficiencies
Nesiritide(B-typenatriureticpeptide) Natrecor Acutedecompensated
heartfailure(ADHF)treatment
Oprelvekin(interleukin11) Neumega Preventionofseverethrombocytopenia
(patientsinchemotherapy)
OspA(OutersurfaceproteinAfragmentfrom
Borreliaburgdorferi)
LYMerix Lymediseasevaccine
Palifermin(truncadekeratinocytegrowthfactor) Kepivance Treatmentoforalmucositisin(patients
undergoingchemotherapy)
Parathyroidhormone Preos,Preotact Treatmentofosteoporosisand
hypoparathyroidism
Pegvisomant,modifiedGH(preventGHbinfingto
receptor)
Somavert Acromegalytreatment
Ranibizumab(Mabfragment) Lucentis Agerelatedmaculardegeneration
Reteplase(plasminogenactivator) Rapilysi Acutemyocardialinfarctiontreatment
Somatropin,tasonermin Humatrope hGHdeficiencytreatment
Tasonermin(cytokine) Beromun Softsarcomatreatment
Urateoxidase,PEGylated Krystexxal Gout
Teriparatide.Parathyroidhormone Forteo Severeosteoporosistreatment
qualityattributes ofthe finalproduct. Processes developed underQbDknowledgecontaindesignspacesinsteadof sin-glevalueorextremelynarrowparameters;valuesinsidethe designspaceresultsingoodproductperformanceandbrings the necessary flexibility to continuous processing.74 How-ever, knowledge ofthe process requires process analytical technology(PAT)toolsthatincludeanalyticalchemistryand mathematicalandstatisticalmodeling/analysis.Amongthe options,nearinfraredspectroscopyandprincipalcomponent analysisaretrendingchoicesforanalyticalandmathematical tools,whichcanbeappliedtoseveralsteps.75
Global
consumer
market
of
microbial
biopharmaceuticals
In 1982, human insulin was the first recombinant protein that was FDA approved for use in humans as a biophar-maceuticalproduct.10,39Inthe1980s,thebiopharmaceutical industryexperiencedasignificantgrowthintheproduction andapprovalofrecombinantproteinsincludinginterferons (IFN␣,,and␥)andgrowthhormones.Inthe1990s,thefirst monoclonal antibodies (MAb) and related products experi-encedanextraordinarygrowth,andin2015,theseproducts representedtwo-thirdsoftheproductsapprovedfor commer-cialuse inthe worldaccording to the Biotrack database76 (Fig.4).
Currently,thetotalmarketsalesfrommicrobial recombi-nantproductsreachedapproximately$50billion,representing one-thirdofthetotalsalesofbiopharmaceuticals.Thechoice
30 25 20 15 10 5 0 20052006 2007 T otal n umber of products 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Monoclonal antibody related products
Recombinant proteins
Fig.4–Commercialbiopharmaceuticalproductsapproved
from2005to2015.Darkgreenbarsrepresentmonoclonal
antibodyrelatedproductsandnon-relatedtotal
recombinantproteinsarerepresentedinred.Thedataused
concerningthenumberofbiopharmaceuticalapprovalsare
availableatbiopharmabiopharmaceuticalproducts16
(http://www.biopharma.com/approvals).
of microorganism inthe production ofbiopharmaceuticals relieson many factors includinglow costproduction, easy manipulation,andpropagation,andmolecularbiology meth-ods.Someofthemostimportantbiopharmaceuticalsobtained bynaturalsourcesorbyheterologousexpressionareshownin
Tables3–5.
Table5–ExamplesoftherapeuticrecombinantproteinsobtainedbyheterologousexpressioninS.cerevisiae.
Biopharmaceutical Commercialname Clinicaluse
Albumin Recombumin Manufactureofhumantherapeutics
HepatitisBsurface antigen Engerix,Fendrix RecombivaxHB HepatitisBvaccine HepatitisBsurface
antigenandhepatitisAvirusinactibated
Ambirix,Twinrix HepatitisAandBvaccine
Hirudine Refludan,Revasc Anticoagulant
HPVvaccine Gardasil HPVvaccine
HPVsurfaceantigens Silgard HPVvaccine
Glucagonlikepeptide1,Liraglutide Victoza Diabetesmellitustreatment
Insulin Humulin,Novolin,Protaphane,
Mixtard,Insulatard,Actrapid,
Actraphane,
Diabetesmellitustreatment
Insulinaspart;insulinglulisine;insulinlispro
(fast-actinginsulinanalog)
Novolog(aspart),Apidra(glulisine),
Humalog(lispro)
Diabetesmellitus
Insulindetemir(long-actinginsulin) Levemir Diabetesmellitus
Isophaneinsulin(intermediate-actinginsulin) HumulinN Diabetesmellitus
PlateletDerivedGrowthFactor-BB Regranex Treatmentofneuropathic,chronic,
diabeticulcer
Parathyroidhormone Preos,Preotact Treatmentofosteoporosisand
hypoparathyroidism
Rasburicase Ranibizumab,Fasturtec Treatmentofleukemia,lymphomaand
tumorlysissyndrome
Somatropin(GH) Valtropin GHdeficiencytreatment
Sargramostim Leukine Neutropeniatreatment(asconsequence
ofAIDS,chemotherapy,bone-marrow
transplantation,amongothers)
b r a z i l i a n j o u r n a l o f m i c r o b i o l o g y 4 7 S (2 0 1 6) 51–63
Table6–Top-10biopharmaceuticalsbasedonsalesrevenuesin2015.AccordingtoGal77andIgea78.
Rank Product® Producttype Productionsystem Company Use 2015sales(US$
million)
Patentexpiry
U.S.A E.U.
01 Humira(Adalimumab) Anti-TNF␣MAb CHO AbbVie(U.S.) Inflammatory
diseases
14,021 2016 2018
02 Enbrel(Etanercept) Anti-TNF␣MAb CHO Amgen(U.S.)
Pfizer(U.S.) TakedaPharm. (Japan) Inflammatory diseases 9027 2028a 2015
03 Remicade(Infliximab) Anti-TNF␣MAb SP2/0 Johnson&Johnson
(U.S.) Merck(U.S.) MitsubishiT.(Japan) Inflammatory diseases 8957 2018 2014
04 Lantus(Insulinglargine) Insulinanalog E.coli Sanofi(France) Diabetes 7209 2014 2014
05 Avastin(Bevacizumab) Anti-VEGFMAb CHO Roche(Switzerland) Cancer 6905 2019 2022
06 Herceptin(Trastuzumab) Anti-HER2MAb CHO Roche(Switzerland) Cancer 6754 2019 2015
07 Prevnarfamily Polysaccharides
conjugatedto diphtheriaprotein Streptococcus pneumoniaeand Corynebacterium diphtheriae
Pfizer(U.S.) Pneumococcal vaccine
6245 2026 n.a.
08 MabThera/Rituxan (Rituximab)
Anti-CD20MAb CHO Roche(Switzerland) Cancerand
autoimmune diseases
5827 2015 2013
09 Neulasta(PEGfilgrastim) RecombinantG-CSF E.coli Amgen(U.S.)
Cancer-related infections
4715 2015 2017
10 Lucentis(Ranibizumab) Anti-VEGFFAb E.coli Novartis
(Switzerland) Roche(Switzerland)
Macular degeneration
3630 2020 2022
a ThemainpatentonEnbrel(Etanercept)wasoriginallyexpectedtoexpireonOctober2012,butowingtoafilingloophole,Amgensecuredanadditional16-yearperiodofexclusivity.n.a.,datanot
Biopharmaceuticalsarerevolutionaryinthe pharmaceuti-calindustry.Accordingtoglobalrevenues,10biotechnological relatedproductsfiguredamongthetop-25best-sellingdrugs in2015;4ofthemproducedbymicroorganisms77,78(Table6). Thesebiopharmaceuticalsaremarketedbyleading pharma-ceutical companies primarily located in U.S.A, Japan, and Europeandcompriseanarrowscopeoftreatmentprofile,with mostdrugsforthetreatmentandmanagementof inflamma-torydiseases(e.g.rheumatoidarthritis)andcancer.
Patents for cloning and production of several original-generation(branded)biopharmaceuticalshaveexpiredorwill expire within the next years (Table 6). Similar to chemi-caldrugs,oncethepatentofabiologicalproductisexpired the marketing of biosimilars and generics is possible.79 These patent expirations, combined with rising healthcare costs and population aging worldwide are paving the way forthedevelopmentofbiosimilars andbiobetters, opening newcommercialopportunities.80,81Manybiosimilarsare cur-rentlyunderdevelopmentandthesefollow-onproductswill inevitablyplaysubstantialcompetitionandanincreasingrole inhealthcareinupcomingyears.79,82InBrazilthescenariois modest,butconsideringtheglobalpanelandrecent govern-mentincentiveforthenationalbiopharmaceuticalindustry development,weexpecttoseemorepatentsinthenearfuture andalsonovelopportunitiesforbiosimilarsandbiobetters.
Conclusion
and
future
trends
Newtechnologicaladvancementsare continuouslymadeto improvethediscovery,rationalmodification,production,and purification ofbiopharmaceuticals. Innovative strategies to identifydifferentspeciesofmicroorganismsfromthe Brazil-ianbiodiversitymustbeinvestigatedtargetingthediscovery ofalternativehostsforheterologousexpression.
Conflict
of
interest
Theauthorsdeclarenoconflictsofinterest.
r
e
f
e
r
e
n
c
e
s
1.Valderrama-RinconJD,FisherAC,MerrittJH,etal.An
engineeredeukaryoticproteinglycosylationpathwayin
Escherichiacoli.NatChemBiol.2012;8(5):434–436.
2.RodríguezV,AsenjoJA,AndrewsBA.Designand
implementationofahighyieldproductionsystemfor
recombinantexpressionofpeptides.MicrobCellFact.
2014;13:1–10.
3.SekhonBS.Biopharmaceuticals:anoverview.ThaiJPharm
Sci.2010;34:1–19.
4.TuftsCenterfortheStudyofDrugDevelopment.TuftsCSDD assessmentofcosttodevelopandwinmarketingapproval foranewdrugnowpublished.Availablefrom:
http://csdd.tufts.edu/news/completestory/tuftscsddrd
cost studynowpublished[Accessed12.07.16].
5.CrommelinDJ,StormG,VerrijkR,DeLeedeL,JiskootW,
HenninkWE.Shiftingparadigms:biopharmaceuticalsversus
lowmolecularweightdrugs.IntJPharm.2003;266(1–2):3–16.
6.CoxDBT,PlattRJ,ZhangF.Therapeuticgenomeediting:
prospectsandchallenges.NatMed.2015;21(2):121–131.
7.ChenHL,ChangJK,TangRB.Currentrecommendationsfor
theJapaneseencephalitisvaccine.JChinMedAssoc.
2015;78(5):271–275.
8.DengY,WangCC,ChoyKW,etal.Therapeuticpotentialsof
genesilencingbyRNAinterference:principles,challenges,
andnewstrategies.Gene.2014;538(2):217–227.
9.WittrupA,LiebermanJ.Knockingdowndisease:aprogress
reportonsiRNAtherapeutics.NatRevGenet.
2015;16(9):543–552.
10.LeaderB,BacaQJ,GolanDE.Proteintherapeutics:a
summaryandpharmacologicalclassification.NatRevDrug
Discov.2008;7(1):21–39.
11.ZawairaA,PooranA,BarichievyS,ChoperaD.Adiscussion
ofmolecularbiologymethodsforproteinengineering.Mol
Biotechnol.2012;51(1):67–102.
12.BeckA,Biosimilar.Biobetterandnextgenerationtherapeutic
antibodies.MAbs.2011;3(2):107–110.
13.StrohlWR.Fusionproteinsforhalf-lifeextensionof
biologicsasastrategytomakebiobetters.BioDrugs.
2015;29(4):215–239.
14.SandeepV,ParveenJ,ChauhanP.Biobetters:thebetter
biologicsandtheirregulatoryoverview.IntJDrugRegulAff.
2016;4(1):13–20.
15.MitragotriS,BurkePA,LangerR.Overcomingthechallenges
inadministeringbiopharmaceuticals:formulationand
deliverystrategies.NatRevDrugDiscov.2014;13(9):
655–672.
16.BIOPHARMA:BiopharmaceuticalProductsintheU.S.and EuropeanMarkets.ThisisalistofnewfullFDAapprovalsfor biopharmaceuticalproducts(unlessotherwisenoted). Availablefrom:http://www.biopharma.com/approvals.html
[Accessed12.07.16].
17.MullardA.EMAgreenlightssecondgenetherapy.NatRev
DrugDiscov.2016;15(5):299.
18.CarrDR,BradshawSE.Genetherapies:thechallengeof
super-high-costtreatmentsandhowtopayforthem.Regen
Med.2016;11(4):381–393.
19.CarterPJ.Introductiontocurrentandfutureprotein
therapeutics:aproteinengineeringperspective.ExpCellRes.
2011;317(9):1261–1269.
20.CourtoisF,SchneiderCP,AgrawalNJ,TroutBL.Rational
designofbiobetterswithenhancedstability.JPharmSci.
2015;104(8):2433–2440.
21.ChirinoAJ,AryML,MarshallS.Minimizingthe
immunogenicityofproteintherapeutics.DrugDiscovToday.
2004;9(2):82–90.
22.WhitfordD.Thethree-dimensionalstructureofprotein.In:
Proteins:StructureandFunction.1sted.WestSussex,England:
JohnWiley&Sons;2005:39–83.
23.CourtoisF,AgrawalNJ,LauerTM,TroutBL.Rationaldesignof
therapeuticmAbsagainstaggregationthroughprotein
engineeringandincorporationofglycosylationmotifs
appliedtobevacizumab.MAbs.2016;8(1):99–112.
24.HuangM,ShaoY,HouJ,etal.Structuralasymmetryof
phosphodiesterase-9aandauniquepocketforselective
bindingofapotentenantiomericinhibitor.MolPharmacol.
2015;88(5):836–845.
25.AprileFA,SormanniP,VendruscoloM.Arationaldesign
strategyfortheselectiveactivityenhancementofa
molecularchaperonetowardatargetsubstrate.Biochemistry.
2015;54(32):5103–5112.
26.CarterP.Site-directedmutagenesis.BiochemJ.1986;237:1–7.
27.HsiehP,VaisvilaR.Proteinengineering:singleormultiple
site-directedmutagenesis.MethodsMolBiol.
2013;978:173–186.
28.KowalskyCA,FaberMS,NathA,etal.Rapidfine
conformationalepitopemappingusingcomprehensive
mutagenesisanddeepsequencing.JBiolChem.
29.GronemeyerP,DitzR,StrubeJ.Trendsinupstreamand
downstreamprocessdevelopmentforantibody
manufacturing.Bioengineering.2014;1(4):188–212.
30.SchmidellW,LimaUdeA,AquaroneE,BorzaniW.
BiotecnologiaIndustrial.v.2.1aed.EngenhariaBioquímicaSão
Paulo,Brasil:Blucher;2001.
31.ParkWH,AtkinsonJP.Therelationofthetoxicityof
diphtheriatoxintoitsneutralizingvalueuponantitoxinat
differentstagesinthegrowthofculture.JExpMed.
1898;3(4–5):513–532.
32.BaxterAG.Theoriginandapplicationofexperimental
autoimmuneencephalomyelitis.NatRevImmunol.
2007;7(11):904–912.
33.IgeaJM.Thehistoryoftheideaofallergy.Allergy.
2013;68(8):966–973.
34.GrafCJ,WoodworthJR,SegerME,HolcombeJH,BowsherRR,
LynchR.Pharmacokineticandglucodynamiccomparisonsof
recombinantandanimal-sourceglucagonafterIV,IM,and
SCinjectioninhealthyvolunteers.JPharmSci.
1999;88(10):991–995.
35.LopesAM,Oliveira-NascimentoL,RibeiroA,etal.
Therapeuticl-asparaginase:upstream,downstreamand
beyond.CritRevBiotechnol.2015;23:1–18[Epubaheadofprint].
36.SyedYY,McCormackPL.Exenatideextended-release:an
updatedreviewofitsuseintype2diabetesmellitus.Drugs.
2015;75(10):1141–1152.
37.Powell-JacksonJ,WellerRO,KennedyP,PreeceMA,
WhitcombeEM,Newsom-DavisJ.Creutzfeldt-Jakobdisease
afteradministrationofhumangrowthhormone.Lancet
(London,England).1985;2(8449):244–246.
38.DemainAL,VaishnavP.Productionofrecombinantproteins
bymicrobesandhigherorganisms.BiotechnolAdv.
2009;27(3):297–306.
39.RosenfeldL.Insulin:discoveryandcontroversy.ClinChem.
2002;48(12):2270–2288.
40.LimJC,ChoiH-I,ParkYS,etal.Irreversibleoxidationofthe
active-sitecysteineofperoxiredoxintocysteinesulfonicacid
forenhancedmolecularchaperoneactivity.JBiolChem.
2008;283(43):28873–28880.
41.ZhaoK,PingW,LiQ,etal.Aspergillusnigervar.taxi,anew
speciesvariantoftaxol-producingfungusisolatedfrom
TaxuscuspidatainChina.JApplMicrobiol.
2009;107(4):1202–1207.
42.O’ConnellS,WalshG.Applicationrelevantstudiesoffungal
beta-galactosidaseswithpotentialapplicationinthe
alleviationoflactoseintolerance.ApplBiochemBiotechnol.
2008;149(2):129–138.
43.OliveiraC,GuimarãesPMR,DominguesL.Recombinant
microbialsystemsforimproved-galactosidaseproduction
andbiotechnologicalapplications.BiotechnolAdv.
2011;29(6):600–609.
44.Ruiz-MatuteAI,Corzo-MartínezM,MontillaA,OlanoA,
CopoviP,CorzoN.Presenceofmono-,di-and
galactooligosaccharidesincommerciallactose-freeUHT
dairyproducts.JFoodComposAnal.2012;28(2):164–169.
45.ZabianBassettoR,RodriguesMCC,AlmeidaMM,de
ChiquettoNC.Caracterizac¸ãodaproduc¸ãode
galactooligossacarideosporfermentac¸ãosequencial.
EvidênciaCiênciaeBiotecnogia.2014;14:57–68.
46.LiC-W,SongR-Q,YangL-B,DengX.Isolation,purification,
andstructuralidentificationofanantifungalcompound
fromatrichodermastrain.JMicrobiolBiotechnol.
2015;25(8):1257–1264.
47.SvahnKS,ChryssanthouE,OlsenB,BohlinL,GöranssonU.
PenicilliumnalgiovenseLaxaisolatedfromAntarcticaisanew
sourceoftheantifungalmetaboliteamphotericinB.Fungal
BiolBiotechnol.2015;2(1):2–8.
48.WatanabeK.Collagenolyticproteasesfrombacteria.Appl
MicrobiolBiotechnol.2004;63(5):520–526.
49.KumarCG,TakagiH.Microbialalkalineproteases:froma
bioindustrialviewpoint.BiotechnolAdv.1999;17(7):561–594.
50.CarrezD,JanssensW,DegraveP,etal.Heterologousgene
expressionbyfilamentousfungi:secretionofhuman
interleukin-6byAspergillusnidulans.Gene.1990;94(2):
147–154.
51.YadwadVB,WilsonS,WardOP.Effectofcultureconditions
andinductionstrategiesonproductionofhuman
interleukin-6byarecombinantAspergillusnidulansstrain.
MycolRes.1996;100(3):356–360.
52.MarasM,vanDieI,ContrerasR,vandenHondelCA.
Filamentousfungiasproductionorganismsforglycoproteins
ofbio-medicalinterest.GlycoconjJ.1999;16(2):99–107.
53.AzevedoAM,RosaPAJ,FerreiraIF,Aires-BarrosMR.
Chromatography-freerecoveryofbiopharmaceuticals
throughaqueoustwo-phaseprocessing.TrendsBiotechnol.
2009;27(4):240–247.
54.RathoreAS,KapoorG.Applicationofprocessanalytical
technologyfordownstreampurificationofbiotherapeutics.J
ChemTechnolBiotechnol.2015;90(2):228–236.
55.RosaPAJ,FerreiraIF,AzevedoAM,Aires-BarrosMR.Aqueous
two-phasesystems:aviableplatforminthemanufacturing
ofbiopharmaceuticals.JChromatogrA.
2010;1217(16):2296–2305.
56.FieldsC,LiP,O’MahonyJJ,LeeGU.Advancesinaffinity
ligand-functionalizednanomaterialsforbiomagnetic
separation.BiotechnolBioeng.2016;113(1):11–25.
57.WeinackerD,RabertC,ZepedaAB,FigueroaCA,PessoaA,
FaríasJG.ApplicationsofrecombinantPichiapastorisinthe
healthcareindustry.BrazJMicrobiol.2013;44(4):1043–1048.
58.RoqueACA,LoweCR,TaipaMA.Antibodiesandgenetically
engineeredrelatedmolecules:productionandpurification.
BiotechnolProg.2004;20(3):639–654.
59.FariaRPV,RodriguesAE.Instrumentalaspectsofsimulated
movingbedchromatography.JChromatogrA.
2015;1421:82–102.
60.SaraswatM,MusanteL,RavidáA,ShorttB,ByrneB,
HolthoferH.Preparativepurificationofrecombinant
proteins:currentstatusandfuturetrends.BiomedResInt.
2013;2013:1–18.
61.LoweCR.Combinatorialapproachestoaffinity
chromatography.CurrOpinChemBiol.2001;5(3):248–256.
62.LoweCR,LoweAR,GuptaG.Newdevelopmentsinaffinity
chromatographywithpotentialapplicationinthe
productionofbiopharmaceuticals.JBiochemBiophysMethods.
2001;49(1–3):561–574.
63.WarikooV,GodawatR,BrowerK,etal.Integratedcontinuous
productionofrecombinanttherapeuticproteins.Biotechnol
Bioeng.2012;109(12):3018–3029.
64.JungbauerA.Continuousdownstreamprocessingof
biopharmaceuticals.TrendsBiotechnol.2013;31(8):479–492.
65.FreydellEJ,BulsinkY,vanHaterenS,vanderWielenL,
EppinkM,OttensM.Size-exclusionsimulatedmovingbed
chromatographicproteinrefolding.ChemEngSci.
2010;65(16):4701–4713.
66.CramerSM,HolsteinMA.Downstreambioprocessing:recent
advancesandfuturepromise.CurrOpinChemEng.
2011;1(1):27–37.
67.RostiIA,RamananRN,TanJS,LingTC,AriffAB.Recoveryof
microquantitiesofhumanepidermalgrowthfactorfrom
EscherichiacoliHomogenateandPichiapastorisculture
mediumusingexpandedbedadsorption.SepSciTechnol.
2014;49(5):702–708.
68.XuX,HirparaJ,EptingK,etal.Clarificationandcaptureof
high-concentrationrefoldpoolsforE.coli-basedtherapeutics
usingexpandedbedadsorptionchromatography.Biotechnol
Prog.2014;30(1):113–123.
69.RajamanickamV,HerwigC,SpadiutO.Monolithsin
70.RibeiroDA,PassosDF,FerrazHC,CastilhoLR.
Anion-exchangepurificationofrecombinantfactorIXfrom
cellculturesupernatantusingdifferentchromatography
supports.JChromatogrBAnalTechnolBiomedLifeSci.
2013;938:111–118.
71.KrainerFW,PletzenauerR,RossettiL,HerwigC,GliederA,
SpadiutO.Purificationandbasicbiochemical
characterizationof19recombinantplantperoxidase
isoenzymesproducedinPichiapastoris.ProteinExprPurif.
2014;95:104–112.
72.LiF,LeeB,ZhoJX,TresselT,YangX.Currenttherapeutic
antibodyproductionandprocessoptimization.BioProccessing
J.2006;5:16–25.
73.GottschalkU.Thefutureofdownstreamprocessing.
BioPharmInt.2011;24(9):38–47.
74.YuLX,AmidonG,KhanMA,etal.Understanding
pharmaceuticalqualitybydesign.AAPSJ.2014;16(4):771–783.
75.GlasseyJ,GernaeyKV,ClemensC,etal.Processanalytical
technology(PAT)forbiopharmaceuticals.BiotechnolJ.
2011;6(4):369–377.
76.bioTRAKdatabase.Availablefrom:http://bptc.com[Accessed 14.07.16].
77.GalR.Biosimilars:ReviewingUSlawandUS/EUpatents; bottomupmodelsuggests12productsand$7-$8Bmarketby 2020.BernsteinResearch.Availablefrom:http://www. gabionline.net/layout/set/print/content/view/full/2030
[Accessed06.10.16].
78.DezzaniL.Top25PharmaceuticalProductsin2015.Available from:
https://igeahub.com/2016/04/30/top-25-pharmaceutical-products-in-2015/[Accessed11.10.16].
79.PolimeniG,TrifiròG,IngrasciottaY,CaputiAP.The
adventofbiosimilarsforthetreatmentofdiabetes:current
statusandfuturedirections.ActaDiabetol.2015;52(3):
423–431.
80.KresseG-B.Biosimilars–science,status,andstrategic
perspective.EurJPharmBiopharmOffJArbeitsgemeinschaftfür
PharmVerfahrenstechnikeV.2009;72(3):479–486.
81.HuaS,OhMJ,OzcanS,SeoYS,GrimmR,AnHJ.
Technologiesforglycomiccharacterizationof
biopharmaceuticalerythropoietins.TrACTrendsAnalChem.
2015;68:18–27.
82.DörnerT,KayJ.Biosimilarsinrheumatology:current
perspectivesandlessonslearnt.NatRevRheumatol.