Rita Araujo <[email protected]>
R: your request on major hazards
1 mensagemAniello Amendola <[email protected]> 25 de Maio de 2013 às 12:46 Para Rita Araujo <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected], Elisabeth Krausmann <[email protected]>, [email protected]
Dear Rita,
tank for your interest in our Seveso works.
I am very happy to review your manuscripts if any, however it is a long time I am no longer working in this field.
Updated information can only be achieved by my old and new JRC-Ispra colleagues, to whom I copied your mail.
All the best
Aniello
Da: Rita Araujo [mailto:[email protected]]
Inviato: mercoledì 22 maggio 2013 23.12
A: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Cc: Isabel Abreu dos Santos
Oggetto:
Dear Sir,
I am a Master’s degree Student at a Portuguese Superior Institute in Lisbon and I am developing a research on "Seveso Directive - What criterion of risk acceptability to Portugal?".
I have been a reader and student of your published articles on the Seveso subject, and if possible, would like to ask you several questions.
With your authority and expertise in this subject, would you please answer or advise some literature, on the following questions?
Considering countries that have implemented safety distances and / or approved acceptable risk levels what were the procedures?
1 – As a consequence of the implementation of safety distances, were the existing installations closed, relocated, or any other option?
2 – Were populations relocated?
I would really appreciate if you could contribute to my research. Since I am just finishing would it be possible to reply within the next two weeks?
I am very grateful, Best regards,
