• Nenhum resultado encontrado

Breastfeeding and asthma in a sample of portuguese children : Trabalho de Investigação : Aleitamento materno e asma numa amostra de crianças portuguesas

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Breastfeeding and asthma in a sample of portuguese children : Trabalho de Investigação : Aleitamento materno e asma numa amostra de crianças portuguesas"

Copied!
41
0
0

Texto

(1)

BREASTFEEDING AND ASTHMA IN A SAMPLE OF

PORTUGUESE CHILDREN

Aleitamento materno e asma numa amostra de crianças

portuguesas

Trabalho de Investigação

Maria João Leite Fonseca Orientado por: Dr.ª Patrícia Padrão

(2)
(3)

Agradecimentos

À Dr.ª Patrícia Padrão por toda a sua ajuda na realização deste trabalho de investigação. Devo-lhe o despertar do meu gosto pela investigação.

Ao Professor Doutor Pedro Moreira e ao Prof. Doutor André Moreira pelos comentários construtivos ao trabalho.

Às minhas tias Maria João Póvoas S. Leite e Vanessa Guedes, pela sua prontidão em me ajudar com as dúvidas de inglês.

(4)

ii Índice Agradecimentos ... i Lista de Abreviaturas ... iv Abstract ... v Resumo ... vi

Key words e Palavras-chave ... vii

Introduction ... 1

Asthma ...1

Breastfeeding ...2

Previous Studies ...3

Objectives ... 5

Participants and Methods ... 5

Study population ...5

Measurements ...6

Statistical analysis ...8

Results... 8

Characteristics of the study population ...8

Association between breastfeeding and asthma ... 11

Discussion ... 12

Brief summary of the results and comparison with literature ... 12

Biological explanation of the results ... 13

Controversies ... 14

Reasons for different results in literature... 15

Confounders ... 16

(5)

Conclusions ... 19 References ... 20

(6)

iv

Lista de Abreviaturas

OR ± Odds Ratio;

CI ± Confidence Interval; Th1 ± T helper cells type 1; Th2 ± T helper cells type 2; IgE - Immunoglobulin E; IQ - Intelligence Quotient;

SIDS - Sudden Infant Death Syndrome; BMI - Body Mass Index.

(7)

Abstract

Introduction: Asthma is one of the most common chronic diseases worldwide.

Some studies show that breastfeeding could be one of the solutions for this disease. However, the longstanding question of whether breastfeeding prevents or augments the incidence of asthma remains controversial. Objective: The aim of the present study is to quantify the association between the duration of breastfeeding and the occurrence of asthma in infancy. Methods: We invited 5867 Portuguese children randomly selected from elementary schools in Porto and their parents/caretakers to participate in the study. Of those schools who agreed to take part 3391 parents signed and returned the consent form fulfilled. Children were measured by two trained persons and their parents answered a questionnaire, regarding socio-demographic characteristics, asthma and breastfeeding. Overall, 2512 questionnaires were returned and children who did not meet the requirements were removed, living a final sample of 1976 children from 5 to 10 years old. Unconditional logistic regression models adjusting for confounders were performed to estimate the association between asthma and breastfeeding.

Results: Our results show that boys suffered significantly more from asthma than

girls (11.2% vs. 7.4%, p = 0.004) and that breastfeeding for more than 3 months was inversely related to the presence of asthma, only amongst boys [OR = 0.630 (95% CI: 0.398-0.997)]. Conclusion: Prolonged breastfeeding for more than 3 months amongst boys was associated with a reduced probability of having asthma in childhood.

(8)

vi

Resumo

Introdução: Por todo o mundo, a asma é uma das doenças crónicas mais

comuns. Alguns estudos mostram que o aleitamento materno poderá ser uma das soluções no combate a esta doença. No entanto, há estudos que demonstram que o aleitamento materno diminui a incidência de asma, outros que revelam que não tem efeito e outros ainda evidenciam que o aleitamento materno aumenta a incidência desta doença. Assim, esta questão permanece bastante controversa.

Objectivo: O objectivo deste estudo é quantificar a relação existente entre o

aleitamento materno e a presença de asma na infância. Métodos: Foram convidadas para participar no estudo 5867 crianças seleccionadas aleatoriamente de escolas primárias do Porto, juntamente com os seus pais/encarregados de educação. Das escolas que aceitaram participar, 3391 pais/encarregados de educação assinaram e devolveram o termo de consentimento preenchido. Essas crianças foram medidas por dois profissionais treinados e os seus pais responderam a um questionário que incluía informação sócio-demográfica, diagnóstico médico de asma e duração de exposição a aleitamento materno. No final, 2512 questionários foram devolvidos e as crianças que não correspondiam aos requisitos foram eliminadas, deixando uma amostra final de 1976 crianças dos 5 aos 10 anos. Modelos de regressão logística ajustados para confundidores foram utilizados para estimar a associação entre a asma e o aleitamento materno.

Resultados: Os nossos resultados mostraram que a prevalência de asma é maior

nos rapazes do que nas raparigas (11,2% vs. 7,4%, p = 0,004) e que o aleitamento materno por mais de 3 meses protege os rapazes de desenvolverem asma [OR = 0,630 (95% IC: 0,398-0,997)]. No que diz respeito às raparigas, não

(9)

houve nenhuma relação significativa. Conclusão: O aleitamento materno por mais de três meses associou-se a uma menor probabilidade de ocorrência de asma na infância, entre os rapazes.

Key words e Palavras-chave

Breastfeeding; Asthma; Children;

(10)
(11)

Introduction

Asthma

Asthma is one of the most common chronic diseases that presently affects approximately 300 million people worldwide. Over the last 30 years, both the prevalence and severity of asthma have risen in affluent countries, but now appear to have stabilized, with more or less 10±12% of adults and 15% of children affected by the disease (1-4). In developing countries where the prevalence of asthma had been much lower, there is a rising incidence that seems to be associated with increased urbanization (1).

The hygiene hypothesis as an explanation for increase in allergy, and therefore asthma, in westernised countries is a globally accepted theory (5). One of the possible explanations for the observed increase of atopic diseases in early childhood is the reduction of microbial exposure and, as a result, a different development of the T helper type 1 (Th1)/ T helper type 2 (Th2) immune response (6)

.

Asthma is a syndrome characterized by airflow obstruction due to excessive narrowing of the airways causing airflow reduction, symptomatic wheezing and dyspnea (1). It may be caused by different disorders. The reaction allergen-specific immunoglobulin E (IgE) that activates mast cells and initiates a complex and redundant inflammatory process, where cells, cytokines and adhesion molecules are involved at different stages is the triggering event in allergic subjects. Actually, mucosal eosinophilic inflammation is one of the typical characteristics of asthma and the particular T helper type 2 (Th2) phenotype of allergic patients favours it (7).

(12)

2

There are some risk factors that are known to be involved in asthma, some are endogenous factors (genetic predisposition, atopy, airway hyperresponsiveness, gender and maybe ethnicity) while others are environmental (indoor and outdoor allergens, occupational sensitizers, passive smoking, respiratory infections and maybe obesity and early viral infections) (1). Some of these factors are present in early life (2).

There is an effort to urgently reverse this trend of risen asthma(8), and breastfeeding could be one of the solutions. However, the longstanding question of whether breastfeeding prevents or reduces the incidence of asthma remains controversial.

Breastfeeding

Breastfeeding is universally recommended E\ WKH ZRUOG¶V KHDOWK DQG VFLHQWLIic organizations as the best way of feeding infants (9-11). Years of investigation have shed light on the vast range of benefits not only for children but also for mothers and society.

For mothers, breastfeeding helps recovering from pregnancy and childbirth simultaneously offering them lifelong health advantages (10).

For society, breastfeeding provides an array of economic and environmental rewards (10).

For children, breastfeeding protects against acute and chronic illnesses and supports optimal development. Breastfeeding offers advantages for children that cannot be substituted by any other form of feeding. The benefits of breastfeeding begin right after childbirth and remain for many years after breastfeeding ends. Examples of these benefits are:

(13)

‡higher scores on cognitive and IQ tests at school age, and also on tests of visual acuity (12-15);

‡lower incidence of sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) (10, 16);

‡ EUHDVWIHG FKLOGUHQ DUH less likely to suffer from infectious illnesses and their symptoms (e.g., diarrhoea (17), ear infections (17, 18), respiratory tract infections, meningitis(10, 17));

‡ lower risk of the two most common inflammatory bowel diseases (Crohn¶V disease, ulcerative colitis) (19);

‡decreased incidence of some forms of cancer (10); ‡possible lower risk of juvenile onset diabetes (19);

‡possible lower risk of obesity in childhood and adolescence (20-23); ‡fewer cavities and diminished need for braces (24).

Despite these important benefits, there is conflicting data regarding the impact of breastfeeding on the development of asthma.

Previous Studies

Whether breastfeeding protects against the development of allergy and asthma has been regularly studied and hotly debated for more than 70 years (25-32). Some studies provided evidence of a negative association consistent with protective effect (3, 25-27, 31-44), whereas some studies reported either no association (45-52), or a positive association between the duration of breastfeeding and the risk of asthma (53-58)

.

Regarding the cohort studies, there are some that show decreased risk of asthma: a prospective birth cohort study in Sweden found that longer breastfeeding duration reduced the risk of asthma during the first 4 years of life, especially

(14)

4

among infants without heredity for allergy (37) and an Australian cohort study found that exclusive breastfeeding for at least 4 months after birth significantly reduced the risk of asthma at age 6 years (3). No association was observed between breastfeeding and the risk of asthma in two cohort studies in Australia and in the United Kingdom (45, 52). On the other hand, breastfeeding for 4 weeks or longer was associated with an increased risk of asthma at 9±26 years in a New Zealand birth cohort (56) 7KH 7XFVRQ &KLOGUHQ¶s Respiratory Study found that exclusive breastfeeding for 4 months or more was related to an increased risk of asthma and recurrent wheeze beginning at the age of 6 years although an association with recurrent wheeze early in life was preventive (58).

Concerning the reviews, a systematic review with meta-analysis of 12 prospective cohort studies came to the conclusion that exclusive breastfeeding during the first 3 months after birth protects child from asthma. The summary OR for the effect was 0.70 (95% CI 0.60, 0.81). This effect was greater in children with a family history of atopy [OR = 0.52 (95% CI: 0.35-0.79)] than in a combined population [OR = 0.73 (95% CI: 0.62-0.86)] (27). Friedman and Zeiger summarized in their recent review that exclusive breastfeeding should be encouraged for at least 4 to 6 months in infants at both high and low risk of atopy and independent of maternal asthma (25).

Some authors demonstrating a beneficial effect of breastfeeding on allergic disease indicate that both the duration (38, 41) and exclusivity (3) are important. However, there is scarce evidence of the role of long-term breastfeeding in the development of asthma.

(15)

Since most studies focus more on the exclusive breastfeeding for short-time rather WKDQ RQ LW¶V GXUDWLRQ and because there have been no studies showing the association between breastfeeding and asthma in Portugal, the present study examines that relationship amongst Portuguese school aged children .

Objectives

The aim of the present study was to quantify the association between the duration of breastfeeding (considering the duration of breastfeeding divided in 2 categories, </> 3 months) and the presence of asthma in a sample of 1976 children (5-10 years). Another purpose was to estimate the prevalence of asthma and breastfeeding in the present sample.

Participants and Methods

The study was a cross-sectional analysis, approved by each School Committee ³$JUXSDPHQWR´ and by the Ethical committee of São João Hospital, Porto.

Study population

Participants were selected at random from 40 elementary schools (38 public and 2 private ones were invited to participate in the study), throughout the city of Porto, Portugal, of which 35 schools (33 public and 2 private ones) accepted to take part. A total of 5867 children were therefore recruited.

Letters were distributed to all parents who agreed to take part outlining the aims of the study along with a consent form. Of those schools who agreed to take part

(16)

6

58% of parents signed and returned the form fulfilled. Therefore, the sample consisted of 3391 children. Anthropometric measurements were taken from all consenting children and questionnaires were distributed to parents of which 2512 were returned (74%). Children excluded from analysis included three subjects that presented congenital malformations, another 242 due to incomplete/incorrect questionnaire and 241 children for presenting extreme values of energy intake considering the Willet¶V FXW-off (59). Furthermore, all pre-school children were removed (n = 50) leaving a final sample of 1976 children from 5-10 years old, of which 991 (50.2%) were girls and 985 (49.8%) were boys. However, data regarding asthma was available from 1946 (98%) children and data regarding both breastfeeding and asthma was available from 1922 children (97%).

Measurements

Information about FKLOG¶V sex and date of birth, mothers age at birth, smoke inside the house, presence of asthma in children and in their parents, and breastfeeding were obtained through a structured questionnaire completed by the parents.

Age

The age of the children was then calculated based on the date of birth. MRWKHU¶V age at birth was calculated subtracting the age of the child to the current age of the mother.

Presence of smoke inside the house

The smoke inside the house was assessed by the questioQ³'RHVDQ\RQHVPRNH inside the house, presently?´ <HV1R'RQ¶WNQRZ .

(17)

Asthma

Asthma condition was defined as asthma ever diagnosed by a doctor. Parents answered WKH TXHVWLRQ ³'LG D GRFWRU HYHU WHOO \RX WKDW \RXU VRQ KDG DVWKPD"´ <HV 1R  'RQ¶WNnow). The atopic parents were identified by the answer to the TXHVWLRQ³'LGWKHFKLOG¶VPRWKHUIDWKHUHYHUKDYH asthma or DOOHUJLFUKLQLWLV"´ (Yes 1R'RQ¶WNQRZ .

Breastfeeding

Concerning the breastfeeding, parents were asked to indicate whether the mother had never breastfed or breastfed for less than one month, 1 to 3 months, 3 to 6 months, 6 to 12 months or more than one year. For the unconditional logistic regression models, we grouped the categories of the duration of breastfeeding into 2 categories: </> 3 months.

Anthropometrics

In each school, two trained persons performed anthropometric measurements using a standardized procedure (60). Anthropometric measurements were performed in light indoor clothing without shoes. Height was measured using a stadiometer, with the head in the Frankfort plane, and weight was measured using an electronic scale with an error of ± 100 g (Dry, Model 780, Germany). Body mass index (BMI) was then calculated. Prevalence of overweight and obesity were also determined and calculated as recommended by the International Obesity Task Force, making a correspondence between the traditional adult cut-offs (higher than 25 kg/m2 to define overweight and 30 kg/m2 to define obesity) and

(18)

8

specific values for children considering sex and age (61). Children with low or normal weight were classified, for analyses, as non-overweight.

Statistical analysis

Data were described as counts and proportions for categorical variables. Chi-square tests were used to compare proportions of several variables. A P-value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Unconditional logistic regression models were fitted, separately for boys and girls, to estimate the magnitude of the association between breastfeeding (considering the duration of breastfeeding divided in 2 categories, </> 3 months) and the presence of asthma, adjusting for confounders (age, BMI, atopic parents, smoke LQVLGHWKHKRXVHPRWKHU¶VDJHDWELUWK 

Data analysis was performed using the statistical package SPSS, 16.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).

Results

Characteristics of the study population

The prevalence of asthma was significantly higher among boys (11.2% vs 7.4%, p=0.004) (table 1). There is no statistically significant difference between the prevalence of asthma amongst ages (table 1).

Children who have atopic mother have higher prevalence of asthma (13.0% vs. 5.1%, p < 0.001 for girls; 15.5% vs. 8.9%, p = 0.004 for boys), as do so children

(19)

who have atopic father (10.7% vs. 5.9%, p = 0.029 for girls; 17.3% vs. 9.6%, p = 0.005 for boys) (table 1).

Table 1 also shows the distribution of the study population by classes of breastfeeding duration and the prevalence of asthmatic children in each class, divided by sex. There is no statistically significant difference in the duration of breastfeeding between boys and girls. The prevalence of asthmatic boys decreased with increasing duration of breastfeeding (p for trend = 0.022). No such significant association was observed in girls.

Table 1 - Prevalence of asthma in the sample according to different categories of possible confounders. Girls Boys N n % N n % Total 978 72 7.4 968 108 11.2 Age (years) 5 15 2 13.3 16 4 25.0 6 212 12 5.7 240 20 8.3 7 265 20 7.5 246 29 11.8 8 210 17 8.1 209 29 13.9 9 236 16 6.8 214 23 10.7 10 40 5 12.5 43 3 7.0

p for trend = 0.498 p for trend = 0.942

BMI

non-overweight 579 37 6.4 566 62 11.0

overweight 263 19 7.2 243 26 10.7

obesity 106 13 12.3 135 16 11.9

(20)

10 Atopic mother yes 246 32 13.0 245 38 15.5 no 702 36 5.1 683 61 8.9 p < 0.001 p = 0.004 Atopic father yes 169 18 10.7 162 28 17.3 no 723 43 5.9 710 68 9.6 p = 0.029 p = 0.005

Mothers age at birth

1st Tertile 365 27 7.4 332 42 12.7

2nd Tertile 344 23 6.7 324 31 9.6

3rd Tertile 262 21 8.0 305 33 10.8

p for trend = 0.813 p for trend= 0.446

Smoke inside the house

yes 295 18 6.1 259 30 11.6 no 677 54 8.0 708 78 11.0 p = 0.305 p = 0.805 Breastfeeding Never 54 6 11.1 61 8 13.1 < 1 month 152 11 7.2 125 19 15.2 1 to 3 months 267 22 8.2 227 29 12.8 3 to 6 months 210 13 6.2 234 25 10.7 6 to 12 months 187 13 7.0 206 17 8.3 > 12 months 95 6 6.3 104 8 7.8

p for trend = 0.329 p for trend = 0.022

N ± number of children in each class

(21)

Association between breastfeeding and asthma

Breastfeeding for more than 3 months was inversely related to the occurrence of asthma amongst boys [OR = 0.645 (95% CI: 0.430 ± 0.967]. For girls, this association was not statically significant [OR = 0.774 (95% CI: 0.476 - 1.258). When adjusting IRU SRVVLEOH FRQIRXQGHUV FKLOG¶V DJH PRWKHU¶V DJH DW ELUWK asthmatic mother, asthmatic father, presence of smoke inside the house and BMI), the ORs remained similar ± boys: OR = 0.630 (95% CI: 0.398 ± 0.997) and girls: OR = 0.886 (95% CI: 0.512 - 1.533) (Table 2).

Table 2 - Odds ratios (crude and adjusted for confounders) for asthma according to categories of breastfeeding duration.

OR (CI 95%)

Cruded Adjusted

Girls Boys Girls Boys

Breastfeeding

” 3 months 1 (reference) 1 (reference) 1 (reference) 1 (reference)

(22)

12

Discussion

Brief summary of the results and comparison with literature

We found a lower prevalence of asthma amongst girls than boys (7.4% vs. 11.2%, p = 0.004). These findings are similar to those described in literature (62, 63). No single straightforward mechanism can explain the gender differences found in asthma due to the complexity of the disease. Nevertheless, it seems to be related to biological sex differences as well as sociocultural and environmental differences (64)

. Concerning the duration of breastfeeding, there is no statistically significant difference between boys and girls. However, in the international literature, most studies show that girls are usually breastfed for longer periods than boys (65-68), but also the opposite is found (69, 70).

We found a 35.5% (CI: 3.3% - 57.0%) decrease in the probability of having asthma, and 37.0% (CI: 0.3% - 60.2%) when adjusted for possible confounders amongst boys who were breastfed for a longer period (> 3 months vs. < 3 months). Nevertheless, for girls the decreased occurrence of asthma was not statistically significant. This result was comparable to those found by van Merode T. et al (71). However, they only studied high-risk infants and asthma-like symptoms while our study involves all type of children and the diagnose of asthma by a doctor.

'HVSLWH FKLOG¶V %0, PRWKHU¶V DJH DW ELUWK DQG VPRNH LQVLGH WKH KRXVH EHLQJ describHGLQOLWHUDWXUHDVULVNIDFWRUVIRUDVWKPDLWGLGQ¶WKDSSHQLQWKLVSRSXODWLRQ (table 1).

(23)

Biological explanation of the results

Breastfeeding is of considerable relevance to the development of the immune system in infancy and as a result it may influence the incidence and severity of subsequent asthma and atopy later in childhood (40). There are at least five reasons to expect that breastfed children may show a reduced incidence of asthma and atopic disease (72):

1. Breastfeeding makes children less exposed to foreign dietary antigen (72), LQFOXGLQJWKRVHLQFRZ¶VPLON(73). Nevertheless, there are also antigens in mother PLON OLNH ȕ-lactoglobulin, but these antigens may induce tolerance instead of allergic sensitisation (74).

2. There are factors in human milk that encourage gastrointestinal mucosa PDWXUDWLRQ WKXV DOORZLQJ HDUO\ µµFORVXUH¶¶ RI PDFURPROHFXODU DEVRUSWLRQ (72). In many mammals, the most remarkable effect of diet onto intestinal development RFFXUV LPPHGLDWHO\IROORZLQJ WKHILUVW IHHG RI PRWKHU¶VPLON 7KLVPD\ EH FDXVHG by an expression of genes triggered by the constituents of the milk. A range of growth factors, hormones, and other similar biologically active substances present in human milk act synergistically in growth modulation (75).

3. The possibility of sensitisation may be reduced by decreasing the incidence of infection and possibly altering the gut microflora that can act as an adjuvant for ingested food proteins (72). Soluble and cellular host defence components as well as nonspecific lymphoid components and nonlymphoid antiinfectious elements, which are present in human colostrum and milk, protect the neonate from infection in a hostile environment (76-78).

4. Macromolecular uptake is restricted by functional immunomodulatory and antiinflammatory factors contained in human milk (72). Long lasting systemic

(24)

14

immunomodulating properties that may be present in human milk (79) can protect against a number of diseases (80-84).

5. Cytokines and growth factors in human milk may play a significant role in modulating the development of asthma (72).

Controversies

Until some time ago, the role of breastfeeding in preventing asthma and allergy was unquestionable, along with consistent evidence from many cross-sectional and cohort studies (3, 85-87). However, in 2000, data from a US cohort study in Tucson showed that breastfeeding was generally protective against atopic illness although breastfeeding mothers who had high IgE levels had children with higher rates of asthma and allergy (58). This was followed by a New Zealand cohort study in Dunedin, which showed that children who were breastfed for more than 4 weeks were more likely to have asthma as young adults (56).

The methodologic quality of both cohort studies was critically appraised by Peat et al. (88). Regarding the Dunedin cohort, their major concern was that, like in our study, breastfeeding data were obtained retrospectively (at 3 years of age), so there could be mistaken or biased recall. The rates and duration of breastfeeding were also low compared to the latest trends in Australia (89). The Tucson cohort was drawn from a population of children who obtained care from paediatricians attached to a specific insurance provider and hence represent a middle-class population. Both cohorts were criticized for not defining the level of exclusive breastfeeding and a lack of scientific plausibility for their results.

Nevertheless, these studies have various strengths. The Tucson cohort had good outcome measures of asthma and atopy and was well powered, and some have

(25)

argued that there are biologically possible explanations for their findings. In order to defend their cohort, Sears et al. (56) indicated that there was a high degree of agreement of breastfeeding data with more recent child health records and that the cohort met the most of the criteria proposed by Kramer (30) for determining the effect of breastfeeding on asthma. It was also suggested that a plausible explanation for an association between breastfeeding and increased atopic disease could be the hygiene hypothesis.

Reasons for different results in literature

The duration of follow up and ages at which outcomes are assessed are the main reasons why in some studies breastfeeding protect against atopy and asthma, whereas in others the risk increases. Studies in which early childhood outcomes (eczema or wheezing illness before the age of 2) were assessed demonstrate protection from prolonged or exclusive breastfeeding, while those in which outcomes in later childhood were assessed show increased atopy and asthma risk. However, there are other reasons for the heterogeneity of these results.

A key issue is the distribution of the duration of breastfeeding in the study population. The range of duration varies considerably. In some study populations, like the U.S. (33) and New Zealand (56), many children were not breastfed while in others, for instance in Norway (39) and Sweden (38), practically all children are fed with breast milk. This becomes important when fitting a dichotomous variable if the true relation is non-linear.

The extent of follow-up and the age of onset of asthma are other important issues. If breastfeeding delays the onset of asthma, the present prevalence of asthma would be lower amongst breastfed than non-breastfed in early childhood, but

(26)

16

similar in later life. A stronger protective effect (summary OR = 0.47, 95 % CI 0.34 - 0.66) in studies with less than a 2-year follow-up period compared to those with 2 or more years follow-up period (summary OR = 0.72, 95 % CI 0.62 - 0.82) are shown in the meta-analysis of Gdalevich et al. (27). In the present study, we tried to understand the long-term effects of breastfeeding and utilized as outcomes the occurrence of asthma at the age of 5 to 10 years old.

Breast milk is itself naturally complex immunologically and has allergens that may in some cases be sensitizing and in other cases protective, depending on a diversity of factors. Besides, the IgE concentrations diverge in breast milk. There may be also genetic differences in infant/mother pairs that have an effect on whether breastfeeding would be protective or sensitizing.

The relation between breastfeeding and asthma could also be changed by exposures to environmental factors. Data from the third US National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey indicated that in children exposed to environmental tobacco smoke, breastfeeding might reduce the prevalence of asthma and recurrent wheezing, but not in unexposed children (33). In the present study, we adjusted for the presence of smoke inside the house, but it did not modify the relationship.

The use of different cut points for established breastfeeding and different confounding factors may also be relevant.

Confounders

A review of the literature recognized an array of possible confounding factors and we adjusted for some of them:

(27)

- atopic father or mother ± if one of the parents is atopic or asthmatic, their infants are more likely to develop asthma; in addition, if asthmatic women were more likely to breastfeed their children, this may have resulted in an increased prevalence of asthma in breastfed children (35, 90).

- mothers age at birth ± the beneficial effect of breastfeeding on asthma PLJKWGHSHQGRQWKHKLJKFRQFHQWUDWLRQRIV&'LQWKHPRWKHU¶VPLONDVKLJKHU levels of sCD14 are associated with younger age, it is expected that younger mothers that breastfed have less risk to have children with asthma (44).

- BMI ± children with higher BMI have increased risk of developing asthma (40, 91-93)

, and this trend almost reached statistical significance in girls; nevertheless, BMI was considered a confounding variable in logistic regression.

- presence of smoke inside the house ± tobacco smoke is one environmental risk factor for asthma (94-96); besides, women who smoked during pregnancy and in the postnatal period have children with reduced lung function in both infancy and later childhood, increased lower respiratory tract infections in infancy, and suffer more frequent exacerbations of asthma and may have an increased risk of developing asthma (97); there is also a strong association between smoking and both the decision to breastfeed and the duration of breastfeeding (98).

Limitations and Strengths

This study has some limitations. First, the number of parents who return the consent form and the questionnaires fulfilled maybe considered low (42.8 %), and thoVHZKRGLGQ¶WDQVZHUPD\EHGLIIHUHQWIURPWKRVHZKRDQVZHUHGLQWURGXFLQJD selection bias. It is also known from previous research into survey participation that population-based samples may under-represent the most socio-economically

(28)

18

disadvantaged and overrepresent the advantaged (99). Moreover, from the final sample composed of 1976 children, data regarding both breastfeeding and asthma was only available for 1922 (97%). Secondly, it was a retrospective study, so there may be also a recall bias. When assessing the outcomes, we only relied on the reports of the parents, which may have led to a misclassification of the children both regarding the diagnosis of asthma as the categories of breastfeeding. Besides, the degree of exclusive breastfeeding is not known. As most studies relate the time of exclusive breastfeeding with asthma, it was difficult to compare our results with them. Thirdly, although we adjusted for age, atopic parents, PRWKHU¶V DJH DW ELUWK FKLOG¶V %0, DQG SUHsence of smoke inside the house it is acknowledged that there may be other confounders that were not measured and cannot be taken into account, such as the age of onset of asthma, mothers who smoked during pregnancy and in the postnatal period or the presence of indoor domestic pets.

However, this study has important strengths as is the relatively high number of participants involved. Also, of the 3391 questionnaires distributed, 2512 returned completed, so our response rate was relatively high (74%). Since being male is a known risk factor for asthma (100) we stratified the population based on sex and then adjusted for known confounders. It is essential to control confounders (factors that will change rates of both breastfeeding and asthma) in an observational study such as this. We compared asthma with the extent of breastfeeding while most studies focus more on the exclusive breastfeeding for short-time rather than on its duration. Besides, there are scarce studies regarding these issues (asthma and breastfeeding) in Portugal. This means that this is a pioneer study in this area.

(29)

Conclusions

Our findings support the hypothesis that prolonged breastfeeding for more than 3 months among boys may reduce their chance of having asthma in childhood. However, further studies are essential to confirm these benefits and to understand better the mechanisms concerned. Nevertheless, public health interventions promoting an increased duration of breastfeeding may help to reduce the prevalence of childhood asthma, especially in boys.

(30)

20

References

1. Fauci AS, Harrison TRPoim. Harrison's principles of internal medicine. 17th ed. / editors, Anthony S. Fauci ... [et al.]. ed. New York ; London: McGraw-Hill Medical; 2008. p. 2 v. (xxxvii, 2754 p.).

2. Jarvis D, Burney P. The epidemiology of allergic disease. BMJ. 1998; 316(7131):607-10.

3. Oddy WH, Holt PG, Sly PD, Read AW, Landau LI, Stanley FJ, et al. Association between breast feeding and asthma in 6 year old children: findings of a prospective birth cohort study. BMJ. 1999; 319(7213):815-9.

4. von Mutius E. The burden of childhood asthma. Arch Dis Child. 2000; 82 Suppl 2:II2-5.

5. Martinez FD, Holt PG. Role of microbial burden in aetiology of allergy and asthma. Lancet. 1999; 354 Suppl 2:SII12-5.

6. Strachan DP. Family size, infection and atopy: the first decade of the "hygiene hypothesis". Thorax. 2000; 55 Suppl 1:S2-10.

7. Passalacqua G, Ciprandi G. Allergy and the lung. Clin Exp Immunol. 2008; 153 Suppl 1:12-6.

8. Peat JK, Li J. Reversing the trend: reducing the prevalence of asthma. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1999; 103(1 Pt 1):1-10.

9. The optimal duration of exclusive breastfeeding: results of a WHO systematic review. Indian Pediatr. 2001; 38(5):565-7.

10. Gartner LM, Morton J, Lawrence RA, Naylor AJ, O'Hare D, Schanler RJ, et al. Breastfeeding and the use of human milk. Pediatrics. 2005; 115(2):496-506.

11. Institute of Medicine. Nutrition during lactation. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1991.

(31)

12. Anderson JW, Johnstone BM, Remley DT. Breast-feeding and cognitive development: a meta-analysis. Am J Clin Nutr. 1999; 70(4):525-35.

13. Drane DL, Logemann JA. A critical evaluation of the evidence on the association between type of infant feeding and cognitive development. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2000; 14(4):349-56.

14. Mortensen EL, Michaelsen KF, Sanders SA, Reinisch JM. The association between duration of breastfeeding and adult intelligence. JAMA. 2002; 287(18):2365-71.

15. Oddy WH, Kendall GE, Blair E, De Klerk NH, Stanley FJ, Landau LI, et al. Breast feeding and cognitive development in childhood: a prospective birth cohort study. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2003; 17(1):81-90.

16. Ip S, Chung M, Raman G, Chew P, Magula N, DeVine D, et al. Breastfeeding and maternal and infant health outcomes in developed countries. Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep). 2007; (153):1-186.

17. Heinig MJ. Host defense benefits of breastfeeding for the infant. Effect of breastfeeding duration and exclusivity. Pediatr Clin North Am. 2001; 48(1):105-23, ix.

18. Uhari M, Mantysaari K, Niemela M. A meta-analytic review of the risk factors for acute otitis media. Clin Infect Dis. 1996; 22(6):1079-83.

19. Heinig M, Dewey K. Health advantages of breastfeeding for infants: a critical review. Nutr Res Rev. 1996; 9:89±110.

20. Akobeng AK, Heller RF. Assessing the population impact of low rates of breast feeding on asthma, coeliac disease and obesity: the use of a new statistical method. Arch Dis Child. 2007; 92(6):483-5.

21. Arenz S, Ruckerl R, Koletzko B, von Kries R. Breast-feeding and childhood obesity--a systematic review. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2004; 28(10):1247-56.

(32)

22

22. Butte NF. The role of breastfeeding in obesity. Pediatr Clin North Am. 2001; 48(1):189-98.

23. Gillman MW, Rifas-Shiman SL, Camargo CA, Jr., Berkey CS, Frazier AL, Rockett HR, et al. Risk of overweight among adolescents who were breastfed as infants. JAMA. 2001; 285(19):2461-7.

24. Campus G, Solinas G, Strohmenger L, Cagetti MG, Senna A, Minelli L, et al. National pathfinder survey on children's oral health in Italy: pattern and severity of caries disease in 4-year-olds. Caries Res. 2009; 43(2):155-62.

25. Friedman NJ, Zeiger RS. The role of breast-feeding in the development of allergies and asthma. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2005; 115(6):1238-48.

26. Gdalevich M, Mimouni D, David M, Mimouni M. Breast-feeding and the onset of atopic dermatitis in childhood: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2001; 45(4):520-7.

27. Gdalevich M, Mimouni D, Mimouni M. Breast-feeding and the risk of bronchial asthma in childhood: a systematic review with meta-analysis of prospective studies. J Pediatr. 2001; 139(2):261-6.

28. Golding J, Emmett PM, Rogers IS. Eczema, asthma and allergy. Early Hum Dev. 1997; 49 Suppl:S121-30.

29. Grulee C, Sanford H. The influence of breast and artificial feeding on infantile eczema. J Pediatr. 1936; 72:411-4.

30. Kramer MS. Does breast feeding help protect against atopic disease? Biology, methodology, and a golden jubilee of controversy. J Pediatr. 1988; 112(2):181-90.

31. Mimouni Bloch A, Mimouni D, Mimouni M, Gdalevich M. Does breastfeeding protect against allergic rhinitis during childhood? A meta-analysis of prospective studies. Acta Paediatr. 2002; 91(3):275-9.

32. Muraro A, Dreborg S, Halken S, Host A, Niggemann B, Aalberse R, et al. Dietary prevention of allergic diseases in infants and small children. Part III:

(33)

Critical review of published peer-reviewed observational and interventional studies and final recommendations. Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2004; 15(4):291-307.

33. Chulada PC, Arbes SJ, Jr., Dunson D, Zeldin DC. Breast-feeding and the prevalence of asthma and wheeze in children: analyses from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1988-1994. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2003; 111(2):328-36.

34. Dell S, To T. Breastfeeding and asthma in young children: findings from a population-based study. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2001; 155(11):1261-5.

35. Haby MM, Peat JK, Marks GB, Woolcock AJ, Leeder SR. Asthma in preschool children: prevalence and risk factors. Thorax. 2001; 56(8):589-95.

36. Infante-Rivard C, Amre D, Gautrin D, Malo JL. Family size, day-care attendance, and breastfeeding in relation to the incidence of childhood asthma. Am J Epidemiol. 2001; 153(7):653-8.

37. Kull I, Almqvist C, Lilja G, Pershagen G, Wickman M. Breast-feeding reduces the risk of asthma during the first 4 years of life. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2004; 114(4):755-60.

38. Kull I, Wickman M, Lilja G, Nordvall SL, Pershagen G. Breast feeding and allergic diseases in infants-a prospective birth cohort study. Arch Dis Child. 2002; 87(6):478-81.

39. Nafstad P, Jaakkola JJ. Breast-feeding, passive smoking, and asthma and wheeze in children. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2003; 112(4):807-8; author reply 08-9.

40. Oddy WH. A review of the effects of breastfeeding on respiratory infections, atopy, and childhood asthma. J Asthma. 2004; 41(6):605-21.

41. Oddy WH, de Klerk NH, Sly PD, Holt PG. The effects of respiratory infections, atopy, and breastfeeding on childhood asthma. Eur Respir J. 2002; 19(5):899-905.

42. Oddy WH, Sherriff JL, de Klerk NH, Kendall GE, Sly PD, Beilin LJ, et al. The relation of breastfeeding and body mass index to asthma and atopy in

(34)

24

children: a prospective cohort study to age 6 years. Am J Public Health. 2004; 94(9):1531-7.

43. Ong KK, Forouhi N. Communicating the benefits of breast feeding. Arch Dis Child. 2007; 92(6):471-2.

44. Rothenbacher D, Weyermann M, Beermann C, Brenner H. Breastfeeding, soluble CD14 concentration in breast milk and risk of atopic dermatitis and asthma in early childhood: birth cohort study. Clin Exp Allergy. 2005; 35(8):1014-21.

45. Burgess SW, Dakin CJ, O'Callaghan MJ. Breastfeeding does not increase the risk of asthma at 14 years. Pediatrics. 2006; 117(4):e787-92.

46. Gordon RR, Noble DA, Ward AM, Allen R. Immunoglobulin E and the eczema-asthma syndrome in early childhood. Lancet. 1982; 1(8263):72-4.

47. Gustafsson D, Lowhagen T, Andersson K. Risk of developing atopic disease after early feeding with cows' milk based formula. Arch Dis Child. 1992; 67(8):1008-10.

48. Halpern SR, Sellars WA, Johnson RB, Anderson DW, Saperstein S, Reisch JS. Development of childhood allergy in infants fed breast, soy, or cow milk. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1973; 51(3):139-51.

49. Kramer MS, Matush L, Vanilovich I, Platt R, Bogdanovich N, Sevkovskaya Z, et al. Effect of prolonged and exclusive breast feeding on risk of allergy and asthma: cluster randomised trial. BMJ. 2007; 335(7624):815.

50. Miyake Y, Tanaka K, Sasaki S, Kiyohara C, Ohya Y, Fukushima W, et al. Breastfeeding and the risk of wheeze and asthma in Japanese infants: the Osaka Maternal and Child Health Study. Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2008; 19(6):490-6.

51. Taylor B, Wadsworth J, Golding J, Butler N. Breast feeding, eczema, asthma, and hayfever. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1983; 37(2):95-9.

52. Wilson AC, Forsyth JS, Greene SA, Irvine L, Hau C, Howie PW. Relation of infant diet to childhood health: seven year follow up of cohort of children in Dundee infant feeding study. BMJ. 1998; 316(7124):21-5.

(35)

53. Fergusson DM, Horwood LJ, Shannon FT. Asthma and infant diet. Arch Dis Child. 1983; 58(1):48-51.

54. Martin AJ, Landau LI, Phelan PD. Natural history of allergy in asthmatic children followed to adult life. Med J Aust. 1981; 2(9):470-4.

55. Oberle D, Von Kries R, Von Mutius E. Asthma and breast feeding. Thorax. 2001; 56(11):896.

56. Sears MR, Greene JM, Willan AR, Taylor DR, Flannery EM, Cowan JO, et al. Long-term relation between breastfeeding and development of atopy and asthma in children and young adults: a longitudinal study. Lancet. 2002; 360(9337):901-7.

57. Takemura Y, Sakurai Y, Honjo S, Kusakari A, Hara T, Gibo M, et al. Relation between breastfeeding and the prevalence of asthma : the Tokorozawa Childhood Asthma and Pollinosis Study. Am J Epidemiol. 2001; 154(2):115-9.

58. Wright AL, Holberg CJ, Taussig LM, Martinez FD. Factors influencing the relation of infant feeding to asthma and recurrent wheeze in childhood. Thorax. 2001; 56(3):192-7.

59. Willet W. Nutritional epidemiology. New York: Oxford University Press; 1998.

60. World Health Organization. WHO Expert Committee on Physical Status. Physical Status:the use and interpretation of anthropometry. Geneva:; 1995.

61. Cole TJ, Bellizzi NC, Flegal KM, Dietz WH. Establishing a standard definition for child overweight and obesity worldwide: international survey. BMJ. 2000; 320:1240 - 46.

62. Valdivia CG, Caussade LS, Navarro MH, Cerda LJ, Perez BE, Aquevedo SA, et al. [Changes in asthma prevalence among school children during a 6 -year period: Influence of socioeconomic status]. Rev Med Chil. 2009; 137(2):215-25.

(36)

26

63. Arshad SH, Tariq SM, Matthews S, Hakim E. Sensitization to common allergens and its association with allergic disorders at age 4 years: a whole population birth cohort study. Pediatrics. 2001; 108(2):E33.

64. Postma DS. Gender differences in asthma development and progression. Gend Med. 2007; 4 Suppl B:S133-46.

65. Bouvier P, Rougemont A. Breast-feeding in Geneva: prevalence, duration and determinants. Soz Praventivmed. 1998; 43(3):116-23.

66. Lande B, Andersen LF, Baerug A, Trygg KU, Lund-Larsen K, Veierod MB, et al. Infant feeding practices and associated factors in the first six months of life: the Norwegian infant nutrition survey. Acta Paediatr. 2003; 92(2):152-61.

67. Pande H, Unwin C, Haheim LL. Factors associated with the duration of breastfeeding: analysis of the primary and secondary responders to a self-completed questionnaire. Acta Paediatr. 1997; 86(2):173-7.

68. Scott JA, Aitkin I, Binns CW, Aroni RA. Factors associated with the duration of breastfeeding amongst women in Perth, Australia. Acta Paediatr. 1999; 88(4):416-21.

69. Ferris AM, McCabe LT, Allen LH, Pelto GH. Biological and sociocultural determinants of successful lactation among women in eastern Connecticut. J Am Diet Assoc. 1987; 87(3):316-21.

70. Michaelsen KF, Larsen PS, Thomsen BL, Samuelson G. The Copenhagen cohort study on infant nutrition and growth: duration of breast feeding and influencing factors. Acta Paediatr. 1994; 83(6):565-71.

71. van Merode T, Maas T, Twellaar M, Kester A, van Schayck CP. Gender-specific differences in the prevention of asthma-like symptoms in high-risk infants. Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2007; 18(3):196-200.

72. Chandra RK. Interactions between early nutrition and the immune system. Ciba Found Symp. 1991; 156:77-89; discussion 89-92.

(37)

73. Host A. Cow's milk protein allergy and intolerance in infancy. Some clinical, epidemiological and immunological aspects. Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 1994; 5(5 Suppl):1-36.

74. Vandenplas Y. Myths and facts about breastfeeding: does it prevent later atopic disease? Acta Paediatr. 1997; 86(12):1283-7.

75. Michie CA. The long term effects of breastfeeding: a role for the cells in breast milk? J Trop Pediatr. 1998; 44(1):2-3.

76. Miles EA, Calder PC. Modulation of immune function by dietary fatty acids. Proc Nutr Soc. 1998; 57(2):277-92.

77. Xanthou M. Immune protection of human milk. Biol Neonate. 1998; 74(2):121-33.

78. Xanthou M, Bines J, Walker WA. Human milk and intestinal host defense in newborns: an update. Adv Pediatr. 1995; 42:171-208.

79. Chiba Y, Minagawa T, Mito K, Nakane A, Suga K, Honjo T, et al. Effect of breast feeding on responses of systemic interferon and virus-specific lymphocyte transformation in infants with respiratory syncytial virus infection. J Med Virol. 1987; 21(1):7-14.

80. Barros MD, Carneiro-Sompaio MM. Milk composition of low birth weight infants' mothers. Acta Paediatr Scand. 1984; 73(5):693-4.

81. Davis MK, Savitz DA, Graubard BI. Infant feeding and childhood cancer. Lancet. 1988; 2(8607):365-8.

82. Koletzko S, Griffiths A, Corey M, Smith C, Sherman P. Infant feeding practices and ulcerative colitis in childhood. BMJ. 1991; 302(6792):1580-1.

83. Koletzko S, Sherman P, Corey M, Griffiths A, Smith C. Role of infant feeding practices in development of Crohn's disease in childhood. BMJ. 1989; 298(6688):1617-8.

(38)

28

84. Mayer EJ, Hamman RF, Gay EC, Lezotte DC, Savitz DA, Klingensmith GJ. Reduced risk of IDDM among breast-fed children. The Colorado IDDM Registry. Diabetes. 1988; 37(12):1625-32.

85. Saarinen UM, Kajosaari M. Breastfeeding as prophylaxis against atopic disease: prospective follow-up study until 17 years old. Lancet. 1995; 346(8982):1065-9.

86. Tariq SM, Matthews SM, Hakim EA, Stevens M, Arshad SH, Hide DW. The prevalence of and risk factors for atopy in early childhood: a whole population birth cohort study. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1998; 101(5):587-93.

87. Wright AL, Holberg CJ, Taussig LM, Martinez FD. Relationship of infant feeding to recurrent wheezing at age 6 years. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1995; 149(7):758-63.

88. Peat JK, Allen J, Oddy W, Webb K. Breastfeeding and asthma: appraising the controversy. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2003; 35(5):331-4.

89. Donath S, Amir LH. Rates of breastfeeding in Australia by state and socioeconomic status: evidence from the 1995 National Health Survey. Breastfeed Rev. 2000; 8(3):23-7.

90. Koeppen-Schomerus G, Stevenson J, Plomin R. Genes and environment in asthma: a study of 4 year old twins. Arch Dis Child. 2001; 85(5):398-400.

91. Ginde AA, Santillan AA, Clark S, Camargo Jr CA. Body mass index and acute asthma severity among children presenting to the emergency department. Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2009;

92. Sithole F, Douwes J, Burstyn I, Veugelers P. Body mass index and childhood asthma: a linear association? J Asthma. 2008; 45(6):473-7.

93. Story RE. Asthma and obesity in children. Curr Opin Pediatr. 2007; 19(6):680-4.

94. Carlsen KH, Lodrup Carlsen KC. Parental smoking and childhood asthma: clinical implications. Treat Respir Med. 2005; 4(5):337-46.

(39)

95. Prescott SL. Effects of early cigarette smoke exposure on early immune development and respiratory disease. Paediatr Respir Rev. 2008; 9(1):3-9; quiz 10.

96. Thomson NC. The role of environmental tobacco smoke in the origins and progression of asthma. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. 2007; 7(4):303-9.

97. Le Souef PN. Pediatric origins of adult lung diseases. 4. Tobacco related lung diseases begin in childhood. Thorax. 2000; 55(12):1063-7.

98. Li R, Ogden C, Ballew C, Gillespie C, Grummer-Strawn L. Prevalence of exclusive breastfeeding among US infants: the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (Phase II, 1991-1994). Am J Public Health. 2002; 92(7):1107-10.

99. Luder E, Ehrlich RI, Lou WYW, Melnik TA, Kattan M. Body mass index and the risk of asthma in adults. Respir Med. 2004; (98):29-37.

100. Schaubel D, Johansen H, Dutta M, Desmeules M, Becker A, Mao Y. Neonatal characteristics as risk factors for preschool asthma. J Asthma. 1996; 33(4):255-64.

(40)
(41)

Referências

Documentos relacionados

The results showed that the ADAM33 rs2280091 polymorphism in all four genetic models was associated with an increased risk of childhood asthma.. This meta-analysis suggested that

Na Figura 71 podem ser visualizadas as representações 3D, obtidas através das informações provenientes das imagens utilizadas para calcular o volume do artefacto de todas as

No entanto, mesmo nesse contexto de perdas ela não desiste de ficar com o filho por acreditar que, para a criança, ainda é melhor estar com a mãe, ape-. sar dos desafios e

to promote the bond between mother and child and in the promotion of maternal well-being, but is inserted in a context of social conflicts and losses; Experiencing daily attachment

Comprometida com as premissas da Responsabilidade Social Empresarial e empenhada no desenvolvimento sustentável, a Usina Santa Terezinha desenvolve o projeto “Semeando o

Western blot analysis of soluble and insoluble fractions of PRPF31-GFP and A216P-GFP transfected ARPE-19 cells and co-transfected with WT PRPF31 tagged to Flag showed a decrease in

Nesse sentido, a fermenta- ção em estado sólido se apresenta como uma tecnologia capaz de propor caminhos alternativos para os resíduos gerados, diminuindo possíveis

Estes resultados estão de acordo com o que era expectável no que diz respeito aos casais férteis com filhos estarem juntos há significativamente mais tempo que os inférteis