• Nenhum resultado encontrado

Trajectory of serogroups causing Invasive Meningococcal Disease in Santa Catarina state, Brazil (2007–2019)

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Trajectory of serogroups causing Invasive Meningococcal Disease in Santa Catarina state, Brazil (2007–2019)"

Copied!
3
0
0

Texto

(1)

brazjinfectdis2020;24(4):349–351

w w w . e l s e v i e r . c o m / l o c a t e / b j i d

The

Brazilian

Journal

of

INFECTIOUS

DISEASES

Brief

communication

Trajectory

of

serogroups

causing

Invasive

Meningococcal

Disease

in

Santa

Catarina

state,

Brazil

(2007–2019)

Ricardo

Becker

Feijo

a,∗

,

Juarez

Cunha

b

aUniversidadeFederaldoRioGrandedoSul,FaculdadedeMedicina,DepartamentodePediatria,PortoAlegre,RS,Brazil

bSecretariaMunicipaldeSaúde,DiretoriaGeraldeVigilânciaemSaúde,UnidadedeVigilânciaEpidemiológica,PortoAlegre,RS,Brazil

a

r

t

i

c

l

e

i

n

f

o

Articlehistory:

Received29September2019 Accepted13June2020 Availableonline10July2020

Keywords:

Invasivemeningococcaldisease SerogroupW

SantaCatarinastate Brazil

a

b

s

t

r

a

c

t

The aim of this study was to compare the trajectory of serogroups causing Invasive MeningococcalDisease(IMD)intheSantaCatarina(SC)statewiththoseofwholeBrazil. AretrospectiveanalysisofallIMDcasesreportedfromJanuary2007toDecember2019was carriedout.Duringthestudyperiod,26,058IMDcaseswereregisteredinBraziland644and inSCstatealone.Overall,Brazilshowedprogressivereductionincasessince2010,whenthe meningococcalCconjugatevaccinewasintroductedonNationalImmunizationProgram, whileSCshowedanincreaseintotalcasessince2013,particularlyfromserogroupsWand C.SerogroupsdistributionwassignificantlydifferentbetweenBrazilandSC.Theemergence of serogroupWhighlights theimproved meningococcalsurveillancethroughincreased accuracyinidentificationmethodsinSCstate.Thisfindingisimportantfordiscussing rec-ommendationsofquadrivalent(ACWY)conjugatevaccinesindifferentgeographicalareas ofBrazil.

©2020SociedadeBrasileiradeInfectologia.PublishedbyElsevierEspa ˜na,S.L.U.Thisis anopenaccessarticleundertheCCBY-NC-NDlicense(http://creativecommons.org/ licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Neisseria meningitidis (N. meningitidis) causes extremely severeconditions inhumans, especiallyinvasive meningo-coccal disease (IMD) characterizedby oneor moreclinical syndromesincluding bacteremia,sepsis, ormeningitis,the latterbeingthemostcommonpresentation.1

CapsulargroupsA,B,C,W,Y,andXcausealmostallIMD.2

However,thequalityandreliabilityoftheinformationonIMD arenotuniformacrosstheworld,dueinparttodifferencesin surveillancepractices,useofdifferentdiagnosticmethodsand protocols,and application ofdifferent meningococcal case definition.3Sincelate1960scapsulargroupWhasbecomea

Correspondingauthorat:RuaAttilioBilibio120/23,91530008PortoAlegre,RS,Brazil.

E-mailaddress:rfeijo@hcpa.edu.br(R.B.Feijo).

frequentcauseofIMD,4particularlyinEurope,SouthAmerica,

Australia,andsomepartsofSub-SaharanAfrica.5

ThehighestincidenceratesofIMDareobservedinchildren agedless than oneyear,6,7 but insomeregionsother

inci-dencepeaksareobservedamongadolescents(16through21 yearsofage)8,9andthoseaged≥65years.10,11InLatin

Amer-ica,theincidenceofIMDvariesfrom<0.1casesper100,000 incountriesincludingMexico,Paraguay,Peru,andBoliviato almost twocasesper 100,000inBrazil.7 InBrazil,N.

menin-gitidiswastheprimaryetiologyofacutebacterialmeningitis withserogroupCbeingthemostprevalentinthecountry.In

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjid.2020.06.007

1413-8670/©2020SociedadeBrasileiradeInfectologia.PublishedbyElsevierEspa ˜na,S.L.U.ThisisanopenaccessarticleundertheCC BY-NC-NDlicense(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

(2)

350

braz j infect dis.2020;24(4):349–351 3000 75 50 25 0 2000 1000 0 20072008 2009 2010 2011201220132014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 20072008 2009 2010 2011201220132014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Year of report

Brazil Santa catarina

Number of cases Serogroup B C NT Other W

Fig.1–MeningococcalDiseaseinBrazilcomparedtoSantaCatarinaState. NT,nontypeable;OTHER,Otherserogroups.

Table1–Meningococcalserogroupdistributionduringtheperiodof2007-2019.

Serogroups Total NTa B C W OTHERb Brazil 13,589(52.1%) 2608(10.0%) 8728(33.5%) 802(3.1%) 331(1.3%) 26,058(100%) SCc 291(45.2%) 106(16.5%) 136(21.1%) 101(15.7%) 10(1.6%) 644(100%) a Nontypeable. b Otherserogroups. c SantaCatarinaState.

2010,theNationalImmunizationProgram(NIP)includedthe MenCconjugatevaccineforchildrenundertwoyearsold,with nocatch-upcampaigninolderagesgroups.Basedonthe sig-nificantIMDreductionobservedonlyinthevaccinatedgroup, theMinistryofHealthdecidedtoincludeMenCvaccinefor adolescentsaged11–14yearsin2017.12

Theintroductionofmultiplexreal-timePCR(polymerase chainreaction) (RT-PCR) assay testing forS. pneumoniae,N. meningitidisandH.influenzaetypeBinsentinelhospitalsinSão Pauloincreasedthediagnosticyieldforbacterialmeningitis by52,85and20%,respectively,overculture-basedmethods.13

Sincethen,therehasbeenaprogressiveincreaseintheuseof PCRassayswithimprovementinmicrobiologicconfirmation ofbacterialmeningitisthroughoutthecountry.

IMDisassociatedwithsubstantialmorbidityandoverall casefatalityrates (CFRs)ofaround 10%(withCFRsashigh as20%reportedinsomecountries).14Meningococcaldisease

causedbyserogroupWalonehasbeenassociatedwithCFRs of>30%.15

SerogroupsBandCarecurrentlydominantinLatin Amer-ica. Nevertheless, the proportion of IMD cases including outbreaksattributabletootherserogroupshavebeenreported inseveralcountries.16 SouthernBrazil,ArgentinaandChile

witnessedthe emergence ofMenWcc11 strain asa major cause ofendemic meningococcal disease after2003.17 The

statesofParana,SantaCatarinaandRioGrandedoSulinthe southernregionofBrazilbordersthesouthernconecountries ofLatinAmerica.Infact,Wserogrouprepresented17.8%ofall invasivestrainsin2003–2005comparedto3.2%in1995–2002.18

NotificationsofIMDinBrazilareroutinelycollectedbythe MinisterofHealthtroughtheInformationSystemfor Notifi-ableDiseases(SINAN).Thisstudyisaretrospectivereviewof allIMDcasesreportedinBrazilasawholeandinSCin par-ticular,from1January2007to31December2019,usingthe SINANelectronicdatabase.19,20

ThestudyvariablesincludedthenumbertotalcasesofIMD andmeningococcalserogroups.Pearson’schisquaredtestwas usedtocomparetotalcasesandserogroupsfrequencies.For comparingdistributionsevolution,stackedbarswereusedas visualization.StatisticalsoftwareusedwasRversion3.5.2.

Totalnumberofcasesandcasesaccordingtoserogroups weredifferentbetweenBrazilandSantaCatarinastatealong thereportedyears(Fig.1).Analysisoftotalnumberofcases byyearfrom2007through2019showedstatisticallysignificant differencesbetweenBrazilandSCstate(p<0.001)(Table1).

A progressive decline of total cases and its respective serogroupsoccurred afterintroduction ofmeningococcal C vaccinationin2010inBrazil.Incontrast,therewasa dimin-ishingnumberofcasesinSCstatefrom2007to2013,witha reversaloftrendsfrom2014to2018,withareductionofthe numberofthecasesin2019.

SerogroupdistributionshowedspecificchangesinSCstate. Meningococcal disease by serogroup W increasedbetween 2016–2018,withareductionin2019.UnlikeBrazil,serogroup Cshowedanincrementofcasesafter2013inSCstate.

Ingeneral,non-identifiedcasesshoweddecreasingtrends inbothregionseventhoughtheyhaveoccurredindifferent proportions.

Differencesbetweenthenumberofcasesanddistribution of serogroups cannot be clearly explained. There are sev-eralvariablesthatcanexplainthechangesintheprevalence of individual serogroups, one of them could be the natu-rallyoccurringperiodicchangesand anothertheimpactof immunizationprograms.Anotherpossibility,consideringthat SC isaregionwithhighaffluence oftourism (mainlyfrom Argentina), isthatthesedifferencescouldbeinfluencedby tourismcarriage.

ThenotificationofSCstatepresentedacutpointat Decem-ber2nd,2019,whichmightaffecttheanalysisofthefollowing monthsoftheanalyzedperiod.

(3)

brazj infect dis.2020;24(4):349–351

351

Theobservednumberofcasesandserogroupdistribution alongtimeforSCstatecomparedtoBrazil,couldimplythat healthauthorities need to reviewcurrent policies inorder tocope withexisting epidemiology, especially sincethe W serogroupisassociateddirectlywithincreasedmortalityand morbidityrates.15,16

Theemergence ofserogroupWinSChighlights the dif-ference in how health authorities have been dealing with meningococcal surveillance as the identification methods increased in accuracy. Moreover, it shows that geographi-calfeaturesshouldbeconsidered asanimportantvariable when recommending quadrivalent (ACWY) conjugate vac-cinesexceptionallyconsideringtheemergencyofastrainthat usedtobeunderrepresented.

Insummary,weshowedthatthetotalnumberofcasesand serogroupdistributioninthetimeperiodof2007through2019 inSCstatewassignificantlydifferentcomparedtoBrazil.

Funding

Sponsorshipofthisstudyandarticleprocessingchargeswere fundedbyPfizerInc.

Conflict

of

interest

TheauthorsareconsultantandspeakerPfizer,Sanofi, Glaxo-SmithKlineandMerckSharp&Dohme.

Acknowledgments

Sponsorshipofthisstudyandarticleprocessingchargeswere fundedbyPfizerInc.AllnamedauthorsmeettheInternational CommitteeofMedicalJournalEditorscriteriaforauthorship forthisarticle,takeresponsibilityfortheintegrityofthework asawhole,andhavegiventheirapprovalforthisversiontobe published.ThestatisticalanalysiswasconductedbyContent MedicineinBuenosAires,Argentina;fundingwasprovidedby PfizerInc.Thisarticleisbasedonpreviouslyconductedstudies anddoesnotcontainanystudieswithhumanparticipantsor animalsperformedbyanyoftheauthors.

r

e

f

e

r

e

n

c

e

s

1. DwilowR,FanellaS.Invasivemeningococcaldiseaseinthe 21stcentury—anupdatefortheclinician.CurrNeurol NeurosciRep.2015;15:2.

2. HarrisonOB,ClausH,JiangY,BennettJS,BratcherHB,Jolley KA,etal.DescriptionandnomenclatureofNeisseria meningitidiscapsulelocus.EmergInfectDis.2013;19:566–73.

3. SáfadiMAP,McIntoshEDG.Epidemiologyandpreventionof meningococcaldisease:acriticalappraisalofvaccine policies.ExpertRevVaccines.2011;10:1717–30.

4. ArayaP,FernándezJ,DelCantoF,SeoaneM,Ibarz-PavónAB, BarraG,etal.NeisseriameningitidisST-11clonalcomplex, Chile2012.EmergInfectDis.2015;21:339–41.

5.HarrisonLH.Epidemiologicalprofileofmeningococcal diseaseintheUnitedStates.ClinInfectDisOffPublInfectDis SocAm.2010;50:S37–44.

6.HarrisonLH,PeltonSI,Wilder-SmithA,HolstJ,SafadiMAP, VazquezJA,etal.TheGlobalMeningococcalInitiative: recommendationsforreducingtheglobalburdenof meningococcaldisease.Vaccine.2011;29:3363–71.

7.SáfadiMAP,CintraOAL.Epidemiologyofmeningococcal diseaseinLatinAmerica:currentsituationandopportunities forprevention.NeurolRes.2010;32:263–71.

8.NationalAdvisoryCommitteeonImmunization(NACI).An updateontheinvasivemeningococcaldiseaseand meningococcalvaccineconjugaterecommendations.An AdvisoryCommitteeStatement(ACS).CanCommunDisRep ReleveMalTransmAuCan.2009;35:1–40.

9.CohnAC,MacNeilJR,HarrisonLH,HatcherC,TheodoreJ, SchmidtM,etal.ChangesinNeisseriameningitidisdisease epidemiologyintheUnitedStates,1998-2007:implications forpreventionofmeningococcaldisease.ClinInfectDisOff PublInfectDisSocAm.2010;50:184–91.

10.AbadR,AgudeloCI,BrandileoneMC,ChantoG,GabastouJM, HormazabalJC,etal.Molecularcharacterizationofinvasive serogroupYNeisseriameningitidisstrainsisolatedinthe LatinAmericaregion.JInfect.2009;59:104–14.

11.CohnAC,MacNeilJR,ClarkTA,Ortega-SanchezIR,BriereEZ, MeissnerHC,etal.Preventionandcontrolofmeningococcal disease:recommendationsoftheAdvisoryCommitteeon ImmunizationPractices(ACIP).MMWRRecommRepMorb MortalWklyRepRecommRep.2013;62:1–28.

12.SafadiMAP,Gonzalez-AyalaS,JakelA,WiefferH,MorenoC, VyseA.TheepidemiologyofmeningococcaldiseaseinLatin America1945–2010:anunpredictableandchanging landscape.EpidemiolInfect.2013;141:447–58.

13.SacchiCT,FukasawaLO,Gonc¸alvesMG,SalgadoMM,Shutt KA,CarvalhanasTR,etal.IncorporationofReal-TimePCR intoRoutinePublicHealthSurveillanceofCultureNegative BacterialMeningitisinSãoPaulo,Brazil.PLOSONE. 2011;6:e20675.

14.EricksonL,DeWalsP.Complicationsandsequelaeof meningococcaldiseaseinQuebec,Canada,1990-1994.Clin InfectDisOffPublInfectDisSocAm.1998;26:1159–64.

15.MorenoG,LópezD,VergaraN,GallegosD,AdvisMF,LoayzaS. Clinicalcharacterizationofcaseswithmeningococcaldisease byW135groupinChile,2012.RevChilInfectol.2013;30:346–9.

16.ValenzuelaMT,MorenoG,VaqueroA,SeoaneM,Hormazábal JC,BertogliaMP,etal.[EmergenceofW135meningococcal serogroupinChileduring2012].RevMedChil.

2013;141:959–67.

17.AbadR,LópezEL,DebbagR,VázquezJA.SerogroupW meningococcaldisease:globalspreadandcurrentaffecton theSouthernConeinLatinAmerica.EpidemiolInfect. 2014;142:2461–70.

18.WeidlichL,BaethgenLF,MayerLW,MoraesC,KleinCC,Nunes LS,etal.HighprevalenceofNeisseriameningitidis

hypervirulentlineagesandemergenceofW135:P1.5,2:ST-11 cloneinSouthernBrazil.JInfect.2008;57:324–31.

19.DATASUS[Internet].[cited2020Mar9].Availablefrom:

http://www2.datasus.gov.br/DATASUS/index.php?area=0203& id=29892234&VObj.

20.DIVE-BoletimEpidemiológicoMensal–VigilânciadaDoenc¸a Meningocócica[Internet].[cited2020Mar9].Availablefrom:

http://www.dive.sc.gov.br/index.php/arquivo-noticias/805- boletim-epidemiologico-mensal-n-10-2018-vigilancia-da-doenca-meningococica-atualizado-em-04-de-janeiro-de-2019.

Referências

Documentos relacionados

Para tanto foi realizada uma pesquisa descritiva, utilizando-se da pesquisa documental, na Secretaria Nacional de Esporte de Alto Rendimento do Ministério do Esporte

Ao Dr Oliver Duenisch pelos contatos feitos e orientação de língua estrangeira Ao Dr Agenor Maccari pela ajuda na viabilização da área do experimento de campo Ao Dr Rudi Arno

Uma das explicações para a não utilização dos recursos do Fundo foi devido ao processo de reconstrução dos países europeus, e devido ao grande fluxo de capitais no

Neste trabalho o objetivo central foi a ampliação e adequação do procedimento e programa computacional baseado no programa comercial MSC.PATRAN, para a geração automática de modelos

No Cap´ıtulo 3, formula-se o problema dinˆ amico do planejamento da expans˜ ao dos sistemas de gera¸c˜ ao e transmiss˜ ao de energia el´etrica que tem por objetivo definir n˜

17 — Como fórmula de equilíbrio entre as várias soluções, pensamos que, para manter a igualdade real no processo, po- demos adotar a ampliação dos deveres do juiz nos termos do

Para determinar o teor em água, a fonte emite neutrões, quer a partir da superfície do terreno (“transmissão indireta”), quer a partir do interior do mesmo

State of Amapá, represented by the Institute of Environment and Territorial Planning of the State of Amapá (IMAP), the State Environment Department (SEMA), the State