• Nenhum resultado encontrado

Sao Paulo Med. J. vol.113 número2 suppl.

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2018

Share "Sao Paulo Med. J. vol.113 número2 suppl."

Copied!
2
0
0

Texto

(1)

Gulnar Azevedo Silva Mendon9a

Selection of subjects in case-controls studies

Instituto Nacional do Ciincer e Instituto de Medicina Social-

UFRJ

T he selection of cases and controls seem s to be the m ost

difficult question in planning and conducting a case-control

study and rem ains essential regarding the practical

require-m ents for all the steps of this kind of epiderequire-m iological design.

In the lim it, it w ill be the indicator that can m easure validity.

T he presence of selection bias m ay influence the results of a

given study, m aking the observed association betw een the

factor under investigation and disease stronger or w eaker than

t6he actual association.

S election bias m ust be considered for both the case and

control series, since its related to their com parability. F or

B reslow and D ay selection bias can arise w hen cases and

con-trols are included in or excluded from a study because of som e

characteristics they exhibit are related to the exposure factor

being studied. T his kind of bias according to the type of

case-control study, the disease, the risk factors and other factors.

F requently they occur w hen the exposition status is

influenc-ing the selection of individuals differently for cases and

con-trols. T he probability of being selected m ight be the sam e for

both groups of com parison in the source population in order

to prevent selection bias.

S om e specific tim es of selection bias should be outlined

here as the B earkson's bias, w hich is caused by an increased

tendency for persons w ith m ultiple diagnosis to seek or enter

treatm ent and then fall into study populations draw n from

treat-m ent sources. In the specific situation there different

prob-abilities for those w ith the index disease under study and for

individuals w ith the exposure. T he selective survival bias is

another type of bias that can occur diferentially for cases and

controls and is associated w ith the disproportionate loss of

eligible subjects before selection.

D efinitionof cases

In the case-control design, tH e m ain aim is to ensure

that all true cases of a given population have the sam e

prob-ability of taking part of the study. T his pressupose a standard

definition of the disease being studied and all logistic

pro-ceedings to find the cases. T he source of cases, in general,

are based on hospital or clinic lists, death certificates and

spe-cial health records as cancer registries or disese surveillance

system s. T he criteria of elegibility should be applied equally

to potential cases and controls. T he definition of a "case"

in-volves the establishm ent of objective criteria for diagnoses

and a statem ent of elegibility criteria of selection fo

individu-als. T he exclusion criteria depends on the definition of

expo-sure and m ight be very w ell stablished at the exclusion

crite-ria depends on the definition of exposure and m ight be very

w ell stablished at the beginning of the study. T here are som e

circunstances that can lead to a detection bias. It occurs w hen

the disease in study is nott detected (even at death) or, in the

other hand, w hen individuals of high risk have m ore

inten-sive m edical surveillance.

C ontrolS election

It seem s to be a consensus am ong epidem iologists that

the choice of controls is the m ost difficult judgem ent in

case-control research. R othm an believes that the central aim of

control recruim ent raises on the assum ption that participate

as controls in a given study, should be potential cases in the

sam e study. T his condition, how ever, is som etim es hard to

m eet in a research protocol. T he principle that the cotrols

should be selected from the sam e risk population of the

se-lected cases is intuitively acceptable. W acholder et al. have

(2)

p ro p o s e d th re e a s p e c ts th a t m u s t b e c o n s id e re d in th e s e le c

-tio n o f c o n tro ls : th e s tu d y b a s e , th e c o n fo u n d in g e lim in a tio n

a n d th e c o m p a ra b le a c c u ra c y . If th e re s e a rc h e r a c h ie v e s th e s e

th re e a s p e c ts th e n th e p o s s ib ility o f s e le c tio n b ia s , c o fo u n d

-in g a n d -in fo rm a tio n b ia s w o u ld b e re d u c e d .

In o rd e r to a v o id fu tu re p ro b le m s w ith c o n tro ls s e le c

-tio n th e re s e a rc h e s m ig h t d e fin e w h ic h is th e b a s e p o p u la tio n

a n d ta rg e t p o p u la tio n fo r th e s tu d y w h e n th e re s e a rc h is b e in g

p la n n e d .

T y p e o f C o n tro ls

U s u a lly , c o n tro ls a re s e le c te d a m o n g h o s p ita l o r c lin ic

p a tie n ts o r a m o n g th e g e n e ra l p o p u la tio n . T h e lo g is tic d

iffi-c u ltie s to a iffi-c iffi-c e s s ra n d o m ly p o p u la tio n c o n tro ls p o in ts to th e

n e e d o f u s in g o th e r ty p e s o f c o m m u n ity c o n tro ls a s frie n d s ,

n e ig h b o u rs o r re la tiv e s .

H o s p ita l o r c lin ic c o n tro ls

D u rin g a lo n g tim e , a n d e v e n n o w a d a y s , th is ty p e o f

c o n tro l h a s b e e n la rg e ly u s e d . S o m e o f th e a d v a n ta g e s o f th e

h o s p ita l c o n tro ls la y o n th e fa c ts th a t th e y w o u ld c o m e , h y p o

-th e tic a lly , fro m th e s a m e p o p u la tio n b a s e th a t g e n e ra te th e

c a s e s a n d th a t th e q u a lity o f in fo rm a tio n w o u ld b e e q u iv a le n t

to th a t o f c a s e s . It is n o t o b v io u s ly , h o w e v e r, th a t th e c a s e s

a n d c o n tro ls fro m th e s a m e h o s p ita l o r s im ila r w o u ld h a v e th e

s a m e p o p u la tio n b a s e . T h e b e s t w a y to c h e c k if th e h o s p ita l

c o n tro ls a re re p re s e n ta tiv e o f th e c a tc h m e n t p o p u la tio n is

v a lid a tin g th e ir c h o ic e b y c o m p a rin g th e m w ith c o m m u n ity

c o n tro ls . U n fo rtu n a tly , th is is n o t p o s s ib le in e v e ry c a s e c o n

-tro l s tu d y .

P o p u la tio n c o n tro ls

T h is w o u ld b e th e id e a l c h o ic e o f c o n tro l if s o m e o f th e

p rin c ip le s in s e le c tin g c o n tro ls c a n b e a s s u re d a s : th e g u a ra n

-te e o f th e s a m e s tu d y b a s e in th e tw o g ro u p s o f c o m p a ris o n ;

th e s ta b lis h m e n t o f p re c is e c rite ria o f e x c lu s io n a n d th e p o s

-s ib ility o f e x tra p o la tio n to th e b a s e th e d is trib u tio n o f e x p o

-s u re -s in th e c o n tro l-s fo r p u rp o -s e -s -s u c h a -s c a lc u la tio n -s o f a b

-s o lu te o r a ttrib u ta b le ris k . T h e re a re s o m e d is a d v a n ta g e s o f

u s in g p o p u la tio n c o n tro ls s p e c ia lly , if th e c a s e a s c e rta in m e n t

is in c o m p le te a n d w h e n th e s a m p le o f th e s tu d y b a s e is im

-p o s s ib le to b e o b ta in e d .

N e ig h b o rh o o d s c o n tro ls

In th a t s p e c ia l ty p e , s o m e o p e ra tio n a l p o in ts a re e a s ily

s u c c e e d a s a c o o p e ra tiv e p a rtic ip a tio n o f th e c o n tro ls a n d th e

a b ility to m a tc h o n v a ria b le s re la te d to s o c ia l c la s s . T h e y a re

u s u a lly c h o s e n n o n ra n d o m ly w ith in a g e o g ra p h ic a l s e t w h a t

m a y le a d to a n in d e p e n d e n c e o f th e s e le c tio n p ro c e s s a n d th e

e x p o s u re . T h e u s e o f n e ig h b o rh o o d c o n tro ls m a y le a d to " o v e

r-m a tc h in g " o n th e s tu d y e x p o s u re if th e e x p o s u re is re la te d to

re s id e n c e .

F rie n d c o n tro ls

T h is s e e m s to b e a n a ttrra c tiv e a lte rn a tiv e fo r c a s e c o n

-tro l s tu d y in te rm s o f re s o u rc e s a n d lo g is tic s a s p e c ts . T h e y

c a n b e s e le c te d fro m a lis t o f frie n d s o r a s s o c ia te s o b ta in e d

fro m th e c a s e . A s th e c a s e a n d frie n d c o n tro l w ill h a v e s im ila r

s o c io e c o n o m ic s ta tu s , th e b ia s e s d u e to s o c ia l c la s s d a re

re d u c e d .T h e y c a n a ls o le a d to o v e rm a tc h in g re g a rd in g fa c

-to rs th a t d e p e n d s o n life -s ty le a n d o c c u p a tio n a l e x p o s u re s .

F rie n d c o n tro ls m a y b e u s e fu l in s o m e c irc u n s ta n c e s , s u c h a s

th e s tu d y o f g e n e tic a l d is o rd e rs .

O th e r ty p e s o f c o n tro l a re a ls o e m p lo y e d in e p id e m io

-lo g ic a l s tu d ie s b a s e d o n d e a th c e rtific a te o r d is e a s e re g is try

lis ts . T h e d e a d c o n tro ls m ig h t b e u s e d w h e n th e c a s e s in th e

s tu d y b u t d ie b e fo re b e in g in te rv ie w e d (6 ). T h e in fo rm a tio n

m ig h t b e o b ta in e d fro m a " p ro x y " in fo rm a n t.

Referências

Documentos relacionados

[r]

[r]

[r]

be explained bythesefour variables known to be associated

In 1994 the insurance plans disbursed about 8 bil- lion U S dollars in health care, in contrast to 6.6 billion spent by the brazilian federal governm ent in 1992.. T his view

T he prevalence of m ental and behavioral disorders, as w ell as the health care to patients w ith these pathologies are being under surveillance in several areas of the w orld m

A ltough H SV has proven to be carcino- genic in vitro and in vivo clinical studies eventually dem on- strated that only a fraction of cervical carcinom as contained traces (viral D N

[r]