• Nenhum resultado encontrado

ROMANTIC RELATIONSHIPS AND CONSUMER BEHAVIOUR: HOW PARTNERS INFLUENCE EACH OTHER IN THEIR ATTITUDES AND PURCHASE INTENTIONS

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2019

Share "ROMANTIC RELATIONSHIPS AND CONSUMER BEHAVIOUR: HOW PARTNERS INFLUENCE EACH OTHER IN THEIR ATTITUDES AND PURCHASE INTENTIONS"

Copied!
131
0
0

Texto

(1)

1 A Work Project, presented as part of the requirements for the Award of a Master Degree in

Management from the NOVA – School of Business and Economics.

ROMANTIC RELATIONSHIPS AND CONSUMER BEHAVIOUR: HOW

PARTNERS INFLUENCE EACH OTHER IN THEIR ATTITUDES AND

PURCHASE INTENTIONS

-

APPENDIX -

MIRJAM SUSANNE MERTEL – 25071

A Project carried out on the Master in Management Program, under the

supervision of:

Luis F. Martinez (Nova SBE) and Aristides I. Ferreira (ISCTE-IUL)

(2)

2

List of Appendices

1. Survey... 4

1.1Questions ... 4

1.2 Composition of Questionnaires ... 14

2. Descriptive Statistics ... 16

2.1 Demographics ... 16

2.2 Frequency Tables Variables ... 18

3. Multivariate Analysis ... 50

3.1 Factor Analysis Group 1: Male Experiment Group Day 1 ... 50

3.2 Factor Analysis Group 1: Male Experiment Group Day 2 ... 58

3.3 Factor Analysis Group 1: Female Control Group Day 1 ... 63

3.4 Factor Analysis Group 1: Female Control Group Day 2 ... 70

3.5 Factor Analysis Group 2: Female Experiment Group Day 1 ... 79

3.6 Factor Analysis Group 2: Female Experiment Group Day 2 ... 87

3.7 Factor Analysis Group 2: Male Control Group Day 1 ... 92

3.8 Factor Analysis Group 2: Male Control Group Day 2 ... 99

4. Item Statistics ... 108

4.1 Ethical Minded Consumer Behaviour ... 108

4.2 Green Product Identification Ability ... 108

4.3 Health Consciousness ... 109

4.4 Health Risk Assessment ... 109

4.5 Attitude towards consuming a Food ... 109

4.6 Edibility of a product ... 110

4.7 Health Benefits of the Product ... 111

4.8Willingness to pay a Price Premium ... 112

5. Correations ... 114

5.1 Correlations Matrix Group 1 ... 114

5.2 Correlations Matrix Group 2 ... 121

6. Hypotheses Testing ... 127

6.1Hypothesis 1 ... 127

6.2 Hypothesis 2: ... 128

6.3 Hypothesis 3 ... 129

(3)

3

Tables Index

Table 1 – Validity and Reliability Group 1 78

Table 2 – Validity and Reliability Group 2 107

(4)

4

1.

Survey

1.1 Questions

Introduction

Dear participant,

First, I would like to thank you for your participation in this Consumer Behaviour Study as part of my master thesis at the Nova School of Business andEconomics in Lisbon.

The study aims at measuring the interdependence of partners in a relationship concerning their consumer behaviour.

In order to track the couples’ influence on each other accordingly, please do not forget to indicate the three-digit couple code that has been sent to you via email in the corresponding field.

The questionnaire will be completely anonymous and the data will only be used for the purpose of this study.

(5)

5

Part 1

Ethical Minded Consumer Behaviour Adapted from Sudbury-Riley & Cohabiter, 2016

Please indicate to which extend you agree with the statements below.

Strongly Agree Neither agree Somewhat Strongly Agree nor disagree disagree disagree

1 2 3 4 5

1. When there is a choice, I always choose the product that contributes to the least amount of environmental damage.

1 2 3 4 5 2. I have switched products for environmental reasons. 1 2 3 4 5 3. If I understand the potential damage to the environment that

some products can cause, I do not purchase those products.

1 2 3 4 5 4. I do not buy household products that harm the environment. 1 2 3 4 5 5. Whenever possible, I buy products packaged in reusable or

recyclable containers.

1 2 3 4 5 6. I make every effort to buy paper products (toilet paper,

tissues, etc.) made from recycled paper.

1 2 3 4 5 7. I will not buy a product if I know that the company that sells

it is socially irresponsible.

1 2 3 4 5 8. I do not buy products from companies that I know use

sweatshop labor, child labor, or other poor working conditions.

1 2 3 4 5

9. I have paid more for environmentally friendly products when there is a cheaper alternative.

1 2 3 4 5 10.I have paid more for socially responsible products when

there is a cheaper alternative.

(6)

6

Part 2

Green Products Identification Ability Adapted from Gleam et al, 2013

Please indicate to which extend you agree with the statements below.

Strongly Agree Neither agree Somewhat Strongly Agree nor disagree disagree disagree

1 2 3 4 5

1. I can recognize green products among other products. 1 2 3 4 5

2. I am aware of green products. 1 2 3 4 5

3. I can identify green products. 1 2 3 4 5

4. I do know the difference between green products and standard products.

(7)

7

Part 3

Health Consciousness

Adapted from Haws and Winterich 2013

Please indicate to which extend you agree with the statements below.

Strongly Agree Neither agree Somewhat Strongly

Agree nor disagree disagree disagree

1 2 3 4 5

1. I reflect about my health a lot. 1 2 3 4 5

2. I'm very self-conscious about my health. 1 2 3 4 5 3. I'm generally attentive to my inner feelings about my health. 1 2 3 4 5

4. I'm constantly examining my health. 1 2 3 4 5

5. I'm alert to changes in my health. 1 2 3 4 5

6. I'm usually aware of my health. 1 2 3 4 5

(8)

8

Part 4

Health Risk Assessment

Adapted from Samper & Schwartz, 2013

How likely are you to have serious health problems in your lifetime?

Extremely Somewhat Neither likely Somewhat Extremely Likely Likely nor unlikely unlikely unlikely

1 2 3 4 5

How applicable is this issue to you?

Extremely Very Moderately Slightly Not at all Applicable applicable applicable applicable applicable 1 2 3 4 5

How serious a threat are serious health problems to you?

Extremely Serious Neither serious Not Definitely Serious nor unserious Serious not serious

(9)

9

Part 5

Attitude towards Consuming the Food – Salmon Adapted from Haws & Winterich, 2013

Please indicate to which extend you agree with the statements below.

Strongly Agree Neither agree Somewhat Strongly Agree nor disagree disagree disagree

2 2 3 4 5

1. Eating salmon would be pleasurable. 1 2 3 4 5

2. I would enjoy eating salmon. 1 2 3 4 5

3. Salmon would be satisfying. 1 2 3 4 5

(10)

10

Part 6

Health Benefits of the Product – Long Term Adapted from Passover & Lee, 2013

While you were viewing the picture of salmon, please describe . . .

A great A lot A moderate A little None at all

deal amount

1 2 3 4 5

1. To what extent were your thoughts about the long-term benefits of consuming salmon?

1 2 3 4 5

2. To what extent were your thoughts about staying healthy in the long run?

1 2 3 4 5

3. To what extent were your thoughts about the long-reaching consequences of your diet?

(11)

11

Part 7

Edibility of the Product

Adapted from Castro, Morales, & Knowles, 2013

How likely are you to ingest this product?

Extremely Somewhat Neither likely Somewhat Extremely Likely Likely nor unlikely unlikely unlikely

1 2 3 4 5

How likely are you to eat this product?

Extremely Somewhat Neither likely Somewhat Extremely Likely Likely nor unlikely unlikely unlikely

1 2 3 4 5

How edible is this product?

A great A lot A moderate A little Not at all

deal amount

(12)

12

Part 8

Willingness to pay a Price Premium Adapted from False, Niemeyer, and Burton, 2012

The price of farmed salmon would have to go up quite a lot before I would

switch to wild salmon.

Strongly Agree Neither agree Somewhat Strongly Agree nor disagree disagree disagree

1 2 3 4 5

I am willing to pay ___% more for wild salmon over farmed salmon.

How much would be available to pay for each product in

/kg?

Farmed Salmon

(13)

13

Part 9

Stimulus

Director: Nicolas Daniel, Original length: 54 min, cut by Mirjam Mertel to 9 mins

(14)

14

Part 10

Demographics

Your couple Code

Sex

Male Female

Age

18-24 25-34 35-44 45-54 55-64 65 – 74 74 and older

Employment

Employed full time

Employed part time

Unemployed looking for work Unemployed not looking for work Retired

Student Disabled

(15)

15 1.2 Composition of Questionnaires

Scale Experiment Group Day I

Experiment Group Day II

Control Group Day 1 Control Group Day II Ethical Minded Consumer Behaviour

X X

Green Products Identification

Ability

X X X X

Health Consciousness

X X

Health Risk Assessment

X X X X

Attitude towards Consuming the

Food

X X X X

Health Benefits of the Product –

Long Term

X X X X

Edibility of the Product

X X X X

Willingness to pay a Price

Premium

X X X X

Stimulus X X

Health Benefits of the Product – Long Term II

X X

Health Risk Assessment II

X

Edibility of the Product II

(16)

16 Willingness to

pay a Price Premium

X

Nr. Items 40 20 37 33

2.

Descriptive Statistics

2.1 Demographics

Gender

Frequency Percent Cumulative Percent

Male 66 50 50

Female 66 50 100

Total 132 100 100

Distribution Groups

Number Couples

Group 1 (Male Experiment Group) 32

Group 2 (Female Experiment Group) 34

Age

Frequency Percent Cumulative Percent

18-24 58 43.9 43.9

25-34 41 31.1 75

35-44 14 10.6 85.6

45-54 5 3.8 89.4

55-64 7 5.3 94.7

(17)

17 Employment

Frequency Percent Cumulative Percent

Employed full time 56 42.4 42.4

Employed part time 8 6.1 48.5

Unemployed looking for work

4 3 51.5

Unemployed not looking for work

0 0 51.5

Retired 5 3.8 55.3

Student

58 44 99.3

Disabled 1 0.7 100

(18)

18

2.2 Frequency Tables Variables

Ethical Minded Consumer Behaviour - Male

1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10.

Percent Percent Percent Percent Percent Percent Percent Percent Percent Percent

1 16.67 15.15 19.71 12.12 12.12 10.61 22.73 21.21 12.12 10.06 2 30.3 25.76 48.50 19.71 28.81 19.71 28.81 28.81 36.36 34.85 3 37.88 18.18 18.18 36.36 36.36 33.33 25.76 28.81 27.27 28.81 4 12.12 22.73 10.61 21.21 16.67 24.24 15.15 18.18 15.15 16.67 5 3.03 18.18 3.03 10.61 6.10 12.12 7.61 3.03 9.09 9.09 Total 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 N=66

1= strongly agree – 5= strongly disagree

1. When there is a choice, I always choose the product that contributes to the least amount of environmental damage. 2. I have switched products for environmental reasons.

3. If I understand the potential damage to the environment that some products can cause, I do not purchase those products. 4. I do not buy household products that harm the environment.

5. Whenever possible, I buy products packaged in reusable or recyclable containers.

6. I make every effort to buy paper products (toilet paper, tissues, etc.) made from recycled paper. 7. I will not buy a product if I know that the company that sells it is socially irresponsible.

8. I do not buy products from companies that I know use sweatshop labour, child labour, or other poor working conditions. 9. I have paid more for environmentally friendly products when there is a cheaper alternative.

10. I have paid more for socially responsible products when there is a cheaper alternative.

Ethical Minded Consumer Behaviour - Female

1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10.

(19)

19 1 9.09 3.03 15.15 0 13.64 7.61 15.15 15.15 16.71 13.64

2 42.42 37.91 50 25.76 45.45 28.81 24.24 39.39 40.91 34.85 3 22.73 25.81 22.73 25.76 13.64 27.27 39.39 15.15 18.18 24.24 4 22.73 22.73 12.12 42.42 24.24 27.27 16.71 27.27 13.64 16.71 5 3.03 10.60 3.03 6.06 3.03 9.09 4.55 3.03 10.61 10.60 Total 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 N=66

1. When there is a choice, I always choose the product that contributes to the least amount of environmental damage. 2. I have switched products for environmental reasons.

3. If I understand the potential damage to the environment that some products can cause, I do not purchase those products. 4. I do not buy household products that harm the environment.

5. Whenever possible, I buy products packaged in reusable or recyclable containers.

6. I make every effort to buy paper products (toilet paper, tissues, etc.) made from recycled paper. 7. I will not buy a product if I know that the company that sells it is socially irresponsible.

8. I do not buy products from companies that I know use sweatshop labour, child labour, or other poor working conditions. 9. I have paid more for environmentally friendly products when there is a cheaper alternative.

10. I have paid more for socially responsible products when there is a cheaper alternative.

Green Products Identification Ability – Male Experiment

Day I Day II

1. I can recognize green products among other products.

2. I am aware of green products.

3. I can identify green products .

4. I do know the difference between green products and standard products.

1. I can recogniz e green products among other products .

2. I am aware of green products . 3. I can identif y green produc ts.

(20)

20 Percent Percent Percent Percent Percent Percent Percent Percent

1 21.86 21.86 28.13 28.13 25 31.25 25 25

2 56.25 59.36 46.88 53.13 56.25 40.63 50 46.88

3 9.38 15.63 21.88 15.63 15.63 21.88 21.88 15.63

4 9.38 0 0 0 3.13 6,25 3.13 12.5

5 3.13 3.13 3.13 3.13 0 0 0 0

Total 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00

(21)

21 Green Products Identification Ability – Female Control

Day I Day II

1. I can recognize green products among other products.

2. I am aware of green products.

3. I can identify green products.

4. I do know the difference between green products and standard products.

1. I can recognize green products among other products.

2. I am aware of green products . 3. I can identi fy green produ cts.

4. I do know the difference between green products and standard products.

Percent Percent Percent Percent Percent Percent Percent Percent

1 18.75 28.13 28.31 25 25 34.38 31.25 31.25

2 46.88 43.75 37.5 53.13 59.41 46.88 46.88 53.13

3 18.75 15.63 21.86 9.38 6.25 9.38 9.38 6.25

4 15.63 6.06 12.5 12.5 6.25 6.25 6.25 6.25

5 0 0 0 0 3.13 3.13 3.13 3.13

Total 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00

(22)

22 Green Products Identification Ability – Female Experiment

Day I Day II

1. I can recogniz e green products among other products .

2. I am aware of green produc ts.

3. I can identify green products.

4. I do know the difference between green products and standard products.

1. I can recognize green products among other products.

2. I am aware of green produc ts.

3. I can identify green products .

4. I do know the difference between green products and standard products.

Percent Percent Percent Percent Percent Percent Percent Percent

1 29.41 35.29 35.29 35.29 35.29 44.12 41.18 35.29

2 64.71 58.82 55.88 52.94 58.82 47.06 50 52.94

3 2.94 0 2.94 0 8.82 5.88 5.88 2.94

4 0 2.94 2.94 5.88 2.94 2.94 0 2.94

5 2.94 2.94 2.94 5.88 0 0 2.94 5.88

(23)

23 Green Products Identification Ability – Male Control

Day I Day II

1. I can recogniz e green products among other products .

2. I am aware of green produc ts.

3. I can identify green products.

4. I do know the difference between green products and standard products.

1. I can recognize green products among other products.

2. I am aware of green product s. 3. I can identif y green produc ts.

4. I do know the difference between green products and standard products.

Percent Percent Percent Percent Percent Percent Percent Percent

1 14.71 20.59 20.59 23.53 29.41 35.29 32.35 32.35

2 44.12 55.89 52.94 41.18 44.12 47.1 47.1 47.06

3 20.59 11.76 14.71 23.53 17.65 11.76 5.88 8.82

4 20.59 11.76 14.71 8.82 8.82 5.88 14.71 11.76

5 0 0 0 2.94 0 0 0 0

Total 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00

Health Consciousness - Male 1. I reflect

about my health a lot.

2. I'm very self-conscious about my health.

3. I'm generally attentive to my inner feelings about my health.

4. I'm constantly examining my health.

5. I'm alert to changes in my health.

6. I'm usually aware of my health.

7. I'm aware of the state of my health as I go through the day.

Percent Percent Percent Percent Percent Percent Percent

(24)

24

2 43.94 48.48 48.48 18.18 59.09 51.52 46.97

3 10.61 10.61 15.15 33.33 9.09 13.64 19.7

4 3.03 4.55 1.52 24.24 9.09 0 3.03

5 0 1.52 0 7.58 0 0 0

Total 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00

(25)

25 Health Consciousness - Female

1. I reflect about my health a lot.

2. I'm very self-conscious about my health.

3. I'm generally attentive to my inner feelings about my health.

4. I'm constantly examining my health.

5. I'm alert to changes in my health.

6. I'm usually aware of my health.

7. I'm aware of the state of my health as I go through the day.

Percent Percent Percent Percent Percent Percent Percent

1 40.9 42.42 27.27 15.15 27.27 45.45 30.30

2 51.52 43.94 54.55 30.30 56.06 45.45 54.55

3 4.55 9.09 13.64 19.70 10.61 6.06 7.58

4 0 1.52 3.03 27.27 3.03 0 4.55

5 3.03 3.03 1.52 7.58 3.03 3.03 3.03

Total 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00

(26)

26 Health Risk Assessment – Male Experiment Group

Day I Day II

1. How likely are you to have serious health problems in your lifetime?

2. How applicable is this issue to you?

3. How serious a threat are serious health problems to you

1. How likely are you to have serious health problems in your lifetime?

2. How applicable is this issue to you?

3. How serious a threat are serious health problems to you

Percent Percent Percent Percent Percent Percent

1 11.76 3.13 9.38 3.13 3.13 9.38

2 18.75 15.63 15.63 37.5 28.13 25

3 24.24 53.13 46.88 50 53.13 40.63

4 9.09 21.88 25 6.25 12.5 21.88

5 0 6.25 3.13 3.13 3.13 3.13

Total 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00

(27)

27 Health Risk Assessment – Female Control Group

Day I Day II

1. How likely are you to have serious health problems in your lifetime?

2. How applicable is this issue to you?

3. How serious a threat are serious health problems to you

1. How likely are you to have serious health problems in your lifetime?

2. How applicable is this issue to you?

3. How serious a threat are serious health problems to you

Percent Percent Percent Percent Percent Percent

1 3.13 0 9.38 9.38 3.13 9.38

2 21.88 15.63 31.25 18.75 12.5 6.25

3 34.38 50 34.38 43.75 62.5 53.13

4 21.88 21.88 12.5 21.88 15.63 25

5 18.75 12.5 12.5 6.25 6.25 6.25

Total 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00

(28)

28 Health Risk Assessment – Female Experiment Group

Day I Day II

1. How likely are you to have serious health problems in your lifetime?

2. How applicable is this issue to you?

3. How serious a threat are serious health problems to you

1. How likely are you to have serious health problems in your lifetime?

2. How applicable is this issue to you?

3. How serious a threat are serious health problems to you

Percent Percent Percent Percent Percent Percent

1 0 0 5.88 0 2.94 2.94

2 29.41 17.65 23.53 29.41 20.59 17.65

3 35.29 38.24 29.42 41.12 29.41 41.18

4 23.53 20.59 23.53 20.59 29.41 26.47

5 11.76 23.53 17.65 8.82 17.65 11.76

Total 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00

(29)

29 Health Risk Assessment – Male Control Group

Day I Day II

1. How likely are you to have serious health problems in your lifetime?

2. How applicable is this issue to you?

3. How serious a threat are serious health problems to you

1. How likely are you to have serious health problems in your lifetime?

2. How applicable is this issue to you?

3. How serious a threat are serious health problems to you

Percent Percent Percent Percent Percent Percent

1 0 0 14.71 2.94 5.88 11.76

2 20.59 11.76 14.71 14.71 8.82 14.71

3 32.35 50 29.41 38.24 50 38.24

4 32.35 23.53 35.29 26.47 26.47 29.41

5 14.71 14.71 5.88 17.65 8.82 5.88

Total 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00

(30)

30 Attitude towards consuming the food – salmon – Male Experiment Group

Day I Day II

1. Eating salmon would be

pleasurable.

2. I would enjoy eating salmon.

3. Salmon would be satisfying.

4. Salmon would taste good.

1. Eating salmon would be pleasurable.

2. I would enjoy eating salmon.

3. Salmon would be satisfying.

4. Salmon would taste good.

Percent Percent Percent Percent Percent Percent Percent Percent

1 53.13 53.13 46.88 56.25 21.88 21.88 21.88 28.13

2 34.38 21.88 25 25 46.88 53.13 43.75 50

3 9.38 18.75 21.88 12.5 25 18.75 18.75 18.75

4 0 3.13 3.13 3.13 6.25 6.25 12.5 0

5 3.13 3.13 3.13 3.13 0 0 3.13 3.13

Total 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00

(31)

31 Attitude towards consuming the food – salmon – Female Control Group

Day I Day II

1. Eating salmon would be

pleasurable.

2. I would enjoy eating salmon.

3. Salmon would be satisfying.

4. Salmon would taste good.

1. Eating salmon would be pleasurable.

2. I would enjoy eating salmon.

3. Salmon would be satisfying.

4. Salmon would taste good.

Percent Percent Percent Percent Percent Percent Percent Percent

1 56.25 56.25 46.88 50 50 53.13 46.88 50

2 18.75 18.75 28.13 31.25 21.88 18.75 21.88 25

3 15.63 15.63 9.38 9.38 18.75 15.63 21.88 12.5

4 9.38 9.38 15.63 9.38 3.13 6.25 3.13 6.25

5 0 0 0 0 6.25 6.25 6.25 6.25

Total 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00

(32)

32 Attitude towards consuming the food – salmon – Female Experiment Group

Day I Day II

1. Eating salmon would be

pleasurable.

2. I would enjoy eating salmon.

3. Salmon would be satisfying.

4. Salmon would taste good.

1. Eating salmon would be pleasurable.

2. I would enjoy eating salmon.

3. Salmon would be satisfying.

4. Salmon would taste good.

Percent Percent Percent Percent Percent Percent Percent Percent

1 50.0 50.0 44.1 47.1 35.3 35.3 32.4 47.1

2 26.5 23.5 23.5 29.4 35.3 35.3 32.4 23.5

3 5.9 8.8 14.7 8.8 14.7 11.8 17.6 20.6

4 14.7 14.7 14.7 11.8 11.8 11.8 14.7 5.9

5 2.9 2.9 2.9 2.9 2.9 5.9 2.9 2.9

Total 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00

(33)

33 Attitude towards consuming the food – salmon – Male Control Group

Day I Day II

1. Eating salmon would be

pleasurable.

2. I would enjoy eating salmon.

3. Salmon would be satisfying.

4. Salmon would taste good.

1. Eating salmon would be pleasurable.

2. I would enjoy eating salmon.

3. Salmon would be satisfying.

4. Salmon would taste good.

Percent Percent Percent Percent Percent Percent Percent Percent

1 47.1 44.1 38.2 38.2 35.3 38.2 38.2 44.1

2 23.5 26.5 26.5 35.3 32.4 26.5 23.5 32.3

3 11.8 11.8 11.8 8.8 20.6 20.6 23.5 8.8

4 8.8 5.9 11.8 8.8 5.9 5.9 5.9 5.9

5 8.8 11.8 11.8 8.8 5.9 8.8 8.8 8.8

Total 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00

(34)

34 Health Benefits of the Product - Long Term – Male Experiment Group

Day I Day II

1. To what extent were your thoughts about the long-term benefits of

consuming salmon?

2. To what extent were your thoughts about staying healthy in the long run?

3. To what extent were your thoughts about the long-reaching

consequences of your diet?

1. To what extent were your thoughts about the long-term benefits of

consuming salmon?

2. To what extent were your

thoughts about staying healthy in the long run?

3. To what extent were your thoughts about the long-reaching

consequences of your diet?

Percent Percent Percent Percent Percent Percent

1 6.25 6.25 6.25 9.38 15.63 12.5

2 21.88 34.38 28.13 31.25 46.88 34.38

3 28.13 34.38 40.63 34.38 21.88 34.38

4 25 12.5 15.63 21.88 12.5 18.75

5 18.75 12.5 9.38 3.13 3.13 0

Total 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00

(35)

35 Health Benefits of the Product - Long Term – Female Control Group

Day I Day II

1. To what extent were your thoughts about the long-term benefits of

consuming salmon?

2. To what extent were your thoughts about staying healthy in the long run?

3. To what extent were your thoughts about the long-reaching

consequences of your diet?

1. To what extent were your thoughts about the long-term benefits of

consuming salmon?

2. To what extent were your

thoughts about staying healthy in the long run?

3. To what extent were your thoughts about the long-reaching

consequences of your diet?

Percent Percent Percent Percent Percent Percent

1 15.63 25 21.88 21.88 25 12.5

2 21.88 31.25 40.63 15.63 31.25 50

3 18.75 25 15.63 31.25 18.75 25

4 25 6.25 6.25 15.63 18.75 0

5 18.75 12.5 15.63 15.63 6.25 12.5

Total 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00

(36)

36 Health Benefits of the Product - Long Term – Female Experiment Group

Day I Day II

1. To what extent were your thoughts about the long-term benefits of

consuming salmon?

2. To what extent were your thoughts about staying healthy in the long run?

3. To what extent were your thoughts about the long-reaching

consequences of your diet?

1. To what extent were your thoughts about the long-term benefits of

consuming salmon?

2. To what extent were your

thoughts about staying healthy in the long run?

3. To what extent were your thoughts about the long-reaching

consequences of your diet?

Percent Percent Percent Percent Percent Percent

1 29.4 14.7 26.5 11.8 20.6 17.6

2 14.7 20.6 17.6 20.6 29.4 32.4

3 26.4 17.6 26.5 32.4 26.5 41.2

4 17.6 32.4 17.6 20.6 14.7 8.8

5 11.8 14.7 11.8 14.7 8.8 0

Total 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00

(37)

37 Health Benefits of the Product - Long Term – Male Control Group

Day I Day II

1. To what extent were your thoughts about the long-term benefits of

consuming salmon?

2. To what extent were your thoughts about staying healthy in the long run?

3. To what extent were your thoughts about the long-reaching

consequences of your diet?

1. To what extent were your thoughts about the long-term benefits of

consuming salmon?

2. To what extent were your

thoughts about staying healthy in the long run?

3. To what extent were your thoughts about the long-reaching

consequences of your diet?

Percent Percent Percent Percent Percent Percent

1 20.6 23.5 20.6 14.7 20.6 17.6

2 20.6 23.5 26.5 14.7 26.5 32.4

3 5.9 26.5 29.4 44.1 44.1 41.2

4 29.4 11.8 14.7 8.8 5.9 8.8

5 23.5 14.7 8.8 17.6 2.9 0

Total 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00

(38)

38 Edibility of the Product – Male Experiment Group

Day I Day II

1. How likely are you to ingest this product?

2. How likely are you to eat this product?

3. How edible is this product?

1. How likely are you to ingest this product?

2. How likely are you to eat this product?

3. How edible is this product?

Percent Percent Percent Percent Percent Percent

1 31.25 31.25 43.75 9.38 12.5 6.25

2 50 59.38 34.38 53.13 53.13 34.38

3 12.5 3.13 15.63 18.75 9.38 21.88

4 0 0 3.13 12.5 15.63 21.88

5 6.25 6.25 3.13 6.25 9.38 15.63

Total 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00

(39)

39 Edibility of the Product – Female Control Group

Day I Day II

1. How likely are you to ingest this product?

2. How likely are you to eat this product?

3. How edible is this product?

1. How likely are you to ingest this product?

2. How likely are you to eat this product?

3. How edible is this product?

Percent Percent Percent Percent Percent Percent

1 37.5 43.75 31.25 28.13 34.38 34.38

2 40.63 37.5 31.25 46.88 34.38 31.25

3 18.75 15.63 34.38 18.75 18.75 25

4 3.13 3.13 3.13 3.13 9.38 6.25

5 0 0 0 3.13 3.13 3.13

Total 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00

(40)

40 Edibility of the Product – Female Experiment Group

Day I Day II

1. How likely are you to ingest this product?

2. How likely are you to eat this product?

3. How edible is this product?

1. How likely are you to ingest this product?

2. How likely are you to eat this product?

3. How edible is this product?

Percent Percent Percent Percent Percent Percent

1 44.1 41.2 52.9 23.5 20.6 29.4

2 26.5 35.3 23.5 38.2 44.1 44.1

3 11.8 5.9 11.8 14.7 11.8 8.8

4 14.7 14.7 8.8 14.7 17.6 11.8

5 2.9 2.9 2.9 8.8 5.9 5.9

Total 100.0 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00

(41)

41 Edibility of the Product – Male Control Group

Day I Day II

1. How likely are you to ingest this product?

2. How likely are you to eat this product?

3. How edible is this product?

1. How likely are you to ingest this product?

2. How likely are you to eat this product?

3. How edible is this product?

Percent Percent Percent Percent Percent Percent

1 32.4 29.4 35.3 29.4 32.4 32.4

2 35.3 44.1 35.3 35.3 29.4 29.4

3 11.8 8.8 17.6 11.8 23.5 23.5

4 11.8 8.8 5.9 14.7 5.9 5.9

5 8.8 8.8 5.9 8.8 8.8 8.8

Total 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00

(42)

42 Willingness to pay a Price Premium

Willingness to pay a Price Premium 1 – Group 1 (Male Experiment – Female Control) “I am willing to pay more for wild salmon than for farmed salmon.“

Male Experiment Group Day I

Male Experiment Group Day II

Female Control Group Day I

Female Control Group Day II

Female Control Group after watching Video

Percent Percent Percent Percent Percent

1 25 34.38 9.38 28.13 53.13

2 46.88 46.88 59.38 37.5 25

3 18.75 12.5 28.13 21.88 18.75

4 6.25 6.25 0 9.38 0

5 3.13 0 3.13 3.13 3.13

Total 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00

(43)

43 Willingness to pay a Price Premium 1 – Group 2 (Female Experiment – Male Control)

“I am willing to pay more for wild salmon than for farmed salmon “

Female Experiment Group Day I

Female Experiment Group Day II

Male Control Group Day I

Male Control Group Day II

Male Control Group after watching Video

Percent Percent Percent Percent Percent

1 23.5 32.4 20.6 20.6 38.2

2 29.4 44.1 35.5 41.1 35.3

3 14.7 14.7 20.6 11.8 17.6

4 23.5 5.9 17.6 14.7 2.9

5 8.8 2.9 5.9 11.8 5.9

Total 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00

(44)

44 Willingness to pay a Price Premium 2 – Group 1 (Male Experiment – Female Control)

“I am willing to pay ___% more for wild salmon over farmed salmon.“

Male Experiment Group Day I

Male Experiment Group Day II

Female Control Group Day I

Female Control Group Day II

Female Control Group after watching Video

Percent Percent Percent Percent Percent

0 – 20 % 56.3 40.6 56.3 46.9 31.3

20 – 30 % 18.7 12.5 31.2 25 6.2

30 – 50% 18.8 40.7 12.5 28.1 50

50 – 80% 3.1 0 0 0 9.4

80 – 200% 3.1 6.2 0 0 3.1

Total 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00

(45)

45 Willingness to pay a Price Premium 2 – Group 2 (Female Experiment – Male Control)

“I am willing to pay ___% more for wild salmon over farmed salmon.“

Female Experiment Group Day I

Female Experiment Group Day II

Male Control Group Day I

Male Control Group Day II

Male Control Group after watching Video

Percent Percent Percent Percent Percent

0 – 20 % 61.8 52.9 61.8 50.0 41.2

20 – 30 % 11.7 17.7 17.6 23.5 17.6

30 – 50% 14.7 14.7 17.6 20.6 14.8

50 – 80% 5.9 5.9 14.7 0 17.6

80 – 200% 5.9 5.9 2.9 5.9 8.8

Total 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00

(46)

46 Willingness to pay a Price Premium 2 – Group 1 (Male Experiment – Female Control)

“How much would be available to pay for each product in €/kg?”

Farmed Salmon

Male Experiment Group Day I

Male Experiment Group Day II

Female Control Group Day I

Female Control Group Day II

Female Control Group after watching Video

Percent Percent Percent Percent Percent

0 – 5 9.4 9.4 3.1 12.5 15.6

5 – 10 46.9 43.7 40.7 46.9 46.9

10 – 15 28.1 31.3 37.5 31.2 25

15 – 20 6.2 6.2 9.3 0 0

20 - >20 9.4 9.4 9.4 9.4 12.5

Total 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00

(47)

47 Willingness to pay a Price Premium 2 – Group 1 (Male Experiment – Female Control)

“How much would be available to pay for each product in €/kg?”

Wild Salmon

Male Experiment Group Day I

Male Experiment Group Day II

Female Control Group Day I

Female Control Group Day II

Female Control Group after watching Video

Percent Percent Percent Percent Percent

0 – 5 0 0 3.1 3.1 3.1

5 – 10 18.8 25.0 25 18.8 18.8

10 – 15 34.3 28.1 21.9 28.1 28.1

15 – 20 28.2 28.2 31.3 34.4 31.3

20 - >20 18.7 18.7 18.7 15.6 18.7

Total 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00

(48)

48 Willingness to pay a Price Premium 2 – Group 2 (Female Experiment – Male Control)

“How much would be available to pay for each product in €/kg?”

Farmed Salmon

Female

Experiment Group Day I

Female Experiment Group Day II

Male Control Group Day I

Male Control Group Day II

Male Control Group after watching Video

Percent Percent Percent Percent Percent

0 – 5 17.6 20.6 23.5 23.5 29.4

5 – 10 50.0 61.8 35.3 26.5 44.1

10 – 15 17.6 5.9 23.5 29.4 11.8

15 – 20 8.8 5.9 11.7 11.8 8.8

20 - >20 5.9 5.9 5.9 8.8 5.9

Total 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00

(49)

49 Willingness to pay a Price Premium 2 – Group 2 (Female Experiment – Male Control)

“How much would be available to pay for each product in €/kg?”

Wild Salmon

Female

Experiment Group Day I

Female Experiment Group Day II

Male Control Group Day I

Male Control Group Day II

Male Control Group after watching Video

Percent Percent Percent Percent Percent

0 – 5 2.9 5.9 11.8 8.8 5.9

5 – 10 32.4 26.5 29.4 23.6 20.9

10 – 15 26.5 29.4 23.5 20.5 17.6

15 – 20 23.5 23.5 17.7 26.5 23.5

20 - >20 14.7 14.7 17.7 20.6 32.4

Total 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00

(50)

50

3.

Multivariate Analysis

3.1 Factor Analysis Group 1: Male Experiment Group Day 1

Factor Analysis of Ethical Consumer Behaviour Male Experiment Day 1

Total Variance Explained

Initial Eigenvalues Extraction Sums of Squared Loadings Component Total % of Variance Cumulative % Total % of Variance Cumulative %

1 4.701 47.008 47.008 4.701 47.008 47.008

2 1.532 15.32 62.328 1.532 15.32 62.328

3 0.972 9.721 72.049

4 0.748 7.483 79.532

5 0.618 6.18 85.712

6 0.432 4.317 90.029

7 0.423 4.23 94.26

8 0.287 2.865 97.125

9 0.194 1.936 99.061

10 0.094 0.939 100

Extraction Method: Principal Component Analysis.

Reliability Statistics

Cronbach's Alpha N of Items

0.865 10

KMO and Bartlett's Test

Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin Measure of Sampling

Adequacy. 0.758

Bartlett's Test of Sphericity Approx. Chi-Square 155.175

df 45

(51)

51

Factor Analysis of Green Products Identification Ability Male Experiment Day 1

Total Variance Explained

Initial Eigenvalues Extraction Sums of Squared Loadings Component Total % of Variance Cumulative % Total % of Variance Cumulative %

1 2.68 66.996 66.996 2.68 66.996 66.996

2 0.79 19.742 86.737

3 0.381 9.516 96.253

4 0.15 3.747 100

Extraction Method: Principal Component Analysis.

KMO and Bartlett's Test

Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin Measure of Sampling Adequacy. 0.697 Bartlett's Test of Sphericity Approx. Chi-Square 60.961

df 6

Sig. 0

Reliability Statistics

Cronbach's Alpha N of Items

(52)

52

Factor Analysis of Health Consciousness Male Experiment Day 1

Total Variance Explained

Initial Eigenvalues Extraction Sums of Squared Loadings

Component Total % of Variance Cumulative % Total % of Variance Cumulative %

1 2.884 41.195 41.195 2.884 41.195 41.195

2 1.163 16.621 57.816 1.163 16.621 57.816

3 0,89 12.717 70.533

4 0,8 11.434 81.967

5 0.534 7.624 89.591

6 0.491 7.016 96.608

7 0.237 3.392 100

Extraction Method: Principal Component Analysis.

a When components are correlated, sums of squared loadings cannot be added to obtain a total variance.

KMO and Bartlett's Test

Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin Measure of Sampling Adequacy. 0.599

Bartlett's Test of Sphericity Approx. Chi-Square 53.028

df 21

Sig. 0

Reliability Statistics

Cronbach's Alpha N of Items

(53)

53

Factor Analysis of Health Risk Assessment Male Experiment Day 1

Total Variance Explained

Initial Eigenvalues Extraction Sums of Squared Loadings Component Total % of Variance Cumulative % Total % of Variance Cumulative %

1 1.904 63.477 63.477 1.904 63.477 63.477

2 0.73 24.322 87.799

3 0.366 12.201 100

Extraction Method: Principal Component Analysis.

KMO and Bartlett's Test

Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin Measure of Sampling Adequacy. 0.586

Bartlett's Test of Sphericity Approx. Chi-Square 19.719

df 3

Sig. 0

Reliability Statistics

Cronbach's Alpha N of Items

(54)

54

Factor Analysis of Attitude towards consuming the food Male Experiment Day 1

Total Variance Explained

Initial Eigenvalues Extraction Sums of Squared Loadings

Component Total % of Variance Cumulative % Total % of Variance Cumulative %

1 3.34 83.503 83.503 3,34 83.503 83.503

2 0.351 8.764 92.267

3 0.236 5.893 98.16

4 0.074 1.84 100

Extraction Method: Principal Component Analysis.

KMO and Bartlett's Test

Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin Measure of Sampling Adequacy. 0.752

Bartlett's Test of Sphericity Approx. Chi-Square 112.345

df 6

Sig. 0

Reliability Statistics

Cronbach's Alpha N of Items

(55)

55

Factor Analysis of Edibility of the food Male Experiment Day 1

Total Variance Explained

Initial Eigenvalues Extraction Sums of Squared Loadings Component Total % of Variance Cumulative % Total % of Variance Cumulative %

1 1.968 65.601 65.601 1,968 65.601 65.601

2 0.989 32.982 98.583

3 0.043 1.417 100

Extraction Method: Principal Component Analysis.

KMO and Bartlett's Test

Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin Measure of Sampling Adequacy. 0.493

Bartlett's Test of Sphericity Approx. Chi-Square 72.666

df 3

Sig. 0

Reliability Statistics

Cronbach's Alpha N of Items

(56)

56

Factor Analysis of Health Benefits of the Product

Total Variance Explained

Initial Eigenvalues Extraction Sums of Squared Loadings Component Total % of Variance Cumulative % Total % of Variance Cumulative %

1 2.413 80.449 80.449 2,413 80.449 80.449

2 0.331 11.044 91.493

3 0.255 8.507 100

Extraction Method: Principal Component Analysis.

KMO and Bartlett's Test

Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin Measure of Sampling Adequacy. 0.739

Bartlett's Test of Sphericity Approx. Chi-Square 46.353

df 3

Sig. 0

Reliability Statistics

Cronbach's Alpha N of Items

(57)

57

Factor Analysis of Health Benefits of the Product (after exposure so stimulus)

Total Variance Explained

Initial Eigenvalues Extraction Sums of Squared Loadings Component Total % of Variance Cumulative % Total % of Variance Cumulative %

1 2.317 77.237 77.237 2.317 77.237 77.237

2 0.459 15.311 92.548

3 0.224 7.452 100

Extraction Method: Principal Component Analysis.

KMO and Bartlett's Test

Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin Measure of Sampling Adequacy. 0.692

Bartlett's Test of Sphericity Approx. Chi-Square 41.876

df 3

Sig. 0

Reliability Statistics

Cronbach's Alpha N of Items

(58)

58

3.2 Factor Analysis Group 1: Male Experiment Group Day 2

Factor Analysis of Green Products Identification Ability

Total Variance Explained

Initial Eigenvalues Extraction Sums of Squared Loadings Component Total % of Variance Cumulative % Total % of Variance Cumulative %

1 3.002 75.061 75.061 3.002 75.061 75.061

2 0.536 13.393 88.455

3 0.313 7.835 96.29

4 0.148 3.71 100

Extraction Method: Principal Component Analysis.

KMO and Bartlett's Test

Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin Measure of Sampling Adequacy. 0.798

Bartlett's Test of Sphericity Approx. Chi-Square 74.757

df 6

Sig. 0

Reliability Statistics

Cronbach's Alpha N of Items

(59)

59

Factor Analysis of Health Risk Assessment

Total Variance Explained

Initial Eigenvalues Extraction Sums of Squared Loadings Component Total % of Variance Cumulative % Total % of Variance Cumulative %

1 1,963 65.447 65.447 1.963 65.447 65.447

2 0.69 23.014 88.461

3 0.346 11.539 100

Extraction Method: Principal Component Analysis.

KMO and Bartlett's Test

Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin Measure of Sampling Adequacy. 0.601

Bartlett's Test of Sphericity Approx. Chi-Square 22.068

df 3

Sig. 0

Reliability Statistics

Cronbach's Alpha N of Items

(60)

60

Factor Analysis of Attitude towards consuming the food

Total Variance Explained

Initial Eigenvalues Extraction Sums of Squared Loadings Component Total % of Variance Cumulative % Total % of Variance

Cumulative %

1 2.568 64.189 64.189 2.568 64.189 64.189

2 0.697 17.435 81.624

3 0.404 10.111 91.735

4 0.331 8.265 100

Extraction Method: Principal Component Analysis.

KMO and Bartlett's Test

Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin Measure of Sampling Adequacy. 0.746

Bartlett's Test of Sphericity Approx. Chi-Square 41.218

df 6

Sig. 0

Reliability Statistics

Cronbach's Alpha N of Items

(61)

61

Factor Analysis of Edibility of the food

Total Variance Explained

Initial Eigenvalues Extraction Sums of Squared Loadings Component Total % of Variance Cumulative % Total % of Variance Cumulative %

1 2.484 82.814 82.814 2.484 82.814 82.814

2 0.409 13.65 96.464

3 0.106 3.536 100

Extraction Method: Principal Component Analysis.

KMO and Bartlett's Test

Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin Measure of Sampling Adequacy. 0.687

Bartlett's Test of Sphericity Approx. Chi-Square 64.932

df 3

Sig. 0

Reliability Statistics

Cronbach's Alpha N of Items

(62)

62

Factor Analysis of Health Benefits of the Product

Total Variance Explained

Initial Eigenvalues Extraction Sums of Squared Loadings Component Total % of Variance Cumulative % Total % of Variance Cumulative %

1 2.361 78.687 78.687 2.361 78.687 78.687

2 0.468 15.584 94.27

3 0.172 5.73 100

Extraction Method: Principal Component Analysis.

KMO and Bartlett's Test

Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin Measure of Sampling Adequacy. 0.675

Bartlett's Test of Sphericity Approx. Chi-Square 48.484

df 3

Sig. 0

Reliability Statistics

Cronbach's Alpha N of Items

(63)

63

3.3 Factor Analysis Group 1: Female Control Group Day 1

Factor Analysis of Ethical Consumer Behaviour

KMO and Bartlett's Test

Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin Measure of Sampling Adequacy. 0.617

Bartlett's Test of Sphericity Approx. Chi-Square 78.891

df 45

Sig. 0.001

Reliability Statistics

Cronbach's Alpha N of Items

0.715 10

Total Variance Explained

Initial Eigenvalues

Extraction Sums of Squared Loadings

Rotation Sums of Squared Loadingsa

Component Total

% of Variance

Cumulative

% Total

% of Variance

Cumulative

% Total

1 2.985 29.847 29.847 2.985 29.847 29.847 2,495

2 1.626 16.262 46.109 1.626 16.262 46.109 2,038

3 1.466 14.659 60.768 1.466 14.659 60.768 1,685

4 1.074 10.736 71.505 1.074 10.736 71.505 1,334

5 0.788 7.884 79.388

6 0.606 6.055 85.443

7 0.562 5.615 91.059

8 0.348 3.484 94.543

9 0.292 2.918 97.461

(64)

64

Factor Analysis of Green Products Identification Ability

Total Variance Explained

Initial Eigenvalues

Extraction Sums of Squared Loadings

Component Total % of Variance Cumulative % Total % of Variance

Cumulative %

1 2.979 74.48 74.48 2.979 74.48 74.48

2 0.526 13.151 87.632

3 0.37 9.248 96.879

4 0.125 3.121 100

Extraction Method: Principal Component Analysis.

KMO and Bartlett's Test

Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin Measure of Sampling Adequacy. 0.685

Bartlett's Test of Sphericity Approx. Chi-Square 75.718

df 6

Sig. 0

Reliability Statistics

Cronbach's Alpha N of Items

(65)

65

Factor Analysis of Health Consciousness

Total Variance Explained

Initial Eigenvalues Extraction Sums of Squared Loadings Component Total % of Variance Cumulative % Total % of Variance Cumulative %

1 4.386 62.655 62.655 4.386 62.655 62.655

2 0.794 11.337 73.992

3 0.572 8.172 82.164

4 0.496 7.088 89.252

5 0.391 5.592 94.845

6 0.221 3.155 98

7 0.14 2 100

Extraction Method: Principal Component Analysis.

KMO and Bartlett's Test

Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin Measure of Sampling Adequacy. 0.801 Bartlett's Test of Sphericity Approx. Chi-Square 123.198

df 21

Sig. 0

Reliability Statistics

Cronbach's Alpha N of Items

(66)

66

Factor Analysis of Health Risk Assessment

Total Variance Explained

Initial Eigenvalues Extraction Sums of Squared Loadings Component Total % of Variance Cumulative % Total % of Variance Cumulative %

1 2.086 69.521 69.521 2.086 69.521 69.521

2 0.696 23.193 92.714

3 0.219 7.286 100

Extraction Method: Principal Component Analysis.

KMO and Bartlett's Test

Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin Measure of Sampling Adequacy. 0.533 Bartlett's Test of Sphericity Approx. Chi-Square 33.49

df 3

Sig. 0

Reliability Statistics

Cronbach's

Alpha N of Items

(67)

67

Factor Analysis of Attitude Towards Consuming the Food

Total Variance Explained

Initial Eigenvalues Extraction Sums of Squared Loadings Component Total % of Variance Cumulative % Total % of Variance Cumulative %

1 3.546 88.66 88.66 3.546 88.66 88.66

2 0.257 6.427 95.086

3 0.177 4.43 99.516

4 0.019 0.484 100

Extraction Method: Principal Component Analysis.

KMO and Bartlett's Test

Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin Measure of Sampling Adequacy. 0.686 Bartlett's Test of Sphericity Approx. Chi-Square 166.316

df 6

Sig. 0

Reliability Statistics

Cronbach's Alpha N of Items

(68)

68

Factor Analysis of Health Benefits of the Product

Total Variance Explained

Initial Eigenvalues

Extraction Sums of Squared Loadings

Component Total % of Variance Cumulative % Total % of Variance

Cumulative %

1 2.536 84.53 84.53 2.536 84,53 84,53

2 0.334 11.117 95.646

3 0.131 4.354 100

Extraction Method: Principal Component Analysis.

KMO and Bartlett's Test

Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin Measure of Sampling

Adequacy. 0.712

Bartlett's Test of Sphericity Approx. Chi-Square 64.257

df 3

Sig. 0

Reliability Statistics

Cronbach's Alpha N of Items

(69)

69

Factor Analysis of Edibility of the Food

KMO and Bartlett's Test

Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin Measure of Sampling Adequacy. 0.614 Bartlett's Test of Sphericity Approx. Chi-Square 46.784

df 3

Sig. 0

Reliability Statistics

Cronbach's Alpha N of Items

0.823 3

Total Variance Explained

Initial Eigenvalues Extraction Sums of Squared Loadings

Component Total % of Variance Cumulative % Total % of Variance

Cumulative %

1 2.245 74.847 74.847 2.245 74.847 74,847

2 0.607 20.235 95.083

3 0.148 4.917 100

(70)

70

3.4 Factor Analysis Group 1: Female Control Group Day 2

Factor Analysis Green Products Identification Ability

Total Variance Explained

Initial Eigenvalues Extraction Sums of Squared Loadings Component Total % of Variance Cumulative % Total % of Variance Cumulative %

1 3.616 90.39 90.39 3.616 90.39 90.39

2 0.176 4.405 94.795

3 0.119 2.984 97.779

4 0.089 2.221 100

Extraction Method: Principal Component Analysis.

KMO and Bartlett's Test

Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin Measure of Sampling Adequacy. 0.614

Bartlett's Test of Sphericity Approx. Chi-Square 144.088

df 6

Sig. 0

Reliability Statistics

Cronbach's Alpha N of Items

(71)

71

Factor Analysis Health Risk Assessment

Total Variance Explained

Initial Eigenvalues Extraction Sums of Squared Loadings Component Total % of Variance Cumulative % Total % of Variance Cumulative %

1 2.13 71.002 71.002 2.13 71.002 71.002

2 0.516 17.203 88.205

3 0.354 11.795 100

Extraction Method: Principal Component Analysis.

KMO and Bartlett's Test

Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin Measure of Sampling Adequacy. 0.689 Bartlett's Test of Sphericity Approx. Chi-Square 27.539

df 3

Sig. 0

Reliability Statistics

Cronbach's Alpha N of Items

(72)

72

Factor Analysis Attitude towards Consuming the Food

Total Variance Explained

Initial Eigenvalues Extraction Sums of Squared Loadings Component Total % of Variance Cumulative % Total % of Variance Cumulative %

1 3.827 95.677 95.677 3.827 95.677 95.677

2 0.117 2.915 98.591

3 0.042 1.061 99.652

4 0.014 0.348 100

Extraction Method: Principal Component Analysis.

KMO and Bartlett's Test

Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin Measure of Sampling Adequacy. 0.828 Bartlett's Test of Sphericity Approx. Chi-Square 237.654

df 6

Sig. 0

Reliability Statistics

Cronbach's Alpha N of Items

(73)

73

Factor Analysis Health Benefits of the Product

Total Variance Explained

Initial Eigenvalues Extraction Sums of Squared Loadings Component Total % of Variance Cumulative % Total % of Variance Cumulative %

1 2.144 71.454 71.454 2.144 71.454 71.454

2 0.582 19.413 90.867

3 0.274 9.133 100

Extraction Method: Principal Component Analysis.

KMO and Bartlett's Test

Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin Measure of Sampling Adequacy. 0.634

Bartlett's Test of Sphericity Approx. Chi-Square 31.29

df 3

Sig. 0

Reliability Statistics

Cronbach's Alpha N of Items

(74)

74

Factor Analysis Edibility of the Product

Total Variance Explained

Initial Eigenvalues Extraction Sums of Squared Loadings Component Total % of Variance Cumulative % Total % of Variance Cumulative %

1 2.673 89.092 89.092 2.673 89.092 89.092

2 0.213 7.11 96.202

3 0.114 3.798 100

Extraction Method: Principal Component Analysis.

KMO and Bartlett's Test

Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin Measure of Sampling Adequacy. 0.746 Bartlett's Test of Sphericity Approx. Chi-Square 79.742

df 3

Sig. 0

Reliability Statistics

Cronbach's Alpha N of Items

(75)

75

Factor Analysis Health Benefits of the Product (after watching video)

Total Variance Explained

Initial Eigenvalues Extraction Sums of Squared Loadings Component Total % of Variance Cumulative % Total % of Variance Cumulative %

1 2.111 70.376 70.376 2.111 70.376 70.376

2 0.684 22.794 93.171

3 0.205 6.829 100

Extraction Method: Principal Component Analysis.

KMO and Bartlett's Test

Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin Measure of Sampling Adequacy. 0.616 Bartlett's Test of Sphericity Approx. Chi-Square 35.527

df 3

Sig. 0

Reliability Statistics

Cronbach's Alpha N of Items

(76)

76

Factor Analysis Health Risk Assessment (after watching video)

Total Variance Explained

Initial Eigenvalues Extraction Sums of Squared Loadings Component Total % of Variance Cumulative % Total % of Variance Cumulative %

1 2.217 73.888 73.888 2,217 73.888 73.888

2 0.597 19.902 93.79

3 0.186 6.21 100

Extraction Method: Principal Component Analysis.

KMO and Bartlett's Test

Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin Measure of Sampling Adequacy. 0.634 Bartlett's Test of Sphericity Approx. Chi-Square 40.838

df 3

Sig. 0

Reliability Statistics

Cronbach's Alpha N of Items

(77)

77

Factor Analysis Edibility Product (after watching video)

Total Variance Explained

Initial Eigenvalues Extraction Sums of Squared Loadings Component Total % of Variance Cumulative % Total % of Variance Cumulative %

1 2.442 81.395 81.395 2.442 81.395 81.395

2 0.423 14.1 95.495

3 0.135 4.505 100

Extraction Method: Principal Component Analysis.

KMO and Bartlett's Test

Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin Measure of Sampling Adequacy. 0.672 Bartlett's Test of Sphericity Approx. Chi-Square 57.429

df 3

Sig. 0

Reliability Statistics

Cronbach's Alpha N of Items

(78)

78

Overview reliability and validity Group 1

Scale Day Gender

Cronbach's

alpha KMO Significance value

EMCB 1 Male 0.865 0.758 p < 0.001

1 Female 0.715 0.617 p < 0.001

GPI 1 Male 0.827 0.697 p < 0.001

2 Male 0.878 0.798 p < 0.001

1 Female 0.884 0.685 p < 0.001

2 Female 0.964 0.872 p < 0.001

HC 1 Male 0.738 0.599 p < 0.001

1 Female 0.890 0.801 p < 0.001

HRA 1 Male 0.706 0.586 p < 0.001

2 Male 0.721 0.601 p < 0.001

1 Female 0.755 0.533 p < 0.001

2 Female 0.786 0.689 p < 0.001

ATCF 1 Male 0.932 0.752 p < 0.001

2 Male 0.811 0.746 p < 0.001

1 Female 0.956 0.686 p < 0.001

2 Female 0.985 0.828 p < 0.001

HBP 1 Male 0.876 0.739 p < 0.001

2 Male 0.861 0.675 p < 0.001

1 Female 0.907 0.712 p < 0.001

2 Female 0.790 0.634 p < 0.001

EP 1 Male 0.633 0.493 p < 0.001

2 Male 0.890 0.687 p < 0.001

1 Female 0.823 0.614 p < 0.001

2 Female 0.937 0.746 p < 0.001

IIHBP 1 Male 0.838 0.692 p < 0.001

2 Female 0.773 0.616 p < 0.001

IIHRA 2 Female 0.816 0.634 p < 0.001

IIEP 2 Female 0.883 0.672 p < 0.001

N = 32

KMO: 0.5 - 0.7 mediocre

KMO: 0.7 - 0.8 good

KMO: 0.8 - 0.9 great

Sig. Value < 0.05

(79)

79

3.5 Factor Analysis Group 2: Female Experiment Group Day 1

Factor Analysis Ethical Minded Consumer Behaviour

Total Variance Explained

Initial Eigenvalues Extraction Sums of Squared Loadings

Component Total % of Variance Cumulative % Total % of Variance Cumulative %

1 4.439 44.394 44.394 4.439 44.394 44.394

2 1.395 13.951 58.345 1.395 13.951 58.345

3 1.117 11.17 69.514 1.117 11.17 69.514

4 0.843 8.426 77.94

5 0.574 5.735 83.675

6 0.503 5.027 88.702

7 0.407 4.068 92.771

8 0.37 3.699 96.47

9 0.202 2.022 98.492

10 0.151 1.508 100

Extraction Method: Principal Component Analysis.

a When components are correlated, sums of squared loadings cannot be added to obtain a total variance.

KMO and Bartlett's Test

Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin Measure of Sampling Adequacy. 0.768 Bartlett's Test of Sphericity Approx. Chi-Square 140.275

df 45

Sig. 0

Reliability Statistics

Cronbach's Alpha N of Items

(80)

80

Factor Analysis Green Products Identification Ability

Total Variance Explained

Initial Eigenvalues Extraction Sums of Squared Loadings Component Total % of Variance Cumulative % Total % of Variance Cumulative %

1 3.159 78.981 78.981 3.159 78.981 78.981

2 0.475 11.865 90.846

3 0.259 6.477 97.323

4 0.107 2.677 100

Extraction Method: Principal Component Analysis.

KMO and Bartlett's Test

Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin Measure of Sampling Adequacy. 0.806 Bartlett's Test of Sphericity Approx. Chi-Square 98.047

df 6

Sig. 0

Reliability Statistics

Cronbach's Alpha N of Items

(81)

81

Factor Analysis Health Consciousness

Total Variance Explained

Initial Eigenvalues Extraction Sums of Squared Loadings Component Total % of Variance Cumulative % Total % of Variance Cumulative %

1 2.949 42.135 42.135 2.949 42.135 42.135

2 1.206 17.234 59.368 1.206 17.234 59.368

3 1.05 14.999 74.367 1.05 14.999 74.367

4 0.911 13.008 87.375

5 0.362 5.178 92.553

6 0.318 4.541 97.094

7 0.203 2.906 100

Extraction Method: Principal Component Analysis.

a When components are correlated, sums of squared loadings cannot be added to obtain a total variance.

KMO and Bartlett's Test

Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin Measure of Sampling Adequacy. 0.66 Bartlett's Test of Sphericity Approx. Chi-Square 75.454

df 21

Sig. 0

Reliability Statistics

Cronbach's Alpha N of Items

(82)

82

Factor Analysis Health Risk Assesment

Total Variance Explained

Initial Eigenvalues

Extraction Sums of Squared Loadings

Component Total % of Variance

Cumulative

% Total

% of Variance

Cumulative %

1 2.352 78.408 78.408 2.352 78.408 78.408

2 0.359 11.982 90.389

3 0.288 9.611 100

Extraction Method: Principal Component Analysis.

KMO and Bartlett's Test

Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin Measure of Sampling Adequacy. 0.733 Bartlett's Test of

Sphericity Approx. Chi-Square 43.992

df 3

Sig. 0

Reliability Statistics

Cronbach's Alpha N of Items

(83)

83

Factor Analysis Attitude Towards Consuming the Food

Total Variance Explained

Initial Eigenvalues Extraction Sums of Squared Loadings Component Total % of Variance Cumulative % Total % of Variance Cumulative %

1 3.695 92.369 92.369 3,695 92.369 92.369

2 0.14 3.507 95.876

3 0.103 2.565 98.441

4 0.062 1.559 100

Extraction Method: Principal Component Analysis.

KMO and Bartlett's Test

Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin Measure of Sampling Adequacy. 0.87 Bartlett's Test of Sphericity Approx. Chi-Square 176.03

df 6

Sig. 0

Reliability Statistics

Cronbach's Alpha N of Items

Imagem

Table 1 – Validity and Reliability Group 1
Table 2 – Validity and Reliability Group 2
Table 3 Correlation Matrix Group 1 – Part 1
Table 3 Correlation Matrix Group 1 – Part 2
+4

Referências

Documentos relacionados

Objetivou-se, no presente trabalho, avaliar a metodologia de separação por cluster levando em consideração o desempenho de grupos de propriedades rurais em relação às BPAs no

A presente dissertação teve como objetivo estudar a relação entre a dor psicológica e um conjunto de variáveis demográficas (idade, género, escolaridade,

Ao nível das métricas de Social Network Analysis é possível realçar que cada métrica quantifica aspetos diferentes ao nível das interações, assim alguns resultados

de balanço de energia e massa para as fases gasosa e sólida foram simplificadas com as seguintes hipóteses simplifi- cadoras para obter um modelo simplificado para o secador

OBJETIVO: Avaliar o impacto do tempo de diagnóstico do Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 (DM2) sobre a qualidade de vida de idosos atendidos em Unidades Básicas de Saúde de Montes

No entanto, na tuna procura-se a promoção de saúde vocal, através de cuidados como aquecimento vocal antes de todos os ensaios e atuações, ensaios regulares da tuna e ensaios de

Tendo como referência a proposta de padrões de desempenho docente apresentada pelo Concelho Científico para a Avaliação de Professores (CCAP, 2010), tomou-se uma atitude