• Nenhum resultado encontrado

FOCUS GROUP DISCUSSION Version 2013 Haiti

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "FOCUS GROUP DISCUSSION Version 2013 Haiti"

Copied!
26
0
0

Texto

(1)

Focus Group

Discussion

(2)

Lecture Plan

3:30-4:00= lecture

4:00-4:30= students work in groups to

compile their question lines. We will

check each groups to make sure that

their questions are appropriate.

4:35 -5:15 students practice - 3 groups of

7 students

(3)

FGD: What is it ?

Group discussion with a purpose

With small number of homogenous

participants

Age range or life stage

Gender

Professional, social and ethnic

background

Uses instrument to primarily guide

the discussion

Requires a moderator and note

(4)

FGD: Uses

To explore people’s experience and opinions

To develop questions for questionnaires when little

is known about the topic

To assess context in view of developing a study

• recruitment issues, intervention channels, etc.

To complement quantitative data to understand

findings

To generate ideas about a new product, an

intervention, etc.

To solve programmatic/management problems,

explore range of solutions

Program evaluation: formative research –process

(5)

Recruitment

Define eligibility criteria

Based on study purpose

Recruitment strategy

Convenience sample

Participants volunteer to participate

Random

Could be used if there are a large pool of

volunteers who would like to participate

(6)

Size, Types and

Number

Size

• Key factor for deciding the group size is the FGD purpose • 7-9 participants is a good group size to manage

Types

• Homogeneity is usually best to enhance discussion • But also depends on discussion topic

• Usually, FG includes participants from same gender, age

range, professional status, ethnic background

How many?

• 3 FGDs with each specific participants

• Number of FGDs increases validity of information

(7)

The Moderator

Identify with the participants, knowledgeable

about the community, speak their language

Introduces, moderates and concludes the FGD

Guides the group discussion but does

participate in the discussion

• Does not provide opinion

• Does not educate participants

Insures that everybody has a chance to give

their opinion

Manage the group dynamic & potential

conflicts

Responsible for covering all the issues

included in the guide

Does require experience and practice!

http://old.solar-aid.org/project_lighting_malawian_homes/Chinyola%20microsolar %20group.png

(8)

The

Moderator’s

Competence

Familiarity with the topic

Outstanding communication skills

In-depth probing without leading

Continuous linking

Flexibility

Excellent moderation skills

Demonstrate flexibility

Engage participants

Consider all opinions

(9)

The Notetaker

Take written notes during

discussion

including group dynamic, group

reactions, frustrations, giggles, etc.

Does not participate in the

discussion

Should remain “invisible” to the group

Assist with logistic of incentives

Manage time

Meet with moderator for

debriefing

Transcripts recording or assists

with

https://encrypted-tbn1.gstatic.com/images? q=tbn:ANd9GcRJgpbtqJa2dl_STunfeTxGfn UXM1tBdeKAUwUHdEnZKTrF9KiY

(10)

The Transcriber

Transcribe tapes

verbatim including non

verbal (laughter, claps,

etc. )

Specific transcribing

protocol should be

provided

Should meet with note

taker and moderator to

discuss content

(11)

Focus Group Sitting

Tape recorder

Note taker

(12)

FGD: Considerations

Groups findings offer a range of views but

not their distribution in the population

FGD is not appropriate to explore individual

beliefs about issues that are considered as

sensitive or taboo

Group effect and dynamic on participants’

responses

Moderator’s influence on participants’

responses

Allocate enough time for transcribing data

(13)

FGD: Guide

List of topics areas from general to

specific topics of interest

List of probing questions to be used if

the information does not emerge

spontaneously

(14)

14

FGD Process : Three

Phases

1

. Introduction stage (10-15 minutes)

Moderator introduces himself/herself and Notetaker Explains consent and purpose of the FGD

Describes process

Time

Tape recorder

Goal to explore range of experience and not achieving consensus

Ground rules

Everyone should participate No right and wrong answers Turn off cell phones

Participants introduce themselves (may use a nickname)

Ice breaker activity

(15)

FGD Process: Three

Phases, cont

2

.

Interview/discussion (50-60 minutes)

Moderator starts with a grant tour question Moves to more specific questions

Note: Ask sensitive questions at the end, and only if you feel that participants will be confortable answering them

3. Closure stage ( 5-10 min)

Moderator identifies differences or summarizes what has been said

Invites participants to provide “last thoughts” Thanks participants

(16)

16

FGD: Example of an

Introduction

Good morning every body. My name is ______________ and I will be the moderator of this focus group discussion. This is my colleague _________________ who will be taking notes about our conversation.

I would like to thank you for being here today and before we start our discussion I would like to make sure that you have all read and

signed the consent form that was submitted to you. Do you have any questions?

This FG discussion is meant to explore the various range of

knowledge and experiences regarding …. so feel free to express your most sincere opinions as there is no right and wrong answers.

Since we are going to spend the next hour together discussing about … do you have any suggestions regarding discussion rules. ….

(17)

17

FGD: Example of

Closure

We have reached the end of this very interesting discussion. I would like to summarize some of the key differences and agreements. There were many different opinions about

________. In another hand, there were some agreement regarding ___________.

Does anyone want to add or clarify an opinion on this? Is there any other information that you would like me to provide?

Thank you very much for participating in this Focus Group discussion. Your time is very much appreciated and your comments very insightful.

(18)

Building the FGD Guide

About 8 to 12 questions

• Should be open-ended questions

What do you know about female condom?How would you …

• Include some leading probes/prompts

What about your female friends? Your boyfriend?

Process

• Guide developed based on the objectives of the research • Important to be familiar with issue so you can anticipate

the probes - unless is it a explorative topic

• Initial draft reviewed by expert in the field • Pretest it with small group of participants

(19)

Sequence of the FGD

questions

Grand tour question

Ask participants about their general opinions, feelings

about the issue of interest

What do you know about female condom?

Mini-tour questions

Explore specific issues

What are the differences between male and female condoms?

Probing questions

Ask for more

details or some examples

Leading probes are included in the guide

Any benefits in using female condoms?

Non leading probes to stimulate the participants to discuss further without moderator leading the response ( see next slides)

(20)

Tips when asking

questions

From impersonal to personal

Use open-ended questions

• How would you describe… • Where did you find …

• What do you think about…

Avoid yes/no question or use prompt for more

details

Avoid “why” question

Ask sensitive questions last

Use reflection, examples, illustration

Take participant back in the past but avoid asking

about the future

Use transitions when moving to a different

(21)

Probing for More

Probing is a way to get more info or to

better understand what someone has

said. A probe can be a question,

statement, or moment of silence

Reasons to probe

Learn more about underlying feelings,

meanings

Clarify a specific word

Get more information about a behavior or

process

(22)

Examples of Probing

Questions

Tell me more about that

Could you explains that?

Can you give me an example?

How do you feel about?

I am not sure I understand, can

you..?

What other people said about?

Explain why, why or why not?

(23)

Other Ways to Probe

Remain silence

Restate what the participant has just said

Repeat the participant’s word as a question

It’s good?

Gently confront the participants to clarify a

position

I’m a little confuse. Earlier I though you said… but

now, I’m hearing…

Use key words probes in responses to

participant’s statements

It’s good. What it’s good?

Use the third person technique

(24)

Encouraging

Participants to

interact

Restate rule about having them

speaking openly

“no right and wrong answers”

Refer questions to the entire group

Use body language to give someone

the permission to speak

Other tips

Silence

Incomplete statement

Sophisticated naivete

(25)

Let’s Practice

 You are the director of a program. You are asked to implement a

HPV vaccination campaign among children. In the context of your formative evaluation, you want to conduct some FGDs to explore parents’ knowledge, attitude about HPV infection and HPV

vaccination.

 Develop 10 - 12 questions and for each question you will include 2

probes

 One or two student will role-play the moderator

• Introduce the FGD

Conduct the interview

Conclude the interview

 Two students will take note  The other will be the parents

Once you have completed the FGD, discuss with the process of the FGD, what was easy, less easy- what were the challenges to conduct a FGC .

(26)

Sources

 Lecompte, M. D. and Goets, J. P. (1982) ‘Problems of Reliability and Validity

in EthnographicResearch’, Review of Educational Research, 53: 31-6

 Guba, E. G. and Lincoln, Y. S. (1994), ‘Competing Paradigms in Qualitative

Research’ in N. K.Denzin and Y. S. Lincoln (eds.) Handbook of Qualitative

Research, Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage

  

 Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA:

Sage]

  

 Creswell, J. W. & Miller, D. L. (2000). Determining validity in qualitative

inquiry. Theory into Practice, 39(3), 124-131

 Russel Bernard (2000). Focus Groups, in: Social Research Methods.

Qualitative and quantitative approaches. P.207-211

 Spradley, James P. 1979. The Ethnographic Interview. New York

 Shank, G.D. (2006). Qualitative research: A personal skills approach (2nd

ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.

 FGD”

http://www.fhi360.org/NR/rdonlyres/exojqw6qwz2dfbxk2rdix3dmwzr5i4eviuqzhlu2qk25eabfd6tyttmnmqmo6epkn7m

Referências

Documentos relacionados

Banco de questões Numa segunda experiência, mantém-se o bloco em repouso aplicando uma força , F paralela ao plano inclinado, cujo sentido está indicado na figura II..

No entanto, Salata argumenta que os critérios de Neri (somente a renda), assim como de outros autores (categorias ocupacionais e/ou capitais culturais), não são suficientes para

Muito embora os Charde sejam os católicos com mais estatuto na aldeia e, especialmente, os bhatkar, quando comparados com os de outras aldeias vizinhas, é possível

Falo também para todos aqueles que não tendo votado Aliança Democrática no dia 5 de Outubro querem em Portugal uma democracia plena, sem Conselho da Revolução, sem os comunistas

Darlinda Moreira, Diversity in European school populations: A study in Portugal and Greece with particular attention to Romany

When traversing the trails with pemphigus in this cartography, we considered that subjec- tion and individualization practices are inscribed on these patients, in a profile

Thus, debates and enriching reflections on the theme were promoted, clarifying, at the end of the culture circles, the themes elaborated by the different social actors present,

For example, studies in the field of behavioral corporate finance emphasize the cognitive processes and biases of the individual decision maker, but pay little attention to how