• Nenhum resultado encontrado

Rev. Bras. Reumatol. vol.52 número6 en v52n6a01

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2018

Share "Rev. Bras. Reumatol. vol.52 número6 en v52n6a01"

Copied!
2
0
0

Texto

(1)

EDITORIAL

817

Rev Bras Reumatol 2012;52(6):817-818

I

n adults with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), an-tinucleosome antibodies have already been described as markers of disease activity and lupus nephritis.1–4 In

addition, anti-C1q and antinucleosome antibodies have an amplifying effect on the etiopathogenesis of lupus nephritis in adults.5 In this issue of the Brazilian Journal of Rheumaotlogy,

Jesus et al.6 have clearly shown the association of those

an-tibodies with lupus nephritis, indicating that they could be a potential biomarker of renal lesion in juvenile SLE. In a previous study, that same group of researchers had already demonstrated the association of antinucleosome antibodies with disease activity, but not with lupus nephritis.7 One of

the major concerns of rheumatologists is to identify a test that can be used in the follow-up of patients with SLE, both

Antinucleosome and anti-C1q antibodies

in juvenile systemic lupus erythematosus

© 2012 Elsevier Editora Ltda. All rights reserved.

adult and juvenile, especially for establishing disease activity and its correct diagnosis. Thus, the study by Jesus et al.6 has

shown that anti-C1q and antinucleosome antibodies have high specifi city and elevated positive predictive value (over 97%) to diagnose lupus, being considered reliable instruments for clinical practice. Finally, those authors have also suggested that anti-C1q and antinucleosome antibodies should be measured in the investigation of lupus, especially in patients with juvenile SLE, who test negative for anti-dsDNA antibodies.

Paulo Louzada-Junior Max Victor Carioca Freitas

(2)

EDITORIAL

818 Rev Bras Reumatol 2012;52(6):817-818

REFERENCES

REFERÊNCIAS

1. Kiss E, Lakos G, Szegedi G, Poor G, Szodoray P. Anti-nucleossomo antibody, a reliable indicator for lupus nephritis. Autoimmunity 2009; 42(5):393–8.

2. Muller S, Dieker J, Tincani A, Meroni PL. Pathogenic anti-nucleossomo antibodies. Lupus 2008; 17(5):431–6.

3. Gómez-Puerta JA, Burlingame RW, Cervera R. Anticromatina (anti-nucleossomo) antibodies: diagnostic and clinical value. Autoimmun Rev 2008; 7(8):606–11.

4. Souza A, da Silva LM, Oliveira FR, Roselino AM, Louzada-Junior P. Anti-nucleossomo and anticromatina antibodies are present in active systemic lupus erythematosus but not in the cutaneous form of the disease. Lupus 2009; 18(3):223–9.

5. O’Flynn J, Flierman R, van der Pol P, Rops A, Satchell SC, Mathieson PW

et al. Nucleossomos and C1q bound to glomerular endothelial cells serve as targets for autoantibodies and determine complement activation. Mol Immunol 2011; 49(1-2):75–83.

6. Jesus AA, Campos LMA, Liphaus BL, Carneiro-Sampaio M, Mangueira CLP, Rosseto EA et al. Anti-C1q, anti-chromatin/ nucleosome, and anti-dsDNA antibodies in juvenile systemic lupus erythematosus patients. Rev Bras Reumatol 2012; 52(6):971–81. 7. Jesus AA, Silva CA, Carneiro-Sampaio M, Sheinberg M, Mangueira CL,

Referências

Documentos relacionados

Patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) can have alterations in bone metabolism and skeletal growth, as well as damage to the temporomandibular joint (TMJ), which

Although raloxifene has shown no effect on the reduction of hip and other non-vertebral fractures, its use has proved to be cost-effective when compared to no drug treatment in

ASEX: Arizona Sexual Experience Scale; BDI: Beck Depression Inventory; DQoLS: Dermatology Quality of Life Scale; DLQI: Dermatology Life Quality Index; SQoL-M: Sexual Quality of

On the other hand, if considered a unique disease, is this phenomenon a random event or does it represent a distinct subgroup of patients, with peculiar clinical, pathogenic,

In clinical practice, a patient with lupus, signi fi cant pho- tosensitivity and blistering lesions should always be assessed for porphyrias, because of the therapeutic implication

The article “Psychiatric comorbidities in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: a systematic review of the last 10 years” (Rev Bras Reumatol 2013;53(5):431-437) was

Objective: To determine the frequency of antiparvovírus B19 (B19) antibodies in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), and the possible

Dysplastic changes in all hematopoietic lineages and peripheral cytopenias have also been described in SLE patients; however, they seem to be reversible with remission of