w w w . s b f g n o s i a . o r g . b r / r e v i s t a
Original
Article
Activity
of
Fabaceae
species
extracts
against
fungi
and
Leishmania:
vatacarpan
as
a
novel
potent
anti-Candida
agent
Dandara
Braga
Santana
a,
Raphaella
Correia
da
Costa
a,
Renata
Mendonc¸
a
Araújo
b,
José
Elias
de
Paula
a,1,
Edilberto
Rocha
Silveira
c,
Raimundo
Braz-Filho
d,e,
Laila
Salmen
Espindola
a,∗aLaboratóriodeFarmacognosia,FaculdadedeCiênciasdaSaúde,UniversidadedeBrasília,CampusUniversitárioDarcyRibeiro,Brasília,DF,Brazil
bInstitutodeQuímica,UniversidadeFederaldoRioGrandedoNorte,Natal,RN,Brazil
cDepartamentodeQuímicaOrgânica,UniversidadeFederaldoCeará,Fortaleza,CE,Brazil
dLaboratóriodeCiênciasQuímicas,UniversidadeEstadualdoNorteFluminense,CamposdosGoytacazes,RJ,Brazil
eDepartamentodeQuímica,UniversidadeFederalRuraldoRiodeJaneiro,Seropédica,RJ,Brazil
a
r
t
i
c
l
e
i
n
f
o
Articlehistory:
Received28May2015 Accepted28July2015 Availableonline15August2015
Keywords:
Enterolobiumellipticum
Sclerolobiumaureum
Vataireamacrocarpa
Vatacarpan
Leishmania
Fungi
a
b
s
t
r
a
c
t
Leishmaniasisandfungalinfectiontreatmentefficacyislimitedbytoxicityandeverincreasing resis-tancetoavailabledrugs,requiringdevelopmentofalternativecompounds.TherichnessofCerradoplant antimicrobialsecondarymetabolitesjustifiesscreeningofFabaceaespeciesextracts:Enterolobium ellip-ticumBenth.,Sclerolobiumaureum(Tul.)Baill.andVataireamacrocarpa(Benth.)Ducke,againstLeishmania (Leishmania)amazonensis,yeastsanddermatophytes.Amongthe26extractstested,morethan50%ofthe totaldemonstratedsignificantantifungalactivityincomparisontothedrugcontrols(minimalinhibitory concentration0.12to≤31.25g/ml).Sixextractscapableofcompleteparasiticgrowthinhibitionhadthe
inhibitoryconcentrationindexfor50%valuesfrom9.23to78.65g/ml.Theresultsledtotheselection oftheV.macrocarpaethylacetaterootbarkextractforchemicalfractionation.Thisplant, tradition-allyreferredtoasangelim-do-cerradoormaleiteira,isusedtotreatsuperficialmycosesinAmazonia.A previouslyunreportedpterocarpanvatacarpantogetherwiththeknowncompoundmusizinwas iso-lated.Vatacarpandemonstratedaminimalinhibitoryconcentrationvalueof0.98g/mlagainstCandida albicansATCC10231,andthuscomparableorsuperiortofluconazoleandamphotericinB.Theresults addtoliterature’sinformationtheabilityofpterocarpanstoactasantimicrobialagents.
©2015SociedadeBrasileiradeFarmacognosia.PublishedbyElsevierEditoraLtda.Allrightsreserved.
Introduction
Natural products and their ethnopharmacological activities havebeenhistoricallyusedasaprimarysourceofcompoundsfor drugdiscovery.However,forthelasttwentyyears,thetechnical requirementsforhighthroughputscreeningledthe pharmaceuti-calindustrytofocusoncombinatorialchemistrylibrariesinstead. Thispathwaywasonlypartlysuccessfulsinceitcameupwith struc-turesthatlackedthecomplexscaffoldofsecondarymetabolites. Currently,naturalproductsareagainasourceofdrugdiscovery, providingleadcompoundsforclinicaltrials,including antimicro-bialagents(Diasetal.,2012;Harveyetal.,2015).
Theincidenceoffungalinfections hassignificantlyincreased sincethelate1960s,primarilywithcasesofimmune-compromised orhospitalizedpatients.Researchdedicatedtothedevelopment
∗ Correspondingauthor.
E-mail:darvenne@unb.br(L.S.Espindola).
1Inmemoriam.
of new therapeutic strategies has culminated in four antifun-gal classes currently used in clinicalpractice: fluoropyrimidine analogs, polyenes(suchasamphotericinB, themostcommonly usedmedicationfor systemicinfections)azolesand equinocan-dines(Vandeputteetal.,2012).
Cutaneous leishmaniasis is considered a neglected tropical diseases group,with 1.5million peopleworldwide manifesting skinlesionswhichpersistforseveralmonths,orevenyears(Silva etal.,2013).Pentavalentantimonials(Sb+5)remaintheprimary
treatmentoption,despitetheirtoxicityandlowpatienttolerance, witheitherpentamidineoramphotericin Bused assecondline treatments.
The failure of the aforementioned drug strategies has been attributed to microbial resistance. The use of plants by tradi-tional local communities and the richness of Cerrado species antimicrobialsecondarymetaboliteshavebeenreported(DeAssis etal., 2014;Albernazetal., 2012;MeloeSilvaetal., 2009;De Mesquitaet al.,2005).We screenedFabaceaeextractsfromthe Cerrado:EnterolobiumellipticumBenth.,Sclerolobiumaureum(Tul.) Baill.andVataireamacrocarpa(Benth.)Ducke,againstLeishmania
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjp.2015.07.012
(Leishmania) amazonensis, yeasts and dermatophytes. These antimicrobialresultsledtotheselectionofV.macrocarparootbark ethylacetateextractforfurtherchemicalstudies.Here,wepresent theisolation,structureelucidationandantimicrobialactivityofone pterocarpan.Thisnewnaturalproductwasmoreactivethanthe antifungalreferencefluconazoleandamphotericinB.
Materialsandmethods
Plantextracts
Plant species Enterolobium ellipticum Benth., Sclerolobium aureum (Tul.) Baill. and Vatairea macrocarpa (Benth.) Ducke, Fabaceae,werecollectedin2010fromtheCerradobiomeinthe LagoaFormosaarea,Planaltina,FederalDistrictofBrazil,south lat-itude15◦27′34.2′′; south longitude47◦92′3.3′′; atan altitudeof 1071m, and subsequently identifiedbybotanist Prof.JoséElias dePaula.VouchernumberswerekeptintheUniversityofBrasilia (UB/UnB)Herbarium(Table1).Plantorganswereseparated,dried, stabilized,pulverizedandextractedbymacerationwithhexane, ethylacetateandethanol.Theextractivesolutionswere concen-tratedin a rotary evaporator, yielding different crude extracts, whichwerestoredat−20◦C.
Antifungalactivitymethod
Theminimalinhibitoryconcentration(MIC)ofeachextractwas determinedforyeasts:CandidaalbicansATCC10231,C.parapsilosis
ATCC 22019 and C. glabrataLMGO 44, using CLSIM27-A3 and M27-S4 protocols(CLSI, 2008a, 2012); and for dermatophytes:
TrichophytonmentagrophytesLMGO 09and Trichophytonrubrum
LMGO 06, following the CLSI M38-A2 protocol (CLSI, 2008b); withminormodificationsaspreviouslydescribedbytheresearch group(DaCosta etal., 2014)(see Supportinginformation).The LMGO (Laboratório de Micologia de Goiás) strains are clinical isolatesfrompatientsattheFederalUniversityofGoiásHospital, Brazil.Itraconazole(Sigma),flucytosine(Sigma)andamphotericin B (Sigma) were used as reference compounds for yeasts and dermatophytes.Afourthpositivecontrolfluconazole(Sigma)was usedforyeastsonly.
Invitroantileishmanialactivity
The extracts were tested against Leishmania (Leishmania)
amazonensis(L(L)a)(MHOM/BR/PH8)promastigotesmaintainedin Schneiderculturemedium(Sigma)with20%heat-inactivatedfetal calfserum,at22–25◦C.ExtractsweredissolvedinDMSO(Sigma) anddilutedinSchneider’smedium(Sigma).Theinhibitory concen-trationindexfor50%(IC50)ofthepromastigoteswasdetermined
bytheMTTmethod.Experimentswereperformedaspreviously described(DaCostaetal.,2014)(seeSupportinginformation)with amphotericinB(Sigma)usedasthereferencedrug.
Generalexperimentalprocedures
Column chromatography was performed using silica gel 60 (230–400mesh, Merck).ThinLayer Chromatography(TLC) was
Table1
Fabaceaespeciesextractactivity–determinationoftheminimuminhibitoryconcentration(MIC–g/ml)againstyeastsanddermatophytes,andIC50(g/ml)against
Leishmania(Leishmania)amazonensis.
Fabaceaefamily species Vouchernumber
Extract Plantpart (solvent)/%yield
MIC(g/ml) IC50(g/ml)
L.(L.)amazonensis
C.albicans ATCC10223
C.parapsilosis ATCC22019
C.glabrata LMGO44
T.mentagrophytes LMGO09
T.rubrum LMGO06
Enterolobiumellipticum Benth
(UB)3739
RW(h)/0.37 250 250 125 500 250 >100 RW(ea)/0.56 1.95 3.91 >1000 500 62.5 >100 RW(e)/9.05 >1000 >1000 >1000 >1000 1000 70.05 RB(ea)/1.44 500 125 >1000 500 500 >100 SW(h)/0.32 >1000 1000 500 1000 500 78.65 SW(ea)/0.61 0.98 31.25 >1000 250 250 >100 SB(h)/0.55 1000 500 250 500 1000 25.87 SB(ea)/2.18 >1000 15.62 >1000 125 500 9.23 L(ea)/5.64 125 15.62 >1000 250 >1000 >100
Sclerolobiumaureum (Tul.)Baill. (UB)3818
RW(h)/0.42 >1000 >1000 >1000 1000 250 >100 RW(ea)/0.62 0.48 0.12 31.25 31.25 31.25 >100 RW(e)/6.06 1.95 3.91 15.62 31.25 31.25 >100 RB(ea)/1.98 7.81 7.81 15.62 15.62 31.25 >100 SW(h)/0.25 1000 500 500 500 31.25 >100 SW(ea)/0.66 0.48 15.62 15.62 15.62 31.25 >100 SW(e)/3.47 0.12 0.12 0.12 15.62 31.25 >100 SB(ea)/2.05 7.81 15.62 7.81 15.62 31.25 >100 L(ea)/4.74 250 7.81 1000 >1000 >1000 >100
Vataireamacrocarpa (Benth.)Ducke (UB)3815
RW(h)/0.48 0.98 1.95 500 62.5 500 72.39 RW(ea)/0.90 3.91 3.91 250 125 500 >100 RB(ea)/9.78 0.98 0.98 31.25 62.5 125 71.47 SW(h)/0.43 250 250 >1000 1000 125 >100 SW(ea)/0.78 1.95 1.95 500 62.5 125 >100 SW(e)/4.25 0.24 1.95 500 31.25 62.5 >100 SB(ea)/4.84 1.95 1.95 250 31.25 31.25 >100 L(ea)/8.58 1.95 1.95 250 62.5 62.5 >100 Itraconazole 0.125 0.0625 0.125 0.25 0.125 –
Flucytosine 0.25 0.0635 0.125 – –
Fluconazole 1 0.5 4 4 2 –
AmphotericinB 4 4 16 4 – 0.067
performedonprecoatedsilicagelaluminumplates(TLCSilicagel 60 F254, Merck).The compounds werevisualizedby UV
detec-tionand/orsprayedwithasolutionofvanillin/sulphuricacid/EtOH. OpticalrotationwasmeasuredonaPerkinElmer341polarimeter. TheIRspectra(KBRpellets)wererecordedusingaPerkin-Elmer FT-IR1000spectrometer.Thehighresolutionelectrospray ioniza-tionmassspectra(HRESIMS)wereacquiredusingaLCMS-IT-TOF (225-07100-34)Shimadzuspectrometer.Themassspectrawere recordedonaShimadzuQP5000/DI-50spectrometer,operating withelectron impactat 70eV. The1D and 2D NMR datawere acquiredonaBrukerAvanceDPX-300spectrometer,equippedwith a5mmmultinuclearinverseprobe,usinggradientfieldintheZ directionandamagnitudeof10A.Chemicalshifts,givenonthe ıscale,werereferencedtotheresidualundeuteratedportionof theCDCl3,deuteratedsolvent.Allstandardpulsesequenceswere
providedbytheBrukerTOP-SPINsoftware.Allexperimentswere conductedatroomtemperature.
Extractionandisolation
A 115.70g portion of V. macrocarpa root bark was dried, powderedandsubsequentlymaceratedinethylacetateatroom temperature,yielding11.83gofextractaftersolventevaporation underreducedpressure.An8.28gportionoftheEtOAcextractwas fractionatedwithhexane,EtOAcandMeOHasthebinarymixture ofincreasingpolarityandyielded65fractionswhichwereanalyzed byTLC.
Flashchromatographyoffractions 19–22(749.9mg),by elu-tionwithhexane,ethylacetateandMeOHasabinarymixtureof increasingpolarityyielded316fractionsanalyzedbyTLC.
Fraction3(50–61)(5.10mg)correspondedtomusizin(2). Fraction 9 (176–179) (27.5mg) and fraction 10 (180–183) (40.3mg)wereregroupedfollowingTLCanalysis.Anewflash chro-matographywasconductedwhichyielded141fractionsanalyzed byTLC.Fraction3(16–21)(4.60mg)wasfoundtobeapreviously unreportedpterocarpan–namedhereinasvatacarpan(1).
Vatacarpan(1).Whitesolid;m.p.135.2–136.4◦C;[␣]
D=+63◦ (c.0.1,MeOH);1Hand13CNMR(CDCl
3,300MHz)seeTable2;
HR-ESI-TOFMS(1)m/z423.2166[M+H]+(calcdforC
26H30O5).
Musizin(2).Browncrystals,1H(CDCl3,300MHz):6.99(s,H-4),
7.08(d,7.8,H-5),7.48(t,7.8,H-6),6.84(d,7.8,H-7),2.76(s,H-12), 2.66(s,H-13),17.35(s,OH-1),10.24(s,OH-8)and13CNMR:205.2
(C-11),168.8(C-1),158.8(C-8),138.4(C-10),133.0(C-6),132.4 (C-3),122.1(C-4),117.7(C-5),113.8(C-2),113.2(C-9),111.4(C-7), 32.4(C-12),25.5(C-13).
2'
2'' 3'
3''
4'' 4'
5'
5''
1'
4 4a
1a 11a
10a 8 7
7 6
5 4
10 3
9
8 1
11 2 12
13
6
7a 6a 3
2
1
1''
HO
H
3CO
OH
OH
O
O
O
2
10 9
OH
1
Resultsanddiscussion
Atotalof26extractswerepreparedfromtheFabaceae fam-ily:ninefromE.ellipticum,ninefromS.aureum,andeightfrom
V.macrocarpa.Ofalltheextracts,85%presentedactivityagainst aminimumofonefungalstrainusingtheactiveextractcriterion (MIC≤125g/ml)specifiedbyAlbernazetal.(2010).Inaddition,
Table2
1H(300MHz)and13C(75MHz)NMRdataassignmentsforvatacarpan(CDCl 3).
Carbon number
HSQC HMBC
ıC ıH 2JCH 3JCH
1 114.3 6.95(s) H-11a 1a 123.2 –
2 143.7 –
3 146.6 – H-1/MeO-3
4 116.0 –
4a 147.3 – H-1/H-11a
6 70.6 4.02(d,10.0) 3.64(d,10.0)
H-11a
6a 46.7 – 7 124.4 7.01(d,7.9)
7a 123.9 – H-8/H-10
8 107.7 6.36(dd,7.9,2.2) H-10/H-7a
9 156.8 – H-7
10 98.6 6.34(d,2.2)
10a 160.9 – H-7
11a 83.1 5.10(s) H-1 1′ 26.7 3.34(d,6.5)
2′ 122.8 5.14(t,6.5) 3H-4′/3H-5′ 3′ 131.0 – 3H-4′/3H-5′
4′ 18.1 1.76(s) 3H-5′ 5′ 25.9 1.66(s) 3H-4′ 1′′ 31.2 2.45(d,7.5) H-6 2′′ 118.9 5.23(t,7.8) 3H-4′′/3H-5′′ 3′′ 135.6 – 3H-4′′/3H-5′′
4′′ 18.2 1.54(s) 3H-5′′ 5′′ 26.2 1.70(s) 3H-4′′ MeO-5 61.7 3.79(s)
morethan50%ofthetotalsamplesdemonstratedsignificant activ-ityincomparisontothedrugcontrols(MIC0.12to≤31.25g/ml) (Table1).Theinhibitoryconcentrationindexfor50%ofthe pro-mastigotesfromL.(L.)amazonensis(IC50determinedbytheMTT
method)wascalculatedforthesixextractscapableofcomplete parasiticgrowthinhibitionataconcentrationof100g/ml:four extractsfromE.ellipticumandtwofromV.macrocarpa(IC509.23to
78.65g/ml);withnoactivityobservedforS.aureum(Table1). InspiredbytheclinicaluseofamphotericinBinthetreatmentof fungalinfectionsandleishmaniasis,weselectedtheV.macrocarpa
rootbarkEtOAcextractforchemicalstudiesbasedonitsactivity, yield,quantityandpolarity.Silica-gelopencolumn chromatogra-phyofthis8.28gextract(fungalMIC0.98–125g/mlandparasite IC5071.47g/ml)yielded65fractions.
Fractionationrevealedanunreportedcompoundnamedherein asvatacarpan(1),togetherwithmusizin(2)(Covelletal.,1961).All compoundstructureswereestablishedusingspectroscopic tech-niques,including1Dand2DNMRanalysis,andcomparisonwith previouslyreporteddata.
Compound 1, was a white solid (m.p. 135.2–136.4◦C). The infrared (IR) spectrum showedabsorption bands at 3384cm−1 characteristicofhydroxylgroupsandat1620and1570cm−1ofthe skeletalvibrationsofthebenzenering.Asymmetricandsymmetric C O Cstretchingofaryl-alkyletherat1261–1199and1085cm−1, respectively,werealsoobservedinadditiontophenolabsorptions at1380and1165cm−1.TheHRESIMSof1displayedamolecular ionpeakatm/z423.2166correspondingtothemolecularformula C26H30O5.
Inthe1HNMRspectrum(300MHz,CDCl
3),amethoxygroupat
ıH3.79(s)andanaromaticprotonatıH7.26(H1,s)wereobserved,
consistentwithapentasubstitutedbenzenemoietyandthree aro-maticprotonscompatiblewiththepresenceofanABXspinsystem atıH6.34(H10,d,2.2),6.36(H8,dd,7.9,2.2)and7.01(H7,d,7.9).
5.14(H2′,t,J=6.5Hz)and5.23(H2′′,t,J=7.5Hz),inadditiontothe twomethyleneprotonsatıH3.34(H1′,d,J=6.5)and2.45(H1′′,d, J=7.5).ThecorrelationofthesesignalsintheCOSYspectrum con-firmedthetwoprenylmoieties.Inaddition,the1HNMRspectrum
revealedsignalsforadiastereotopicmethyleneatıH4.02(H6␣,d, 10.0)and3.64(H6,d,J=10.0Hz)andanoxymethineprotonatıH
5.10(H11a,s)typicaloftheoxymethyleneandoxymethineprotons
oftheheterocyclicringB(2H-6)andC(H-11a)ofa6a-substituted pterocarpanskeleton,respectively.Thepterocarpanskeletonwas supportedbythecorrelationdisplayedbetweenH-6andH-11ain theNOESYspectrum.
The13CandDEPT135◦NMRspectroscopicdataof1(Table2) revealed26carbonatoms,correspondingto:fourmethyls(␦C18.1,
18.2,25.9and26.2);amethoxyl(␦C61.7);threemethylenes(␦C
70.6,31.2and 26.7);one oxymethine(␦C 83.1); one
nonhydro-genated(␦C46.7);fourolefiniccarbons(ıC118.9,122.8,131.0and
135.6);fourhydrogenatedaromaticcarbons(␦C98.6,107.7,114.3
and124.4);andeightquaternaryaromaticcarbons(␦C116.0,123.2,
123.9,143.7,146.6,147.3,156.8and160.9).The1H,13C-HSQC
spec-trumexhibitedcorrelationbetweenthehydrogensat␦H4.02(H6␣,
d,10.0),3.64(H6,d,10.0Hz)and5.10(H11a,s)withthe
oxycar-bonsat␦C70.6(C-6)and83.1(C-11a),respectively.TheseNMR
signalstogetherwiththemethinecarbonat␦C46.7(C-6a),ratified
thepresenceofa6a-substitutedpterocarpanskeleton. Thedeshieldingofthemethylenehydrogens2H-1′ (␦
H 3.34)
when compared with the 2H-1′′ (␦
H 2.45), was associated to
anisotropiceffectofthearomaticringa-locatedattheC-1′carbon. Inaddition,theHMBCcorrelationofthe2H-1′(␦
H3.34)withthe
carbonsat␦C116.0(C-4),and147.3(C-4a)establishedtheposition
theoneprenylfragmentatC-4inthearomaticringA.OtherHMBC correlationofthemethoxylprotons(s,3.79)withthesignalat␦C
146.6(C-3),andconcomitantcorrelationoftheH-1(s,6.95)with thesignalsat␦C123.2(C-1a),146.6(C-3),and83.1(C-11a),
indi-catedthepositionofthemethoxylandhydroxylgroups,atC-3and C-2,respectively,confirmedthesubstitutionpatterninaromatic ringA.ThelocationofthehydroxylgroupattheC-9carbonofthe trisubstitutedaromaticringDwasbasedonHMBCcorrelationof thehydrogenat␦H7.01(H-7)tothecarbonsat␦C156.8(C-10a)
and160.9(C-9)andconcomitantcorrelationofthehydrogensat ␦H6.36(H-8)and6.34(H-10)withthecarbonat␦C123.9(C-7a),
inaccordancewithbiogeneticbackgrounds(Dewick,2002). TherelativestereochemistryoftheBandDpterocarpanrings wasdeterminedbytheNOESYexperiment,whichrevealeddipolar interactionsofthemethylene2H-1′′withthehydrogensH-6and H-11a.Inaddition,thepositiveopticalrotationvalue[␣]D=+63◦
(c.0.1,MeOH)wasdecisivefortheassignmentoftheabsolute ste-reochemistryofthestereogeniccentersC-6aandC-11aasS(Araújo etal.,2008).Thus,compound1wasidentifiedas(+)-6aS,11aS -2,9-dihydroxy-3-methoxy-4,6a-diprenyl-pterocarpanonthebasis of theNMR(1Dand2D,Table2)spectraldataandHRESIMS(positive mode).
Pterocarpans,thesecondlargestgroupofnaturalisoflavonoids, receivedthis name fromPterocarpusspecies,thefirst sourceof thisclassofcompounds.Sincethen,manystructurallydiverse pte-rocarpanshavebeenisolatedand somedemonstrateinteresting biological activities(Goel et al.,2013). Pterocarpanshave been mainlyfoundinalargenumberofFabaceaespecies,andhavebeen reportedtoexhibitantifungal(Jiménez-Gonzálezetal.,2008)and antiprotozoal(Vieiraetal.,2008)activities.
Compound2wasobtainedasbrowncrystals.TheIRspectrum showedabsorptionbandsofO Hstretchingat3297cm−1and car-bonylconjugatedC Ostretchingat1628cm−1.Phenolabsorptions werealso observedat 1378–1317cm−1 and 1280–1160 associ-atedtoC Ostretching,andat1580and1440cm−1oftheskeletal vibrationsof the aromaticring. The NMR spectra (see Suppor-tinginformation)showedthepresenceoftwomethylgroups,an
chelatogenichydroxylgroup,acarbonylgroup,andanaphthalene ring.Followinganalysisbyspectroscopicmeansandcomparison withthedatafromtheliterature,compound2wasidentifiedas musizin(Covellet al.,1961)otherwise named dianellidin (Dias etal.,2009)andnepodin(LiandMcLaughlin,1989).
TheliteraturedescribestheactivityofmusizinagainstC.albicans
ATCC14053andTrichophytonmentagrophytesATCC28185(Dias et al., 2009), and as a potent antiprotozoal compound against malariaparasites(LeeandRhee,2013).
Vatacarpan(1)wasactiveagainstC.albicansATCC10231with a MIC value (MIC 0.98g/ml) comparable to fluconazole (MIC 1.00g/ml)andsuperiortoamphotericinB(MIC4.00g/ml).
The literature reports the production of pterocarpans as a responseto bioticand abioticfactors,suchasfungal andother pathogenchallenges(Jiménez-Gonzálezetal.,2008; Goeletal., 2013).Pterocarpansaccumulateininfectedtissue,thesiteof anti-fungalactivity.Forsomeofthemhighconcentrationsarereached rapidly,then slowlydecrease as the infectionceases ( Jiménez-Gonzálezet al., 2008).Several studies have tried torelate the structureofthepterocarpansystemwiththeirfungicidalactivity.
Investigations have shown that the roots of some plants whichcontainpterocarpanshaveastrongactivitytowardhuman pathogens(Jiménez-Gonzálezetal.,2008).It iswellestablished thatlipophilicpterocarpanspossessincreasedantifungalactivity, sincetheycrossfungalmembranesmoreeasily(Harborne,1978). TherootbarkisthesourceoftheV.macrocarpaextractstudied.This organiscontinuouslychallengedtosoilmicroorganisms,humidity andoxidativestress,conditionsthatmayenhancetheproduction ofpterocarpans.
BiologicalactivityscreeningofV.macrocarpaextracts demon-strated themostpositive resultsin terms of activityspectrum. Thetwoextractsactiveagainsttheprotozoawerefromtheroot (Table1).AlloftheV.macrocarpaextractswereactiveagainstat leastonefungalstrain(MIC≤125g/ml)(Table1),withthe
major-ityofMICvaluesforC.parapsilosisATCC22019comparableto,or betterthan,thedrugcontrols.C.parapsilosisisregardedas refer-enceyeast(CLSI,2008a,b,2012).Adecade-spanningmulti-centric studyinBrazilianhospitalsrevealedanincreaseintheincidenceof
Candidanon-albicanspathogens,primarilyC.parapsilosis(Colombo etal.,2006).Anotherstudyin29Spanishhospitalsreported can-didemiain ICU patientscaused by non-albicans species in 48% ofcases,withC.parapsilosisasthemostcommonspecies( Puig-Asensio etal., 2014).In dermatophytes, theMICvalues ranged from31.25to125g/ml(Table1).Literaturereportsthetraditional useofV. macrocarparootand stembarkinsuperficialmycoses treatmentinAmazonia (Piedade andFilho, 1988).In this work, theethylacetateextractsfromthesameplantorganswereactive againstclinicalisolatesofTrichophytonmentagrophytesLMGO09 andT.rubrumLMGO06(MIC31.25to≤125g/ml)–the
dermato-phytesresponsibleforthemajorityofsuperficialfungalinfections intheAmericas(Grannoumetal.,2013;Havlickovaetal.,2008).
V.macrocarparemainsawidelyusedtreatmentofdiabetes melli-tussymptoms(Bavilonietal.,2010;Oliveiraetal.,2008),orasan antiulcerandanti-inflammatory(Jesusetal.,2009)–suggesting thatitisanon-toxicspecies,asshowninexperimentalanimalsfor heartwoodmethanolextract(Jesusetal.,2012).
V.macrocarpaandV.guianensisareoftendescribedinthe lit-erature as sources of lectins, a very diverse class of proteins. Lectinsfoundintheseedsofthesespecies,amongotherFabaceae, showvariousbiologicalactivities,suchasalternativeantimicrobial agents(Vasconcelosetal.,2014),ashistologicalmarkers,orastools forcancerresearch(Sousaetal.,2015).
ethylacetateextractdemonstratedthemostleishmanicidal activ-ity(IC50 9.23g/ml) (Table 1).Thisspecies islocally knownas
“brincos-de-saguim”becauseitsfruitresembles“monkey’sears” anditisusedbytraditionalcommunitiestotreatpulmonary infec-tions(Corrêa,1984).Otherspeciesofthesamegenusareusedin Braziltotreatparasitismandgonorrhea(Mimakietal.,2004).
S.aureumextractswereinactiveagainstL.(L.)amazonensis,but exhibitedhighactivityin71%ofthetestsconductedagainstATCC strainsandclinicalisolatesofpathogenicfungi.C.glabrataLMGO 44 results(MIC0.12to 31.25g/ml)(Table1)are thereforean importantconsiderationinthesearchforleadercompoundsgiven theincreasedclinicalincidenceofthisspecies(Puig-Asensioetal., 2014).ItisimportanttonotethatS.aureumisusedbytheCerrado communitiesforthetreatmentoffungalinfectionsandasa hep-atoprotector–suggestingthatitisanon-toxicspecies.Quilombola andsomeindigenousBrazilianpeopleuseadecoctionofthestem barkasacontraceptive(Rodrigues,2007).TheMumbuca commu-nityuseaS.aureuminfusionasahepatoprotectorinTocantinsState, Brazil(Coelhoetal.,2005).AnotherSclerolobiumspeciesisusedin thetreatmentofskindiseases(Mu˜nozetal.,2000).
PreviousresultsfromtheCerradoplantextractlibrary,builtby ourresearchgroup,havedemonstratedthatrootandstemextracts, mainlyfrombarkareoftenactiveagainstfungiandprotozoa(Da Costaetal.,2014).Thesepathogenexposedplantorgansshouldbe prioritizedfortargetcompoundsisolation.
Antifungal (85%) and leishmanicidal (23%) activity were observedfor26extractsfromthreespeciesoftheFabaceae fam-ily. E.ellipticumwas distinguishedby its activityagainst L.(L.)
amazonensis,especiallythestembarkethylacetateextract(IC50
9.23g/ml).S.aureumpresentednoactivityagainsttheparasite, butcuriouslysixroot/stemwoodandroot/stemethylacetateor ethanolextractsexhibiteddifferentialantifungalactivity(MIC0.12 to31.25g/ml).V. macrocarpa extractswerealso activeagainst bothmicro-organisms.Itsrootandstembarkareusedin super-ficialmycosestreatmentinAmazonia–traditionallyreferredtoas
angelim-do-cerrado or maleiteira(Piedade and Filho, 1988).The resultsfoundinTrichophytonmodelsareconsistentwiththis tra-ditionaluse.
FractionationofV.macrocarparootbarkEtOAcextractresulted in the isolation of a previously unreported vatacarpan (1) and knowncompoundmusizin(2).Vatacarpandemonstratednotable activityagainstC.albicansATCC10231(MIC0.98g/ml),an oppor-tunisticpathogenicfungiwhichisthemain etiologicalagentof candidiasis(PierceandLopez-Ribot,2013).
This work documentsthe activity of Cerrado plantextracts againstresistantclinicalfungalisolatesandLeishmania. Further-more,itconfirmstheneedtoconservetheCerradobiomehotspot withtheviewtodevelopingleadmolecules(DaCostaetal.,2014).
Authors’contributions
LSE,RBF and ERS conceived and designed the experiments; JEDPcollectedandidentifiedtheplantswiththeresearchgroup; DBS,RCDCandRMAconductedtheexperiments;RBFelucidated thestructuresof thecompounds;LSE,RBF, ERS, RMA,DBS and RCDC,contributedtodataanalysis;LSEandERScontributedwith reagents/materials/analysis tools and LSE, RBF, DBS,RCDC, ERS and RMA for paper writing. Allthe authorsapproved the final manuscript.
Conflictsofinterest
Theauthorsdeclarenoconflictsofinterest.
Acknowledgments
TheauthorswishtothankthefollowingBrazilianagenciesfor theirfinancialsupport:CNPq,CAPES,FAPDFandFINATEC.Weare grateful tothe Ministryof theEnvironment (CGEN/IBAMA) for authorizingbiologicalaccess.WealsoextendspecialthankstoDr. MariadoRosárioRodriguesSilvaforprovidingthefungalstrains.
AppendixA. Supplementarydata
Supplementarydataassociatedwiththisarticlecanbefound,in theonlineversion,atdoi:10.1016/j.bjp.2015.07.012.
References
Albernaz,L.C.,dePaula,J.E.,Romero,G.A.S.,Silva,M.R.R.,Grellier,P.,Mambu,L., Espindola,L.S.,2010.Investigationofplantextractsintraditionalmedicineof theBrazilianCerradoagainstprotozoansandyeasts.J.Ethnopharmacol.131, 116–121.
Albernaz,L.C.,Deville,A.,Dubost,L.,dePaula,J.E.,Bodo,B.,Grellier,P.,Espindola, L.S.,Mambu,L.,2012.SpiranthenonesAandB,tetraprenylatedphloroglucinol derivativesfromtheleavesofSpirantheraodoratissima.PlantaMed.78,459– 464.
Araújo,R.M.,Pinheiro,S.M.,Lima,M.A.S.,Silveira,E.R.,2008.CompleteNMRdata assignmentsfornovelpterocarpansfromHarpalycebrasiliana.Magn.Reson. Chem.46,890–893.
Baviloni,P.D.,DosSantos,M.P.,Aiko,G.M.,Reis,S.R.,Latorraca,M.Q.,DaSilva,V.C., Dall’oglio,E.L.,DeSousaJr.,P.T.,Lopes,C.F.,Baviera,A.M.,Kawashita,N.H.,2010.
Mechanismofanti-hyperglycemicactionofVataireamacrocarpa(Leguminosae): investigationinperipheraltissues.J.Ethnopharmacol.131,135–139.
CLSI,2008a.ClinicalandLaboratoryStandardsInstitute,CLSIM27-A3,3rded.
CLSI,2008b.ClinicalandLaboratoryStandardsInstitute,CLSIM38-A2,2nded.
CLSI,2012.ClinicalandLaboratoryStandardsInstitute,CLSIM27-S4,4thed.
Coelho,F.B.R.,DalBelo,C.A.,Lolis,S.F.,Santos,M.G.,2005.Levantamento etnofar-macológicorealizadonacomunidadeMumbucalocalizadanoJalapão–TO.Rev. Eletr.Farm.2,52–55.
Colombo,A.L.,Nucci,M.,Park,B.J.,Nouér,S.A.,Arthington-Skaggs,B.,daMatta,D.A., Warnock,D.,Morgan,J.,fortheBrazilianNetworkCandidemiaStudy,2006.
EpidemiologyofcandidemiainBrazil:anationwidesentinelsurveillanceof candidemiainelevenmedicalcenters.J.Clin.Microbiol.44,2816–2823.
Corrêa,M.P.,1984.DicionáriodeplantasúteisdoBrasiledasexóticascultivadas. ImprensaNacional,Riodejaneiro,pp.1926–1978,III,41.
Covell,C.J.,King,F.E.,Morgan,J.W.W.,1961.Thechemistryofextractivesfrom hard-woods.PartXXXI.2-Acetyl-1,8-dihydroxy-3-methylnaphthalene(musizin),a constituentofMaesopsiseminii.J.Chem.Soc.,702–706.
Da Costa,R.C.,Santana,D.B., Araújo,R.M.,de Paula,J.E.,DoNascimento,P.C., Lopes,N.P.,Braz-Filho,R.,Espindola,L.S.,2014.Discoveryoftherapanoneand suberononemixtureasamotifforleishmanicidalandantifungalapplications. Bioorg.Med.Chem.22,135–140.
DeAssis,P.A.,Theodoro,P.N.E.T.,dePaula,J.E.,Araújo,A.J.,Costa-Lotufo,L.V.,Michel, S.,Grougnet,R.,Kritsanida,M.,Espindola,L.S.,2014.Antifungalether digly-cosidesfromMataybaguianensisAublet.Bioorg.Med.Chem.Lett.24,1414– 1416.
DeMesquita,M.L.,Desrivot,J.,Bories,F.C.,Fournet,A.,dePaula,J.E.,Grellier,P., Espin-dola,L.S.,2005.AntileishmanialandtrypanocidalactivityofBrazilianCerrado plants.Mem.Inst.OswaldoCruz100,783–787.
Dewick,P.M.,2002.Medicinalnaturalproducts:abiosyntheticapproach,2nded. JohnWiley&Sons,NewYork,pp.515.
Dias,D.A.,Silva,C.A.,Urban,S.,2009.Naphthaleneaglyconesandglycosidesfrom theAustralianmedicinalplant,Dianellacallicarpa.PlantaMed.75,1442–1447.
Dias,D.A.,Urban,S.,Roessner,U.,2012.Ahistoricaloverviewofnaturalproductsin drugdiscovery.Metabolites2,303–336.
Goel,A.,Kumar,A.,Raghuvanshi,A.,2013.Synthesis,stereochemistry,structural classification,andchemicalreactivityofnaturalpterocarpans.Chem.Rev.113, 1614–1640.
Grannoum,M.A.,Long,L.,Cirino,A.J.,Miller,A.R.,Najafi,R.,Wang,L.,Sharma,K., Anderson,M.,Memarzadeh,B.,2013.EfficacyofNVC-422inthetreatmentof dermatophytosiscausedbyTrichophytonmentagrophytesusingaguineapig model.Int.J.Dermatol.52,567–571.
Harborne,J.B.,1978.AnnualProceedingsofthePhytochemicalSocietyofEurope, No.15:BiochemicalAspectsofPlantandAnimalCoevolution.AcademicPress, London.
Harvey,A.L.,Edrada-Ebel,R.,Quinn,R.J.,2015.There-emergenceofnaturalproducts fordrugdiscoveryinthegenomicsera.Nat.Rev.DrugDiscov.14,111–129.
Havlickova,B.,Czaika,V.A.,Friedrich,M.,2008.Epidemiologicaltrends inskin mycosesworldwide.Mycoses51,2–15.
Jesus,N.Z.T.,SilvaJúnior,I.F.,Lima,J.C.S.,Colodel,E.M.,Martins,D.T.O.,2012. Hip-pocraticscreeningandsubchronicoraltoxicityassessmentsofthemethanol extractofVataireamacrocarpaheartwoodinrodents.Rev.Bras.Farmacogn.22, 1308–1314.
Jiménez-González,L.,Álvarez-Corral,M.,Muˇnoz-Dorado,M.,Rodríguez-García,I., 2008.Pterocarpans:interestingnaturalproductswithantifungalactivityand otherbiologicalproperties.Phytochem.Rev.7,125–154.
Lee,K.H.,Rhee,K.H.,2013.AntimalarialactivityofnepodinisolatedfromRumex crispus.Arch.Pharm.Res.36,430–435.
Li,X.H.,McLaughlin,J.L.,1989. BioactivecompoundsfromtherootofMyrsine africana.J.Nat.Prod.52,660–662.
MeloeSilva,F.M.,dePaula,J.E.,Espindola,L.S.,2009.Evaluationoftheantifungal potentialofBrazilianCerradomedicinalplants.Mycoses52,511–517.
Mimaki,Y.,Harada,H.,Sakuma,C.,Haraguchib,M.,Yui,S.,Kudo,T.,Yamazaki, M.,Sashida,Y.,2004.ContortisiliosidesA-G:isolationofsevennewtriterpene bisdesmosidesfromEnterolobiumcontortisiliquumandtheircytotoxicactivity. Helv.Chim.Acta87,851–865.
Mu˜noz,V.,Sauvain,M.,Bourdy,G.,Callapa,J.,Bergeron,S.,Rojas,I.,Bravo,J.A., Balder-rama,L.,Ortiz,B.,Gimenez,A.,Deharo,E.,2000.Asearchfornaturalbioactive compoundsinBoliviathroughamultidisciplinaryapproach.PartI.Evaluation oftheantimalarialactivityofplantsusedbytheChacoboIndians.J. Ethnophar-macol.69,127–137.
Oliveira,H.C.,Santos,M.P.,Grigulo,R.,Lima,L.L.,Martins,D.T.O.,Lima,J.C.S., Stop-piglia,L.F.,Lopes,C.F.,Kawashita,N.H.,2008.AntidiabeticactivityofVatairea macrocarpaextractinrats.J.Ethnopharmacol.115,515–519.
Piedade, L.F., Filho, W.W., 1988. Antraquinonas de Vatairea guianensis Aubl. (Fabaceae).ActaAmazon18,185–187.
Pierce,C.G.,Lopez-Ribot,J.L.,2013.Candidiasisdrugdiscoveryanddevelopment: newapproachestargetingvirulencefordiscoveringandidentifyingnewdrugs. ExpertOpin.DrugDiscov.8,1117–1126.
Puig-Asensio,M.,Pemán,J.,Zaragoza,R.,Garnacho-Montero,J.,Martín-Mazuelos,E., Cuenca-Estrella,M.,Almirante,B.,onbehalfoftheProspectivePopulationStudy onCandidemiainSpain(CANDIPOP)Project,HospitalInfectionStudyGroup (GEIH)andMedicalMycologyStudyGroup(GEMICOMED)oftheSpanishSociety ofInfectiousDiseasesandClinicalMicrobiology(SEIMC),andSpanishNetwork forResearchinInfectiousDiseases,2014.ImpactofTherapeuticStrategieson thePrognosisofCandidemiaintheICU.Crit.CareMed.42,1423–1432.
Rodrigues, E., 2007. Plants of restricted use indicated by three cultures in Brazil(Caboclo-riverdweller,IndianandQuilombola).J.Ethnopharmacol.111, 295–302.
Silva,E.M.,Araújo,R.M.,Freire-Filha,L.G.,Silveira,E.R.,Lopes,N.P.,dePaula,J.E., Braz-Filho,R.,Espindola,L.S.,2013.Clusiaxanthoneandtocotrienolseriesfrom Clusiapernambucensisandtheirantileishmanialactivity.J.Braz.Chem.Soc.24, 1314–1321.
Sousa,B.L.,SilvaFilho,J.C., Kumar,P.,Pereira,R.I., Łyskowski,A.,Rocha, B.A., Delatorre,P.,Bezerra,G.A.,Nagano,C.S.,Gruber,K.,Cavada,B.S.,2015. High-resolutionstructureofanewTnantigen-bindinglectinfromVataireamacrocarpa andacomparativeanalysisofTn-bindinglegumelectins.Int.J.Biochem.Cell Biol.59,103–110.
Vandeputte,P.,Ferrari,S.,Coste,A.T.,2012.Antifungalresistanceandnewstrategies tocontrolfungalinfections.Int.J.Microbiol.2012,1–26.
Vasconcelos, M.A., Arruda, F.V., Carneiro, V.A., Silva, H.C., Nascimento, K.S., Sampaio, A.H., Cavada, B., Teixeira, E.H., Henriques, M., Pereira, M.O., 2014. Effectof algaeand plantlectinson planktonicgrowth andbiofilm formation in clinically relevant bacteria and yeasts. BioMed. Res. Int.,
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/365272.