h ttp : / / w w w . b j m i c r o b i o l . c o m . b r /
Food
Microbiology
Occurrence
and
characteristics
of
extended
spectrum
beta-lactamases-producing
Enterobacteriaceae
from
foods
of
animal
origin
˙Ismail
Hakkı
Tekiner
∗,
Haydar
Özpınar
DepartmentofFoodEngineering,IstanbulAydınUniversity,FloryaCampus,Sefaköy,Küc¸ükc¸ekmece,Istanbul,Turkey
a
r
t
i
c
l
e
i
n
f
o
Articlehistory: Received16April2015 Accepted12November2015 Availableonline2March2016 AssociateEditor:AnaLúciadaCosta Darini Keywords: Blagene Enterobacteriaceae ESBL Publichealth Turkey
a
b
s
t
r
a
c
t
Presenceofextendedspectrumbeta-lactamases(ESBL)inbacteriaisagrowinghealth con-cernofglobalsignificance.Thelocal,regional,national,andinternationalepidemiological studiesforextended spectrumbeta-lactamases-producing Enterobacteriaceaeand their encodinggenesinfoodsarestillincomplete.Theobjectiveofthisstudywastodeterminethe occurrenceofextendedspectrumbeta-lactamases-producingEnterobacteriaceaeandthe characteristicsoftheirencodinggenesfromatotalof250samplesofvariousfoodsof animal-origin(100rawchickenmeat,100rawcowmilk,and50rawcowmilkcheese)soldinTurkey. Overall,55isolateswerepositiveasextendedspectrumbeta-lactamases-producing Entero-bacteriaceae.The mostprevalent extendedspectrum beta-lactamases-producing strain wereidentifiedasEscherichiacoli(80%),followedbyEnterobactercloacae(9.1%),Citrobacter braakii(5.5%),Klebsiellapneumoniae(3.6%),andCitrobacterwerkmanii(1.8%)byVitek®MS.The
simultaneousproductionofextendedspectrumbeta-lactamasesandAmpCwasdetectedin fiveisolates(9.1%)inE.coli(80%)andE.cloacae(20%).ThefrequencyratesofblaTEM,blaCTX-M,
andblaSHV were96.4%,53.7%,and34.5%,respectively.Theco-existenceofbla-geneswas
observedin82%ofextendedspectrumbeta-lactamasesproducerswithadistributionof blaTEM&blaCTX-M(52.7%),blaTEM&blaSHV(20%),blaTEM&blaCTX-M&blaSHV(12.7%),andblaSHV
&blaCTX-M(1.8%).ThemostprevalentvariantofblaCTX-MclusterswasdefinedasblaCTX-M-1
(97.2%),followedbyblaCTX-M-8(2.8%).Insummary,theanalysedfoodswerefoundtobe
pos-ingahealthriskforTurkishconsumersduetocontaminationbyEnterobacteriaceaewitha diversityofextendedspectrumbeta-lactamasesencodinggenes.
©2016SociedadeBrasileiradeMicrobiologia.PublishedbyElsevierEditoraLtda.Thisis anopenaccessarticleundertheCCBY-NC-NDlicense
(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
∗ Correspondingauthor.
E-mail:ihakkitekiner@aydin.edu.tr(˙I.H.Tekiner).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjm.2015.11.034
1517-8382/©2016SociedadeBrasileiradeMicrobiologia.PublishedbyElsevierEditoraLtda.ThisisanopenaccessarticleundertheCC BY-NC-NDlicense(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
Introduction
Antibioticsareusedasveterinaryandhumanmedicinesfor treatment,controlandpreventionofinfectiousdiseases. How-ever,theirrepeatedoff-labeloverusecanhaveun-anticipated adverseeffectsincludingdevelopmentofantibioticresistance inthebacteriatowardsmodernbeta-lactamantibiotics.1
Oneoftheantibioticresistancemechanismsinthebacteria istheproductionofspecificenzymessuchasbeta-lactamase tobreakdownthefour-atombeta-lactamringofthe antibi-otics.Whenthisringisopenedthroughhydrolysisbythese enzymes,the antimicrobialpropertiesoftheantibioticsare completely lost.2 The extended spectrum beta-lactamases
(ESBL)are the rapidly evolving plasmid-mediated group of beta-lactamases.3 ESBL canhydrolyse penicillins, first,
sec-ondandthird-generationcephalosporins,andaztreonam(but notcephamycinsorcarbapenems).TheactivityofESBLcanbe inhibitedbybeta-lactamaseinhibitorssuchasclavulanicacid (CLA).4 Theantibioticresistanceleadstoincreased
morbid-ity,mortalityandthecostoftreatinginfections,inparticular, thosecausedbyESBL-producingbacteria.5Themostprevalent
extendedspectrumbeta-lactamasesareTEM,SHV,andCTX-M variants.6TheCTX-Mvariantsarealsoclusteredinfivemajor
groups:1,2,8,9,and25.7After2000s,CTX-Mtypeenzymes
haveexhibitedarapidgrowthoverawiderangegeographic areas,andhavebecomemuchmoreprevalentthanTEMand SHVtypeenzymes.8
TheESBLs are mainlyencoded byplasmids and mobile genetic elements such as integrons, insertion sequences, transposonsandplasmids.Thesegeneticelementsare eas-ilytransferabletootherbacteriasuchasthosebelongingto Enterobacteriaceae.5,9 Thewidespread use ofthird
genera-tioncephalosporinsandaztreonamhasledtotheemergence anddisseminationofESBLproducingstrainsandtheir encod-inggenes,inparticular,amongEnterobacteriaceaeassociated withsevereentericillnesses.10–13
ThemajorgenesresponsibleforESBLproductioninclude TEM genes (blaTEM), SHV genes (blaSHV), and CTX-Mgenes (blaCTX-M).14 Thiscontinued evolution isaserious threatto the public health by limiting the ability to treat bacterial infections.15,16Mostofthemedicinesunderhuman
consump-tion are antibiotics. Moreover, antibiotic use in veterinary medicineandforgrowthpromotionanddiseaseprevention inagriculture, aquaculture and horticulture is alsoa huge problemofantibioticresistance,sincemostoftheantibiotics manufactured(100,000–200,000tonnesperyear)isestimated to be massively consumed by these sectors, especially in the food-producing animals for last 60 years.17,18
There-fore,food-producinganimalsandfoodsofanimal-originare under suspicion forbeing transmission vectors for coloni-sation and infection of the humans with ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae.11,16
The potential contribution of foods to human health risks by dissemination of plasmid-born ESBLs should be epidemiologicallyassessedbecauselocal,regional,national andinternationalinformationrelatedtothisemerging phe-nomenon is largely incomplete in various geographical locations,includingTurkey.9,19TheTurkishauthoritiesaccept
thattheuseofantibioticsinthefoodanimalstomakethem
growfaster and/ortopreventdisease cannotbecontrolled effectively due to the economic benefits of food-animals, as the sector largely ignores risks associatedwith human andanimalhealth.20Therefore,chickenmeat,rawmilkand
cheese can be identified ashigh risk-carrying contributors for ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae and their encoding genes.9
Theobjectiveofthisstudywastodeterminetheoccurrence ofESBL-producingEnterobacteriaceaeandthefrequencyrates ofcorrespondingencodinggenesinvariousfoodsofanimal originsoldinTurkey.
Materials
and
methods
Referencecultures
AnESBL-negativestrain Escherichia coliATCC®25922and an ESBL-positivestrainKlebsiellapneumoniaeATCC®700603were used asnegative and positive controls,respectively, in the phenotypicandgenotypicmethods.
Sampling,samplepreparation,isolationandidentification ofESBLsuspiciousbacteria
DuringtheperiodofMay2014toNovember2014,atotalof250 foodsamplesofanimalorigin(100packedrawchickenmeat frompublicbazaars,marketsandpoultryfarms,100rawcow milkfromcontainersandholdingtanksinbazaarsanddairy farms,and50unpackedrawcowmilkcheesefrombazaarsand markets)wererandomlycollectedindifferentcitiesof Mar-mara,AegeanandBlackSearegions.Allsampleswereplaced intosamplingbags,andtakentothelaboratoryinathermobox containerat4◦C.Thesamplepreparationandfurther exami-nationswerequicklystartedafterthesampling.
Tenmillilitresofrawmilkin90mLofEnterobacteriaceae EnrichmentBroth(LABM,Lancashire,England),and25geither ofrawcow milk,cheese orrawchicken meatin 225mLof thementionedbrothwashomogenisedinasterilebag (Inter-science,SaintNom,France)for2minbyastomacher(EasyMix, AESChemunex,Rennes,France),andfollowedbyanaerobic incubationat37◦Cfor18–24h.21Afterthat,10Lofthe
pre-enrichedsuspensionwasdirectlystreakedontoChromaticTM ESBLselectivemedia(Liofilchem,Istanbul,Turkey).The inoc-ulatedplateswereincubatedat37◦Cfor18–24hunderaerobic conditionaspertothemanufacturer’sinstructions.The pre-sumptiveESBLcolonieswerethensub-culturedontoTryptic SoyAgar(LABM,Lancashire,England),followedbyan incuba-tionat37◦Cfor18–48h.Thespeciesidentificationofsuspected ESBLisolateswasperformedbyVitek®MS(bioMérieux,Marcy l’Etoile,France).
ScreeningandconfirmationofESBLs
Presumptive ESBL-producers were screened using cefpo-doxime(CPD;10g),cefotaxime(CTX;30g),andceftazidime (CAZ;30g)antibioticdiscs(MASTGroup,UK).A0.5 McFar-landstandardinoculumoftheisolatewasspreadontoMueller Hinton Agar(LABM, Lancashire, England) plates.Thediscs wereinsertedontheplate,andallowedforincubationat37◦C
Table1–Primerdesign,sequences,ampliconsizesandthermocyclerconditionsforbla-genesaccordingto23,24.
Primer(F/R) Sequence Ampliconsize(bp) Thermocyclercondition(TC)
blaTEM-F 5-GCTCACCCAGAAACGCTGGT-3 686 TC-1
blaTEM-R 5-CCATCTGGCCCCAGTGCTGC-3
blaSHV-F 5-CCCGCAGCCGCTTGAGCAAA-3 733 TC-2
blaSHV-R 5-CATGCTCGCCGGCGTATCCC-3
blaCTX-M-F 5-SCSATGTGCAGYACCAGTAA-3 585 TC-3
blaCTX-M-R 5-ACCAGAAYVAGCGGBGC-3
blaCTX-M-1-F 5-AAAAATCACTGCGCCAGTTC 415 TC-4
blaCTX-M-1-R 5-AGCTTATTCATCGCCACGTT
blaCTX-M-2-F 5-CGACGCTACCCCTGCTATT 552
blaCTX-M-2-R 5-CCAGCGTCAGATTTTTCAGG
blaCTX-M-8-F 5-TCGCGTTAAGCGGATGATGC 666
blaCTX-M-8-R 5-AACCCACGATGTGGGTAGC
blaCTX-M-9-F 5-CAAAGAGAGTGCAACGGATG 205
blaCTX-M-9-R 5-ATTGGAAAGCGTTCATCACC
blaCTX-M-25-F 5-GCACGATGACATTCGGG 327
blaCTX-M-25-R 5-AACCCACGATGTGGGTAGC
TC-1:1cyclefor15minat95◦C,followedby35cyclesfor1minat95◦C,1minat63◦C,and1minat72◦C,andfinally10minat72◦C. TC-2:1cyclefor15minat95◦C,followedby30cyclesfor30sat94◦C,30sat58.5◦C,and45sat72◦C,andfinally10minat72◦C.
TC-3:1cyclefor15minat95◦C,followedby30cyclesfor30sat94◦C,30sat55◦C,and45sat72◦C,andafinalelongationat72◦Cfor10min. TC-4:1cyclefor15minat94◦C;5cyclesfor25sat94◦C,40sat52◦C,and50sat72◦C,followedby22cyclesfor25sat94◦C,40sat54◦C,and 50sat72◦C,andafinalelongationat72◦Cfor6min.
for18–24h.Thebreakpointswithzonediameterswere eval-uatedaccordingtothecriteriaestablishedby.22TheESBLSet
D67C(MASTGroup,UK)withacombinationofCPD,CTX,and CAZ±clavulanate(CLA,10g)wasusedfordiscdiffusion con-firmationtest.Thediscinsertedplateswereincubatedat37◦C for18–24h.Thezoneofinhibitionwasevaluatedaccordingto thecriteriadescribedby22.
Determinationofminimalinhibitoryconcentration(MIC) Micronaut-S beta-lactamase VII Plate (Merlin Diagnostika, Berlin,Germany) was usedforthe phenotypicdetection of ESBL-production, including AmpC, metallo-beta-lactamase (MBL), and carbapenemase (KPC) according to the criteria describedby22.A50Laliquotof0.5McFarland-standardised microbialsuspensionoftheisolatewasinitiallyvortexedin 10mLofMuellerHintonBroth(Merck,Darmstadt,Germany). Subsequently,100Lofthissuspensionwaspipettedintoeach welloftheplate.Afterthat,theplatewasincubatedovernight at37◦C.ThereadingwasrecordedusingaThermofisher Mul-tiskanFCSpectrometer.TheMICanalysiswasautomatically performedbytheMCN6Software(Sifin,Berlin,Germany). ExtractionofbacterialDNA
TotalDNAofESBL-producingisolateswasextractedusingthe GENESpin DNA Isolation Kit(Eurofins, Hamburg, Germany) accordingtothe manufacturer’sinstructions.Theextracted DNAsampleswerestoredat–20◦Cforfurthermolecular anal-yses.
Characterisationoftheblavariants
Theprimerpairsaspreviouslydescribedby23wereusedfor screeningofblaTEM,blaSHVandblaCTX-M.TheblaCTX-Mvariants (blaCTX-M-1, blaCTX-M-2, blaCTX-M-8, blaCTX-M-9, and blaCTX-M-25)
weresub-characterisedaccordingto24.Allprimerswere pre-paredbyFullgenBiotechnologyand ˙Iontek(˙Istanbul,Turkey). TheamplificationwasperformedbyaThermalCycler PTC-0200G DNA Engine (BioRad, Istanbul, Turkey). The blaTEM,
blaSHVandblaCTX-MwereamplifiedinasingleplexPCRassay while a multiplex PCR assay was performed for blaCTX-M variants. The PCR mixtures were prepared in a final vol-ume of25L. All PCR conditions were optimised again as showninTable1.Gel-electrophoresisofthePCRproductswas performedona1.5%agarose-gel.Theampliconswere photo-graphed by GelDoc 2000imagingsystem (BioRad, Istanbul, Turkey).Finally,theanalysiswascarried-outusingQuantity One4.6.3GelDocXRSoftware(BioRad,Istanbul,Turkey). Statisticalanalysis
TheKruskal–WallisH-testwasusedformultiplecomparison oftheproportionsofESBLproducersintheirsamplinggroups. TheteststatisticHwasapproximatedbya2distribution.All statisticalanalyseswereperformedusingSPSS19(SPSSInc., USA)statisticalpackageprogramme,andaP-value<0.05was consideredasstatisticallysignificant.
Results
Inthisstudy,wescreened,forESBL-producing Enterobacte-riaceae, 100 raw chicken meat samples, 100 rawcow milk samples, and50rawcow milkcheesesamplesfrom differ-ent cities of Marmara, Agean and Black Sea regions, and subsequentlycharacterisedtheirencodingblaTEM,blaSHVand
blaCTX-Mvariants.
Phenotypicresults
Thephenotypictestingindicatedthatatotalof55isolates(29 inrawchickenmeat,24inrawcowmilk,and2inrawcowmilk
Table2–ScreeningresultsofthesamplesforESBL-producingEnterobacteriaceae.
Origin Noofsample(n,%) NoofESBL+isolates(n,%) Species-baseddistribution(n,%)
E.coli E.cloacae K.pneumoniae C.brakii C.werkmanii
Rawchickenmeat 100(40%) 29(52.7%) 24(82.8%) 2(6.9%) 2(6.9%) – 1(3.4%)
Rawcowmilk 100(40%) 24(43.6%) 18(75%) 3(12.5%) – 3(12.5%) –
Rawcowmilkcheese 50(20%) 2(3.7%) 2(100%) – – – –
Total 250(100%) 55(100%) 44(80%) 5(9.1%) 2(3.6%) 3(5.5%) 1(1.8%)
cheese)from250foodsamplesofanimaloriginwerepositive forESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae.Themostprevalent phenotypewasE.coli(80%), followedbyEnterobactercloacae
(9.1%),Citrobacterbraakii(5.5%),K.pneumoniae(3.6%),and Cit-robacterwerkmanii(1.8%)(Table2).
Thedisc approximation tests were performed by using CPD, CAZ, and CTX±CLA containing discs according to the criteria set by 22. The average zone differences of CAZ±CLA, CTX±CLA and CPD±CLA were found as 6.83±3.66mm, 11.97±6.08mm and 12.76±6.06mm in chicken meat, respectively, and 7.92±5.07mm, 13.33±4.78mmand12.63±7.11mmincowmilk,respectively, while10.00±0.00mm, 15.00±4.24mm and 14.50±2.12mm incowmilkcheese,respectively(Table3).
TheMICdeterminationrevealedthat62.1%oftheisolates fromrawchickenmeatwereresistanttoCTX,55.2%toCAZ, 51.7%toCEP,20.6%toCOX,and6.9%toCMC,whileamong theisolatesfromrawcowmilk,79.2%wereresistanttoCAZ, 75%toCTX,66.6%toCEP,54.2%toCOX,4.2%toERT,and4.2% toCMC.Two isolatesfrom raw-cow-milkcheesewere100% resistanttoCTX,CAZ,CEP,andCMC.
Amongthe55ESBLproducers,fiveisolates(9.1%)werealso positiveforAmpC.Basedonthespecies,theAmpC-producing isolateswereE.coli(80%)andE.cloacae(20%)fromrawchicken meat(n=1),rawcow milk(n=3),and raw-cow-milkcheese (n=1).TheywereresistanttoCAZ(100%),CTXandCEP(80%), CMC(40%),andCOX(20%).
Genotypicresults
Inthegenotypicanalysis,thePCRproductswereidentified:53 asblaTEM,36asblaCTX-M,and19asblaSHV.Inthe36blaCTX-M, 35 were clustered asblaCTX-M-1, and one asblaCTX-M-8. The
blaTEMwasfoundinmultiplecombinationswithblaCTX-M-1&
blaCTX-M-8in29,withblaSHVin11,andwithblaSHV&blaCTX-M-1
in7.TheblaSHVwasdetectedinacombinationwithblaCTX-M-1 onlyinoneinstance.Ofthe44E.coliisolates,representingthe mostprevalentESBL-producingphenotype,aco-existing dis-tributionofblageneswasobservedasblaTEM&blaCTX-M-1in25,
blaSHV&blaTEMinsix,blaSHV&blaTEM&blaCTX-M-1in6,blaSHV &blaCTX-M-1inone,blaTEM&blaCTX-M-8inone,blaTEMalonein four,andblaCTX-M-1aloneinone,respectively(Table4).
Statisticalresults
ThemultiplecomparisonoftheproportionsofESBLproducers intheirsamplinggroupswasperformedusingKruskal–Wallis H-test (H=5.935; P<0.05). Thetest statistic H was approxi-matedby2distribution(CI95%;2=12.5291;P=0.001).Since
Hwaslessthan2,nostatisticallysignificantdifferencewas observedfortheassociationbetweenESBLproportionsand theirsamplinggroups(P<0.05)withrespecttothefoodtypes ofanimalorigin.
Discussion
Inthisstudy,wescreenedforESBL-producing Enterobacteria-ceaefromrawchickenmeat,rawcowmilkandraw-cow-milk cheese samples. Subsequently, we characterised genotypi-cally their encodinggenes. The resultshighlighted that 55 isolateswerepositiveforESBL-producingEnterobacteriaceae; ESBL-producingE.coli(80%)wasthemostfrequentspecies;a combinationofblaTEM&blaCTX-M(52.7%)wasthemost com-monpattern;andthemajorvariantofblaCTX-Mwasdefinedas
blaCTX-M-1(97.2%),respectively.
The ESBL encoding genetic elements are transferable betweenthesameanddifferentbacterialspecies.4,25Astudy reported that the antibiotic residues in calf urine resulted in amplification of the populations of antibiotic resistant
Table3–ZonediametersofCPD,CTX,andCAZ±CLA.
Antibioticagent Rawchickenmeat(n=29) Rawcowmilk(n=24) Raw-cow-milkcheese(n=2) Mean(mm) Std.deviation(±mm) Mean(mm) Std.deviation(±mm) Mean(mm) Std.deviation(±mm)
CAZ 18.24 5.125 16.25 4.057 14.5 3.536 CAZCLA 25.07 6 24.17 4.603 24.5 3.536 1 6.83 3.665 7.92 5.073 10 0 CTX 15.59 6.196 11.29 4.428 12 1.414 CTXCLA 27.55 6.3 24.63 4.817 27 5.657 2 11.97 6.08 13.33 4.779 15 4.243 CPD 7.03 5.723 2.13 4.047 6 0 CPDCLA 19.79 5.87 14.75 7.837 20.5 2.121 3 12.76 6.063 12.63 7.113 14.5 2.121
Table4–genotypiccharacteristicsof55ESBL-producers isolated. Source Species Noof isolates ESBL-type detectedbyPCR Rawchicken meat
E.coli 3 blaTEM
E.coli 12 blaTEM&
blaCTX-M-1
E.coli 1 blaTEM&
blaCTX-M-8
E.coli 6 blaTEM&blaSHV
E.coli 2 blaTEM&blaSHV&
blaCTX-M-1
E.cloacae 1 blaTEM
E.cloacae 1 blaTEM&blaSHV
C.werkmanii 1 blaTEM
K.pneumoniae 2 blaTEM&blaSHV&
blaCTX-M-1
Rawcowmilk E.coli 1 blaTEM
E.coli 13 blaTEM&
blaCTX-M-1
E.coli 1 blaSHV&
blaCTX-M-1
E.coli 3 blaTEM&blaSHV&
blaCTX-M-1
E.cloacae 3 blaTEM
C.brakii 3 blaTEM&blaSHV
Raw-cow-milk cheese
E.coli 1 blaTEM&blaSHV&
blaCTX-M-1
E.coli 1 blaCTX-M-1
bacteriainthepensoil;andpresumably,thisincreasedthe probabilityoftransmissionoftheseresistantpopulationsto calvesandthentheanimal-derivedfoodchain.26Thismight
leadto arisk forinfection and colonisation ofthe human intestinalmicrobiomewithESBLproducingbacteriasuchasE. coli,E.cloacae,Klebsiellaspp.,Salmonellaspp.,Proteusspp.and Citrobacterspp.,throughvariousfoodsofanimalorigin27–30;
whenthesefoodsaredirectlyconsumedwithoutundergoing anythermalprocess,orusedforrawmilkcheeseproduction.31
Duetothisthreat,theCodexAlimentariusCommission estab-lishedanintergovernmentaltaskforce.32 Followingthat, in
2014,theStandardCommitteeofEuropeanDoctors(CPME), theCouncil ofEuropeanDentists(CED)andthe Federation of Veterinarians of Europe (FVE) issued a common press releaseforalltheauthoritiestomanagetheproblemof ESBL-producingEnterobacteriaceae(www.fve.org).Inourstudy,a highoccurrenceofESBLproducersandtheirencodinggenes intheexaminedfoodsofanimaloriginindicateahealthrisk fortheTurkishconsumers.
Sincethe early2000s, E. colihasbecomethe most con-cerned member for infection and colonisation of the food animals.33–36 AnESBL-producing E.coliassociatedmortality
wasthree-timeshigherthannon-ESBLproducingE.coli.37The
NationalSurveillance Networkbythe MinistryofHealth in Turkey(www.uhes.saglik.gov.tr) has reported an increasing prevalenceofESBL-producingE.coli(33.2%in2008and48.83% in2013)andESBL-producingK.pneumoniae(40%in2008and 49.69%in2013).However,theroleoffoodsinthe dissemina-tionofESBL-producingbacteriaandtheirencodinggenesto humanshasnotbeenaddressedsofarinTurkey.Inourstudy, thefrequencyofESBL-producingE.coliwassimilartothose
reportedinPortugal(85%)38andSpain(93.3%),33whileitwas
higherthanthosereportedinDenmark(1.3%),39India(3.1%),40
China(12.4%),41Germany(53.9%),42Belgium(45%),43Austria
(24%)44andTaiwan(10.5%).36OurstudyalsopointsE.colibeing
animportantfoodborneESBLcarrier.
Numerousphenotypic methods havebeen developedto detectESBLproductionbyEnterobacteriaceae.However,itis not still clearwhich tests are the mostsensitive.45 In our
study,thephenotypicscreeningandconfirmationofESBL pro-ductionwereperformedbythediscapproximationtests.All oftheuseddisc combinationsshowed goodsensitivitiesin accordancewiththecriteriaestablishedby22.Afterthedisc approximation tests,MIC wasdetermined duetothe pres-ence ofESBL encoding genes on the same plasmid.46 The
MIC revealedthat55 ESBLproducerswereresistant toCTX (MIC≥4g/mL) and CAZ (MIC≥16g/mL), and partly vari-able to CPD (MIC≥8g/mL). Basically, TEM and SHV type beta-lactamases are resistant to CAZ, and variable toCTX whileCTX-Mtypebeta-lactamaseexhibitsresistancetoCPD and variable to CAZ because CTX-M type beta-lactamase may escape from screening by CAZ. A survey in Europe reportedthatupto33%ofESBLsstrainsremainedundetected, therefore, in this case, genotypic confirmation is further needed.47–50Inourstudy,thephenotypicresultsindicatedthat
TEMand CTX-Mtypebetalactamaseswere themost com-monlyencounteredESBLs.
The co-existenceofESBL and AmpC beta-lactamasesis a worldwide growing concern.5,51 ESBL and AmpC
produc-ing enterobacteriahavebeenclinicallyreportedas19.5%in Europe,andas13.9%inTurkey.52,53 Inourstudy,AmpC
pro-ducers were E. coliand E. cloacae,asreported earlier.52,54,55
Failure to detect these beta lactamaseshas contributed to their uncontrolled spread and sometimes the consequent therapeutic failures.56 For Enterobacteriaceae, the use of either cefepime (CEP) or cefpirome (CPO)±CLA is recom-mended sincetheyareun-affectedbyAmpC.51Incontrast,
ourresultsrevealedthatAmpCproducerswere100% resis-tant to CEP+CLA. This indicates that the techniques to detectAmpCbeta-lactamasearestillevolvingandarenotyet optimised.57
The genotypic characterisation by PCR assays revealed thatblaTEMwasthemostfrequentgene,followedbyblaCTX-M and blaSHV.InTurkey,the clinicallyreportedmostfrequent beta-lactamasetypewasCTX-M,followedbyTEMandSHV, whileanotherstudyreportedafrequencyofSHVhigherthan TEM.15,58,59Ourgenotypicresultsreportingthemostfrequent
genesasblaTEM&blaCTX-Mwerealsoepidemiologically simi-lartothemostcommonlyencounteredESBLencodinggenes inchickenmeatfromEasternEuropeandNearEast,7
South-ern America,30,60 Tunisia,61 Northern Europeancountries,33
Japan,62,63Germany,64China,35Austria65andIndia,40followed
bytherawmilkfromSpain,21England66andTaiwan36,and
bythecheeseanddairyproductsfromPortugal,38England,66
Iran67 and Egypt,68 respectively. However, the foodborne
ESBL-producingbacteriaandtheirencodinggenesinTurkey havenotbeen addressedtilldate,andthe foodborne beta-lactamases have been studied only bydisc approximation testing,excludinggenotypiccharacterisation.69–71 Therefore,
ourstudyconfirmsthatthefoodsofanimalorigininTurkey arepotentialreservoirsofdiverseESBLencodinggeneswith
aco-resistancepattern,whichcanbedisseminatedtoclinical andcommunitysettings.
WedetectedCTX-M-1clusterasthemostprevalent sub-typeofCTX-Mtypebetalactamases.Chromosomalblagene, kluC,presentinKluyveracryocrescensistheancestorof CTX-M-1cluster.72 TheCTX-MtypeESBLsarecurrentlyrecognised
as the part ofthe mostthreatening mechanism of antibi-oticresistanceinclinical andcommunitysettings,virtually invadingallhumanandanimalcompartmentsaswellasthe environmentallovertheworld,andareincreasinglybeing pre-dominantforminEnterobacteriaceaeworldwide.47,72–74South
AmericaisknownasanimportantsourceofCTX-MtypeESBL originatedfromclinicalsettings.75InTurkey,CTX-M-1group
wasfoundin86.8%oftheclinicalE.coliisolates.76Ourresults
showedthatthedisseminationofCTX-M-1clusterwasnot restrictedtotheclinicalsettings,butalsoinvolvedthefoods ofanimalorigin,causingrapid,importantandunpredictable changesintheepidemiologyofantibioticresistance.75
In 2007, European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) recom-mendedthatbacterialstrainscontainingtransferable resis-tancegenesshouldnotbeusedinanimalfeedsandfermented andprobiotic foods forhumanuse.77,78 However,theissue
ofantibioticsresistancebacteriainfoods hasnotyetbeen seriouslyraisedasahealthsafety indicator.Inconclusion, thefoodsofanimaloriginsoldinTurkeyhavebeenfoundas potentialreservoirsfordiverseESBL-producing Enterobacteri-aceaeandtheirencodinggeneswithaco-resistancepattern, thusposingacriticalhealthriskfortheTurkishconsumers.
Disclaimer
Thisarticleis basedon the Doctoralthesis entitled “Char-acterization of Extended Spectrum Beta-Lactamases in Enterobacteriaceaefrom FoodsUsing MolecularMethod”by ˙IsmailHakkıTekiner,2015,DepartmentofFoodEngineering, InstituteofNaturalandAppliedSciences,IstanbulAydın Uni-versity,TR-34295Istanbul,Turkey.
Conflicts
of
interest
Theauthorsdeclarethatthereisnoconflictofinterest.
r
e
f
e
r
e
n
c
e
s
1.WangH,McEntireJC,ZhangL,LiX,DoyleM.Thetransferof
antibioticresistancefromfoodtohumans:facts,
implicationsandfuturedirections.RevSciTech.
2012;31:249–260.
2.ThenmozhiS,MoorthyK,SureshkumarBT,SureshM.
AntibioticresistancemechanismofESBLproducing
Enterobacteriaceaeinclinicalfield:areview.IntJPureAppl
Biosci.2014;2:207–226.
3.PatersonDL,BonomoRA.Extended-spectrum-lactamases:
aclinicalupdate.ClinMicrobiolRev.2005;18:657–686.
4.RuppME,FeyPD.Extendedspectrumbeta-lactamase
(ESBL)-producingEnterobacteriaceae:considerationsfor
diagnosis,preventionanddrugtreatment.Drugs.
2003;63:353–365.
5.EFSA.Scientificopiniononthepublichealthrisksof
bacterialstrainsproducingextended-spectrum-lactamases
and/orAmpC-lactamasesinfoodandfood-producing
animals.EFSAJ.2011;9:2322–2417.
6.LiebanaE,CarattoliA,CoqueTM,etal.Publichealthrisksof
enterobacterialisolatesproducingextended-spectrum
-lactamasesorAmpC-lactamasesinfoodand
food-producinganimals:anEUperspectiveofepidemiology,
analyticalmethods,riskfactors,andcontroloptions.Clin
InfectDis.2013;56:1030–1037.
7.BonnetR.Growinggroupofextended-spectrum
-lactamases:theCTX-Menzymes.AntimicrobAgents
Chemother.2004;48:1–14.
8.FernandesR,AmadorP,OliveiraC,PrudêncioC.Molecular characterizationofESBL-producingEnterobacteriaceaein NorthernPortugal.SciWorldJ.2014;2014:782897,
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/782897.
9.Giedraitien ˙eA,Vitkauskien ˙eA,Naginien ˙eR,PavilonisA.
Antibioticresistancemechanismsofclinicallyimportant
bacteria.Medicina(Kaunas).2011;47:137–146.
10.MesaRJ,BlancV,BlanchAR,etal.Extended-spectrum
-lactamase-producingEnterobacteriaceaeindifferent
environments(humans,food,animalfarmsandsewage).J
AntimicrobChemother.2006;58:211–215.
11.ReulandEA,alNaiemiN,RaadsenSA,SavelkoulPHM,
KluytmansJAJW,Vandenbroucke-GraulsCMJE.Prevalenceof
ESBL-producingEnterobacteriaceaeinrawvegetables.EurJ
ClinMicrobiolInfectDis.2014;33:1843–2184.
12.GhafourianS,SadeghifardN,SoheiliS,SekawiZ.Extended
spectrumbeta-lactamases:definition,classificationand
epidemiology.CurrIssuesMolBiol.2014;17:11–22.
13.vonSalviatiC,LaubeH,GuerraB,RoeslerU,FrieseA.
EmissionofESBL/AmpC-producingEscherichiacolifrompig
fatteningfarmstosurroundingareas.VetMicrobiol.
2015;175:77–84.
14.HabeebMA,SarwarY,AliA,SalmanM,HaqueA.Rapid
emergenceofESBLproducersinE.colicausingurinaryand
woundinfectionsinPakistan.PakJMedSci.2013;29:
540–544.
15.SharmaM,PathakS,SrivastavaP.Prevalenceand
antibiogramofextendedspectrum-lactamase(ESBL)
producingGramnegativebacilliandfurthermolecular
characterizationofESBLproducingEscherichiacoliand
Klebsiellaspp.JClinDiagnRes.2013;7:2173–2177.
16.WHO.Integratedsurveillanceofantimicrobialresistance: guidancefromaWHOAdvisoryGroup;2013ISBN978924 1506311,Switzerland.
17.LaxminarayanR,DuseA,WattalC,etal.Antibiotic
resistance–theneedforglobalsolutions.LancetInfectDis.
2013;13:1057–1098.
18.CapitaR,Alonso-CallejaC.Antibiotic-resistantbacteria:a
challengeforthefoodindustry.CritRevFoodSci.
2013;53:11–48.
19.ArslanS,ÖzdemirF.Extendedspectrumbeta-lactamasesin
Escherichiacolistrainsisolatedfromhomemadewhite
cheeses:prevalenceandantibioticssusceptibility.WorldJ
MicrobiolBiotechnol.2008;24:2361–2364.
20.YıbarA,SoyutemizE.Antibioticsuseinfood-producing
animalsandpossibleresidualrisk.AtatürkÜniversitesiVetBil
Derg.2013;8:97–104.
21.GeserN,StephanR,HächlerH.Occurrenceand
characteristicsofextended-spectrum-lactamase(ESBL)
producingEnterobacteriaceaeinfoodproducinganimals,
mincedmeatandrawmilk.BMCVetRes.2013;8:21.
22.CLSI.Performancestandardsforantimicrobialsusceptibility
testing.Twenty-ThirdInformationalSupplement.CLSIDocument;
23.OjdanaD,SachaPB,WieczorekP,etal.Theoccurrenceof
blaCTX-M,blaSHV,andblaTEMgenesinextended-spectrum
-lactamase-positivestrainsofKlebsiellapneumoniae,
Escherichiacoli,andProteusmirabilisinPoland.IntJAntibiot.
2014;2014:935842.
24.WoodfordN,FaganEJ,EllingtonMJ.MultiplexPCRforrapid
detectionofgenesencodingCTX-Mextended-spectrum
b-lactamases.JAntimicrobChemother.2006;57:154–155.
25.HaqueA,YoshizumiA,SagaT,IshiiY,TatedaK.
ESBL-producingEnterobacteriaceaeinenvironmentalwater
inDhaka,Bangladesh.JInfectChemother.2014;20:735–737.
26.MitchellSM,SubbiahM,UllmanJL,FrearC,CallDR.
Evaluationof27differentbiocharsforpotential
sequestrationofantibioticresiduesinfoodanimal
productionenvironments.JEnvironChemEng.2015;3:162–169.
27.AllenHK,DonatoJ,WangHH,Cloud-HansenKA,DaviesJ,
HandelsmanJ.Callofthewild:antibioticresistancegenesin
naturalenvironments.NatRevMicrobiol.2010;8:251–259.
28.LupoA,Papp-WallaceKM,SendiP,BonomoRA,EndimianiA.
Non-phenotypicteststodetectandcharacterizeantibiotic
resistancemechanismsinEnterobacteriaceae.Diagn
MicrobiolInfectDis.2013;77:179–194.
29.StefaniS,GiovanelliI,AnacarsoI,etal.Prevalenceand
characterizationofextended-spectrum
-lactamase-producingEnterobacteriaceaein
food-producinganimalsinNorthernItaly.NewMicrobiol.
2014;37:551–555.
30.BonelliRR,MoreiraBM,PicãoRC.Antimicrobialresistance
amongEnterobacteriaceaeinSouthAmerica:history,
currentdisseminationstatusandassociatedsocioeconomic
factors.DrugResistUpdate.2014;17:24–36.
31.OverdevestI,WillemsenI,RijnsburgerM,etal.
Extended-spectrumbeta-lactamasegenesofEscherichiacoli
inchickenmeatandhumans,TheNetherlands.EmergInfect
Dis.2011;17:1216–1222.
32.DoyleMP,LoneraganGH,ScottHM,SingerRS.Antimicrobial
resistance:challengesandperspectives.ComprRevFoodSci
FoofSaf.2013;12:234–248.
33.Aidara-KaneA,AndremontA,CollignonP.Antimicrobial
resistanceinthefoodchainandtheAGISARinitiative.JInfect
PublicHealth.2013;6:162–165.
34.LahlaouiH,BenHajKhalifaA,BenMoussaM.Epidemiology
ofEnterobacteriaceaeproducingCTX-Mtypeextended
spectrum-lactamase(ESBL).MédMaladiesInfect.
2014;44:400–404.
35.RaoL,LvL,ZengZ,etal.Increasingprevalenceof
extended-spectrumcephalosporin-resistantEscherichiacoli
infoodanimalsandthediversityofCTX-Mgenotypes
during2003–2012.VetMicrobiol.2014;172:534–541.
36.SuY,YuCY,TsaiY,WangSH,LeeC,ChuC. Fluoroquinolone-resistantandextended-spectrum
-lactamase-producingEscherichiacolifromthemilkofcows withclinicalmastitisinSouthernTaiwan.JMicrobiolImmunol Infect.2014,http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmii.2014.10.003.
37.MelzeraM,PetersenI.Mortalityfollowingbacteraemic
infectioncausedbyextendedspectrumbeta-lactamase
(ESBL)producingE.colicomparedtonon-ESBLproducingE.
coli.JInfect.2007;55:254–259.
38.AmadorP,FernandesR,PrudêncioC,BritoL.Resistanceto
-lactamsinbacteriaisolatedfromdifferenttypesof
Portuguesecheese.IntJMolSci.2009;10:1538–1551.
39.Garcia-MiguraL,HendriksenRS,FraileL,AarestrupFM.
Antimicrobialresistanceofzoonoticandcommensal
bacteriainEurope:themissinglinkbetweenconsumption
andresistanceinveterinarymedicine.VetMicrobiol.
2014;170:1–9.
40.KarD,BandyopadhyayS,BhattacharyyaD,etal.Molecular
andphylogeneticcharacterizationofmultidrugresistant
extendedspectrumbeta-lactamaseproducingEscherichiacoli
isolatedfrompoultryandcattleinOdisha,India.InfectGenet
Evol.2015;29:82–90.
41.ZhengH,ZengZ,ChenS,etal.Prevalenceand
characterisationofCTX-M-lactamasesamongstEscherichia
coliisolatesfromhealthyfoodanimalsinChina.IntJ
AntimicrobAgents.2012;39:305–310.
42.SchwaigerK,HutherS,HölzelC,KämpfP,BauerJ.Prevalence
ofantibiotic-resistantEnterobacteriaceaeisolatedfrom
chickenandporkmeatpurchasedattheslaughterhouseand
atretailinBavaria,Germany.IntJFoodMicrobiol.
2012;154:206–211.
43.SmetA,MartelA,PersoonsD,etal.Diversityof
extended-spectrumbeta-lactamasesandclassC
beta-lactamasesamongcloacalEscherichiacoliisolatesin
Belgianbroilerfarms.AntimicrobAgentsChemother.
2008;52:1238–1243.
44.PetternelC,GallerH,ZarfelG,etal.Isolationand
characterizationofmultidrug-resistantbacteriafrom
mincedmeatinAustria.FoodMicrobiol.2014;44:41–46.
45.GarrecH,Drieux-RouzetL,GolmardJL,JarlierV,RobertJ.
Comparisonofninephenotypicmethodsfordetectionof
extended-spectrum-lactamaseProductionby
Enterobacteriaceae.JClinMicrobiol.2011;49:1048–1057.
46.PerezF,EndimianiA,HujerKM,BonomoRA.Thecontinuing
challengeofESBLs.CurrOpinPharmacol.2007;7:459–469.
47.NaasT,OxacelayC,NordmannP.Identificationof
CTX-M-Typeextended-spectrum--lactamasegenesusing
real-timePCRandpyrosequencing.AntimicrobAgents
Chemother.2007;51:223–230.
48.BradfordPA.Extended-spectrum-lactamasesinthe21st
century:characterization,epidemiology,anddetectionof
thisimportantresistancethreat.ClinMicrobiolRev.
2001;14:933–951.
49.SrisangkaewS,VorachitM.Theoptimumagentforscreening
andconfirmatorytestsforextended-spectrum
beta-lactamasesinEscherichiacoliandKlebsiellapneumoniae
inRamathibodiHospital,Thailand.JInfectDisAntimicrob
Agents.2004;21:1–5.
50.TanejaN,SharmaM.ESBLdetectioninclinicalmicrobiology:
why&how?IndianJMedRes.2008;127:297–300.
51.ThomsonKS.Extended-spectrum--lactamase,AmpC,and
carbapenemaseissues.JClinMicrobiol.2010;48:
1019–1025.
52.TurnerPJ.MYSTICEurope2007:activityofmeropenemand
otherbroad-spectrumagentsagainstnosocomialisolates.
DiagnMicrobiolInfectDis.2009;63:217–222.
53.KortenV,UlusoyS,ZarakoluP,MeteB,TurkishMYSTICStudy
Group.Antibioticresistancesurveillanceovera4-yearperiod
(2000–2003)inTurkey:resultsoftheMYSTICprogram.Diagn
MicrobiolInfectDis.2007;59:453–457.
54.Pérez-PérezFJ,HansonND.Detectionofplasmid-mediated
AmpCbeta-lactamasegenesinclinicalisolatesbyusing
multiplexPCR.JClinMicrobiol.2002;40:2153–2162.
55.KiratisinP,HenprasertA.Genotypicanalysisof
plasmid-mediatedbeta-lactamasesamongst
EnterobacteriaceaeotherthanEscherichiaspp.andKlebsiella
spp.thatarenon-susceptibletoabroad-spectrum
cephalosporin.IntJAntimicrobAgents.2010;36:343–347.
56.ThomsonKS.Controversiesaboutextended-spectrumand
AmpCbeta-lactamases.EmergInfectDis.2001;7:333–336.
57.JacobyGA.AmpCbeta-lactamases.ClinMicrobiolRev.
2009;22:161–182.
58.NazikH,BektoreB,OngenB,etal.Plasmid-mediated
quinoloneresistancegenesinEscherichiacoliurinaryisolates
fromtwoteachinghospitalsinTurkey:coexistenceofTEM,
SHV,CTX-MandVEB-1Type-lactamases.TropJPharmRes.
59.ZanianiFR,MeshkatZ,NasabMN,etal.Theprevalenceof
TEMandSHVgenesamongextended-spectrum
betalactamasesproducingEscherichiacoliandKlebsiella
pneumoniae.IranJBasicMedSci.2012;15:654–660.
60.FerreiraJC,FilhoRACP,AndradeLN,JuniorAB,DariniALC.
IncI1/ST113andIncI1/ST114conjugativeplasmidscarrying
blaCTX-M-8inEscherichiacoliisolatedfrompoultryinBrazil.
DiagnMicrobiolInfectDis.2014;80:304–306.
61.ChouchaniC,MarrakchiR,ElSalabiA.Evolutionof
-lactamsresistanceinGram-negativebacteriainTunisia.
CritRevMicrobiol.2011;37:167–177.
62.HiroiM,YamazakiF,HaradaT,etal.Prevalenceof
extended-spectrum-lactamase-producingEscherichiacoli
andKlebsiellapneumoniaeinfood-producinganimals.JVet
MedSci.2012;74:189–195.
63.KawamuraK,GotoK,NakaneK,ArakawaY.Molecular
epidemiologyofextended-spectrum-lactamasesand
Escherichiacoliisolatedfromretailfoodsincludingchicken
meatinJapan.FoodbornePathogDis.2014;11:104–110.
64.ReichF,AtanassovaV,KleinG.Extended-spectrum
-lactamase-andAmpC-producingenterobacteriain
healthybroilerchickens,Germany.EmergInfectDis.
2013;19:1253–1259.
65.ZarfelG,GallerH,LuxnerJ,etal.multiresistantbacteria
isolatedfromchickenmeatinAustria.IntJEnvironResPublic
Health.2014;11:12582–12593.
66.RandallL,HeinrichK,HortonR,etal.Detectionofantibiotic
residuesandassociationofcefquinomeresidueswiththe
occurrenceofextended-spectrum-Lactamase
(ESBL)-producingbacteriainwastemilksamplesfromdairy
farmsinEnglandandWalesin2011.ResVetSci.
2014;96:15–24.
67.KhoshbakhtR,ShahedA,AskiHS.Characterizationof
extendedspectrumB-lactamase-producingEscherichiaecoli
srainsisolatedfromdairyproducts.JMicrobiolBiotechnolFood
Sci.2014;3:333–336.
68.AhmedAM,ShimamotoT.Molecularanalysisofmultidrug
resistanceinShigatoxin-producingEscherichiacoliO157:H7
isolatedfrommeatanddairyproducts.IntJFoodMicrobiol.
2015;193:68–73.
69.GundoganN,YakarU.Siderophoreproduction,serum
resistance,hemolyticactivityandextendedspectrumbeta
lactamaseproducingKlebsiellaspeciesisolatedfrommilk
andmilkproducts.JFoodSaf.2007;3:251–260.
70.GundoganN,CıtakS,YalcinE.Virulencepropertiesof
extendedspectrumbeta-lactamase-producingKlebsiella
speciesinmeatsamples.JFoodProt.2011;74:
559–564.
71.GundoganN,AvciE.Prevalenceandantibioticresistanceof
extendedspectrumbeta-lactamase(ESBL)producing
EscherichiacoliandKlebsiellaspeciesisolatedfromfoodsof
animalorigininTurkey.AfrJMicrobiolRes.2013;7:4059–4064.
72.CantónR,González-AlbaJM,GalánJC.CTX-Menzymes:
originanddiffusion.FrontMicrobiol.2012;3:110.
73.PriyadharsiniRI,KavithaA,RajanR,MathaviS,RajeshKR.
PrevalenceofblaCTXMextendedspectrumbetalactamase
geneinEnterobacteriaceaefromcriticalcarepatients.JLab
Physicians.2011;3:80–83.
74.HawkeyPM.Multidrug-resistantGram-negativebacteria:a
productofglobalization.JHospInfect.2015;89:241–247.
75.RossoliniGM,D’AndreaMM,MugnaioliC.Thespreadof
CTX-M-typeextended-spectrum-lactamases.ClinMicrobiol
Infect.2008;14:33–41.
76.GonulluN,AktasZ,KayacanCB,etal.Disseminationof
CTX-M-15-lactamasegenescarriedonIncFIandFII
plasmidsamongclinicalisolatesofEscherichiacoliina
UniversityHospitalinIstanbul,Turkey.JClinMicrobiol.
2008;46:1110–1112.
77.VankerckhovenV,HuysG,VancanneytM,etal.Biosafety
assessmentofprobioticsusedforhumanconsumption:
recommendationsfromtheEU-PROSAFEProject.TrendsFood
SciTechnol.2008;19:102–114.
78.SharmaP,TomarSK,GoswamiP,SangwanV,SinghR.
Antibioticresistanceamongcommerciallyavailable