ContentslistsavailableatSciVerseScienceDirect
Resources,
Conservation
and
Recycling
j o u r n a l ho me p ag e :w w w . e l s e v i e r . c o m / l o c a t e / r e s c o n r e c
Review
Sustainable
airport
environments:
A
review
of
water
conservation
practices
in
airports
Isabella
de
Castro
Carvalho
∗,
Maria
Lúcia
Calijuri,
Paula
Peixoto
Assemany,
Marcos
Dornelas
Freitas
Machado
e
Silva,
Ronan
Fernandes
Moreira
Neto,
Aníbal
da
Fonseca
Santiago,
Mauro
Henrique
Batalha
de
Souza
FederalUniversityofVic¸osa,DepartmentofCivilEngineering,EnvironmentalResearchGroup,P.H.Rolfs,s/n,CampusUniversitário,Vic¸osa,MG36570-000,Brazil
a
r
t
i
c
l
e
i
n
f
o
Articlehistory:
Received30October2012
Receivedinrevisedform19February2013 Accepted20February2013
Keywords: Airport
Waterconsumption Efficientwateruse Rainwater Wastewaterreuse
a
b
s
t
r
a
c
t
Airportsconsumesignificantamountsofwatertomaintaintheirinfrastructure.Giventheincreasing worldwidedemandforthistypeoftransportandthecurrentsituationofwaterscarcityinmanyregions oftheplanet,effortsshouldbemadetoassesswaterconsumptionprofilesaswellasalternativesfor itsefficientuse.Inairportcomplexes,mostofthewaterisusedtomeetnon-potabledemands,making thempotentialenvironmentsforimplementingconservationpracticesaimedatreducingthesedemands –suchaswatermeteringandinstallationofwatersavingfixtures–andalsoforsearchingforalternative sources,suchasrainwaterandtreatedgreywaterordomesticsewageeffluent.Thisreviewpresents informationregardingwaterconsumptioningloballyimportantairportsinordertoprovideabasisfor studiesthatguidepoliciesanddecision-makingtowardasustainablemanagementoftheseenvironments duringtheplanningandexecutionofconstruction,expansionandmodernizationprojects.
© 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Contents
1. Introduction... 28
2. Waterconsumptioninlargeairports... 28
3. WaterconsumptioninBrazil... 30
4. Mainattitudesrelatedtotheefficientuseofwater:experienceofmajorairports... 31
4.1. Waterconsumptionmetering... 31
4.2. Watersavingsanitaryfixtures... 32
4.3. Waterreuse... 32
4.3.1. Rainwateruse... 32
4.3.2. Greywaterreuse... 33
4.3.3. Seawaterreuse ... 34
4.3.4. Sewageeffluentreuse... 34
4.4. Othermeasures... 34
4.4.1. Landscapemanagement... 34
4.4.2. Airconditioningsystems... 34
5. Finalconsiderations... 35
References ... 35
∗ Correspondingauthor.Tel.:+553138993098;fax:+553138993093.
E-mailaddresses:isakpi@yahoo.com.br,isaccarvalho@hotmail.com(I.C.Carvalho),calijuri@ufv.br(M.L.Calijuri),paulaassemany@hotmail.com(P.P.Assemany), marcosdornelases@yahoo.com.br(M.D.F.M.e.Silva),r9neto@yahoo.com.br(R.F.MoreiraNeto),anibalsantiago@gmail.com(A.F.Santiago),mauro.batalha@ufv.br (M.H.B.deSouza).
0921-3449/$–seefrontmatter © 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2013.02.016
1. Introduction
Thehighdemandfordrinkingwaterresultingfrompopulation increase,droughtsandunpredictableclimaticpatternsis becom-inganalarmingrealityinmanypartsoftheworld(Batesetal., 2008;WiekandLarson,2012).Increasingconcernsregardingthe consequencesofclimatechangealsoemphasizetheneedforwater resourcesmanagementplanninginordertoguaranteethatcurrent andfuturedemandswillbemettothedesiredlevelof satisfac-tion(BabelandShinde,2011;Iglesiasetal.,2011;Quevauviller, 2011;Schlüteret al.,2010).Withinthis context,theconceptof “waterconservation”involvesthecontrolledandefficientuseof thisresourceaswellasreusemeasures.Conservingwaterimplies actingin asystemic mannerin themanagementof supply and demand(Brooks,2006;HespanholandGonc¸alves,2004).
Urban water management efforts are usually focused on demand policiesthat tryto encourage the rational useof this resourceinordertoreducelossesand waste.Demand manage-mentisoneofthemostrelevantissuesworldwide(Arbuésetal., 2010;Fadlelmawla,2009;ZhongandMol,2010),focusingon reduc-ingconsumptionrelatedtowaterend-usesby,forinstance,using water-savingsanitary fixtures.Theobjectiveis tominimizethe needforwatersupplyandsewagetreatment,bothofwhichare associatedwithhighcostsandcanbeenvironmentallyandsocially detrimental(Willisetal.,2011).Supplymanagementisrelatedto thesearchforalternativewatersourcessuchasreuseofrainwater, wastewaterandgreywater,amongothers(GhisiandFerreira,2007; Hurlimann,2011;KahindaandTaigbenu,2011;Ryanetal.,2009). Airportsarepotentialenvironmentsforimplementingpolicies andtechnologiesaimedatconservingwaterbecauseoftheirlarge consumption,mostlyfornon-potablepurposessuchaswater cool-ingsystems,firecontrol,cleaningandwashingofvehicles,runways andaircrafts(MoreiraNetoetal.,2012).Worldwide,manyairports areemployinginitiativestopromotetheefficientuseofwater(ADR, 2009;FraportAG,2010;HKIA,2011;MAG,2007;NIAC,2011;SYD, 2009a,2009b).However,thosewhichimplementthisconceptmost stronglyareusuallythose thatarefacingwaterscarcity. Bolder alternatives,suchaswastewaterreuseandrainwaterusefortoilet flushing,bothofwhichneedgreaterinterventioninairport infra-structure,areusuallyimplementedonlyintheconstructionofnew terminalsorinscarcitysituations.
Themain purposesof this review aretocollectinformation regardingwater consumptionin airport complexesand present theconservationpracticesthat theycurrentlyadopt,aswellas informationpertinenttothefuturedevelopmentofpoliciesand programswhich aimatusingwaterrationallyinthese environ-ments.
2. Waterconsumptioninlargeairports
AccordingtotheAirportsCouncilInternational(ACI,2011),the numberof passengersregisteredin2010in 1318airportsfrom
157countriessurpassedthefivebillionmarkforthefirsttime,an increaseof6.6%comparedto2009.Globaldomestictrafficjumped by5.8%whileinternationaltrafficincreasedby7.7%.Aircargotraffic alsohitarecord:atotalof91milliontonswith15%growth com-paredto2009.Table1showsthenumberofpassengersbyregion in2010andthepercentageofvariationrelatedto2009.
Followingthetrendsbyregion,wecanobservethatthe emerg-ingmarketsledthegrowth.TheLatinAmerica-Caribbeanregion, supportedbysubstantialdevelopmentinBrazil,presentedwitha 13.2%increaseover2009.TheMiddleEastandAsia-Pacificregions alsopresentedsignificantgrowth.Thelowestpercentageswere observed for the mature marketsof North America (2.5%) and Europe(4.3%).
Thesefigureshighlighttheurgencyoffacingtheairportcapacity challenge.Airportoperatorsworldwidearefocusingontheneedto providethepassengerapositive,seamlesstravelexperience,andon planningnewcapacitytomeettheexpecteddoublingofpassengers inthenext15–20years.Morethanever,governmentsandairline partnerswillneedtoworkcloselywithairportstoensurethatthe requiredcapacityisaddedinasafe,secure,efficientandsustainable manner(ACI,2011).
Table2presents thepassengertraffic dataforthemain air-ports in the world, as well as the population equivalent (PE) fortheseenterprisesintermsofwaterconsumption.Datawere extractedfromtheannualreports providedbytheoperatorsof theseairportsand,inordertocalculatethePE,aconsumptionof 200L/(personday)andonlythetotalamountofpotablewaterused intheairportwereconsidered.
ThefirsttenairportslistedinTable2wereamongthe30largest intermsofpassengertrafficin2010(ACI,2011).Theotherairports alsohadsignificantpassengertrafficin2010but,mostimportantly, theyprovideannualdataregardingtheiroperationsaswellassocial andenvironmentalresponsibilityactions.
These airports,suchas theParis-CDG, presented, in2010, a waterconsumptionequivalenttothatofcitieswithapopulation of31thousandpeople,providinganexampleofthegreatamount ofwaternecessaryfortheseairportstomaintaintheiractivities. PassengertrafficintheAtlantaInternationalAirport,in2010, sur-passed89millionbuttheairportconsumedanamountofwater equivalenttoacityof13thousandpeople,possiblyasaresultof itsgreatereffortinrationalizingitsuseofwater.
Fig.1showstheannualwaterconsumptionofsomeofthemain airportsintheworld,aswellasthewaterconsumptionper passen-ger,calculatedbydividingthetotalpotablewaterconsumptionby thenumberofpassengerstransportedinthesameyear. Informa-tionregardingthenumberofpassengersandwaterconsumption wasobtainedfortheyear2010forallairports,exceptfor Fiumi-cinoinRome,whichpublisheditslatestenvironmentalreportin 2009.Theindex“L/passenger”wasusedinmany oftheairport annualreportsstudiedinordertoquicklyandsimplyorganizedata andenableconsumptiontobecomparedbetweenthem.However, itiswellknownthatwaterdemandisacomplexandnon-linear Table1
Airpassengerandaircargotrafficin2010. RegionsdefinedbyACI Noof
passengersa %ofchange comparedto2009 Total cargob %ofchange comparedto2009 Noof airports Africa 155,979,778 9.5 1,715,838 1.9 154 Asia-Pacific 1,294,834,546 11.3 31,856,866 18.5 172 Europe 1,466,758,533 4.3 17,920,309 15.5 454 LatinAmerica-Caribbean 403,676,303 13.2 4,665,694 14.3 263 Middle-East 206,622,059 12.0 5,881,214 13.7 53 NorthAmerica 1,509,836,075 2.5 28,709,087 13.2 222 ACI 5,037,707,294 6.6 90,749,008 15.3 1318
AdaptedfromACI(2011).
aTotalpassengers:totalpassengersenplanedanddeplaned,passengersintransitcountedonce. b Totalcargo:loadedandunloadedfreightandmailinmetrictons.
Table2
Passengertrafficinimportantairportsworldwideandpopulationequivalent(PE)oftheseenterprisesintermsofwaterconsumptionfor2010.
Airports Abr. Noofpassengers
(millions)
PE(thousand people)a
Reference
1 AtlantaInternationalAirport ATL 89.3 13.0 DOAAtlanta(2010)
2 London-HeathrowAirport LHR 65.9 25.4 LHR(2010)
3 Paris-CharlesdeGaulleAirport CDG 58.2 31.4 ADP(2010)
4 FrankfurtAirport FRA 53.0 12.4 FraportAG(2010)
5 Madrid-BarajasAirport MAD 49.8 15.8 MAD(2010)
6 AmsterdamAirport AMS 45.2 17.0 SchipholGroup(2011)
7 SanFranciscoAirport SFO 39.3 24.7 SFIA(2011)
8 Rome-FiumicinoAirport FCO 36.2 15.6 ADR(2009)
9 SydneyAirport SYD 36.0 14.2 SYD(2010)
10 MunichAirport MUC 34.7 13.1 MUC(2010)
11 NaritaAirport NRT 32.9 23.8 NIAC(2011)
12 TorontoAirport YYZ 31.8 12.7 GTAA(2010)
13 Paris-OrlyAirport ORY 25.2 6.55 ADP(2010)
14 ZurichAirport ZRH 22.9 7.27 ZIA(2010)
15 ManchesterAirport MAN 18.3 12.4 MAG(2011)
16 BrusselsAirport BRU 17.2 3.56 BAC(2010)
17 Portugal-LisbonAirport LIS 14.1 7.84 ANA(2010)
18 Portugal-PortoAirport OPO 5.27 1.25 ANA(2010)
aCalculatedusingtotalwaterconsumptionprovidedbytheairportsannualenvironmentalreportsfor2010,exceptforRome-Fiumicino,whichhadinformationonlyfor
2009.
functionofclimatic,institutionalandmanagementvariables(Babel andShinde,2011).Thisindexwillthereforebeusedinthisreview, butnotwithouttakingintoaccountthatitisnecessaryto iden-tifythevariablesinsideanairportenvironmentthathaveagreater influenceonwaterconsumptionbeforeanystatementcanbemade regardingtheeffortsofairportsinimplementingwater conserva-tionpractices.
Majordifferencescanbehighlightedbetweentheamountsof waterconsumedintheairportsshowninFig.1.Airportswithlarge passengertrafficnumbers,suchastheairportsofAtlanta,Frankfurt andMadrid,showlowerconsumptionthanthosewithasmaller numberof passengers,suchasNarita, Rome-Fiumicinoand San Franciscoairports.Thisshowsthattherelationshipbetweenwater consumptionandthenumberofpassengersisnotalwaysdirect and proportional.Atlanta,despitehavingthehighest passenger traffic,isnotthelargestwaterconsumer,withanindexofonly 11L/passenger.Thisairporthasintegratedactionsfortheefficient useofwaterintoitspractices,suchastheadequatemanagement ofvegetatedareas,useofwatersavingsanitaryfixturesand air-coolingsystemsthatdonotusewatercoolingtowers.Lisbonand Manchesterairportshave alowertotal waterconsumption, but haveindicesof43and50L/passenger,respectively.Theairports ofFrankfurt,MadridandAmsterdamhavegreatertotalwater con-sumptionandpassengertraffic,butpresentindicesofonly22,24 and27L/passenger.FrankfurtandAmsterdamuserainwaterand
watersavingsanitaryfixtures,whereastheactionsofLisbonand Manchester towardtherationaluseof water arestill incipient. MadridAirport,however,despiteitslowconsumptionindex,has notimplementedanysignificantactionstoreduceconsumption, nordoesitusealternativewatersources,whichprovidesanother exampleofthefactthattheindex“L/passenger”doesnot necessar-ilyreflectconservationactionsorthebestmanagementofwater resourcesinaspecificairport.
Fig.2showssomeofthemainwatersourcesusedinairportsthat haveadoptedconservationpracticesandthatpresenttheresultsof theseinitiativesintheirannualreports.
AirportssuchasFiumicino,SydneyandFrankfurtare promi-nent because of the volume of recycled water they use, as is Naritaforitsuseofgreywater.However,mostairportshavenot integrated theimplementationofconservation measures.Some airportsacttoreducedemandmainlythroughthemanagement andmonitoringofconsumption,whereasothersfocustheiractions onthesearchforalternativewatersourcesinresponseto increas-ingdemands.Theobjectiveshouldbetointegratesuchmeasures givenwateravailabilitywillnotkeeppacewithairportexpansion ortheexpectedgrowthoverthenextyears.Itisalsoimportantto highlightthatmanycountrieshaveconsideredmethodologiesfor introducingtariffsforwater,previouslyconsideredafreeresource (Fadlelmawla,2009;Zhongand Mol,2010).AccordingtoZhong andMol(2010),waterpricingsystemssuchasthesehavemany
Fig.2. Watersourcesinairports.
objectives:tocoverincreasingcosts,protectscarceresourcesand introduceaneconomicmotivationforpromotingtheefficientuseof water.Airportsshouldadoptsuchreformsandconsiderwater con-servationmeasuresnotonlyasenvironmentallyresponsiblebut alsoasaneconomicadvantage.
3. WaterconsumptioninBrazil
According to the Brazilian Airport Infrastructure Enterprise (Infraero)10 ofthemostimportantairportsinBrazilaccounted for67%oftheairpassengertrafficin2010.Together,theseairports consumedover3.5millioncubicmetersofwater,whichequals73% ofthetotalconsumption registeredforthe66Brazilianairports underInfraero’sadministration.
Figs.3and4showthatitisnotpossibletoconsidertheretobe anexplicitrelationshipbetweenthenumberofpassengers trans-portedandthewaterconsumptionineachrespectiveairport,either inBrazilorforinternationalairports.
Fig.3shows,forinstance,thatGaleãoAirport(GIG)represents 25%ofthetotalwaterconsumptionbutoccupiesfourthposition intermsofthenumberofpassengerstransported.AsforConfins Airport(CNF),theconsumptionof4.5%issimilartothatforthe airportsofBrasília(BSB)andCongonhas(CGH),at4.2and3.3%, respectively;however,thepassengermovementatConfinsin2010 washalfofthatoftheothertwoairports.
Fig.4showswaterconsumptionandtheindexoflitersper pas-sengerforthesame10airports.Ithighlightsthattheairportwith thegreatestpassengermovementdoesnotalwaysalsohavethe
largestconsumption.Inotherwords,fortheBrazilianaswellasfor theinternationalscenario,relatingwaterconsumptiontothe num-berofpassengerstransportedisnotasufficientmeasuretoassess theefficiencyofthewaterresourcemanagementmodelsusedbyan airport.Asmentionedearlierinthissection,Galeãooccupiesfourth positionintermsofnumberofpassengersbuthasthehighestvalue forL/passenger,immediatelyfollowedbyGuarulhosAirport(GRU). However,despitethesehighindices comparedtootherairports withsimilarlargepassengerthroughput,Galeãohasalready signif-icantlyreduceditswaterconsumptionafterimplementingsystems forreusingsewageeffluentandusingrainwatertomeetthewater demandsoftheairconditioningsystem.In2001,thisairport con-sumedabout150,000m3ofwaterpermonth.In2010,despitethe
increaseof106%inthenumberofpassengerscomparedto2001, themonthlywaterconsumptionhadreducedto99,200m3.
It isimportant tohighlightthat ahighindex ofL/passenger doesnotimplicatetheretobebadorinefficientmanagementof waterresources,becauseothercharacteristicsintrinsictoairport environments,suchascategory(internationalordomesticflights), numberofflightsandamountofcargotransported,amongothers, influencethepatternofwaterconsumptionandarenotrevealed fromtherelationshipbetweenconsumption andthenumberof passengers.However,thisrelationshipcanbeusedasaninitialstep inidentifyingexcessiveconsumptionandwherewater conserva-tionmeasuresarenecessary.
Airports witha similar annual passenger movement, in the rangeoffivetosixmillionpassengersperyear,suchastheairports ofPortoAlegre(POA),Salvador(SSA),Fortaleza(FOR)andRecife
Fig.4.Totalwaterconsumptionandconsumptionperpassengerinthe10Brazilianairportswithgreatestpassengertraffic.
(REC),present indices of 23,23, 29 and24L/passenger, respec-tively.However,ManausAirport(MAO)transportedtwomillion passengersin2010andhadanindexof82L/passenger.
Fig.5presentspassengertrafficandtheL/passengerindexfor themaininternationalairportsandforBrazilianairportswithlarge passengermovement.
RomeAirportpossessesanaverageconsumptionindexandis notableforthelargeamountofwateritrecycles(approximately 1700,000m3in2010,accordingtoADR,2009),asshowninFig.2.
InBrazil,GaleãoAirportpresentsa highconsumptionindexbut istheonlyoneinthecountrywhichimplementssewageeffluent reuseandrainwateruse.
Thus,wehighlightthenecessityofstudyingwaterconsumption inairportenvironments,takingintoaccountthesepeculiaritiesin ordertoobtaininformationthatisrelatedtosuchconsumption,so astoguideactionsrelatingtowaterresourceaswellaspoliciesthat promoteitspreservation,rationaluseandthesearchfor alterna-tivesources.InBrazil,suchstudieshaveanevengreaterurgency, becausemostairportsareundergoingrenovationsandare expand-ingtoaccommodatetwoimportantinternationalsportingevents, theFIFAWorldCupin2014andtheOlympicGamesin2016.
4. Mainattitudesrelatedtotheefficientuseofwater: experienceofmajorairports
Asmentioned inSections3 and 4,airports withalarge cir-culationofpeoplehaveimplementedactionsaimedatachieving
theefficientuseofwaterresources.Inthefollowingsectionswe presentthemostrelevantactionstheseairportshavecarriedout.
4.1. Waterconsumptionmetering
Aprogramfortherationaluseofwaterbeginswithasystematic evaluationoftheactivitiesandsectorsinwhichwaterisused.Any suchevaluationmustbecontinuousifthecontrolofwater con-sumptionthatisnecessaryfortheidentificationofleaksandlosses istobeachieved.Watermeteringacrosstheentiredistributionnet isessentialandanimportantstageofthisanalysis.
Concerns regarding control of water useare experienced in manyairports.AtTorontoPearsonInternationalAirport,baseline datahasbeencollectedandindividualmetersinstalledforallfood andbeveragefranchisesinordertoreducetheamountofpotable waterusedattheairport(GTAA,2006).
Initiatives such as leak control and monitoring of demand are also widelyemployed. Actions toreduce water use and to requirebestpracticesregardingwater efficiencymeasureshave beenadoptedatSydneyAirport.Amongtheseinitiatives,a com-pleteleakdetectionprogramandasophisticatedreal-timewater demandmonitoringsystemhavebeendeveloped(SYD,2009a).A monitoringprogramforwateruseandforregularlycheckingfor leakshasbeeninstigatedatLondonHeathrowInternational Air-port(LHR,2010).Thereisalsoanongoingleakdetectionprogram atManchesterAirporttoensureanyleaksarequicklydetectedand repaired(MAG,2007).
AtParis Airports, meshed distribution networks of drinking wateraremonitoredconstantly,andoperatingdataaredelivered toaninformationtechnologycenterusingfiber-opticcables.Alerts areroutedautomaticallytoanemergencyphonethatenablesa rapidreactionintheeventofaleak,andwaterqualityisconstantly controlled(ADP,2010).
ConfinsAirport,theseventhlargestairportinBrazilwith pas-senger traffic of 7.1 million in 2010, is implementing a model consumptionmanagementsystemthathasbeenoperationalsince theendof2012.Theconsumptionof48meteringpointswillbe monitoredcontinuously and a software using data from these pointswillmakeitpossibletoassessifconsumptionisasexpected andtoidentifyabnormalpatternsandleaks.Areportisgenerated withaconsumptiondiagnosis,makingiteasiertoadoptspecific policiesandmeasurestoreduceconsumption.
4.2. Watersavingsanitaryfixtures
Majorairports have adoptedprograms toreplacetheir con-ventionalsanitaryfixturesbywatersavingequipmentandhave achievedsignificantreductionsinwaterconsumption.Atlanta Air-portreplaced,in 2007,630toiletsthatused 6.05Lper flushby newonesthatused4.84L.Additionally,around1200urinalsthat used3.8Lperflushwerereplacedbyonesusing1.9L(DOAAtlanta, 2009).
FortLauderdaleHollywoodInternationalAirport(Florida,EUA) had21,876,444passengersin2010(BCAD,2010).Accordingtothe CDA(2010),thisairportconsumedapproximately246,000m3 of
waterfromOctober2005toSeptember2006.Theinstallationof watersavingsanitaryfixturesinthebathroomscost$234,000,00 andsaved163,000m3ofpotablewaterafteroneyear,representing
savingsof$281,000.00andareturnontheinvestmentwithin10 months.
InFrankfurtAirport,theuseofflowlimitationequipmenton faucetshashelpedtosavethousandsofcubicmetersofwaterevery year,andtheinstallationofwaterlessurinalshassaved approx-imately 4.2million litersof drinkingwater each year.The cost savingsamounttoapproximatelyD33,000eachyear(FraportAG, 2011).
DubaiInternationalAirporthasinstalledsensor-operatedwash basinfaucetsinalltoiletsand,althoughnogreywatersystemsare used,theyhavebeeninstalledand somearehalf-flushsystems. Inaddition,astandardautomatic1.6IGflushhasbeeninstalledin thebathrooms,ashasadualflushingmechanism3.0/6.0Ltoreduce waterwastagethroughmanualflushingfromtoilets(DCADubai, 2004).
Otherimportant airports,suchasAmsterdam,SãoFrancisco, Fiumicino, Sydney, Toronto, Narita, Manchester and London-Heathrow,havehadequipmentinstalledinordertosave water andencouragewaterconservation.Tapswithwatersavingnozzles (aerators)thatareabletooptimizetheflushingprocess,low-flow restroomfixtures,automatic-shutoffvalves,automaticballcocks andurinalsareverycommonintoiletareasandarearequirement inthedesignofanynewbuildingsattheseairports(ADR,2009; LHR,2010;MAG,2007;NIAC,2011;SchipholGroup,2011;SFIA, 2011;SYD,2009a;GTAA,2006).
Theairports of Recifeand Galeãostand outin the Brazilian context.InRecife,toiletshavebeeninstalledusingatechnology similartothatemployedinaircraftinwhichflushingisoperated undervacuum,significantlyreducingwaterconsumption.The vac-uumsystemreducestotalconsumptionattheairportby30%.The estimatedmonthlyconsumptionis21,400m3,muchlessthanthe
30,600m3thatwouldbeusedbyaconventionalsystem.Thelatter
consumesanaverageof10Lperflushwhereastheconsumption ofthevacuumsystemcorrespondsto1.2Lperflush(Infraero, per-sonalcommunication).Manyactionshavebeenimplementedat
Galeãotoimprove itswater managementsystem,includingthe replacementofthewatermains,networksanddistributionlines thatcreatedahighriskofleaks,aswellasthesubstitutionofflow controlvalvesandtheinstallationoffloatswitches inthe stor-agecenters.Storageunitsand pumpingstations withstructural problemswererenovated(PizzatoandAlves,2010).However,even thoughgreateffortshavebeenmade,thereisstillmuchto accom-plishinthisairportbecauseitpresentshighconsumptionindicesin comparisontointernationalairportsofthesamesize,asdiscussed inSection3.
4.3. Waterreuse
Waterreusemeasuresareusuallymotivatedbyscarcity,and alsobyincreasinglystringentenvironmentalrestrictions.Thenew technologiesdevelopedforwastewater treatmentenablereuse; however,itseffectiveusedependslargelyontheeconomic advan-tagesthatwillberealizedaswaterpricesincrease(Casanietal., 2005).
Itisdifficulttomeasuretherealeconomicvalueofwaterreuse becausethebenefitsareembeddedinprotectionofsurfacewater resources,localeconomicdevelopment,publichealthprotection andmaintainingcurrent watersources forlonger,amongother aspects (Anderson, 2003). Economic costs cannot be evaluated withoutalsoconsideringsocialandenvironmentalcostsand bene-fits.Waterreuseisnotonlyanenvironmentallycorrectalternative butalsoarationalandsmartwayofusingrawmaterial.
Theachievementofgoodresultsdependsonthecommitment of professionals who have been trained to develop and adopt adequateconceptsand technologiesfor efficienttreatmentand environmentalsustainability.AccordingtoUrkiagaetal.(2008), howeverreuseisemployeditiscriticaltoobservethebasic prin-ciplesthatshouldguidesuchpractice:thepreservationofusers’ heath,consistentcompliancewithqualityrequirementsrelatedto theintendeduseand protectionofthematerialandequipment incorporatedintoreusesystems,aswellastheiroperationalcosts. Airportspresentlimitationsandpotentialities,aswellasother industrialtypologies.Theairlinesof190MemberStatesofthe Inter-nationalCivilAviationOrganization(ICAO)carriedapproximately 2.5billionpassengersin2010,showinganincreaseofabout8.7% over2009(ICAO,2010).AccordingtotheWorldHealth Organiza-tion(WHO,2009),thisindicatesthereisapotentialforcommercial airtransporttospreadcommunicablediseases.Thus,the imple-mentationofwaterreuseinairportsshouldbestrictlymonitored inordertominimizetheassociatedrisks.
FrankfurtAirporthassince2001maintaineditspotablewater volumeatthesamelevel,despiteincreasingpassengernumbers. Theconceptbehindthepotablewatersupplyintheairportarea is thatpotable water consumption shouldbereduced byusing servicewaterinstead.Theservicewatershareinthetotalwater consumptionhasrisento18%overthepasttenyears.Inthesame period,potablewaterconsumptionpertrafficunithasdeclinedby over20%.In2010,potablewaterconsumptionwas1.46millionm3,
whichequatesto19litersperpassenger;theservicewatervolume amountedto319,000m3(FraportAG,2010).FiumicinoAirportalso
reuseswaterandconsumesmorereusewaterthanpotablewater. Fig.6showsthehistoryofpotableandreusewaterconsumptionin ordertocompareFiumicinoandFrankfurtairports.
Experienceswithrationaluseofwaterinairports,suchasusing rainwater,greywater,seawaterandreusingwastewaterare pre-sentedinSections4.3.1–4.3.4.
4.3.1. Rainwateruse
Rainwaterharvestingisatechniqueadoptedgloballyandwhich isbecomingincreasinglyusefulinthecurrentcontextofthe qual-itativeandquantitativescarcityofwaterresources.Rainwatercan
Fig.6.AnnualpotablewaterconsumptionandreusewaterintheairportsofFiumicinoandFrankfurt(ADR,2009andFraportAG,2010).
beusedindomestic,industrialandagriculturalactivities,among others,providingasignificantreductionincostsbyusinga non-traditionalwatersource(AladenolaandAdeboye,2010).
Airportenvironments,becauseofimpermeabilizationofthesoil, containalargeamountofsuperficiallydrainedwater,which rep-resents great potential for storageduring therainy period and usefornon-potable activities.Thispotential,however, depends ontheregionwheretheairportislocatedandonthe technolo-gies available for treating this water. Deicing salt applications arecommonincoldclimateregionsand,accordingtoDaietal. (2012),thesechemicalshavenegativeeffectsontheenvironment (surfacewater,groundwater,plantsandanimals)thatshouldbe takenintoaccountwhenselectingarainwatertreatment technol-ogy.Additionally,eliminatingpollutantsfromroadsandrunways canbe veryexpensive; a comprehensivestudyof theavailable technologies and their economic feasibility must therefore be undertaken.
FraportAGoperatestworainwatertreatmentfacilities,located inCargoCitySouthandatTerminal2atFrankfurtInternational Airport.Attimesoflowrainfall,treatedwaterfromtheRiverMain isfedintothesystem.Thisservicewaterisfedviaseparate sup-plynetworkstosprinklersystems,toiletcisternsandsystemsfor wateringlandscapedareas.InCargoCitySouth,theservicewater issuppliedthroughout,andtheterminalsarealsosuppliedwith servicewater.Thesamesystemisstillundergoingfurther expan-sioninTerminal1and neighboringoffice buildings.FraportAG operatesastormwaternetworkwithalengthofapproximately 200km,23rainwatercontainmentbasinswithastoragevolumeof 100,000m3and47lightliquidseparators(FraportAG,2010).
OrlyandCharlesdeGaulleAirportsinParishave,since1996 and1999,respectively,beenequippedwitharainwatertreatment plant.In2005,theconstructioncostOrlyD740,000andCharles deGaulleD900,000.AtOrly,rainwaterisusedtosupplytheair conditioningsystemandheatingnetwork,andasmallpartisused forfirecontrol,saving70,000m3/yearofpotablewater(ADP,2010).
The Maintenance Division of the Department of Aviation in AtlantaAirporthasinstalledthree11.37m3watercisterns,which
capturewaterrunofffromtheroof.Thewatercollectedfromthe cisternsisusedtoirrigatethexeriscapedaswellasotherareas. During thehottermonths (Mayuntil August),theMaintenance Divisionusesapproximately36.37m3ofharvestedrainwaterper
month(DOAAtlanta,2009).
InNarita,rainwatertreatmentfacilitiesproducegreywaterfrom rainwaterthatispumpedupfromtheholdingpondsforuseas chil-lingwaterandauxiliarysuppliestothecentralheatingandcooling plants.Theairportalsobegantouserecycledwaterforflushingin thepassengerterminaltoiletsinApril2010(NIAC,2011).
SomebuildingsatBrusselsInternationalAirportarefittedwith sixrainwatercollectors,eachof10m3.Therainwaterisusedfor
flushingtoiletsandcleaningpurposes(BAC,2010).
AccordingtotheSchipholGroup,theAmsterdamAirport col-lectsrainanddrainwaterforreuseasrinsewater(SchipholGroup, 2011).
HeathrowandZurichAirportscollect59and10thousandm3,
respectively,ofrainwatereachyear.Arainwaterharvestingscheme atLondon-HeathrowAirporthasthepotentialtoreusearound85% oftherainfallwhich,togetherwiththeuseofboreholewater, pro-videsTerminal5with70%ofitsnon-potable waterneeds. This rainwaterharvestingschemeisthebiggestofitskindinEurope (LHR, 2010).Zurich Airport uses rainwater to supply technical installationsandalsofortoiletflushing(ZIA,2010).AtManchester Airport, there is a current review of opportunities for harvest-ingrainwaterfromroofsandhardsurfacesfornon-potableuses, includinguseinroadsweepersandforfiretraining(MAG,2007).
Rainwaterisoneof thealternativewater suppliesemployed at Galeão Airport. In 2009, thecompany responsible for water resourcesmanagementintheairportimplementedrainwater har-vestingfromtherooftops.The1500m3 collectedeverymonthis
treatedand combinedwithtreatedsewageeffluentforreusein coolingsystems(PizzatoandAlves,2010).
4.3.2. Greywaterreuse
Greywaterconsists of the effluentfrom lavatories, showers, kitchensinksandwashingmachines(HernándezLealetal.,2011; Liuetal.,2010;OttosonandStenstrom,2003)anddoesnotreceive anycontributionfromsewage.Thisis relatedtotheconceptof effluentsegregationatsource,whichmakestreatmentandreuse easier.Effluent suchasthis presentsa lower pollutant concen-trationincomparisonwithdomesticsewageandonlyrepresents asmallfractionoftheeffluentgeneratedinabuilding;itisone ofthemainalternativesforreducingpotablewaterconsumption (GilboaandFriedler,2008).Lietal.(2009)reviewsomegreywater treatmenttechnologies,includingphysical,chemicalandbiological processes,whichareusuallyprecededbyasolid–liquidseparation step(septictank,filterbags,screenandfilters)asapre-treatment, followedbyadisinfectionstepaspost-treatment.Accordingtothe authors,thephysicalprocessesalonearenotsufficienttoguarantee anadequatereductionintheorganics,nutrientsandsurfactants. Chemicalprocessescanhoweverefficientlyremovethesuspended solids,organicmaterialsandsurfactantsinlowstrength greywa-ter.Thecombinationofaerobicbiologicalprocesseswithphysical filtrationanddisinfectionisconsideredtobethemosteconomical andfeasiblesolutionforgreywaterrecycling.HernándezLealetal. (2011)statethatanaerobicmethodsareaninterestingalternative,
giventhelowcostandpotentialforenergyproduction.Theauthors highlighttheapplicabilityofsuchsystemstogreywatertreatment, sincethelownutrientlevelscanlimittheefficiencyofsomeaerobic systems.
Oftheairportswhichusegreywaterasanalternativesourceof water,wecanhighlighttheairportsofHongKonginChina,Narita inJapanandFiumicinoinItaly.HongKongAirporthasatreatment systemthattreatsgreywatercollectedfromaircraftcatering facili-tiesandterminalbuildingkitchenstogetherwithwaterrunofffrom aircraftwashingactivities.Treatedwaterisre-usedforirrigation. In2010thetreatmentplantprocessed1.4millionm3ofgreywater,
meetingalloftheairport’slandscapeirrigationneeds.Inthenear future,theairportplanstoinstallanewmembranebiological reac-torintheplanttoenhancethequalityofthetreatedwater(HKIA, 2011).
Greywaterfromthepassengerterminal restaurantsofNarita Airportistreatedatthekitchenwastewatertreatmentfacilityand isusedasflushingwaterinthepassengerterminaltoilets(NIAC, 2011).
AtFiumicinoAirportinRome,greywaterderivedfromTerminal restaurantsandfromthecompanyresponsibleforpreparingthe foodservedintheaircraftiscollectedand,afterphysicalprocesses toseparateoutthegrease,istreatedtogetherwithdomesticsewage usinganactivatedsludgebiologicalsystemforreuseinnon-potable activities(ADR,2009).
4.3.3. Seawaterreuse
Afurtheralternativesourceissalinewater.Althoughitisrichin substancesthatarenotdesirableforreusepurposes,suchassodium chloride,thiswaterhasbecomeattractivetoairportssituatednear thecoast,afterpropertreatment.
Seawater supplies 41% of the water demand of Hong Kong Airport,representing approximately380,000m3/d.A smallpart
(300m3/d)isusedforaircraftlavatorywaste,about7300m3/dis
usedfortoiletflushingandtherestisusedinthecoolingsystem. Thesavingsgeneratedbytheintroductionoftheseawatersupply is$500,000/year(HKIA,2011).
4.3.4. Sewageeffluentreuse
Wastewaterandsewageeffluentreusehaverecentlybeen con-sideredas potentialoptionstomanage increasingwater stress. Optionsforreusedependonthequalityoftheeffluentproduced after sewage treatment (Megdal, 2006). Reclaimed water from domesticsewageisusedfrequentlyinmanyapplicationssuchas irrigation,toiletflushing,cleaning,industrialreuseand environ-mentalenhancement(Changetal.,2007;Chiouetal.,2007;Jimenez andChavez,2003;Jimenezetal.,2001).Becauseofthepotentialrisk tohealthduetothepresenceofpathogenicmicroorganisms,reuse oftreated sewage needscarefulevaluation (JamwalandMittal, 2010)andishighlydependentonthetreatmenttechnologyused.
Currently, there is a global increase in thereuse of treated domesticsewage,mostlyincountriesfacingwatershortagesand thathaveimplementedanexpensivepotablewaterusefee. Fol-lowingthisglobaltrend,airportsareincreasinglyadoptingsimilar practices.AtFiumicino,sanitary,kitchenandrestauranteffluent aretreatedbyactivatedsludgeandultravioletdisinfectionbefore beingreusedinlandscapeirrigation,airconditioningsystemsand firecontrol(ADR,2009).
QingdaoAirportinChina,which transported8.2million pas-sengersin2008,usesmembranebioreactorstotreatitseffluent. AccordingtoLiuetal.(2007),thesystemcost$800,000,hasthe capacitytotreat1000m3/dandoccupiesanareaof10,000m2.The
treatedeffluentisreusedinthemaintenanceoftheairport com-plex:30%forafforestation,40%forirrigationofgreenareas,20%for thefirecontrolsystemand10%isdischarged.
DubaiAirport hasan online oil-water separator systemand awastewatertreatmentplant,operated bya technicianonsite. Therecycledwateris usedfor washingvehiclesand withinthe engineering works. All the vehicles operated by the Engineer-ing Services Division are cleaned using recycled water and all drainagere-entersthewastewatertreatmentplant.Thisplant cur-rentlytreats80m3ofsewageonadailybasis.TheDepartmentof
CivilAviationofDubai,which islocatedintheairportcomplex, hasinvestigatedtheconsumptionratesforirrigation,findingthat 960,000m3/monthofwaterisusedforirrigationin85,000m2
land-scapingprojects.Inordertominimizetheseconsumptionrates,the airportimplementedsewageeffluentuseforirrigation(DCADubai, 2004).
TheactualwatersavingsmadebyKingsfordSmithAirport,in Sydney,Australia,fluctuateaccordingtodemandand,in2009,the watertreatmentplantsavedanaverageof350m3offreshpotable
watereach day.In2010and2011,thisincreasedtoanaverage of580m3 perdayandisexpectedtoincreaseuptoamaximum
of1000m3perdayoverthenext20years.Thewatertreatment
plantprocessesrawsewagefromtheInternationalTerminaland itssurroundings,includingthemulti-storycarpark,UlmBuilding (SydneyAirport’sCorporateOffice)andtheCustomsHouse.The treatmentplantproducestwostreamsofrecycledwater.One com-prisesrecycledwaterthatispipedtotheInternationalTerminalto beusedfortoiletflushing.Thereare526toiletsand212urinals con-nectedtothissystem,thatwillallbeflushedusingrecycledwater. Theotherstreamcomprisesreverseosmosiswaterthatispipedto theCentralServicesBuildingandusedinair-conditioningcooling towers(SYD,2009b).
InBrazil,Galeãohasasewageeffluentreusesystem.Theeffluent ismixedwith8m3h−1ofrainwaterorwithwellwaterinorder
toachievethemaximumproductionefficiencyforreuse,whichis 20m3h−1.Themixtureispre-treatedbycoagulation,filtrationin
sandfilters,filtrationwithactivatedcarbonandthenseparatedby membranes(reverseosmosis),whichresultsinanexcellentwater qualitysuitableforsupplyingthecoolingtowerswithallnecessary securityrequirements(PizzatoandAlves,2010).
4.4. Othermeasures
4.4.1. Landscapemanagement
Airportcomplexesusuallyhavelargelandscapedareasthatplay anestheticroleaswellasprotectsoilandminimizethecarriageof sedimentsintodrainagechannels.Maintainingareassuchasthese usewater,sotheirmanagementmustbebasedonthepremiseof theefficientuseofthisresource.
AtlantaAirporthasarigorousplanningprogramfortheir land-scapedareas,named“XeriscapeLandscaping”.Theplantsmeetthe requirementsforlowwaterdemand(xerophilousplantsareusually selected).Areaswherelandscapeisparticularlyimportant esthet-icallyareprioritized(DOAAtlanta,2009).AccordingtotheCDA (2010),thechoiceofspeciesshouldbeofthosewiththelowest growthrate,whichtoleratedroughtsandwhichdonotattractbirds orotheranimals.
4.4.2. Airconditioningsystems
Air cooling systems ensure the comfort of passengers and employeesbutconsumelargeamountsofwater.Theuseofrecycled waterinsuchsystems,ormoreefficientheatexchangers,is essen-tialifwaterconsumptioninairportsistobereduced.
At Atlanta Airport, after steam-powered refrigerators were replacedbyelectricchillers,theneedforwatertogeneratesteam waseliminated,andwaterconsumptionintheboilerswas there-forereduced(DOAAtlanta,2009).
AwatertreatmentsystemwasinstalledinAmsterdam Inter-nationalAirportforsupplyingwatertothecoolingtowersonthe
roofsofTerminals2and3in2010.Thepurposewastoreducethe mineralcontentofthecoolingwaterandachieveasavingofupto 20%ofthewatersupply(SchipholGroup,2011.
5. Finalconsiderations
Themostrelevantinformationpresentedinthispaperis: -Waterconsumptioninairportshasbeenassessedandcompared
intermsofpassengertrafficandtheindexofL/passenger,whichis widelyusedinairportannualreports.Thisstudyemphasizesthat inmanysituationssuchanindexdoesnothaveadirectinfluence onconsumption.Othervariablespertainingtoairportactivities shouldbestudiedinordertodetermineamoreaccurateindex toassess,compareandevenpredictwaterconsumptioninsuch environments.
-Airportenvironmentsconsumelargeamountsofwaterto main-taininfrastructureandoperationsand,inmostcases,thisvolume isusedtomeetnon-potabledemands,suchasfirecontrol, wash-ingoffloorsandaircraft,landscapeirrigationandairconditioning systems,whichcanbemettoalargeextentbyalternativewater sources(rainwaterandtreatedeffluent,forinstance).
-These environments have extensive impermeable areas (run-waysandrooftops)thatcanbeusedtoharvestlargevolumes ofrainwater.Manyairportsoperationsdonottakeadvantageof therainwateravailablefromrunwaysandpavedareas,which isalreadycollectedandtreatedtoavoidcontaminationofwater bodiesbyoilandgrease.Itisimportanttohighlight,however,that thispotentialshouldbeassessedinthecontextoftheeconomic feasibilityofthecurrenttechnologiesavailableforremoving pol-lutantsfromsuchareas.
-Someairportshaveahighproductionofwastewater,whichcould makefeasibletheimplementationofreusingsewageeffluentas wellasgreywater,aftertreatment.Examplesofairportsthatare alreadyimplementingreuseprovethatthispracticeistechnically andeconomicallyfeasible,aswellasproviding environmental gainsassociatedwithsavingpotablewater.
-Increasesinairportcapacityandchangesininfrastructureshould befollowedbytheinstallationofwatersavingsanitaryfixtures andamodernandefficientsystemforwatermetering,aimedat monitoringconsumptionanddevelopingpoliciesforits reduc-tion.
References
ACI Airports Council International. Annual traffic data 2010 – passengers; 2011. Available from: http://www.aci.aero/cda/acicommon/display/main/ acicontent07c.jsp?zn=aci&cp=1-5-54-556662[accessed20.02.12]. ADPAéroportsdeParis.Corporatesocialresponsibilityreport;2010.Availablefrom:
http://services.aeroportsdeparis.fr/ADP.DownLoadManager/getFile.aspx? ideFile=64[accessed20.02.12].
ADR Aeroportidi Roma.Environmental report; 2009. Available from:http:// www.adr.it/c/documentlibrary/get file?uuid=e60b5298-f5ac-415c-80aa-62abfe6c4b46&groupId=17615[accessed20.02.12].
AladenolaOO,AdeboyeOB.Assessingthepotentialforrainwaterharvesting.Water ResourcesManagement2010;24(10):2129–37.
ANAAeroportosdePortugal.Relatóriodesustentabilidade;2010.Availablefrom: http://www.bcsdportugal.org/ana—aeroportos-de-portugal-2010/1766.htm [accessed20.02.12].
AndersonJ.Theenvironmentalbenefitsofwaterrecyclingandreuse.WaterSupply 2003;3(4):1–10.
Arbués F, García-Vali ˜nas MA, Villanúa I. Urban water demand for service and industrial use: the caseof Zaragoza. WaterResources Management 2010;24(14):4033–48.
BabelMS,ShindeVR.Identifyingprominentexplanatoryvariablesforwaterdemand predictionusingartificialneuralnetworks:acasestudyofBangkok.Water ResourcesManagement2011;25(6):1653–76.
BAC BrusselsAirport Company. Environmental report; 2010. Available from: http://www.brusselsairport.be/en/cf/res/pdf/env/en/envreport2010en [accessed03.03.12].
BatesBC,KundzewiczZW,WuS,PalutikofJP.Climatechangeandwater—IPCC tech-nicalpaperVI.Geneva:IPCCSecretariat;2008.
BCAD Broward County Aviation Department. Annual statistical report; 2010. Available from: http://www.broward.org/Airport/About/Documents/ Fy10aviationhistoricalanalysis.pdf[accessed03.03.12].
BrooksDB.Anoperationaldefinitionofwaterdemandmanagement.International JournalofWaterResourcesDevelopment2006;22(4):521–8.
CasaniS,Rouhany M,KnøchelS.Adiscussionpaperonchallenges and limi-tationsto waterreuseandhygiene inthefoodindustry. WaterResearch 2005;39(6):1134–46.
CDA Chicago Department of Aviation. Sustainable airport manual; 2010. Availablefrom: http://www.airportsgoinggreen.org/Content/Documents/CDA-SAM-v2.1-Octobe-31-2011-FINAL.pdf[accessed20.02.12].
ChangTC,YouSJ,ChuangSH.Evaluationforthereclamationpotentialof high-techindustrialwastewatereffluenttreatedwithdifferentmembraneprocesses. EnvironmentalEngineeringScience2007;24(6):762–8.
ChiouRJ,ChangTC,OuyangCF.Aspectsofmunicipalwastewaterreclamationand reuseforfuturewaterresourceshortagesinTaiwan.WaterScienceand Tech-nology2007;55(1–2):397–405.
DaiHL,ZhangKL,XuXL,YuHY.Evaluationontheeffectsofdeicingchemicalsonsoil andwaterenvironment.ProcediaEnvironmentalSciences2012;13:2122–30. DCADubaiDepartmentofCivilAviation.Publicenvironmentreport;2004.
Avail-able from: http://www.aerohabitat.eu/uploads/media/12-01-2009-Dubai Airport-PublicEnvironmentalReport2003-04.pdf[accessed03.03.12]. DOA Atlanta Department of Civil Aviation—Hartsfield-Jackson Atlanta
Inter-national Airport. Annual environmental report; 2009. Available from: http://www.atlanta-airport.com/docs/Airport/Environmental/2009%20Annual %20Env%20ReportRevised%205-27-10.pdf[accessed03.03.12].
DOAAtlanta Department ofCivil Aviation—Hartsfield-JacksonAtlanta Interna-tional Airport.Annualenvironmentalreport: 2010progressupdate; 2010. Availablefrom:http://www.atlanta-airport.com/docs/Airport/Environmental/ 2010ProgressUpdate.pdf[accessed03.07.12].
FadlelmawlaA.TowardssustainablewaterpolicyinKuwait:reformsofthecurrent practicesandtherequiredinvestments,institutionalandlegislativemeasures. WaterResourcesManagement2009;23(10):1969–87.
FraportAGFrankfurtAirportGroup.Environmentalstatement2008and Envi-ronmental program to 2011 for Frankfurt Airport; 2011. Available from: http://www.fraport.com/content/fraport-ag/en/misc/binaer/sustainability/ environmentalstatements/environmentalreport2008/jcr:content.file/file.pdf [accessed03.03.12].
Fraport AG Frankfurt Airport Group. Connecting sustainably report; 2010. Available from: http://www.fraport.com/content/fraport-ag/en/misc/binaer/ sustainability/sustainabilityreport2010/jcr:content.file/sustainabilityreport 2010.pdf[accessed03.03.12].
GhisiE,FerreiraDF.Potentialforpotablewatersavingsbyusingrainwaterand greywaterinamulti-storeyresidentialbuildinginsouthernBrazil.Buildingand Environment2007;42(7):2512–22.
GilboaY, Friedler E.UV disinfectionof RBC-treated light greywatereffluent: kinetics,survivalandregrowthofselectedmicroorganisms.WaterResearch 2008;42(4–5):1043–50.
GTAAGreaterTorontoAirportsAuthority.Environmentalperformancereport;2006. Available from: http://www.torontopearson.com/WorkArea/DownloadAsset. aspx?id=1360[accessed20.02.12].
GTAAGreaterTorontoAirportsAuthority.Corporateresponsibilityreport;2010. Available from: http://www.torontopearson.com/uploadedFiles/GTAA/ Content/Publications/SocialResponsibility/GTAA%20CR%20Online.pdf [accessed20.02.12].
HernándezLealL,TemminkH,ZeemanG,BuismanCJN.Characterizationand anaer-obicbiodegradabilityofgreywater.Desalination2011;270(1–3):111–5. HespanholI,Gonc¸alvesOM.Conservac¸ãoereúsodeágua—manualdeorientac¸ões
paraosetorindustrial[Waterreuseandconservation-guideforthe indus-trial sector]. São Paulo, Brazil: FIESP/CIESP; 2004. Available from: http:// www.fiesp.com.br/publicacoes/pdf/ambiente/reuso.pdf[accessed17.01.12][in Portuguese].
HKIAHongKongInternationalAirport.Plantthefuture—annualreport2010/2011; 2011. Available from: http://www.hongkongairport.com/eng/pdf/media/ publication/report/1011/efull.pdf[accessed03.03.12].
HurlimannA.Householduseofandsatisfactionwithalternativewatersourcesin VictoriaAustralia.JournalofEnvironmentManagement2011;92(10):2691–7. ICAOInternationalCivilAviationOrganization.AnnualreportoftheCouncil;2010.
Available from: http://www.icao.int/publications/Documents/9952en.pdf [accessed03.03.12].
IglesiasA,GarroteL,DizA,SchlickenriederJ,Martin-CarrascoF.Re-thinkingwater policyprioritiesintheMediterraneanregioninviewofclimatechange. Envi-ronmentalScience&Policy2011;14(7):744–57.
JamwalP,MittalAK.ReuseoftreatedsewageinDelhicity:microbialevaluationof STPsreuseoptions.ResourcesConservationandRecycling2010;54(4):211–21. JimenezB,ChavezA.LowcosttechnologyforreliableuseofMexicoCity’s
wastewa-terforagriculturalirrigation.Technology2003;9(1–2):95–108.
Jimenez-CisnerosB, Maya-RendónC, Salgado-VelázquezG. Theeliminationof helminthova,faecalcoliforms, salmonellaandprotozoancystsby various physicochemicalprocessesinwastewaterandsludge.WaterScienceand Tech-nology2001;43(12):179–82.
KahindaJM,TaigbenuAE.RainwaterharvestinginSouthAfrica:Challengesand opportunities.PhysicsandChemistryoftheEarth2011;36:968–76.
LHRLondonHeathrowAirport.Sustainabilityperformancesummary;2010. Avail-able from: http://www.heathrowairport.com/static/Heathrow/Downloads/ PDF/2010-sustainability-performance-summary.pdf[accessed03.03.12].
LiF,WichmannK,OtterpohlR.Reviewofthetechnologicalapproachesforgrey watertreatmentand reuses.Science ofthe TotalEnvironment 2009;407: 3439–49.
LiuS,ButlerD,MemonFA,MakropoulosC,AveryL,JeffersonB.Impactsofresidence timeduringstorageonpotentialofwatersavingforgreywaterrecyclingsystem. WaterResearch2010;44(1):267–77.
LiuZ,QunM,AnW,SunZ.Anapplicationofmembranebio-reactorprocess forthewastewatertreatmentofQindaoInternationalAirport.Desalination 2007;202(1–3):144–9.
MADMadrid-BarajasAirport. Environmentalmanagementreport;2010. Avail-able from: http://www.aena-aeropuertos.es/csee/ccurl/54/66/barajasMA WEB ingok.pdf[accessed15.03.12].
MAG Manchester Airport Group. Environmental plan (part of the Manches-ter Airport master plan to 2030); 2007. Available from: http://www. manchesterairport.co.uk/manweb.nsf/alldocs/8100FB8EF658808C8025736400 2D85FA/$File/Environment+Plan.pdf[accessed15.01.12].
MAG Manchester Airport Group. Sustainability report 2010/11; 2011. Avail-able from: http://www.manchesterairport.co.uk/manweb.nsf/alldocs/ 8100FB8EF658808C80257364002D85FA/$File/SustainabilityReport.pdf [accessed15.01.12].
MegdalSB.WaterResourceAvailabilityFortheTucsonMetropolitanArea.Tucson: WaterResourcesResearchCenter;2006.
MoreiraNetoRF,Carvalho IC,Calijuri ML,SantiagoAF.Rainwater usein air-ports:acasestudyinBrazil.ResourcesConservationandRecycling2012;68: 36–43.
MUC Munich Airport. Perspectives: sustainability and annual report; 2010. Available from: http://www.munich-airport.de/media/download/general/ publikationen/en/ib2010en.pdf[accessed15.01.12].
NIACNaritaInternationalAirportCorporation.NaritaAirportenvironmentreport; 2011. Available from:http://www.naa.jp/en/environment/pdf2011/kankyo report2011.pdf[accessed03.03.12].
OttosonJ,StenströmTA.Faecalcontaminationofgreywaterandassociatedmicrobial risks.WaterResearch2003;37(3):645–55.
Pizzato M,Alves N. Gestão Sustentável dos RecursosHídricos noAeroporto InternacionaldoRiodeJaneiro—Galeão;2010[Sustainablemanagementofthe waterresourcesinRiodeJaneiroInternationalAirport].RevistaMeioFiltrante. Available from: http://www.meiofiltrante.com.br/materiasver.asp?action= detalhe&id=616&revista=n45[accessed20.02.12].
Quevauviller P. Adapting to climate change: reducing water-related risks in Europe—EUpolicyandresearchconsiderations.EnvironmentalScience&Policy 2011;14(7):722–9.
RyanAM,SpashCL,MeashamTG.Socio-economicandpsychologicalpredictorsof domesticgreywaterandrainwatercollection:evidencefromAustralia.Journal ofHydrology2009;379:164–71.
Schiphol Group. Annual Report; 2011. Available from: http://2011. annualreportschiphol.com/fbcontent.ashx/downloads/SchipholAnnualreport 2011ENG.pdf[accessed03.03.12].
SchlüterM,HirschD,Pahl-WostlC.Copingwithchange:responsesoftheUzbek watermanagementregimetosocio-economictransitionandglobalchange. EnvironmentalScience&Policy2010;13(7):620–36.
SFIASan FranciscoInternational Airport.Environmental SustainabilityReport; 2011. Available from: http://www.flysfo.com/downloads/reports/SFO2011 Environmental Sustainability Report.pdf[accessed20.02.12].
SYDSydneyAirport.SydneyAirportMasterPlan–Sustainability,ClimateChange and Environmental Management; 2009a. Available from: http://www. sydneyairport.com.au/corporate/community-environment-and-planning/∼/ media/Files/Corporate/Environment%20Plan/Master%20Plan/
14SustainabilityEnviro.pdf[accessed20.02.12].
SYDSydneyAirport.WaterRecyclingPlant;2009b.Availablefrom:http://www. sydneyairport.com.au/corporate/about-us/building-a-better-airport/water-recycling-plant.aspx[accessed20.02.12].
SYD Sydney Airport. Key highlights; 2010. Available from: http://www. sydneyairport.com.au/corporate/∼/media/files/corporate/about%20us/annual% 20report/2010/key%20highlights%2010.pdf[accessed20.02.12].
UrkiagaA,delasFuentesL,BisB,ChiruE,BalaszB,HernandezF.Developmentof anal-ysistoolsforsocial,economicandecologicaleffectsofwaterreuse.Desalination 2008;218(1–3):81–91.
WHO.WorldHealthOrganization.GuidetoHygieneandSanitationinAviation.3rd ed.Geneva:WorldHealthOrganization;2009.
WiekA,LarsonKL.Water,people,andsustainability—asystemsframeworkfor ana-lyzingandassessingwatergovernanceregimes.WaterResourcesManagement 2012;26(11):3153–71.
WillisRM,StewartRA,PanuwatwanichK,WilliamsPR,HollingsworthAL. Quan-tifyingtheinfluenceofenvironmentalandwaterconservationattitudeson householdendusewaterconsumption.JournalofEnvironmentManagement 2011;92(8):1996–2009.
ZhongL,MolAPJ.WaterpricereformsinChina:policy-makingandimplementation. WaterResourcesManagement2010;24(2):377–96.
ZIA Zurich International Airport. Annual report; 2010. Available from: http://www.zurich-airport.com/Portaldata/2/Resources/documents
unternehmen/investorrelations/geschaeftsbericht/AnnualReport2010.pdf [accessed20.02.12].