• Nenhum resultado encontrado

Rev. dor vol.14 número1 en v14n1a19

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2018

Share "Rev. dor vol.14 número1 en v14n1a19"

Copied!
1
0
0

Texto

(1)

LETTER TO THE EDITOR

Pain treatment presentation and manual have not changed the prescription of analgesics in the postoperative period of gynecological surgeries

Palestra e manual sobre tratamento da dor, não alteraram a prescrição de analgésicos no pós-operatório de cirurgias ginecológicas

Rev Dor. 2012;13(4):338-42

Mr. editor,

he above-mentioned article, by Lívia Gabriela Truvilho Giancoli, Maria Angélica Ferreira Leite Azevedo Fonseca, Elton Constantino, Oscar Cesar Pires e Irimar de Paula Posso, carried out in the University of Taubaté, makes clear the diiculty to change physicians’ root concepts to adequately treat acute postoperative pain.

he authors make clear that analgesic planning for acute postoperative pain is critical for its efective control, because when postoperative pain is not adequately managed it brings noxious body changes.

In addition to analgesic planning to manage postoperative pain being critical for its efective control, to improve patients’ assistance quality and to speed their recovery, it is oten neglected, especially because there is the belief that postoperative pain is not harmful for patients or that it is a normal surgical consequence. here is also fear that pain relief may mask diagnosis or signs of adverse events, added to the lack of knowledge about the huge variables of analgesic needs and the lack of regular and frequent pain evaluation. One may also mention lack of knowledge about analgesics pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynam-ics, and also fear of opioid addiction and the exaggerated concern with opioid-induced respiratory depression, which have led patients to feel unnecessary postoperative pain.

In their prospective study they have evaluated the change in analgesics prescription in the postoperative period of gynecologi-cal surgeries before and ater the presentation of a symposium and the distribution of a pain management manual to assistant and resident physicians and to medical students of the ith and sixth years of that University.

Results have shown that pain intensity evaluated by the numerical pain scale was moderate or mild in the three studied groups, however with regard to medical prescription there were no signiicant changes in the three study groups, prevailing the combination of the common analgesic dipirone with non-steroid anti-inlammatory drugs ketoprofen or tenoxicam, with very low use of opioids.

Opioids were not so oten used because pain was mild or moderate, however opioids’ side-efects phobia and the need for a trained nursing team to early identify potential complications and to timely act faced to life threatening complications, cer-tainly has created the culture of using opioids only as the last resource, when pain is no longer bearable. Physicians and nurses’ education should be focused on removing the prejudice with regard to this class of analgesics, indicated as one component of multimodal analgesia whenever pain is moderate or more severe.

Since gynecological surgeries have a relatively low pain potential, gynecologists are more familiar with the use of non-opioid analgesics, but pain of those patients should be more carefully managed, taking into consideration that painful percep-tion diferences related to gender and to pain inhibitory system hypoactivity in females may be associated to hyperalgesia in females, in addition to their previous pain experience and anxiety with regard to surgery.

he results of this study, in addition to conirming other national and international studies, show the need for efectively including the study of pain in medical and nursing courses curricula and for well structured campaigns to teach professionals who manage patients in the perioperative period on how to adequately manage acute postoperative pain, which has an appointment to start and may be adequately controlled with attention and care to patients.

Ricardo de Sousa e Silva hiago Pontes Pereira Chequetto

78

Referências

Documentos relacionados

Results: Pain relief could not be achieved in 23% of the patients (unacceptable), whereas pain was completely relieved in 35% of the patients (excellent) and mild to moderate

The main pain experienced by pregnant women was that caused by hot/cold liquids or sweets (56.3%), followed by spontaneous pain (38.8%), pain in the face (23.8%) and pain in

A presença de cascalheiras, linhas de pedra, blocos de couraça nas bordas de superfícies de erosão plio-pleistocênicas fora interpretada como indicadora de descontinuidades

Medical charts have shown relevant pain character- istics of AIDS patients, especially notes about pain presence, location, duration and intensity for most patients; however,

Mean pain intensity evaluated by the numerical scale was 6.7 ± 1.83, which may be considered moderate pain and sensory pain by McGill questionnaire.. CONCLUSION : Moderate and

The results showed that the pressure pain threshold was reduced in all spots evaluated during the menstrual phase (with pain) and that there was a higher postural sway of women

a) Interpretação extensiva do art.196 da Constituição Federal: A maior parte dos atores que protagoniza a judicialização da saúde utiliza apenas a primeira parte do artigo“ a

In regard of the level of pain reported by patients in the control group the mean rating in the pain scale was 1.86 ± 1.33 at the moment prior to the electroanalgesia treatment