• Nenhum resultado encontrado

Modelo preditivo para diferenciação entre nódulos malignos e benignos da tireoide com base na idade, sexo e características ultrassonográficas

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Modelo preditivo para diferenciação entre nódulos malignos e benignos da tireoide com base na idade, sexo e características ultrassonográficas"

Copied!
8
0
0

Texto

(1)

www.bjorl.org

Brazilian

Journal

of

OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY

ORIGINAL

ARTICLE

A

predictive

model

to

distinguish

malignant

and

benign

thyroid

nodules

based

on

age,

gender

and

ultrasonographic

features

Fábio

Muradás

Girardi

a,

,

Laura

Mezzomo

da

Silva

b

,

Cecilia

Dias

Flores

c

aComplexoHospitalarSantaCasa,HospitalSantaRita,DepartamentodeCirurgiadeCabec¸aePescoc¸o,PortoAlegre,RS,Brazil bComplexoHospitalarSantaCasa,DepartamentodeRadiologia,PortoAlegre,RS,Brazil

cUniversidadeFederaldeCiênciasdaSaúdedePortoAlegre(UFCSPA),DepartamentodeInformática,PortoAlegre,RS,Brazil

Received14January2017;accepted2October2017 Availableonline4November2017

KEYWORDS Thyroidnodule; Thyroidneoplasms; Ultrasonography; Cytology; Biopsyneedle Abstract

Introduction:A discussion inliterature about a standardized decision support tool for the managementofthyroidnodulesremains.

Objective:Thepurposeofthisstudywastocreateastatisticalpredictionmodelforthyroid nodulesmanagement.

Methods:Twohundredandfourbenignand57malignantthyroidnoduleswereselectedfora retrospectivestudy.Thevariablesage,genderandultrasonographicfeatureswereexamined usingunivariateandmultivariatemodels.Astatisticalformulawasusedtocalculatetherisk ofcancerofeachcase.

Results:Inmultivariateanalysis,irregularshape,absenceofhalo,lowermeanage, homoge-neousechotexture,microcalcificationsandsolid contentwereassociated withcancer.After applyingtheformula,20cases(7.6%)withacalculatedriskformalignancy≤3.0%werefound, allofthembenign.Settingthecalculatedrisk in≥80%, 21(8.0%)caseswere selected,and in85.7%ofthemcancerwasconfirmedinhistopathology.Internalaccuracyoftheprediction formulawas92.5%.

Conclusions:Thepredictionformulareachedhighaccuracyandmaybeanalternativetoother decisionsupporttoolsforthyroidnodulemanagement.

© 2017 Associac¸˜ao Brasileira de Otorrinolaringologia e Cirurgia C´ervico-Facial. Published by Elsevier Editora Ltda. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Pleasecitethisarticleas:GirardiFM,SilvaLM,FloresCD.Apredictivemodeltodistinguishmalignantandbenignthyroidnodulesbased

onage,genderandultrasonographicfeatures.BrazJOtorhinolaryngol.2019;85:24---31.

Correspondingauthor.

E-mail:fabiomgirardi@gmail.com(F.M.Girardi).

PeerReviewundertheresponsibilityofAssociac¸ãoBrasileiradeOtorrinolaringologiaeCirurgiaCérvico-Facial.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjorl.2017.10.001

1808-8694/©2017Associac¸˜aoBrasileiradeOtorrinolaringologiaeCirurgiaC´ervico-Facial.PublishedbyElsevierEditoraLtda.Thisisanopen accessarticleundertheCCBYlicense(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

(2)

PALAVRAS-CHAVE Nódulodatireoide; Neoplasiasda tireoide; Ultrassonografia; Citologia;

Biópsiaporagulha

Modelopreditivoparadiferenciac¸ãoentrenódulosmalignosebenignosdatireoide combasenaidade,sexoecaracterísticasultrassonográficas

Resumo

Introduc¸ão: Persistenaliteraturaumadiscussãosobreumaferramentapadronizadadeapoio àdecisãoparaomanejodenódulostireoidianos.

Objetivo: Criarummodelodeprevisãoestatísticaparaomanejodenódulostireoidianos. Método: Foramselecionados204casosdenódulostireoidianosbenignose57malignosparao estudoretrospectivo.Asvariáveisidade,sexoecaracterísticasultrassonográficasforam anali-sadascommodelosunivariadosemultivariados.Umafórmulaestatísticafoiusadaparacalcular oriscodecâncerdecadacaso.

Resultados: Naanálisemultivariada,aformairregular,aausênciadehalo,menoridademédia, ecotexturahomogênea,microcalcificac¸õeseconteúdosólidoforamassociadasaocâncer.Apósa aplicac¸ãodafórmula,foramencontrados20casos(7,6%)comriscocalculadodemalignidade≤ 3,0%,todosbenignos.Definiu-seoriscocalculadoem≥80%,21casos(8,0%)foramselecionados eem85,7%delesocâncerfoiconfirmadopelahistopatologia.Aprecisãointernadafórmulade previsãofoide92,5%.

Conclusões: Afórmuladeprevisãoalcanc¸oualtaprecisãoepodeserumaopc¸ãoparaoutras ferramentasdeapoioàdecisãoparaomanejodenódulosdatireoide.

© 2017 Associac¸˜ao Brasileira de Otorrinolaringologia e Cirurgia C´ervico-Facial. Publicado por Elsevier Editora Ltda. Este ´e um artigo Open Access sob uma licenc¸a CC BY (http:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Introduction

The incidence of thyroid cancer has been rising around

the world.1---3 Despitethe high prevalence of thyroid

nod-ules(19---67% onultrasonography--- US),most ofthem are

benign.Onlyabout5---10%ofdiagnosednodulesare

malig-nant, although it is well known that this frequency may

be higher when considering occasional diagnosis of small

microcarcinomas.4---6

Theinvestigationoftheselesionsusuallyrequiresclinical

and imaging examination of the neck, sometimes

associ-atedwithfine-needleaspirationbiopsy(FNAB).Amongthese

imagingtests,USareasafe,cheap,noninvasive and

non-radioactivitytool,abletodetectandqualitativelyevaluate

thenodules.Tothisdate,noUSsignshowedtobe

pathog-nomonicofmalignancy,however,thecombinationofseveral

characteristicsmayhelpdeterminatethemalignancyriskof

anodule.7---9

DifferentUSsensitivities,specificities,negativeand

pos-itive predictive values have been observed. There are

variations in US terminology and malignancy criteria as

well asan overlapbetween the US features of malignant

and benign nodules among the different studies. Clinical

featuresarenotcommonlyusedwhenapplyingprediction

models.10,11Moreover,verificationbiasfrequentlyoccurs,as

manystudiesarenotdesignedsothatallFNABdiagnosesare

verifiedbysurgeryorclinicalobservation.

Some well-designed studies investigated the reliability

of US findings in comparison with histopathology.7,10,12---14

Three studiesused aformula basedon theanalysis ofUS

featurestopredictmalignancy.7,15,16Nevertheless,noneof

themincludedclinicalcharacteristics.Parketal.proposed

apredictivemodelbasedonalogitformula,stratifyingeach

lesionintodifferentapproachcategories,allowingittobe

usedinfuturedecision analyses.16 Amodel similartothe

oneusedbyParketal.wasappliedinasampleofsurgically

treatedcasesintheauthors’service,developingastatistical

decisionsupporttool,basedongender,ageandUSfeatures.

Internal analysis according to pre-operatory cytology was

alsoperformed.

Methods

Allpatientswhohadundergonethyroidectomybetween

Jan-uary2009andDecember2013,whoseUSandUSG-FNABhad

beenperformedintheauthors’institutionwere

retrospec-tively evaluated. Institutional review board approval was

obtained(3593/11).

Duringthestudied period,192patients wereincluded,

corresponding to 261 nodules. Each nodule analyzed as

anindividualcase.Histopathologicalexaminationwas

per-formed by the same professional (MBB) in 238 (91.1%)

cases. In 86 cases (32.9%) surgery was indicated because

of goiter with compressive symptoms or relative

indica-tions (as large nodules in younger patients); in 67 cases

(25.6%), becauseof nodules withundetermined cytology;

in47cases(18.0%),becauseofsolidnoduleswithrepeated

non-diagnosticcytology;andin61cases(23.3%),becauseof

nodulescytologically(45---17.2%)orclinicallysuspiciousfor

cancer(16---6.1%).

B-mode US and color Doppler examinations were

per-formed,usingToshibaequipmentmodel Xario(SSA660A),

withahigh-resolutionlineartransducer(7.5---14MHz).FNAB

wasperformed withUSguiding, usinga 24 gaugeneedle.

When in the presence of a multi-nodular goiter, samples

were collected from nodules with the highest index of

suspicion on ultrasonography. In partially cystic nodules,

(3)

structure of this study was modeled in 2008, the

uti-lization of the old Bethesda rating was chosen. The

cytologicaldiagnoseswereclassifiedin:(I)non-diagnostic;

(II) benign; (III) undetermined; (IV) suspicious for

malig-nancy; and (V) malignant. In cases with more than two

cytological results in one patient, the result most likely

to be malignant was assigned. After histopathological

study, resected nodules were classified as: (I) malignant

(papillarycarcinoma,follicular carcinoma, anaplastic

car-cinoma, poorly differentiated and medullary carcinoma);

or(II)benign(nodularhyperplasia,colloidalgoiter,nodular

lymphocyticorHashimoto’sthyroiditis, andfollicular

ade-noma).

USfindings,gender andageofallpatientswere

recov-ered from files. All cytological and histological results

from patients submitted to thyroidectomies were

recov-ered.Thefollowingvariableswereinsertedintoaspecific

database: age, gender, US findings, cytological and

his-tological results. US features of nodules were classified

for: (I) echogenicity (marked hypoechoic, predominantly

hypoechoic,predominantlyisoechoic,predominantly

hyper-echoic, or predominantly anechoic); (II) internal content

(predominantly solid (liquid portion ≤10% of the

nod-ule volume); mixed solid-cystic (liquid portion >10% but

≤50% of the nodule volume); predominantly cystic

(liq-uid portion >50%, but ≤90% of the nodule volume);

purely cystic (liquid portion >90% of the nodule

vol-ume));(III) echotexture(homogeneousor heterogeneous);

(IV)calcification(microcalcifications,macrocalcificationsor

peripheralrimcalcifications,alsocalled‘eggshell’

calcifica-tions); (V)halo (present and complete; partially present;

or absent); (VI) margins (‘‘defined’’ or ‘‘undefined’’);

(VII) shape (regular, irregular or lobulated); (VIII)

vascu-larflow(predominantlycentral;predominantlyperipheral;

mixedcentral andperipheral; or absent); (IX) locationof

the nodule or affected lobe (right lobe, isthmus, or left

lobe).

Frequencies and distribution of each selected

vari-able were calculated. The authors used mean (Standard

Deviation --- SD), absolute frequencies and percentages,

as appropriate. For differences between groups, the

authors used Chi-square tests for categorical variables

and Student’s t-test for continuous variables.

Logis-tic regression was used to identify US characteristics

independently associated with malignancy (dependent

variable). The level of statistical significance was set

at 5%. All statistical analyses were performed by

the software SPSS, version 15.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago,

IL).

Aformulawasusedtocalculatetheprobabilityofcancer

based on the multiple regression analysis results:

Proba-bility(Z)=1/1+e−(˛+



ˇiXi);where ‘‘e’’and‘‘˛’’represent

mathematicalconstants;and‘‘ˇ’’,thecoefficientofeach

independentvariable(‘‘X’’).

Applying thestatisticaltool,the authorscouldobserve

a varying risk of malignancy depending on the variables

setting.The mathematicalformula forrisk predictionwas

applied in all analyzed cases, which were stratified into

low risk, intermediate risk, and high risk of malignancy,

assumingspecificcut-pointsadaptedtotheobtainedresults.

Internal analyses according to cytological results were

made.

Results

SampleUSfeaturesaresummarizedinTable1.Thepatients

mean age was50.06 years(ranging from13 to87 years),

withamale-to-femaleratioof1:7.7.Themeannodulesize

was2.17cm(rangingfrom0.3to6.6cm).

Malignancy was found after histopathological study in

57(21.8%)resectednodules(55papillarycarcinomaand2

follicular carcinoma).Multifocalitywasfound in24 (9.1%)

cases.Among benigndiagnoses,45(22.0%) werefollicular

adenoma;132(64.7%),follicularhyperplasia;10(4.9%),

col-loid nodules; and 17 (8.3%), nodularform of Hashimoto’s

thyroiditis.FNABresultswerebenignin95(36.3%)nodules;

suspicious,in16(6.1%);malignant,in30(11.4%);

undeter-mined,in73(27.9%);andnon-diagnostic,in47(18.0%).

Based on the histopathological and ultrasonography

description,itwaspossibletodetermine,incasesof

multin-odular goiters, the histologyof each nodule submittedto

FNAB.Amongallbenignconfirmedcasesonhistopathology,

an occasionallydiagnosedpapillarythyroidcarcinomawas

found inother partsof theglandin 26(9.9%) cases

(nod-ules that were not the subjectof the investigation). The

mean diameter of occasionally diagnosed carcinomaswas

0.73cm(variationof0.2---2.4cm).Amongthem,23(95.8%)

weremicrocarcinomas.

Inunivariateanalysis,thefollowingfeatureswere

asso-ciated to malignancy: lower mean age (p=0.031), lower

diameter (p=0.004),solid content(p<0.001), absence of

halo (p<0.001), irregular or lobulated shape (p<0.001

and p<0.041,respectively), microcalcification(p<0.001),

hypoechoic texture (p<0.001), and ill-defined margins

(p=0.001)(Table1).Inmultivariateanalysis,irregularshape

(p=0.039), absence of halo (p=0.016), lower mean age

(p=0.020), homogeneous echotexture (p=0.019),

micro-calcification (p=0.014),andsolidcontent(p=0.007)were

associatedwithcancer(Table2).Withtheregression

analy-sisresults,theauthorselaboratedanequationtocalculate

theriskofcancerofadeterminedthyroidnodule(z),as

fol-lowsbelow.Theauthorsfoundinconsistence’swhenworked

withthevariableechogenicityinmultivariateanalysis.The

authorsalsoconsidereddiameterasaselection bias.Both

variableswereexcludedfromtheequation:

Z= 1 1+exp(−(−4.642+0.465∗X1---0.033∗X2 +0.916∗X3+0.353∗X4---0.061∗X5+1.475∗X6 +1.600∗X7+1.708∗X8+0.889∗X9---0.283∗X10 +1.929∗X11+0.762∗X12+0.418∗X13 +1.461∗X14+2.133∗X15---0.898∗X16---0.817∗X17 ---0.078∗X18))∗100

The X constants shown in this equation are defined in

Table3.

Theapplication ofthepredictionformula resultedin a

calculated riskof cancer ranging from0.49% to97.64% in

the present cohort. Dividing thissample according tothe

calculatedrisk,itwasobservedanincreasingproportionof

cancer cases asthecalculated cancer risk rose(Table 4).

Twentycases(7.6%)hadacalculatedrisk≤3.0%,allofthem

(4)

Table1 Univariateanalysis:clinicalandultrasonographicfeaturesamongmalignantandbenigncases.

Benign Malignant Total p-value

Mean(SD) Mean(SD) Mean(SD)

Age 51.04(13.41) 46.54(15.00) 50.06(13.87) 0.031 Diameter 2.31(1.25) 1.68(1.14) 2.17(1.25) 0.004 n=204 %=78.1 n=57 %=21.8 n=261 %=100 Gender(M/F) 23/181 11.2/88.7 7/50 12.2/87.7 30/231 11.4/88.5 0.867 Position 0.125 Leftlobe 94 46.0 21 36.8 115 44.0 Rightlobe 79 38.7 21 36.8 100 38.3 Isthmus 31 15.1 14 24.5 45 17.2 NI 0 0 1 1.7 1 0.3 Content <0.001 Solid 108 52.9 47 82.4 155 59.3

Mixedpred.cystic 2 0.9 0 0 2 0.7

Mixedpred.solid 73 35.7 7 12.2 80 30.6

Cystic 21 10.2 3 5.2 24 9.1 Echotexture 0.403 Heterogeneous 36 17.6 7 12.2 43 16.4 Homogeneous 168 82.3 50 87.7 218 83.5 Echogenicity <0.001 Pred.anechoic 22 10.7 2 3.5 24 9.1 Pred.hypoechoic 47 23.0 7 12.2 54 20.6 Pred.hyperecoic 11 5.3 0 0 11 4.2 Pred.isoechoic 85 41.6 11 19.2 96 36.7 Markedlyhypoechoic 36 17.6 36 63.1 72 27.5 NI 3 1.4 1 1.7 4 1.5 Halo <0.001 Absent 55 26.9 35 61.4 90 34.4 Regular 106 51.9 18 31.5 124 47.5 Irregular 43 21.0 4 7.0 47 18.0 Margins 0.001 Welldefined 197 96.5 51 89.4 248 95.0 Illdefined 7 3.4 6 10.5 13 4.9 Shape <0.001 Regular 178 87.2 29 50.8 207 79.3 Irregular 12 5.8 17 29.8 29 11.1 Lobulated 14 6.8 11 19.2 25 9.5 Calcifications <0.001 Absent 160 78.4 22 38.5 182 69.7 Macrocalcifications 11 5.3 5 8.7 16 6.1 Peripheral(‘‘eggshell’’) 9 4.4 1 1.7 10 3.8 Microcalcifications 24 11.7 29 50.8 53 20.3 Vascularflow 0.959 Absent 10 4.9 3 5.2 13 4.9 Intranodular 102 50.0 25 43.8 127 48.6 Perinodular 59 28.9 17 29.8 76 29.1 Peri-intranodular 23 11.2 6 10.5 29 11.1 NI 10 4.9 6 10.5 16 6.1

n,absolutefrequency;%,relativefrequency;SD,StandardDeviation;ageinyears;diameterincentimeters;p-value,levelofsignificance used;NI,notinformed;M/F,male/female;Pred,predominant.

calculatedriskin≥80%,21(8.0%)caseswereselectedand 85.7% of them confirmed cancer on histopathology. Using thesecut-pointvalues,thesensitivity,specificity,accuracy, positive and negative predictive values of the prediction formulawere100%,86.3%,92.5%,85.7%,and100%, respec-tively(Table5).

Thepredictionformularesultswerestratifiedaccording

tocytology and the same previous cut-point values were

applied.Amongthe73undeterminedcases,10(13.6%)cases

wereclassifiedinlowriskgroupandnoneofthemconfirmed

malignancy.Inaddition,whenthecalculatedriskwas≥80%,

(5)

Table2 Independentclinicalandultrasonographicfactorsassociatedtomalignityaftermultipleregressions. ˇ SE p-value OR 95%CI Lower Upper Irregularshape 0.762 0.629 0.016 6.884 1.434 33.044 Microcalcification 2.066 1.222 0.014 7.895 0.719 86.660 Absenthalo 1.929 0.800 0.016 5.522 1.370 22.249 Homogeneousechotexture 1.601 0.682 0.019 4.956 1.302 18.858

Lowermeanage 0.034 0.015 0.020 0.967 0.940 0.995

Solidcontent 1.475 0.551 0.007 4.373 1.302 18.588

ˇ,coefficientofdetermination;SE,StandardError;p-value,levelofsignificance;OR,oddsratiovalue;CI,confidenceinterval.

Table3 Definitionoftheindependentvariablesusedintheequationtocalculatetheriskofmalignancyofathyroidnodule. Variable Features

X1 Gender:female=0;Male=1

X2 Age:inyears

X3 Isthmuslocation=1;ifleftorrightlobe=0 X4 Rightlobelocation=1;ifisthmusorleftlobe=0

X5 Predominantlyorpurelycysticcontent=1;ifpredominantlysolidormixedsolid-cystic=0 X6 Predominantlysolidcontent=1;ifpredominantlyorpurelycysticormixedsolid-cystic=0 X7 Homogeneousechotexture=1;heterogeneous=0

X8 Halo:ifabsent=1;ifpresentandcompleteorpartiallypresent=0 X9 Halo:ifpresentandcomplete=1;ifpartiallypresentorabsent=0 X10 Undefinedmargins=1;defined=0

X11 Irregularshape=1;ifregularorlobulated=0 X12 Lobulatedshape=1;ifirregularorregular=0

X13 Calcification:ifabsent=1;ifmicroormacrocalcificationsorperipheralrimcalcifications=0

X14 Calcification:ifmacrocalcifications=1;ifabsentormicrocalcificationsorperipheralrimcalcifications=0 X15 Calcification:ifmicrocalcifications=1;ifabsentormacrocalcificationsorperipheralrimcalcifications=0 X16 Absentvascularflow=1;ifpredominantlycentral,peripheralormixed=0

X17 Mixedvascularflow=1;ifabsent,predominantlycentralorperipheral=0 X18 Peripheralvascularflow=1;ifabsent,predominantlycentralormixed=0

Table4 Calculatedcancerriskapplyingthestatisticaltool.

Histopathology Calculatedcancerrisk

0---10% 10.1---30% 30.1---50% 50.1---70% 70.1---90% 90.1---100%

n % n % n % n % n % n %

Malignant 6 7.4 15 14.5 6 20.6 8 42.1 11 64.7 11 91.6

Total 81 103 29 19 17 12

Table5 Decisionsupportmodel.

Cases(%) 7.2 49.8 31.8 3.0 8.0

Calculatedcancerrisk(%) 0---3 3.1---20 20.1---69.9 70---79.9 80---100

Cancercases(%) 0 8.4 28.9 50.0 85.7

Clinicalmanagement Observation Observation/FNAB FNAB Surgery/FNAB Surgery FNAB,fine-needleaspirationbiopsy.

(6)

carcinoma.Among the47caseswithnon-diagnostic cytol-ogy, only 4 cases (8.5%) were set below the inferior cut point(allofthem confirmedbenignityonhistopathology), andonly1case(2.1%)wassetabovethecutpoint(thisone confirmedcancer).Amongcaseswithbenign,confirmatory and suspicious results for cancer oncytology, the predic-tionformulawaslessuseful. Inthe benigngroup,4 cases (4.2%)weresetabovethesuperiorcut-point,onlyone con-firmatoryforcancer.On theopposite,amongsuspiciousor confirmatorycases,onlyonecasewassetbelowtheinferior cut-point,withoutconfirmingcanceronhistopathology.

Discussion

TheimprovedUSqualityandwidespreadindicationofneck imagingexamsresultedinincreasingratesofthyroidnodules detection.1AccordingtotheAmericanThyroidAssociation

(ATA)recommendations,17FNABisthediagnosticmethodof

greater accuracy for detection of cancer amongpatients

with thyroid nodules, while performing cytological

exam-inations in all thyroidnodules is not cost-effective.Some

researchers recommend FNAB only in patients with

high-risk nodules.16,18 The authors found combinations of US

characteristics, age andgender informationable to

accu-ratelypredictthyroid cancer.Arisk stratificationscheme,

expressed in relative values (%), allows both patient and

surgeontomakeabetterdecisionabouttherecommended

treatment.Theapplicationoftwocut-pointvalueswas

sug-gested(≤3.0%and≥80%),avoidingbiopsiesin15.6%ofthis

sample. Infact,FNABwould evenincreasethenumberof

unnecessarysurgeriesinthelowriskgroup,asinonly5(25%)

casescytologicalresults wereindicativeofbenign disease

andother15(75%)caseswouldbetakentosurgerybecause

ofcytologicalcriteria.Inthehighriskgroup,FNABproved

tobeunnecessary,ascytologicalresultsweresuggestiveor

confirmatoryformalignancyin17(80.9%)cases.

Except for the diameter, all the other variables were

includedinthestatisticalformula.Eachvariable,evenwith

nostatisticallysignificantresultaftermultivariateanalysis,

presentssome effectover theresult,actingin adynamic

relation net. The authors chose to exclude the diameter

fromthestatisticalformula,asitwasconsidered a

selec-tionbias.SmallnodulessubmittedtoFNABareusuallymore

suspiciousforcancer.

Several studies reported promising results using US

to evaluate the risk of malignancy among cases with

undetermined,19,20 and non-diagnostic cytology.21 Despite

thelow representativenessofboth subgroupsin the

stud-ied sample, it wasidentified a part of these groups that

doesnotbenefitfromsurgerybecauseoftheextremelylow

riskof cancer,andanotherpartwithsuchahighrisk that

couldbetaken tosurgicaltreatment without theneed of

FNAB. Ifthe proposed inferior cut point werereduced to

≤13%, surgery wouldbe avoided in 21 (44.6%)cases with

non-diagnosticcytology,withoutmissinganycancer.

OtherauthorshavealreadydescribedtheUS

character-istic findings associated to thyroid cancer. The obtained

findings were similar to other studies, with some

varia-tionswhenthelogisticregressionanalysiswasapplied.Koike

etal.foundirregularshape,solidechotexture,ill-defined

margins,hypoechoiccharacteristics,andfinecalcifications

asstatistically associated with malignancy after multiple

regressionanalysis.7 Similar totheauthor’s results, other

researchersalsofoundlowermeanageasan independent

predictorformalignancyafter multivariateanalysis.11,22,23

Gul et al., in a large and well-designed study combining

US features together, found margin irregularity, followed

byhypoechoicpattern andmicrocalcificationsasthemost

importantUS features for malignancy prediction.In their

study, the combination of hypoechogenicity,

microcalci-fication, and margin irregularity was found as the most

predictive model for cancer (sensitivity of 65.2%,

speci-ficityof98.7%,andPPVof71.6%).13Somestudiescompared

US characteristics according to mixed benign cytological

andmalignanthistologicalresults.24---26Althoughitwasalso

foundassociationbetweenclassicalUSfeaturesandthyroid

cancer,thisstudydesigncanbeaffectedbyverificationbias,

asauthorsinferredsimilaraccuracyofFNABand

histopath-ologyforthyroiddiseases.

Different ways of grouping US characteristics and

sev-eralkindsofpredictionscalesweredescribedinliterature.

Horvathetal.elaboratedtheThyroidImagingReportingand

DataSystem(TIRADS),takingBI-RADSasamodel.17Itoetal.

classifiedUScharacteristicsinto5levelsofrisk,12similarto

thestudyofTomimorietal.,whichdividedUSresultsinto

fourlevels.27 Kwaketal.notedanincreasingriskof

malig-nancyasthe numberof suspicious US features increased.

AccordingtoKwaketal.,solidcontent,hypoechogenicity,

microlobulatedorirregularshape,presenceof

microcalcifi-cation,andnodulestallerthanwidewereallassociatedwith

malignancyafter multivariate analysis.14 Lin et al.

devel-opedadichotomousUSclassification:malignant,whensolid

echostructure,hypoechogenicity,finecalcification,and

ill-defined margin were present; and benign, when none of

thesecharacteristicswerepresent.28

Parketal.usedan equationtopredictthepresenceof

amalignant nodule, although theseauthors also included

cases withonly cytological results in the benign group.16

Theywentfurtherandsimplifiedthemalignancy

probabil-ityforeachnoduleusinga95%and99%confidenceinterval,

summarizingtherepresentative US findings in an

applica-bleclinicalsetting.Nixonetal.producedanomogramable

topredicttheneed toperformultrasound-guidedFNABon

athyroidnodulebasedonbiochemical,clinical,and

ultra-sonographyfeaturesof158patients,allofthemsubmitted

tothyroidectomy.Hypoechoicechotextureand

microcalci-ficationshadthehighestpredictivevalue.10

Inthispresent predictivemodel,the authors

standard-izedthesonographicdescriptionbeforethebeginningofthe

project,usingasimpleandreproduciblemethodology,like

theoneproposedbyAndriolietal.29Someavailableclinical

features(ageandgender)wereaddedtoastatisticalmodel

alreadyexploredbyotherauthors,7,15,16bringingthis

statis-ticaltooltothedoctor’sofficereality.Certainly,thismodel

couldbeimprovedincludingmoresonographicandclinical

variables,asexploredbyNixonetal.,10testingtheauthor’s

predictionformulainanexternalsampleorconfrontingtheir

resultstootherpredictionmodels,likeTIRADS.

The analysisof eachcase by thesame radiologistand,

inmost cases,by the samepathologist, turnsit easier to

standardizeand interpret data,despite increasesthe risk

of bias as there is not a confrontation of this

(7)

onasampleofpatientstreatedinatertiaryreferralcenter

mightturnitnotapplicabletoacommunitysetting.Inpart,

testingtheauthor’sdecisionsupporttoolinanexternal

sam-plemightbringthispredictionmodelclosertotheclinical

practiceandcouldminimizebothaforementionedbiases.

Conclusions

Therewasa sufficientbasis toobservepatients with

thy-roidnodulesunderlowsonographicriskwithoutusingFNAB,

eventhoselargerthan1cm.Itwasalsopossibletoidentify

anexpressivegroupathigh riskfor cancer,dispensingthe

need ofFNAB. The authors’decision supporttoolseemed

tobepracticalalsointhemanagementofthyroidnodules

withundeterminedandnon-diagnosticcytology.Theauthors

suggestedan approachbased onan extremelylow andan

extremely high risk of cancer. Nevertheless, other cases

couldbe included in an observational or moreaggressive

approach,dependingonhowmanycaseseachonewouldbe

comfortabletomissortoovertreat.

Conflicts

of

interest

Theauthorsdeclarenoconflictsofinterest.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge Dr. Luiz Felipe

Osowski, for helping with US reports standardization; Dr.

MarinezBizarroBarra,forthesupportonpathological

anal-ysis; and Felipe Lhywinskh Guella, for helping in data

acquirement.

References

1.DaviesL,WelchHG.Increasingincidenceofthyroidcancerin theUnitedStates,1973---2002.JAMA.2006;295:2164---7.

2.WardEM,JemalA,ChenA.Increasingincidenceofthyroid can-cer:isdiagnosticscrutinythesoleexplanation?FutureOncol. 2010;6:185---8.

3.KilfoyBA,ZhengT,HolfordTR,HanX,WardMH,SjodinA,etal. Internationalpatternsandtrendsinthyroidcancerincidence, 1973---2002.CancerCausesControl.2009;20:525---31.

4.Tan GH, Gharib H. Thyroid incidentalomas: management approachestononpalpablenodulesdiscoveredincidentallyon thyroidimaging.AnnInternMed.1997;126:226---31.

5.HarachHR,FranssilaKO,WaseniusVM.Occultpapillary carci-nomaofthethyroid:a‘‘normal’’finding inFinland.Cancer. 1985;56:531---8.

6.Welker MJ, Orlov D. Thyroid nodules. Am Fam Phys. 2003;67:559---66.

7.Koike E, Noguchi S, Yamashita H, Murakami T, Ohshima A, KawamotoH.Ultrasonographiccharacteristicsofthyroid nod-ules:predictionofmalignancy.ArchSurg.2001;136:334---7.

8.Camargo RY, Tomimori EK. Usefulness of ultrasound in the diagnosis and management of well-differentiated thyroid carcinoma. Arq Bras Endocrinol Metab. 2007;51: 783---92.

9.RemontiLR,KramerCK,Leitão CB,PintoLCF,GrossJL. Thy-roid ultrasoundfeaturesand riskof carcinoma:asystematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. Thyroid. 2015;25:538---50.

10.NixonIJ,GanlyI,HannLE,YuC,PalmerFL,WhitcherMM,etal. Nomogramforselectingthyroidnodulesforultrasound-guided fine-needleaspirationbiopsybasedonaquantificationofrisk ofmalignancy.HeadNeck.2013;35:1022---5.

11.Maia FF,MatosPS,SilvaBP, PalloneAT, Pavin EJ, VassalloJ, et al. Roleof ultrasound, clinicaland scintigraphic parame-terstopredictmalignancyinthyroidnodule.HeadNeckOncol. 2011;3:17.

12.ItoY,AminoN,YokozawaT,OtaH,OhshitaM,MurataN,etal. Ultrasonographicevaluationofthyroidnodulesin900patients: comparisonamongultrasonographic,cytological,and histolog-icalfindings.Thyroid.2007;17:1269---76.

13.GulK,ErsoyR,DirikocA,KorukluogluB,ErsoyPE,AydinR,etal. Ultrasonographicevaluationofthyroidnodules:comparisonof ultrasonographic, cytological, and histopathologicalfindings. Endocrine.2009;36:464---72.

14.KwakJY,HanKH,YoonJH,MoonHJ,SonEJ,ParkSH,et al. Thyroidimagingreportinganddatasystemfor usfeaturesof nodules:astepinestablishingbetterstratificationofcancer risk.Radiology.2011;260:892---9.

15.Shimura H, Haraguchi K, Hiejima Y, Fukunari N, Fujimoto Y, Katagiri M, et al. Distinct diagnostic criteria for ultra-sonographic examination of papillary thyroid carcinoma: a multicenterstudy.Thyroid.2005;15:251---8.

16.Park JY, Lee HJ, Jang HW, Kim HK, Yi JH, Lee W, et al. A proposalfor athyroidimagingreportingand datasystemfor ultrasoundfeatures of thyroid carcinoma. Thyroid.2009;19: 1257---64.

17.Haugen BR, Alexander EK, Bible KC, Doherty GM, Mandel SJ, Nikiforov YE, et al. 2015 American Thyroid Association ManagementGuidelines for adult patientswith thyroid nod-ulesanddifferentiatedthyroidcancer:TheAmericanThyroid AssociationGuidelinesTaskForceonThyroidNodulesand Dif-ferentiatedThyroidCancer.Thyroid.2016;26:1---133.

18.AsanumaK,KobayashiS,ShinguK,HamaY,YokoyamaS, Fuji-moriM,etal.Therateoftumourgrowthdoesnotdistinguish between malignant and benignthyroid nodules. Eur JSurg. 2001;167:102---5.

19.YoonJH, Kwon HJ, Kim EK,Moon HJ, KwakJY. The follicu-lar variantof papillarythyroid carcinoma: characteristicsof preoperative ultrasonography and cytology. Ultrasonography. 2016;35:47---54.

20.De Napoli L, Bakkar S, Ambrosini CE, Materazzi G, Proietti A, Macerola E, et al. Indeterminate single thyroid nodule: synergisticimpactofmutationalmarkersandsonographic fea-tures in triaging patients to appropriate surgery. Thyroid. 2016;26:390---4.

21.MoonHJ,KimEK,YoonJH,KwakJY.Malignancyrisk stratifica-tioninthyroidnoduleswithnondiagnosticresultsatcytologic examination: combination of thyroid imaging reporting and data systemand theBethesda System. Radiology. 2015;274: 287---95.

22.BaierND, HahnPF, GervaisDA,SamirA, HalpernEF,Mueller PR, et al. Fine-needle aspiration biopsy of thyroid nodules: experience in a cohort of 944 patients. Am J Roentgenol. 2009;193:1175---9.

23.KwongN, Medici M,AngellTE, LiuX,Marqusee E, CibasES, etal. theinfluenceofpatientageon thyroidnodule forma-tion,multinodularity,andthyroidcancerrisk.JClinEndocrinol Metab.2015;100:4434---40.

24.ButrosR,BoyvatF,OzyerU,BilezikciB,AratZ,AytekinC,etal. Managementofinfracentimetricthyroidnoduleswithrespect toultrasonographicfeatures.EurRadiol.2007;17:1358---64.

25.CappelliC,CastellanoM,Pirola I,GandossiE,DeMartino E, CumettiD,etal. Thyroidnoduleshapesuggests malignancy. EurJEndocrinol.2006;155:27---31.

26.Iannuccilli JD, Cronan JJ, Monchik JM. Risk for malig-nancy of thyroid nodules as assessed by sonographic

(8)

criteria: the need for biopsy. J Ultrasound Med. 2004;23: 1455---64.

27.Tomimori EK, Bisi H, Medeiros-Neto G, Camargo RY. Ultra-sonographic evaluation of thyroid nodules: comparison with cytologicandhistologicdiagnosis.ArqBrasEndocrinolMetabol. 2004;48:105---13.

28.LinJH,ChiangFY,LeeKW,Ho KY,KuoWR.Theroleofneck ultrasonographyinthyroidcancer.AmJOtolaryngol.2009;30: 324---6.

29.Andrioli M, Carzaniga C, Persani L. standardized ultrasound reportforthyroidnodules:theendocrinologist’sviewpoint.Eur ThyroidJ.2013;2:37---48.

Referências

Documentos relacionados

Recently, data reporting systems for thyroid lesions, such as the Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (TI-RADS) and American Thyroid Association (ATA), which stratifies the

Incidental thyroid cancer; benign thyroid disease; multinodular goiter; total thyroidectomy; papillary thyroid

Na comparação entre modais nota-se que o modal marítimo, ou seja, a cabotagem apresenta mais vantagens do que os outros modais, pois todos ganham com isso, desde o governo que possui

Finalmente, da análise da posição da disciplina de Criminologia nas estruturas curriculares de dezenove Faculdades de Direito, surge uma visão otimista, dada a constatada aceitação

A contribuição feita por este trabalho é a de fornecer um mecanismo que permite resolver problemas refinando a especificação até se obter todos os elementos necessários para

A mercadoria é, antes de tudo, um objeto externo, uma coisa, qual pelas suas propriedades satisfaz necessidades humanas de qualquer espécie. A natureza

Com os dados disponibilizados nesta pesquisa percebe-se que alguns dados especialmente importantes no exercício profissional, que seria a relação interpessoal entre

O presente trabalho tem por finalidade determinar a quantidade de água envolvida na produção de leite na ilha do Faial, examinando a sua evolução ao longo do tempo e tendo em conta