!
!
" # $
%& %& '
()*+ , - . / % 0 1 2
" #
3 !45
6 %(7 - * 89 ):
, . : ; 8 7 *: - %& : - < )7 ' : - 3 0
3= + > ? $ : $
@A B :+ - %$ 6 72) ) C
E.subspherica
A, B
E.zuernii
/A@ B
E.bovis
DA, B
E.alabamensis
@ B
E.canadensis
,A / B
E.bukidnonensis
,A / B
E.ellipsoidalis
,A / B
E.cylindrica
A/@ B 8 7 : -<
3= *: E ; %$2 A/@
B :; <) 8 7 *: 3 !4
3= :* - % ;
A B 0 + F : $G - %$ H 8 7 *: 3: $ ,A
B DA/ B H ) E ; I
Diagnosis and classification of
Eimeria
species in cattle in Mosul
H. S. Al-Bakry
Department of Microbiology , College of Veterinary Medicine , University of Mosul , Mosul , Iraq
Abstract
Examining 140 fecal samples of cattle from different regions of Mosul showed that the total percentage of infection was
25.71% with the oocysts of Eimeria, and the species of Eimeria recovered were: E. subspherica (11.42%), E. zuernii (8.57%),
E. bovis (6.42%), E. alabamensis (5%), E. canadensis (4.28%), E. bakidnonensis (4.28%), E. ellipsoidalis (4.28%) and E. cylindrica (2.85%). The single infection with Eimeria constituted 12.85% of the animal infection. The incidence of infection was higher in cattle under the age of one year (30.92%) and the percentages of infection in both males and females of cattle were 24.13%, 26.82%, respectively.
Available online at http://www.vetmedmosul.org/ijvs
"
3 $J
K + > + - 0 + H
"G % L )7 H 2):+ * ! <
M K E ; N O ) %(7 - P G Q $ &) R %$2 " * " * - %$2 > F G 0 + ): ):
+ ?: : 8 7
I
% *) ) @
; : K0 + HK F ) +
-# *) :+ %$ ? - K; : ; >
E. zuernii
E. bovis
O -" K % !K*+ (OK ) 2 S
bloody diarrhea
, I
K + ?: : 8 7
-> - 0 + 3+(* T H F
H F T9 2
9 :* *
U: + ) HK E) > F % *)
H & 7 :* - 3 "5 H P G$ Q :* * - *) 0 I
KR ; H) 0 + % ; H F T9 2 > -D
0 + H S F !2
-K KO$ KR ; H)
- ):* I
F .
K 9( L K4 K) :; >
? $ O 9 Q % ; ) O )
& ,
I 2 @ D E
-Q K K V Q +
> F H ! # )
I
% 3 * - P :R
?: : 8 7 O
K; 3 K!4 % L )7 H 0 + H +
#*: < )7 8 7
3K Q K ) 3 K + H< ) <)
> H 0 + H + : % 3 *
' : %O
Wisconsin Iowa
Illinois Montana
*: 3= G
: $ 8 7
' : NGR H + ?:
, A B
DA B /@ B D,A B H ) E ; I
F % *) ) : H
D
- :
K +
HK
0 + *:
B , AD B
#K K0 -K %$ H
% @
K ) K) 0 * $ H
-KKK %KKK$ 8KKK 7
E.aubarnensis E.bovis
E.cylindrica E.ellipsoidalis
E.subspherica
E.wyomingensis E.zuerni
8 7 -<
%$2
3= *: E ; ,A
B I
% K 3 K* -K 3 0 ' H
3 K: LK )7 H + ?: : 8 7 O
= H< T *K K$G
; K:
-E.bovis,
E.zuernii
K0 + H 2): 3 $+ : O$ - R
- K7 H* + % * %& H ? ,
K:O
2; - ; : +
!4 %& H 0 + % ; H
- %$
E.bovis E.cylindrica
E.zuerni
8 7 #*:
3= <) , A@
B ,A@ B A B H ) E ; I
: K K0 + & M E ; S *) > =
?:K K!) (; P GK$ ;+ L )7 H + ?:
HK K* NGR 3 8 7 : : ) T
-%& : I
$ % &
T )
, K0 + 0)*K -K . : ; Q K2
7)* G - Q )< & 7 L <$ /
K !: K =
!2 5 / H ) E<2)* E Q 3+
-" # $ H
W < )7 ' : - %&
%& : H
- K %$ ?: ; ) )
3K 0:
3 : $ H 3 < )7 E " #
W
(O H 34< %& ,
!&K - X I
6K K)
" $*K % K LK ) :0) 7)* . 3 : ;
Sheather's sugar–solution
@ I
P G + > ? $ : L :&) H );+ ) ? $ ? $2 3 <& E ; );+ > K
HK: ? K 0 7)*
ocular micrometer
,
D I " $ T 7)* 9 & 89 ): % ) ) /
I
'%
3:
? $ : $ 8 7 *: - E * 89 ):
>
Eimeria
3: $ @A
B 6 72) * NGR H )
+ - : : O
K& < 0 + . 3 : ; H
% < )7 8 7 #*: :+
-E.subspherica
E.zuernii E.bovis
. K H ; 2 O$+ HR 3: $
3K= 8 7 #*: 0 + A,
B /A@ B DA, B
H ) E ; I
3= *: E ; %$2 < 8 7 :
-A/@ B : 3= - H
Y . 8 7 *
K0 - ; :
O$ O(O :+ 8 7 A ,
B @A B H ) E ;
8 7 : - " : ' ; 4 ( T
%
I
% C :5 ? $5 H &72 + > ,
: ; . J 0 & <
:
3+ ;
7 *: 8
B
E.subspherica
D A,
E.zuernii
/A@
E.bovis
DA,
E.alabamensis
@
E.canadensis
D ,A /
E.bukidnonesis
D ,A /
E.ellipsoidalis
D ,A /
E.cylindrica
, A/@
LK& ) + > ? $ : ? ) 0
; );+ :+ NGR E
, D
H ZS $
% %$2
I
% C
8 7 :
:[ + ?: H &72
3 : ; .
J & < 0
8 7 :
; 3 : 8 7 *:
B
< /
A/@
Y . A ,
O(O )7 :5
5 O$5 /
@A
8 7 *: 3 !4 :[
? $5 <) + >
3= 8 7 *: :* - % ; :; A
B K:; !
; \
3= 8 7 *: :* @A
IB - K H
; :; 8 7 *: 3= \
; :* :*
O$[
A/ B A, B :; H ) E ; 89 ): % )
9 & ]
; 4
Q 2 (;
K ; 8K 7 *K: - K
3 :
% H ZS $
, 5 (; 67 ; 4 0 - ?: 3 < NG! 8 7 *:
$G - 8 7 *: H " : ' F :]
0 J *:
-8 7 ? $[ >
H 3= +
F :] 0 J DA/ B
$G H 0 J
3= ,A B
% K H ZS $
@ I
% C + :+ > ? $+ 3 * 0 3 <& &72
H . 3 : ; 0 +
& <
: KKKK
% M
% ^ >
- $ #
= $2
KK % K
KK K
-E.subspherica
,A@ ^ AD
DAD ^ A/ @A/ " $
-H R
- ;
E.zuernii
A, ^ @A@
,AD DA ^ A A/ " $
" $ -# 2 <&
E.bovis
A ^ AD
@A, _ ,A/ ^ /A/ A
` " S
E # S H: S7+
-E.alabamensis
DA, ^ A/
, , ^ @A/ %$2 " O $
- ;
E.canadensis
,A ^ DA /
DA@ ^ ,AD `
H R
E # S H: <&+
-E.bukidnonesis
, A, ^ A@
@AD _ @/A ^ @A , A/ `
" O $ " S -$ H: <&
E.ellipsoidalis
A ^ ,
,A @AD ^ A@ /
H R
" $ # 2 <&
E.cylindrica
@A ^ ,A
A/ A/ ^ A/ / H: *
- ;
% , C 8 7 *: ? $[
+ > #*
;
0 J
KK
3 : ;
& < ;
3 : 8 7 *:
B
:* - % ,
A
\ :* ,
@ A/
\ :* @A
:* O$[ ,
A,
, D
@A %
@ C 8 7 *: ? $[
?: #* + >
-?:
3 : ;
& <
3 : ;
*: 8 7 B
$G @/
, ,A
F : /
DA/
, D
%$2 C 0 + . H &72 + : >
A
a
E.bukidnonensis
B
a
E.zuernii
C
a
E.canadensis
I
" (
3 25
K $ 8K 7 *: - E * 89 ):
3= + > ? $
@A B %K HR *: NGR
- 7 H* + - %$ U * ,
T * %& H
= H @
K) - K HK : # V % 2 H
3 K + ) ' : > H < )7 8 7 #*: % *) Q ) , A B DA B /@ B D,A B /
K 0 # : ' : > H P G$ B
@ B @ B
$G ?: > ? $ : 8 7 *:
-$ +
$ - 2 ' : H <)
-2 - H *
: K 8 7 F *:
-- b )) + ?:
,/ B
F H 8 7
-: H L 7 L & %& !: H I
-5
T + ?: : 8 7 #*: H - )
; E ; : % ; %O U*<: - ' ) !: Q ; % > K + > - & E S ?:
- K $ KS + % %O ! + % ; E US )
T c : % $ 9 % S O )) 8 7 *:
? $ E; F ) M * H =
) >
Q + #K ) d K ) ; F 9( L 4
8 7 F H !
D I
6 72) * NGR H ) /
> K ? K $ - :
HK - O K -K ; 0 0 + . H +
: K K< )7 8 7 #*: : ) ; % L )7 + ?:
- 7 H* + 2 G
, 6 72) E
: - $G %& H + - ; :
E.bovis
K
3= *: E ; %$2 , A@
B - ; : N()
E.cylindriaca
E.zuerni
*: 3= G ,A@
B A B H ) E ;
% * 0
$ H + - :
K
* D
K0 HK + - :
#KK I KK25 KK0 -5
KK:J
E.zuerni
E.ellpsoidalis E.bovis
) :J K0 + H 9 2
0 # : ' : > H I
K: H @
K) P GK$
6 72KK) D
HKKR KK + -KK KK:
E.bovis
E.auburnensis E.zuerni
E.ellipsoidalis
E.subspherica E.cylindrica
$G , ; K:
-E.zuerui E.bovis
O$5 - R :J
HK KS
KK0 + I KK2 KK $ : KK 8KK 7 *KK:
-E.alabamensis
E %&) IB
3 !45 - * 89 ):
%$2 < 8 7 : E ;5
3= *:
A/@ B GR
'<) N 5 H* + - %$ - 7e
, I
- $
3 * - P :R
3 25 E ] -5
8 7 :
O$[
-- -- ; : :5
LK )7 HK T9 2K :K R +
3 : I
8 7 *: 3= 0 :[
; :; + ?:
%K
:* -A
B ; \
:* A/ B ;
\ :* @A B ; :* O$[ A, B 'K<) GR
N T
D % ; H 8 7 *: -K0 J
- K$)
- H <) 25
HK F 3 $+
-- O$ R ; H) 3 : T9 2 - $ > - :*
- K R ; b ) H) % H F
T K*5 _
D
5
- !2
0 J > )) E ] !S ) :; 8 7 F E ]
O 9
? $[ V ) >
I K$G -5
8K 7
H F H ; - $
;J - H Q =&
25 %K$
A
B
-, @ -5
! # + - ;
HK
8 7 F I - H 25 ) ) > F Q 2
-> ? $ ' ) !: Q ; % ; E ; QG 7[
-K - ; E ; P G$ + : - %
U ; : )
S] E ]
T H F > - P G
3+(* 0 J
% ; -0 J
K:; 8 7 ! *)$ 5 )
H; !9 !
I
K0 - K ?:K 8 7 *: (; 67 5
*: H " : ' ; T 0) *: 3 !4
$G - 8 7 F :]
0 J - ; N 5 T '<) GR
F *: H " : ' + U:[ - O 8K 7
K F K: $G - %$ - 3 : F :] $G -O[)) 8K 7) K0 J - 8K 7 F H " *) %$2
O 9 ! )) :; H < ? $[
; - >
)) + > ? $5 d ) +]
K! R5 Q K ; %K ; )
Q - *$ J
@
#K K $ Q K ; EK 0) $2 % . U )
HKK ! ; KK %KK& KK HKK " KK * NGR . : I
1. Kennedy M J. Coccidiosis in Cattle. Practical Information for Alberta's Agriculture Industry. 2007
2. Laven R, Nadis Cattle Disease Focus , Coccidiosis in Cattle. 2002. 3. Soulsby EJL. Helminths.Arthopods and Protozoa of Domesticated
Animals , 7th ed. Bailliera. Tindall , London , 1986 ;607-614. 4. Urquhart G M , Armour J , Duncan J L , et al. Veterinary
Parasitology. 2nd ed. , Black Well , Great Britian , 2003 ; 231.
5. Ramisz A B , Ramis Z A. Studies on coccidiosis in cattle in North – West Poland , Electronic Journal of polish Agricultural Universities, 2000 ; 3 (1) : 1505-0297
6. Cornelissen AWCA , Verstegen R , Brand HVD , et al. An observational study of Eimeria species in housed cattle on Dutch dairy farms , Elsevier Science B.V. 2000. Online
7. Boughton DC , Bovine coccidiosis from carrier to clinical case. North Am Vet 1945 : 147
8. Zimmerman WJ , Hubbard ED. Gastrointestinal parasitism in low cattle. JAVMA, 1961 ; 134 : 555.
9. Szanto J , Mohan LVP , Levine ND. Prevalence of Coccidia and gastrointestinal nematodes in beef cattle in Illinois and their relation to shipping fever. JAVMA. 1964 ; 144 : 741.
10. Jacobson PR , Mansficld ME. Effects of bovine coccidiosis on certain blood components , feed consumption and body weight changes of calves. Am J Vet Res 1972 ; 33 (7) : 1391 -1397. 11. Kasim AA , Shawa YR. Prevalence of Eimeria in faeces of cattle in
Saudi Arabia , Elsevier Science B.V. 2002 (Online).
12. Sabaa MA. Studying epidemiology of intestinal protazoa of buffaloes in Baghdad area. M.Sc. Thesis , University of Baghdad.College of Veterinary Medicine. 1989 : 76 – 78
13. Mirza YM. Incidence and distribution of coccidia (sporozoa : Eimeriidae) in mammals from Baghdad area. M.Sc. Thesis. University of Baghdad. College of Veterinary Medicine. 1970 : 55-68
14. Al-Alousi TI , Al-ani AJ , Al-Bayati MM. Epidemiological study of coccidiosis (Eimeria spp) in calves in Mosul. Iraqi J Vet Sci. 1993 ; 2 : 39- 41
15. Kassai T , Veterinary Helminthology , Great Britian , Bath press , 1999 , pp 186.
16. Foreyt WJ. Veterinary Parasitology , Reference mannul , 5th ed. ,
United State of America , 2001 ; pp 69
17. Bowman P , Wight D. Georgi's Parasitology for Veterinarian's 9th ed. , Saunders , 2003 , pp : 328.
18. Bruning LJ, Kintz BL. Computational hand book statistics , 2nd ed. Scott foresman and company, England, 1977 ; pp.233-237. 19. Matjila PT , Penzhorn BL. Occurrence and Diversity of bovine
coccidia at Three Localities in South Africa , Elsevier Science B.V. 2002 (Online)
20. Wacker K , Roffeis M , Conraths , FJ Cow. Calf herds in eastern Germany : Status Quo of some parasite species and comparison of chemoprophylaxis and pasture management in the control of Gastrointestinal nematodes. Journal of Vet. M. series B. 1999 ; 46 (7) : 475 – 483.
21. Dege'r S, Gul A. The prevalence and distribution of Eimeria species found in sheep in Van. Turk J Vet Anim. 2002 , 26 : 859-864. 22. Khalil NA. Coccidiosis in Buffaloes in Mosul , Iraq , Iraqi J Vet Sci
,1997 ;
10(1) : 18-21.
23. Ali MM , Suliman EG , Mahmood AF , Comparison study for incidence of Eimeria spp and cryptosporidium spp, in sheep between Mosul and Kirkuk. J Dohuk Univ. 2005. 8(2) : 175-179.
24. Al-Bakri H S. Parasitic protozoa Eimeria and cryptosporidium in goats in Ninevah province , M. Sc. Thesis. University of Mosul , College of Vet. Med. , 2002. pp.37.
