w w w . r b o . o r g . b r
Original
Article
Anatomical
study
of
the
posterior
cruciate
ligament
with
the
knee
flexed
at
90
◦
夽
,
夽夽
Daniel
Kyubin
Cho,
Sthéphano
Pellizzaro
Rosa,
Guilherme
Bello
Prestes,
Luiz
Antônio
Munhoz
da
Cunha,
Márcio
Fernando
Aparecido
de
Moura,
Edmar
Stieven
Filho
∗UniversidadeFederaldoParaná(UFPR),Curitiba,PR,Brazil
a
r
t
i
c
l
e
i
n
f
o
Articlehistory:
Received15July2013 Accepted20August2013 Availableonline27August2014
Keywords:
Posteriorcruciateligament Anatomy
Cadaver
a
b
s
t
r
a
c
t
Objective:Tostudytheanatomyoftheposteriorcruciateligament(PCL)anddefine anatom-icalparameterswiththekneeflexedat90◦.
Methods:Eightkneesfromcadaversweredissectedinordertomakemeasurementsfromthe centeroftheanterolateralbandtotheroof(AL1),fromthecenteroftheanterolateralband totheanteriorcartilage(AL2),fromthecenteroftheposteromedialbandtotheroof(PM1), fromthecenteroftheposteromedialbandtotheanteriorcartilage(PM2),fromthecenter ofthetibialinsertiontothemedialregionofthetibia(TIM),fromthecenterofthetibial insertiontothelateralregionofthetibia(TIL),fromthecenterofthemedialinsertiontothe medialmeniscus(IMM)andthewidthoftheoriginofthePCL(WO).Toobtaintheresults fromeachanatomicalstructure,themeansandstandarddeviationsofthemeasurements werecalculated.
Results:ThemeasurementsinmillimetersthatwerefoundwereAL1,6.2;AL2,4.9;PM1,11.7; PM2,5.5;TIM,32.5;TIL,40.6;IMM,9.4;andWO,32.5.
Conclusions:ThePCLhasanextensiveorigin.Thecenteroftheanterolateralbandis6mm fromtheroofand5mmfromtheanteriorcartilageoftheknee.Thetibialinsertionisslightly medialand10mmdistaltotheposteriorcornuofthemedialmeniscus.
©2014SociedadeBrasileiradeOrtopediaeTraumatologia.PublishedbyElsevierEditora Ltda.Allrightsreserved.
Estudo
anatômico
do
ligamento
cruzado
posterior
com
o
joelho
em
90
◦de
flexão
Palavras-chave:
Ligamentocruzadoposterior
r
e
s
u
m
o
Objetivo:Estudara anatomiadoligamentocruzadoposterior(LCP)edefinir parâmetros anatômicoscomojoelhoem90◦deflexão.
夽
Pleasecitethisarticleas:ChoDK,RosaSP,PrestesGB,daCunhaLAM,deMouraMFA,StievenFilhoE.Estudoanatômicodoligamento cruzadoposteriorcomojoelhoem90◦deflexão.RevBrasOrtop.2014;49(5):494–8.
夽夽
WorkdevelopedintheBiologicalSciencesSector,UniversidadeFederaldoParaná(UFPR),Curitiba,PR,Brazil.
∗ Correspondingauthor.
E-mail:[email protected],[email protected](E.StievenFilho).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rboe.2014.08.003
Anatomia Cadáver
Métodos: Oitojoelhosdecadáveresforamdissecadosparatirarasmedidasdocentroda bandaanterolateralaoteto(AL1),docentrodabandaanterolateralàcartilagemanterior (AL2),docentrodabandaposteromedialaoteto(PM1),docentrodabandaposteromedial àcartilagemanterior(PM2),docentrodainserc¸ãotibialàregiãomedialdatíbia(ITM),do centroda inserc¸ãotibialàregiãolateraldatíbia(ITL),docentroda inserc¸ãomedialao meniscomedial(IMM)edalarguradaorigemdoLCP(LO).Paraaobtenc¸ãodosresultados decadaestruturaanatômicaforamcalculadososvaloresdemédiaedesviopadrãodas medic¸ões.
Resultados: Asmedidas,emmilímetros,encontradasforamAL1,6,2;AL2,4,9;PM1,11,7; PM2,5,5;ITM,32,5;ITL,40,6;IMM,9,4;eLO,32,5.
Conclusões: OLCPtemumaorigemextensa.Ocentrodabandaanterolateralficaa6mm dotetoea5mmdacartilagemanteriordojoelho.Ainserc¸ãotibialficalevementemediale 10mmdistalaocornoposteriordomeniscomedial.
©2014SociedadeBrasileiradeOrtopediaeTraumatologia.PublicadoporElsevier EditoraLtda.Todososdireitosreservados.
Introduction
Theposteriorcruciateligament(PCL)isoneofthestatic sta-bilizersoftheknee.Itprovidesprimaryrestraintinrelationto posteriordisplacementofthetibiaandsecondaryrestraintin relationtovarus,valgusandexternalrotation.1
Controversy continues regarding the treatment for PCL injuries.2Thereisinsufficientdataintheliteraturetobeable
to standardize the indication.3 Someauthors have
recom-mendedreconstructionofthePCLinpatientswithmorethan 10mmofposteriordisplacementwhopresentcomplaintsof painandinstabilityandwhodonotimprovewith conserva-tivetreatment.2,4Thisrecommendationisbasedonthefact
that75%oftheresultsfromPCLreconstructionaregood.5
Notechniquepresentingprecisionandreproducibilityfor guidingtunnelpositioninginPCLreconstructionhasyetbeen developed.Thismaybebecausemoststudieshavebeen con-ductedwiththekneeintheanatomicalposition(extension), whereasthesurgicalprocedureisperformedwiththeknee flexed.6–8Theaimofthisstudywasanalyzetheanatomyof
thePCLanddefineobjectiveanatomicalparameterswiththe kneeflexedat90◦.
Materials
and
methods
Eightknees from cadavers were dissectedwith the aimof studying the anatomy and making measurements on the structuresandanatomicalrelationshipsofthePCL.
Asaninclusioncriterion,weselectedkneesfrom cadav-erswithintactkneestructures,includingthejoint capsule, withoutanypreviousarthrotomy.Allthekneeshadbeen con-servedinformol.
Tomakemeasurements,40×12needleswereusedtomark
outspecificpointsandthenanAeroSpace®metalpachymeter
(150mm)wasused.
Thefollowingmeasurementsweremade:
• centeroftheanterolateralbandtotheroof(Fig.1); • center ofthe anterolateralband totheanterior cartilage
(Fig.1);
• centeroftheposteromedialbandtotheroof(Fig.1); • centeroftheposteromedialbandtotheanteriorcartilage
(Fig.1);
• centerofthetibialinsertiontothemedialregionofthetibia
(Fig.2);
• centerofthetibialinsertiontothelateralregionofthetibia
(Fig.2);
• center of the medial insertion to the medial meniscus
(Fig.2);
• widthoftheoriginofthePCL(Fig.3).
Oneofthemeasurementswasthewidthoftheoriginof thePCL.Thiswasmeasuredwiththeaidofacoloredstring, whichwaslaidalongtheentirelengthoftheligament(Fig.3).
Results
Themeansandstandarddeviations(SD)resultingfrom the measurements on the PCLatthe femoral origin and tibial insertionarepresentedinTables1and2.
Discussion
Most studies havemeasured the cruciate ligaments in the anatomicalposition,i.e.withthekneeextended.These mea-surementshavebeenbasedonthesagittalview,withremoval ofthefemoralcondyle.8Inthepresentstudy,theanatomical
measurementsweremadewiththekneeflexedat90◦,with
the intentionofincreasingtheapplicability ofthe studyto arthroscopicprocedures.6Evenwithsimilarmeasurements,
the resultsmay showdiscrepanciesifobtainedindifferent manners.7,8
ThePCLoriginatesfromalargeareaofthemedialfemoral condyle and isinserted ina depression betweenthe tibial plateauscalledthefossaofthePCL.1Itisslightlymedialto
theimaginaryaxisofkneerotation.9Theresultsfrom
anatom-icalstudiesonthetibialinsertionofthePCLcorroboratethis affirmation.Lorenzetal.10foundthecenterofthetibial
Fig.1–Measurementsfromthefemoraloriginoftheposteriorcruciateligament.AL1:centeroftheanterolateralbandto theroof;AL2:centeroftheanterolateralbandtotheanteriorcartilage;PM1:centeroftheposteromedialbandtotheroof; PM2:centeroftheposteromedialbandtotheanteriorcartilage.
studydemonstratedanevenmoremedialposition,withthe centerofthePCLinthetibiaat40.6mmfromthelateraledge and32.5mmfromthemedialedge.
Girgisetal.11 evaluatedthelengthofthefemoralorigin
ofthePCLand arrivedatavalueof32mm.Theymadethe
Fig.2–Measurementsfromthefemoraloriginofthe posteriorcruciateligament.TIL:centerofthetibial
insertiontothelateralregionofthetibia;TIM:centerofthe tibialinsertiontothemedialregionofthetibia;IMM:center ofthemedialinsertiontothemedialmeniscus.
measurement as a straight line between the two furthest extremitiesandneglecteditsovalformat.Inthepresentstudy, the measurement was made ina similar manner, but the half-circumferencewasevaluatedandavalueof28.6mmwas obtained.
Thegreatextentoftheoriginmeansthatthefibersofthe PCLbehavedifferentlyaccordingtothedegreeofknee flex-ion. Thus, therewill alwaysbe somefibers under tension, independentofthepositionoftheknee. Thisphenomenon wasanalyzedbackinthe1970s,but inadescriptionofthe PCLasasinglestructure.11Studiesconductedmorerecently
haveseparatedthePCLintotwobands:theanterolateralband
Table1–Meansandstandarddeviations(SD)ofthePCL measurementsatthefemoralorigin.
Values WO AL1 AL2 PM1 PM2
Mean 28.6 6.2 4.9 11.7 5.5
SD 1.7 1.2 1.1 2 1.2
WO,widthatorigin;AL1,centeroftheanterolateralbandtothe roof;AL2,centeroftheanterolateralbandtotheanteriorcartilage; PM1,centeroftheposteromedialbandtotheroof;PM2,centerof theposteromedialbandtotheanteriorcartilage.
remainstenseduringflexionandtheposteromedial,during extension.12
Theovaloriginmeasuring30mmmakesreproductionin surgicalproceduresdifficult.Oneofthe proposalsfor com-ingclosertothe originalanatomyhasbeen toperformthe reconstructionasadoubleband.Nonetheless,although dou-blebandsdemonstrategreaterinvitrostability,clinicalstudies havenotdemonstratedanyadvantagesincomparisonwith single bands.8 Even some biomechanical studies have not
foundanydifferencebetweenthetwotechniques,especially inclinicalanalyses.13
There were five studies in the literature, in which the methodologyenabledcomparisonswithsomeoftheresults fromthepresentstudy.Thedistancefromthecenterofthe anterolateralbandtotheroofwasfoundtorangefrom13to 4.8mm.Inthepresentstudy,thisdistancewas6.2.The dis-tancefromtheposteromedialbandtotheroofrangedfrom20 to11.4mm.Inthepresentstudy,itwas11.7.8,14–16Differences
ofthistypebetweenstudiesare common,becausetheyare absolutemeasurementsandareinfluencedbytheevaluator, thesampleandthematerialusedforcollection.
Regardingthemeasurementsfromthecenterofthebands totheanteriorcartilage,therewasadiscrepancyinrelationto thedatafoundintheliterature.Thedistancefromthe antero-lateralbandtotheanteriorcartilagerangedfrom13to7mm. Inthepresentstudy,thisdistancewas4.9.Forthe posterome-dialband,therangewasfrom10.6to8mm.Thevaluefound was5.5.8,14–16Onepossibilityforthisdifference,inadditionto
thoseputforwardintheaboveparagraph,wasundervaluation ofHamphey’sligament.
Thearthroscopicreferencepointsfordeterminingthe posi-tionofthePCLareasourceofconfusionintheliterature.One ofthemethodsusedhasbeenaclock-facemethod.However, studieshaveshownthatthereisimprecisioninreproducing thistechnique.Insomecases,differencesofmorethanone hourwerefoundintheevaluationsbetweenobservers.17,18
Table2–Meansandstandarddeviations(SD)ofthePCL measurementsatthetibialinsertion.
Values TIM TIL IMM
Mean 32.5 40.6 9.4
SD 3.5 4.4 2.3
TIM,centerofthetibialinsertiontothemedialregionofthetibia; TIL,centerofthetibialinsertiontothelateralregionofthetibia; IMM,centerofthemedialinsertiontothemedialmeniscus.
Anothermethodusedconsistsofatabulatedguide.Thisis usefulforguidingthetunnelsonlateralimages.Thismethod standardizestheindividualizationofthebandsandtheir posi-tionsinrelationtothesizeoftheknee.Thismethodshould perhapsbethestandardfornavigatedsurgery,sinceitis math-ematicallymoreprecise.Ontheotherhand,forapplicationto conventionalarthroscopicsurgery,itisverylimited.18
Evenwithalltheseparameters,somedecisionsregarding thepositioningofthetunnelduringthesurgery,inrelationto boththejointfaceandthetunneldirection,aredependenton thesurgeon’ssubjectivechoicesandtheparticularfeaturesof thecaseoperated.
Conclusions
ThePCLhasanextensiveorigin.Thecenterofthe anterolat-eralbandis6mmfromtheroofand5mmfromtheanterior cartilageoftheknee.Thetibialinsertionisslightlymedialand 10mmdistaltotheposteriorcornuofthemedialmeniscus.
Conflicts
of
interest
Theauthorsdeclarenoconflictsofinterest.
r
e
f
e
r
e
n
c
e
s
1.FanelliGC,BeckJD,EdsonCJ.Currentconceptsreview:the posteriorcruciateligament.JKneeSurg.2010;23(2):61–72.
2.MontgomerySR,JohnsonJS,McAllisterDR,PetriglianoFA. SurgicalmanagementofPCLinjuries:indications,techniques, andoutcomes.CurrRevMusculoskeletMed.2013;6(2):115–23.
3.PeccinMS,AlmeidaGJM,AmaroJ,CohenM,SoaresBGO, AtallahAN.Interventionsfortreatingposteriorcruciate ligamentinjuriesofthekneeinadults.CochraneDatabase SystRev.2005;18(2):CD002939.
4.CamargoOPA,ChameckiA.Lesãodoligamentocruzado posterior:incidênciaetratamento.RevBrasOrtop. 1996;31(6):491–6.
5.KimYM,LeeCA,MatavaMJ.Clinicalresultsofarthroscopic single-bundletranstibialposteriorcruciateligament reconstruction:asystematicreview.AmJSportsMed. 2011;39(2):425–34.
6.Stieven-FilhoE,GarschagenET,NambaM,SilvaJLV,Malafaia O,CunhaLAM.Estudoanatômicodasduasbandasdo ligamentocruzadoanteriorcomojoelhoem90odeflexão.
RevColBrasCir.2011;38(5):338–42.
7.JohannsenAM,AndersonCJ,WijdicksC,EngebretsenL, LaPradeRF.Radiographiclandmarksfortunnelpositioningin posteriorcruciateligamentreconstructions.AmJSportsMed. 2013;41(1):35–42.
8.AndersonCJ,ZieglerCG,WijdicksCA,EngebretsenL,Laprade RF.Arthroscopicallypertinentanatomyoftheanterolateral andposteromedialbundlesoftheposteriorcruciate ligament.JBoneJointSurgAm.2012;94(21):1936–45.
9.CuryRPL,SeverinoNR,CamargoOPA,AiharaT,BatistaNeto LV,GoarayebDN.Estudoanatômicodainserc¸ãofemoraldo ligamentocruzadoposterior.RevBrasOrtop.2011;46(5):591–5.
11.GirgisFG,MarshallJL,MonajemA.Thecruciateligamentsof thekneejoint.Anatomical,functionalandexperimental analysis.ClinOrthopRelatRes.1975;(106):216–31.
12.AmisAA,GupteCM,BullMJ,EdwardsA.Anatomyofthe posteriorcruciateligamentandthemeniscofemoral ligaments.KneeSurgSportsTraumatolArthrosc. 2006;14(3):257–63.
13.BergfeldJA,GrahamSM,ParkerRD,ValdevitADC,KambicHE. Abiomechanicalcomparisonofposteriorcruciateligament reconstructionsusingsingle-anddouble-bundletibialinlay techniques.AmJSportsMed.2005;33(7):976–81.
14.LopesOV,FerrettiM,ShenW,EkdahlM,SmolinskiP,FuFH. Topographyofthefemoralattachmentoftheposterior cruciateligament.JBoneJointSurgAm.2008;90(2): 249–55.
15.TakahashiM,MatsubaraT,DoiM,SuzukiD,NaganoA. Anatomicalstudyofthefemoralandtibialinsertionsofthe anterolateralandposteromedialbundlesofhumanposterior cruciateligament.KneeSurgSportsTraumatolArthrosc. 2006;14(11):1055–9.
16.MorganCD,KalmanVR,GrawlDM.Theanatomicoriginofthe posteriorcruciateligament:whereisit?Referencelandmarks forPCLreconstruction.Arthroscopy.1997;13(3):325–31.
17.ApsingiS,BullAM,DeehanDJ,AmisAA.Review:femoral tunnelplacementforPCLreconstructioninrelationtothe PCLfibrebundleattachments.KneeSurgSportsTraumatol Arthrosc.2009;17(6):652–9.