• Nenhum resultado encontrado

Int. braz j urol. vol.42 número4

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2018

Share "Int. braz j urol. vol.42 número4"

Copied!
1
0
0

Texto

(1)

858

EDITORIAL COMMENT

EDITORIAL COMMENT: LAPAROSCOPIC RADICAL NEPHRECTOMY WITH INFERIOR VENA CAVA THROMBEC-TOMY: HIGHLIGHT OF KEY SURGICAL STEPS

Philippe E. Spiess

1

1 Department of Urologic Oncology. H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center,Tampa, Florida, USA

In this video by Sim et al. (1), the authors nicely depict how laparoscopic surgery can be em-ployed to tackle locally advanced renal tumors with venous vascular extension. The authors are to be congratulated on their elegant approach to such a case resulting in minimal blood loss, enhanced perio-perative recovery, and most importantly strictly adhering to the essential principles of surgical oncology with complete tumor eradication. This being said, I would like to emphasize the last statement made by the authors in the their abstract which is that such an approach should be conducted in only highly selected cases at centers of excellence. I think low level IVC tumor thrombi (Mayo classification level 1 and 2) maybe appropriate to address in this manner in specific instances but tumor thrombi exhibiting intrahepatic or intracardiac extension (level 3 and 4, respectively) should be empirically approached using an open approach although some recent reports have raised the potential of robotic minimally invasive surgery in very highly selected cases. One can never forget the inherent morbidity associated with such high level IVC tumor thrombi cases, where the margin for error is infinitely small. Rapidly evolving technology will continually push the envelope as to how we perform surgery but the onus lies upon us as treating surgeons to always place the safety and wellbeing of our patients as the unwavering Hypocratic oath we will always adhere to.

REFERENCE

1. Sim A, Todenhöfer T, Mischinger J, Fahmy O, Boettge J, Rausch S, et al. Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy with inferior vena cava thrombectomy: highlight of key surgical steps. Int Braz J Urol. 2016;42:856-8.

Philippe E. Spiess, MD

Assistant Professor of Urologic Oncology H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center Tampa, Florida, USA E-mail: philippe.spiess@moffitt.org

Vol. 42 (4): 858-858, July - August, 2016

Referências

Documentos relacionados

Ac- cording to the EORTC risk table, using a scoring system based on previous recurrence rate, tumor number, tumor diameter, T category, World He- alth Organization (WHO) grade,

High-dose interleukin-2 for the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma : a retrospective analysis of response and survival in patients treated in the surgery branch at

The aim of our study was to compare the cancer detection rates of normal, asymmetric or suspicious prostate such as nodule in DRE by using TRUS guided prostate biopsy results of

Ultrasonography-guided percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the flank position versus fluoroscopy- guided percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the prone position: a comparative

We contend that if ultrasound needle guidance can be taught in a manner that is adoptable and fa- cilitates urologic trainee’s confidence in that skill set, they may be more likely

To as- sess urinary symptoms and pain associated with ureteral stent, patients were asked to complete the brief-form Chinese version USSQ 2 weeks and 4 weeks after stent

Data recorded for these patients included their maxi- mum pain score in the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU), average flow rate of irrigant used during the procedure, patient and

A randomized trial comparing holmium laser enucleation of the prostate with transurethral resection of the prostate for the treatment of bladder outlet obstruction secondary