Predicting ordered equilibrium structures for patchy particles
Gerhard Kahl
Institut für Theoretische Physik and CMS, Technische Universität Wien, Austria
MECO 36, Lviv, April 5 th – 10 th 2011
Outline
1 Introduction
2 Model and theoretical methods
3 Results
4 Summary & Outlook
Patchy particles
Patchy particles are ...
(spherical) colloidal particles decorated on their surface by mutually attractive/repuslvie regions (patches)
patches can be realized via
◦ areas of different physical/chemical properties (magnetic particles grafted to a colloid, hydrophobic regions, ...)
◦ grafted polymers, double- and single-stranded DNAs, ...
◦ ...
consequences:
highly orientational effective interactions between patchy particles
selective bonding between particles
potential for complex self-assembly scenarios
ideal building blocks of larger entities
Patchy particles: example no. 1
from: O.D. Velevet al., Macromol.31, 190 (2010)
Patchy particles: example no. 2
from: D.J. Kraft, J. Groenewold, W.K. Kegel, Soft Matter5, 3823 (2009)
Patchy particles: example no. 3
triblock Janus particles
experiment
Q. Chen, S.C. Bae, and S. Granick, Nature496, 381 (2011)
theory
from: F. Romano and F. Sciortino, Nat. Mater.10, 171 (2011)
Patchy particles: theoretical models
spot-like patches
E. Bianchi,et al., Phys. Rev. Lett.97, 168301 (2006)
polyelectrolyte stars adsorbed on a charged colloid
Registered Charity Number 207890
www.chemistryworldjobs.com Upload your CV and profile today!
Discover something NEW
Your NEW recruitment site dedicated to chemistry and the chemical sciences Create a free account to get the most from chemistryworldjobs.com
Get headhunted Create a profile and publish your CV so potential employers can discover you Stay ahead of your competition Set up your job alerts and receive relevant jobs in your inbox as soon as they appear Discover your next career move Detailed searches by role, salary and location Save time and be the first to apply Online vacancy application Be efficient Bookmark jobs that interest you, so you can come back to them later
%HGLVFRYHUHG
ISSN 1463-9076 Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics
www.rsc.org/pccp Volume 13 | Number 14 | 14 April 2011 | Pages 6373–6712
COVER ARTICLE Bianchi et al.
Patchy colloids: state of the art and perspectives
HOT ARTICLE Goerigk and Grimme A thorough benchmark of density functional methods for general main group thermochemistry, kinetics, and noncovalent interactions Downloaded on 23 March 2011Published on 14 April 2011 on http://pubs.rsc.org | doi:10.1039/C1CP90037D
View Online
microscopic model
coarse grained model
see also:E. Bianchi, R. Blaak, and C.N. Likos, PCCP63, 1397 (2011);
E. Bianchi, G.K., and C.N. Likos, Soft Matter (submitted)
Outline
1 Introduction
2 Model and theoretical methods
3 Results
4 Summary & Outlook
Model
interparticle potential (2D)
two interacting patchy particles
V = V (r
ij, Θ
iα, Θ
jβ)
J.P.K. Doye,et al., PCCP92197 (2007)
Theoretical methods – No. 1
goal:
predict ordered equilibrium configurations for the system i.e., configurations of minimum energy
ensemble:
NPT ensemble with (i) T = 0 and then (ii) T > 0 thus, minimizing Gibbs free energy leads to optimized
◦ lattice parameters
◦ equilibrium density (volume)
tools:
genetic algorithms
(Monte Carlo simulations)
Theoretical methods – No. 2
genetic algorithms – an efficient optimization tool
◦ very general optimisation strategies
◦ model natural evolutionary processes
(mutation, recombination, survival of the fittest)
◦ probe in an unbiased way the entire parameter space
◦ cope extremely well with rugged energy landscapes and high dimensional parameter spaces
idea:
1. treat any possible lattice structure as an individual 2. expose individual on the computer to an artifical evolution
condition for survival: minimize thermodynamic potential 3. mutation & recombination ⇒ large number of generations 4. ’in the end’ the ’fittest’ (i.e., energetically most favourable)
individual survies ⇒ ordered equilibrium structure
Theoretical methods – No. 3
Monte Carlo simulations
(a) NPT ensemble with variable cell geometry
◦ start from a random configuration
◦ vary temperature and/or pressure
◦ let particles find their energetically optimized arrangement (b) NPT ensemble & thermodynamic integration (Frenkel-Ladd)
⇒ thermodynamic properties at arbitrary T
Outline
1 Introduction
2 Model and theoretical methods
3 Results
4 Summary & Outlook
overview
1. self-assembly in two-dimensional systems
2. self-assembly in three-dimensional systems
3. formation of clusters
Results (2D) – No. 1
three-patch system
P = 0 . 5 P = 4 . 5
G. Doppelbauer, E. Bianchi, and G.K., JPCM22, 104105 (2009)
Results (2D) – No. 2
three-patch system
P = 0 . 5
P = 2 . 0
P = 4 . 0
P = 7 . 0
-2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 2 3 4 5 6
G⋆,U⋆,1/(ησ2)
P⋆ U⋆ 1/(ησ2) G⋆=U⋆+P⋆/(ησ2)
thermodynamics
Results (2D) – No. 3
four-patch system
P = 0 . 5
P = 0 . 5
P = 6 . 0
P = 2 . 5
Results (2D) – No. 4
five-patch system with attractive and repulsive patches
P = 0 . 5
P = 1 . 5
P = 4 . 0
P = 8 . 0
Results (3D) – No. 1
four-patch system
90 120 150
g
lattice sum (energy)
(pressure vs. patch decoration )
double layers
150 120
090 2 4 6 8 10
g
P★
-2.00 -0.90
-1.45
open
bcc-like I bcc-like II
fcc-like II
fcc-like I bct-like Ibcc-like III hcp-like I hexagonal layershcp-like III
fcc III
fct I fct-like II -like II
U
hcp hcp-like VI hcp-like V
bct-like II
Results (3D) – No. 2
four-patch system
90 120 150
g
equilibrium volume
(pressure vs. patch decoration )
double layers
150 120
090 2 4 6 8 10
g
P★
0.72 1.84
1.28
open
bcc-like I bcc-like II
fcc-like II
fcc-like I bct-like Ibcc-like III hcp-like I hexagonal layershcp-like III
fcc III
fct I fct-like II -like II
V
hcp hcp-like VI hcp-like V
bct-like II
Results (3D) – No. 3
configurations (in two perpendicular views)
90 120 150
g
g ∼ 95
olow-pressure phase
g ∼ 109
o(tetrahedral patch arrangement)
low-pressure phase
Results (3D) – No. 4
configurations (in two perpendicular views)
90 120 150
g
g ∼ 124
olow-pressure phase
high-pressure phase
g ∼ 150
olow-pressure phase
high-pressure phase
Results (clusters) – No. 1
formation of clusters by patchy particles (tetrahedral symmetry) energies
Energy per particle
Energy
Number of particles
−1.6
−1.5
−1.4
−1.3
−1.2
−1.1
−1.0
−0.9
−0.8
−0.7
−0.6
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
cluster energies vs. cluster size
building entities
five-particle ring
six-particle ring
Results (clusters) – No. 2
disconnectivity graphs
−13 .0
−12.5
−12.0
−11.5
−11.0
−10.5
−10.0
−9.5
−9.0
−30.0
−29.0
−28.0
−27
.0
−26
.0
−25
.0
−24.0
n = 10 n = 20
D.J. Wales,Energy Landscapes(Cambridge, 2003)