REFERÊNCIAS
AZEVEDO NETO, R. M.; TEIXEIRA, L. A. Control of interceptive actions is based on expectancy of time to target arrival. Experimental Brain Research, v. 199, n. 2, p. 135–143, 2009.
BASTIN, J.; CRAIG, C.; MONTAGNE, G. Prospective strategies underlie the control of interceptive actions. Human Movement Science, v. 25, n. 6, p. 718–
732, 2006.
BENDA, R. N. Variabilidade e processo adaptativo na aquisição de habilidades motoras. 2001. Universidade de São Paulo, 2001.
BENDA, R. N. Sobre a natureza da aprendizagem motora: mudança e
estabilidade ... e mudança. Revista Brasileira de Educação Física e Esporte, v. 20, n. 5, p. 43–45, 2006.
BLASCHECK, T.; KURZHALS, K.; RASCHKE, M.; BURCH, M.; WEISKOPF, D.;
ERTL, T. State-of-the-art of visualization for eye tracking data. EuroVis, p. 63–
82, 2014.
BOSCO, G.; MONACHE, S. D.; LACQUANITI, F. Catching what we can’t see:
Manual interception of occluded fly-ball trajectories. Plos One, v. 7, n. 11, p.
e49381, 2012.
BRENNER, E.; SMEETS, J. B. J. How people achieve their amazing temporal precision in interception. Journal of Vision, v. 15, n. 3, p. 1–21, 2015.
BRENNER, E.; SMEETS, J. B. J.; DE LUSSANET, M. H. Hitting moving targets.
Continuous control of the acceleration of the hand on the basis of the target’s velocity. Experimental Brain Research, v. 122, n. 4, p. 467–474, 1998.
BRENNER, E.; VAN DAM, M.; BERKHOUT, S.; SMEETS, J. B. J. Timing the moment of impact in fast human movements. Acta Psychologica, v. 141, n. 1, p. 104–111, 2012.
BROUWER, A. M.; BRENNER, E.; SMEETS, J. B. Hitting moving objects: the dependency of hand velocity on the speed of the target. Experimental Brain Research, v. 133, n. 2, p. 242–8, 2000.
BROUWER, A. M.; BRENNER, E.; SMEETS, J. B. J. Hitting moving objects: is target speed used in guiding the hand? Experimental Brain Research, v. 143, p. 198–211, 2002.
CISEK, P. Internal models. In: BINDER, M. D.; HIROKAWA, N.; WINDHORST, U. (Ed.). Encyclopedia of Neuroscience. [s.l.] Springer, 2009. p. 2009–2012.
CORRÊA, U. C.; BARROS, J. A. D. C.; MASSIGLI, M.; GONÇALVES, L. A.;
TANI, G. A prática constante-aleatória e o processo adaptativo de
aprendizagem motora: efeitos da quantidade de prática constante. Revista Brasileira de Educação Física e Esporte, v. 21, n. 4, p. 301–314, 2007.
CORRÊA, U. C.; BENDA, R. N.; UGRINOWITSCH, H.; LUSTOSA DE
OLIVEIRA, D.; FREUDENHEIM, A. M.; TANI, G. Different faces of variability in the adaptive process of motor skill learning. Nonlinear Dynamics,
Psychology, and Life Sciences, v. 19, n. 4, p. 465–487, 2015.
CORREA, U. C.; TANI, G. Aparelho de timing coincidente em tarefas complexasSão Paulo, 2004. .
COUTO, C. R. Efeitos do nível de estabilização do desempenho na adaptação a perturbações imprevisíveis inseridas após o início do movimento. 2012. Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, 2012.
DAVIDS, K.; SALVESBERGH, G.; BENNETT, S. J.; VAN DER KAMP, J.
Interceptive actions in sport: information and movement. London:
Routledge, 2002.
DE LA MALLA, C.; LÓPEZ-MOLINER, J. Predictive plus online visual information optimizes temporal precision in interception. Journal of
Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, v. 41, n. 3, p. 1–10, 2015.
DESMURGET, M.; GRAFTON, S. Forward modeling allows feedback control for fast reaching movements. Trends in cognitive sciences, v. 4, n. 11, p. 423–
431, 2000.
DESMURGET, M.; PÉLISSON, D.; ROSSETTI, Y.; PRABLANC, C. From eye to hand: planning goal-directed movements. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, v. 22, n. 6, p. 761–788, 1998.
DESSING, J. C.; BULLOCK, D.; PEPER, C. L. E.; BEEK, P. J. Prospective control of manual interceptive actions: comparative simulations of extant and new model constructs. Neural Networks, v. 15, n. 2, p. 163–79, 2002.
DUBROWSKI, A.; CARNAHAN, H. Control strategies when intercepting slowly moving targets. Journal of Motor Behavior, v. 33, n. 1, p. 37–48, 2001.
DUBROWSKI, A.; LAM, J.; CARNAHAN, H. Target velocity effects on manual interception kinematics. Acta Psychologica, v. 104, n. 1, p. 103–118, 2000.
DUCHOWSKI, A. T. Eye tracking methodology: theory and practice.
London: Springer, 2007.
FLANAGAN, J. R.; WING, A. M. The role of internal models in motion planning and control: evidence from grip force adjustments during movements of hand-held loads. The Journal of Neuroscience, v. 17, n. 4, p. 1519–28, 1997.
FONSECA, F. D. S.; BENDA, R. N.; PROFETA, V. L. D. S.; UGRINOWITSCH, H. Extensive practice improves adaptation to unpredictable perturbations in a sequential coincident timing task. Neuroscience Letters, v. 517, n. 2, p. 123–
127, 2012.
FONSECA, F. S. Os efeitos do nível de estabilização do desempenho na adaptação a perturbações perceptivas imprevisíveis. 2009. Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, 2009.
GOODALE, M. A. Transforming vision into action. Vision Research, v. 51, n.
13, p. 1567–1587, 2011.
GOODALE, M. A. How (and why) the visual control of action differs from visual perception. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, v. 281, p. 01–09, 2014.
GOODALE, M. A.; HUMPHREY, G. K. The objects of action and perception.
Cognition, v. 67, p. 181–207, 1998.
GOODALE, M. A.; MILNER, A. D. Separate visual pathways for perception and action. Trends in Neurosciences, v. 15, n. 1, p. 20–25, 1992.
IMAMIZU, H.; KURODA, T.; MIYAUCHI, S.; YOSHIOKA, T.; KAWATO, M.
Modular organization of internal models of tools in the human cerebellum.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, v. 100, n. 9, p. 5461–5466, 2003.
IMAMIZU, H.; MIYAUCHI, S.; TAMADA, T.; SASAKI, Y.; TAKINO, R.; PÜTZ, B.;
YOSHIOKA, T.; KAWATO, M. Human cerebellar activity reflecting an acquired internal model of a new tool. Nature, v. 403, n. 6766, p. 192–195, 2000.
ITO, M. Control of mental activities by internal models in the cerebellum. Nature Reviews, v. 9, n. 4, p. 304–13, 2008.
KATSUMATA, H.; RUSSELL, D. M. Prospective versus predictive control in timing of hitting a falling ball. Experimental Brain Research, v. 216, n. 4, p.
499–514, 2012.
KAWATO, M. Internal models for motor control and trajectory planning. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, v. 9, p. 718–727, 1999.
KAWATO, M.; KURODA, T.; IMAMIZU, H.; NAKANO, E.; MIYAUCHI, S.;
YOSHIOKA, T. Internal forward models in the cerebellum: fMRI study on grip force and load force coupling. Progress in Brain Research, v. 142, p. 171–
188, 2003.
LA SCALEIA, B.; ZAGO, M.; LACQUANITI, F. Hand interception of occluded motion in humans: a test of model-based versus on-line control. Journal of Neurophysiology, v. 114, n. 3, p. 1577–1592, 2015.
LAND, M. F. Motion and vision: why animals move their eyes. Journal of Comparative Physiology, v. 185, n. 4, p. 341–352, 1999.
LAND, M. F. Vision, eye movements, and natural behavior. Visual Neuroscience, v. 26, n. 1, p. 51–62, 2009.
LAND, M. F.; MCLEOD, P. From eye movements to actions: how batsmen hit the ball. Nature Neuroscience, v. 3, n. 12, p. 1340–5, 2000.
LE RUNIGO, C.; BENGUIGUI, N.; BARDY, B. G. Perception-action coupling and expertise in interceptive actions. Human Movement Science, v. 24, n. 3, p. 429–445, 2005.
LEE, D.; PORT, L.; GEORGOPOULOS, A. P. Manual interception of moving targets. Experimental Brain Research, v. 116, p. 421–433, 1997.
LEE, T. D.; SWANSON, L. R.; HALL, A. L. What is repeated in a repetition?
Effects of practice conditions on motor skill acquisition. Physical Therapy, v.
71, n. 2, p. 150–156, 1991.
LEITE, C. M. F. Efeitos da organização da prática variada sobre a adaptação motora a perturbações previsíveis e imprevisíveis. 2014.
Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, 2014.
MANOEL, E. J. Desenvolvimento motor: implicações para a Educação Física Escolar I. Revista Paulista de Educação Física, v. 8, n. 1, p. 82–97, 1994.
MCLEOD, P. Visual reaction time and high-speed ball games. Perception, v.
16, n. 1, p. 49–59, 1987.
MCLEOD, P.; JENKINS, S. Timing accuracy and decision time in high-speed ball games. International Journal of Sport Psychology, v. 22, n. 3, p. 279–
295, 1991.
MERCHANT, H.; ZARCO, W.; PRADO, L.; PÉREZ, O. Behavioral and neurophhysiological aspects of target interception. In: STERNAD, D. (Ed.).
Progress in Motor Control. Chicago: Springer, 2009. 629p. 201–220.
MIALL, R. C.; JENKINSON, N.; KULKARNI, K. Adaptation to rotated visual feedback: a re-examination of motor interference. Experimental Brain Research, v. 154, n. 2, p. 201–210, 2004.
MIALL, R. C.; WOLPERT, D. M. Forward models for physiological motor control. Neural Networks, v. 9, n. 8, p. 1265–1279, 1996.
MILNER, A. D.; GOODALE, M. A. Two visual systems re-viewed.
Neuropsychologia, v. 46, n. 3, p. 774–785, 2008.
MONTAGNE, G. Prospective control in sport. International Journal of Sport Psychology, v. 36, n. 2, p. 127, 2005.
MÜLLER, S.; ABERNETHY, B. Batting with occluded vision: an in situ
examination of the information pick-up and interceptive skills of high- and low-skilled cricket batsmen. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, v. 9, n. 6, p. 446–458, 2006.
PANCHUK, D.; VICKERS, J. N. Using spatial occlusion to explore the control strategies used in rapid interceptive actions: predictive or prospective control?
Journal of Sports Sciences, v. 27, n. 12, p. 1249–1260, 2009.
PROFETA, V. L. D. S. Nível de estabilização na resposta a perturbações imprevisíveis: efeitos sobre o feedback corrente e o feedforward. 2009.
Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, 2009.
REGAN, D. Visual factors in hitting and catching. Journal of Sports Sciences, v. 15, n. 6, p. 533–558, 1997.
RODRIGUES, S. T. O movimento dos olhos e a relação percepção-ação. In:
TEIXEIRA, L. A. (Ed.). Avanços em Comportamento Motor. São Paulo:
Movimento, 2001. p. 122–146.
RODRIGUES, S. T.; VICKERS, J. N.; WILLIAMS, A. M. Head, eye and arm coordination in table tennis. Journal of Sports Sciences, v. 20, n. 3, p. 187–
200, 2002.
ROSE, G. J. A multi level approach to the study of motor control and learning. Boston: Allyn and Bacon, 1997.
SARLEGNA, F. R.; MUTHA, P. K. The influence of visual target information on the online control of movements. Vision Research, v. 110, p. 144–154, 2014.
SAUNDERS, J. A.; KNILL, D. C. Humans use continuous visual feedback from the hand to control fast reaching movements. Experimental Brain Research, v. 152, n. 3, p. 341–352, 2003.
SAUNDERS, J. A.; KNILL, D. C. Humans use continuous visual feedback from the hand to control both the direction and distance of pointing movements.
Experimental Brain Research, v. 162, n. 4, p. 458–473, 2005.
SCHMIDT, R. A.; WRISBERG, C. A. Aprendizagem e performance motora:
uma abordagem da aprendizagem baseada no problema. 4a. ed. Porto Alegre: Artmed, 2010.
SEIDLER, R. D.; NOLL, D. .; THIERS, G. Feedforward and feedback processes in motor control. NeuroImage, v. 22, n. 4, p. 1775–1783, 2004.
TANI, G. Criança e movimento: o conceito de prática na aquisição de habilidades motoras. In: KREBS, R. J.; COPPETTI, F.; BELTRAME, T.;
ULSTRA, M. (Ed.). Perspectivas no estudo do desenvolvimento infantil.
Santa Maria: SIEC, 1999. p. 121–139.
TANI, G. Processo adaptativo em aprendizagem motora: o papel da
variabilidade. Revista Paulista de Educação Física, n. 3, p. 55–61, 2000.
TANI, G. Processo adaptativo: uma concepção de aprendizagem motora além da estabilização. In: TANI, G. (Ed.). Comportamento motor: aprendizagem e desenvolvimento. Rio de Janeiro: Guanabara Koogan, 2005. p. 60–67.
TANI, G.; CORREA, U. C.; BASSO, L.; BENDA, R. N.; UGRINOWITSCH, H.;
CHOSHI, K. An adaptive process model of motor learning: insights for the teaching of motor skills. Nonlinear Dynamics, Psychology, and Life Sciences, v. 18, n. 1, p. 47–65, 2014.
TEIXEIRA, L. A.; CHUA, R.; NAGELKERKE, P.; FRANKS, I. M. Use of visual information in the correction of interceptive actions. Experimental Brain Research, v. 175, n. 4, p. 758–763, 2006a.
TEIXEIRA, L. A.; CHUA, R.; NAGELKERKE, P.; FRANKS, I. M.
Reprogramming of interceptive actions: time course of temporal corrections for unexpected target velocity change. Journal of Motor Behavior, v. 38, p. 467–
477, 2006b.
TEIXEIRA, L. A.; LIMA, E. D. S.; FRANZONI, M. M. The continuous nature of timing reprogramming in an interceptive task. Journal of Sports Sciences, v.
23, n. 9, p. 943–950, 2005.
TRESILIAN, J. R. The accuracy of interceptive action in time and space.
Exercise and Sport Sciences Reviews, v. 32, p. 167–173, 2004.
TRESILIAN, J. R. Hitting a moving target: perception and action in the timing of rapid interceptions. Perception and Psychophysics, v. 67, n. 1, p. 129–149, 2005.
TRESILIAN, J. R. Sensorimotor control and learning: an introduction to the behavioral neuroscience of action. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2012.
TRESILIAN, J. R.; LONERGAN, A. Intercepting a moving target: effects of temporal precision constraints and movement amplitude. Experimental Brain Research, v. 142, n. 2, p. 193–207, 2002.
TRESILIAN, J. R.; PLOOY, A. Systematic changes in the duration and precision of interception in response to variation of amplitude and effector size.
Experimental Brain Research, v. 171, n. 4, p. 421–35, 2006.
TRESILIAN, R.; OLIVER, J.; CARROLL, J. Temporal precision of interceptive action: differential effects of target size and speed. Experimental Brain Research, v. 148, n. 4, p. 425–38, 2003.
UGRINOWITSCH, H. Efeito do nível de estabilização do desempenho e do tipo de perturbação no processo adaptativo em aprendizagem motora.
2003. Universidade de São Paulo, 2003.
UGRINOWITSCH, H.; BENDA, R. N. Contribuições da aprendizagem motora: a prática na intervenção em educação física. Revista Brasileira de Educação Física e Esporte, v. 25, n. spe, p. 25–35, 2011.
UGRINOWITSCH, H.; BENDA, R. N.; CORRÊA, U. C.; TANI, G. Extensive Practice Improves Adaptation to Predictable Perturbations in a Sequential Coincidente Timing Task. American Journal of Life Sciences, v. 2, n. 2, p.
90–95, 2014.
UGRINOWITSCH, H.; DOS SANTOS-NAVES, S. P.; CARBINATTO, M. V;
BENDA, R. N.; TANI, G. Motor skill adaptation depends on the level of learning.
World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, v. 77, p. 956–
960, 2011.
WERNER, J. S.; CHULAPA, L. M. The new visual neurosciences.
Cambridge: MIT Press, 2014.
WIJDENES, L. O.; BRENNER, E.; SMEETS, J. Comparing online adjustments to distance and direction in fast pointing movements. Journal of Motor
Behavior, v. 45, n. 5, p. 395–404, 2013.
WIJDENES, L. O.; BRENNER, E.; SMEETS, J. B. J. Online Manual Movement Adjustments in Response to Target Position Changes and Apparent Target Motion. Motor Control, v. 18, p. 44–54, 2014.
WOLPERT, D. M. Computational approaches to motor control. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, v. 1, n. 6, p. 209–216, 1997.
WOLPERT, D. M.; DIEDRICHSEN, J.; FLANAGAN, J. R. Principles of
sensorimotor learning. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, v. 12, p. 1–13, 2011.
WOLPERT, D. M.; FLANAGAN, J. R. Motor prediction. Current Biology, v. 11, n. 18, p. R729–R732, 2001.
WOLPERT, D. M.; GHAHRAMANI, Z. Computational principles of movement neuroscience. Nature Neuroscience, v. 3, n. Suppl, p. 1212–1217, 2000.
WOLPERT, D. M.; GHAHRAMANI, Z.; FLANAGAN, J. R. Perspectives and problems in motor learning. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, v. 5, n. 11, p. 487–
494, 2001.
WOLPERT, D. M.; GHAHRAMANI, Z.; JORDAN, M. I. An internal model for sensorimotor integration. Science, v. 269, p. 1880–1892, 1995.
WOLPERT, D. M.; KAWATO, M. Multiple paired forward and inverse models for motor control. Neural Networks, v. 11, n. 7-8, p. 1317–1329, 1998.
ZAGO, M.; BOSCO, G.; MAFFEI, V.; IOSA, M.; IVANENKO, Y. P.;
LACQUANITI, F. Internal models of target motion: expected dynamics overrides
measured kinematics in timing manual interceptions. Journal of Neurophysiology, v. 91, n. 4, p. 1620–1634, 2004.
ZAGO, M.; BOSCO, G.; MAFFEI, V.; IOSA, M.; IVANENKO, Y. P.;
LACQUANITI, F. Fast adaptation of the internal model of gravity for manual interceptions: evidence for event-dependent learning. Journal of
Neurophysiology, v. 93, n. 2, p. 1055–1068, 2005.
ZAGO, M.; MCINTYRE, J.; SENOT, P.; LACQUANITI, F. Visuo-motor
coordination and internal models for object interception. Experimental Brain Research, v. 192, n. 4, p. 571–604, 2009.
ZHAO, H.; WARREN, W. H. On-line and model-based approaches to the visual control of action. Vision Research, v. 110, p. 190–202, 2015.
ANEXOS