Implicações à pesquisa

É indiscutível a necessidade de estudos com metodologia e objetivos traçados com foco em segurança e eficácia, objetivando proporcionar dados estatísticos robustos e com relevância clínica e estatística.

7 REFERÊNCIAS

1. Liu Y, Wilkins M, Kim T, Malyugin B, Mehta JS. Cataracts. Lancet 2017; 390: 600– 12.

2. World Health Organization. Universal eye health: a global action plan 2014-2019. ISBN 978 92 4 150656 4.

3. Davison M, Padroni S, Bunce C, Rüschen H. Sub-Tenon’s anaesthesia versus topical anaesthesia for cataract surgery (Review). The Cochrane Library 2007, Issue 3.

4. Rashmi S, Akshaya KM, Mahesha S. Comparison of Topical Versus Sub‑Tenon’s Anesthesia in Phacoemulsification at a Tertiary Care Eye Hospital. J Ophthalmic Vis Res 2014; 9 (3): 329-333.

5. Ruschen H, Celaschi D, Bunce C, Carr C. Randomised controlled trial of sub-Tenon’s block versus topical anaesthesia for cataract surgery: a comparison of patient satisfaction. Br J Ophthalmol 2005; 89:291–293.

6. Nouvellon E, Cuvillon P, Ripart J, Viel EJ. Review article: Anaesthesia for Cataract Surgery. Drugs Aging 2010; 27 (1): 21-38.

7. Swetha V, Jeganathana E, Jeganathanc VP. Sub-Tenon’s anaesthesia: a well tolerated and effective procedure for ophthalmic surgery. Current Opinion in Ophthalmology 2009, 20:205–209.

8. Kumar CM, Eid H, Dodds C. Sub-Tenon’s anaesthesia: complications and their prevention. Eye (2011) 25, 694–703.

9. Huang P, Gopal L, Kumar CM. Correspondence: Comparison of postoperative redness of eyes after sub-Tenon's block and topical anaesthesia following phacoemulsification cataract surgery. British Journal of Anesthesia 2014; 112(2); 381-382.

10. Fredrickson MJ, Mantell NM, Watson AS, Vincent AL. A simple technique to minimize conjunctival haemorrhage following sub-tenon's block. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol 2007; 35: 685.

11. Zhao L, Zhu H. Resposta do autor. Ophthalmology 2013, 120 (1): 218.

12. Srinivasan S, Fern AL, Selvaraj S, Hasan S. Randomized double-blind clinical trial comparing topical and sub-Tenon’s anaesthesia in routine cataract surgery. British Journal of Anaesthesia 2004;93(5): 683–6.

13. Li-Quan Zhao e colaboradores. Topical Anesthesia versus Regional Anesthesia for Cataract Surgery: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Ophthalmology 2012; 119:659–667.

14. Kumar CM, Eke T, Dodds C, Deane JS, El-Hindy N, Johnston RL et al. Local anaesthesia for ophthalmic surgery. Joint guidelines from the Royal College of Anaesthetists and the Royal College of Ophthalmologists: London, 2012.

15. Frieman B, Friedberg M. Globe Perforation Associated With Subtenon’s Anesthesia. Am Journal of Ophthalmology 2001; 131(4): 520-521.

16. Guise P. Sub-Tenon Anesthesia. A Prospective Study of 6,000 Blocks. Anesthesiology 2003; 98:964–8.

17. Nouvellon E et al. Ophthalmic Regional Anesthesia. Medial Canthus Episcleral (Sub- Tenon) Single Injection Block. Anesthesiology 2004; 100:370–4.

18. Vohra SB. Staggered Sub-Tenon’s Blocks: A Novel Anesthetic Approach for Bilateral Strabismus Surgery. Ophthalmic Surgery, lasers and Imaging 2012; 43(3) 241-246.

19. Parkar T et al. Comparison of Subtenon Anaesthesia with Peribulbar Anaesthesia for Manual Small Incision Cataract Surgery. Indian J Ophthalmol 2005; 53:255-259.

20. Iganga ON et al. Comparison of Peribulbar with Posterior SubTenon's Anesthesia in Cataract Surgery Among Nigerians Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol. 2016; 23(2): 195– 200.

21. Kumar CM, Williamson S, Manickam B. A review of sub-Tenon's block: current practice and recent development. European Journal of Anaesthesiology, 2005; 8: 567- 577.

22. Ripart J, Lefrant J, Vivien B, Charavel P, Fabbro-Peray P, Jaussaud A, Dupeyron G, Eledjam J. Ophthalmic Regional Anesthesia: Medial Canthus Episcleral (Sub-Tenon) Anesthesia Is More Efficient than Peribulbar Anesthesia. Anesthesiology 2000; 92:1278–85.

23. Ghali AM, Mahfouz AK, Hafez A. Single injection percutaneous peribulbar anesthesia with a short needle versus sub-Tenon's anesthesia for cataract extraction. Saudi J Anaesth 2011; 5:138-41.

24. Lee RMH, Thompson JR, Eke T. Severe adverse events associated with local anaesthesia in cataract surgery: 1 year national survey of practice and complications in the UK. Br J Ophthalmol 2016; 100:772– 776.

25. Rathbone J, Albarqouni L, Bakhit M, Beller E, Byambasuren O, Hoffmann T, Scott AM, Glasziou P. Expediting citation screening using PICobased title-only screening

for identifying studies in scoping searches and rapid reviews. Systematic Reviews (2017) 6:233 DOI 10.1186/s13643-017-0629-x .

26. Cochrane Methods. Cochrane DB Syst Rev 2011 Suppl 1: 1–40.

27. Higgins JPT, Green S (editors). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available from www.handbook.cochrane.org .

28. Endnote Web [Software]. Site. Acesso via

https://www.myendnoteweb.com/EndNoteWeb.html .

29. Mourad Ouzzani, Hossam Hammady, Zbys Fedorowicz, and Ahmed Elmagarmid. Rayyan — a web and mobile app for systematic reviews. Systematic Reviews (2016) 5:210, DOI: 10.1186/s13643-016-0384-4.

30. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, The PRISMA Group (2009). Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement. PLoS Med 6(7): e1000097. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed1000097.

31. GRADEpro GDT: GRADEpro Guideline Development Tool [Software]. McMaster University, 2015 (developed by Evidence Prime, Inc.). Available from gradepro.org.

32. Diretrizes metodológicas: Sistema GRADE – Manual de graduação da qualidade da evidência e força de recomendação para tomada de decisão em saúde / Ministério da Saúde, Secretaria de Ciência, Tecnologia e Insumos Estratégicos, Departamento de Ciência e Tecnologia. – Brasília: Ministério da Saúde, 2014.72 p. : il. ISBN 978-85- 334-2186-8.

33. Review Manager (RevMan) [Programa estatístico]. Version 5.3. Copenhagen: The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration, 2014.

34. Adekola OO, Aribaba OT, Musa K, Olatosi JO, Asiyanbi GK, Rotimi-Samuel A, et al. Regional anesthesia for small incision cataract surgery: Comparison of subtenon and peribulbar block. J Clin Sci 2018; 15:1-7.

35. Al-Yousuf N. Sub-tenon versus peribulbar anaesthesia for cataract surgery. Bahrain Medical Bulletin. 2003; 25 (3): 1-6.

36. Bohacek N, Resetic J, Petek I, Vatavuk Z, Mandic Z. Peribulbar vs subtenon anesthesia for combined cataract and vitreous surgery. Period biol, Vol 113, Suppl 1, 2011. 29.

37. Briggs MC, Beck SA, Esakowitz L. Sub-tenons´s versus peribulbar anaesthesia for cataract surgery. Eye (1997) 11, 639-643.

38. Deshpande S, Deshpande, Ss, Reddy R, Reddy V. Comparing the effectiveness and safety of sub-tenon´s anaesthesia and peribulbar anaesthesia in anterior segment surgery. Indian Journal of Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, July- September,2016;2(3): 201-206.

39. Ghai B, Ram J, Makkar JK, Wig J, Kaushik S. Subtenon block compared to intravenous fentanyl for perioperative analgesia in pediatric cataract surgery. Anesth Analg 2009; 108:1132–8.

40. Kollarits CR, Jaweed S, Kollarits FJ. Comparison of pain, motility and preoperative sedation in cataract phacoemulsification patients receiving peribulbar or sub-tenon´s anesthesia. Ophthalmic Surgery Lasers. 1998; 29: 462-465.

41. Pianka P, Weintraub-Padova H, Lazar M, Geyer O. Effect of sub-tenon´s and peribulbar anesthesia on intraocular pressure and ocular pulse amplitude. Refract Surg 2001; 27:1221–1226.

42. Naguib MA. Comparison of Subtenon Anaesthesia with Peribulbar Anaesthesia for Phacoemulsification Cataract Surgery. Middle East Journal of Applied Sciences. 2017; 07(01): 189-194.

43. Shende D, Kalaiysaran R, Lokesh K, Khokhar S, Darlong V. Comparison of sub- tenon block, peribulbar block and iv fentanyl for perioperative analgesia in paediatric cataract surgery. Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine (ESRA abstracts). 2017. 42 (5) s1 e136.

44. Truc C, Dieudonne F, Vaudelin G, Rigal E, Bouletreau P. Comparative efficacy of peribulbar and episcleral block for cataract surgery. British journal of anesthesia. 1999; 82: 106 .

45. Azmon B, Alster Y, Lazar M, Geyer O. Effectiveness of sub-tenon´s versus peribulbar anesthesia in extracapsular cataract surgery. Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery. 1999; 25: 1946-1951.

46. Budd M, Brown JPR, Thomas J, Hardwick M, McDonald P, Barber K. A comparison of sub-tenon´s with peribulbar anaesthesia in patients undergoing sequential bilateral cataract surgery. 2009; 64: 19-22.

47. Irrazabal V, Scalamogna M, Cibils D, Samudio M, Varela S. Anestesia sub- Tenoniana versus Anestesia peribulbar em cirugia extracapsular de catarata. Mem Inst Investig Cienc Salud. 2006. 4;2: 37-44.

48. Khan SA, Alam M, Aftab AM, Iqbal M. Comparison of the Efficacy of Subtenon with Peribulbar Local Anesthesia without Hyaluronidase in Patients Undergoing Cataract Surgery. Journal of The College of Physicians and Surgeons Pakistan. 2014 24; 5: 331-334.

49. Matcha SC, Nandyala SKK, Murahari VK. Comparison of sub tenon´s versus peribulbar anesthesia in manual small incision cataract surgery cases.Journal of Health Sciences. 2015 3; 1: 68-70.

50. Ngwu RA, Adekoya BJ, Adejumo OA, Ibidapo OO, Vera OA. Comparison of the akinetic properties of subtenon’s anaesthesia versus peribulbar anaesthesia among cataract patients in Nigeria. Niger J Ophthalmol 2017; 25:95-100.

51. Prakash DN, Satish K, D´Silva A, Acharya A, Srivastava N, Afshan R, Johnson S, Amudha A. A comparison of peribulbar with parabulbar anaesthesia in patients undergoing manual small incision cataract surgery. J of Evolution of Med and Dental Sciences. 2014; 3, 39: 9968-9975.

52. Rizk SN, Fahim MR, El-Zakzouk ES. Peribulbar versus sub-tenon block in cardiac patients undergoing cataract surgery during warfarin therapy. Egyptian Journal of Anaesthesia. 2014; 30: 255-259.

53. Shahid E, Afaq A, Juzar UT, Ansari Z, Sharif UI, Hasan K. Sub-Tenon versus Peribulbar anesthesia in phacoemulsification a comparative study. Int J Ophthalmol Eye Res. 2013; 01(01): 09-13.

54. Singh P, Jadon A, Jakhanwal SP. Comparative evaluation of peribulbar anaesthesia and sub-tenon anaesthesia for manual small incision cataract surgery - a clinical study. SAS Journal of Surgery. 2017; 3(8): 204-210.