CAPÍTULO 6: CONSIDERAÇÕES FINAIS
6.2 RECOMENDAÇÕES FUTURAS
Para construção da estrutura do sistema de avaliação de ideias, foi considerado uma sessão de focus group como método de validação, gerando de forma satisfatórias as percepções necessárias para sua elaboração, porém o mesmo pode ser analisado em um ambiente real de geração de ideias, onde pode-se observar sob essa perspectiva o comportamento das variáveis do sistema de avaliação.
Estudar, de forma mais aprofundada, a relação entre os indicadores – curtidas e “pitacos” – utilizados na avaliação popular, e como a ponderação entre os mesmo influencia na qualidade da avaliação.
97
No processo de reconhecimento, identificar os tipos de premiações que podem ser utilizados no crowdsourcing, assim como estudar a relação de motivação entre os mesmos e o perfil das pessoas envolvidas, elencando as estratégias mais assertivas a serem consideradas pelas organizações.
O estrutura do sistema foi desenvolvido em um cenário de uma organização pública, sendo os critérios, métodos e fatores validados em tal contexto. Pode-se, portanto, realizar estudos futuros acerca do comportamento do sistema de avaliação sob a ótica de outras iniciativas crowdsourcing. Para isso, sugere-se realizar pesquisas do tipo pesquisa-ação.
98
REFERÊNCIAS
AMABILE, T. M. Componential Theory of Creativity (Working Paper No. 12096). 2012.
AMABILE, T. M., CONTI, R., COON, H., LAZENBY, J., & HERRON, M.. Assessing the work environment for creativity. Academy of management journal, v. 39, n. 5, p. 1154-1184, 1996.
BASADUR, M.; RUNCO, M. A. & VEGAXY, L. U. I. S. Understanding how creative thinking skills, attitudes and behaviors work together: A causal process model. The
Journal of Creative Behavior, v. 34, n. 2, p. 77-100, 2000.
BLAIR, C. S.; MUMFORD, M. D. Errors in idea evaluation: Preference for the unoriginal?.The journal of creative behavior, v. 41, n. 3, p. 197-222, 2007.
BLOHM, I., RIEDL, C., FÜLLER, J., & LEIMEISTER, J. M. . et al. Rate or Trade? Identifying Winning Ideas in Open Idea Sourcing. Information Systems Research, v. 27, n. 1, p. 27-48, 2016.
BLOHM, I., RIEDL, C., LEIMEISTER, J. M., & KRCMAR, H.. Idea evaluation mechanisms for collective intelligence in open innovation communities: Do traders outperform raters?. In: Proceedings of 32nd International Conference on
Information Systems. 2011.
BONABEAU, E. Decisions 2.0: The power of collective intelligence. MIT Sloan
management review, v. 50, n. 2, p. 45, 2009.
BRABHAM, D. C. Crowdsourcing as a model for problem solving an introduction and cases. Convergence: the international journal of research into new media
technologies, v. 14, n. 1, p. 75-90, 2008.
BRABHAM, D. C. Crowdsourcing. Mit Press, 2013.
BURGER-HELMCHEN, T.; PÉNIN, J. The limits of crowdsourcing inventive activities: What do transaction cost theory and the evolutionary theories of the firm teach us. In: Workshop on Open Source Innovation, Strasbourg, France. 2010. p. 1- 26.
CAROFF, X.; BESANÇON, M. Variability of creativity judgments. Learning and
individual differences, v. 18, n. 4, p. 367-371, 2008.
CHANAL, V.; CARON-FASAN, M. How to invent a new business model based on crowdsourcing: the Crowdspirit® case. In: Conférence de l'Association
Internationale de Management Stratégique. 2008. p. 1-27.
CHESBROUGH, H. W. The era of open innovation. Managing innovation and
change, v. 127, n. 3, p. 34-41, 2006.
CHESBROUGH, H. W. Open innovation: The new imperative for creating and
99
CHIU, C.; LIANG, T.; TURBAN, E. What can crowdsourcing do for decision support?. Decision Support Systems, v. 65, p. 40-49, 2014.
CLUZEL, F. YANNOU, B., MILLET, D., LEROY, Y. Eco-ideation and eco-selection of R&D projects portfolio in complex systems industries. Journal of Cleaner
Production, v. 112, p. 4329-4343, 2016.
CORREA, C.H., FERREIRA D. M., A. Method for decision making in the management of innovation: criteria for the evaluations of ideas. In: Presented at the International
Association for Management of Technology, pp. 2151e2169. 2015.
CRESWELL, J. W. Projeto de pesquisa métodos qualitativo, quantitativo e misto. In: Projeto de pesquisa métodos qualitativo, quantitativo e misto. Artmed, 2010. CROWE, E.; HIGGINS, E. T. Regulatory focus and strategic inclinations: Promotion and prevention in decision-making. Organizational behavior and human decision
processes, v. 69, n. 2, p. 117-132, 1997.
CSIKSZENTMIHALYI, M. Edited extract from R. Sternberg (Ed)(1999). Handbook
of creativity. 1999.
CSIKSZENTMIHALYI, M. A systems perspective on creativity. London: Sage
Publications, 2001.
DEAN, D. L., HENDER, J. M., RODGERS, T. L., & SANTANEN, E. et al. Identifying quality, novel, and creative ideas: constructs and scales for idea evaluation. Journal of
the Association for Information Systems, Vol. 7, pp. 646-698, 2006.
EBNER, W.; LEIMEISTER, J. M.; KRCMAR, H. Community engineering for innovations: the ideas competition as a method to nurture a virtual community for innovations. R&d Management, v. 39, n. 4, p. 342-356, 2009.
ELING, K.; LANGERAK, F.; GRIFFIN, A. The performance effects of combining rationality and intuition in making early new product idea evaluation decisions. Creativity and Innovation Management, v. 24, n. 3, p. 464-477, 2015. ESTELLÉS-AROLAS, E.; GONZÁLEZ-LADRÓN-DE-GUEVARA, F. Towards an integrated crowdsourcing definition. Journal of Information science, v. 38, n. 2, p. 189-200, 2012.
EUBANKS, D. L.; MUMFORD, M. D. Leader errors and the influence on performance: An investigation of differing levels of impact. The Leadership
Quarterly, v. 21, n. 5, p. 809-825, 2010.
FERNANDES, M. S. G. CREATION: técnica de criatividade para geração de ideias de novos produtos. Dissertação (Mestrado) – Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte. Centro de Tecnologia. Programa de Pós-Graduação em Engenharia de
Produção, 2013.
GABRIEL, A., CAMARGO, M., MONTICOLO, D., BOLY, V., & BOURGAULT, M. Improving the idea selection process in creative workshops through contextualisation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2016.
100 GASSMANN, O.; WECHT, C. H. Early customer integration into the innovation process. Institute of Technology Management, University of St. Gallen, Switzerland, 2005.
GEIGER, D., ROSEMANN, M., FIELT, E., & SCHADER, M. et al. Crowdsourcing information systems-definition, typology and design. Thirty Third International
Conference on Information Systems, Orlando, 2012.
GEIGER, D., SEEDORF, S., SCHULZE, T., NICKERSON, R. C., & SCHADER, M.. Managing the Crowd: Towards a Taxonomy of Crowdsourcing Processes. In: AMCIS. 2011.
GIL, A. C. Como elaborar projetos de pesquisa. 4. ed. São Paulo: Atlas, 2009.
GONZÁLEZ, M. O. A. Processo de gerenciar a integração de clientes no processo de desenvolvimento de produtos. Tese de Doutorado. Centro de Ciências Exatas e
Tecnologia, Departamento de Engenharia de Produção, Universidade Federal de São Carlos, São Carlos, 2010.
GRAEFE, A. Prediction Markets versus Alternative Methods: Empirical tests of Accuracy and Acceptability. Tese de Doutorado. Karlsruhe, Univ., Diss., 2009.
GRAY, D.; BROWN, S.; MACANUFO, J. Gamestorming: A playbook for innovators, rulebreakers, and changemakers. O'Reilly Media, Inc., 2010.
GRIER, D.A. Not for all markets. Computer; 44(5): 6–8, 2011.
GUITOUNI, A.; MARTEL, J. Tentative guidelines to help choosing an appropriate MCDA method. European Journal of Operational Research, v. 109, n. 2, p. 501-521, 1998.
GUTIÉRREZ, E. Managing Ambiguity When Evaluating and Selecting New Ideas in Project Portfolio Management. International Journal of Innovation and Technology
Management, v. 11, n. 05, p. 1450030, 2014.
HAO, N., KU, Y., LIU, M., HU, Y., BODNER, M., GRABNER, R. H., & FINK, A. Reflection enhances creativity: Beneficial effects of idea evaluation on idea generation. Brain and cognition, v. 103, p. 30-37, 2016.
HENNESSEY, B. A.; AMABILE, T. M. Consensual assessment. Encyclopedia of
creativity, v. 1, p. 253-260, 2011.
HERMAN, A.; REITER-PALMON, Roni. The effect of regulatory focus on idea generation and idea evaluation. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, v. 5, n. 1, p. 13, 2011.
HIGGINS, E. T. Beyond pleasure and pain. In HIGGINS, E. T; KRUGLANSKI, A. W. Motivational science: Social and personality perspectives. Psychology Press, 2000. HIGGINS, E. T. Promotion and prevention: Regulatory focus as a motivational principle. Advances in experimental social psychology, v. 30, p. 1-46, 1998.
101
HOLLEY, R. Crowdsourcing: how and why should libraries do it?. D-Lib Magazine, v. 16, n. 3, p. 4, 2010.
HOWE, J. O poder das multidões: porque a força da coletividade está remodelando o futuro dos negócios. Editora Campus/Elsevier, 2009.
HOWE, J. The rise of crowdsourcing. Wired magazine, v. 14, n. 6, p. 1-4, 2006.
HOWE, J. Crowdsourcing: How the power of the crowd is driving the future of
business. Random House, 2008.
HUANG, Y.; SINGH, P.; MUKHOPADHYAY, T. Crowdsourcing contests: a dynamic structural model of the impact of incentive structure on solution quality. 2012.
JAGTAP, S. et al. Interdependency between average novelty, individual average novelty, and variety. International Journal of Design Creativity and Innovation, v. 3, n. 1, p. 43-60, 2015.
KAHRAMAN, C.; BÜYÜKÖZKAN, G.; ATEŞ, N. Y. A two phase multi-attribute decision-making approach for new product introduction. Information Sciences, v. 177, n. 7, p. 1567-1582, 2007.
KANEXA, I., REITER-PALMON, R. The Effect of Regulatory Focus on Idea Generation and Idea Evaluation. Psychology Faculty Publications. Paper 18, 2011. KLEEMANN, F.; VOß, G. G.; RIEDER, K. Un (der) paid innovators: The commercial utiliza-tion of consumer work through crowdsourcing. Science, technology &
innovation Studies, v. 4, n. 1, p. PP. 5-26, 2008.
KOBAYASHI, M. et al. Collaboration Support System for Analyzing Individual Differences Based on Designers’ Idea Evaluation. In: DS 58-5: Proceedings of ICED
09, the 17th International Conference on Engineering Design, Vol. 5, Design Methods and Tools (pt. 1), Palo Alto, CA, USA, 24.-27.08. 2009.
KUDROWITZ, B. M.; WALLACE, D. Assessing the quality of ideas from prolific, early-stage product ideation. Journal of Engineering Design, v. 24, n. 2, p. 120-139, 2013.
LA VECCHIA, G.; CISTERNINO, A. Collaborative workforce, business process crowdsourcing as an alternative of BPO. In: International Conference on Web
Engineering. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, p. 425-430. 2010.
LIIKKANEN, L. A. et al. Quantitative evaluation of the effectiveness of idea generation in the wild. In: International Conference on Human Centered Design. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2011. p. 120-129.
LIMAYEM, M.; DESANCTIS, G. Providing decisional guidance for multicriteria decision making in groups. Information Systems Research, v. 11, n. 4, p. 386-401, 2000.
102
MAGNUSSON, P. R. Exploring the contributions of involving ordinary users in ideation of technology based services. Journal of Product Innovation Management, v. 26, n. 5, p. 578-593, 2009.
MAGNUSSON, P. R.; NETZ, J.; WÄSTLUND, E. Exploring holistic intuitive idea screening in the light of formal criteria. Technovation, v. 34, n. 5, p. 315-326, 2014. MARCONI, M. A.; LAKATOS, E. M. Fundamentos de metodologia científica. In: Fundamentos de metodologia científica. Atlas, 2010.
MARTINS, G. A. Estudo de caso: uma estratégia de pesquisa. In: Estudo de caso: uma
estratégia de pesquisa. Atlas, 2008.
MAZZOLA, D.; DISTEFANO, A. Crowdsourcing and the participation process for problem solving: The Case of BP. In: Proceedings of It AIS 2010 VII Conference of
the Italian Chapter of AIS. Napoles: It AIS, p. 42-49. 2010.
MEDAUAR, O. Direito administrativo moderno. 2001.
MEIRELLES, H. L. Direito Administrativo Brasileiro. 24. ed. atualizada por Eurico Andrade Azevedo, Délcio Balestero Aleixo e José Emmanuel Burle Filho. São Paulo: Malheiros Editores, 1999.
MORGAN, D. L. Focus groups as qualitative research. Sage publications, 1997. OLIVEIRA, F.; RAMOS, I.; SANTOS, L. Definition of a crowdsourcing innovation service for the European SMEs. In: International Conference on Web Engineering. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, p. 412-416. 2010.
ONARHEIM, B.; CHRISTENSEN, B. T. Distributed idea screening in stage-gate development process. Journal of Engineering Design, v. 23, n 9, p 660-673, 2012. OSBORNE/GAEBLER. Reinventing Government. How to Entrepreneurial Spirit is
Transforming the Public Sector. Addison Wesley., 1992.
PARASURAMAN, A. Marketing research. Toronto: Addison-WesleyPublishing Company, 1986.
PENG, L.; ZHANG, M. An empirical study of social capital in participation in online crowdsourcing. In: E-Product E-Service and E-Entertainment (ICEEE), 2010
International Conference on. IEEE, p. 1-4. 2010.
PILLER, F. T.; WALCHER, D. Toolkits for idea competitions: a novel method to integrate users in new product development. R&d Management, v. 36, n. 3, p. 307- 318, 2006.
POETZ, M. K.; SCHREIER, Martin. The value of crowdsourcing: can users really compete with professionals in generating new product ideas?. Journal of Product
Innovation Management, v. 29, n. 2, p. 245-256, 2009.
REICHWALD, R.; PILLER, F. Open Innovation, Individualisierung und neue Formen der Arbeitsteilung. Wiesbaden: Gabler, 2006.
103
REITER-PALMON, R.; ILLIES, J. J. Leadership and creativity: Understanding leadership from a creative problem-solving perspective. The Leadership Quarterly, v. 15, n. 1, p. 55-77, 2004.
RESENDE JÚNIOR, P.; GUIMARÃES, T.; BILHIM, J. Inovação no setor público: Análise comparativa entre organizações do Brasil e Portugal. Revista Portuguesa e
Brasileira de Gestão, v. 12, n. 4, p. 02-11, 2013.
RIEDL, C. et al. The effect of rating scales on decision quality and user attitudes in online innovation communities. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, v. 17, n. 3, p. 7-36, 2013.
RIETZSCHEL, E. F.; NIJSTAD, B. A.; STROEBE, Wolfgang. Productivity is not enough: A comparison of interactive and nominal brainstorming groups on idea generation and selection. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, v. 42, n. 2, p. 244-251, 2006.
Rio Grande do Norte. Pró-Reitoria de Gestão de Pessoas da UFRN. Planejamento
Estratégico. 2016. Disponível em: <www.progesp.ufrn.br>. Acesso em: 05 set. 2016.
Rio Grande do Norte. Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte. Plano de
Desenvolvimento Institucional. 2016. Disponível em: <www.ufrn.br>. Acesso em: 04
set. 2016.
ROBLEDO, I. C. et al. Errors and understanding: The effects of error-management training on creative problem-solving. Creativity Research Journal, v. 24, n. 2-3, p. 220-234, 2012.
ROZENFELD, H. et al. Gestão de Desenvolvimento de Produtos–Uma Referência para a melhoria do Processo. 1ª edição-São Paulo: Saraiva. 2006.
SAXTON, G. D.; OH, O.; KISHORE, R. Rules of crowdsourcing: Models, issues, and systems of control. Information Systems Management, v. 30, n. 1, p. 2-20, 2013. SCHERER, F. O. Gestão da inovação no setor público: a metodologia do octógono
da inovação no setor público. 2014. Disponível em: http://www1.tjrs.jus.br/. Acesso
em 01. Jul 2015.
SCOTT, W. R. Institutions and Organizations. Ideas, Interests and Identities. Sage
Publications, 2013.
SHAH, J. J.; SMITH, S. M.; VARGAS-HERNANDEZ, N. Metrics for measuring ideation effectiveness. Design studies, v. 24, n. 2, p. 111-134, 2004.
SLOANE, P. The brave new world of open innovation. Strategic direction, v. 27, n. 5, p. 3-4, 2011.
SOARES, A. V. A. Inovação no setor público: obstáculos e alternativas. 2009. Disponível em: www.administradores.com.br/. Acesso em 02. Jul 2015.
SUROWIECKI, J. The wisdom of crowds: why the many are smarter than the few. London. Abacus: New Edition, 2005.
104 TSENG, M. M.; PILLER, F. (Ed.). The customer centric enterprise: advances in mass customization and personalization. Springer Science & Business Media, 2011.
TUNG, W.; YUAN, S.; TSAI, J. A custom collaboration service system for idea management of mobile phone design. Human Factors and Ergonomics in
Manufacturing & Service Industries, v. 19, n. 5, p. 494-509, 2009.
VERHAEGEN, P.; VANDEVENNE, D; PEETERS, J.; DUFLOU, J. Refinements to the variety metric for idea evaluation. Design Studies, v. 34, n. 2, p. 243-263, 2012. VON OECH, R. Um chute na rotina: os quatro papéis essenciais do processo criativo. São Paulo. Cultura editores associados, 1994.
VUKOVIC, M. Crowdsourcing for enterprises. In: 2009 Congress on Services-I. IEEE, p. 686-692. 2009.
WHITLA, P. Crowdsourcing and its application in marketing activities. Contemporary
Management Research, v. 5, n. 1, 2009.
XIE, L.; ZHANG, P. Idea Management System for Team Creation. Journal of
software, v. 5, n. 11, p. 1187-1194, 2010.
YANG, J.; ADAMIC, L. A.; ACKERMAN, M. S. Crowdsourcing and knowledge sharing: strategic user behavior on taskcn. In:Proceedings of the 9th ACM conference
on Electronic commerce. ACM, p. 246-255. 2008.
YANG, Y. Open innovation contests in online markets: idea generation and idea evaluation with collective intelligence. Temple University Graduate Board. 2012. YIN, R. K. Estudo de Caso: Planejamento e Métodos. Bookman editora, 4. ed. Porto alegre: bookman. 2010.
105
APÊNDICES
APÊNDICE A – Tabela-resumo da pesquisa bibliográfica sistemática sobre o tema Avaliação de Ideias.
APÊNDICE B – Tabela-resumo da pesquisa bibliográfica sistemática sobre o tema
Crowdsourcing.
APÊNDICE C – Programação do workshop.
APÊNDICE D – Questões orientadoras utilizadas no focus group. APÊNDICE E – Modelo da pasta utilizada no focus group.
APÊNDICE F – Contribuições realizadas por meio dos post-its no focus group. APÊNDICE G – Registro fotográfico da sessão do focus group.
106
APÊNDICE A – Tabela-resumo da pesquisa bibliográfica sistemática
sobre o tema Avaliação de Ideias.
TÍTULO AUTOR ANO PERIÓDICO
Product Innovation Assessment Training Idea Screening and Business Analysis Module for the Marketing Curriculum
Duke, C.R. 1992 Journal of Marketing Education
Metrics for measuring ideation effectiveness
Jami J. Shah and Noe
Vargas-Hernandez 2002 Design Studies Idea evaluation from
coevolution. De Jong, E; Pollack 2004
Evolutionary
Computation, Summer A new approach based on soft
computing to accelerate the selection of new product ideas
Büyüközkan, Gülçin;
Feyzioğlu, Orhan 2004 Computers in Industry Identifying quality, novel, and
creative ideas: constructs and scales for idea evaluation.
Dean, D. L., Hender, J. M., Rodgers, T. L., & Santanen, E. L. 2006 Journal of the Association for Information Systems A fuzzy group-preferences
analysis method for new-product development
Lo, Chin-Chun; Wang,
Ping ; Chao, Kuo-Ming 2006
Expert Systems With Applications
Productivity is not enough: A comparison of interactive and nominal brainstorming groups on idea generation and selection
Rietzschel, Eric F. ; Nijstad, Bernard A. ; Stroebe, Wolfgang
2006 Journal of Experimental Social Psychology
Errors in idea evaluation: Preference for the unoriginal?
Blair, C.S., Mumford,
M.D. 2007
Journal of Creative Behavior
Idea evaluation: Error in evaluating highly original ideas
Licuanan, B.F., Dailey,
L.R., Mumford, M.D. 2007
Journal of Creative Behavior
Adaptive idea screening using consumers
Toubia, Olivier; Flores,
Laurent 2007 Marketing Science
A two phase multi-attribute decision-making approach for new product introduction
Kahraman, Cengiz ; Büyüközkan, Gülçin ; Ateş, Nüfer Yasin
2007 Information Sciences
New service ideas screening Bivainis, J., Drejeris, R. 2008 Business: Theory and Practice Collaboration support system for
analyzing individual differences based on designers' idea evaluation
Kobayashi, M., Higashi,
M. 2009
International Conference on Engineering Design
Creating change and driving innovation in highly automated and lean organizations: The Temporal Think Tank™ (T3™)
Lindeke, Richard R.; Wyrick, David A.; Chen, Hongyi
2009
Robotics and Computer Integrated
107
Collaboration support method based on analyzing individual differences in designers' idea evaluation Authors of DocumentKobayashi, M., Kawakami, T., Higashi, M. 2010
Nihon Kikai Gakkai Ronbunshu, C
Hen/Transactions of the Japan Society of Mechanical Engineers, Part C
Leader errors and the influence on performance: An
investigation of differing levels of impact
Eubanks, DL; Mumford,
MD 2010 Leadership Quarterly
Method for analyzing individual differences in idea evaluation and interpretation
Kobayashi, M., Higashi,
M. 2010
International Conference on Design Creativity
A fuzzy logic-based evaluation method for idea screening of product design
Ko, Y.-T., Kuo, P.-H. 2010
International Conference on Industrial
Engineering and Engineering Management Idea Generation and the Quality
of the Best Idea 2010 Management Science
Idea management system for team creation
Xie, Luning; Zhang,
Pengzhu 2010 Journal of Software
Emerging ideas: Evaluation of stem cells genetically modified with scleraxis to improve rotator cuff healing
Gulotta, L.V., Rodeo,
S.A. 2011
Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research
Idea evaluation mechanisms for collective intelligence in open innovation communities: Do traders outperform
Blohm, I., Riedl, C., Leimeister,
J.M.,Krcmar, H. 2011
International Conference on Information Systems
The Effect of Regulatory Focus on Idea Generation and Idea Evaluation
Herman, Anne ; Reiter- Palmon, Roni Smith, Jeffrey K. (editor); Smith, Lisa F. (editor); Kaufman, James C. (editor); Reiter-Palmon, Roni (editor) 2011 Psychology Of Aesthetics Creativity And The Arts
Antecedents and Consequences of Reflexivity in New Product Idea Screening
Hammedi, Wafa; Van Riel, Allard C. R.; Sasovova, Zuzana
2011 Journal of Product Innovation Management Closing the loop between design
and market for new product idea screening decisions
Chan, S.L.; Ip, W.H.;
Kwong, C.K. 2011
Expert Systems With Applications
Idea screening in engineering design using employee-driven wisdom of the crowds
Onarheim, B., Christensen, B.T. 2011 International Conference on Engineering Design - Impacting Society Through Engineering Design
Creativity: The role of unconscious processes in idea generation and idea selection
Ritter, Simone M.; van Baaren, Rick B.; Dijksterhuis, Ap
2011 Thinking Skills and Creativity
108
Collective intelligence and practice-based innovation: An idea evaluation method based on collective intelligence
Salminen,
J., Harmaakorpi, V. 2012
Practice-Based Innovation: Insights, Applications and Policy Implications
Conceptions of Creativity and Relations with Judges' Intelligence and Personality
Storme, M; Lubart, T 2012 Journal Of Creative Behavior
Distributed idea screening in stage-gate development processes Onarheim, B; Christensen, Bt 2012 Journal Of Engineering Design Divergent Thinking as an
Indicator of Creative Potential Runco, MA; Acar, S 2012
Creativity Research Journal
Errors and Understanding: The Effects of Error-Management Training on Creative Problem- Solving
Robledo, Ic; Hester, KS; Peterson, Dr; Barrett, JD; Day, Ea; Hougen, D ; Mumford, MD
2012 Creativity Research Journal
Existing problems of idea evaluations and possible areas of improvement Messerle, M., Binz, H., Roth, D. 2012 Proceedings of International Design Conference
Idea generation and idea evaluation: Cognitive skills and deliberate practices
Puccio, G.J., Cabra, J.F. 2012 Handbook of
Organizational Creativity Method of creativity including
an ideas evaluation tool: Application in an international workshop Roussel, B., Bary, R., Ferioli, M. 2012 Proceedings of International Design Conference, DESIGN Supporting initial trust in
distributed idea generation and idea evaluation
Schumann, J., Shih, P.C., Redmiles, D.F., Horton, G.
2012 International Conference on Support Group Work
Distributed idea screening in stage-gate development processes Onarheim, B.; Christensen, B.T. 2012 Journal Of Engineering Design
A dynamic and fuzzy modeling approach for multi-attribute new product idea screening and portfolio
Li, F., Yang, Y., Xie, J.,
Zhao, X., Ma, J., Li, Y. 2012
International Journal of Advancements in Computing Technology Distributed idea screening in
stage-gate development processes Onarheim, B., Christensen, B.T. 2012 Journal of Engineering Design
Good morning creativity: task reactivation during sleep enhances beneficial effect of sleep on creative performance
Ritter, Simone M.; Strick, Madelijn; Van Baaren, Rick B.; Dijksterhuis, Ap; Bos, Maarten W.
2012 Journal of Sleep Research
Science text comprehension: Drawing, main idea selection, and summarizing as learning strategies
Leopold, Claudia;
109
Smart Ideas for Smart Cities: Investigating Crowdsourcing for Generating and Selecting Ideas for ICT Innovation in a City Context
Schuurman, Dimitri; Baccarne, Bastiaan; De Marez, Lieven; Mechant, Peter
2012
Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research
Assessing the quality of ideas from prolific, early-stage product ideation
Kudrowitz, Barry Matthew; Wallace, David
2013 Journal of Engineering Design, February
Collective Engagement in Creative Tasks
Harvey, Sarah; Kou,
Chia-Yu 2013
Administrative Science Quarterly
Creativity in teams: An
examination of team accuracy in the idea evaluation and selection process Kennel, V., Reiter- Palmon, R., De Vreede, T., De Vreede, G.J. 2013 Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences
Refinements to the variety metric for idea evaluation
Verhaegen, Paul - Armand; Vandevenne, Dennis; Peeters, Jef; Duflou, Joost R
2012 Design Studies
Consumer co-creation and new product development: A case study in the food industry
Filieri, Raffaele 2013 Marketing Intelligence and Planning
A Hierarchical Group Decision- Making Approach for New Product Selection in a Fuzzy Environment
Mousavi, SM; Torabi, SA; Tavakkoli-
Moghaddam, R 2013
Arabian Journal For Science And Engineering
Expertise in musical
improvisation and creativity: the mediation of idea evaluation
Kleinmintz, Oded M; Goldstein, Pavel; Mayseless, Naama; Abecasis, Donna; Shamay-Tsoory, Simone G 2014 PloS one
Managing Ambiguity When Evaluating and Selecting New Ideas in Project Portfolio Management
Gutiérrez, Ernesto 2014
International Journal of Innovation and
Technology Managemen What can crowdsourcing do for
decision support? Chiu, CM; Liang, TP;