4.2 Characterization Survey Methods
4.2.2 Physical Habitat Characterization
4.2.2.5 Evaluation
Illustration of results Maps, graphs, statistics, verbal description
Field of application
Combined data analyses (e.g., field-based physical habitat measurements, water chemistry, temperature, and remote imagery of basin land use and land cover) to describe additional habitat attributes and larger scales of physical habitat or human disturbance.
Other The Physical Habitat Characterization was part of the Environmental Monitoring and Assessment program Western Pilot Study (EMAP-W) that was executed from 2000 to 2004
2.1.1 Methods designed to fulfil the requirements of the Water Framework
Directive
As the Member States of the European Union are obligated to fulfill the requirements of the Water Framework Directive to achieve the pre-defined objectives (see 3.1 The
European Water Framework Directive), every country has to design river assessment methods based on the guidelines of the WFD.
Table 12 and Table 13 illustrate examples of hydromorphological inventory methods that were developed to meet the requirements of the WFD:
France
Table 12: SYRAH-CE (Système relationnel d’audit de l’hydromorphologie des cours d’eau.
(Chandesris et al. 2009)
Working Title SYRAH-CE (Système relationnel d’audit de l’hydromorphologie des cours d’eau)
Development Cemagref (l’Institut de recherche en sciences et technologies pour l'environnement, 2008)
Customer Ministère de l’Écologie, du Développement durable, des Transports et du Logement
Thematic emphases Types of damage - disturbance of physical functioning and structures
Brief characterization methodology
A multi-scale hierarchical framework assessment ("top down"
approach) of large scale "damage risk": damage to processes (flow and sediment transport in particular) and structures (resulting morphology).
Mapped/evaluated criteria/parameters
Watershed scale analysis: land use and activities (urbanization, agriculture, transport, energy), engineering works and uses Reach scale analysis: processes alterations, structures alterations, habitat alterations
Fourteen types of hydromorphological damage are processed Investigation unit Large scale assessment and assessment of homogeneous
reaches respectively sub-reaches
Reference condition Detection of hydro morphological damages of a "non-natural origin" which can be clearly linked to deterioration of the
"Ecological state".
Evaluation Indicator values for the identified "features and uses" of each
analytical unit; delineation of sectors likely to be classified in
"High status" according to the WFD
Illustration of results Maps, georeferenced mapped databases, verbal description Field of application
Analysis tool for the hydromorphological functions of water courses to achieve the objectives set by the European Water Framework Directive; aid for management decision and functional restoration.
Other
The primary determinants on a regional scale (relief, climate, geology) define the hydro morphological control variables (hydrological and sedimentary regimes, width and gradient of valley bottoms). The key factors of ecological status are dependent on these variables, as well as on the structure of the riparian vegetation and the correct state of the water course's lateral and vertical connectivity: physical habitat, aquatic
"climate", food webs.
Italy
Table 13: Guidebook for the evaluation of stream morphological conditions by the Morphological Quality Index (IQM)
(Rinaldi et al. 2009 and http://www.isprambiente.gov.it 2011)
Working Title Guidebook for the evaluation of stream morphological conditions by the Morphological Quality Index (IQM)
Authors Rinaldi, M., Surian, N., Comiti, F., Bussettini, M. (2011) Customer Istituto Superiore per la Protezione e la Ricerca Ambientale Thematic emphases Evaluation of present conditions and future monitoring Brief characterization
methodology Field survey and interpretation Remote sensing and GIS analyses Mapped/evaluated
criteria/parameters
Phase 1: General setting and segmentation (physiographic units, confinement, channel morphologies, other discontinuities)
Phase 2: Evaluation of the current morphological conditions (vegetation, morphology, continuity, hydrology) - functionality, artificiality, morphological changes.
Phase 3: Monitoring (current trends, morphological recovery).
Investigation unit Segmentation into relatively homogeneous reaches (up to several km)
Reference condition
Reference condition identified with: (a) functionality of the processes, corresponding to dynamic equilibrium conditions; (b) absence of artificiality; (c) absence of significant adjustments of form, size and bed elevation in a time interval of the last decades.
Evaluation Scoring system, result is one of 5 classes (1-5) Illustration of results Maps, photo documentation, verbal description
Field of application
The method is designed to fit with the requirements of the WFD, but it is not exclusive for this scope. It evaluates the morphological conditions (quality) independently from the ecological state, it emphasizes processes and trends of channel
3 Legal Framework and the Implications on Assessment Methods
Laws and regulations not only reflect the development of a society, they also have the function to control and support further development. The new directives of the European Union significantly influence the national legislation of the Member States, also in the field of the protection and the sustainable use of natural resources.
3.1 The European Water Framework Directive
In December 2000, the European Water Framework Directive was established that requires from the Member States the achievement of the good ecological status for all natural surface water bodies which are not heavily modified. The purpose and the objectives of this directive are precisely defined as illustrated by the following chapters (shortened and extracted from:
European Commission 2000):
3.1.1 Purpose
Article 1
“The purpose of this Directive is to establish a framework for the protection of inland surface waters, transitional waters, coastal waters and groundwater which:
(a) prevents further deterioration and protects and enhances the status of aquatic ecosystems and, with regard to their water needs, terrestrial ecosystems and wetlands directly depending on the aquatic ecosystems;
(b) promotes sustainable water use based on a long-term protection of available water resources;
(c) aims at enhanced protection and improvement of the aquatic environment, inter alia, through specific measures for the progressive reduction of discharges, emissions and losses of priority substances and the cessation or phasing-out of discharges, emissions and losses of the priority hazardous substances;
(d) ensures the progressive reduction of pollution of groundwater and prevents its further pollution, and
(e) contributes to mitigating the effects of floods and droughts
and thereby contributes to:
- the provision of the sufficient supply of good quality surface water and groundwater as needed for sustainable, balanced and equitable water use, - a significant reduction in pollution of groundwater,
- the protection of territorial and marine waters, and
The European Water Framework Directive consists of a complex system of rules concerning procedures, measures and time limits. The following sections give an overview of the main points with the focus on rivers and hydromorphology.
3.1.3.1 River Basin Districts
According to the Water Framework Directive Member States have to assign the river catchments within their national territory to individual river basin districts. ‘River basin district’
is defined as “the area of land and sea, made up of one or more neighbouring river basins together with their associated groundwaters and coastal waters, which is identified as the main unit for management of river basins”.
The Water Framework Directive requires that “each Member State ensures that for each river basin district or for the portion of an international river basin district falling within its territory:
- an analysis of its characteristics,
- a review of the impacts of human activity on the status of surface waters and on groundwater, and
- an economic analysis of water use is undertaken and that it is completed at the latest four years after the date of entry into force of the Directive.
These analyses and reports have to be reviewed, and if necessary updated at the latest 13 years after the date of entry into force of the Water Framework Directive and every six years thereafter” (European Commission 2000).
3.1.3.2 Characterization of Surface Water Body Types
After the identification of the location and boundaries of bodies of surface water, the Member States have to carry out a first characterization of all these water bodies using the following methodology (cf. European Commission 2000):
1. “The surface water bodies within a river basin district are assigned to one of the surface water categories:
- rivers, lakes, transitional waters or coastal waters
- or artificial surface water bodies or heavily modified surface water bodies.
2. For each surface water category, the relevant surface water bodies within the river basin district are differentiated according to types that are defined using either “system A” or
“system B“ ( see Table 14 and Table 15).
3. System A: First, the surface water bodies within the river basin district are allotted to the relevant ecoregions. Then the water bodies within each ecoregion are differentiated by surface water body types with the help of the descriptors listed in the tables for system A.
4. If system B is used, Member States must achieve at least the same degree of differentiation as would be achieved using system A. The surface water bodies within the river basin district are differentiated into types using the values for the obligatory descriptors and such optional descriptors, or combinations of descriptors, as are required to ensure that type specific biological reference conditions can be reliably derived.
5. For artificial and heavily modified surface water bodies the differentiation is undertaken in accordance with the descriptors for whichever of the surface water categories most closely resembles the heavily modified or artificial water body concerned.
6. Member States have to submit to the Commission a map or maps (in a GIS format) of the geographical location of the types consistent with the degree of differentiation required under system A” (European Commission 2000).
Table 14: Ecoregions and Surface Water Body Types: Rivers - System A.
(European Commission 2000)
Fixed typology Descriptors
Ecoregion Ecoregions shown on map A in Annex XI of
the Water Framework Directive
Type Altitude typology
high: >800 m
mid-altitude: 200 to 800 m lowland: <200 m
Size typology based on catchment area small: 10 to 100 km2
medium: >100 to 1 000 km2 large: >1 000 to 10 000 km2 very large: >10 000 km2
Geology: calcareous, siliceous, organic
Table 15: Ecoregions and Surface Water Body Types: Rivers - System B.
(European Commission 2000)
Alternative characterisation Physical and chemical factors that determine the characteristics of the river or part of the river and hence the biological population structure and composition
Obligatory factors altitude
latitude longitude geology size Optional factors
distance from river source
energy of flow (function of flow and slope) mean water width
mean water depth mean water slope
form and shape of main river bed river discharge (flow) category valley shape
transport of solids
acid neutralising capacity
3.1.3.3 Type-specific Reference Conditions for Surface Water Body Types
“For each characterized surface water body type (see 3.1.3.2 Characterization of Surface Water Body Types) type-specific hydromorphological and physicochemical conditions have to be established representing the values of the hydromorphological and physicochemical quality elements for that surface water body type at high ecological status (see Appendix A).
Furthermore, type-specific biological reference conditions are determined that illustrate the values of the biological quality elements for that surface water body type at high ecological status (see Appendix A).
If the procedures set out in this section are applied to heavily modified or artificial surface water bodies they do not refer to the high ecological status but to the maximum ecological potential (see Appendix A). The values for the maximum ecological potential for a water body have to be reviewed every six years.
Type-specific reference conditions can either be spatially based or based on modelling, or are derived using a combination of these methods. Where it is not possible to use these methods, Member States can call on expert judgements to establish such conditions.
Where reliable type-specific reference conditions for a quality element in a surface water body type cannot be established due to high degrees of natural variability in that element, not just as a result of seasonal variations, it is possible to exclude that element from the assessment of ecological status for that surface water type. In such circumstances Member States have to state the reasons for this exclusion in the river basin management plan”
(European Commission 2000).
3.1.3.4 Protected Areas
“The Member States have to register all areas located within each river basin district which are requiring special protection under specific Community legislation for the protection of the surface water and groundwater or for the conservation of habitats and species directly depending on water within four years after the date of entry into force of the Directive” (see Appendix A, European Commission 2000).
3.1.3.5 Pressures and their Impacts
The Member States are bound to collect and store data about the type and the dimension of significant anthropogenic pressures on surface water bodies which are:
- pollution from urban, industrial, agricultural and other installations and activities - water extraction for urban, industrial, agricultural and other uses (including
seasonal variations, total annual demand, and the loss of water in distribution systems)
- water flow regulation and its impact on overall flow characteristics and water balances (including water transfer and diversion)
- morphological alterations - land use patterns
- other significant anthropogenic impacts
This information, together with existing data, is used to assess the probability that the water bodies do not attain the environmental quality objectives (cf. European Commission 2000).
3.1.3.6 Surface Water Status
For the assessment of the ecological status of surface water bodies a catalogue of quality elements and definitions has been worked out (European Commission 2000, see Table A-2:
Normative definitions of ecological status classifications, Appendix A).
Table 16: Quality elements for the classification of the ecological status of rivers.
(European Commission 2000)
Composition and abundance of aquatic flora Composition and abundance of benthic invertebrate fauna
Biological elements
Composition, abundance and age structure of fish fauna
Hydrological regime:
- quantity and dynamics of water flow - connection to groundwater bodies River continuity
Hydromorphological elements supporting the biological elements
Morphological conditions:
- river depth and width variation
- structure and substrate of the river bed - structure of the riparian zone
General:
- Thermal conditions - Oxygenation conditions - Salinity
- Acidification status - Nutrient conditions Chemical and physicochemical
elements supporting the biological elements
Specific pollutants:
- Pollution by all priority substances identified as being discharged into the body of water
- Pollution by other substances identified as being discharged in significant quantities into the body of water
3.1.3.7 Monitoring Programmes
The Member States have to control the ecological and chemical status of surface water, groundwater and protected areas. For this purpose monitoring programmes are designed in order to establish a coherent and comprehensive overview of water status within each river basin district for the duration of a river basin management plan (see Appendix A):
Surveillance monitoring programmes:
The information of these monitoring programmes is used to develop future monitoring programmes with a higher quality, to assess the longterm changes of natural conditions and the changes caused by human activities, and to complete and validate the impact assessment procedure.
Operational monitoring programmes:
Operational monitoring is executed to determine the status of water bodies that potentially fail the environmental objectives and to evaluate the changes of the status of such water bodies resulting from the programmes of measures.
Investigative monitoring programmes:
Investigative monitoring programmes are applied when the reason for transgression are unknown and to observe the dimension and impacts of unintended pollution. Additionally, where surveillance monitoring shows that the environmental objectives cannot be reached and operational monitoring has not already been designed to detect the causes of a water body failing to achieve the environmental objectives.
The frequencies of monitoring are depending on quality elements and the water body type.
The monitoring frequencies for hydromorphological quality elements of rivers are 6 years for continuity, continuous for hydrology, and 6 years for morphology (cf. European Commission 2000).
3.1.3.8 Classification of Ecological Status and Ecological Potential
The ecological status of assessed and monitored surface water bodies is classified with the help of a scale with 5 levels (see Table 17). The Member States have to prepare a map for each river basin district presenting the ecological status with the help of the correct colour code (European Commission 2000).
Table 17: Classification of ecological status and corresponding colour codes.
(European Commission 2000)
Ecological Status Classification Colour Code
1: high Blue
2: good Green
3: moderate Yellow
4: poor Orange
5: bad Red
In the case of heavily modified and artificial water bodies a scale with 4 levels is used for the classification. The illustration on a map is carried out with different colour codes depending on the type of water body:
Table 18: Classification of ecological potential and corresponding colour codes.
(European Commission 2000)
Colour Code Ecological Potential
Classification Artificial Water Bodies Heavily Modified Water Bodies
Good and above Equal green and light grey stripes
Equal green and dark grey stripes
Moderate Equal yellow and light grey stripes
Equal yellow and dark grey stripes
Poor Equal orange and light grey
stripes
Equal orange and dark grey stripes
Bad Equal red and light grey
stripes
Equal red and dark grey stripes
3.1.3.9 Programmes of Measures
Each Member State is obligated to establish a programme of measures for each river basin district taking account of the results of the analyses and reviews mentioned before (see 3.1.3.1 River Basin Districts) in order to achieve the environmental objectives (see 3.1.2 Environmental Objectives) at the latest nine years after the date of entry into force of the WFD and all the measures shall be made operational at the latest 12 years after that date.
The programmes of measures are reviewed, and if necessary updated at the latest 15 years after the date of entry into force of the WFD and every six years thereafter (cf. European Commission 2000).
3.1.3.10 River Basin Management Plans
The Member States have to develop river basin management plans for every river basin district and publish them within nine years after the date of entry into force of the WFD. The management plans are reviewed and updated every six years (see Appendix A).
Concerning river basin management plans the WFD provides a public information and consultation which means that:
- “a timetable and work programme for the production of the plan, including a statement of the consultation measures to be taken,
- an interim overview of the significant water management issues identified in the river basin, and
- draft copies of the river basin management plan”,
3.1.3.11 Commission Report
The Commission has to “publish a report on the implementation of the Water Framework Directive at the latest 12 years after the date of entry into force of the Directive and every six years thereafter that is submitted to the European Parliament and to the Council”.
This report includes:
- “a review of progress in the implementation of the Directive
- a review of the status of surface water and groundwater in the Community undertaken in coordination with the European Environment Agency;
- a survey of the river basin management plans including suggestions for the improvement of future plans;
- a summary of the response to each of the reports or recommendations to the Commission made by Member States;
- a summary of any developed proposals, control measures and strategies;
- a summary of the responses to comments made by the European Parliament and the Council on previous implementation reports”.
In case of “breaches of the national provisions” concerning the implementation of the WFD, the Member States determine “effective, proportionate, and dissuasive penalties”.
The Water Framework Directive entered into force when it was published in the Official Journal of the European Communities on 22 December 2000. The Member States had to enforce the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with the Water Framework Directive at the latest 22 December 2003 (cf. European Commission 2000).
“Member States may not always reach good water status for all water bodies of a river basin district by 2015, for reasons of technical feasibility, disproportionate costs or natural conditions. Under such conditions that have to be specifically explained in the RBMPs, the Water Framework Directive offers the possibility to Member States to engage into two further six- year cycles of planning and implementation of measures until 2021 respectively 2027”
(CIS 2002).