Ñ. Ç. ÜËÚËÌ, Ä. à. äð‡ÒÌÓ‚, Ä. Ç. òẨðËÍ
314.74
-,
-.
1990
2015 . ,
-,
,
--
-.
,
-,
( ), ,
( ),
,
, , .
-,
-.
К : , -,
,
-, ,
,
,
-,
-.
-åàÉêÄñàéççõÖ ëÇüáà
ÖÇêéèõ:
èêéëíêÄçëíÇÖççé-
ÇêÖåÖççõÖ
íêÄçëîéêåÄñàà
Ñ.
Ç. ÜËÚËÌ
*Ä.
à. äð‡ÒÌÓ‚
*Ä.
Ç. òẨðËÍ
**
-
199034, , - , . 7/9.
19.02.2016 .
doi: 10.5922/2074-9848-2016-2-6
,
2500 ,
IV—VII . . .
,
, ,
. , ,
« » —
-,
-,
-. , XI .
,
XIX . (XI—XIV .),
, ,
.
.
,
-.
,
-,
-- .
,
-.
,
,
.
-. ,
; , ,
-, .
.
.
-.
-.
, .
. « »,
[13].
. . , «
» [9, . 10—11],
1990 2015 . 1
1,6 .
,
, .
244 76,2 — 31% —
.
— , , ,
25% [2].
.
-,
, [1; 9; 18].
,
:
1) , —
( , ,
-, ) [14; 20];
2) , —
-.
:
) : ( )
( ),
[16; 17];
) ( - ,
-):
- ,
-,
, .
[15];
) ( ):
-( ).
, ,
. ,
,
-,
.
[12; 19; 21].
1
-, ,
,
-, , .
—
, .
-,
,
: « , , — ».
-,
1990 .
-.
.
,
« »
-.
( )
-,
.
-,
-, .
,
-.
-, ,
[2].
äÓ˝ÙÙˈËÂÌÚ ðÂÁÛθڇÚË‚ÌÓÒÚË ÏÂʉÛ̇ðÓ‰ÌÓÈ ÏË„ð‡ˆËË (äêåå)
-2
,
-, .
,
2
100 . . , ,
.
40 ; « - » ( , ,
-, , ). ( ,
, , —
-.
= / ,
— ; — .
2015 .
28%, 1,28.
-. 1,2
15 ,
-. ,
,
-, ( . 1).
-, , , , ,
-,
, 3—5 . ,
-, ,
-,
— 2015-
1,5 2. ,
-.
, 1990 ., , ,
( — 0,9 0,4 ) [2].
. 1. ( )
, 2015 .
, ,
- , ,
-. 17
.
- .3
,
—
, , .
10 50
-,
4.
0,8 1,2,
, ,
,
-.
8 ,
-. : ,
-, , . ,
,
, .
,
,
. , «
-»
-,
« » . ,
-, ,
[8].
-, — [6].
3
-, ( , ,
, ) ; — ,
, , , , , ,
; — , , , ,
-, ; - — , ,
-, , , , , , ,
-; — , , , , , ,
, — , .
4
, 1990 . -.
. ,
, ,
3,8 4,9 ( 1990 . — 1,3 3,5) ( . 1).
,
.
4,8 ,
.
,
,
-, , .
, . 80- .
-,
.
— ,
-. 1990 -.
, . 2015 .
,
, [2].
-, ,
. , XIX — XX .
,
, , , , .
, —
. (
-)
-.
.
( ),
( , , ) — ,
-, .
. ( , , ), ,
1990 2015 . 3—6,
— 11 .
.
( 1990 .
-, ,
-, ,
[7], ,
.
ì‰ÂθÌ˚È ‚ÂÒ ËÏÏË„ð‡ÌÚÓ‚ (ìÇà) ‚ Ó·˘ÂÈ ˜ËÒÎÂÌÌÓÒÚË Ì‡ÒÂÎÂÌËfl
.
( ) .
-. , , ,
, ,
, 10% ,
.
« »
.
-, , .
,
-,
( . 2). ,
,
-.
11%
, [2].
. 2.
, 2015
,
.
40 1990 2015 .
6,8 10,3%5,
.
,
-,
, , , , , .
« »
1% ,
2 12,7% .
— XXI .
,
[11].
,
.
-,
. , ,
— 7—
20%. ( , , , , ,
) —
30 75%. , (
-, , )
:
-, « » — [24].
1990 2015 . ,
— (1944—1957 .)
,
6.
,
, — 8,1%
5
1990 .
2015 .,
,
1990 . .
6
1944—1947 . -
( ),
. ,
.
1,3 (
. ,
,
[2].
,
, .
, — ,
, —
-, —
-, — 74%. 1990 .
- ,
( . 1).
-, , , , — .
1
Ƚɨɫɭɞɚɪɫɬɜɚȿɜɪɨɩɵɫɧɚɢɛɨɥɶɲɟɣɱɢɫɥɟɧɧɨɫɬɶɸɷɦɢɝɪɚɧɬɨɜ ɢɢɦɦɢɝɪɚɧɬɨɜɜ 1990- 2015 ɝɝ.
. .
%
-- T . .
%
-1990 2015 12 750 8,6 10 577 7,4
5 575 10,8 5 826 13,0 4 070 7,0 4 917 7,6
3 497 6,1 4 450 12,2 3 471 4,4 4 045 5,0
1 919 19,4 3 408 17,5 1 892 18,4 2 901 4,8 1 628 4,3 2 306 22,3
1 464 3,8 2 146 3,3
1 305 12,5
1 651 43,3
1990 2015 11 525 7,8 12 006 14,9
6 893 13,3 11 643 8,1 5 936 7,5 8 543 13,1 5 897 10,4 7 784 12,1
3 662 6,3 5 853 12,7 1 428 2,5 5 789 9,7
1 392 20,7 4 835 10,8 1 249 12,2 2 439 29,4
1 192 8,0 1 979 11,7 1 128 3,0 1 640 16,8
, ,
, — ,
, , , —
, 7,8% ( ) 14,9% ( ).
-, ,
. ,
,
. ,
, , 2008 .
,
.
[10].
àÌÚÂÌÒË‚ÌÓÒÚ¸ ÏË„ð‡ˆËÓÌÌ˚ı ÔðÓˆÂÒÒÓ‚ (àåè)
,
( ) ( ) .
( ),
7.
= ( + ) / · 100,
— ; — ; —
.
. .
-,
-. ,
-, .
,
-.
-,
[4; 5; 9].
1990 .
-, ,
« ». 13 ,
20%
7
(
-) , ,
( ),
, ( , ,
-, , ), ( ,
), .
« » ( , , ,
-), « » ( , ) ( . 3).
( , , ,
, , )
. ,
-, ( , ,
-, )
.
— , —
, [2].
. 3. ( )
, 1990 .
[2].
,
-. 10%
( , ,
-), —
. ( ,
-, , , , ),
,
1990 .
-.
13,6 18,4%.
-. (9,6%)
— ,
-, ,
.
22 40
20% , 13 —
30% ( . 4).
. 4. ( )
, 2015 .
[2].
2015 .
(55%), (44%),
(41%), (37%), (35%). 80- .
,
, ,
. ,
,
: (
— 7 .
, ,
— .
—
( ).
—
12% 1990 . ( 1—4 ).
-. , 90- .
—
,
-,
,
[3].
ë‚Ӊ̇fl ÚËÔÓÎÓ„Ëfl ÒÚð‡Ì Ö‚ðÓÔ˚ ÔÓ ı‡ð‡ÍÚÂðÛ ÏË„ð‡ˆËÓÌÌ˚ı ÔðÓˆÂÒÒÓ‚
( . 5).
. 5. , 2015 .
. —
( ) —
.
( )
, , 0,4,
, , 16%
. 10 ,
( . 2).
, , ,
-1/
3 .
2
Ɍɢɩɨɥɨɝɢɹɝɨɫɭɞɚɪɫɬɜȿɜɪɨɩɵɩɨɯɚɪɚɤɬɟɪɭɦɢɝɪɚɰɢɨɧɧɵɯɩɪɨɰɟɫɫɨɜ
I , ,
, ,
-,
, ,
, ,
(10)
( < 0,4); (
16% ,
-) .
.
( 8 10) , —
( ) ( )
II , ,
, ,
, ,
, ,
-, (10)
(
0,6 1,2)
( > 20%).
—
( , , )
( , , , )
III , ,
, ,
(5)
(
<15%);
.
IV , ,
-, ,
-, ,
, ,
, ,
,
-, , ,
(15)
( 14 24%),
— .
-( >1,4);
9,7 ( ) 44 ( )
, ,
-. , ,
— ,
, , ,
-.
( , , , , )
( , , ) ,
12%
-. ,
(38 2015 .) — 8-
-, — , 90- .
« »
[2].
, «
», ,
( 0,6 1,2)
( 20%).
-, .
— , —
«
-», .
, ,
.
-, ( )
( . 2).
-.
« » « » —
, , , —
( . 2).
«
-» .
, 90- . —
-.
,
-. ,
-, .
.
,
, ,
(11,6 .)
(10,6 .)
,
15 [2].
,
. 15
.
,
( 1,4)
( . 3).
-, —
.
29 44 ( . 6).
3
Ƚɨɫɭɞɚɪɫɬɜɚȿɜɪɨɩɵɫɧɚɢɛɨɥɶɲɢɦɭɞɟɥɶɧɵɦɜɟɫɨɦɷɦɢɝɪɚɧɬɨɜ ɢɢɦɦɢɝɪɚɧɬɨɜɜɨɛɳɟɣɱɢɫɥɟɧɧɨɫɬɢɧɚɫɟɥɟɧɢɹɜ 1990—2015 ɝɨɞɚɯ
%
-- . .
%
-- . .
1990 2015
31,9 113
43,3 1 651
26,5 927 38,8 1 123
24,1 164 24,8 516
20,6 887 24,6 103
19,4 1 919 22,3 2 306 18,4 1 892 22,0 138
17,8 360 21,8 889
15,3 669 20,4 865
12,5 1 305 18,9 544 10,8 5 575 18,8 882
1990 2015 29,8 114 43,9 249
24,3 382 29,4 2 439 24,2 646 17,5 1 492
20,7 1 392 16,8 1 640 13,3 6 893 16,8 196
13,3 579 15,9 746
12,2 1 249 15,4 202 10,4 5 897 14,9 12 006
10,3 793 14,2 742
9,9 475 13,6 577
. 6. , 2015 .
[2].
, ,
-, .
-. 1990 2015 .
,
, , , , .
,
-, , 7 830
. 5,85 ( . . 1).
Ç˚‚Ó‰˚
,
,
- ,
— 1990 .
57% , 2015 . 67%.
21%
-
-.
2 ,
, , 4 6 .
— ,
, ,
16—17%.
,
-. 1990 2015 . ,
,
49 76 .
.
( )
-, , ,
, , .
-,
,
( ),
-8 ,
3,5—5,0 1. 82%
,
-, , — ,
-, , , .
« »
-. 1990 .
8,7
( ) ( 20,7 29,4%), — 9,4 ( 6,5
15,9%), — 9,6 ( 4,6 14,2%), —
10,3 ( 6,5 16,8%), — 10,6 ( 2,1 12,7%),
— 14,1 ( 29,8 43,9%).
15%,
.
8
2015—2016 .,
-. ,
-. ,
,
.
( ), ,
33 40
( . . 3, 4).
-,
-.
, ,
« ».
—
. ,
-. .
-: « . ».
-.
-.
— .
. ?
-.
1. . .
// . 2003. №3—4. . 15—22.
2. .
: [ ]. URL: http://www.un.org/en/
development/desa/population/migration/data/estimates2/estimates15.shtml ( -: 29.01.2016.)
3. . .
1991—2010 . // .- .
2012. . 4, . 7. . 135—145.
4. . . ,
( ) // :
— : №292. ., 2013.
5. . . :
// . 2014. №2 (58). . 106—120.
6. . ., . .
//
. . . 2011. . 1. . 131—137.
7. . .
XXI : // -
-. - . 2012.
№1(1). . 258—268.
8. . . :
// . 2014.
№3. . 95—106.
9. . . ,
//
-. 2013-. №4. . 10—38.
10. . . //
-. 2015-. №9. . 80—92.
11. . ., . ., . .
( ) // -
-. - . 2014. №3.
. 79—89.
12.Boyd M. Family and personal networks in international migration: recent developments and new agendas // International Migration Review. 1989. Vol. 23, is. 3. P. 638—670.
13.Castles S. Migration and community formation under conditions of global-ization // International Migration Review. 2002. Vol. 36, is. 4. P. 1143—1168.
14.Castles S. Towards a sociology of forced migration and social transforma-tion // Sociology. 2003. Vol. 37, is. 1. P. 13—34.
15.Chiswick B.R., Miller P.W. A model of destination-language acquisition: Application to male immigrants in Canada // Demography. 2001. Vol. 38, is. 3. P. 391—409.
16.Crozet M. Do migrants follow market potentials? An estimation of a new economic geography model // Journal of Economic Geography. 2004. Vol. 4, is. 4. P. 439—458.
17.Hämäläinen K., Böckerman P. Regional labor market dynamics, housing and migration // Journal of Regional Science. 2004. Vol. 44, is. 3. P. 543—568.
18.Hooghe M., Trappers A., Meuleman B., Reeskens T. Migration to European countries: A structural explanation of patterns, 1980—2004 // International Migra-tion Review. 2008. Vol. 42, is. 2. P. 476—504.
19.Kofman E. Family-related migration: A critial review of European studies // Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies. 2004. Vol. 30, is. 2. P. 243—262.
20.Schmeidl S. Exploring the causes of forced migration: A pooled time-series analysis, 1971—1990 // Social Science Quarterly. 1997. Vol. 78. is. 2. P. 284—308.
21.Shuval J.T. Diaspora migration: Definitional ambiguities and a theoretical paradigm // International Migration. 2000. Vol. 38, is. 5. P. 41—57.
22.Ueffing P., Rowe F., Mulder C.H. Differences in attitudes towards immigra-tion between Australia and Germany: The role of immigraimmigra-tion policy // Comparative Population Studies. 2015. Vol. 40, is. 4. P. 437—465.
24.Zhitin D.V. Regional Aspects of Migration Flows in the Russian Federation //
Regional Research of Russia. 2012. Vol. 2, №4. P. 319—328.
, ,
-,
-, .
E-mail: zhitin_dv@mail.ru
,
, -
-, .
E-mail: antonkrasnov@rambler.ru
,
,
-, .
E-mail: shen@mail.ru
Ⱦɥɹɰɢɬɢɪɨɜɚɧɢɹ:
. ., . ., . . :
- // . 2016. . 8,
№2. . 101—124. doi: 10.5922/2074-9848-2016-2-6.
MIGRATION FLOWS IN EUROPE: SPACE AND TIME TRANSFORMATION
D. Zhitin* A. Krasnov* A. Shendrik*
*
Saint-Petersburg State University
7—9, Universitetskaya nab., St. Petersburg, 199034, Russia
Submitted on February 19, 2016
the gap between source and recipient countries but, on the contrary, it has made it more pronounced over the recent decades. The article presents an attempt at classi-fying European countries by the direction and intensity of migration connections and stresses the impact of international migration on the demographic and sociocul-tural situation in different European states.
Key words: immigration, emigration, net migration rate, intensity of migration, Europe, regions and countries, migration flow.
References
1. Anohin, A.A. 2003, Osobennosti globalizacii i regionalizacii v sovremennom mire, Regional'naya ehkologiya, no. 3—4, p. 15—22.
2. United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs. Population Divi-sion, 2016, available at: http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/migration/ data/estimates2/estimates15.shtml (accessed 16 January 2016).
3. Zhitin, D.V. 2012, Prostranstvennaya neodnorodnost' migracionnogo dviz-heniya Rossii v 1991—2010 gg. [Spatial heterogeneity of Russian migration move-ment in 1991—2010 gg.], Vestnik S.-Peterb. Un-ta. Ser. 7 [Bulletin of St. Peters-burg. Univ.], no. 4, p. 135—145.
4. Kamkin, A.K. 2013, Demograficheskie processy, migraciya i rynok truda v Zapadnoj Evrope (na primere FRG) [Demographic processes, migration and the la-bor market in Western Europe (on an example of Germany)]. In: Gromyko, Al. A. Bol'shaya Evropa v global'nom mire: novye vyzovy — novye resheniya (pod red.), Doklady Instituta Evropy, no. 292, Moscow, p. 103—110.
5. Karpov, G.A. 2014, Velikobritaniya: demografiya protiv migrantov i mul'ti-kul'turalizma [UK: population against migrants and multiculturalism], Sovremen-naya Evropa, [Modern Europe], no. 2, p. 106—120.
6. Kuznetsova, T. Yu., Fedorov, G.M. 2011, Territorial'naya differenciaciya demograficheskogo razvitiya Baltijskogo makroregiona [Territorial differentiation of demographic development in the Baltic macro-region], Vestnik Baltijskogo fed-eral'nogo universiteta im. I. Kanta [Vestnik Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal Unver-sity], no 1, p. 131—137, available at: http://journals.kantiana. ru/upload/iblock/41b/ ebnuetkkddaulovedo,%20gm.%20re.%20vptcaxeshiuudy.pdf (accessed 17.11.2013). 7. Lachininskij, S.S. 2012, Evolyuciya ehkonomicheskogo prostranstva Rossii v nachale XXI veka: geoehkonomicheskij podhod [Evolution of the Russian eco-nomic space at the beginning of the century XXI: geo-ecoeco-nomic approach], Vestnik Associacii rossijskih geografov-obshchestvovedov [Bulletin of Russian geographers, social scientists Association], no. 1, p. 258—268.
8. Mezhevich, N.M. 2014, Borders and Identity in Theory and Practice of the Eastern Baltic Region, Balt. Reg., no. 3, p. 95—106. DOI: 10.5922/2079-8555-2014-3-7.
9. Evropu, ehkonomicheskij krizis i nekotorye voprosy teorii migracii [Europe, economic crisis and some problems of migration theory], 2012, Aktual'nye problemy Evropy [Actual problems of Europe], no. 4 p. 10—38.
10.Ponedelko, G.N. 2015, Immigraciya v Ispanii [Immigration in Spain], Mi-rovaya ehkonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya [World Economy and Interna-tional Relations], no. 9, p. 80—92.
12.Boyd, M. 1989, Family and personal networks in international migration: recent developments and new agendasm, International Migration Review, T. 23, Vol. 3, p. 638—670.
13.Castles, S. 2002, Migration and community formation under conditions of globalization, International Migration Review, T. 36, Vol. 4, p. 1143—1168.
14.Castles, S. 2003, Towards a sociology of forced migration and social trans-formation, Sociology, T. 37, Vol. 1, p. 13—34.
15.Chiswick, B.R., Miller, P.W. 2001, A model of destination-language acqui-sition: Application to male immigrants in Canada, Demography, T. 38, Vol. 3, p. 391—409.
16.Crozet, M. 2004. Do migrants follow market potentials? An estimation of a new economic geography model, Journal of Economic Geography, T. 4, Vol. 4, p. 439—458.
17.Hämäläinen, K., Böckerman, P. 2004, Regional labor market dynamics, housing and migration, Journal of Regional Science, T. 44, Vol. 3, p. 543—568.
18.Hooghe, M., Trappers, A., Meuleman, B., Reeskens, T. 2008, Migration to European countries: A structural explanation of patterns, 1980—2004, International Migration Review, T. 42, Vol. 2, p. 476—504.
19.Kofman, E. 2004, Family-related migration: A critial review of European studies, Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, T. 30, Vol. 2, p. 243—262.
20.Schmeidl, S. 1997, Exploring the causes of forced migration: A pooled ti-me-series analysis, 1971—1990, Social Science Quarterly, T. 78, Vol. 2, p. 284—308. 21.Shuval, J.T. 2000, Diaspora migration: Definitional ambiguities and a theo-retical paradigm, International Migration, T. 38, Vol. 5, p. 41—57.
22.Ueffing, P., Rowe, F., Mulder, C.H. 2015, Differences in attitudes towards immigration between Australia and Germany: The role of immigration policy, Com-parative Population Studies, T. 40, Vol. 4, p. 437—465.
23.Weber, H. 2015, National and regional proportion of immigrants and per-ceived threat of immigration: A three-level analysis in Western Europe, Interna-tional Journal of Comparative Sociology, T. 56, Vol. 2, p. 116—140.
24.Zhitin, D.V. 2012, Regional Aspects of Migration Flows in the Russian Federation, Regional Research of Russia, T. 2, Vol. 4, p. 319—328.
About the authors
Dr Dmitry Zhitin, Associate Professor, the Department of Human Geography, Saint-Petersburg State University, Russia.
E-mail: zhitin_dv@mail.ru
Anton Krasnov, Senior Lecturer, the Department of Human Geography, Saint-Pe-tersburg State University, Russia.
E-mail: antonkrasnov@rambler.ru
Alexander Shendrik, Lecturer, the Department of Human Geography, Saint-Pe-tersburg State University, Russia.
E-mail: shen@mail.ru
To cite this article:
