/
1389 / 34 / 2
!
"# $%
& " % ' (
)&
* + , - ./ & 0
* # 2 3 4
** # 5 4 3 ***
* ! "
** #
*** #
% 6 4 7 4 * :
15 / 1 / 89 > ?! 7 4 * :
1 / 3 / 89
2 A
:
. " # $ % & '
' ( )
* + ,
' % -('
. /
." 0 1 ' 0 2
3 4 ) 0 3 5
.
> 4 B :
$ % 67
8
' ( )
92 0 0 ." 0 1
'
; < 2 $
= >
1) ? ' 0 @ >
. A" ' BC D C
' * E F
50 %
% -('
2 / 0 % 1 / 0 %
. / '
1 %
. L = > 0 C)
. 48 3* O ' L
P"Q @ R O
0 1 @ . '
R 0 = 7
-5
SPSS
? )
' )
S %
3 5 1 L T >7 -67 .
$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
# ## # %& ' ( )* ( :
,- . %! " % %
: 8220031 $ 0391
E-mail: m.yaghooti@yahoo.com
Comparison of Antimicrobial Effects of Persica® and Chlorhexidine with Sodium Hypochlorite on Enterococcus Fecalis and Candida Albicans: An In vitro study
MohammadMehdi YaghootiKhorasani*#, Sepideh Assar**, Omid RezaHoseini***
* Assistant Professor, Dept of Endodontics, Dental School, Rafsanjan University of Medical Sciences, Rafsanjan, Iran. ** Dental Student, Rafsanjasn University of Medical Sciences, Rafsanjan, Iran.
*** Medical Student, Rafsanjasn University of Medical Sciences, Rafsanjan, Iran.
Received: 4 April 2010; Accepted: 22 May 2010
Introduction: Generally, a material with less toxicity and greater antimicrobial effect seems more agreeable to use. The aim of this study was in vitro comparison of the antimicrobial effects of Persica® and Chlorhexidine with Sodium hypochlorite on Enterococcus fecalis and Candida albicans.
Materials & Methods: In this in vitro experimental study, 92 samples of study microorganisms were cultured on meuller hinton agar with Kirby bauer method. Paper discs were treated by Persica (pure and 50%), Chlorhexidine (0.1% and 0.2%) and Sodium hypochlorite 1% and placed on the culture media. After 48 hours incubation, Zones of microbial inhibition were measured in millimeters. Data were analyzed by Mann-Whitney and Kruskal-Wallis tests.
Results: Sodium hypochlorite was more effective in growth inhibition of the microorganisms than Persica and chlorhexidine significantly (P=0.000).
Conclusion: In this study, the microorganisms were very sensitive to Sodium hypochlorite. Reducing the concentration of Chlorhexidine, lessened its effectiveness. There was not any sensitivity to Persica. Totally used concentrations had less effect than Sodium hypochlorite.
Key words: Chlorhexidine, persica, sodium hypochlorite, enterococcus fecalis, candida albicans. #
##
#Corresponding Author: m.yaghooti@yahoo.com
)' :
D C 4"0 . / ' 5 D C ) D0
'
$ U * % -(' 5
." 0 1 @ V '
7 , $ )
000 / 0 P=
( .
& , C D ) :
$ % ." 0 1
' " . / ' 4"0 $ 0 2 "Q
.
% -(' D C Y'
." 0 1 "Q
' @ .
@ 0 Z "Q *
.
D C U
' / ' " # $
[ $ , .
@ 7
.
E 2 , , :
3 4 ) 0 3 5 2 0 . / ' * % -('
.
/ 1389 34
/ 2 : 60 " 153 .
! "
# $#%& ' '
(&
) * % %
. ) 1 (
/0 # 1 2 * (& 3 ' 4 & 5"
6 78 ' 9 : : ; ' <= :
*> # & * ? @ $ A ' 4 & 5" (& .
) 2 ( % 4 C= D E
A E " ! F #?
G : 9 ? 6 ,
3E" #%& 9 ? ' * @ / I0
50 %
. ) 3 (
) &6 N E" 6 ' 70 O 5= #
P Q ' N P R : ' #? S # /
' .
) 4 ( G ?' P P70 6 P%U
' E
6 '
/P P #P ='
P * P%" #%& 9 ?
6 P&6 PC" 6 ' PE
9 ? P #P%&
P
P #P%& P
2 / & :
( 9 : )
) / (
P P .
? A& V = 0 G ?'
! PQ P ) 6 P
/ W? #? / /XW P
G P?' P%E P
/ %
. ) 1 (
Y& V&6 & & ? 0 S 6 Z > / (& "
F& & ? [ > #7 ' # ' .
\ 6 [ >
(& 6 #? / / ] & ? N E
3 # 6 VE X=2 & ? 4 8 # #?
/0 & 9 70
. ) 5 ( /
[ > ^ #%& 9 ? & : 7
% ` Q
VE X=2 & ? 3 2 ( #? Y&
(& " #
/ Z >
. ) 2 (
G :
' 9 ? & ' 0 ? 6
/ * 6 9 ? *) #
a 3 = F& ' #%&
6 (& '
b EE?
/3 1 E G :
6 6
/ ) & /
. ) 6 ( A& 7? S #
b ' E % EE?
6 " 8 R) & 9 ?
? 5D d%? ' / * X> $
Q e= $ f ! '
' b
$ 2
$ > / > ' 9 X> *
# 1 E
. ) 4 ( (& 6 b
EE?
9 Q
17 ) # ! W? # " )
/ .
&' 6 ' #? / (& 6 & :
' = Q R ' ' / &
$ :
' N EC .
) 7 ( ' = Q
9 & a Z & G E /5" :
> % #? /
4 f 'g ' Q
6 h% : ' b
/
1389 / 34 / 2
dI .
) 8 (
h& Q #Z Q
Q j ) /7 # : #& %
# " * > $
# ) ? k "
' = R # : 6
: P ' 0 P
S =' P I > 4 g P
) 6 P j
' 3 2 ? " ' ' b
. ) 4 (
/ = C0 h& V * E0' 7? A& (& & h 7?
E # #? / Q ' b
EE? 3
6 EQ $ 8 l D Q :
/ EE?
EE? 3 ' ER Gg:
. ) 9 ' 7 ( (& $1 E & & ? b 4 > * = #
n X f ! '
A& E # / ! ' o S
/ l D 9 ? E %
. ) 10 ( (& & h 7?
p Q Q q
h F&
$ %) ' `6 $ & %Z V e" $
Y7 4 8 E A 4 f ' #W= V7
/ . ) 11 ( ' o 9 & ? 2 / 8 ) * = # & /& 7?
* 4 >
# " <= : /0 Q EE?
/ .
9 C (&
% (& "
9 ?
/ ) 12 (
<= : 6 r ' 6 /0 ? * s& S 6 '
! F 9 ? % *
. 6 X& C (&
Q ) ' #7
t e" ' ' *& '
# F / .
) 13 ( & /& 7?
9 ? ' ; # u / 7 >
' AZ ?
\ 9 ?
2 k "
# ) #
. ) 1 (
' #C= D
9 75 % E" '
5 / 0 %
? C" d ? & /& 7? #%& 9 ?
f .
) 15 ' 14 (
/ ( C" d& 62
?
`' ' b # /X
Disk diffusion ! F
' (& " 6 & #?
`6 `' (& "
# /X / ( C"
) A & `' ! # ' ' b
.
' Q A & `' 6 & 6
2 ! F / $
/ 7: *I ' * 2
$
6
s > Q
I # E& ' F& #=
?
/ !6o A & N X ' b 9 75
! " .
) 16 (
# & I $# @Q 4 C= D
# : ' b f
A& E
$9 X> * > ' b
b EE?
# 0 h 4 8 0 ? # 9 ?
/ . ) 17 ' 8 ( f # & I #C= D (&
4
2
& /& 7? (& & h 7? ' : 9 '
Q ' & ? ' V = 0 G ?'
(& h& ( 0 & /3 h%& 62 k 5 VE X=2
1 E
& /& 7? "
.
> 4 B
? / ( C" d& 62
# /X
`' ' b
Disk diffusion ! F
.
(& F" #C= D w
%& 62 h A & 6 @r ?
' 1 E & I # # %r2 #? & Q 0 8
6 RU% : #& %
) & $ 3" $ E : (
$
& /& 7? ' (& & h 7? #& % .
*?
V = 0 x ? ?' ?
> ' & ? [
F S # VE X=2 92
> A & )
' Q 18 'g # A & 2
E 9 E? A & (
. k 5
Q2 E = /%?
(Merck KGaA, Darmstadt,
Germany)
W? / ( C" / " o C
?
1 E U ' E ! Q ' /XW ! Q
/ . (&
V = 0 x ? ?' ? 6 #C= D
)
& E ? 1394
( VE X=2 & ? [ > ' )
& E 5027 ( ? # F 6 #?
'
[ >
& ' CE8
) PTCC ( (& $ # 3"
a' /%? k 5 '
Tryptic soy broth
(Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany) # =' W " /3
Q2 E = /%? k 5 6 V /%?
#=' & E7? ( )
A" ( .
4
@Q " 18
# 37
V: ' h #
Q ' (& 6 A" E7? / 6
$ 3 2
9 I y = & 0 ! V '
`' x
# z= ) Q ' 6 " ' ? ] ?
E= 0 A '
)
' 7? ' A& = 6 S 7U
" ' ? #? ! &
108
× 5 / 1
Q '
7
E C C" ? # ' ? F& =
d& 62 ?
. ) 18 ( ( & F & Q . 6
? s 7C" (& 5D /%? ! F
.
#XE: a A& b l S
# *&
Y& ' ' 0 Q ' ' 9 75 *)
#= = 7) #X= # %0 0 b
; ) d& 62
`' # Q2 E = / 7: |D a V
Spread plate /%?
|D ! " #? S #
? # # %r2 k 5 .
/ 7: 4 # /%?
2
" 5 #I > # @Q /?
a@ 3 2 / S "
Q . A & /\7r & I @r ?
:
) ' z= ) 50
(% $ (& & h 7? )
2 / 0 % ' 1 / 0 (% '
& /& 7? )
1 (% # %r2 ( @Q 6 V: '
/%? k 5 ' /> A%) ' ? 3 2
> / 7: *)
Q2 |D 2 # '
Q2 x " A & ! " " E %Q %0 .
A & 6 #C= D (& A g
) ' 0 8 @r ?
' b
(
E 9 E? E #
. /\7r
4 C= D x 6 # 0 Q ? #
a U 7X> .
) 3 (
4 # @Q " 6 V:
18 ' /
37
D> h #
#= ! )
& R" 1 (
7 1 6
}& ' Q
/Xf / = AZ
. ) 19 (
' #& % 6 /> d& 0
b EE?
5
2 ( h ' /%?
# & I ' #X 5 Q
& . f #C= D (& 2
N
b A& ' #& % ?u EE?
A& '
? N [ > N A& '
5 " EC&
9 75 6 ! ? 5
E 0 Q > .
*?
23 ! F /%? )
/\7r ' Q '
5
3 2 ? AZ ' / /3 / 7:
2
A & ? # ' / 7:
A& ' ' / 7:
& Q ?
(. ! k "
0 SPSS
#7 ' # ' d& &'
62 2
( A& : r
E &'
V = ' 9 ' ? '
' #& F"
E 0 Q > * 75" .
R" & 1 : & ! #= 6
/ 1389 / 34 / 2 )'
V = 0 x ? ?' ? #C= D (&
'
F S # VE X=2 & ? [ > 92
> A &
) ' Q 18
A & 'g # 2
9 E? A &
E (. A g A & '
) E 9 E? ( d& 62 ! #= % % .
& /& 7? 6 # 0 ? # /\7r 2 \ 6
/\7r # /X #
(& & h 7? 6 # 0 ? S #
EC P
Q ' 3
#C= D " f ) 000 / 0 P= (. #& %
/\7r ' :
# • # 0 ?
V = 0 x ? ?' 3 f "
(& & h 7? ' / VE X=2 & ? '
2 / 0 % 6 " f
/\7r 1 / 0 % 2 .
g ) ! F V = ' 9 ' ? 62
#X" ( h
# 2 / #
' b
(& & h 7? 2
/ 0 % (& & h 7? $ 1
/ 0 %
/& 7? '
& 1 % 001 / 0 P<
EC 2 \ 6 '
) 9' 1 ' 2 (. 9' 1 : 62 }& Mann-Whitney ! #= D>
V = 0 x ? ?' ?
' b
' b
#X" Y
#X" ( h
Z
P
(& & h 7? 2
/ 0 %
(& & h 7? 1 / 0 % 483 183 83 / 26 17 / 10 875 / 4 w 001 / 0
(& & h 7? 2
/ 0 %
& /& 7? 1 % 171 495 5 / 9 5 / 27 255 / 5 w 001 / 0
(& & h 7? 1
/ 0 %
& /& 7? 1 % 171 495 5 / 9 5 / 27 26 / 5 w 001 / 0 9' 2 : 62 }& Mann-Whitney ! #= D>
VE X=2 & ? [ >
' b
' b
#X" Y
#X" ( h
Z
P
(& & h 7? 2
/ 0 %
(& & h 7? 1 / 0 % 495 171 5 / 27 5 / 9 205 / 5 w 001 / 0
(& & h 7? 2
/ 0 %
& /& 7? 1 % 171 495 5 / 9 5 / 27 253 / 5 w 001 / 0
(& & h 7? 1
/ 0 %
F/
: P G P 6 P ? P P %& 9 P 6 #
b EE?
"' 7? S # '
1 E
' b & ? 'g #? / "
? a U 4 f "o
. \E (&
9 II5
"' )
62 3 }& # .
#? 3 6 &
: P G P 6 #%& 9 ? /& 7?
&
b 2 9 C ' &6 ? /7 # #? /
# 0 Q \ E # #%& 9 ? ?
/ . /\7r 1 % 9 C S # & /& 7?
G : ? #%& 9 ? 6 .
) 20 ( # & I
#& % 6 #C= D (& & /& 7? (& & h 7?
b j ) #? / f Q EE?
'
#& % ( Ep
j ) /7 # #? : Q
> # " ? 4 ^ #F ' Q a 7D
/ # 0 Q &
. 9 C /\7r
(& & h 7? 2
/ 0 % / ) 20 (
%U f # E& '
/\7r /\7r 6 FE 2 6 ?
1 / 0 % 2
&
z= ) /\7r : '
) # =' € :
( /\7r ' 50
% 2
& > .
? V = 0 x ? ?'
6 &
Y& (& "
? #%& 9 ?
. ? (&
) 6 /XW ! Q '
# /%? k 5 '
#C= D (& ?
E? . ) 21 ( [ >
VE X=2 & ? Y&
(& "
9 ? [ >
#%& (& #?
#C= D [ > E # l S
/ a U
. ) 22 (
& P (& 6 *8 } P
' ? #? % #C= D
& /& 7? # /X #C= D [ >
x (& & h 7? # /X ' E
2 / 0 % 6
/\7r d ? ) 3 " * > /
6 (& & h 7?
#C= D [ > ' ? /
/ # ?
. /\7r 7? S #
& ? & /& 7? # & I #C= D (&
0 ? .
(& (& & h 7? 6 #78 }&
` Q }& #C= D
) 7X> 4 C= D
X Q6 .
#C= D
# 0 & '
%
d ? (& & h 7? ' & /& 7? #?
Q '
DI a2 6 " f 9 ? *)
. E7? C" #Z Q 6 ? & /& 7?
EC 2 O 5= 6 4' " (& (& & h 7?
X . ) 1 ( & ( Ep #C= D }
k " #?
' &'
! F g ) #? 17D (& h
EC 9 75 (
& /& 7? E %
5 / 2 % ' 25 / 2 % (& & h 7? ' ( = 9 $
d ?
Q ' 2 9 X # $9 ? *)
9 ? 6
/ '
. ) & 7? " f & / (
& /& 7? 1
% $ 9 0g ) (& & h 7? ' ( =
E h& &
. ) 3 ( White ' Jeansonne #C= D
& /& 7? 9 & ? 2 f '
25 / 5 % '
4 ? 7Q (& & h 7? 2
/ 0 % 4' " EC
#
' (& 6 /XW /%?
# EE? %
' / .
) 23 ( #C= D Giardino '
4 f
' b
(& & h 7? # & I & /& 7?
" (& ' %
EC 2 \ 6 4'
I7"
. ) 24 ( #C= D k " #? Ballal
9 '
2009
? #= (& h ! F
3 f #
/
1389 / 34 / 2
VE X=2 .
) 25 ( Wang
#C= D S '
? (& & h 7? a 77D ' b 4 f
? " V = 0 x ? ?' .
) 26 (
: # /X #C= D [ > ' ?
3 " * > /
$ %
/ = (&
: %U f % 4 C= D ^C #?
' ?
% V = 0 x ? ? .
Almas
9 1999 #C= D
2 f R 9 & ?
50 %
' V " x ? ? : ' : ' =
% V = 0 x ? ? : .
) 17 ( h& ) 6
4 C= D # % F&
#C= D '2 / # .
#& % % ' \ #C= D
/> (& & h 7? 2
/ 0 % $ 1 / 0 % $ 02 / 0 % ' 01 / 0 %
Q ' 6
$V ] h x ? ? :
]6 ? x 7 ?o' V " x ? ? :
k 5
/C /%? E?
.
: #& % #? =
/> 50 %
6 Q 7 # > ) z= ) /> '
Q ' X /%? k 5
. ) 4 (
, C D )&
( EZ #C= D 6 2 / # }& # # "
/ /\7r #?
4 X ? " 6 # 0 ? #
b
# & I s I5" (& '
x ? ?' ? 3 & /& 7?
6 ' X 0 ? VE X=2 & ? [ > ' V = 0
/\7r
3E% : E&2 4 C= D (& "o
.
# " : #& % h& 6
" /58 # # R •&
(& 6 ? #
Q ' • : ! /7 $9 75
\ # ' b 2 # /X #C= D .
* & B4 +
% '‚: ! 5 ^ 6 #7 ' (&
' FE 0 : ! 7 h%
#= >2 a E
7 /ƒ ^ f2
a' ' Q
E '
! 5 x E ? 2 ! 3 b >2 a E
a'
&6 4 6 l S (& #? E
9 ? *XI
& I" & %" ' .
G #
1. Hasheminiya SM, Havaee SA, Rajabi M. Antibacterial and substantivity evaluation of 2.5% sodium hypochlorite, 0.2% cholorehexidine and distilled water as root canal irrigants (In-vitro). The Journal of Islamic Dental Association of Iran 2005; 17(55): 38-45. (Persian)
2. Saberi EA, Ebrahimzadeh A, Ghanbari Phiroozabadi MH. The antifungal effect of sodium hypochlorite in infected root canals with Candida albicans. Tabib-e-Shargh 2004; 6(2): 115-121. (Persian)
3. Javidi M, Behravan J,Goudarzi M, Bagherpour Z.An in vitro evaluation of antimicrobial activity of NaClO and chlorhexidine as intracanal irrigants on streptococcus faecalis. J Mash Dent Sch 2007; 31(3): 177-82. (Persian) 4. Mozaffari B, Mansouri SH. Comparison of antibacterial and cytotoxic effects of Persica and chlorhixidine
mouthwashes in vitro. Journal of Dental School Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences 2006; 23(3): 494-509. (Persian)
5. Fani MM. Evaluation of treating effect of chlorhexidine 0.2% mouthrinse on Candida. Journal of Dentistry Shiraz University of Medical Sciences 2000; 2(2): 21-5. (Persian)
7. Fallahzadeh H, Mointaghavi A, Foruzanmehr M. Clinical comparison of Persica and Chlorhexidine mouthrinses using meta-analysis technique. The Journal of Islamic Dental Association of Iran 2006; 18(1): 62-72. (Persian) 8. al-Bagieh NH, Idowu A, Salako NO. Effect of aqueous extract of miswak on the in vitro growth of candida
albicans. Microbios 1994; 80(323): 107-13.
9. Lin S, Zuckerman O, Weiss EI, Mazor Y, Fuss Z. Antibacterial efficacy of a new chlorhexidine slow release device to disinfect dentinal tubules. J Endod 2003; 29(6): 416-8.
10. Chitsazi MT, shirmohammadi A, Bablayi E. The effect of herbal and chemical mouthrinses on periodontal indexes: Comparison of Persica, Matrica and Chlorhexidine. Journal of Dentistry Shiraz University of Medical Sciences 2007; 8(4): 54-60. (Persian)
11. Estrela C, Ribeiror RG, Estrela CR, Pecora JD, Sousa-Neto MD. Antimicrobial effect of 2% sodium hypochlorite and 2% chlorhexidine tested by different methods. Braz Dent J 2003; 14(1): 58-62.
12. Siqueira JFJr, Machado AG, Silverira RM, Lopes HP, de Uzeda M. Evaluation of the effectiveness of sodium hypochlorite used with three irrigation methods in the elimination of Enterococous faecalis from the root canal, in vitro. Int Endod J 1997; 30(4): 279-82.
13. Farhad AR, Havaei A, Farhad SZ, Poursina F. The bacteriologic evaluation of antibacterial effect: normal saline 5.25% and 0.5% sodium hypochlorite and calcium hydroxide. Journal of Research in Medical Sciences 2000; 5(3): 245-9. (Persian)
14. Ringel AM, Patterson SS, Newton CW, Miller CH, Mulhern JM. In vivo evaluation of chlorhexidine gluconate solution and sodium hypochlorite solution as root canal irrigants. J Endod 1982; 8(5): 200-4.
15. Yesilsoy C,Whitaker E, Cleveland D, Phillips E, Trope M. Antimicrobial and toxic effects established and potential root canal irrigants. J Endod 1995; 21(10): 513-5.
16. Prescott LM, Klein DA, Harley JP. Microbiology. 5th ed. New York: Mc Graw-Hill CO; 2002. P. 809-10. 17. Almas K. The antimicrobial effects of extracts of Azadirachta Indica (Neem) and Salvadora Persica (Arak)
chewing sticks. Indian J Dent Res 1999; 10(1): 23-6.
18. Gillespie SH, Hawkey PM. Principles and Practice of Clinical Bacteriology. 2nd ed. England; Wiley ltd: 2006. P. 77, 531.
19. Haghighati F, Jafari S, Beitollahi J. Comparison of antimicrobial effects of ten Herbal extracts with chlorhexidine on three different oral pathogens; An in vitro study. Hakim Journal 2003; 6(3): 71-6. (Persian) 20. Cohen S, Hargreaves KM. Pathways of the Pulp. 9th ed. San Francisco: Mosby Elsevier; 2005. P. 260-1.
21. Torabinejad M, Walton RE. Endodontics: Principles and Practice. 4th ed. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders Co; 2008. P. 43-4.
22. Fouad AF. Endodontic Microbiology. 2nd ed. Iowa: Wiley Blackwell; 2009. P. 251.
23. Jeansonne MJ, White RR. A comparison of 2.0% chlorhexidine gluconate and 5.25% sodium hypochlorite as antimicrobial endodontic irrigants. J Endod 1994; 20(6): 276-8.
24. Giardino L, Savoldi E, Ambu E, Rimondini R, Palezona A, Debbia EA. Antimicrobial effect of MTAD, Tetraclean, Cloreximid, and sodium hypochlorite on three common endodontic pathogens. Indian J Dent Res 2009; 20(3): 391.
25. Ballal NV, Kundabala M, Bhat KS, Acharya S, Ballal M, Kumar R, et al. Susceptibility of Candida albicans and Enterococcus faecalis to Chitosan, Chlorhexidine gluconate and their combination in vitro. Aust Endod J 2009; 35(1): 29-33.
