R E S E A R C H A R T I C L E
Open Access
Factors affecting vitamin D status in different
populations in the city of São Paulo, Brazil: the
São PAulo vitamin D Evaluation Study (SPADES)
Sergio Setsuo Maeda
1*, Gabriela Luporini Saraiva
1, Ilda Sizue Kunii
1, Lilian Fukusima Hayashi
1,
Maysa Seabra Cendoroglo
2, Luiz Roberto Ramos
3and Marise Lazaretti-Castro
1Abstract
Background:Hypovitaminosis D is a common condition among elderly individuals in temperate-climate countries, with a clear seasonal variation on 25 hydroxyvitamin D [(25(OH)D] levels, increasing after summer and decreasing after winter, but there are few data from sunny countries such as Brazil. We aimed to evaluate 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentrations and its determining factors, in individuals in the city of São Paulo belonging to different age groups and presenting different sun exposure habits.
Methods:591 people were included as follows: 177 were living in institutions (NURSING HOMES, NH, 76.2 ± 9.0 years), 243 were individuals from the community (COMMUNITY DWELLINGS, CD, 79.6 ± 5.3 years), 99 were enrolled in physical activity program designed for the elderly (PHYSICAL ACTIVITY, PA, 67.6 ± 5.4 years) and 72 were young (YOUNG, 23.9 ± 2.8 years). Ionized calcium, PTH, 25(OH)D, creatinine and albumin were evaluated. ANOVA, Mann–Whitney and Kruskal Wallis tests, Pearson Linear Correlation and Multiple Regression were used in the statistical analysis.
Results:25(OH)D mean values during winter for the different groups were 36.1 ± 21.2 nmol/L (NH), 44.1 ± 24.0 nmol/L (CD), 78.9 ± 30.9 nmol/L (PA) and 69.6 ± 26.2 nmol/L (YOUNG) (p < 0.001) while during summer they were 42.1 ± 25.9 nmol/L, 59.1 ± 29.6 nmol/L, 91.6 ± 31.7 nmol/L and 103.6 ± 29.3 nmol/L, respectively (p < 0.001). The equation which predicts PTH values based on 25(OH)D concentration is PTH = 10 + 104.24.e-(vitD-12.5)/62.36and the 25(OH)D value above which correlation with PTH is lost is 75.0 nmol/L. In a multiple regression analysis having 25 (OH)D concentration as the depending variable, the determining factors were PTH, ionized calcium and month of the year (p < 0.05).
Conclusions:Much lower 25(OH)D values were found for the older individuals when compared to younger individuals. This finding is possibly due to age and habit-related differences in sunlight exposure. The existence of seasonal effects on 25(OH)D concentration throughout the year was evident for all the groups studied, except for the nursing home group. According to our data, PTH values tend to plateau above 75 nmol/L.
Keywords:25 hydroxyvitamin D, Parathyroid Hormone, Seasonal influence, Ultraviolet radiation
* Correspondence:ssetsuo@terra.com.br
1Department of Medicine, Division of Endocrinology, Universidade Federal
de São Paulo (UNIFESP)–Escola Paulista de Medicina, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
Full list of author information is available at the end of the article
Background
Hypovitaminosis D is well documented, mainly among elderly populations in countries from the northern hemi-sphere [1-4]. For the elderly, hypovitaminosis D stimu-lates the parathyroid gland, both directly and indirectly, leading to secondary hyperparathyroidism, bringing con-sequences such as bone mass loss and an increased risk for fractures [3]. For the young population this correlation is not clear. The concentrations of 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] are influenced by several factors, such as the age, skin tone, latitude, time of the day, season, the wea-ther and many owea-thers. However, some authors evidenced that, different from what is expected, people from south-ern European countries have lower concentrations of 25 (OH)D than people from northern countries [1,5]. These data suggest that habit-related factors also influence 25 (OH)D concentrations and these have not been investi-gated in countries where sunlight is abundant, such as Brazil.
This study was named SPADES (The São PAulo Vitamin D Evaluation Study) and its main objective was to recognize the factors that contribute to determining blood 25(OH)D concentrations in four different popula-tion groups in the city of São Paulo, Brazil (23°34’S, sub-tropical weather).
Methods Subjects
The study protocol was previously approved by the UNIFESP Ethics Committee and all volunteers gave written informed consent.
The cross-sectional study SPADES aimed at analyzing data from different age groups in the population and also groups that have distinct sunlight exposure habits in the city of São Paulo. All the individual population groups reported here have already had their results pub-lished elsewhere and the objective of the present study is to evaluate all the groups together. The data were obtained in the same city and the same method was used for measuring 25(OH)D [6-10].
The first population studied was called NURSING HOMES (NH) and it was composed of individuals who live in two nursing homes in the city of São Paulo. Mostly these individuals are from low income families that have little access to health services and for this reason their health conditions were generally poor. Indi-viduals showing creatinine values above 2.0 mg/dL, hy-percalcemia, hypocalcemia and those who were confined to a bed were excluded from the study. The final sample was represented by 177 individuals, ages varying from 60 to 100 years. Ethnic distribution: 90.9% white and 9.1% black. Blood samples were drawn in April (fall, 37.3% of individuals) and July (winter, 62.7% of individuals) of 2001 [6,7].
The second population was called COMMUNITY DWELLINGS (CD) and it originated from a cohort study (EPIDOSO) developed with people from the dis-trict around UNIFESP (Universidade Federal de São Paulo), one of the 55 districts that compose the city of São Paulo. This region is predominantly composed by a Caucasian middle class population. We analyzed the data from 250 individuals, evaluated in 2001, ten years after the beginning of the study. From those, seven were excluded from the study (one for showing creatinine levels above 2.0 mg/dL and six for showing hypercalce-mia). The final population studied was composed by 243 individuals, ages varying from 61 to 97 years [6-8]. Eth-nic distribution: 94.6% white and 5.4% black. In this group, 35.0% of the individuals had their blood samples collected during summer/fall, while 65.0% had them col-lected during winter/spring.
The third population was called PHYSICAL ACTIV-ITY (PA) and was composed of 101 individuals (54 women and 47 men), enrolled in a physical activity pro-gram destined to the elderly [9]. Each volunteer had a blood sample collected in two different moments in 2002: one in June (winter) and one in December (summer). Two patients were excluded from the initial group: one for presenting primary hyperparathyroidism (PTH 163 pg/mL and ionized calcium 1.56 mM) and the other for presenting 25(OH)D level much higher than normal (280 nmol/L). The final population studied was composed of 99 people and from those, 88 had the second blood sample collected (88.9% of the initial population). Ages varied from 55 to 83 years. Ethnic distribution: 60.6% white, 19.2% Asian, 12.1% black and 8.1% native.
The fourth population was designated YOUNG and was composed of 72 individuals, age varying from 17 to 35 years. Ethnic distribution: 75% white, 19.4% Asian and 5.6% black. The blood samples were obtained be-tween August 2002 and February 2003 [10]. In this group, 51.4% of the individuals had their blood sample collected in months corresponding to summer/fall and 48.6% in months corresponding to winter/spring.
The final population of the SPADES study was com-posed of 591 individuals.
Methods
The blood samples were taken after an eight-hour fast. Ionized calcium, creatinine, albumin, 25(OH)D and in-tact parathyroid hormone (PTH) were measured. All serum samples were collected into refrigerated tubes, processed in refrigerated centrifuges, and frozen at−20°C
until measured. The ionized calcium was measured after centrifugation.
ion-electrode method (AVL 9180 Electrolyte Analyzer, Minn). PTH (parathyroid hormone) was measured by an immunofluorimetric in house method (IFMA, VR: 10– 55 pg/mL) [11]. The creatinine clearance was calculated by the Cockroft-Gault formula [12]. Reference values for these methods are presented in Table 1.
The 25(OH)D concentrations were determined by an immunoradiometric assay (Nichols Institute Diagnostics, San Juan Capristrano, CA, USA). Intra-assay coefficient of variation was 4.8%, and inter-assay coefficient of variation was 16.0% for the lowest values (mean: 35.5 nmol/L) and 3.0% for the highest control (mean: 154.0 nmol/L).
To certify that the radiation conditions were similar through the years, we compared ultraviolet radiation
during 4 consecutive years, and the UV year-pattern was repetitive (p = 0,444, unpublished data).
The exponential formula that predicts PTH values from 25(OH)D was created using the software Origin 5.0 (Microcal Inc, Northampton, Massachusetts, USA). This same program was used for generating Figure 1.
Statistical analysis
The Mann–Whitney test was used to evaluate the differ-ences between men and women, and ANOVA and Kruskal Wallis test were used to check for the difference between the groups according to their origin. The cor-relation between 25(OH)D and PTH with the other quantitative variables was evaluated through the Pearson
Table 1 Mean ± standard deviation and reference values (RV) for the variables studied and its comparison, according to the gender and group of origin
NH CD PA Young
(N = 177) (N = 243) (N = 99) (N = 72)
M = 49 W = 128 M = 75 W = 168 M = 47 W = 52 M = 32 W = 40
Age (years) 76.2 ± 9.0 79.6 ± 5.3*b 67.6 ± 5.4*Ŧa 23.9 ± 2.8*Ŧb
Male 73.8 ± 8.8 79.4 ± 4.4*ab 67.8 ± 4.9*Ŧa 23.8 ± 2.7*Ŧb
Female 77.7 ± 8.9 79.7 ± 5.6a 67.4 ± 5.9*Ŧa 23.9 ± 2.9*Ŧb
BMI (RV: 19.0-25.0 kg/m2) 26.3 ± 5.6 26.7 ± 4.3 27.2 ± 4.4a 22.4 ± 3.0*Ŧ
Male 25.2 ± 4.9 25.8 ± 3.4£a 28.1 ± 4.0£a 23.1 ± 2.3*£
Female 26.8 ± 5.9 27.2 ± 4.6£a 27.6 ± 4.7£a 21.9 ± 3.4£*Ŧ
Albumin (RV: 3.5-5.0 g/L) 3.7 ± 0.4 4.0 ± 0.3* 4.0 ± 0.2*Ŧ 4.7 ± 0.5*Ŧb
Male 3.6 ± 0.4 4.1 ± 0.2*a 4.1 ± 0.2*a 5.0 ± 0.3£Ŧ*
Female 3.7 ± 0.4 4.0 ± 0.3*a 4.0 ± 0.2*a 4.5 ± 0.4£Ŧ*
Creatinine (RV: 0.6-1.5 mg/dL) 1.04 ± 0.3 0.95 ± 0.2*a 0.98 ± 0.1 1.07 ± 0.2
Male 1.15 ± 0.2£ 1.16 ± 0.2£ 1.07 ± 0.1£a 1.20 ± 0.1£
Female 1.00 ± 0.2£ 0.85 ± 0.1£* 0.89 ± 0.1£* 0.96 ± 0.1£Ŧ
ClearCrea (RV: 70.0-110.0 mg/dL) 49.7 ± 23.2 53.8 ± 15.2 68.5 ± 19.7*Ŧa 88.5 ± 20.8*Ŧ
Male 56.6 ± 23.2£ 54.6 ± 17.0£ 70.2 ± 17.7*Ŧa 96.5 ± 13.8£*Ŧ
Female 47.1 ± 22.7£ 48.5 ± 23.3£ 66.9 ± 21.5*Ŧa 82.2 ± 23.3£*Ŧ
Ionized Calcium (RV: 1.12-1.40 mM) 1.28 ± 0.04 1.25 ± 0.05* 1.31 ± 0.04*Ŧ 1.31 ± 0.05*Ŧ
Male 1.28 ± 0.10 1.26 ± 0.10* 1.31 ± 0.03*Ŧ 1.33 ± 0.10£*Ŧ
Female 1.29 ± 0.10 1.25 ± 0.10* 1.32 ± 0.04*Ŧ 1.29 ± 0.10£*Ŧ
PTH (RV: 10.0-55.0 pg/mL)# 85.0 ± 55.8 73.8 ± 56.6ab 25.0 ± 12.3*Ŧ 26.4 ± 15.4*Ŧ
Male 85.0 ± 58.2 78.0 ± 81.7 26.1 ± 15.7*Ŧ 26.8 ± 17.8*Ŧ
Female 84.8 ± 55.1 71.8 ± 39.8* 23.6 ± 9.5*Ŧ 26.1 ± 13.2*Ŧ
25(OH)D (RV: >75.0 nmol/L)# 37.6 ± 29.9 49.5 ± 27.7*ab 78.9 ± 30.9*Ŧ 86.3 ± 34.8*Ŧ
Male 47.1 ± 20.8£ 59.4 ± 30.9£ 81.2 ± 30.1*Ŧ 94.3 ± 38.2*Ŧ
Female 33.9 ± 32.1£ 45.1 ± 25.1£* 76.7 ± 31.8*Ŧ 79.9 ± 30.9*Ŧ
M= menW= women.
£significant difference (p < 0.05) in relation to gender inside each group.
* significant difference (p < 0.05) in relation to NURSING HOMES (NH). Ŧsignificant difference (p < 0.05) in relation to COMMUNITY DWELLINGS (CD). asignificant difference (p < 0.05) in relation to YOUNG .
bsignificant difference (p < 0.05) in relation to PHYSICAL ACTIVITY (PA).
Linear Correlation and Multiple Regression. Data are reported as Mean ± SD (Standard Deviation). Differences were considered significant when p < 0.05.
Results
A total of 591 individuals were included as follows: NH, 177 individuals (128 women and 49 men, mean age 76.2 ± 9.0 years); CD, 243 individuals (168 women and 75 men, mean age 79.6 ± 5.3 years); PA, 99 individuals (52 women and 47 men, mean age 67.6 ± 5.4 years) and YOUNG, 72 individuals (40 women and 32 men, mean age 23.9 ± 2.8 years). In Tables 1, 2 and 3, only 25(OH)D measure-ments done during winter were used for the group PA. In relation to ethnicity, the sample was predominantly com-posed of whites (84.4%).
The laboratory results obtained for the group as a total and also separated by gender and subgroup of origin are described in Table 1. Men presented higher creatinine, creatinine clearance and 25(OH)D values, when com-pared to women, but the sex ratio between groups dif-fers significantly; there are more women in NH (72.3%) and CD (69.1%) groups than in the PA (52.5%) and YOUNG (55.5%) groups. We observed that people in YOUNG group had a lower BMI and higher albumin and creatinine clearance values when compared to the other groups.
Only 6.3% of the total population studied had made use of vitamin D supplements (dose varying from 200 to 400 IU a day) and these had a 25(OH)D average blood concentration of 69.1 ± 34.9 nmol/L, while the group that had not taken a vitamin D supplement showed a signifi-cantly lower blood concentration (54.8 ± 33.4 nmol/L, p = 0.018).
Using the Pearson´s linear correlation and considering only individuals who were not using vitamin D supple-ments, significant correlations were found between 25 (OH)D and age (r =−0.43, p = 0.001), PTH (r =−0.38,
p = 0.001), albumin (r = +0.32, p = 0.001), creatinine clearence (r = +0.31, p = 0.001), ionized calcium (r = +0.30, p = 0.001), month of the year (r =−0.29, p = 0.001) and
BMI (r =−0.21, p = 0.001). Creatinine did not show any
significant correlation (r = +0.04, p = 0.203). Using a model of multiple linear regression, setting the age as the pre-dictive variable and adjusting by ethnicity and gender, the following correlations were still significant: PTH
0 50 100 150 200 250
0 50 100 150 200 250 300
25OHD (nmol/L)
PT
H (
p
g
/m
L
)
r= -0.38
p=0.001
75.0
Figure 1Correlation between PTH (pg/mL) and 25OHD (nmol/L) in the sample studied.Above 75.0 nmol/L of 25OHD there is no correlation with PTH.
Table 2 Correlation between PTH (pg/mL) and 25(OH)D (nmol/L) considering different 25(OH)D concentration ranges
25(OH)D (nmol/L) n r p PTH (pg/mL)
All 572 −0.330 >0.001 62.6 ± 53.6
>25.0 460 −0.303 >0.001 58.0 ± 54.3
>37.5 373 −0.271 >0.001 51.9 ± 44.3
>50.0 292 −0.236 >0.001 47.2 ± 39.6
>62.5 205 −0.193 0.006 43.0 ± 35.6
>75.0 139 −0.137 0.114 39.4 ± 31.6
>87.5 93 −0.062 0.558 37.4 ± 26.5
(p = 0.01), ionized calcium (p = 0.048) and month of the year (p = 0.01).
Considering the PTH values, significant correlations were found with the following variables: age (r = +0.37, p = 0.001), 25(OH)D (r =−0.38, p = 0.001), albumin (r =−0.30,
p = 0.001), creatinine clearence (r =−0.29, p = 0.001),
cre-atinine (r = +0.13, p = 0.003), ionized calcium (r =−0.25,
p = 0.001) and BMI (r =−0.13, p = 0.003). Using a model
of multiple linear regression, setting the age as the predict-ive variable, 25(OH)D (p = 0.001), creatinine (p = 0.001) and ionized calcium (p = 0.011) were still significant.
The mathematical equation which predicts the PTH value, based on the 25(OH)D concentration is expressed by the formula PTH = 10 + 104.24.e-(vitD-12.5)/62.36. We also defined the concentration of 75.0 nmol/L as the cut-off value for which 25(OH)D concentrations did not correlate with PTH levels (Figure 1, Table 2). Within the groups, 91.5% from NH; 87.6% from CD; 48.5% from PA and 40.3% from YOUNG fell below this concentration cut-off.
In Table 4 reports on the 25(OH)D concentration dis-tribution (nmol/L) according to the group and season of the year. Summer and fall were grouped together, con-sidering these are very sunny. We observed that the NH and CD groups were the ones showing the lowest 25
(OH)D concentration throughout the year (36.1 ± 21.2 and 44.1 ± 24.0 nmol/L during winter/spring and 42.1 ± 25.9 and 59.1 ± 29.6 nmol/L during summer/fall, respect-ively). The group NH was the only one not to show any increase during summer/fall.
Within each age group, as age advances, progressively lower 25(OH)D and higher PTH concentrations were observed. 25OHD concentrations lower than 75.0 nmol/L were found for 85.7% of those older than 71 years, while the incidence of secondary hyperparathyroidism was 57% among those (Table 3).
Discussion
Several reports have previously shown that the preva-lence of hypovitaminosis D is high among the elderly in the United States and Europe (< 30 ng/mL), but there are few data from countries in South America, where sunlight is abundant throughout the year, such as Brazil [1-4]. The abundant sunlight would make us believe this was a problem restricted to countries of higher latitudes. However, Lips et al. and van der Wielen et al. demon-strated that countries from southern Europe show higher incidence of hypovitaminosis D when compared to northern countries [1-5]. Some recent reviews showed that the vitamin D deficiency is common in South Asia and the Middle East [13,14].
The city of São Paulo is crossed by the Tropic of Capricorn (23ºS) and presents relatively mild winters, with temperatures rarely achieving 0°C (32°F). It is a large urban center, being the largest one in South Amer-ica, with a predominant Caucasian population. It has more than 10 million inhabitants and a large concentra-tion of high-rise buildings and industries. During winter there is a significant concentration of air pollutants which can absorb solar UVB radiation and, conse-quently, reducing vitamin D formation [15]. Our elderly population has been increased similar to the pattern of developed countries. Between 1980 and 2003, there was an increment of 8.7 years in the life expectancy at birth, which nowadays is 71.3 years in Brazil.
Age was the variable that most significantly correlated with 25(OH)D plasma concentrations, as was demonstrated Table 3 25(OH)D (nmol/L) and PTH (pg/mL) concentrations according to the different age groups (vitamin D users were excluded), percentage of individuals with secondary hyperparathyroidism (SHP) within each group and correlation between PTH and 25(OH)D evaluated by Pearson’s correlation
Age Group (years) n 25(OH)D (nmol/L) < 75.0 nmol/L (%) PTH (pg/mL) SHP (%) r p
17–35 72 86.3 ± 34.9 40.3 26.4 ± 15.4 6.9 −0.018 0.876
55–60 13 62.9 ± 35.7 64.2 50.8 ± 44.5 28.5 −0.185 0.546
61–70 97 60.9 ± 34.6 50.0 48.7 ± 46.3 25.0 −0.417 < 0.001
71–80 218 49.5 ± 28.4 84.8 68.3 ± 44.9 46.0 −0.309 < 0.001
81–90 132 43.8 ± 29.0 78.4 80.0 ± 71.2 52.5 −0.138 0.139
91–100 13 30.6 ± 17.2 100.0 123.4 ± 67.7 58.9 −0.398 0.225
Table 4 Mean ± standard deviation referring to the comparisons of 25(OH)D according to the origin of the sample and season of the year
Season of the year
Winter/Spring Summer/Fall
Origin n 25(OH)D (nmol/L) n 25(OH)D (nmol/L)
NH 111 36.1 ± 21.2 66 42.1 ± 25.9
CD 158 44.1 ± 24.0 85 59.1 ± 29.6t
PA£ 99 78.9 ± 30.9a b 88 91.6 ± 31.7ta b
Young 35 69.3 ± 25.6a b 37 103.6 ± 29.3ta b
£paired analysis.
tsignificant difference (p < 0.01) within each origin, considering the season of
the year.
asignificant difference (p < 0.05) within each season of the year in relation
to NURSING.
bsignificant difference (p < 0.05) within each season of the year in relation
by a multiple regression model applied. Younger individuals had higher 25(OH)D concentrations (Table 3). For this rea-son, in the multiple regression vitamin D status analysis, we chose to use age as the predictive variable, adjusted by gen-der and ethnicity. Among the other parameters evaluated in the model, ionized calcium, PTH and month of the year, which are other variables that present known correlation with 25(OH)D, maintained significance [16,17].
It is known that the 25(OH)D plasma concentrations follow a seasonal variation, demonstrated in places of more temperate weather [16,18,19]. Our data clearly demonstrate the existence of a seasonal pattern for 25 (OH)D concentrations throughout the year that follows the ultraviolet radiation distribution and does not change over time. This phenomenon was evident in all the groups, except for the NH one (Table 4). In this group, although the group age was similar to the one in CD, the mean of the values in summer was not higher than that obtained in winter. This suggests that sunlight exposure was not enough for this group. On the other hand, it was observed that the subjects from CD reached values 34% higher in the summer, almost reaching the in-crement rate observed for young people, which was 47%.
Gannagé-Yared et al. demonstrated that there are in-fluences from life habits on 25(OH)D concentration (in this study the use of veil was evaluated) [20]. Other authors demonstrated that the seasonal variation also exerts influences on bone remodeling markers, bone mass and fractures [19,21]. In the same way, the individ-uals from PA group demonstrated a well defined sea-sonal variation when prospectively evaluated, except for the ones older than 71 years old who presented a pattern similar to that of the NH and CD groups [9]. An inter-esting fact is that the group PA had some sunlight exposure during their physical activities at least twice a week for 1 h (in this group the use of sunscreen was evaluated and no significant variation was found be-tween users and non-users). These data suggest that if more frequently exposed to sunlight, the individuals younger than 70 years old can achieve an adequate vita-min D status [22-24]. This is probably one of the advan-tages of living in lower latitudes, where sunlight is more abundant.
In our study, it was possible to observe the correlation that exists between PTH and 25(OH)D, which was expressed through an exponential equation (Figure 1), the same way it has been described [20,25,26]. The con-centration from which the correlation between 25(OH)D and PTH was lost was > 75.0 nmol/L (Table 2), a value similar to previous reports [27]. It means that above this concentration, sufficiency of vitamin D does not inter-fere with PTH secretion. We observed that the lower concentrations of 25(OH)D are associated with second-ary hyperparathyroidism and that was more frequent in
NH and CD (Tables 1, 4 and 3). Among the young indi-viduals evaluated in this study, we found a higher 25(OH) D mean. However, for a good proportion of the samples the values were below the sufficiency limit, but besides that, no correlation with PTH was observed (r =−0.018,
p = 0.876). Among young individuals PTH does not seem to be a good parameter to indirectly evaluate vita-min D status [10].
For the multiple regression analysis, setting PTH level as the depending variable and age as the adjusted predict-ive variable, the evaluated parameters that maintained the significance in the model were 25(OH)D, creatinine and ionized calcium, variables which are known to exert influ-ence on PTH levels [28,29]. Table 3 suggested that PTH levels increased with age, possibly due to several factors acting together, such as vitamin D insufficiency/deficiency, renal function decrease (1α-hydroxylation) and the
influ-ence of prescription drugs on vitamin D metabolism [29,30]. Another important factor is the decreased inges-tion and intestinal absorpinges-tion of calcium [31-33].
The primary objective of hypovitaminosis D correction is promoting the maximum intestinal calcium absorption, re-ducing the frequency of falls and correcting the secondary hyperparathyroidism [27]. According to Bischoff-Ferrari
et al., the supplementation with at least 700 IU of vitamin
D/d was enough to reduce the risk of vertebral and vertebral fractures [34]. Besides that, there are other non-skeletal effects which have been attributed to vitamin D status, such as the prevention of cancer and autoimmune diseases [4]. In spite of all this knowledge, the number of individuals who received vitamin D supplements was very low. When the mean 25(OH)D concentration was evalu-ated for this group, we observed that although it was higher than the mean value for individuals who did not receive supplementation, it was still below the ideal limit (73% of these individuals presented concentrations < 75.0 nmol/L) [3,4]. Therefore the vitamin D doses these individuals re-ceived (200–400 IU/d) were not enough for the prevention of hypovitaminosis D. The Endocrine Practice Guidelines recommends adults need 1,500-2,000 IU vitamin D/d to prevent vitamin D deficiency [35].
These results point out to the need for governmental public health action, which could implement measures such as vitamin D supplement distribution to nursing homes, food supplementation and medical education about the high prevalence of this condition among the elderly, considering the associated risk for fractures.
Due to the high degree of miscegenation of the Brazilian population, it is always difficult to classify them ethnically. Nevertheless, most of the evaluated individuals were white (84.4%). According to the 2000 Brazilian Demographic Census for the city of São Paulo, the white population is the majority (67.0% of population, data from IBGE-Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística). However, our data cannot be extrapolated to all different regions of the country, because, besides different latitudes and wea-ther conditions, the population presents different genetic backgrounds and habits, which are important factors for the serum vitamin D status.
In addition, several other factors potentially affect vita-min D status such as genetic factors, adiposity, dietary intake, intestinal malabsorption and impaired hydroxyl-ation in the liver and kidneys.
Conclusions
We found very low 25(OH)D concentrations for the elderly when compared to younger people. This finding is possibly due to age and habit-related sunlight exposure differences. The existence of a seasonal variation over 25(OH)D con-centrations is evident, as well as the influence of age is. Secondary hyperparathyroidism was frequent among the older individuals and was associated with 25(OH)D levels, creatinine and ionized calcium. According to our data, PTH values tend to plateau above 75.0 nmol/L. We found that 73.3% of the sample population studied is below this value.
Abbreviations
UNIFESP:Universidade Federal de São Paulo (Federal University of São Paulo); SPADES: São PAulo Vitamin D Evaluation Study; 25(OH)D: 25 hidroxyvitamin D; NH: Nursing homes; CD: Community dwellings; PA: Physical activity; PTH: Parathyroid hormone; BMI: Body mass index; UVB: Ultraviolet radiation B; IBGE: Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística (Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics).
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Authors’contributions
SSM - main author. GLS–provided the data of NH and CD groups,
participated in its design. ISK - carried out the immunoassays. LFH - carried out the immunoassays. MSC - provided the data of NH and CD groups, participated in its design. LRR - provided the data of NH and CD groups, participated in its design. MLC–conceived of the study, and participated in
its design and coordination and helped to draft the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Authors’information
SSM–M.D., Ph.D. at the UNIFESP (Bone Metabolism section), and Professor
at the Santa Casa de São Paulo Medical School
MLC–M.D., Ph.D. and Professor at the UNIFESP (Bone Metabolism section)
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by FAPESP (Fundação de amparo à pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo–São Paulo Research Funding Foundation)–grant
number 03/13194-6.
Author details
1Department of Medicine, Division of Endocrinology, Universidade Federal
de São Paulo (UNIFESP)–Escola Paulista de Medicina, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.2Department of Medicine, Geriatrics, UNIFESP, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.3Department of Preventive Medicine, UNIFESP, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Received: 5 October 2012 Accepted: 21 February 2013 Published: 29 April 2013
References
1. Van der Wielen RPJ, Lowik MRH, van der Berg H, de Groot LCPGM, Haller J, Moreiras O, van Staveren WA:Serum vitamin D concentration among elderly people in Europe.Lancet1995,346:207–10.
2. McKenna MJ:Differences in vitamin D status between countries in young adults and the elderly.Am J Med1992,93:69–77.
3. Lips P:Vitamin deficiency and secondary hyperparathyroidism in the elderly: consequences for bone loss and fractures and therapeutic implications.Endoc Rev2001,22:477–501.
4. Holick MF:Vitamin D deficiency.N Engl J Med2007,357:266–281.
5. Lips P, Duong T, Oleksik A, Black D, Cummings S, Cox D, Nickelsen T:A global study of vitamin D status and parathyroid function in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis: baseline data from the multiple outcomes of raloxifene evaluation clinical trial.J Clin Endocrinol Metab2001,86:1212–1221.
6. Saraiva GL, Cendoroglo MS, Ramos LR, Araújo LM, Vieira JGH, Kunii IS, Hayashi LF, de Paula CM, Lazaretti Castro M:Influence of ultraviolet radiation on the production of 25 hydroxyvitamin D in the elderly population in the city of São Paulo (23°34’S), Brazil.Osteoporos Int2005, 16(12):1649–1654.
7. Saraiva GL, Cendoroglo MS, Ramos LR, Araújo LM, Vieira JGH, Maeda SS, Borba VZC, Kunii IS, Hayashi LF, Lazaretti Castro M:Prevalência da deficiência, insuficiência de vitamina D e hiperparatireoidismo secundário em idosos institucionalizados e moradores da cidade de São Paulo, Brasil.Arq Bras Endocrinol Metab2007,51(3):437–442.
8. Ramos LR, Toniolo Neto J, Cendoroglo MS, Garcia JT, Najas M, Perracini M, Paola C, Santos F, Bilton TL, Ebel S, Macedo MBM, Almada Filho CM, Nasri F, Miranda RD, Gonçalves M, Santos A, Fraieta R, Vivacqua I, Alves M, Tudisco E:Two-year follow-up study of elderly residents in São Paulo, Brazil: methodology and preliminary results.J Public Health1998,32:397–407.
9. Maeda SS, Kunii IS, Hayashi LF, Lazaretti-Castro M:Increases in summer serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25OHD) concentrations in elderly subjects in São Paulo, Brazil vary with age, gender and ethnicity.BMC Endocrine Disord2010,10:12.
10. Maeda SS, Kunii IS, Hayashi LF, Lazaretti-Castro M:The effect of the sun exposure on 25 hydroxyvitamin D concentrations in young health subjects living in the city of São Paulo, Brazil.Braz J Med Biol Res2007, 40(12):1653–1659.
11. Vieira JGH, Nishida SK, Kasamatsu TS, Amarante EC, Kunii IS:Development and clinical application of an immunofluorimetric assay for intact parathyroid hormone.Braz J Med Biol Res1994,27:2379–2382.
12. Cockroft D, Gault H:Prediction of creatinine clearence from serum creatinine.Nephron1976,16:31–41.
13. Mithal A, Wahl DA, Bonjour JP, Burckhardt P, Dawson-Hughes B, Eisman JA, El-Hajj Fuleihan G, Josse RG, Lips P, Morales-Torres J, IOF Committee of Scientific Advisors (CSA) Nutrition Working Group:Global vitamin D status and determinants of hypovitaminosis D.Osteoporos Int2009,20(11):1807–20.
14. Wahl DA, Cooper C, Ebeling PR, Eggersdorfer M, Hilger J, Hoffmann K, Josse R, Kanis JA, Mithal A, Pierroz DD, Stenmark J, Stöcklin E, Dawson-Hughes B: A global representation of vitamin D status in healthy populations.Arch Osteoporos.2012,7(1–2):155–72.
15. Henir-Manicourt D, Devogalaer JP:Urban troposferic ozone increases the prevalence of vitamin D deficiency among Belgian postmenopausal women with outodoor activities during summer.J Clin Endocrinol Metab
2008,93(10):3893–3899.
16. Sherman SS, Hollis BW, Tobin JD:Vitamin D status and related parameters in a healthy population: the effects of age, sex and season.J Clin Endocrinol Metab1990,71:405–413.
18. Stryd RP, Gilbertson TJ, Brunden MN:A seasonal variation study of 25-hydroxyvitamin D3serum levels in normal humans.J Clin Endocrinol
Metab1979,48:771–5.
19. Pasco JA, Henry MJ, Kotowicz MA, Sanders KM, Seeman E, Pasco JR, Schneider HG, Nicholson GC:Seasonal periodicity of serum vitamin D and parathyroid hormone, bone resorption, and fractures: the Geelong osteoporosis study.J Bone Miner Res2004,19(5):752–758.
20. Gannagé-Yared MH, Chemali R, Yaacoub N, Halaby G:Hypovitaminosis D in a sunny country: relation to lifestyle and bone markers.J Bone Miner Res
2000,15(9):1856–62.
21. Lips P, Hackeng WHL, Jongen MJM, Ginkel van FC, Netelenbos JC:Seasonal variation in serum concentrations of parathyroid hormone in elderly people.J Clin Endoc Metab1983,57:204–6.
22. Tangpricha V, Pearce EN, Chen TC, Holick MF:Vitamin D insufficiency among free-living healthy young adults.Am J Med2002,112 (suppl 8):659–662.
23. MacLaughlin J, Holick MF:Aging decreases the capacity of human skin to produce vitamin D3.J Clin Invest1985,76:1536–8.
24. Vieth R, Ladak Y, Walfish PG:Age-related changes in the 25-hydroxyvitamin D versus parathyroid hormone relationship suggest a different reason why older adults require more Vitamin D.J Clin Endocrinol Metab2003,88(1):185–191.
25. Souberbielle JC, Cormier C, Kindermans C, Gao P, Cantor T, Forette F, Baulieu EE:Vitamin D status and redefining serum parathyroid hormone reference range in the elderly.J Clin Endocrinol Metab2001,86:3086–3090.
26. Chapuy MC, Preziosi P, Maamer M, Arnaud S, Galan P, Hercberg S, Meunier PJ:Prevalence of Vitamin D insufficiency in an adult normal population.
Osteoporos Int1997,7:439–443.
27. Dawson-Hughes B, Heaney RP, Holick MF, Lips P, Meunier PJ, Vieth R: Estimates of optimal vitamin D status.Osteoporos Int2005,16:713–716.
28. Utiger R:The need for more Vitamin D.N Engl J Med1998,338(12):828–9.
29. Gloth FM III, Tobin JD:Vitamin D deficiency in older people.JAGS1995, 43:822–8.
30. Freaney R, McBrinn Y, McKenna MJ:Secondary hyperparathyroidism in elderly people: combined effect of renal insufficiency and vitamin D deficiency.Am J Clin Nutr1993,58:187–191.
31. Need AG, Horowitz M, Morris HA, Nordin BC:Vitamin D status: effects on parathyroid hormone and 1, 25-dihydroxyvitamin D in postmenopausal women.Am J Clin Nutr2000,71(6):1577–81.
32. Adami S, Viapiana O, Gatti D, Idolazzi L, Rossini M:Relationship between serum parathyroid hormone, vitamin D sufficiency, age, and calcium intake.Bone2008,42(2):267–70.
33. Steingrimsdottir L, Gunnarsson O, Indridason OS, Franzson L, Sigurdsson G: Relationship between serum parathyroid hormone levels, vitamin D sufficiency, and calcium intake.JAMA2005,294(18):2336–41.
34. Bischoff-Ferrari H:Vitamin D: what is an adequate vitamin D level and how much supplementation is necessary?Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol
2009,26(6):789–95.
35. Holick MF, Binkley NC, Bischoff-Ferrari HA, Gordon CM, Hanley DA, Heaney RP, Murad MH, Weaver, Endocrine Society:Evaluation, treatment, and prevention of vitamin D deficiency: an endocrine society clinical practice guideline.JCEM2011,96(7):1911–30.
doi:10.1186/1472-6823-13-14
Cite this article as:Maedaet al.:Factors affecting vitamin D status in different populations in the city of São Paulo, Brazil: the São PAulo vitamin D Evaluation Study (SPADES).BMC Endocrine Disorders201313:14.
Submit your next manuscript to BioMed Central and take full advantage of:
• Convenient online submission
• Thorough peer review
• No space constraints or color figure charges
• Immediate publication on acceptance
• Inclusion in PubMed, CAS, Scopus and Google Scholar
• Research which is freely available for redistribution
