• Nenhum resultado encontrado

Profiling of olfactory receptor gene expression in whole human olfactory mucosa.

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2017

Share "Profiling of olfactory receptor gene expression in whole human olfactory mucosa."

Copied!
14
0
0

Texto

Loading

Imagem

Figure 1. Expression profiling of candidate reference genes in whole human olfactory mucosa
Figure 6 shows OR genes ranked in function of their expression level, from the highest to lowest
Figure 4. Expression frequency of OR genes in the population of 26 individuals. The bar chart represents the number of expressed OR genes (.5 copies/20 ng RNA) as a function of the number of expressing individuals, e.g
Table 2. RNA copies number average and number of individuals that express reported deorphanized olfactory receptors.

Referências

Documentos relacionados

Coordinate transcription of variant surface glycoprotein genes and an expression site associated gene family in Trypanosoma brucei. Cloning and transcription analysis of a variant

Sequence of speci fi c primers designed for the quantitative detection of genes involved in the synthesis of esterase and endogenous control gene 18S ribosomal RNA for

We studied the differential expression of Odorant-Binding Proteins (OBPs) gene family, which participate in initial steps of the olfactory signal transduction cascade, in two

Based on previous studies that claimed the influence of unknown elements in the control and regulation of mecA gene, the ability of bla genes to control mecA expression

This study evaluated the expression of three housekeeping genes (beta-actin, cyclophilin A, and ubiquitin C) in different areas of the central nervous system in rats (olfactory bulb,

C ; Representative in-cell western assay and summary data of the TRPC3 expression (normalized to CD14 expression used as an internal reference) in monocytes from normotensive

Differential expression of genes in the CA1 region of KA-treated rats compared to control rats: genes associated with neuronal damage, calcium-binding, gliosis and inflammation..

This analysis was limited to the sting gland comparison between nurses and foragers, and the sting gland versus digestive tract comparisons for both life history phases,