-
...
-...
--
......
...
...
...
--
-...
SEMINÂRIO DE PESQUISA econセmica@ 11
Hャセ@ e Rセ@ partes) 1986
SUMÂRIO
- Análise de longo prazo com um modelo multi-setorial dinâmico da economia brasileira.
OCTÂVIO TOURINHO.
- Macroeconomia com racionamento: um modelo simplificado. RUBENS PENHA CYSNE.
- O Estado do Rio de Janeiro, e a questão do setor terciário. RALPH MIGUEL ZERKOWSKI.
- Heterogeneity, aggregation, and market wage functioBs: an empiri-cal model of self-selection in the labor market.
---
..
..
-
..
..
-
..
..
..
..
-
--
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
-
--..
-..
..
-ESCOLA DE
pセsMgraduacᅢo@EM ECONOMIA
DO INSTITUTO BRASILEIRO DE ECONOMIA
DA FUNDACÃO GETOLIO VARGAS
C I R C U L A R N9 36/86
Assunto: Seminários de Pesquisa
Econômica
11(la.parte)
Convidamos V.Sas. a participar do Scminário/EPGE
a ser realizado na oróxima 5a. feira:
Data:
07 de agosto de 1986
Horário: 15:30h
セウ@17:30h
Local:
Auditório Eugênio Gudin - EPGE/FGV
Praia de Botafogo 190 - 109 andar
TEMA:
"ANALISE DE LONGO PRAZO COM UM MODELO MULTI-SETORIAL
DINÂMICO DA ECONOMIA BRASILEIRA"
Dr. Octávio Tourinho - IPEA
Rio de Janeiro, 31 de julho de 1986.
HQ、GエセGMM
セ・ケ@ cッセ、・@
Oliveira
--
-...
...
...
-
...
...
...
--
-
-
-
-..
--...
-...
-TEXTOS PARA DISCUSSAO INTERNA
N9
86
"0 ptimal Foreign BorrO\ving in
a Multisector Dynamic
Equi1i-brium Model: A Case
Study
for Brazil
ll•
Octãvio A. F. Tourinho
Janeiro de 1986
--
-
---
--
--
---
..
-.-
.,
-.,
.,
-",
-Tiragem: 100 exemplares
Trabalho elaborado em:
Agosto de 1985
Instituto de Pesquisas do IPEA
I ns tituto de Planejamento Econômico e Social
Avenida Presidente Antonio Carlos, 51
- 139/179andar
2Ú.020
Rio de Janeiro
RJ
Este trabalho
e
da inteira e exclusiva responsabilidade de seu autor. As opl
niões nele emitidas não exprimem, n2cessariamente, o ronto de vista da
--
-..
-.,
--
..-..
-.,
-
.,
-. "
--
..-..
-
..
-.,
..
-
--." ."-..
-.{
OptiRal Foreign Borrowing in a
Xultisector dケョセセゥ」@ eアオゥャゥ「イゥオセ@ r.oàel:
A
Casa Sludy for Brazil1
by
Oclavio A. F. Tourinho2
Instituto de PlaneJamento e」ッョッセゥ」ッ@ e Social - Brazil
Paper prepared for the ORSA/TIMS National Meeting
held at Los Angeles, April 14-16,1986
1 This vork was done whila the author was a Visiting U」ィッャセイ@ at the Center for
Energy Policy Reseorch at the HIT Energy lセ「ッイッエッイケ@ undDr UNESCO/FINEP
fellowship BRA/82/4. FinanciaI support of UNESCO, FINEP ond I?EA is
grotefully ocknowledged. A previous version oi this 8SS0y oppeorod, as
Worxing Papar XセMPPYセ_@ of the MIT Energy Louorotory (June 1985).
2 セィゥャ・@ retaining セッャ。@ accountability for the research ond the ヲッイセ@ in which
it is prosentad. the Quthor wishes to thonk Charlo. R. Blitzer for help in the
セッ、・ャ@ specificotion ond suggestions on the data hondling procedures, Richard
Eckaus, Alan r.anne ond Joaquim Tolado for 」ッセセ・ョエウ@ on a previous droft, ond
Alex Meeraus and Alan Gelb for セqォゥョァ@ the セッ、・ャゥョァ@ aystea oí the Uorld Bank
availeble for this research.
...
---
-
-
--•
--
--
..
--
--
..
..
..
..
-..
..
..
-セ@
ABSTRACT
Th1ü paper Vィッセウ@ how a 、ケョセョゥ」@ セオャエゥU・」エッイ@ ・アオQQゥ「イゥオセ@ セッ、・ャ@ can be
fornuloted to be セ「ャ・@ to ッョセャケコg@ the ッーエゥセセQ@ borrowing policy of a deve10ping
country. It olso describes how a non-linear ーイッァイ。セセゥョァ@ セッ、・ャ@ wilh lha
prapased {e atures was constructed for Braz!1, and d1scueses the ッーエゥセ。ャ@
solulion of a base cc se scenario for the ・」ッョッセケ@ in the next 20 years. Tha
sensitivity ona1ysis ・イNHーィセウゥコ」ウ@ the rasponse of the セッ、・ャ@ to different
interest rotos on foreign borrowing. alternativa export ・クーセョウゥッョ@ and ゥセーッイエウ@
requ!ienents acenarias, and different hypothesis with reapect ta future petroleun priccs and dOMestic petrolcum production. The "ain conclusion ia
that tha ッーエゥセ。ャ@ 10ng run borrowing policy for Brazi1 is quite sensitive to
tha expected fulu4e interest イセエ・ウN@ and múy be different from ウッセ・@ セケッーゥ」@
strategies which ora current1y being suggested to ィセョ、ャ・@ tha developing
countries' foreign dobt ーイッ「ャ・セウN@ The oLher ゥセーッイエ。ョエ@ conclusion 1s that in
tha 18SS íavorable scenarios - protectionist foroign ・ョカゥイッョセ・ョエ@ or higher
ー・エイッャ・オセ@ pricos - it is not ッーエゥセ。ャ@ to postpona the rQquired 、ッセ・ウエゥ」@
odJustnentú by incroasod foreign borrowing. Tha usefulness of tha model is not restricted to this Get of óimulations, sinca it con ba readily adapted to
oddress reloted issues such as foroign trode, ゥョカ・Fエセ・ョエ@ ond indirect taxotion
policies.
-
--
-...
-
--
-
-
-1-1 セ@ ItlTRODUCTIOX
In tha waxe of the recent internetionol financieI crisis. the need was
falt to address severa I interconnectsd questions of long-range ョ。」イッ・」ッョッセゥ」@
planning in Brazil. They are セ。ゥョiケ@ related to ァッカ・イョセ・ョエ@ policy with respect
to the foreign dobt. the trado balanca. cnd tha interscctoral allocation of
investnent • Tha choice between high and low foreign indebtedness wi11 ィセカ・@
to ba セ。、・@ in a context whara borrowing is costly and con セョャケ@ bo avoided by
generating larga trade surp1uses which constrain the growth of 、ッセ・ウエゥ」@
. 」ッョウオセーエゥッョN@ Efforts deGigned to generate theso surplus9s through reduced
i.ports and increased exports will affect the size and sectoral cornposition of
output. require shifts in tha allocation of capital and labor in tha ・」ッョッセケN@
and 1ead to 。、jオUエセ・ョエウ@ in tha ゥョカ・ウエセ・ョエ@ patterns.
Thes9 iesues con be taken into account in an E:!con01\y-wide dyna .. ic
ッーエゥセゥコ。エゥッョ@ ᄋセッ、・ャN@ which con be úpecified to be abla to gカ。ャセ。エ・@ tha
sovings-」ッョウオセーエゥッョ@ trcdeoff. and incll1do the restrictions in tho forEign accounts and
in tha factor availcbilities. Tha activity leveIs and capital stock in each
sector. as we11 as the trade balance and net borrowing イ・アオゥイセセ・ョエウ@ can be
」セャオャ。エ・、@ endogenously to セVクゥョゥコ。@ ウッセ。@ specified uti1ity function. which
insures thal lhe solution of the セッ、・ャ@ has the desirable efficiancy
propertias.
Planning セッ、・ャウ@ with ウゥセゥャ。イ@ obJectives ィセカ・@ bocn specifled and
ゥセーャ・セッョエ・、@ for a nu .. bor of countria5. as 5urvayed by Taylor (1975). and セッイ。@
rocently by Dervis. de Melo ond Robinson (1982). Tha aodo1 described in this
pap3r i5 5ir.ilar ir. úow9 respect5 to tha one built by Blitzor and Eckaus
[1983) for Xexico. bul ッセーィ。ウゥR・ウ@ tho 。ウーセ」エウ@ that se6=ed nost rolevant for
--
--
---
---
..
-
-2-the analysis of -2-the Orazilion éituation1 • The innovotions of th8 セッ、・ャ@
propoGsd here are a rather deta1led イ・ーイ・ウセョエ。エゥッョ@ oi the ío:eign debt
、ケョセセゥ」ウL@ tha lib0ral UG8 of non-linear イッャ。エゥッョセィゥーウ@ in tha utility funclion
cnd in the interesl イセエq@ calculations, Dnd セ@ novQI ウセセ」ゥAゥ」qエゥッョ@ of the
エ・イセゥョ。ャ@ utility tern; 011 in th8 qU8St of attoining セッイ。@ イ・。ャゥgセ@ in the
Qョエ・イエセセセッイ。ャ@ choic8 espects of the ーイッ「ャ」セN@
Several ・」ッョッセケMセゥ、q@ Pアオゥャゥ「イゥオセ@ nodels ィセカ・@ b2cn built far Br&zil 1n
lhe ーセセエN@ but ョ。ョセ@ ウエイ・セF・、@ the ヲッイ・ゥセョ@ 、セ「エ@ ーイッ「ャqセ@ and thQ ャョャイエqセーッイ。ャ@
chaice iCGUGS ッウウ」ゥセエ・、@ uith it. LyGy セョ、@ Taylor [1930) used a jッィ。ョウッョMエケセ・@
podeI to analyza inco=e distribution issucs in the GWPセL@ with a イセ、ゥオセMイオョ@
perspectivo. Th3ir セッ、SQ@ ゥョ」ッイーッセセエXウ@ セ@ dotailcd ゥョーセエMッオエーオエ@ イgーイgウッョエセエゥッョ@
Df thG productivQ sector, but does not includa any ■ッイセ。ャ@ utility
セックゥセゥコ。エゥッョN@ セッ、ゥ「ョッ@ [1983J linked a procGss イ」ーイセセセョエqエゥッョ@ of the onergy
systen with セ@ 、・エセゥA・、@ 」」ッョッセ・エイゥ」@ セッ、・ャ@ of the rest of the econopy, in a
rtodel \-ihero the j-,,:a-);<:?t equilibriuM fOl- onurs-y uoods i6 found by r,õxil."lizing
」ッョウオセ・イウG@ plus ーイセ、オセ」イウG@ 5urplua. tィセエ@ セッ、qャ@ i9 eolv2d ヲッイキセイ、@ in tiPG,
without d}'II<;rnic ッーエゥdゥコセGNZNゥ」ᄋョL@ und dOGo nat inc.:lude o 、ゥ」・ウウイHャァセエ」」N@
イセセイqウセョエセエゥッョ@ oi tho ゥョエ・イウ・」エッイセャ@ flows, os tha ono hore. McCarthy (1983)
II0s built a non-optirizing セッセッャ@ for identity-hacDd セ」、ゥオ。Mイオョ@ policy
・セ。ャオ。エゥッョ@ which inc!udes the inlersectoral flows, セョ、@ also Xエエcセーエウ@ to
セ」」ッオョエ@ for alI the ヲゥョ。ョ」ゥセャ@ flovs ond budgGt イ・アオゥイ・セ・ョエウ@ of the several
actora oí the ・」ッョッセケN@
1 Tho nain 、ゥヲヲ・イセョ」セウ@ are a ;;ore セgエ。ゥjセセ@ イセーイッU・ョエ。エゥョ@ of tha borrowing
coste" i.!nd U,e ll<,.e of a •. '::H'8 õ!ltit"ioc:torl' ヲHNZZイNオャセエゥッョ@ oi the エeMイイLゥョセャ@
cünditiC'lls. In .Jdditicr" lhe r.oa!"'l prcsl=nt·,:d hQ-re カセウ@ solved vith '"
non-ャゥョdセイ@ イイPSイセセセゥョァ@ gャウッイゥエィセ@ カィゥセィ@ is apt to provida jセッイッ@ ーイッ」ゥセg@ r00ults エィセョ@
tho lir."'.:lr progranr.ing [}ーーイッセZゥZZセャゥPョ@ u:;c.:d in lhe r.uxico ilodcl.
-
---
-
--
-.,
-
-
-3-This papar also 、・セッョウエイ。エ・ウ@ that it i5 now possible to aasily solve
ョオセ・イゥ」。ャャケ@ ウッセ・@ of the ウゥセーャ・イ@ discreta エゥセ・@ non-linear neoclassical ッーエゥセ。ャ@
control problens that arise in aodela of ・」ッョッセゥ」@ growth. Thanxs to MINOS, a
program developed by Kurtagh and Saunder5 [19833, optimization packages are
now capable of handling a sizeable ョオセ「・イ@ of non-linear relationships, both in
the obJective function and in the restrictions (the latter at a sOlle .... hat
highGr cost), liberating tho ・セーゥイゥ」。ャ@ nodel builder from the straight-Jacxet
of linear programming or the purely Gtatic ・アオゥャゥ「イゥオセ@ modcls.
The plan of the paper is 88 follo .... s. The next section presents the
model formulation, addressing ウッセ・@ of the possible extensions. Section 3
describes very briefly ウッセ・@ aspects of the ゥセーャ・ ̄・ョエ。エゥッョL@ while section 4
presen.ts the "base case" solution. Section 5 contains the Gcnsitivity
analysis, with the discussion of the Rain issuea the セッ、・ャ@ セ。ウ@ セ・。ョエ@ to
address. Tha conclusion is in section 6.
2. MODEL FORMULATION
iョエ・イエ・セpqイ。ャ@ choice ーイッ「QXセウ@ con be treated consistently in the dynanic
gen8ral equilibrium ヲイ。セッキッイォ@ of ッーエゥセ。ャ@ growth セッ、・ャウN@ These con be extended
by including foreign debt as another ウエセエ」@ variabla, allowing the analysis of
the Joint 、・エ・イセゥョ。エゥッョ@ of the エゥセ。@ poths of savings, 」ッョウオセーエゥッョ@ and
borrowing that イN。クゥセゥコ・@ the 、ゥウ」ッオョエセ、@ value of the strean of utility iroa
futura con6umption. Two approoches can ba usad to onalyza ・」ッョッセゥ・V@ セッ、・ャャ・、@
in thi8 way. Ooe, takeo by Blanchard [1983], 1s to work in continuou5 エゥセ・@
and ・セーャッケ@ ッーエゥセ。ャ@ control セ・エィッ、ウ@ to derive onalyticolly the systeQ oí
differential equotions to be satisfied by the optinal poths. The other, which
ia pursued hera, i6 to solve ョオセ・イゥ」。ャャケ@ a 、ゥウ」イ・エ。Mエャセ・@ 。ーーイックャセ。エゥッョ@ to the
-
-..
--
-
-
-<1-original セ。クゥセゥコ。エゥッョ@ problem. Tha trod00ffs ore cloor: tha first ollows セ@
セッイ・@ 」ケウエ」dセエゥ」@ explorotion of the underlying propertia$ of the ウケウエ・セL@ while
tha s0cond ーッイセゥエV@ the use of a nora dutoilcd セオャエゥeッ」エッイッャ@ ropresantation of
the ectual ・」ッョッセケN@ tィセ@ enalytical approach does not render ョオセ・イゥ」。ャ@
optinizntion useless, b2COUSO it tu.ns out thot the paths of the voriobles
will in genernl セ・ー」ョ、@ very セオ」ィ@ on the initial conditicns of the dynanic
systGn, whilo on tha othGr ィセョ、N@ tho onclytiçal Golution i6 indispensable as a
benchi'Ç.rk \Ihen ir:plc:'8nting éln 」セーゥイゥ」NZャセN@ l-odel. In chort, the two セ_ーイoLZQ」ィ・U@
are highly 」ッセーャgセセョエセイケN@
The ¢ゥウ」イ・エセMエゥ■N・@ セオャエゥウァ」エッイッャ@ nodel specifiod below chooses カ。イゥ。「ャ」セ@
in ench period such セS@ L0ctoral production. ウセ」エッイ。ャ@ ゥョカ」ウエセ・ョエN@ sectoral
iGports and cxports, foreign 「ッイセッ|IゥョァL@ Gnd 」ッョウオセーエゥッョ@ leveI ônd 」ッセーッウゥエゥッョL@
SUbJ8Ct to カセイゥッオウ@ 」ッョウエイセゥョエgN@ Thcse ar8 Lh8 ョセエ・セゥセャ@ balcnçes. the foreign
exchcrlge balence, the labor supply 」ッョウエイセゥョエN@ セョ、@ the dynanic oquations for
debt and 」セーゥエ。ャ@ 」」」オセオャッエゥッョRN@
The ヲッイr。ャゥセセエゥッョ@ of the セセゥョ@ 」ウーセ」エウ@ of エィゥセ@ ーイッYイセrrゥョァ@ ーイッ「ャ・セ@ i5 in
the r:<:'xt !:.1Jb-sectiorl2.. h,n.:.?re thc Gョッエセエゥッョ@ is as follo\Js. In th0 (;quutions,
the Gire.bols i ond J c.l·e 1,.;sed as rOH und cc-lunn indices f-ar Lhe vectors and
metric8S, セ・ョッエゥョァ@ イ」]ーセ」エゥカ」ャケ@ goods end Frcducing s8ctors. The ー。イッセッエセイウ@
。イセ@ ァRョ・イNセQQケ@ denoted by ャッセ・イM」ッ」・@ i」エエセイウL@ セョ、@ cxogcnous v8ri3bles by
cqーゥエセャ@ Iottaro with bars undar エィセュセ@ Tho ゥョ、」セ・ウ@ t and 9 denote エゥセ・@
pcriods, eJll of length n yeors, セョ、@ alI エィセ@ カセLエBゥg「ャ」ウ@ Qre r,pecified in }'e'lrly
エ」イセ・N@ iイセエイゥク@ セオセエゥーャゥ」ッエゥッョ@ セョ、@ internol products bre dcnoted イ・」セ・」エゥカ・ャケ@
by a Etar cnd u dot セ」エキ」セョ@ エィセ@ two firrcye.
2 セッイイッセゥョ@ ゥエセセャヲ@ i6 not constrained. セッセ@ is tho VセカゥョYウ@ rote. since the エGLッセLIャ@ エN[Qiェoセ・V@ エィ」eセ@ laveis ャZ^セウ」、@ on cGcGセセBZイゥョァ@ COl'jts cnd bonofits ot t!le nc.rgir ••
-
-
--..
--
-..
-..
..
-..
--•
-
-5-2.1. Ob)octlve Function
The existence of a repreúentat1ve consu"er 1s ossuned, and tha ob]ective
function of tha plonning problcm is 」ッセーッウ・、@ of two ・ャ・セ・ョエウZ@ the sua over the
pIon horizon oí the total util1ty in eoch period properly discountcd Cat a
rata õ), plus tha discounted volua of post-terminal utility. Tha yoarly
ut11ity (Ut) and the,terminal utility are specified in ー・イM」。ーゥエセ@ terns, and
are セオャエゥーャゥ」、@ by population HセエI@ to obtain total セ・ャヲ。イ・N@
(1)
As discussed in s8ction 2.5, the ーッウエMエ・イセゥョ。ャ@ per-copito utiIity (V)
includes a penolty for the accuaulated foreign debt, セョ、@ a ーイ・セゥオョ@ for the
leveI of capital stock3 , which exist at the end of tha ャセウエ@ period. It
」ッセー・ョウ。エ・ウ@ for tha truncation of the エゥセ・@ horizon, assuming a stationary
stota provails in the ーッウエMエ・イセゥョ。ャ@ period 4 •
A generalizcd ャッァ。イQエィセゥ」@ function キセウ@ adopted to evaluate the utility
of alternative 」ッョSオセーエゥッョ@ vectors in each ー・セゥッ、@ (Ct)5, aainly bccause it
gives riso to an extended linear expenditure syste3
(ELES).
which has oftenbaan used in planning セッ、。ャウ@ of this typa to characteriza 」ッョウオセ。イ@ 、・セ。ョ、V@ •
3 Terninal útocks are not exogenously spocified as in other nodels in this
tredlt1on •
4 The エッイセゥョセャ@ utility term con be interproted as fulfilling the role of the
ーイゥセ。ャ@ oquilibrium 。ーーイックゥセ。エゥッョ@ in Svoronos (1985] "oqaezing" qQYPイゥエィセ@ for
infinite horizon convex prograns. I thank Alan Manne for pointing this out to
1118 •
5 Tha consunption vector includos non-cor.poting ipportcd 」ッョウオセーエゥッョL@ in
edditlon to the several othar produced goods.
6 for a discussion of extended linear expenditure systegs and their
application to Geveral countries, sse Lluch, Powoll and wゥャャゥッセウ@ (197}].
-
--
--
-...
-•
-
-6-The ー。イ。セ・エ・イウ@ of this per-capita ut11ity function are the vector of セ。イァゥョ。ャ@
expenditure sharea HセI@ and the vector of rゥセゥョオN@ leveIs of 」ッョウオセーエャッョ@ of each
good HセIN@
(2)
This obJective function ィセウ@ severa 1 desirable foatures lixe, for
・ク。セーャ・L@ ゥセーャケゥョァ@ a declining セ。イァゥョッャ@ utility of 」ッョFオセーエゥッョ@ for each good,
generating a full set of own and cross price olasticities, and internalizing
the sovings decision. For thls functional for., the elssticity of
5ubstitution of expendlture betwean two consecutiva tine periods is snaller
than unit y7, セョ、@ is increasing with inconG leveI, which is consistent with
・セーゥイゥ」。ャ@ evidence rcgarding 」ッョウオセ・イ@ 、セセセョ、@ in developing countries (5ee
chapter 4 in LLuch, pッセ・ャャ@ and wゥャャゥ。セウ@ (1977]). Rubinstein (1977] has 0150
offered o host of 。イァオセ・ョエウ@ why a function of this typa should be ヲセカッイ・、@ in
financa セッ、。ャウ@ for analyzing intertemporel choice, particularly under
uncertointy.
i.2
Constraints and TechnologyTha description of the technology, the resource 」ッョセエイ。ゥョエウL@ and the
balancillg equations follow the slondard nultisGctoral ッー・ョM・」ッョッセケ@ dynamic
fornulation (eee, for exempla, T6ylor (1975l). A Leontief ウー・」ゥヲゥ」セエャッョ@ ia
7 In tha linit, when tha ratio of tha セQQQQョuョ@ 」ッョウオセーエゥッョ@ leveI to actual
consumption for エィセ@ Goveral goods tends to zoro, the ovarall elosticity of
5ubstitution tends to that of the ウエセョ、ッイ、@ logorithDic lunction, which i5
un1ty.
--
-
-...
-...
-...
-
-7-usad to セッ、・ャ@ production in ・セ」ィ@ sactor8 , セゥエィ@ four categorias of inputs: internediate goods, non-competitive importa, 」。ーゥセ。ャL@ and labor.
Only labor ・セーャッケY、@ in tha ヲッイセ。ャ@ セ。イォ・エ@ i6 considered Gcarce and
included in the ヲッイセオャ。エゥッョL@ but its Gupply i6 not "odelled explicitly, baing
。ウウオセ・、@ to grow at an oxogonously spacifiad rata. Tha ゥセーッイエ。ョエ@ problea of absorbing the larga nu.bera of セ・ャ■M・。ーャッケ・、@ and ウオ「M・セーャッケ・、@ that exist in the Brazilian inforMol labor セ。イャセ・エ@ i6 not addro6sed herege A6 o consoquenca, tha shadow prica oí labor in the infornal sector is iaplicitly belng assumed to ba zero, which i6 an ・クエイ」セ。@ ッウウオセーエゥッョ@ セィゥ」ィ@ probably overstatos the leverage oí capital and foraal enploynent.
For the i56U96 oddrassed in thi6 ーセー・イL@ tha foreign exchonge balance restriction ーャセケウ@ a crucial role, allowing tha セッ、。ャ@ to endogenously caleulata tha borrowing イ・アオゥイ・セXョエV@ in each period. cッセー・エゥエゥカ・@ ゥセーッイエウ@ are ー・イセゥエエ・、@
in the セ。エ。イゥ。Q@ balances equation, ond ョッョセ」ッ。ーセエゥエゥカ・@ ゥセーッイエウ@ ara required for dor.eatic production. For ウゥセーャゥ」ゥエケL@ o linear function was adopted to
calculote tha export revenues ond ゥセーッイエ@ oxpenditures oí oach sector, but the exogenous vGctors of foreign prices can be voried to troce tha 」」ッョッセケGウ@
Gupply and deDond Gehedules in variou6 scenarios. ャi。クゥセオセ@ exports of each
」ッセセッ、ゥエケ@ in oach period were however apocified, ゥセーャケゥョァ@ that the セ。イォ・エ@
セッ、ッャ@ under1ying the export aector is 」ッセー・エゥエゥカ。@ only up to that exogenous l!ait10 •
8 Endogonous technologico1 choiee in production eould have baen 805i1y
included in the セッ、・ャL@ had tha required data been available, by edding coluMns corresponding to tho difíoront alternativa エセ」ィョッャッァゥ・ウN@
9 For 1983, tho opproxinote 6iza of the "infornal" セッイォ・エ@ i6 6.9 .il110n rural
and 9.6 million urben workors. This ・ッセーッイPU@ with.7.4 セゥャャゥッョ@ rural and 23.9 al1110n オイ「セョ@ セッイャZ・イ・@ enployed in the fornal narket in that year.
10 Unfortunato1y thi6 Vー・」ゥヲゥ」セエゥッョ@ QOy lead to VPセ。@ degroe of "bong-bang" bohavior, in that the セッ、。ャ@ will in general spociolize, oxporting up to the
...
-
...
-
--
-...
-
-8-2.j.
Forelgn Borrowing and Oebt ServlceBy aaking the tlae path oí borrowing 」ョ、ッァ・ョッオXセ@ the セッ、・ャ@ slaulates actual policy choice and allows the ・」ッョッセケ@ to gゥセオャエッョ・ッオgャケ@ adJust tha laveI of donestic econo.ic ectivities Gnd oí ゥセーッイエウN@ However. thera nust ba
provision for ー。ケセ・ョエ@ of intGrost and repaynent of principal either boiora or efter the セッ、ッャGX@ tiao horizon. A certa in fraction of total debt co.es dua in each period. but it con bo rolled over by contracting for セ、、ゥエゥッョ。ャ@
borrowing, although parhaps at a higher intorest rata.
Foroign debt is セッ、・ャャ・、@ here using a vintoge セッ、・ャ@ in order to properly account for tha effect of the ウゥエオセエゥッョ@ of the foreign セ」」ッオョエウ@ on tllQ total interest ー。ケセ・ョエXN@ To indicato this. let O g,t be the d8bt contractod in
period 9 held at gエセイエ@ of period t. whera the indox 9 runs ヲイッセ@ O to t-1. The following oquation shows its dynanic5, given イ・ー。ケセ・ョエ@ (R) and borrowing (S) flows, 。ウウオセャョァ@ that セヲエqイ@ an initlel 。セッオョエ@ ia borrowed in a period. it can only be repaid loter 11 • Since those aro both yeorly flow5, they セイ・@ entGred lnto tho debt belanc3 equation セオャエゥーャゥ・、@ by the nuubcr of years per period. Tha second oquation below defines ncxt yoar'a dobt oí one period of age as equal to tha ウオセ@ of tha yearly flows of this poriod's borrowing.
linit in the nore attractive &cctors. ond not at ali (or only residuolly) in the イ。セ。ゥョゥョァ@ ones. This could havo boan セカッゥ、・、@ by incorporating into the セッ、。ャ@ non-lincer cxport revenue íunctions. セイッョ@ the セ。エィ」セ。エゥ」。ャ@ 6nd
。QYPイゥエィセゥ」@ point of vicw this would hava bcen possible. but tho ヲオョ」エゥッョセャ@ specificationc and ・」エゥセ。エ・V@ of the relovant paranetors セッイg@ not イ・セ、ゥャケ@ available. &0 that lhis extonsion could not bo dona raliably at tha オッセ・ョエN@
11 Tha ropaynont &chodule (RO.t) of initial ycar ctabt (00,1) is known. セョ、@ i5 usod In the recuraion of equatlon
(3).
-...
-...
...
-
-...
-
--(3)
-9-D
g,t+l =D
g,tD
t,t+l•
- n
R
g,t for all t and Ofgft-l for alI t
The イ・ー。ケセッョエ@ &chedula on any poriod's borrowing is 。FFオセセ、@ to be exogenously specifiod, and i6 independent of the period in whieh borrowing occurs. Thls ャセーャゥgs@ that the fraction of the borrowlng dane in period 9
セィゥ」ィ@ i5 anortizad in a later period t 」セョ@ be calculated セウ@ a function (r) of tha dlfferGnco b8tw2en thesa エセッ@ àates. Thls sinple ヲッイセオQXエャッョ@ does not conüider changes in the イッー。ケセ・ョエ@ profile of tha debt12 , which may howGvor be
a v.atter of policy choiee for sOMa eountries. In the context of tho セッ、・ャ@
this iSSU9 i6 botter セ、、イ・ウウ・、@ through &Gnsitivity ッョセャケウゥウL@ since changes in the naturity セイ・@ usually associated with changcs in the interest rates.
(5)
R
g,t = r t-gB
9 for all 9 and tIn ardor to 」。ャ」オャセャ・@ tha intúrost cost, lhis セッ、qャ@ reco9nizes that a larga fraction of tha debt 」ッョエイセ」エg、@ in tha international ヲゥョセョ」ゥ。ャ@ rnarxet by developingcountries oecrues intcrest on tha bosis of 8 floating rata (l.e.
LIBOR) plus a sprcad, which supposedly reflacts the ・ッオョエイケMセーg」ゥヲゥ」@ risk. The debt of dQvolQping eountrios olso usually has o fiy.ed rotG conponent
associatcd with loans by foraign ァッカ・イョセッョエウ@ and official institutiona,
ウッュ・エゥセgg@ in praferontiol terms. Since tha likelihood of largo interest Gubnidics to Brazil through fixed-rate ャッセョウ@ in the futura ia snall, it was
12 This is true oxcopt for tho changcs that occur as a result of tha Yイ。、オセQ@
shift ヲイッセ@ the イ・ーセケセ」ョエ@ profilo of lha ゥョゥエゥセャ@ dobt to tha ono inplied by lhe applic3tion of the ropaynent function spocifiad obova to futura borrowing. To the oxtent エィセエ@ the function r 15 derivod ヲイッセ@ tho forecost イ・ーッケセ・ョエ@ stroa. on initial debt, thi8 ehange ia gセ。ャャN@
-...
--
...
--
...-...
--
...-...
-
-..
-10-cssuned that alI of the dabt ゥセ@ subJect to the floating schefte. This is
hO.9ver only a siRplification. since tha セッ、YQ@ can be easily oxtsnded to allow
for this other type of debt.
As with alI othar voriablos in this Rodal. interest paynents are
calculatod in real エqイセVN@ oxcluding tha effects of inflation of the currency
in which the dübt ia dGnonin6tod. If イ・ー。ケセ・ョエウ@ for actual borrowing are
givan in ョッセゥョセャ@ エolセUN@ higher inflation in the lending country decreases the
real valua 13 of tho dcbt at ony point in tiGa. This effoct of foreign
inflution can be sioulated in tho nodal considering o ヲセウエ・イ@ repaynent
8chcdule on the real dcbt.
Therefore, in any given yoar, interest payGcnta on total debt have t.o
」ッセーッョ・ョエウZ@ tho first ia proportionul to tho real interest rnte, which is
・クッァ・ョッオセ@ and con changa each period, and the sacond i5 a function of the
sprQod イセエ」U@ contractod for in provious borrowing, which i6 fixod for the life
of lhe 10an. As shown in oquation
HセIL@
the offoctive intorest rate on debtis tha Fuセ@ of the renl intercst rata <h) セョ、@ lho GndogenouG spreed rate (SH):
(6)
H
g,t =D
ァLセ@ for alI t and 9
It vas 。Uウオセ。、@ here that these &prood rates 3ra a stationary linear
function (with slope セIN@ of the ratio of cnnual borrowing to on index of roal
ゥョ」ッセ・N@ This indcx i3 approxinated by add1ng the scctoral voluo added, eõch
」。ャ」オャセエ・、@ os エィセ@ product of ァイッセウ@ output ond ths initinl yoor Ghnres (6
vecLor vo)14.
13 i.e. doflatod by rrice ind8x of the currGncy of den03ination.
14 iョ」ッセ・@ as Guch i5 not ・カセゥャッ「ャ。@ in tha prinal of セッ、。ャN@ sinca it depends on
tho 」ィセ、ッキ@ pricc5 of lho 8oyoral goods. HowQver, lhe indax of grosa 、ッセッgエゥ」@
product ot b08e year prices, which ia used ・セッカ・L@ con always bo constructcd.
-
-
-
-...-...
-
-
-11-(7) for alI t
The rotionale underlying oquotion (7) i& tho standard Capital Asset Pricing セッ、・ャ@ HcapャセI@ for financiaI markets15 , coupled with tho 。ウウオセーエゥッョ@ that higher values oí ァイッセウ@ borrowillg (relativa to ゥョ」ッセッI@ セイ・@ perceivcd by 1enders as 6igno15 of highor volati1ity of future loturns on thoir 100n5. tセゥウ@
6uggests that the opread rate contractcd for 10ans ta)(en out in a given year shou1d be a function of Lhe 9r055 leveI of borrowing in that SOES year.
This ヲッイセオQPエゥッョ@ 1s cast in a 10ng run perspectiva, and is ofíered on1y os a reesonab1e way to 100k et the cost of Eurobond funes from tbe borrower's point-of-view, ond not as an analysis oí the rationol 、・エ・イセゥョ。エゥッョ@ oí spread rates in that セ。イォ・エN@ Note 01so that thi5 ヲッイセオQ。エゥッョ@ ollow& tho country to 8ct ウッセ・カィ。エ@ like a iaonopsonist, sinca ot the optirna1 co1ution the narginal costa of foreign borrowing are equoted with its セ。イァゥョ・ャ@ productivity.
aQエセイョ。エゥカ・@ セクーQ。ョ。エッイケ@ カセイゥセ「ャ・ウ@ for the sprcad rate function セ・イ・@
considered (soa Tourinho(1985b), but tha ana tldoptcd セG。S@ prüferred both due to ゥエセ@ properties and ウセエゥウヲ・」エッイケ@ ・セーゥイゥ。ャヲゥエN@ Thc usa of net borrcwing, instead of gros5 borrowing, in tha spread rate function セ。ウ@ Gvoided because the sGvera1 equations that were cstinated involving that varioble イNセ、@ poor atatiitical resu1ts. This negativa result can be rationalized ii in the Eurobond horket the lending decision· ia evaluated indcpendently of the rapaynonls of proviaus borrowing, which セッオQ、@ bo the 」セウ・@ if in each period tha londers wara not forced to reíinanca pGst 100n8, 05 セ・・イN・、@ to happen until
a fow yoars agc.
15 It statcs that 50curitios with higher undiv0rsifiab1G risk セuFエ@ 」ッイNセXョ、@ a highar intorsst ーイッセゥオセ@ ovor the イゥセォャ・gF@ rota than the ones with lcwsr risk.
-...
-
--
-•
-
-
-12-Tha usa of a specification involving debl as an explanatory variabla for each pariod's spread waa avoided because, bafng stocx variabla, debt ia apt to change only slowly and not captura tha dynanics of the rate if, for exaaple, borrowing were drastically reducod. Tho dabt service to axport ratio, which ia also a naturel explenatory var1able and does not suffor from th1a
」イゥエセ」ゥUaL@ was 。「セョ、ッョ・、@ because of an unsatlsfactory cnpirlcal fito Howcver,
an equation using the debt to ゥョ」ッセ・@ ratio as the independent variobla fitted
wall tha data, and セ。ウ@ usod to calculato tha sprcad rate in the ーッウエMエ・イセゥョ。ャ@ period, and in the sensitivity onolY81a.
2tf. Ternina! Stocks and Post-ternlnal Utility
asgオセゥョァ@ that a stationary ato te pravails in the ーッウエMエ・イセゥョッャ@ period, the expression for tha ー・イM」セーゥエッ@ infinita horizon 。ーーイックゥセ。エゥッョ@ ter. (V) con ba derivod by calculating the indirect utility function セウウッ」ゥセエ・、@ with the utility functlon in (1) and (2) at the tcrninal dote. Aa in equation (8), it
can be セイゥエエ・ョ@ as 5-1 tiNes ü generalized logarithmic function of エ・イセゥョッャ@
ゥョ」ッセ・LG@ キゥセィ@ total ninirnua Expendituro cqual to the Gum of tha セゥョゥrオN@
expenditures on tho several goods (7i in (2»16. The intuition is clear: it ia thG present velua of cn infinita gエイ・セョ@ of slngle-period stationary utility
(hence tha エ・イセ@ セMQI@ affordcd by tha supernur.erary ゥョ」ッセ・@ flow.
The total エ・イセゥョ。ャ@ ゥョ」ッセ・@ ia the SUQ aí tha lebor ゥョ」ッセ・L@ plua the return (at a rate セI@ on tha 。」」オセオャッエ・、@ capital stock (KT). leS5 the interest cost of エ・セュゥョ。ャ@ debt (DT). Tha tarminal ャ。「ッイᄋゥョ」ッセ・@ (YT) and tha yoarly
16 It i6 セ@ bit tediou6 to show thia. To do it. Fオセウエゥエオエ。@ tha linear 、・セ。ョ、@
!unctions of
ELES
「セ」ォ@ into the ッ「ェセ」エゥカ。L@ and integrate by parls.-
--
--
-
-...
•
-
-13-return on terminal capital stocK (p) are considared hera to be exogenous, but
can ba ・ウエゥセ。エ・、@ on tha basia of ウッセ・@ ーイ・Qゥセゥョ。イケNイオョ。N@ This exogoneity was
r.aintoined to avoid complicating too Duch the shadow-prico structura oí the
セッ、・QN@ Letting tlT dGnote tho population at the end of the ャセウエ@ period, and
recalling that
V
voa opecified in per-cepita エ・イセ。L@ the following oquationdisplays tha exprcnnion íor the per-capita エ」イセゥョ。ャ@ utillty.
(8)
V
=
S
-1 10gC(YT
+ p KT - HT) / NTThe ゥョエqイ・セエ@ ーセケィ・ョエ@ on the terminel debt in the equation セ「ッカ・@
(HT>
15ca1culated in (9), Ilhere tha interoat rata ia ッウウオセッ、@ to ba equal to tha roal
LIBOR
plus a Gpreod rata Ilhich i5 calculatad as a linoar function (with slopeセ^@ of tha sizo of total debt rolativo to the index of real ゥョ」ッセッ@ defined
prGviou51y17. This ゥセーャゥ・ウ@ that tha cost of terninal 、セ「エN@ セィゥ」ィ@ reducos tha
post-torD1nal gオーイッョオセッイ。イケ@ incoRe, 15 a quadratic function of lho dobt.
(9)
HT
=(hT
+ セ@ (DT / 1'T )] DT
3. HODEL
iセpleQセntation@The nodal uas Bpp1ied to Brazil with a horizon covering twenty-íour
yeara froR 1984 to 2008, which ia divided into 6 pariods of 4 years.
eョ、ッセqョouU@ voriables and balances セイ・@ ・セエャョgエ・、@ at the 「セァゥョqゥョァ@ of each
pariod. The lUGt p2riod ends in 2008, the dato ftt which tho terhinal
17 Tha 」セセgョエウ@ nade in connection with equation ( 6) olso apply hera, in
analogQu5 ヲッセセN@ eアオセエゥッョG@
9>
qャセッ@ has a sntisfactory enpiricol fit for thaCrazl11en dota.
-
-...
-
--...
-
-14-eondition セッイュ@ of tha obJactiva functlon 16 evoluoted.18 • The eonfidenea that is oeeorded to tha resulta for tha loat porioda should taka into aeeount tha faet that soma parameters of tha real ・・ッョッセケL@ whlch eorrespond to
coeffieients which are fixed in tha nodal. セ。ケ@ changa over such o 10n9 tima span. Tho ッ」ッョッセケ@ la divldod into nina producing sectors: (1) agricultura, (2) ogro-processing, (3) construction. (4) monufacturing of capital gooda. (5) other manufacturing, (6) ーッエイッャ・オセL@ (7) utilities (oloctrlcity, water,
90S), (8) tronsport and 」odセオョゥ」。エゥッョL@ (9) services.
Tha セッ、。ャ@ was ゥセーャ・セ・ョエ・、@ with tha usa of tha GAMS セ。エイゥク@ gonerator セョ、@ solved by the non-lin6ar ーイッァイ。セセゥョァ@ ーセ」ォ。ァ・@ HIHOS19. It haa 7 non-lineor equations, and its coefficients セ。エイゥク@ has 350 rows, 484 eolunns and 1685 non-zero ・ャ・セ・ョエgN@ At the ッーエゥセオセL@ 48 non-linear variables are super-bosic20 •
It should be ・セーィ。ウゥコッ、@ that MINOS 5.0, baing a non-linear progranning package, cannot in general roach exact optiffiol Golutions. Rathar, it stops at an 。ーーイックゥセッエ・@ optinal solution where tha roduced gradient is zero up to ウッセ・@ vary ウセッャャ@ toleronca. The 。ャァッイゥエィセ@ was ッャセ。IGウ@ able to converge to the optinal solution, os 10ng 05 the key parar.etera (discount rate, LIBOR rate,
etc.) W8ra in the range セ[ィ・イ・@ the behavlor of the 、ケョ。セゥ」@ system undGrlying
18 The accuracy of the infinite horizon 。ーーイックゥセッエゥッョN@ evaluated by of extanding tho セッ、ッャ@ to a largar ョオセ「・イ@ of pGriods, is 、ゥセ」オssX、@ in the next section
19 For an introduction to those prograr.s, E9Q respectivoly Kendrick and
m・・イセオウ@ [1985], and ャャオセエ。ァィ@ and SaundGrs [1983]. Tha author wishes to thank Sethu Palanieppon for providing several hints 011 ィッセ@ to ゥイNーャ・セッョエ@ the セッ、・ャ@ in
the GAnS ャVョァオ。ァセN@
20 Solution エゥセ・@ froR a "cold Gtart" on o CYBER Bochino セ。ウ@ 17 seconds, but the nodol con be run in an IBM PC with G40k and ョuセXイゥ」@ co-procesGor in about 4 hours. The nodal wcs developed uóing thG ャャ。ゥョヲイセイN。@ vorsion of tha software becaune of lts foater turn-around tiae.
--
-
---
--
--
-
-
-15-the ーイッァイッセセゥョァ@ modsl セッウ@ stabla. On non-stobla poths it foiled in ウッセ・@
instances to find a Golution with the specified prccision.
3.1 d・エセ@ base セウエイオ」エゥッョRQ@
セッウエ@ of the dato for inplenenting tha nodol con be infarrcd ヲイッセ@ tha
inters8ctoral エイセiQgッ」エゥッョウ@ ond final 、gセ。ョ、ウ@ tablo for 1983 (Appcndix A>,
セィゥ」ィ@ vos constructcd by updating the set of prelininary エセ「ャ・ウ@ for 1975
obtained ヲイッセ@ tho Brazilicn GtutiGtics institute (IBGE)22. lhe units for alI
the cocnoditien and factors in the セッ、・ャ@ are consistent with this エセ「ャ・@ end
ore àcfined as the quantitios th3t could ba uought with one CR$ billion in
1983. iセーャゥ」ゥエ@ in this àGfinition is the hypothcsis that the oggrcgotion
within oach GQctor 1s on the basis of initial year prices. Tha other
ゥセーッセエ」ョエ@ Gõta itcr.$ for tha "odel are gィッセョ@ in Tõble 3.1 and wera obteined as
follow8.
Tha ーセイサャ[イNGNSエャ_イウ@ of th3 utility function (the ",cctors セ@ .:llld ')) \iere
calculeted by constrúinlng the lincer ・ケNー・ョ、ャエセ・@ ウygエ・セ@ to rcproJuce Lhe 1975
cons'.lí:ption vector, セョ、@ uGing the incor.le 」ャセウエゥ」ゥエゥ・ウ@ 」ウエゥャ[セエ・、@ by |hャャゥ\Qャセウッョ@
ond l:cCorthy [1981]. Thcse voluos ゥセイャケ@ an ovarall elosticity of substitution
equal to 0.54 in 1933. The discount rata of Tセ@ uscd in the utiliLy iunction
iG 」ッョセゥウエッョエL@ givcn the ャセョイァゥョqャ@ sQvings rate of .84 ゥセーャゥ・、@ by the セGウ@ of
21 The construction of tho 、。エ。「セウ・@ for the nodal is 、gF」イゥ「セ、@ l'oro fully in
Tour jnl10 [l9<}Sb].
22 uョヲッイエオョセエ」ャケ@ it was not feasiblo, given th8 エゥセッ@ ッケセゥャ。「ャセ@ for the dota
col18ction, to gゥョオャエセョセqオUQケ@ セッゥョエョゥョ@ tho 」oセgゥセエ・ョ」ケ@ of tlle QセWU@ エセ「ャッ@ ond
ッエエセゥョ@ cn cxnct ッイイ・ウーッョ、セョ」ッ@ with tho ャャセエゥッョセャ@ セ」」ッオョエウ@ 「セSイ」jッエ・ウ@ íor 1983.
The gセp@ 1n the updoted table ia QPセ@ セセrャャ」イ@ thbn lhe value 1n ャャャセ@ ッ」セッオョエ。L@ in
part bacG\lso a [Z[ゥコ」セ「ャ・@ 、ゥセイGZxMイ_ー。ョ」ケ@ alrcod)' ・クゥUエセ、@ in the 1975 toble ..
-...
-
-
---
-...
--
-...
-...
-
-16-Tabla 3.1, with on overaga net roal yeorly return on personol ウセカゥョァウ@ of 5%.
Tóia value ia quite roasonable, given that the real coupon rate on indaxed
passboox savings in bイセコゥャ@ i6 Vセ@ •
The copitol-output and ャセ「ッイMッオエーオエ@ ccefficionts wera derived ヲイッセ@ the
respGctive ヲセ」エッイ@ shores セッォゥョァ@ usa oí ウッセ。@ dopreciation and profit rotes dota
contained in Lysy セョ、@ Taylor [1980]23.
Table 3.1
Parenetera of utility and production functions
=============================================================================
Marginal l'!inimulI Capital Depre- Labor
consur.p. /total /gro5s clation /gross
shores consump. output <yearly) output
SECTOR5/GOODS HセI@ 1983 00 retio <") ra.tlo
Synbols
Agriculture 2.41 70.8 2.600 1.6 0.1340
Agro-processing 7.63 70.8 1.520 3.7 0.0504
Constl:uction 0.572 4.2 0.1607
Man. capital.90ods 5.01 28.4 1.092 4.0 0.0845
nan. othar goods 16.46 30.2 1.278 3.6 . 0.0784
Petroleull. 3.97 42.9 2.075 3.6 0.0341
Utllities 2.72 25.4 3.556 3.4 0.1866
Transport & COk\lllun. 7.09 22.6 0.935 4.5 0.2470
Services 37.72 46.8 2.354 3.9 0.1923
Non-coJ:1pot. imports 0.79 52.0
Avorage 1.769 0.1226
]]]]]]Z]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]セ]]]]]]セ]]]]]]]Z]]]]]]]]]]]] ]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]@
23 A キセイョゥョY@ ia in order セ「ッオエ@ the re1iobility of the 、ッエセN@ Prinory data on
sactorol capital-output coofficients |セqs@ not 。カ。ゥャセ「ャ。L@ so they hod to ba
・ウエゥョセエ」、@ indirectly os describod in the エセクエN@ Vory littlo ゥョヲッイイNセエゥッョ@ about
tha セ。イァゥョッャ@ ゥョカッウエセッョエ@ shares セ。エイゥク@ (b) 6Kists in Brazil, 60 it hod to be
constructed piecing togcther ゥョヲッイョセエゥッョ@ ヲセッョ@ セ・カqイ。ャ@ sourcos, ond does not
have セオ」ィ@ hard data to support it. A properly ・ウエゥセlエq、@ linoar Gxponditure
ウケウエ・セ@ |iセs@ 01so not セカセゥャ。「ャ・L@ but tho elosticitios thot were オウセ、@ ore not
expected to be vary for ヲイッセ@ tho corroct ones. Finally, tho pOSGibility thot
any of thoGO ーoイoセqエXイ@ セ。ケ@ not bo Vエセ「ャq@ through tino セqケ@ cor-pound any errors
in the ・ウエゥセ。エゥッョN@ Sinca no paJor doto collaction offort could be Rode for
this pro)cct, we had to do our bost with tha data on ィセョ、L@ but it セオウエ@ be
emphosizod that furthar work to volidota thesG coafficionts i6 nocessary.
-
-...
...
-
--
--
-
-17-Tho elopa of the function オセ・、@ to colcultlta the Gpreod rato in ooch
pariod (equotion ( 6» セョ、@ of tho ーッウエMエ」イセゥョッャ@ interost cost function
(oquation
(!)»
ore イカセーX」エゥカXャケ@ a = 29.69 セョ、@ セ@ = 5.25, with tho spread rateiri ー」イ」・ョエセァ・@ points. They were obtoined froA an analysis, using セゥョーャ・@
linear regression24 , of the イgセャ@ ャgセ、ゥョァ@ ratcs for Erazil in the EUrODQnd
J:'Hlrlwt b'3t .... 8I3n 1974 alld 15'84. It \.lOS ,::ceUi'.Sd thllt theG8 bahnviot-al n?l.::tions
will continue to hold in the futu4e, in üpite of thc fact that エィセイ・@ i3 no セ@
priori rcoson .... hy thiG should be 60. If the institutional 。イセオョァセョセョエウ@ for
borrowing by d2\'eloping countries chllnge in the futura, [,e .... l"ules t.o d?tr:rr"line
tha ゥョエセイ・ウエ@ cost of debt will hove to bo illcluded into tho セq、XャN@
Tha yearly roto of growth of ーッーオャセエゥッョ@ cnd lebor forca Ilere ッUウオセッ、@ to
be 2.5% セiャ、@ 3% respectiv8ly, con3istcntly with ィゥウエッイゥ」セャ@ 「Xィセカゥッイ@ and sore
recent proJ8ctions dono in B::'.:Izil. Tha rata of ャ。「ッイMャャオァャaGZセョエゥョァ@ エ・」ィョゥ」セャ@
progrcss U5G aGGuued to be Rセ@ ケセ。イャケN@
gッカ・イョセ」ョエ@ ・クセ・ョ、ゥエオイ」。@ ure セウウオセ」、@ to grow at thp sdセc@ rale as
ーッーセャセエゥッョ@ growth, which ゥセーャゥqウNエィgケ@ are ゥョ・ャセウエゥ」@ with イogーセ」エ@ to ー。セM」。ーゥエセ@
incone. This i5 not lhe usual ・セウオセーエゥッョ@ in セッ、。ャセ@ for Brazil, but this
ーセイ。セqエ・イ@ 」セョ@ be oasily varied to check tha 6cnsitivity of エィセ@ Golution to
it25 •.
24 Tha
n
2 for the two ・ャオッエゥッセウ@ wara respDctivüly .47 nnd .50 and bothcoefficiontü oro signific.:lnt at the UセG@ levol.
25 vセイゥセエゥッョウ@ in tha gl"owth イセエ。@ of governu&nt ックー・B、ゥエオイセセ@ in tha イッセセッョ。「ャ・@
ranSB ara not oxpoctüd to ィセ|G。@ ony ゥョーセ」エ@ 00 lllO conclusions of tho
censitivity onalYBia oí cection 5.
--
-
---
-
----
--
--
--
--
--
-
-18-for the base case ウ」・ョセイゥッRVL@ the following od-hoc ossuaptions were セッ、・@
with regords to the volues of the イ・セッゥョゥョY@ ーッイッセ・エ・イVN@ The real LIBOR rata
stabilizea at 5% ケセXイャケL@ slightly lower than the current leveI, and does not
return to tha vcry low leveIs of the eorly '70s. The セ。クゥュオセ@ ycarly growth
rate of agricultural and manuíactured exporta ia equal to 5% and 10%
respectively, envisioning an yeorly rate of increase of intarnational 」ッセュ・イ」・@
of Uセ@ and セッイォ・エ@ shore increasga for Brazilian aanufoctured gooda. It ia
" assuged that domestic patroleum production stabilizes at a laveI of 600
エィッオ・セョ、@ bbl/day in accordance with recent forecasts, but that the gross
output of tha sBctor expands only to incorporate the value of the increased
production. This ゥセーャゥXウ@ a rather extrene assullIptic'n that the refining
sub-sector does not ・クーセョ、@ obove its basa-year capacity, and that in the ュ・、ゥオセ@
and long ter a the 、・セ。ョ、@ increases are supplied with ゥセーッイエウ@ of refined
products 27 • The torns of trade are assurned stable at the 1983 leveI.
5ensitivity anolysis with rüspect to thase parameters is shown in section 5.
Finally, due to tho difficulties with finding a dieaggregated estinate
oí capacity utilizotion appropriate to the ヲイ。セ・キッイォ@ oí the nodel,
full-・セーャッスGェQ・ョエ@ ...,as u"ssulled to prevail in 1'383, in spi te of the fact that i t \0,'05 a
イ・セッウウゥッョ@ year. In addition, since cyclical d6partures ヲイッセ@ full ・セーャッケュ・ョエ@
are difficult to ィセョ、ャ・@ in models of this typa, ・クー・イゥセ・ョエウ@ were not セ。、。@ to
verify whether the inclusion of slacka in the reGource conctraints for the
26 It セョョッエ@ La gャャーィセウゥコッ、@ enough that thesa ore only scenorio& for ー。イ。セ」エ・イウ@
whoSG futuro GVOllltion we know vcry littla about. and era not pro]ections of
lhe nost ャゥセ・ャケ@ cour3e of aventa.
27 Thi& セ。ケ@ not have baen a veri good 。ウウオセーエゥッョN@ but it ia not 」ッセーャッエ。ャケ@
unreaconeblc ・」ッョッセゥ」。ャャケ@ in light of the large incrcaces in Middlc-Eastern
re!ining capacity which are schaduled to occur in lhe next few yeors •.
---
-
-
-...
...
-
-..
---
-
-
-19-initiol period would leod to イ・セgッョセ「ャ・@ イッウオャエRセ@ This 」セウオョーエゥッョ@ however does
not seç.m to be overly ーNッ「ャ」ュセエゥ」@ for the long-run colculotions for which this
nodol i5 Guitubla.
Tha イoFエMエXイセゥョセQ@ n2t return on セーェエ。ャ@ (p) ィセ、@ lo be Gsticated by
insuring that the rョョセ。ケ@ equation be satisfied at th8 「セウゥョョゥョァ@ of the セッ、・ャGウ@
. n ..
post-ternin'll pC'riod. It cl!n bC! :;ho·..;n,Va gゥセーャゥヲゥ・、@ 'iersion of a similar
l1odel, エィセエ@ the ・アオゥャゥ「イゥオセ@ condition イ・、オセU@ to Gxpression (10)28, where the
rate oí d2cline of the per-cepita セXイァゥョ。ャ@ utility can be approximated locally
by the rate of incroQse of ー・イM」。セゥエ。@ 」ッョウオセーエゥッョ@ divided by the overal1
Ol3Sticity of substitution.
(10)
i
iャセイァゥョセャ@ !.";]telof côpital
productivity = l
utilil
Y
I iイセエ・@ of decline I、ゥセ」ッオョエ@ + of ー・イM」セーゥエ。@
rate r.argin31 utility
Recall thot tha 「セsgMc。セX@ discount rale (S) is ond note エィセエ@ the
ョ」クゥセオイョ@ ウオセエ。ゥョg「ャッ@ fッセエMエgイセゥョセャ@ rata of Yイッセエィ@ of p0r-capitG 」ッョウオセーエゥッョ@ is
tha sum of the rote of labor-cugnenting エ・」ィョゥ」セャ@ progress HRセI@ pllJS the rato
of increaso in tha lcbor rurket ーセイエゥ」ゥー」エゥッョ@ イセエ・@ HoNUセIN@ The ela3ticity of
st.rb::.titution in エィセ@ e>;tendod linG\lr gケNーイセョ、ゥエオャᄋ・@ Gyst!2JlI, 5i\'on the Yイッセjエィ@ ョセエ」ウ@
8ssuned õbove for population ond per-capita ゥョ」ッセ・L@ セッオャ、@ averoge obout 0.66
during the planning pGriod. tィセイッヲッイ。L@ tho 」セーイックゥセ。エgN@ rnta of セg」ャゥョ。@ of Lhe
pqイM」Sーゥエセ@ Acrginal utility is SN・セL@ and lhe 、ゥセ」イqエッMエゥョ。@ 」ウエゥセ。エ」@ of the
roturn on capitol for the post-tGrginal period (p) is O.Ot.
28 l:otG thG 。「セ。ョ」g@ of the po?ulõtion growth rotg fron (Ie), dua to the fact
thet in tt.e :::>l.J]octivo :unclicn (1) lha イᄋZZIZゥNャセセB」エ@ iú the su:. of utility across
811 individu31!3.