Volume1|Issue1|Page022
PLoSBiology|http://biology.plosjournals.org PLoSBiology|http://biology.plosjournals.org Volume1|Issue1|Page023
I
n1928theGermanbotanistEmil Heitzvisualisedinmossnuclei chromosomalregionsthatdonot undergopostmitoticdecondensation (Heitz1928).Hetermedtheseparts ofthechromosomesheterochromatin, whereasfractionsofthechromosome thatdecondenseandspreadout diffuselyintheinterphasenucleusare referredtoaseuchromatin.Further studiesrevealedthatheterochromatin canbefoundinallhighereukaryotes, mainlycoveringregionswitha lowfrequencyofgenes,suchas pericentromericregionsandtelomeres. Heitzproposedthatheterochromatin relectsafunctionallyinactivestateof thegenome,andwenowknowthat DNAinheterochromaticregionsis lessaccessibletonucleasesandless susceptibletorecombinationevents. Alltheseindingscontributedtothe currentviewthatheterochromatinis arigidnuclearcompartmentinwhich transcriptionallyinactiveregionsof chromatinaredenselypackedand inaccessibletothetranscription machinery(GrewalandElgin2002). Thisviewwaschallengedearlierthis yearintwopaperspublishedback-to-backinScience(Cheutinetal.2003; Festensteinetal.2003).Certainproteinsarespeciically associatedwithheterochromatin— notably,thefamilyofheterochromatin protein1(HP1)(EissenbergandElgin 2000;SinghandGeorgatos2002). HP1isthoughttoplayacentralrole increatingastableandinaccessible heterochromaticnetworkbyinteracting withseveralotherproteins,including histones,themajorproteinconstituent ofallchromatin.Inparticular,HP1 bindstothetailofthehistoneH3when ithasbeenmodiiedbymethylation oflysine9.Thishistonemodiication isanimportantlandmarkofinactive chromatinregions.
InthetwoarticlesinScience,both groupsgeneratedcelllinesstably expressingHP1fusedtogreen
luorescentprotein(GFP)sothat theycouldwatchthebehaviourof HP1inlivingcells.Speciically,they usedphotobleachingtechniquesto studytheinvivomobilityofHP1.Ina deinedregionofacell,luorescently taggedproteinsarebleachedbyalaser pulse.Recoveryofluorescenceinthe bleachedareacanthenonlyoccur ifbleachedmoleculesarereplaced withunbleachedmoleculesfrom regionsoutsidethebleachedarea. Thetechniqueiscalledluorescence recoveryafterphotobleaching(FRAP) andprovidesinformationaboutthe mobilityandstabilityofthecellular structuresandproteins.ForHP1–GFP, thespeedatwhichluorescence recoversdependsonhowtightlyitis boundwithinheterochromaticregions. Heitz(andmanyothers)mighthave expectedthatheterochromatin-boundHP1showslittleturnoverand thereforerecoveryshouldtakeplace veryslowly.
Cheutinetal.(2003)irst
demonstratedthattheheterochromatic regionsvisualisedwithHP1–GFPare stableinshapeforatleast2h.By contrast,subsequentFRAPexperiments revealedthatHP1proteinshavea surprisinglyhighturnoverratein heterochromaticclustersaswell asinregionstheauthorsdeineas euchromatic(Figure1).Recovery of50%wasreachedafter2.5sin heterochromatinandafter0.6sin euchromatin.Incontrast,forhistone proteins,thestructuralprotein componentsofchromatin,50% recoverytookmorethan2h(Kimura andCook2001).Cheutinetal.found thatcompleterecoveryofbleached HP1took5sineuchromatinand60s inheterochromatin.Festensteinetal. (2003)report,however,thatrecovery onlyreaches90%ineuchromatinand 70%inheterochromatin.Incomplete recoverywouldpointtoanimmobile populationofHP1thatdoesnot exchangerapidly.Infact,suchastable fractioncouldbeindicativeofastable structuralnetworkmadeofaminor fractionofHP1thatcouldserveas anucleationsiteforamoremobile fractionofHP1.Inmyopinion,this
shouldbekeptinmind,evenif100% recoveryisobserved.Itmightwell bethatafewstablyassociatedHP1 moleculesthatremainundetected inFRAPstudiesexertanimportant structuralfunctioninheterochromatin formation.Consequently,thiscanbe regardedasanimportantdiscrepancy betweenthetwostudies.Bothstudies alsoreportedanumberofother experimentsinwhichthecondensation stateofchromatinwasmodiiedand wasfoundtoalterthemobilityofHP1, suchthatrelaxedcondensationwas associatedwithincreasedHP1mobility.
Asdiscussedbytheauthorsofboth studies,severalimportantconclusions canbedrawn.Instrikingcontrastto previousmodels,HP1appearstobea verymobilemolecule.Theformation ofheterochromatinappearsnottobe basedonastableoligomericnetwork ofHP1molecules.Furthermore, heterochromatinisaccessible.There isnoobviousconstraintshielding thesetranscriptionallyinactive compartmentsfromfactorsresiding outside.Giventherapidexchangeof HP1inheterochromaticclusters,any othersolublenuclearprotein,suchas atranscriptionfactor,shouldbeable togainaccess,competewithsilencing factors,andpotentiallyactivategenes locatedwithinheterochromatin.Taken together,heterochromatinappearsto beasurprisinglydynamiccompartment eventhoughitformsmorphologically stableentities.Thisdynamicsituation couldimplythatheterochromatic silencingisnotjustaswitch,butrather acontinuousandactiveprocess.
Althoughthenewworksuggeststhat heterochromatinismoredynamicthan wasthought,somecaveatsremain.It isstillpossiblethatastable“mark’’ ofheterochromatindoesexist.AsI discussedabove,thismarkmightbean
JournalClub
HeterochromatinDynamics
TobiasStraub
Abbreviations:FRAP,luorescencerecoveryafter photobleaching;GFP,greenluorescentprotein; HP1,heterochromatinprotein1
TobiasStraubisapostdoctoralresearchfellowinthe laboratoryofPeterB.BeckerattheAdolf-Butenandt InstituteoftheLudwig-MaximiliansUniversityin Munich,Germany.E-mail:[email protected]. uni-muenchen.de
DOI:10.1371/journal.pbio.0000014 JournalClubisaforumforpostdoctoralscientists
Volume1|Issue1|Page024
PLoSBiology|http://biology.plosjournals.org PLoSBiology|http://biology.plosjournals.org Volume1|Issue1|Page025
undetectedfractionofimmobileHP1 molecules.Inaddition,onecannot excludethatHP1isadownstream factorthatisdynamicallytetheredto astablebindingsite,themostlikely candidatebeingthemethylated histonetail.PerhapstheroleofHP1in heterochromaticsilencinghassimply beenoverinterpreted.Theformation offacultativeheterochromatinbyX inactivationinmammals,forexample, doesnotinvolveHP1eventhough appropriatehistonemethylation marksareset.Thisindicatesthat heterochromatinformationdoes notalwaysfollowthesamerules andsuggeststhatourdeinitionsof heterochromatinmustbereined. Inanycase,itcouldwellbethata silentstateismarkedbysignalsthat haveaslowturnover.Infact,histone methylationisbelievedtogeneratea quitestable“code’’(JenuweinandAllis 2001).Untilthishypothesishasbeen testedinvivo,weshouldkeepanopen mindaboutthestabilityanddynamics ofnuclearstructure.
Severalothernuclearcompartments (spliceosomes,nucleoli)havealso beenproposedtoconsistofdynamic collectionsofcomponents(Misteli 2001).Personally,Iamintriguedbythe factthatheterochromatinalsomight functionasasteady-stateassociationof molecules.Istheentirenucleus,the genomeorganization—irrespective ofitsfunctionalstate—inconstant lux?Ofcourse,suchasituationwould provideanappealingexplanation fortheplasticityofgeneexpression. Ontheotherhand,dynamiccontrol ofgeneexpressioncomplicates explanationsofhowestablished expressionpatternsarestablyinherited. Sofar,geneticknockoutexperiments havebeenthemostpowerfultoolsto unravelthemechanismsofepigenetic regulation.Unfortunately,manyof thoseinvestigationscanonlyprovide insightintotheestablishmentof expressionproiles.Whathappensif
regulatoryfactorsareknockeddown afterexpressionpatternsaresetup? Whichsignalswillbeerasedandwhich oneswillpersist?Iamworkingonthe mechanismofdosagecompensation inDrosophila(Lucchesi1998).This processinvolvesstablechangesof chromatinstructure,whichleadsto lastingeffectsonX-chromosomalgene expression.Toexaminethegenerality ofthenewresultsonheterochromatin, itwillbeimportanttoindout
whethertheproteinsinvolvedin deiningtheXchromosomeasan epigeneticcompartmenthavethe samedynamicbehaviourasHP1.In addition,systematicknockdownof thesefactorsafterestablishmentof dosagecompensationmightdisclosea hierarchyinepigeneticmaintenance thatisdifferentfromtheoneaffecting establishment.
References
CheutinT,McNairnAJ,JenuweinT,GilbertDM, SinghPB,etal.(2003)Maintenanceofstable heterochromatindomainsbydynamicHP1 binding.Science299:721–725.
EissenbergJC,ElginSC(2000)TheHP1protein family:Gettingagriponchromatin.CurrOpin GenetDev10:204–210.
FestensteinR,PagakisSN,HiragamiK,Lyon D,VerreaultA,etal.(2003)Modulationof heterochromatinprotein1dynamicsinprimary mammaliancells.Science299:719–721. GrewalSI,ElginSC(2002)Heterochromatin:New
possibilitiesfortheinheritanceofstructure. CurrOpinGenetDev12:178–187.
HeitzE(1928)DasHeterochromatinderMoose. JahrbWissBotanik69:762–818.
JenuweinT,AllisCD(2001)Translatingthe histonecode.Science293:1074–1080. KimuraH,CookPR(2001)Kineticsofcore
histonesinlivinghumancells:Littleexchange ofH3andH4andsomerapidexchangeof H2B.JCellBiol153:1341–1353. LucchesiJC(1998)Dosagecompensationin
liesandworms:TheupsanddownsofX-chromosomeregulation.CurrOpinGenetDev 8:179–184.
MisteliT(2001)Proteindynamics:Implications fornucleararchitectureandgeneexpression. Science291:843–847.
SinghPB,GeorgatosSD(2002)HP1:Facts,open questions,andspeculation.JStructBiol140: 10–16.
DOI:10.1371/journal.pbio.0000014.g001
Figure1.FRAPofHP1–GFPRevealsaDynamicAssociationwithHeterochromatin