• Nenhum resultado encontrado

Rev. paul. pediatr. vol.33 número4

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2018

Share "Rev. paul. pediatr. vol.33 número4"

Copied!
8
0
0

Texto

(1)

www.rpped.com.br

REVISTA

PAULISTA

DE

PEDIATRIA

ORIGINAL

ARTICLE

Changes

in

physical

fitness

and

nutritional

status

of

schoolchildren

in

a

period

of

30

years

(1980---2010)

Gerson

Luis

de

Moraes

Ferrari

a,b,

,

Victor

Keihan

Rodrigues

Matsudo

a

,

Mauro

Fisberg

b

aCentrodeEstudosdoLaboratóriodeAptidãoFísicadeSãoCaetanodoSul(CELAFISCS),SãoCaetanodoSul,SP,Brazil

bAdolescentMedicineSection(CentrodeAtendimentoeApoioaoAdolescente---CAAA)oftheDepartmentofPediatrics,

UniversidadeFederaldeSãoPaulo---EscolaPaulistadeMedicina(Unifesp/EPM),SãoPaulo,SP,Brazil

Received16December2014;accepted27March2015 Availableonline28August2015

KEYWORDS

Child;

Physicalfitness; Nutritionalstatus

Abstract

Objective: Toanalyzeandcomparethechangesinphysicalfitnessaccordingtothenutritional statusandgenderofschoolchildrenduringaperiodof30years(1980---2010).

Methods: Four cross-sectionalevaluationswere performedevery 10years inaperiod of30 yearsfrom1978to1980(baseline),1988---1990(10years),1998---2000(20years)and2008---2010 (30years).Thesampleconsistedof1291schoolchildren(188inbaseline,307in10years;375in 20years;421in30years)of10and11yearsold.Thevariablesassessedwere:bodyweight(kg), height(cm),upperlimbstrength(ULS;kg),lowerlimbstrength(LLS;cm),agility(seconds)and velocity(seconds).Schoolchildrenwereclassifiedasnormalweightandoverweightaccording toWorldHealthOrganizationreference ofbodymassindexforageandgender.Comparisons amongperiodsappliedANOVAfollowedbyBonferronitest,withasignificancelevelsetatof

p<0.01.Variationbetweenbaselineand30yearswasassessedbythepercentagedelta.Seven differentpercentilevalueswerepresentedforeachvariable.

Results: In eutrophic boys and girls, mean values ofULS (−16.7%;−3.2%), agility (−1.5%;

−1.6%)decreasedsignificantlyafter30years(p<0.001).Intheoverweightboysandgirls,only theaverageULS(−15.5%;−12.5%)decreasedsignificantlyovertime(p<0.001).After30years, theULSpercentilechangedinboys.

Conclusions: Thedeclineinphysicalfitnesswasgreaterinschoolchildrenwithnormalweight thaninthosewithoverweight.

©2015SociedadedePediatriadeS˜aoPaulo.PublishedbyElsevierEditoraLtda.Thisisanopen accessarticleundertheCCBY-license(https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

DOIoforiginalarticle:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rpped.2015.03.008

Correspondingauthor.

E-mail:gersonferrari08@yahoo.com.br(G.L.M.Ferrari).

2359-3482/©2015SociedadedePediatriadeS˜aoPaulo.PublishedbyElsevierEditoraLtda.ThisisanopenaccessarticleundertheCC

(2)

PALAVRAS-CHAVE

Crianc¸a; Aptidãofísica; Estadonutricional

Modificac¸õesdaaptidãofísicaeestadonutricionaldeescolaresemumperíodode30 anos(1980---2010)

Resumo

Objetivo: Analisarecompararasmudanc¸asdaaptidãofísicadeacordocomoestadonutricional esexodeescolaresdurante30anos(1980---2010).

Métodos: Quatroavaliac¸õestransversaisforamfeitasacada10anosem30anos:1978---1980 (linhadebase),1988---1990(10anos),1998---2000(20anos)e2008---2010(30anos).Aamostra consistiude1.291escolares(188nalinhadebase;307em10anos;375em20anos;421em30 anos)de10e11anos.Foramanalisados:pesocorporal(kg),estatura(cm),forc¸ademembros superiores(FMS;kg)einferiores(FMI;cm),agilidade(segundos)evelocidade(segundos).Os escolaresforamclassificadoscomoeutróficoseexcessodepesomedianteascurvaspropostas pelaOrganizac¸ãoMundialdaSaúdedeíndicedemassacorporal.FoiusadoAnovaseguidapelo métododeBonferroniparacompararosperíodoseadotadop<0,01.Variac¸ãoentrealinhade basee30anosfoiavaliadapelodeltapercentual.Foramapresentadossetedistintosvaloresde percentisparacadavariávelanalisada.

Resultados: Nos meninose nasmeninas eutróficos,as médiasdos valores daFMS (−16,7%;

−3,2%)eagilidade(−1,5%;−1,6%)diminuíramsignificativamenteem30anos(p<0,001).Nos meninosenasmeninascomexcessodepeso,somenteasmédias daFMS(−15,5%;−12,5%) diminuíramsignificativamente(p<0,001). Após30 anos,osvalores dospercentisdaFMSdos meninosapresentaramdiminuic¸ão.

Conclusões: Em30anos,odeclíniodaaptidãofísicafoimaiornosescolareseutróficosdoque naquelescomexcessodepeso.

©2015SociedadedePediatriadeS˜aoPaulo.PublicadoporElsevierEditoraLtda.Esteéumartigo OpenAccesssobalicençaCCBY(https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.pt).

Introduction

Physical fitness can be represented by several variables, andamongthemarebodycompositionmeasurements(body weightand bodymass index --- BMI), aswell as neuromo-tor (muscle strength, agility and velocity) and metabolic variables(cardiorespiratoryfitness).1,2If,ontheonehand, theprevalenceofoverweightschoolchildrenhasincreased alarmingly worldwide,3 onthe other hand, some physical fitnessvariables --- for instance, muscle strength and car-diorespiratoryfitness--- havedecreased in recent yearsin severalcountries.4,5 Somestudieshaveshownthatmuscle strengthandcardiorespiratoryfitness arenegatively asso-ciatedwithriskfactorsforcardiovasculardisease(CVD).6---8 Forinstance, overweightschoolchildren withlow physical fitnesshaveahigherriskof developingcardiovascular dis-eases,suchasobesity,diabetesandarterialhypertension.6,8 AccordingtoTomkinson,9 studiesanalyzing physical fit-ness variables over the years, available in developing countries,donotallowfirmconclusionstobedrawnabout themagnitudeofpossibletrends,andtemporalstudiescan provideinformationonhealthindicators(suchasoverweight andphysicalfitnessvariables),aswellasanunderstanding ofsocial,economicandculturalchangesofagivenregion. Ofallthestudiesthatanalyzedthebehaviorofphysical fit-nessvariablesovertheyearsinBrazil,onlythreeconsidered the body size,10---12 asoverweight or obese schoolchildren havelowerlevelsofphysicalfitnesswhencomparedtothose withnormalweight.13 Werecentlyshowedagreater reduc-tionincardiorespiratoryfitnessinschoolchildrenclassified ashavingnormalweight(25.8%)thaninthoseclassifiedas

overweight(16.2%)ina30-yearperiod.10Forthisreason,it issuggestedthatthelevelsofphysicalfitnessvariablesmay have decreasedinrecentyearsat differentmagnitudes in schoolchildren withdifferent nutritionalstatuses.14 There hasbeennostudyintheliteraturethatassessedchangesin physical fitnessvariablesinvolving musclestrength,agility andvelocityinschoolchildrenofdifferentbodysizesovera 30-yearperiod.

Inthisstudy,thehypothesisisthatthedecreasein phys-icalfitnessvariables(upperandlower-limbstrength,agility andvelocity),analyzedduringa30-yearperiod,isoccurring inboth schoolchildrenwithnormalweightandoverweight ones. Therefore,theaimof thestudywastoanalyzeand comparethechangesinphysicalfitnessvariablesaccording tothenutritionalstatusandgender inschoolchildrenover a30-yearperiod(1980---2010).

Method

(3)

haveundergoneacompletephysicalexaminationinoneof theanalyzed periods;tobebetween 10and11yearsold; with noclinical or functional limitations; to be classified asprepubertal,andparents/guardianssigningtheinformed consentform)werepublishedpreviously.10Todeterminethe biologicalmaturationstage,theself-assessmenttechnique ofsecondarysexualcharacteristicsaccordingtogenderwas used,whichhadalreadybeenvalidated(from0.60to0.71) for theIlhabela Projectitself.2 The project wasapproved by theInstitutional Review Boardof UniversidadeFederal deSãoPaulo(protocoln.0056/10).

Adatabasecontainingphysicalassessmentsfrom1978to 2011 was analyzed, consisting of 1291 students (Table 1) aged 10 and 11 years who participated in the study. Schoolchildren inthis agegroup wereselected ineach of thefourperiodswithcross-sectionalanalyses, carriedout every10yearsandoveraperiodof30years,from1978to 1980(baseline),1988---1990(10years),1998---2000(20years) and2008---2010(30years).

Allvariablesincludedinthisstudywereevaluatedinthe fourperiods,accordingtotheCELAFISCSstandardization.2 Of the anthropometric variables, body weight and height were measured.2 Three consecutive measurements were obtained,andthearithmeticmeanwasusedforthe analy-sis.BMI(kg/m2)wasusedfortheclassificationofnutritional

status.Tomeettheobjectiveofthepresentstudy,children wereclassifiedintotwogroups:normalweight,whenthez -scorewasbetween−2and1,andoverweight,whenzscore was>1,accordingtotheBMIcurvesproposedbytheWorld Health Organization (WHO).15 Schoolchildren withz-score <−2wereexcludedfromthestudy.

Physical fitness variables that were analyzed included upper (ULS) and lower-limb strength (LLS), agility and velocity.2 ULS was measured by a handgripdynamometer (Takei TK005, Tokyo, Japan) in kg. The students gripped thedynamometerwiththegreatestpossiblestrengthwith therighthand,withthearmextendedalongthebody.The bestresultoftwoattempts,performedatleasttwominutes apart,wasconsideredthefinalresult.LLSmeasurementwas obtained bythe verticaljump test without helpfrom the upper limbs, measured in cm. The tests were performed threetimes,andthebestresultwasconsideredforthe anal-ysis.Agilitywasmeasuredbytheshuttleruntest,andthe bestresult of twoattempts wasconsidered. Velocity was

evaluatedusingthe50-mruntestinasingleattempt.Before eachtest,thetestobjectivesandprocedureswerebriefly explainedtofacilitatetheirunderstandingbythe schoolchil-dren.

The reproducibility and objectivity of each test were calculatedina sub-sampleof 40studentsin each evalua-tion.Thereproducibilityvaluesrangedfrom0.95to0.97for bodyweight,0.97---0.99forheight,0.74to0.77for upper-limb strength, from0.77 to0.81 for lower-limb strength, from0.76 to 0.79 for agility, and 0.77 to 0.81 for veloc-ity.Regardingtheobjectivity,thevalueswere0.94---0.98for bodyweight,0.96to0.99forheight,0.75to0.79for upper-limbstrength,0.78to0.82forlower-limbstrength,0.77to 0.80foragility,and0.79to0.83forvelocity.

Data distribution was analyzed using the Kolmogorov---Smirnovtest,andthevariableswereexpressed as mean and standard deviation for numerical variables. The variationbetween baselineand 30 years wascarried out using the delta percentage (%). The comparison of thefourassessmentswasperformedbyanalysisofvariance (ANOVA) with three factors (gender, nutritional status anddecade), followed by Bonferroni multiple comparison test.16Sevendifferentpercentilevalues(5,10,25,50,75, 90and95) werecalculated for each decade,analyzed by genderforeachofthevariablesanalyzed.Thecalculations were performed using the Statistical Package for the SocialSciencessoftware(SPSS)version18.0,andstatistical significancewassetatp<0.01.16

Results

The proportionof male schoolchildrenclassified by nutri-tionalstatusaccordingtothedecadewas:1978---1980:27.2% normal weight and 22.3% overweight; 1988---1990: 35.8% normal weight and 20.5% overweight; 1998---2000: 41.6% normalweightand14.9%overweight;2008---2010:43.8% nor-mal weight and 15.2% overweight. The number of male schoolchildren withnormal weight washigher than those withoverweightinallevaluations.Asforfemales,the pro-portionwas:1978---1980,baseline:22.8%withnormalweight and27.7%overweight;1988---1990:20.2%withnormalweight and23.5%overweight;1998---2000:24.6%normalweightand 18.9% overweight; 2008---2010: 21.6% normal weight and

Table1 DescriptiveanalysisofanthropometricvariablesofschoolchildrenfromIlhabelaovera30-yearperiod.

1978---1980 1988---1990 1998---2000 2008---2010

Gendera

Male 93(49.5) 173(56.3) 212(56.5) 248(58.9)

Female 95(50.5) 134(43.7) 163(43.5) 173(41.1)

Nutritionalstatusa

Normalweight 94(50.0) 172(56.0) 248(66.2) 275(65.4)

Excessweight 94(50.0) 135(44.0) 127(33.8) 146(34.6)

Bodyweight(kg)b 36.22±8.30 35.47±8.03 36.24±8.34 35.90±7.46

Height(cm)b 142.83±7.98 141.20±8.71 142.65±7.55 143.06±7.83

BMI(kg/m2)b 17.56±2.2 17.61±2.7 17.65±2.2 17.41±2.1

BMI,bodymassindex.

(4)

19.4% overweight. The number of female schoolchildren withnormalweightwashigheronlyinthe 20and30-year evaluations.10 Table1shows the characterization(gender, nutritionalstatusandanthropometry)ofthesample accord-ingtothefourevaluationperiods.

In boyswithnormal weight,meanupper-limb strength valuesdecreasedsignificantlyafter30years.Asforagility, theaveragemeanswhencomparingthe2008---2010andthe 1978---1980periodsincreased.Therewerenosignificant dif-ferencesbetweentheperiodsregardinglower-limbstrength and velocity (Table 2). In overweight boys, upper-limb strengthshowedastatisticallyhighermeanin1978---1980, whencomparedwith2008---2010.Therewerenosignificant

differences between theevaluation periods of lower-limb strength,agilityandvelocity(Table2).

In normal weight girls, upper-limb strength showed higher means when comparing the 1998---2000 and the 2008---2010 periods. The means of agility times increased whencomparing2008---2010vs.1978---1980.Bothlower-limb strength and velocity did not differ between evaluation periods (Table 2). In overweight girls, only the mean upper-limb strength decreased statistically when compar-ingtheperiods1988---1990vs.2008---2010and1998---2000vs. 2008---2010(Table2).

Regarding upper-limb strength, overweight boys had a better performance than the ones with normal weight in

Table2 Comparisonofphysicalfitnessvariablesaccordingtogenderandnutritional statusofschoolchildrenfromIlhabela overa30-yearperiod.

1978---1980 1988---1990 1998---2000 2008---2010 pa %b

Normalweight Gender

Male n=51 n=110 n=156 n=184

Female n=43 n=62 n=92 n=91

ULS(kg)

Male 21.50±6.92c 19.02±4.25c 18.06±4.55c 17.92±3.65 <0.001 16.7 Female 18.74±4.88 18.72±4.05 16.18±3.60c,d 18.16

±4.12 <0.001 −3.2

LLS(cm)

Male 24.60±4.64 24.55±4.82 24.47±4.99 22.38±5.92 0.40 −9.0

Female 24.41±3.86 24.41±4.41 23.51±4.76 22.02±4.89 0.47 −9.8

Agility(seconds)

Male 12.54±1.28c 12.66±1.19 12.69±1.01 12.73±1.07 <0.001 1.5

Female 13.51±1.27c,d 13.71±1.17d 12.93±0.84d 13.72±1.60d <0.001 1.6

Velocity(seconds)

Male 9.49±0.73 9.70±0.83 9.88±0.86 10.10±2.37 0.04 −6.4

Female 9.59±0.66 10.36±0.87d 10.36±0.72 10.32±0.83 0.89 7.0

Excessweight Gender

Male n=42 n=63 n=56 n=64

Female n=52 n=72 n=71 n=82

ULS(kg)

Male 23.75±6.18c 20.83±4.24e 18.69±5.20e 20.07±4.33e <0.001 15.5 Female 22.60±5.17 20.56±4.96c,e 15.73±3.86c,d,e 20.08±4.35e <0.001 12.5

LLS(cm)

Male 22.31±4.62 24.10±6.04 22.60±5.90 24.58±4.75 0.27 10.2

Female 24.75±5.44 23.09±4.58 21.32±4.32 23.10±5.42 0.14 −6.7

Agility(seconds)

Male 13.15±1.02 13.04±1.14 12.82±1.00 13.06±0.89 0.54 0.7

Female 13.86±1.40d 13.83±1.24d 13.13±1.05 13.66±0.97 0.04 1.4

Velocity(seconds)

Male 10.00±0.68 10.05±0.98 10.53±1.20e 10.43±1.00 0.13 4.3

Female 10.10±0.40 10.60±0.82 11.06±1.14e 10.92±1.08 0.17 7.5

ULS,upper-limbstrength;LLS,lower-limbstrength;datadescribedasmean±standarddeviation.

aANOVAwiththreefactors(gender,nutritionalstatusanddecade). b

%(deltapercentile):variationbetweenthebaselineand30years.

c p<0.01:forcomparisonbetweenbaseline,10,20,and30years. d p<0.01:forcomparisonbetweenboysandgirls.

(5)

theperiods 1988---1990, 1998---2000 and2008---2010. As for velocity,boyswithnormalweighthadasignificantlybetter performance thanoverweight ones only in the1998---2000 periods. Normal-weight and overweight boys had similar resultsregardinglower-limbstrengthandagilityinall ana-lyzedperiods(Table2).

Overweight girls had a better performance regarding upper-limbstrength,whencomparedtonormalweightones, inthe1988---1990,1998---2000and2008---2010periods.Asfor velocity,normalweightgirlshadasignificantlybetter per-formancethanoverweightonesonlyinthe1998---2000period (Table2).

In terms ofcomparisonbetween thegenders regarding upper-limb strength, normal weight and overweight girls performed worse than normal-weight and overweight boys only in the period of 1998---2000. Regarding agility,

normal-weight girls performed worse than normal-weight boysinallevaluatedperiods.When overweightgirlswere comparedtooverweightboys,thedifferencebetweenthe meansoccurredonlyinthe1978---1980 andthe1988---1990 periods. Regarding the lower-limb strength and velocity means,therewasnostatisticaldifferencebetweenthe gen-ders(Table2).

Regardlessofthenutritionalstatus,Figs.1(males)and2 (females) illustrate the percentile values for each physi-calfitnessvariable andtheir respectivechanges over the years.Inmales,themeanvaluesofthepercentiles(50,75, 90 and95) of upper-limb strength decreased significantly whencomparing1978---1980with1988---1990,1998---2000and 2008---2010(Fig.1).Infemales,therewerenosignificant dif-ferencesinpercentilesbetweentheassessmentperiodsfor allanalyzedvariables(Fig.2).

60 160

155

150

145

140

135

130

125

0 1978-1980

1998-2000 2008-2010 1988-1990 55

50

45

40

Body weight (kg)

Height (cm)

35

30

25

0

25 33

28

23

18

13

0

0

5 10 25 50 75 90 95

11 12 13 14 15 16 23

21

19

18

BMI (kg/m

)

2

ULS (kg)

15

0

33

30

27

24

21

LLS (cm)

18

0

16

14

12

10

8

Velocity (seconds)

Agility (seconds)

Percentiles

0

5 10 25 50 75

Percentiles

95 90

(6)

60

160 155

150 145

140 135

130 125

0 1978-1980

2008-2010 1998-2000

1988-1990 55

50

45

40

Body weight (kg)

Height (cm)

35

30

25

0

25 30

25

20

15

10

0

0

5 10 25 50 75 90 95

10

8 12 14 16 18 23

21

19

17

BMI (kg/m

)

2

ULS (kg)

15

0

33

30

27

24

21

LLS (cm)

18

0

16

14

12

10

8

Velocity (seconds)

Agility (seconds)

Percentis

0

5 10 25 50 75

Percentiles

95 90

Figure2 Percentilevaluesforeachphysicalfitnessvariableregardlessofnutritionalstatusovera30-year-periodinfemales. ULS,upper-limbstrength;LLS,lower-limbstrength.

Discussion

In normal children of both genders, there was a signifi-cantdecreaseinthemeanupper-limbstrengthandagility time. In overweight children of both genders, there was asignificant decreaseonly inupper-limb strengthover 30 years. These results seem to indicate that physical fit-nessindicatorsofschoolchildrenfromIlhabelaworsenedin recentyears,althoughtherewasnoevidenceofanincrease in childhood obesity in this specific population over the years,unlikethenutritionalchange, frommalnutrition to overweight,whichhasaffectedtheBrazilianpopulationin the same periodduring which ourdata were collected.17 Although Ilhabela has shown remarkable economic devel-opmentinrecent decades,withan increase inpopulation and urbanization rates, it is important to note that the

nutritionalstatusremainedunchangedamongthechildren studiedinthisagegroup.Therefore,itseemsprobablethat theschoolchildrenobservedinthisstudydidnotfollowthe nutritiontransitionprofileofBrazilianschoolchildreninthe samestudiedperiod.TheHouseholdBudgetSurvey17showed amorethanthree-foldincrease,from9.8%to33.4%,inthe proportionofBrazilianchildrenwithexcessweightbetween 1975and2009.

(7)

et al.20 analyzed schoolchildren in the United States and observed worse physical fitness results in obese children thaninthenormalweightonesinrunningtests.Inboth gen-ders,ourresultsdidnotfindchangesinlower-limbstrength andagility,when comparingnormal-weightschoolchildren withoverweightones.Forinstance,Dollmanetal.18found an increasein the50-meter runningtimeof 0.1---0.2% per yearfor12years.Ourresultsfoundareductioninvelocity of0.24%and0.20%peryearinnormalweightandoverweight schoolchildren,respectively.

Changes in physical fitness over the years have been attributedlargelytochangesinphysicalactivity.21 Astudy carriedoutbyArteroetal.22indicatedthatoverweight chil-drencanperformphysicalfitnesstestsaswellorevenbetter thanthosewithnormalweight,andinthisstudythistrend wasfoundintheupper-limbstrengthtest,especiallyamong boys.

Other results showed that schoolchildren with better physicalfitnessarelesslikelytobeoverweightthanthose withpoorerphysicalfitnessperformance.13,23 Forinstance, Shangetal.23disclosedthatoverweightchildrenhadaworse physical fitness performance when compared to normal-weight ones. These results are comparable tothose of a cross-sectionalstudycarriedoutwithadolescentsfromthe Republic of Seychelles by Bovet et al.,13 which reported an inverse association between physical fitness and body weight.

Overweight schoolchildren are more sedentary and perform less moderate-to-vigorous physical activity than normal-weight ones.24 A systematic review established a highcorrelationbetweenlackofphysicalactivityand unfa-vorablebodycompositionandlow physicalfitness.All232 reviewedstudiesassociateda sedentarylifestylewithrisk factorsforCVDandincreasedhealthrisks.25

According to the model established by Tomkinson and Olds,5 factorsassociated withsecular changesarecaused by a set of social, behavioral, physical, psychosocial and physiological factors. These patternscan beexplainedby highercalorieintakeratesandreducedenergyconsumption, associatedwithbetteraccesstotechnology.

Analyzing thedataaccordingtothepercentile,decade afterdecade,therewereconsiderablevariationsand reduc-tionsinphysicalfitnessvalues,especiallyintheupper-limb strengthofschoolchildren.Forinstance,observingthe95th percentile for the male gender, upper-limb strength was 33kgin 1978---1980and 24kg30yearslater. Suchchanges havealsobeenreportedinanotherstudy.26

Regarding gender, the data show that the girls had a worseperformancethanboys.Researchcarriedoutoverthe yearsin developed countries(Spain andThe Netherlands) showedresultssimilartothosefoundhere regardingboth physicalfitnessandactivity.27,28

Bodycomposition,physical fitnessandphysicalactivity levels arestrongly associated with cardiovascular disease and mortality.25,29 Therefore, the identification of risk groupsiscrucialforthedevelopmentofintervention strate-gies.Changesinlifestyleandtheregularpracticeofphysical activitythroughparentalinitiativesandsocialsupport inter-ventionsareimportantstrategiestofightagainstchildhood obesity and physical inactivity.30 However,other prospec-tivestudiesareneededtodeterminethecause-and-effect relation between physical activity, physical fitness and

bodyweight,assomeauthorsfoundaninverseassociation betweenbodyweightandphysicalfitness.13

The cross-sectional analyses of thisstudy donot allow ustoestablish acause-and-effect association.The conve-niencesamplemayhaveselectedchildrenwhoweremore interestedinperformingthephysicalfitnesstests,limiting thegeneralizationofresults.Nevertheless,theselimitations donotconcealatrendofdecreasedphysicalfitnessvariables thataffectschoolchildrenindevelopingcountries,andthe resultsmayapplytoBrazilianchildrenwiththesame char-acteristics.However,theymustbeinterpretedwithcaution, eveniftheinternationalliteraturefounddecreasedphysical fitnessvariablesover theyearsinrepresentativesamples, afactthatdiffersfromthecurrentstudy.18,21Ontheother hand,thisisthefirstBrazilianstudytoshowthebehaviorof neuromotorvariablesaccordingtothenutritionalstatusof schoolchildrenovera30-yearperiod.

The present study showed that the physical fitness of schoolchildrenagedbetween10and11years,ofboth gen-ders,showedasignificantreductionovera30-yearperiod. Thedeclinein physicalfitnesspatternswashigherin nor-malweightchildren(upper-limbstrengthandagility)than in overweight ones. This study emphasizes the complex-ityofphysical fitnesspatternsofschoolchildren andtheir developmentovertime,asthenutritionalstatusmayhave a distinct impact on this outcome over the years. Other research strategies should be explored to better explain physical fitness and itsassociation withnutritional status inchildrenovertheyears.

Funding

Fundac¸ão de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP---2010/20749-8),Coordenac¸ãodeAperfeic¸oamento dePessoaldeNívelSuperior(CAPES)andConselhoNacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq ---47.807/2011-8).

Conflicts

of

interest

Theauthorsdeclarenoconflictsofinterest.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Fundac¸ão de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP---2010/20749-8), Coordenac¸ãodeAperfeic¸oamentodePessoaldeNível Supe-rior (CAPES) and Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento CientíficoeTecnológico(CNPq---47.807/2011-8);also,the participants,parentsandguardians;theteachers,principal andadministrative staff of EscolaMunicipal José Antônio Verzegnassi and Escola Municipal Eva Esperanc¸a; and the PrefectureoftheMunicipalityofIlhabela.

References

1.InstituteofMedicine(IOM).Fitnessmeasuresandhealth out-comesinyouth.Washington:InstituteofMedicine(IOM);2012.

(8)

3.World Health Organization. Global status report on non-communicable diseases 2014: attaining the nine global noncommunicable diseases targets; a shared responsibility. Geneva:WHO;2015.

4.CohenDD,VossC,TaylorMJ,DelextratA,OgunleyeAA, Sander-cockGR.Ten-yearsecularchangesinmuscularfitnessinEnglish children.ActaPaediatr.2011;100:175---7.

5.TomkinsonGR, OldsTS.Secular changesinpediatricaerobic fitness test performance: theglobal picture.Med Sport Sci. 2007;50:46---66.

6.Ervin RB, FryarCD, Wang CY, Miller IM, OgdenCL. Strenght and body weightin US childrenand adolescents.Pediatrics. 2014;134:782---9.

7.Gonc¸alvesR,SzmuchrowskiLA,DamascenoVO,deMedeirosML, CoutoBP,LamounierJA.Associationofbodymassindexand aer-obicphysicalfitnesswithcardiovascularriskfactorsinchildren. RevPaulPediatr.2014;32:208---14.

8.Dencker M, Thorsson O, Karlsson MK, Lindén C, Wollmer P, AndersenLB.Aerobicfitnessrelatedtocardiovascularrisk fac-torsinyoungchildren.EurJPediatr.2012;171:705---10.

9.TomkinsonGR.Globalchangesinanaerobicfitnesstest perfor-manceofchildrenandadolescents(1958---2003).ScandJMed SciSports.2007;17:497---507.

10.FerrariGLM,BraccoMM,MatsudoVR,FisbergM. Cardiorespira-toryfitnessandnutritionalstatusofschoolchildren:evolution of30years.JPediatr(RioJ).2013;89:366---73.

11.Ferrari TK, Ferrari GL, Silva Júnior JP, Silva LJ, Oliveira L, MatsudoVK.Modificationsofadiposity inschool-agechildren accordingtonutritionalstatus:a20-yearanalysis.JPediatr(Rio J).2012;88:239---45.

12.FerrariGL,BraccoMM,MatsudoVR,FisbergM.Changesin adi-positylevelsinschoolchildrenaccordingtonutritionalstatus: analysisovera30-yearperiod.RevBrasCineantropom Desem-penhoHum.2013;15:405---16.

13.Bovet P, Auguste R, Burdette H. Strong inverse association between physical fitness and overweight in adolescents: a largeschool-basedsurvey.IntJBehavNutrPhysAct.2007;4: 24.

14.MakK,HoA,LoW,ThomasGN,McNausAM,DayLTJr.Health relatedphysicalfitnessandweightstatusinHongKong adoles-cents.BMCPublicHealth.2010;10:1---5.

15.deOnisM,OnyangoAW,BorghiE,SiyamA,NishidaC,Siekmann J.DevelopmentofaWHOgrowthreferenceforschool-aged chil-drenandadolescents.BullWorldHealthOrgan.2007;85:660.

16.NorusisMJ.SPSSforwindows:advancedstatistics,release6.0. Chicago,IL:SPSSInc.;1993.

17.Pesquisa de Orc¸amentos Familiares, 2008---2009. Antropome-triaeestado nutricionalde crianc¸as,adolescenteseadultos

noBrasil. Riode Janeiro:Instituto Brasileiro de Geografiae Estatística;2010.

18.DollmanJ, OldsT, Norton K, Stuart D.The evolutionof fit-nessand fatness in10-11-year-old Australianschoolchildren: changes in distributional characteristics between 1985 and 1997.PedExercSci.1999;11:108---21.

19.Monyeki MA, Koppes LL, Monyeki KD, Kemper HC, Twisk JW. Longitudinal relationships between nutritional status, body composition, and physical fitness in rural children of SouthAfrica: theellisraslongitudinalstudy.AmJ HumBiol. 2007;19:551---8.

20.KimJ,MustA, Fitzmaurice GM,et al.Relationship of physi-calfitness toprevalenceand incidenceofoverweightamong schoolchildren.ObesRes.2005;13:1246---54.

21.TremblayMS,ShieldsM,LavioletteM,CraigCL,JanssenI, Gor-berSC.FitnessofCanadian childrenand youth: resultsfrom the2007---2009CanadianHealthMeasuresSurvey.HealthRep. 2010;21:7---20.

22.ArteroEG,Espana-RomeroV,OrtegaFB,etal.Health-related fitnessinadolescents:underweight,andnotonlyoverweight,as aninfluencingfactorTheAVENAstudy.ScandJMedSciSports. 2010;20:418---27.

23.ShangX, LiuA, Li Y, etal. Theassociation ofweight status withphysicalfitnessamongChinesechildren.IndianJPediatr. 2010:1---6.

24.HermanKM,SabistonCM,MathieuME,TremblayA,ParadisG. Sedentarybehaviorinacohortof8-to10-year-oldchildrenat elevatedriskofobesity.PrevMed.2014;60:115---20.

25.TremblayMS,LeBlanc AG,KhoME, et al.Systematic review ofsedentary behaviourand health indicatorsin schoolaged children.IntJBehavNutandPhysAct.2011;8:1---22.

26.AlbonHM,HamlinMJ,RossJJ.Seculartrendsanddistributional changesinhealthandfitnessperformancevariablesof 10-14-year-oldchildreninNewZealandbetween1991and2003.BrJ SportsMed.2010;44:263---9.

27.RunhaarJ,CollardDC,SinghAS,KemperHC,VanMechelenW, ChinapawM.MotorfitnessinDutchyouth:differencesover a 26-yearperiod(1980---2006).JSciMedSport.2010;13:323---8.

28.UrdialesDM,RuizJR,OrtegaFB,etal.Seculartrendsin health-relatedphysicalfitnessinSpanishadolescents:theAVENAand HELENAstudies.JSciMedSport.2010;13:584---8.

29.TimpkaS,PeterssonIF,ZhouC,EnglundM.Musclestrengthin adolescentmenandriskofcardiovasculardiseaseeventsand mortalityinmiddleage.BMCMed.2014;12:62.

Imagem

Table 1 Descriptive analysis of anthropometric variables of schoolchildren from Ilhabela over a 30-year period.
Table 2 Comparison of physical fitness variables according to gender and nutritional status of schoolchildren from Ilhabela over a 30-year period.
Figure 1 Percentile values for each physical fitness variable regardless of nutritional status over a 30-year period in males
Figure 2 Percentile values for each physical fitness variable regardless of nutritional status over a 30-year-period in females.

Referências

Documentos relacionados

Sendo bem receptiva, a Diretora administrativa do IPHAEP foi bastante atenciosa e me citou as formas necessárias de procedimento - em contrapartida contei a ela sobre o projeto,

A incorporação de uma lista de verificação na rotina da elaboração dos suportes de informação no Instituto da Segurança Social, IP, bem como noutros

It is important to note that the choice of this scale as a measure was based on an investigation led by Hon et al (2014) that also resorted to this scale and

Also the basic concepts of heart sounds and cardiac auscultation are reviewed; In Chapter 3 the state of the art is presented: a literature review of studies that compare

The present study found that functional training (FT) promoted sig- nificant improvements in balance/agility, lower limb strength, upper limb strength, cardiorespiratory fitness

Para os níveis de proteínas totais o valores encontrados no presente estudo foram inferiores aos propostos em outros estudos com matrinxã de cativeiro o qual naquele

materiais diversificados de apoio à aprendizagem da leitura (listas, abecedários, dicionários ilustrados...), devendo ser realizadas actividades de informação nesses

Os primeiros elementos, publicados em 2000, colocaram 48% dos jovens portugueses nos patamares inferiores (1 ou 2) de uma escala de cinco níveis. Também os resultados das provas