© 2014 Sociedade Brasileira de Hemodinâmica e Cardiologia Intervencionista. Published by Elsevier Editora Ltda. All rights reserved.
Performance of the Titanium-Nitride-Oxide Coated Stent
in Patients with Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease
Thomas Edison Cintra Osterne
1, Wilson Albino Pimentel Filho
1, Fernando Augusto Molinori di
Castro Curado
1, Edson Alcides Bocchi
2, Wellington Borges Custódio
1, Gustavo Mello Gomes de Matos
1,
Pedro Henrique Luiggi Teixeira
1, Marcos Venício Martins Gori
1, Waigner Bento Pupin Filho
1,
Gustavo Vinicius Lambert Olivotti
1, Jorge Roberto Büchler
1, Stoessel Figueiredo de Assis
1ABSTRACT
Background: To date, there are no studies evaluating the use of the titanium-nitride-oxide coated stent in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease. We have compared the
performance of the Titan-2
stent to that of the second
gen-eration drug-eluting stents in this scenario. Methods: From
2011 to 2012, 284 patients were treated with the Titan-2
stent, of which 100 (35.2%) had multivessel coronary artery disease. This group was compared to 100 patients, of a group of 304 (38.9%) patients with multivessel coronary artery dis-ease treated with second generation drug-eluting stents with durable or biodegradable polymers. The primary endpoint was the occurrence of major adverse cardiovascular events at 1
year. Results: Clinical, angiographic and procedure-related
characteristics of the patients did not show differences between groups. Most patients in the Titan-2
group were male (70%),
mean age was 68.4 ± 12.9 years and 25% were diabetic.
Stable symptomatic patients were prevalent (68%), 51% had three-vessel disease and ventricular function was preserved (55.6 ± 12.7%). The incidence of major adverse cardiovascular
events at 1 year in the Titan-2
group was 21% (vs. 17%; p
= 0.59), death was observed in 3% (vs. 2%; p > 0.99) of the patients, acute myocardial infarction in 5% (vs. 4%; p > 0.99)
and a new revascularization procedure in 13% (vs. 11%; p =
0.83). Deinitive stent thrombosis was not observed in either group. Conclusions: The Titan-2 stent showed similar results to those of the second-generation drug-eluting stents, which makes it attractive for use in the complex scenario of patients with multivessel coronary artery disease.
DESCRIPTORS: Percutaneous coronary intervention. Stents. Coated materials, biocompatible. Titanium.
1 Hospital Beneicência Portuguesa de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil. 2 Hospital Samaritano Campinas, Campinas, SP, Brazil.
Correspondence to: Wilson Albino Pimentel Filho. Hospital Benei-cência Portuguesa de São Paulo − Rua Maestro Cardim, 769 − Bela Vista − CEP: 01323-900 − São Paulo, SP, Brazil
E-mail: wilpm@uol.com.br
Received: 02/02/2014 • Accepted: 05/22/2014
RESUMO
Desempenho do Stent Recoberto por Titânio-Óxido Nítrico em Pacientes com Doença Coronária
Multiarterial
Introdução: Até o momento, nenhum estudo avaliou o stent recoberto por titânio-óxido nítrico em pacientes com doença arterial coronariana multiarterial. Comparamos o desempenho do stent Titan-2
ao stents farmacológicos de segunda
ge-ração nesse cenário. Métodos: No período de 2011 a 2012,
284 pacientes foram tratados com o stent Titan-2, dos quais
100 (35,2%) eram portadores de doença arterial coronariana multiarterial. Esse grupo foi comparado a 100 pacientes, de um grupo de 304 (38,9%), com doença arterial coronariana multiarterial, tratados com o stent farmacológico de segunda geração com polímeros duráveis ou biodegradáveis. O desfecho primário foi a ocorrência de eventos cardíacos adversos maiores em 1 ano. Resultados: Características clínicas, angiográicas e do procedimento não apresentaram diferenças entre os grupos.
A maioria dos pacientes do grupo Titan-2
era do sexo
mas-culino (70%), com idade de 68,4 ± 12,9 anos e 25% eram
diabéticos. Predominaram os quadros clínicos estáveis (68%), 51% tinham acometimento triarterial e a função ventricular estava preservada. A incidência de eventos cardiovasculares
adversos maiores em 1 ano no grupo Titan-2
foi de 21% (vs. 17%; p = 0,59), óbito ocorreu em 3% (vs. 2%; p > 0,99) dos
pacientes, infarto do miocárdio em 5% (vs. 4%; p > 0,99)
e nova revascularização miocárdica em 13% (vs. 11%; p =
0,83). Não foram constatadas tromboses de stent deinitivas
em nenhum grupo. Conclusões: O uso do Titan-2
apresentou resultados similares aos do stent farmacológico de segunda geração, o que o torna atrativo para ser utilizado no com-plexo cenário de pacientes portadores de doença arterial coronariana multiarterial.
DESCRITORES: Intervenção coronária percutânea. Stents. Materiais revestidos biocompatíveis. Titânio.
C
oronary stent implantation has become the stand-ard percutaneous coronary intervention, with a safer approach and better results than those ob-tained with balloon angioplasty.1,2 However, coronaryrestenosis, although reduced, still remains as a limita-tion of the procedure, resulting in the need for new procedures and increased costs.3 Drug-eluting stents
(DES) have signiicantly reduced late luminal loss and angiographic restenosis, as well as the need for repeat revascularization, when compared to bare metal stents (BMS).4 This reduction has been signiicant in several
clinical and anatomical scenarios,5-9 especially with
second-generation stents.8
The Titan-2
bioactive stent (Hexacath – Paris, France) is approved for clinical use in Europe, Asia, and North, Central, and South America, including Brazil, with more than 5,000 units already used worldwide.10,11 This stent consists of stainless steel
coated with titanium-nitride-oxide, which has shown
in vitro to reduce platelet aggregation and fibrinogen binding when compared to conventional bare metal stents. Preliminary data have shown similar safety and efficacy profiles of first- and second-generation DES in several clinical scenarios.11-18 However, few studies
have addressed the performance of the Titan-2
in the treatment of patients with multivessel coronary artery disease (CAD).
This study aimed to evaluate the performance of the Titan-2
stent in patients with multivessel CAD and compare it to that of second-generation DES.
METHODS
Patients
From January 2011 to December 2012, 284 pa-tients were treated at Hospital Beneficência Portuguesa de São Paulo with the Titan-2
stent, of whom 100 (35.2%) had multivessel CAD and were selected for this analysis. This study excluded cases whose initial clinical presentation was myocardial infarction with ST-segment elevation, and those who had lesions > 50% in the left main coronary artery or when the percutaneous coronary intervention was performed with saphenous vein grafts. This group was com-pared to 100 patients from a group of 304 (38.9%) patients with multivessel CAD treated with second-generation DES with durable polymers – Endeavor
(Medtronic, Minneapolis, United States) or Xience V
(Abbott Vascular, Santa Clara, United States), and biodegradable polymers – BioMatrix
(Biosensors International, Singapore), in the same period, at the present institution.
The study was conducted in agreement with the Declaration of Helsinki, and all patients signed an informed consent.
The Stents
The Titan-2
balloon-expandable stent combines a stainless steel platform (316 L) of thin struts (0.0040 inch) with open cells and helical connections. It is not coated with polymers or antiproliferative drugs, but rather with a titanium matrix system bound to nitride oxide, applied by vapor deposition on the stent surface. Stents that were used as controls included the En-deavor
, which releases zotarolimus from a biocompatible phosphorylcholine polymer applied to a cobalt-chromium platform of thin struts; the XienceV
, which releases everolimus from a biocompatible luorinated acrylic polymer applied to a platform of cobalt-chromium with thin struts; and the BioMatrix
, which releases biolimus A9 from a biodegradable polylactic acid polymer applied to a stainless steel platform with thin struts.
Procedure
Percutaneous coronary interventions were performed according to current guidelines,19,20 and the inal
strat-egy for the procedure was left to the discretion of the surgeon.
During the procedure, unfractionated heparin was administered at a dose of 70-100 IU/kg, and the use of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors was at the discretion of the surgeon. Pre-dilation was not compulsory, and post-dilation of stents was recommended in case of residual stenosis > 20% by visual estimation. The ad-ministration of dual antiplatelet therapy (acetylsalicylic acid [loading dose 200 mg/100 mg maintenance] and clopidogrel [loading dose 300-600 mg/75 mg mainte-nance]) should be started at least 24 hours before the procedure. In patients with acute coronary syndromes, a loading dose of 600 mg of clopidogrel, 60 mg of prasugrel, or 180 mg of ticagrelor was recommended. After PCI, therapy with aspirin was maintained indei-nitely; clopidogrel, prasugrel (10 mg/day), or ticagrelor (90 mg/day) were maintained for a period of 1 to 3 months for the Titan-2
group, and for at least one year for the DES group.
Outcomes and clinical follow-up
index hospitalization), or twice the upper limit of the normal level after discharge. All new revascularizations, whether percutaneous or surgical, were considered. Deinite stent thrombosis was diagnosed according to the criteria of the Academic Research Consortium.21
Clinical follow-up was performed at 12 months after the procedure, consisting of telephone contact performed according to pre-established institutional protocol.
Statistical Analysis
Categorical variables were described as percentages and compared by the chi-squared or Fisher’s exact test, when appropriate. Continuous variables were described as means and standard deviations and compared us-ing Student’s t-test. p-values < 0.05 were considered statistically signiicant.
RESULTS
The clinical, anatomical, and procedural charac-teristics of the patients are summarized in Table 1, demonstrating no statistically signiicant differences between the groups. Most patients from the Titan-2
group were males (70%), with a mean age of 68.4
± 12.9 years, and 25% were diabetics (4.0% used
insulin). Stable clinical pictures predominated in the clinical presentation (68%), 51% had three-vessel CAD, and ventricular function was preserved (55.6 ± 12.7%).
In patients with three-vessel CAD treated with the titanium-nitride-oxide stent, 135 lesions were treated. Of these, 78% were treated with three or more stents; the remaining cases (22%) were treated with two stents. In patients with two-vessel CAD, 110 lesions were treated; 80% of cases were treated with two or more stents and only one stent was used in the others. In patients with three-vessel CAD treated with drug-eluting stents; 141 lesions were treated, with three or more stents in 77% of cases, and with two stents used in the others. In patients with two-vessel CAD, 115 lesions were treated with two or more stents in 78% of cases, and only one stent was used in the others.
The incidence of MACE at 1 year in the Titan-2
group was 21% (vs. 17%; p = 0.59) and death occurred in 3% (vs. 2%; p > 0.99) of patients, myocardial infarc-tion in 5% (vs. 4%; p > 0.99), and new revascularization procedure in 13% (vs. 11%, p = 0.83), predominantly at the expense of a new PCI in more than three-quarters of the cases (Table 2). No deinite stent thrombosis was observed in either group.
DISCUSSION
In this study, it was demonstrated that clinical out-comes at one year of Titan-2
stent implantation in a clinical and anatomical scenario of greater complexity
(patients with multivessel CAD, of whom approximately 25% were diabetics with predominantly type B2/C le-sions according to the classiication of the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology) were similar to those of the group of patients who received second-generation DES implantation with durable or biodegradable polymers.
Modiications of the stent surface and material prop-erties may have important implications for neointimal hyperplasia after stent implantation. Metallic implants can induce the exchange of electrons and protons, as well as the formation of ion-organic molecular bonds in living tissue. The resulting protein activation, cell toxicity, and stimulation of platelets, monocytes/macro-phages, and ibroblasts may contribute to restenosis.22
Both stainless steel and cobalt-chromium have sig-niicant amounts of nickel, chromium, and molybdenum, which can be released from the stent and induce the aforementioned tissue reactions. The inlammatory and allergic reactions that induce the formation of new tissue around metal alloys containing nickel in patients with orthopedic and dental implants are well known.23 It is
reasonable to assume that stents that contain nickel and other elements can increase neointimal hyperplasia.
Several types of stent coating have been used to create a biologically inert barrier between the metal-lic prosthesis surface and the circulating blood, but none has reduced rates of restenosis, and others, such as gold, increased such rates. An evaluation of ive different biodegradable polymers and three no biode-gradable polymers showed inlammatory reactions with subsequent coronary neointimal thickening, which was not expected based on in vitro tests.24 It is speculated
that this inlammatory process might contribute to coronary restenosis and, eventually, to late thrombosis. Thus, it is necessary to improve the characteristics of the metallic stents, even as a platform for the release of antiproliferative drugs.
Titanium is the material of choice for biomedical implants, especially dental and orthopedic implants, because of its superior biocompatibility and resistance to corrosion. However, the processing of this metal is dificult, and its production costs are prohibitive. In contrast, titanium alloys, such as titanium-nitride oxide, can be more easily used and applied to stain-less steel surfaces through physical vapor deposition at a reasonable cost. Titanium-nitride-oxide surfaces have been experimentally demonstrated to reduce the binding of platelets and ibrinogen in comparison to stainless steel.25 Moreover, neointimal hyperplasia was
reduced by 50% in a porcine model, when compared to a conventional stainless steel stent.26
TABLE 1
Clinical, angiographic, and procedural characteristics
Titanium-nitride-oxide coated stent (n = 100/ 201 vessels/ 245 lesions)
Drug-eluting stent (n = 100/201 vessels/
245 lesions) p-value
Age, years 68.4 ± 12,9 64.5 ± 8.7 0.61
Male gender 70.0 67.0 0.56
Body mass index, Kg/m2 28 ± 4.3 29 ± 4.5 0.11
Current smoking, % 15.0 16 0.93
Arterial hypertension, % 72.0 78.0 0.77
Dyslipidemia, % 75.0 74.0 0.88
Diabetes, % 25.0 26 0.86
Insulin use, % 4.0 5.0 0.88
Previous myocardia linfarction, % 28.0 29.0 0.88 Previous percutaneous coronary intervention, % 2.0 0.0 0.86 Previous coronary artery bypass graft surgery, % 2.0 1.9 0.81
Chronic pulmonary disease, % 10.0 15.0 0.39
Carotid disease, % 10.0 8.0 0.81
Lower-limb peripheral-vascular disease, % 7.0 7.0 > 0.99
Cancer, % 3.0 3.0 > 0.99
Clinical presentation, % 0.17
Stable angina 52.0 53.0
Unstable angina 32.0 35.0
Silent ischemia 16.0 12.0
Left ventricular ejection fraction, % 55.6 ± 12.7 57.5 ± 13.9 0.66
Number of affected vessels, % 0.67
2 49.0 45.0
3 51.0 55.0
Treated vessels,% 0.89
Anterior descending 42.8 46
Right coronary 29.9 33
Circumlex 27.3 21
Type of lesion (American Heart Association/ American College of Cardiology)
0.29
A-B1 29.8 27.0
B2/C 70.2 73.0
Vessel diameter, mm 2.75 ± 0.9 2.85 ± 0.8 0.88
Vessel length 13 ± 3.8 14 ± 3.9 0.89
TABLE 2
Frequency of major adverse cardiovascular events during a one-year period
Titanium-nitride-oxide coated
stent (n = 100) Drug-eluting stent (n = 100) p-value
Death, % 3.0 2.0 > 0.99
Myocardial infarction, % 5.0 4.0 > 0.99
Death or myocardial infarction, % 8.0 6.0 0,78
Target lesion revascularization, % 0.83
Coronary artery bypass graft surgery 4.0 3.0 Percutaneous coronary intervention 9.0 8.0
events.10,25,27 In the case of irst- and second-generation
DES, several studies,11-18 but not all,27,28 demonstrated
that the Titan-2
showed similar beneits to those of DES and did not require prolonged dual antiplatelet therapy (> 1 month for stable patients and > 3 months for those with acute coronary syndromes), as late thrombosis was not observed.17
Study limitations
The results of this study should be interpreted in the context of the following limitations: it was a non-randomized study and, therefore, subject to selection biases; the patient population was too small to detect differences in clinical events of minor importance; clinical information was obtained predominantly by the present team or by telephone contact with the assistant phys-ician, and there was no long-term follow-up (> 1 year).
CONCLUSIONS
This study suggests that the Titan-2
stent has a similar safety and eficacy proile to that of second-generation drug-eluting stents, which makes it attrac-tive for use in the treatment of the complex scenario of patients with multivessel coronary artery disease, particularly when long-term dual antiplatelet therapy is not intended.
CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
The authors declare no conlicts of interest.
FUNDING SOURCE
None.
REFERENCES
1. Fischman DL, Leon MB, Baim DS, Schatz RA, Savage MP, Penn I, et al.; Stent Restenosis Study Investigators. A random-ized comparison of coronary stent placement and balloon angioplasty in treatment of coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med. 1994;331(8):496-501.
2. Serruys P, de Jaegere P, Kiemenneij F, Macaya C, Rutsch W, Heyndrickx G, et al. A comparison of balloon expandable stent implantation with balloon angioplasty in patients with coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med. 1994;331(8):489-95. 3. Peterson ED, Cowper PA, DeLong ER, Zidar JP, Stack RS,
Mark DB. Acute and long-term cost implications of coronary stenting. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1999;33(6):1610-8.
4. Daemen J, Garcia-Garcia HM, Kukreja N, Imani F, de Jaegere PP, Sianos G, et al. The long-term value of sirolimus- and paclitaxel- eluting stents over bare metal stents in patients with diabetes mellitus. Eur Heart J. 2007;28(1):26-32. 5. Stefanini GG, Holmes DR Jr. Drug-eluting coronary-artery
stents. N Engl J Med. 2013;368(3):254-65.
6. Centemero MP, Cherobin JC, De Conti KVF, Ohe LN, Mallmann N, Farkouh ME, et al. Doença arterial coronária e diabetes: do tratamento farmacológico aos procedimentos de revascu-larização. Rev Bras Cardiol Invasiva. 2009;17(3):398-413. 7. Pinheiro LFM, Pimentel Filho WA, Custódio WB, Fioroto WB,
Soares Neto MM. Treatment of acute myocardial infarction
with placement of drug eluting stents. Int J Atheroscler. 2007;2:265-71.
8. Bangalore S, Toklu B, Amoroso N, Fusaro M, Kumar S, Hannan EL, et al. Bare metal stents, durable polymer drug eluting stents, and biodegradable polymer drug eluting stents for coronary artery disease: mixed treatment comparison meta-analysis. BMJ. 2013;347:f6625.
9. Buchanan GL, Chieffo A, Bernelli C, Montonfano M, Carlino M, Latib A, et al. Two-year outcomes following unprotected left main stenting with irst vs. new-generation drug-eluting stents: the FINE registry. Euro Intervention. 2013;9(7):809-16. 10. Sant’Anna FM, Batista LA, Brito MB, Menezes S, Ventura
FM, Buczynski L, et al. Estudo randomizado e comparativo da intervenção coronária percutânea com stents recobertos por titânio-óxido nítrico ou de Aço Inoxidável em pacientes com doença arterial coronária: estudo RIO. Rev Bras Cardiol Invasiva. 2009;17(1):69-75.
11. Angioi M, Barragan P, Cattan S, Collet F, Dupouy P, Durand P, et al. French Ministry of Health prospective multicentre study using bio-active stents coated with titanium nitride oxide: the EVIDENCE registry. Arch Cardiovas Dis. 2012;105(2):60-7. 12. Karjalainen P, Ylitalo A, Juhani Airaksinen KE. Titanium and
nitride oxide coated stents and paclitaxel eluting stents for coronary revascularization in an unselected population. J Invasive Cardiol. 2006;18(10):462-8.
13. Karjalainen P, Ylitalo A, Juhani Airaksinen KE. Real world ex-perience with TITAN
stent: a 9-month follow-up report from the Titan PORI Registry. Euro Intervention. 2006;2(2):187-91. 14. Giraud-Sauveur Y. TITAN 2 Bio-active stent (BAS) with
titanium-NO. Euro Intervention. 2008;3(4):526-8.
15. Karjalainen P. Titan 2 Stent vs. Xience V Stent: 18-month follow-up of the BASE-ACS Randomized Trial [Internet]. [cited 2014 Apr 12]. Available from: http://www.pcronline. com/Lectures/2012
16. Romppanen H, Nammas W, Kervinen K, Mikkelsson J, Pietilä M, Lalmand J, et al. Outcome of ST-elevation myocardial infarction versus non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome treated with titanium-nitride-oxide-coated versus everolimus eluting stents: insights from the BASE-ACS trial. Minerva Cardioangiol. 2013;61(2):201-9.
17. Limacher A, Räber L, Laube E, Lauterburg A, Lötscher S, Hess N, et al. Clinical long-term outcome after implantation of titanium nitride-oxide coated stents compared with paclitaxel- or sirolimus-eluting stents: propensity-score matched analysis. Euro Intervention. 2012;7(9):1043-50.
18. Karjalainen PP, Niemelä M, Airaksinen JK, Rivero-Crespo F, Romppanen H, Sia J, et al. A prospective randomised com-parison of titanium-nitride-oxide-coated bioactive stents with everolimus-eluting stents in acute coronary syndrome: the BASE-ACS trial. Euro Intervention. 2012;8(3):306-15. 19. Gubolino LA, Mangione JA, Silva SS, Queiroga MAC,
Marin-Neto JA. Sociedade Brasileira de Cardiologia. Diretrizes da Sociedade Brasileira de Cardiologia sobre Qualidade Prois-sional e Institucional, Centro de Treinamento e Certiicação Proissional em Hemodinâmica e Cardiologia Intervencionista – III Edição – 2013. Arq Bras Cardiol. 2013;101Supl. 4:1-58. 20. Harold JG, Bass TA, Bashore TM, Brindis RG, Brush JE Jr,
21. Cutlip DE, Windecker S, Mehran R, Boam A, Cohen DJ, van Es GA, et al.; Academic Research Consortiun. Clinical end points in coronary stent trials: a case for standardized deini-tions. Circulation. 2007;115(17):2344-51
22. Mosseri M, Miller H, Tamari I, Plich M, Hasin Y, Brizines M, et al. The Titanium-NO Stent: results of a multicenter registry. EuroIntervention. 2006;2(2):192-6.
23. Steinemann SG. Metal implants and surface reactions. Injury. 1996;27 Suppl 3:SC16-22.
24. van der Giessen WJ, Lincoff AM, Schwartz RS, van Beusekom HM, Serruys PW, Holmes DR, et al. Marked inlammatory sequelae to implantation of biodegradable and non-biode-gradable polymers in porcine coronary arteries. Circulation. 1996;94(7):1690-7.
25. Windecker S, Simon R, Lins M, Klauss V, Eberli FR, Rofi M, et al. Randomized comparison of a titanium-nitride-oxide-coated
stent with a stainless steel stent for coronary revascularization: the TiNOX trial. Circulation. 2005;111(20):2617-22.
26. Windecker S, Mayer I, De Pasquale G, Maier W, Dirsch O, De Groot P, et al. Stent coating with titanium-nitride-oxide for reduction of neointimal hyperplasia. Circulation. 2001;104(8):928-33.
27. Moschovitis A, Simon R, Seidenstücker A, Klauss V, Baylacher M, Lüscher TF, et al. Randomized comparison of titaniumnitride-oxide coated stents with bare metal stents: ive year follow-up of the TiNOX trial. Euro Intervention. 2010;6(1):63-8. 28. López-Mínguez JR, Nogales-Asensio JM, Doncel-Vecino LJ,
