BrazJOtorhinolaryngol.2017;83(1):80---87
www.bjorl.org
Brazilian
Journal
of
OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
ORIGINAL
ARTICLE
Association
of
the
C47T
polymorphism
in
superoxide
dismutase
gene
2
with
noise-induced
hearing
loss:
a
meta-analysis
夽
Jing
Wang
a,b,∗,
Jun
Li
b,c,
Kang
Peng
a,
Zi-Ying
Fu
a,
Jia
Tang
a,
Ming-Jian
Yang
a,
Qi-Cai
Chen
a,∗aCentralChinaNormalUniversity,SchoolofLifeSciencesandHubeiKeyLabofGeneticRegulationandIntegrativeBiology,
Wuhan,China
bDaliUniversity,SchoolofBasicMedicine,Dali,China cDaliUniversity,SchoolofClinicalMedicine,Dali,China
Received28October2015;accepted25January2016 Availableonline19April2016
KEYWORDS
Superoxidedismutase gene2;
Polymorphism; Noise-induced hearingloss; Meta-analysis
Abstract
Introduction:Currently,thereislimitedinformationabouttherelationshipbetweenmanganese superoxidedismutase(sod2)c47tpolymorphismandsusceptibilitytonoise-inducedhearingloss (NIHL).
Objective:The aimofthismeta-analysiswastoclarify theassociationbetweenSOD2 C47T polymorphismandNIHL.
Methods:A search inPubMed and Web ofScience was performedto collect data.All full-text,English-writtenstudiescontainingsufficientandcomplete case-and-controldataabout the relationship betweenSOD2 C47T polymorphismand NIHL wereincluded. Three eligible studies,comprising1094subjects,wereidentified.pooledoddsratios(ORs)and95%confidence intervals(CI)werecalculatedtoevaluatethestrengthoftheassociationbetweenSOD2C47T polymorphismandNIHL.
Results:No significantassociation betweenC47T polymorphismand risk ofNIHL was found withthefollowingcombinations:Tvs.C(OR=0.83;95%CI=0.63---1.09);TTvs.CC(OR=0.49; 95%CI=0.22---1.09);CTvs.CC(OR=0.54; 95%CI=0.25---1.17);TTvs.CC+CT(OR=0.82;95% CI=0.50---1.32);CCvs.TT+TC(OR=0.49;95%CI=0.23---1.04).However,insubgroupanalysis,a significantassociationwasfoundforTTvs.CC+CT(OR=0.77;95%CI=0.42---1.41)intheChinese population.
夽 Pleasecitethisarticleas:WangJ,LiJ,PengK,FuZ-Y,TangJ,YangM-J,etal.AssociationoftheC47Tpolymorphisminsuperoxide
dismutasegene2withnoise-inducedhearingloss:ameta-analysis.BrazJOtorhinolaryngol.2017;83:80---7.
∗Correspondingauthors.
E-mails:wangjing1807@foxmail.com(J.Wang);chenqc@mail.ccnu.edu.cn(Q.Chen).
PeerReviewundertheresponsibilityofAssociac¸ãoBrasileiradeOtorrinolaringologiaeCirurgiaCérvico-Facial.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjorl.2016.01.008
Conclusion: Thepresentmeta-analysissuggeststhatSOD2C47Tpolymorphismissignificantly associatedwithincreasedriskofNIHLintheChinesepopulation.Furtherlargeandwell-designed studiesareneededtoconfirmthisassociation.
© 2016 Publishedby Elsevier Editora Ltda. onbehalf of Associac¸˜ao Brasileira de Otorrino-laringologiaeCirurgiaC´ervico-Facial.ThisisanopenaccessarticleundertheCCBYlicense (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
PALAVRAS-CHAVE
Genedasuperóxido dismutase2; Polimorfismo; Perdaauditiva induzidaporruído; Metanálise
Associac¸ãodopolimorfismoC47Tnogenedasuperóxidodismutase2comperda
auditivainduzidapeloruído:metanálise
Resumo
Introduc¸ão: Atualmente,sãolimitadasasinformac¸õesacercadarelac¸ãoentreopolimorfismo C47T desuperóxidodismutase2(SOD2) dependentedemanganês esuscetibilidadeàperda auditivainduzidapeloruído(PAIR).
Objetivo: Oobjetivodestametanálisefoiesclareceraassociac¸ãoentreopolimorfismoC47T deSOD2ePAIR.
Método: FoirealizadasbuscasnoPubMedeWebofScienceparacoletadedados.Foram incluí-dos todos os estudos noidioma inglês, contendo dados suficientes e completos de casose controlessobrearelac¸ãoentreopolimorfismoC47TdeSOD2ePAIR.Foramidentificadostrês estudos qualificados, abrangendo 1.094 indivíduos.Foramcalculadas as razõesdaschances (oddsratio,OR)acumuladaseintervalosdeconfianc¸a(IC) de95%paraquefosseavaliadaa potênciadaassociac¸ãoentreopolimorfismoC47TdeSOD2ePAIR.
Resultados: Nãofoiencontradaumaassociac¸ãosignificativaentreopolimorfismoC47TdeSOD2 eriscodePAIRcomasseguintescombinac¸ões:Tvs.C(OR=0,83,IC95%=0,63-1,09);TTvs.CC (OR=0,49,IC95%=0,22-1,09);CTvs.CC(OR=0,54,IC95%=0,25-1,17);TTvs.CC+CT(OR= 0,82,IC95%=0,50-1,32);CCvs.TT+TC(OR=0,49,IC95%=0,23-1,04).Contudo,naanálise desubgrupo,foiencontradaumaassociac¸ãosignificativaparaTTvs.CC+CT(OR=0,77,95% CI=0,42-1.41)napopulac¸ãochinesa.
Conclusão:A presente metanálise sugere que o polimorfismo C47T de SOD2 demonstra associac¸ãosignificativacommaiorriscodePAIRnapopulac¸ãochinesa.Hánecessidadedenovos estudosdegrandeportebemconcebidos,paraconfirmac¸ãodessaassociac¸ão.
© 2016Publicadopor ElsevierEditora Ltda.em nomede Associac¸˜ao Brasileira de Otorrino-laringologia eCirurgiaC´ervico-Facial.Este ´eumartigo Open Accesssob umalicenc¸a CCBY (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Introduction
Noise-inducedhearingloss(NIHL),oneofthemostcommon occupational diseases, is a form of sensorineural hearing impairmentcausedbytheinteractionbetween environmen-tal factors (such as prolonged exposure to high levels of noise) and geneticfactors.1 According to statistical data, aboutone-thirdofallcasesofhearinglosscanbeattributed tonoiseexposure,2and10%oftheworld’spopulationareat riskofdevelopingNIHL.3
Currently,littleisknownaboutgenepolymorphismsthat may be involved in the susceptibility toNIHL. Ohlemiller etal.4 demonstrated thatnoise can damagethe cochlear sensorial epitheliumby inducing the localrelease of free radicals.Consequently,genesinvolvedintheregulationof releasingoffreeradicalswereexamined,5andmanganese superoxidedismutase(SOD2)wasidentified.6
SOD2 is a homotetramer located within the mitochon-drion and is an enzyme involved in the conversion of superoxideradicalstohydrogenperoxide.7Amongthe poly-morphisms identified in the SOD2gene, C47T is themost widely studied. C47T is located at position 16 in the
mitochondrialtargetingsequenceandresultsinthe replace-ment of an alanine with valine (V16A).8,9 C47T has been studiedinassociationwithseveraldiseases(heartdisease,10 diabetes,11 andnonalcoholicfattyliver disease[NAFLD])12 whichincludeNIHL.13 Fortunatoetal.6 previouslyshowed thatSOD2polymorphismscouldpredisposetoNIHLby exert-ing variable local tissue antioxidant roles, whereas Wang et al.14 only showed a weak association between SOD2 polymorphisms and NIHL. The current individual studies providelimitedinformationanddonotproduceaconvincing conclusion.Therefore,inthisstudy,ameta-analysiswitha relativelylargesamplewasconductedinordertogeneratea morereliableconclusionregardingtherelationshipbetween SOD2C47TpolymorphismandNIHL.
Methods
Literaturesearch,selection,anddatacollection
82 WangJetal.
33 articles identified through database searching
16 articles assessed for eligibility
17 duplicated articles excluded
12 articles excluded through title/abstract screening: Not in english (n=5)
Review (n=1) Editorial comment (n=1) Unrelated topic (n=5)
1 article excluded through full text screening: Meeting abstract (n=1)
4 articles assessed for eligibility
3 articles Included In the study
Figure1 Flowchartofstudyinclusion.
terms were used: superoxide dismutase, SOD2, polymor-phism, polymorphisms, variation, variations, genotype, noiseinducedhearingloss,noise-inducedhearingloss,and NIHL.Studiesthatmetthefollowingcriteriawereincluded: (1) full-text, English-written studies; (2) complete case-and-control data about the relationship between SOD2 polymorphism and NIHL; (3) sufficient data to infer the results;and(4)controlgroupgenotypesinHardy---Weinberg Equilibrium(HWE).HWEwastestedbythechi-squaredtest, andwhen ap-valueof morethan 0.05 wasobserved,the controlgroupgenotypeswereconsistentwithHWE.
Inthisstudy,twoinvestigatorsindependentlycollected data from each eligiblearticle. The data comprised first author, year of the publication, origin country, ethnicity, numberofcases,andnumberof controls.Through check-ingbetweenthetwoinvestigators,afinalsetof datawas determined.
Qualityassessment
StudyqualitywasevaluatedbytheNewcastle-Ottawa Qual-ityAssessmentScaleforcase---controlstudies,15inwhichthe qualityof theselectedtrialswasdeterminedonthebasis ofselectionofthestudygroups(0---4points),comparability ofthestudygroups(0---2points),andascertainmentofthe outcomeofinterest(0---3points).
Dataanalysis
TheassociationbetweenC47TpolymorphisminSOD2gene and NIHL susceptibility was estimated under all genetic models. Five comparison models for C47T polymorphism wereevaluated: an allelemodel(Tvs. C),a co-dominant model(TTvs.CCandCTvs.CC),adominantmodel(TT+CT vs.CC),andarecessivemodel(TTvs.CT+CC).
Forthemeta-analysis,pooledoddsratios(ORs)and95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using a fixed effectsmodelorrandomeffectsmodel.Thechosenmodel was based on the results of a heterogeneity test, which employedapreviouslydescribed,I2teststatistics.16IfI2was greaterthan50%,arandomeffectsmodelwasused accord-ingtotheDerSimonianandLairdmethod;otherwise,afixed effects model wasusedaccording tothe Mantel-Haenszel method.
PublicationbiaswastestedusingBegg’sfunnelplotand Egger’s test.17 If the funnel plot was asymmetrical and Egger’s test reported a p-value lower than 0.05, a publi-cationbiaslikelyexisted.
AllofanalyseswereperformedusingStataversion12.0 software(Stata Corporation ---CollegeStation,TX, United States).
Results
Searchresultsandstudycharacteristics
The finalsearch,whichtookplaceonDecember31,2014, resultedintheretrievalof33articles.Themajorityofthe articleswereexcluded duetothe factthatthestudywas aboutanunrelatedtopic,thearticleswerenotinEnglish,or thearticlewasaduplicate,review,orcommentaryarticle, resultinginatotaloffourincluded articles.Aftera study which wasameetingabstractwasomitted,threearticles remained.Thus,threearticleswerefinallyincluded6,14,18in thismeta-analysis,comprising1094subjects,407ofwhom hadNIHL. Thereview processis depictedinFig.1, which followspreviouslypublishedreportingrecommendations.19 Ofthestudies,twowereconductedinthePeople’sRepublic ofChinaandonewasfromItaly.Allthegenotypefrequencies incontrolpopulationswereinWHEagreement(Table1).
Table1 Characteristicsofincludedstudies.
Author Year Country Ethnicity Samplesize
(case/control)
Case (CC/CT/TT)
Control (CC/CT/TT)
pHWE
Fortunatoetal. 2004 Italy White 61/29 14/33/14 4a/19/6 0.08
Liuetal. 2010 China Chinese 201/202 8/55/138 3/38/161 0.66
Lietal. 2014 China Chinese 145/456 3/36/106 6/120/330 0.18
polymorphism
in
SOD2
with
hearing
loss:
a
meta-analysis
83
Table2 Qualityassessmentofincludedstudies.
Author Selection Comparability Exposure Summary
Isthecase definition adequate?
Representativeness ofthecases
Selection ofcontrols
Definition ofcontrols
Ethnicity Age Ascertainment
ofexposure
Samemethodof ascertainmentfor casesandcontrols
Non-response rate
Fortunatoetal. 4.1.3
Liuetal. 4.2.3
Lietal. 3.2.3
Table3 Subgroupanalysisbasedonethnicityforallgeneticmodels.
Ethnicity No.of studies
Samplesize (case/control)
Tvs.C TTvs.CC CTvs.CC TTvs.CC+CT TT+CTvs.CC
OR(95%CI) p OR(95%CI) p OR(95%CI) p OR(95%CI) p OR(95%CI) p
Chinese 2 346/658 0.82(0.61---1.10) 0.12 0.43(0.17---1.11) 0.48 0.57(0.21---1.54) 0.92 0.77(0.42---1.41)a 0.04b 0.46(0.18---1.19) 0.58
White 1 61/29 0.92(0.46---1.85) --- 0.67(0.15---2.89) --- 0.50(0.14---1.73) --- 1.14(0.39---3.36) --- 0.54(0.16---1.81) ---Overall 3 407/687 0.83(0.63---1.09) 0.28 0.49(0.22---1.09) 0.71 0.54(0.25---1.17) 0.98 0.82(0.50---1.32)a 0.12 0.49(0.23---1.04) 0.85
OR,oddsratio;CI,confidenceinterval.
p-Valueforheterogeneitytest;Ifp>0.1,ORswerecalculatedusingafixedeffectsmodel,otherwisetherandomeffectsmodelwasused. a ORswerecalculatedusingtherandomeffectsmodel.
84 WangJetal.
Qualityassessmentoftheincludedstudies
TheNOSforassessingthequalityofcase---controlstudieswas showninTable2.Allofthestudieswereidentifiedas rela-tivelyhigh-qualitybecausethetotalscorewashigherthan7.
Overallandsubgroupmeta-analysisresults
O meta-analysis and subgroup meta-analysis were per-formed based on ethnicity. The detailed results of the meta-analysis are shown in Table 3. Regarding overall
Study
A
T vs. C
B
TT vs. CC
C
E
CT vs. CC
D
TT vs. CC+CT
CC vs. TT+TC
%
Weight ID
Study
ID OR (95% CI)
.406 1 2.46
0.92 (0.46, 1.84)
0.63 (0.41, 0.98)
1.02 (0.68, 1.53) 14.58
44.55
40.86
0.83 (0.63, 1.09) 100.00
%
Weight OR (95% CI)
0.67 (0.15, 2.89)
0.32 (0.08, 1.24)
0.64 (0.16, 2.61) 25.73
48.37
25.90
0.49 (0.22, 1.09) 100.00 Fortunato (2004) Liu (2010) Wang (2014) Overall (I-squared=21.8%, P=.279) Study % Weight
ID OR (95% CI)
.135 1 7.4 .298 1 3.36
0.50 (0.14, 1.73)
0.54 (0.14, 2.18)
0.60 (0.14, 2.52) 42.67
32.83
24.50
0.54 (0.25, 1.17) 100.00 Fortunato (2004) Liu (2010) Wang (2014) Overall (I-squared=0.0%, P=.981) Study % Weight
ID OR (95% CI)
0.54 (0.16, 1.81)
0.36 (0.10, 1.39)
0.63 (0.16, 2.56) 38.56
39.17
22.27
0.49 (0.23, 1.04) 100.00 Fortunato (2004)
Liu (2010)
Wang (2014)
.0951 1 10.5
Overall (I-squared=0.0%. P=.845)
Fortunato (2004)
Liu (2010)
Wang (2014)
.0836 1 12
Overall (I-squared=0.0%, P=.709) Study ID % Weight OR (95% CI)
1.14 (0.39, 3.36)
0.56 (0.35, 0.88)
1.04 (0.68, 1.58) 15.32
41.21
43.47
0.82 (0.50, 1.32) 100.00 Fortunato (2004)
Liu (2010)
Wang (2014)
Note: Weights are from random effect analysis
Overall (I-squared=53.6%, P=.116)
Figure2 Forestplotsregardingtheassociationbetweensuperoxidedismutase2(SOD2)C47Tpolymorphismandnoiseinduced hearingloss(NIHL)underallthegeneticmodelsusingfixedeffectsorrandomeffectsmodels.Allelemodel,Tvs.C(A);co-dominant model,TTvs.CC(B);CTvs.CC(C);recessivemodel,TTvs.CC+CT(D);dominantmodel,CCvs.TT+TC(E).CI,confidenceinterval; OR,oddsratio.
Begg’s funnel plot with pseudo 95% confidence limits Begg’s funnel plot with pseudo 95% confidence limits
A
T vs. CB
TT vs. CC1.5
1
.5
OR
0
2
1
0
OR
–1
0 .2
s.e. of: OR
Begg’s funnel plot with pseudo 95% confidence limits
Begg’s funnel plot with pseudo 95% confidence limits
Begg’s funnel plot with pseudo 95% confidence limits
C
CT vs. CCCC vs. TT+TC
D
E
TT vs. CC+CT
2
1
0
OR
OR
OR
–1
2
1
0
–1
2
1
0
0 .2 .4 .6 .8
0 .2 .4 .6 .8
0 .2 .4 .6
s.e. of: OR
s.e. of: OR
.4 0 .2
s.e. of: OR
s.e. of: OR
.4 .6 .8
Figure3 Begg’sfunnelplotforthesuperoxidedismutase2(SOD2) C47Tpolymorphismandnoiseinducedhearingloss(NIHL). Allelemodel,Tvs.C(A);co-dominantmodel,TTvs.CC(B);CTvs.CC(C);recessivemodel,TTvs.CC+CT(D);dominantmodel, CCvs.TT+TC(E).logor,oddsratiologarithm;s.e.,standarderror.
Publicationbias
The results ofBegg’s funnel plot(Fig. 3and Table4) and Egger’s test (Table 4) showed nopublication bias for the
allele model (T vs. C, p=1.00), dominant model (CC vs. TT+TC,p=0.952),co-dominantmodel(TTvs.CC,p=0.306; CTvs. CC, p=0.215), or recessive model (TT vs. CC+CT, p=0.832).
Table4 PublicationbiasusingBegg’stestandEgger’stestunderforallgeneticmodels.
Tvs.C TTvs.CC CTvs.CC TTvs.CC+CT TT+CTvs.CC
Begg’stest 1.00 0.296 0.296 1.000 1.000
86 WangJetal.
Discussion
Reactiveoxygenspecies(ROS)playakeyroleinthe underly-ingmechanismsofcochleardamageinductionundervarious pathological conditions. Superoxide, which can form the highlytoxicperoxynitrite,isreadilygeneratedintheinner earfollowingacousticoverstimulation.20SODisanenzyme involvedintheregulationofsuperoxidelevelsbyconverting superoxidetohydrogenperoxide.LocalizationofSOD2inthe cochleahasbeen reportedandabsenceof SOD2hasbeen shown toleadtoincreased hearingloss relatedto acous-tictrauma.14,18,21,22Inaddition,auditorydysfunctiondueto noiseexposureisattenuatedbySOD2application. Further-more,transgenicmiceoverexpressingSOD2wereprotected againstaminoglycoside-inducedhearingloss, whichis also mediatedbyROS.23 Todate,severalstudieshaveexplored therelationshipbetweentheSOD2C47Tpolymorphismand NIHLsusceptibility. Forexamples,Fortunato etal.6 previ-ously showed that SOD2 polymorphisms could predispose toNIHLbyexertingvariablelocaltissueantioxidantroles, whereas Wang et al.14 only showed a weak association betweenSOD2polymorphismsandNIHL.However,the pro-tectiveeffectsofSOD2remaincontroversial.
Thepresentstudyanalyzedthedatafromthreestudies thatincluded a total of 407NIHL cases and687 controls. NosignificantassociationsbetweenC47Tpolymorphismand NIHLwereobservedinallmodels.However,whensubgroup analysis based on ethnicity was performed, a significant association was observed between the SOD2 C47T poly-morphism and NIHL in a recessive model (TT vs. CC+CT, OR=0.77, 95% CI=0.42---1.41) in the Chinese population. There was nosignificant association in any other genetic modelsintheChinesepopulation.Tothebestoftheauthor’s knowledge,thiswasthefirstmeta-analysisinvestigatingthe associationbetweentheSOD2C47TpolymorphismandNIHL susceptibility.
Moreover,fixed-effects or random-effects modelswere usedin the analysis of the studies based on heterogene-itytesting.Two studyexhibits asubstantialheterogeneity for the overall analysis. However, according to subgroup analysisbasedonethnicity,nosignificantheterogeneitywas observed.Therefore,furtherexplorationoftheriskfactors forthisconditionisneeded.
Thepresentstudyhassomelimitations.Forinstance,the samplesizeusedinthismeta-analysiswasinsufficient, espe-ciallyforthesubgroupanalysisbasedonethnicity.Moreover, therewasalack ofcase---controldataadjustment accord-ingtodetailedindividualinformation,suchasage,sex,and lifestyle.The third limitationis thatthe exact molecular basisoftheassociation betweenSOD2C47Tpolymorphism andNIHLriskisstillnotclearatpresentandrequiresfurther investigation.
Conclusion
Despite these limitations, the present meta-analysis sug-gested that SOD2 C47T polymorphism is significantly associatedwithanincreasedriskofNIHLintheChinese pop-ulation.Nevertheless,additional,largerandwell-designed studiesareneededtoconfirmthisassociation.
Conflicts
of
interest
Theauthorsdeclarenoconflictsofinterest.
References
1.Sliwinska-KowalskaM,PawelczykM.Contributionofgenetic fac-torsto noise-induced hearing loss: a human studies review. MutatRes.2013;752:61---5.
2.StuckenEZ,HongRS.Noise-inducedhearingloss:an occupa-tionalmedicineperspective.CurrOpinOtolaryngolHeadNeck Surg.2014;22:388---93.
3.BasnerM,BabischW,DavisA,BrinkM,ClarkC,JanssenS,etal. Auditoryandnon-auditoryeffectsofnoiseonhealth.Lancet. 2014;383:1325---32.
4.OhlemillerKK,WrightJS,DuganLL.Earlyelevationofcochlear reactiveoxygenspeciesfollowingnoiseexposure.Audiol Neu-rootol.1999;4:229---36.
5.OhlemillerKK,McFaddenSL,DingDL,FloodDG,ReaumeAG, HoffmanEK,etal.Targeteddeletionofthecytosolic Cu/Zn-superoxide dismutasegene(Sod1) increases susceptibility to noise-inducedhearingloss.AudiolNeurootol.1999;4:237---46. 6.Fortunato G, Marciano E, Zarrilli F, Mazzaccara C, Intrieri
M,CalcagnoG,et al.Paraoxonaseand superoxidedismutase genepolymorphismsandnoise-inducedhearingloss.ClinChem. 2004;50:2012---8.
7.Forsberg L, de Faire U, Morgenstern R. Oxidative stress, humangeneticvariation,anddisease.ArchBiochemBiophys. 2001;389:84---93.
8.RosenblumJS,GilulaNB,LernerRA.Onsignalsequence poly-morphismsanddiseasesofdistribution.ProcNatlAcadSciUS A.1996;93:4471---3.
9.WanXS,DevalarajaMN, St ClairDK.Molecularstructureand organization of thehuman manganese superoxide dismutase gene.DNACellBiol.1994;13:1127---36.
10.TianC,LiuT,FangS,DuX,JiaC.AssociationofC47T polymor-phisminSOD2genewithcoronaryarterydisease:acase---control studyandameta-analysis.MolBiolRep.2012;39:5269---76. 11.TianC,FangS,DuX,JiaC.AssociationoftheC47T
polymor-phisminSOD2withdiabetesmellitusanddiabeticmicrovascular complications:ameta-analysis.Diabetologia.2011;54:803---11. 12.Al-SerriA,AnsteeQM,ValentiL,NobiliV,LeathartJB, Dongio-vanniP,etal.TheSOD2C47TpolymorphisminfluencesNAFLD fibrosisseverity:evidencefromcase---controlandintra-familial alleleassociationstudies.JHepatol.2012;56:448---54. 13.Crawford A, Fassett RG, Geraghty DP, Kunde DA, Ball MJ,
Robertson IK,et al. Relationships between singlenucleotide polymorphisms of antioxidant enzymes and disease. Gene. 2012;501:89---103.
14.WangSL,YuLG,LiuRP,ZhuWZ,GaoWM,XueLP,etal. Gene-geneinteractionofGJB2,SOD2,andCATonoccupational noise-inducedhearinglossinChineseHanpopulation.BiomedEnviron Sci.2014;27:965---8.
15.WellsGA, SheaBJ, O’ConnellD,Peterson J, Welch V,Losos M,etal.TheNewcastle-OttawaScale(NOS)forassessingthe qualityofnonrandomizedstudiesinmeta-analyses;2000. 16.HigginsJP,ThompsonSG.Quantifyingheterogeneityina
meta-analysis.StatMed.2002;21:1539---58.
17.Egger M, Davey Smith G, Schneider M, Minder C. Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ. 1997;315:629---34.
19.MoherD,LiberatiA,TetzlaffJ,AltmanDG.Preferredreporting itemsfor systematic reviewsand meta-analyses:thePRISMA statement.PLoSMed.2009;6:e1000097.
20.KopkeR, AllenKA, Henderson D,Hoffer M,FrenzD,Vande WaterT. Aradicaldemise.Toxinsandtrauma sharecommon pathways in hair cell death. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1999;884: 171---91.
21.Chang NC, Ho CK, Wu MT, Yu ML, Ho KY. Effect of manganese-superoxide dismutase genetic polymorphisms
IVS3-23T/GonnoisesusceptibilityinTaiwan.AmJOtolaryngol. 2009;30:396---400.
22.Nolan LS, Cadge BA, Gomez-Dorado M, Dawson SJ. A func-tional and genetic analysis of SOD2 promoter variants and theircontributiontoage-relatedhearingloss.MechAgeingDev. 2013;134:298---306.