Rev. Bras. Anestesiol. vol.66 número3

RevBrasAnestesiol.2016;66(3):272---275

REVISTA

BRASILEIRA

DE

ANESTESIOLOGIA

SCIENTIFIC

ARTICLE

Evaluation

of

sciatic

nerve

damage

following

intraneural

injection

of

bupivacaine,

levobupivacaine

and

lidocaine

in

rats

Oznur

Sen

,

Nevzat

Cem

Sayilgan

,

Ayse

Cigdem

Tutuncu

,

Mefkur

Bakan

,

Guniz

Meyanci

Koksal

_,

_Huseyin

_Oz

a_{DepartmentofAnesthesiologyandReanimation,MinistryofHealth,HasekiTrainingandResearchHospital,Istanbul,Turkey} b_{DepartmentofAnesthesiologyandReanimation,IstanbulUniversity,CerrahpasaMedicalFaculty,Istanbul,Turkey}

c_{DepartmentofAnesthesiologyandReanimation,BezmialemVakifUniversity,FacultyofMedicine,Istanbul,Turkey} d_{DepartmentofAnesthesiologyandReanimation,MedipolUniversity,FacultyofMedicine,Istanbul,Turkey}

Received11September2014;accepted29September2014

Availableonline12March2015

KEYWORDS

Localanesthetics; Lidocaine; Bupivacaine; Levobupivacaine; Neurotoxicity

Abstract

Objective:Thelocalanestheticsmaycauseneurotoxicity.Weaimedtocomparetheneurotoxic potentialofdifferentlocalanesthetics,localanestheticinducednervedamageandpathological changesofaperipheralnerve.

Methods:SixtyWistarratsweighing200---350gwerestudied.Ratswereassignedinto3groups and26-gaugeneedlewasinsertedundermagnificationinto theleftsciaticnerveand0.2mL of0.5% bupivacaine,5% levobupivacaine, and2% lidocaine were injected intraneurally. An individualwhowasblindtothespecificsoftheinjectionmonitoredtheneurologicfunctionon postoperative1stday,anddailythereafter.Neurologicexaminationincludedassessmentfor thepresenceandseverityofnociceptionandgraspingreflexes.Atthe7thdaysciaticnerve specimenwastakenforevaluationofhistopathologicchanges.

Results:Therewasnostatisticaldifferencedetectedamonggroupsregardinggraspingreflex andhistopathologicevaluation.Twocasesinbupivacainegroup,1caseinlevobupivacainegroup and2casesinlidocainegrouphadslightgrasping,while1caseinlidocainegrouphadnograsping reflexontheseventhday.Severeaxonaldegenerationwasobservedinallgroups,respectively inbupivacainegroup4(20%),levobupivacainegroup3(15%),andlidocainegroup6(30%).

Conclusion:Inallgroups,histopathologicaldamagefrequencyandseverityweremorethanthe motordeficiency.

©2015SociedadeBrasileiradeAnestesiologia.PublishedbyElsevier EditoraLtda.Allrights reserved.

∗_{Correspondingauthor.}

E-mail:senoznur@gmail.com(O.Sen).

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjane.2014.09.012

Intraneuralinjectionofbupivacaine,levobupivacaineandlidocaine 273

PALAVRAS-CHAVE

Anestésicoslocais; Lidocaína; Bupivacaína; Levobupivacaína; Neurotoxicidade

Avaliac¸ãodalesãodonervociáticoapósinjec¸ãointraneuraldebupivacaína,

levobupivacaínaelidocaínaemratos

Resumo

Objetivo: Osanestésicoslocaispodem causarneurotoxicidade.Nossoobjetivo foicomparar opotencialneurotóxicodediferentesanestésicoslocais,osdanosinduzidosaosnervoseas alterac¸õespatológicasdeumnervoperiférico.

Métodos: SessentaratosWhistlerpesando200-350gforamestudados.Osratosforamdivididos em trêsgrupos,umaagulhadecalibre26foiinseridanonervociático esquerdo,comouso deampliac¸ão,e0,2mLdebupivacaínaa0,5%,levobupivacaínaa5%elidocaínaa2%foram injetados porviaintraneural. Umcolaborador, cego para osconteúdos dasinjec¸ões, moni-torouafunc¸ãoneurológicanoprimeirodiadepós-operatórioedepoisdiariamente.Oexame neurológico incluiuaavaliac¸ãodapresenc¸a edagravidadedanocicepc¸ãoedos reflexosde agarrar. Nosétimodia, umaamostradonervociático foicolhida paraavaliarasalterac¸ões histopatológicas.

Resultados: Nãohouvediferenc¸aestatísticaentreosgruposemrelac¸ãoaoreflexodeagarrareà avaliac¸ãohistopatológica.Doiscasosnogrupobupivacaína,umcasonogrupolevobupivacaína edoiscasosnogrupo lidocaínaapresentaramum levereflexodeagarrar;tambémnogrupo lidocaína,umcasonãoapresentoureflexodeagarrarnosétimodia.Degenerac¸ãoaxonalgrave foiobservadaemtodososgrupos:quatrocasosnogrupobupivacaína(20%),trêscasosnogrupo levobupivacaína3(15%)eseiscasosnogrupolidocaína(30%).

Conclusão:Emtodososgrupos,afrequênciadedanohistopatológicoedegravidadefoimaior queadeficiênciamotora.

©2015SociedadeBrasileira deAnestesiologia.PublicadoporElsevierEditoraLtda.Todosos direitosreservados.

Introduction

Effects of intraneural injection of local anesthetics and peripheral nerveinjury arerarecomplications of regional anesthesia. Most of these are temporary, subclinical mononeuropathies.1 _{Reversible axonal damage and injury}

progressing to myelin degeneration can be determined histopathologicallyafterintraneuronalinjections.Inanimal studies, retention of motor functions despite the damage hasbeenobserved.2

Thisstudyhasaimedatinvestigationintheratofmotor dysfunctionandthehistopathologicalchangesafterasingle doseinjectionintraneurallyofbupivacaine,levobupivacaine andlidocaine.

Methods

Hospital Animal Ethics Council approval was obtained for thisstudy.SixtyWistarratsof200---350gweightwerekept inthelaboratoryunderconditionsof20---24◦_{Ctemperature,} 65---70%humidity,12hlightand12hdarkwithunrestricted feed and liquid requirements. Experimentally, the rats wereanesthetized,afterfoodwithdrawalfor4h,by intra-peritoneal injection of 100mg/kg ketamine hydrochloride (Ketalar®_{, Eczacıbas¸ı Warner Lambert, ˙Istanbul, Turkey).}

Subsequently,theglutealmuscleareawascleanedwith bat-ticonantisepticsolutionandthesciaticnervewasexposed throughalimitedtransverseincision.Intraneuralinjections were made with the use of an automatic infusion pump throughno26cannulaenteredat45---60◦ _angles.

The ratsweresubdivided intothreegroups asGroup B (Bupivacaine)given0.2mL0.5%bupivacaine;GroupC (Chi-rocaine)given 0.2mL 0.5% levobupivacaine, and Group L (Lidocaine)given0.2mL2%lidocaineover1mininfusions. Theratswerewokenupafterclosingtheincisions.

Neurological functions of the rats were evaluated by threeindividuals,not informedof theapplied local anes-thetics, every day up to 7 days after the intraneural injections. For neurological assessment, nociception and thegrasping reflexwere evaluated. Nociception was trig-geredbypainonthefirstandthefifthphalangesandrated as 4/‘normal withdrawal reflex’, 3/‘slower withdrawal’; 2/‘slow withdrawal or sound; absence of movement’; 1/‘very slight withdrawal’; 0/‘no withdrawal’; and the grasping reflex was rated as 2/‘normal grasping reflex; 1/‘slowgrasping’;0/‘absenceofgrasping’.

The ratsweregivenketaminehydrochloride, sacrificed bydecapitationandthesciaticnervewasexcised.The sam-pleswereroutinely placedin10% bufferedformaldehyde, embedded in paraffin, dyed with haemotoxylin and eosin andexamined underlight microscopyfor integrity of the neurologicalstructure,mechanicaldamage,myelindamage andcellularinfiltration.

Myelin damage was estimated using the Nerve Injury ScoringSystem (NISS), andthescoring wasas1=‘normal, mild degeneration or demyelination’, 2=‘moderate level of degeneration’ or (<50% damaged nerve tissue) and 3=diffusedegenerationordemyelinization(>50%damaged nervetissue).

274 O.Senetal. 20 19 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 Rat 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 1

Bupivacaine Chiocaine Lidocaine

2 3

Grassping 2 Grassping 1 Grassping 0

4 5 6 7 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 4

2

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

5 3 3 8 8 10 10

15 15 15 17 7 7 2 2 2 4 4 8 7 7 4 2 9

19 19 19

5 4 2 2 10 6 10 12 13 16 18 18 10 15 16 18

Figure1 Graspingreflexes.

Thedamagescoreswereestimatedforeachofthe anesthet-icsusedwiththeone-wayANOVAtestandthevaluep<0.05 wastakentorepresentstatisticalsignificance.

Results

There was no statistically significant difference in the weightsof the3 groups of rats. Also,therewere no sta-tisticallysignificantdifferencesbetweenthegraspingreflex scoresofthethreegroups.

In the intragroup comparisons, however, there was a statisticallysignificantincrease inthegraspingreflexes of GroupB(p=0.003)andC(p=0.0081)onthethirddayand inGroupL(p=0.004)onthefourthdayafterinjectionsas comparedtothe first day (Fig.1). Results of nociception evaluationonresponsetopainonthefirstandthefifth pha-langeswereintactinallgroupsfromthefirstdayonwards. Histopathologicalratingof NISS asmild, moderateand severedamageinGroupB(35%,45%and,20%respectively), Group C (45%, 40% and 15% respectively) and in Group L (20%,50%and30%)didnotyieldstatisticallysignificant dif-ferencesbetweenthegroups(Fig.2).

Discussion

During regional anesthesia peripheral nerve damage is a rarely observed complication with the incidence varying between0.5%and1%intheretrospectivelyscannedstudies. Theseinjuriesaremostlyreversibleanddevelopas subcli-nicalormildmononeuropathies.Themechanismofdamage developingafter intraneuralinjections hasnotbeen com-pletelyunderstood.3_{Conventionallocalanestheticsarealso}

neurotoxic.4---6_{This damageprobablyresultsfrom}

mechan-ical trauma, the chemical and toxic effects of the local anesthetics,ischemiaoracombinationofthesefactors.

In ourstudy the response topain perception fromthe firsttotheseventhdayafterinjections wascompleteand itwasthesameinalltheexperimentalgroupssuchthatno differencescouldbeobserved.

20 19 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0

Bupivacaine Chiocaine Lidocaine 7 9 4 3 8 9 4 10

Axonal degeneration and edema more than 50%

Edema and degeneration less than 50%

Minimal edema and normal nerve tissue

6

Figure2 HistopathologicalratingofNISS.

With respect to the grasping reflex, despite the lack of statistically significant intergroup differences, the sev-enthdaypost-injectionresultsshowedcontinuationofslow graspingin2ratsofGroupB,andin1ratofGroupC,while inGroupL,thereflexwasabsentin1ratandslowin2rats. Histopathologicalevaluationsshowedthat 4rats inGroup B,3ratsinGroupCand6ratsinGroupLdevelopedsevere axonaldegeneration.

Yamashita et al.4 _{investigated the neurological and}

histopathological effects and the glutamate concentra-tion in the cerebrospinal fluid of 5 groups of rats one week after the injection of 0.3mL NaCl, 2% tetra-caine, 10% lidocaine, 2% bupivacaine and2% ropivacaine. Whereas the CSF glutamate concentrations had signifi-cantly increasedin all groups; there were nostatistically significant differencesin theneurologicalandmotor func-tions between the groups except the lidocaine group that showed significant dysfunction. Histopathological changes were characterized by the width of vacuolation in the dorsal funiculus and was in the respective order oflidocaine=tetracaine>bupivacaine>ropivacainegroups. Similarly,inourstudy,althoughstatisticallysignificant dif-ferences were not observed, the pronounced toxicity of lidocainewasevidentwithonerathavingtotallossofmotor functionwithtwoothersshowingmildloss.

HistopathologicalinvestigationbyYamashitaetal.4_also

revealed that although the neuronal damage was equally advancedinthelidocaineandtetracaineinjectedrats,the neurologicalandmotorfunctiondeficit wasseverer inthe lidocaine group which suggests that the margin of safety withlidocaineisverynarrow.

Anotherconflicting observationin ourstudyis thatthe severityofhistopathologicaldamageandthelossofmotor functiondidnotprogressinparallel.Iohometal.7_inastudy

Intraneuralinjectionofbupivacaine,levobupivacaineandlidocaine 275

histologicalobservationof neuronaldamagein 60%of the intraneurallyinjectedpigs. Similarly,in ourstudy,despite theobservationofmassiveaxonaldegenerationin4,3and 6ratsof,respectively,GroupsB,CandL,onlymildlossof motorfunction wasobserved in2,1and2 ratsof respec-tivelyGroupB,CandL,withtotallossoffunctionin1rat ofGroupL.

Raducan et al.9 _{aimed to characterize morphological}

andfunctional aspectsof sciaticnerve regeneration after mechanicalcrushinjuryinrodents.Ratnervesampleswere collectedbeforeinjuryandafter24h,fourdays,twoweeks, and four weeks after injury. They found that morpho-logicmostevidentchangescausedbyaxonaldegeneration observedafterfourdayspost-injury.Afterfourweeks,the number anddensity of the regenerated myelinated axons werehighercomparedtocontrols. About themotor func-tion,theyfound that markeddecreaseonfunction in the first week followed by a gradual recovery of normal gait duringthefollowingweeks,sothatbytheendofthefourth weekanimal’sregainednormalgait.Raducan’sstudydiffers fromours withrespecttogeneration ofa crushinjury. In their study,massive axonal degeneration withmotor dys-function and their normalizations coincide. But ourstudy andothers,theneurotoxiceffectoflocalanestheticagents alsoarepresent.Ontheotherhand,weevaluatedthemotor functiontesttill7daysandtookhistopathologicspecimens on7thday.However,inthestudyperformedbyIohometal., evaluation was performed on the 67th day in which the motordysfunctionwasimprovedtotally,whereasthe mas-sivehistopathologicdamagecontinued.

According to our study, intraneural injection of local anesthetics may cause both histopathologic changes and motordeficiencyinvariousfrequencyandseverityinrats. Thehigherfrequencyandseverityofhistopathologic dam-agemorethanthatofmotordeficiencyarereasonable,but

histopathologicaldamageandthelossofmotorfunctionmay notprogressinparallel.

Conflicts

of

interest

Theauthorsdeclarenoconflictsofinterest.

References

1.LinguoryGA.Complicationsofregionalanesthesia:nerveinjury and peripheral neural blockade. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 2004;16:84---6.

2.BigeleisenPE.Nervepunctureandapparentintraneuralinjection duringultrasound-guidedaxillaryblockdoesnotinvariablyresult inneurologicinjury.Anesthesiology.2006;105:779---83.

3.Jeng CL. Intraneural injections and regional anesthesia: the knownandunknown.MinervaAnesthesiol.2011;77:54---8.

4.Yamashita A, Matsumato M, Matsumato S. A comparison of theneurotoxic effects on thespinal cord oftetracaine, lido-caine,bupivacaine,andropivacaineadministeredintrathecally inrabbits.AnesthAnalg.2003;97:512---9.

5.Epstein-BarashH,ShichorI,HwonAH.Prolongeddurationlocal anesthesia with minimal toxicity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106:7125---30.

6.MillerRD.Miller’sanesthesia.7thed.Philadelphia,PA:Churchill Livingston/Elsevier;2010.

7.IohomG,LanGB,DiarraDP.Long-termevaluationofmotor func-tionfollowingintraneuralinjectionofropivacaineusingwalking trackanalysisinrats.BrJAnaesth.2005;94:524---9.

8.LupuCM, Kiehl TR, ChanVW. Nerve expansion seen on ultra-soundpredicts histologicbutnotfunctionalnerveinjury after intraneural injection in pigs. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2010;35: 132---9.