• Nenhum resultado encontrado

Sistema de Gestão do Conhecimento e Desempenho Financeiro : como esta Relação foi medido

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2018

Share "Sistema de Gestão do Conhecimento e Desempenho Financeiro : como esta Relação foi medido"

Copied!
27
0
0

Texto

(1)

$ % & '" ( $)*+( )*( )+,,-*+.( )/! ) *0+1

! " #$ % "

& &' % "

( ) *

) "

) "

+

, +

" $ &

"

-" #$ %

. +

#" " $

/01203* 4 #

5 # " /01163 # $ & *

$ + * &( +

78-!'& 9 : + ;' !

+ #

# $ & $ + * * "

; ! +

/;! 3 < + #"

" $ + = ; * *

* + #

# ) " $ & $ + *

" " )

" $ + = ; >

+ $

" ?@@ ( @21 26A1@2AB2%6CDD@0EC0

!

(2)

$ % & '" ( $)*+( )*( )+,,-*+.( )/! ) *0+1

( )

* #$$%

" + " ,

+ , #$$'

-"

(

(. " . "

/ . "

" "

"

" * 0

= > ? ,

, ( . ,

! , 1 "

!

"

#

$

%

2

3 4 + 3+

-5( 6

)

74 8

9 4 :

! " #$$% #$&'

; "

- 2

: 3+

* #$$% 2

)

+ " , + , #$$' 2

-< )

74 : 3+

(

9 ) 3+

(. ) 74 6 " 7=

74 / 8

- 6

(3)

$ % & '" ( $)*+( )*( )+,,-*+.( )/! ) *0+1 &

3+ >

? "

- 3+

# + % " + ? 3 4 + ,

3 4 + , 5 ( ,

! 4 : , 1 "

2 *.)++)*0+3 4 *1)0.)*0+1

'

4 $

$ 5 4678 92: 2; 4 ( +<<,=)

> ?

( $

5 =

$ ) : ( >

5@9A 4 A7 B;( *0++=)

$ $ ( C

5 4678 92: 2; 4?( +<<,=)

D ( E C 5*0+.= $

? (

$ (

? > ) F & $ $

) F (

$ ? )

: $

) @ $ ( +<,0 (

> ?

5877AG( *00*=) E 8 5+<<1=( F

C $

(

? ( ( )

8

? ) : ( 7 E 4 - 5*0++=

?

$ )

?

$

(4)

$ % & '" ( $)*+( )*( )+,,-*+.( )/! ) *0+1

5 =) ; ? (

(

) 5@9A 4 A7 B;( *0++=)

$ $

? (

? 5 = $ 5 @78 @;48H @78H( *00<=)

A ? $

$ 5D9 @& ( *0+.=)

9 $ ? (

-$ ( $ ?

( ?

-?

)

( $ $ ?

$ $ $ 5 A46 96&I F4F&I(

*0+J=) 4 - 52F:=( $

C $ ( (

( - 5@9A 4 A7

B;( *0++=) $ ?

( ( C

( K

$ ) : >

2F6( ? - $

? 5 )-G) ( *00<=)

( (

5@7 48 4AA&8H( *00J=)

@ ( *00<

*0+3 5 =(

$ )

: +(

) & * $

? ) : J) 8 > (

.( ) : ( 3(

)

( )

*

*

)-G) E 5*001= $ $

+<<3 *00.( >

$ ) : $ (

(5)

$ % & '" ( $)*+( )*( )+,,-*+.( )/! ) *0+1 (

+ L : $

@78 E @78 5*001=)

)-G) E 5*001= $

( C $ (

C $ ( (

-( ( > (

! - (

) 4 ( *000

*00. C $ )

* - 4 )-G) E

5*001=

@78 E @78 5*001( ) +1=)

: ? $

$

? ) &

( ( ! ( $

( )

B) @ ( D B 5*0++= $

> @ A (

(6)

$ % & '" ( $)*+( )*( )+,,-*+.( )/! ) *0+1 +

$ 5 =

5 = ) : (

$ ) :

? ( ( $ $ $

? ( ? ( ? ( (

> M

)

( / $

C (

> $ &: ) : (

?

$ $ (

? 572& 98 29:@F72H( *0+3=)

E 9 ( 5*0+3= $

$ ) A ?

)

2 $ $ >

? ? 5 = )

7 $ C

> ? (

$ ?

) $

-) :

$ $

)5 9@78 9A 78( *0+3= $

( $ $ ) G ( 5*00<=

?

$ $ (

( $ ) (

K $ ) &

> $

> ? ) : (

-? $ ) @ $ (

$ ?

)

)-8) E A 5*0++=

? $ > ?

5 ) )( ? =

$

) :

? $ $

(7)

$ % & '" ( $)*+( )*( )+,,-*+.( )/! ) *0+1 ,

?

$ ( ? $ ?

$ > ?

) & ?

$ ( $

? $ (

$ ( >

? ) & (

( $ $ ( ? (

( &: (

$ ) :

? )

4 7 ? E 2 ( 5*00<( ) +3<=( &

5& = $

$ ?

)

( &: (

( ?

-( ( ? (

C )

? 5 ) ) $ ) > = $

$ $ $ ?

-) & ( ( (

$

) & (

? (

) 4 (

( (

$ )

$ $

$ $ ) $

(

?

> ? ) 7 $ ?

C ( (

> ? C ( ? $

( C ( > ( (

? ( ? C (

? ? ) ?

C $ ?

( (

-5 C

? ? =( C ( $ (

C ( (

C ( ( ( (

(8)

$ % & '" ( $)*+( )*( )+,,-*+.( )/! ) *0+1

-$ ( ( C (

( 5D9 @& ( *0+.=)

( ( # ?(

( E 5*00<= $ $

? ) ?

=

> ? = >

? = ?

= $ ? )

# ( $ F ( E 5*0+0( ) J= > > *

) :

5 =( 5 2 =

? 5 = (

) :

> ( 2 ( /

&:-) 4 ( ? )

: ! $ 5 =

( ?

) N:

? C $ ?

? $

? $ > O

54A46& A7& 872( *00+( ) +=) 4 B 5*00,=(

( $ ?

)

>

) : 8 ( H ( E 5 *003=( N

)

A C (

C O) 4

5F48 F4 ;D&( *001=( $ $

-$ 5 =

( $ (

$ ( 5 = ( ( $

( 5 = ( (

$ ( 5 $= $ $

)

? ? 5*003= $

$ $

$

) 4 $

$ $ $ )

$ $ ´ $ (

(9)

$ % & '" ( $)*+( )*( )+,,-*+.( )/! ) *0+1 .

& ( ?

? 5*003= @ 5@9( *00<=

7 4 5+<<<=)

+ $

: ? $ $

! ) ( F

$ ) 4 ( $

$ ) :

5*00.=) : $

( C (

( $ ( > (

) : > ) :

$ $ (

) ( N O )

+/

: $ $ (

( ?

$ ) 4 $ $

$ ?

? $ > ) :

? ( C (

( ( C (

> ( ) : C

)

+/( $

0

: ? C

=2Q+ B ?

=2Q* B

=2QJ B

$ $

$

: ! $ 2Q+

(10)

$ % & '" ( $)*+( )*( )+,,-*+.( )/! ) *0+1 1

(

C ) :

A ? 5+<*1= # ) : 2Q*

?

) ( 2QJ

) &

( ? ? 5*003=)

+/+ $

#

+/+/

: $ ?

) F (

9 ; ) & (

) &

) : **1

9 ; +,R ( .+J )

)

+/+/(

#

4 (

5S? S T S

S=) :

) & *, D *0+3) &

.+J ) 9

) 4 $ # ( JR+

) 4 # (

( J1R C ) 4 $

( .. ) :

( ) & > >

)

+/+/+ '

2

: ?

= 4 !

= *00< *0+3

(11)

$ % & '" ( $)*+( )*( )+,,-*+.( )/! ) *0+1

= $

( )

= $ > (

= $ > (

)

: ? >

= )

=F ? ( ( ( ( (

$ ( ( $ ( ( (

( K (

? ( (

= *00<

*0+3

= >

&:-= $ )

+/, !

3

: $ ( ( $

?

? $ C $ $

) 8 $ (

? $ $ ) :

) ( $ 7 (

) : $

$ )

( -? !

(

)

8 > ( $ !

$ )

(12)

$ % & '" ( $)*+( )*( )+,,-*+.( )/! ) *0+1

: $ ? $ $

=: > $

> ) : ?

! $ )

= (

? (

( $

N7> O( N7> O N O(

>

− $ (

? !

$

− (

)

5 &: =)

=4 (

? (

)

= : $ (

) :

> $ 5#4 ( *00<=

)

B > ?

)

> ( > (

> ) & N $

4 O) & (

(13)

$ % & '" ( $)*+( )*( )+,,-*+.( )/! ) *0+1 (&&

) & (

$ (

> ) & N7 4

7 : 2 & $ O 5#48 (

*0+0=) & ( 7 (

$ N - ( ( - (

-$ $

) 7 (

7 2 572 =( 5 =(

2 5 2 =(

5 =( 5 =O) :

..

$ ) :

4 > 4) (

? ( C

>

) & (

)

: $

$ ( $ ( ?

$ ) : (

$

$ $ $ $ ?

)

+/- "

2

: >

$ ) 4 $ (

> 5! =( (

( ( ( (

5 C $ =

)

F ( $

$ ( > ) &

( (

(

$ ) B (

)

+/. "

B (

) : $

(14)

$ % & '" ( $)*+( )*( )+,,-*+.( )/! ) *0+1 (&

, $

)

( @ 5*00<=)

(

? ? 5*003=) : ( C

) (

$ ( $

$ 4 ( )

,/

#

: J $ C

@ 5*00<=) &

( +1+ ) ? N O

? N 7 & O

510U > .0U $ =) &:( & (

4 C ?

) & ( +* +1+

)

: J L $ C -

KM Enabler or Infrastructure 65 40%

IT 13 8%

Intellectual Capital 11 7%

Culture 10 6%

Strategy 6 4%

Organizational Structure 4 2%

Leadership 2 1%

Responsiveness 1 1%

structure 1 1%

Social Capital 1 1%

Extension of KMS 1 1%

Utilization 1 1%

Mechanisms and practices of KMS 1 1%

Assets 1 1%

Objective 1 1%

Processors 1 1%

Tacit Knowledge 1 1%

Processes 1 1%

Explicit Knowledge 1 1%

system-oriented strategy 1 1% Knowledge From Customer 1 1% Knowledge about Customer 1 1% Collaborative experience 1 1% Knowledge for Customer 1 1%

Incentive 1 1%

Size 1 1%

2 )

,/(

'

:

) & .. ( +13 $

) : ,,

3J ´ ) @ $ (

(15)

$ % & '" ( $)*+( )*( )+,,-*+.( )/! ) *0+1 (&(

) : ,,

N9 O N9

O ? ? 5*003=)

: 5 =(

,, J* ? ? 5*003=)

: > ( ( ) &

( ´ > 7

6 4 5764= N9

- 4 O ? N O) : . 3

$ C

´ 5*003= ?)

: . - 4 $ C

Group Operational Organizational % by total % by group

1-Growth 31 19% 27%

1-Accounting returns 70 42% 61%

1-Stock market 9 5% 8%

1-Hybrids 5 3% 4%

2-Operations 16 10% 32%

2-Marketing 12 7% 24%

1-Stock market 1 1% 2%

2-Service Quality 13 8% 26%

2-Hybrids 3 2% 6%

2-Technology development 4 2% 8%

2-Infraestruture 1 1% 2%

Total (absolute frequency) 50 115 165

2 )

: . ( ( S4 S

$ C 5.*U=( N9 O 5+0U=

N $ Q O 5,U=) : 3 ?

) & $ ( 9 (

C ( 29& ? ) 4

( $ C ( /> />

(16)

$ % & '" ( $)*+( )*( )+,,-*+.( )/! ) *0+1 (&+

: 3 - 4 $ C

Indicators by categorie tional level

Opera- Organi-zational

level

Abso-lute

freq % Indicators by categorie Opera-tional level

Organi-zational level

Abso-lute

freq %

1-Accounting returns 70 70 42% 2-Hybrids 3 3 2%

Profit scale 32 32 19% CAR (Cumulative Abnormal Return) 1 1 1%

ROI 14 14 8% Employee satisfaction 1 1 1%

ROA 12 12 7% Stock price / earnings 1 1 1%

ROE 6 6 4% 2-Infraestruture 1 1 1%

cash flow / assets 3 3 2% collaborative success scale 1 1 1%

ROS 1 1 1% 2-Marketing 12 12 7%

net income 1 1 1% Sales /x 6 6 4%

financial 1 1 1% revenue 4 4 2%

1-Growth 31 31 19% sales/x 2 2 1%

market share 13 13 8% 2-Operations 16 16 10%

Growth scale 12 12 7% Costx/x * 6 6 4%

Sales growth 6 6 4% productivity 3 3 2%

1-Hybrids 5 5 3% product quality scale 2 2 1%

overall performance scale 4 4 2% Cycle time 2 2 1%

Stock price / earnings 1 1 1% ocupancy/load rate 1 1 1%

1-Stock market 1 9 10 6% competitiveness 1 1 1%

Tobin Q 7 7 4% efficiency 1 1 1%

Security analyst assessments 1 2 3 2% 2-Service Quality 13 13 8%

service quality 11 11 7%

customer satisfaction 2 2 1%

2-Technology development 4 4 2%

Innovation scale 4 4 2%

Absolute and relative frequency of categorized indicators

2 )

,/+ $

#

#

#

? +*

(

C ( ( &:(

) 4 C

L 294 29&)

: 1 - 8 ?

KM Practices Costx /x

Growth scale

market share

Profit

scale ROA ROI Sales

/x

service quality KM Enabler or Infrastructure

Culture 1 2 1 13 4 4 2

Intellectual Capital 1 1 4 4 3 2 4 1

Strategy 1 2 3 5 1 1

Utilization 1 1

IT 1 2 1 12 6 6 2 3

KM Processes

Acquistion 1 4 3 14 7 6 2 1

Application 1 1 5 3 1 1 2

Codification 3 2 4 1 1 1

Conversion 1 4 3 1 1

Creation 3 2 9 3 4

Sharing 2 4 4 10 5 2 4

Utilization 1 1 8 2 4

Financial Performance Indicators

2 )

,/,

B )

$ $ $ )

(17)

$ % & '" ( $)*+( )*( )+,,-*+.( )/! ) *0+1 (&,

) .0U C 5 7 =( RU

RU ) 2

? H

5 H=( 48964( F ? 5F8= (

52 :=( 8 8 ?( 6 ( : )

,/- 43

#

#

7$

$ *0+0(

$ )

J

-Publications / Year

5

7 7 8 7

4 6 5 12 19 27 40 44 33 0 2 4 6 8 10 2 0 0 9 2 0 1 0 2 0 1 1 2 0 1 2 2 0 1 3 2 0 1 4 2 0 1 5 0 10 20 30 40 50 Growth Accumative 2 )

,/. 43

5 #

7$ A ?

5+<*1= ? N $ C $ O

)

& ( ! 7 ? ( H)

2 ( @ 8) + )

4 C $

? $ ) 4 > (

? ( $

( (

? ( ? )

9 $ (

$ ( $ # )

@ $ $ C $

)

8 3+U

) & 3 $

.0U ) D

(18)

$ % & '" ( $)*+( )*( )+,,-*+.( )/! ) *0+1

(&-- !

: (

$ ) @ $ (

(

-? ) ?

$ ( $ $

$ ) : ?

C C )

> ?

? ( ( >

$ > (

) F ( ( $

B) @ ( D B 5*0++=

$

) : ?)

4 ! $ $ ?) &

$ > ) A ? 5+<*1= #

) :

? ) 4

? ?

5*003=) :

( $ $ ?

> ) ( .J $

+ ) :

(

( ? 29&) @ $ ( !

(

( $

)

B $ > (

? $ $ ) F

?

-) : $

?( $ $

> ?

)

$

4 @4648( ) 7A4@&( F) D4 42&( ) 4 ?

(19)

$ % & '" ( $)*+( )*( )+,,-*+.( )/! ) *0+1 (&.

2 1 A + 2 @ ( $)

B( ) .( ) JJJ-J1,( *0+.) 4$ V // ) /+0)++0,/7F

-0R-*0+.-00J3W) 4 *0 ) *0+3)

4A46&( ) A7& 872( ) 7) ?

) @

C ( $) *3( ) +( ) +0R-+J1( *00+) 4$

V // )! ) / /J*30<1+W 4 *0 ) *0+3)

48 72 78( 4) : 4: 1 ) Arthur

Andersern Business Consulting, 1999. p. 1-6, 4$

V // ) / / /

/+<<,/:@7 4: D ) W) 4 *0 ) *0+3)

48 27764( :) &48:9( 4) ?

A ? ? ( $

) D ( $) +1( ) .( ) 1+R-1J1(

*0+*) 4$ V // ) /+0)++0,/+J1RJ*R+*++*.1+,3W)

4 *0 ) *0+3)

4 &47&( ) D; 9@( 2) 4 $ :

) 5 ( $) 'E ) J(

) 11,-1<R( *0+3) 4$ V // ) /+0)++0,/

-03-*0+.-0J00W) 4 *0 ) *0+3)

BANFF, A.; BAPUJI, H. Firm performance: a multidimensional operationalization.

2006. 4$

V // ) ) / /4 4 /$*R/ / $ / /

) X Y+11W) 4 *0 ) *0+3)

@42798 ; ( ) @48 4-8H467D( ) &

? - ) @

5 ( $) +0,( ) 1( ) ,+*-,*,( *00,) ISSN 02635577.

4$ V // ) /+0)++0,/0*1J33R0,+0,,.0*+W) 4

*0 ) *0+3)

@78( )-D) & $ )

D 2 ( $) JJ( ) +3.-+RJ(

*0+.) ISSN 0923-4748. 4$

V // >) ) /+0)+0+1/!)! )*0+.)01)00JW) 4 *0

) *0+3)

@78( )-8) A&48H( :)- ) $

) 2 +

! / ( $) +0( ) +( ) R3 - ,.( *0++) ISSN 1567-4223.

4$ V // >) ) /+0)+0+1/!) )*0+0)+0)00.W)

4 *0 ) *0+3)

@78( )-G) @78( 4)- )

$ $ +<<3 *00.) D @

(20)

$ % & '" ( $)*+( )*( )+,,-*+.( )/! ) *0+1 (&1

V //! ) ) / /J*/+/+R) W) 4 *0 )

*0+3)

@78( )-G) @;48H( )-D) @78H( G)- ) ?

$ $

) 2 / ( $) J1( ) .( ) ,..< - ,.3<(

*00<) ISSN 0957-4174. 4$

V // >) ) /+0)+0+1/!) )*00,)+0)01RW) 4 *0 )

*0+3)

@9&( F) D98H( 4) ) 4 ?

? $ ) @ F

( $) .R( ) +( ) .*-3*( *0+0) ISSN 0378-7206. V4$

// >) ) /+0)+0+1/!) )*00<)+0)00+W) 4 *0 ) *0+3)

@;48H( )-@) A&49( ) A&8( ) ?

) @ ( $) +.( ) J( )

*+R-*J0( *0+J) ISSN 1385951X. 4$

V // ) /+0)+00R/ +0R<<-0+J-0+3J-+W) 4 *0 ) *0+3) 9@78( D) ) 9A 78( )

$ (

$ ) 2 / ( $) .*( ) J( ) ++R,

-++,,( *0+3) ISSN 0957-4174. 4$

V // ) /+0)+0+1/!) )*0+.)0<)00*W) 4 *0 ) *0+3)

4678 92:( :) @) 2; 4 ( A) G A

? ) F , MA @ $ F ( +<<,)

4$ V // ? ) ) ) / ? Y -F2E YE

Y-.-R$ 6H3 E Y E Y 2RE CYB ? T T@ T9

T TB T: T TF T: T@)T $ T TA

T ?)E Y #Z !A,E Y7 8 7**4+ &3*Z. 0 C ?W)

4 *0 ) *0+3)

7 98 ( ) A) ? $

4 7 5 4 7=

) 5 ( $) 31( ) J., - J10( *0+J) ISSN

0167-9236. 4$ V // >) ) /+0)+0+1/!) )*0+J)0R)00+W)

4 *0 ) *0+3)

7A78( ) 4 $

? ) 5

( $) 3.( ) *( ) ++30-++10( *0+J) ISSN 0167-9236.

4$ V // >) ) /+0)+0+1/!) )*0+*)+0)0.0W) 4

*0 ) *0+3)

72& 98( H) ) 29:@F72H( @) 8) &

-? ) @ ( $) J,( ) *( )

+3<-+13( *00<) ISSN 0019-8501. 4$

V // >) ) /+0)+0+1/!) )*00,)+*)00+W) 4 *0

(21)

$ % & '" ( $)*+( )*( )+,,-*+.( )/! ) *0+1 (&

72& 98( H) ) 29:@F72H( @) 8) $

) @ 2 5 ; H

2 I 2 ( $) *+( ) *( ) 3,-1.( *0+3) ISSN 1135-2523.

4$ V // >) ) /+0)+0+1/!) )*0+.)0<)00*W)

4 *0 ) *0+3)

HAO, Q.; KASPER, H.; MUEHLBACHER, J. How does organizational structure

influence performance through learning and innovation in Austria and China. Chinese

Management Studies, v. 6, n. 1, p. 36 - 52, 2012. ISSN 1750614X. 4$

V // ) /+0)++0,/+R301+.+*++*+JR+RW) 4 *0 )

*0+3)

HEDMAN, J.; KALLING, T. The business model concept: theoretical underpinnings

and empirical illustrations. European journal of information systems, v. 12, n. 1, p. 49

- 59, 2003. 4$ V // ) $

-! ) / ! /! /$+*/ +/ /J000..1 ) W) 4 *0

) *0+3)

HO, C.-T. The relationship between knowledge management enablers and

performance. Industrial Management and Data Systems, v. 109, n. 1, p. 98-117,

2009. ISSN 02635577. 4$

V // ) /+0)++0,/0*1J33R0<+0<*11+,W 5 *0)0<)*0+3)=

HOLSAPPLE, C. W.; WU, J. An elusive antecedent of superior firm performance: the

knowledge management factor. Decision Support Systems, v. 52, n. 1, p. 271-283,

2011. ISSN 0167-9236. 4$

V // >) ) /+0)+0+1/!) )*0++)0,)00JW) 4 *0 )

*0+3)

HSU, I.-C.; SABHERWAL, R. Relationship between intellectual capital and

knowledge management: an empirical investigation. Decision Sciences, v. 43, n. 3, p.

489 - 524, 2012. ISSN 00117315. 4$

V // ) /+0)++++/!)+3.0-3<+3)*0+*)00J3R)>W) 4 *0 ) *0+3)

HU, Y. The impact of market orientation on knowledge management: an empirical

investigation in china. In: INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON KNOWLEDGE

DISCOVERY AND DATA MINING, 3., WKDD 2010. Proceedings… 2010. p. 432 -

435. ISBN 978-0-7695-3923-2. ? ) 4$

V // ) /+0)++0</B )*0+0)<RW) 4 *0 ) *0+3)

JOSHI, H.; CHAWLA, D.; FAROOQUIE, J. Segmenting knowledge management (KM) practitioners and its relationship to performance variation some empirical

evidence. Journal of Knowledge Management, v. 18, n. 3, p. 469-493, 2014. ISSN

13673270. 4$ V // ) /+0)++0,/D -+0-*0+J-0J,0W)

4 *0 ) *0+3)

KAMYA, M.; NTAYI, J.; AHIAUZU, A. Organisational learning and competitive advantage: Testing for the interacting inuence of knowledge management and

innovation. International Journal of Innovation and Learning, v. 10, n. 4, p. 376 - 401,

2011. ISSN 14718197. 4$

(22)

$ % & '" ( $)*+( )*( )+,,-*+.( )/! ) *0+1 (&

KAPLAN, R. S.; NORTON, D. P. Using the balanced scorecard as a strategic

management system. Boston, MA: Harvard Business Review, 1996. 4$

V // ) ??) / /? / -**)+300/ /:;-**[+300[

-[[+[[? [[[ [[+<<1[) W) 4 *0)0<)*0+3)

KARJALAINEN, J.; VALTAKOSKI, A. On the role of partners in a multi-disciplinary

business network: a knowledge management perspective. In: ANNUAL HAWAII

INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SYSTEM SCIENCES. [s.n.], 2010.

Proceedings… 2010. ISBN 978-0-7695-3869-3. 4$

V // ) /+0)++0</@& )*0+0).11W) 4 *0 ) *0+3)

KIANTO, A. et al. The impact of knowledge management practices on organizational

performance. In: EUROPEAN CONFERENCE ON KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT,

ECKM. [s.n.], 2013. Proceedings… 2013. v. 1, p. 356 - 361. ISBN

978-1-62993-140-1. ) 4$

V // ) ) / / ) Y*-

*)0-,.,<J33J1<0E & Y.0E 3Y + J** ,R * J+R0<**. < JJ

3 W) 4 *0 ) *0+3)

KITCHENHAM, B. Procedures for performing systematic reviews. Keele, UK, Keele

University, v. 33, n. 2004, p.1 - 26, 2004. 4$ V //

-) ) / $ - / JJ1/ ?/*-4

-! /2 $ - / - -2 $ -*00.) W)

4 *0 ) *0+3)

LIAO, Y.-S. The effect of human resource management control systems on the relationship between knowledge management strategy and firm performance.

International Journal of Manpower, v. 32, n. 5, p. 494-511, 2011. ISSN 01437720.

4$ V // ) /+0)++0,/0+.JRR*+++++3,+R0W) 4

*0 ) *0+3)

LIN, H.-F. A multi-stage analysis of antecedents and consequences of knowledge

management evolution. Journal of Knowledge Management, v. 18, n. 1, p. 52 - 74,

2014. ISSN 13673270. 4$ V // ) /+0)++0,/D

-0R-*0+J-0*R,W) 4 *0 ) *0+3)

A\ 7#-8& 9A] ( ) 729^9- 72 ]8( ]) A) ?

( $ ) @ D

@ ) v. 31, n. 6, p. 502-509, 2011. ISSN 0268-4012.

4$ V // >) ) /+0)+0+1/!) ! )*0++)0*)00JW)

4 *0 ) *0+3)

48#48427 ( ) D) ) H\ 7#( ) H) 7 _

$ -A ) ;

> ) @ 2 5 ; H 2 I

2 ( v. 16, n. 1, p. 31-54, 2010. ISSN 1135-2523. 4$

V // >) ) /+0)+0+1/ ++J3-*3*J5+*=1000*-+W) 4 *0

) *0+3)

7@24A&48( H) 7) ) :

? $ 4 & )

@ D . ! ) v. 11, n. 1, p. 195-207, 2012.

(23)

$ % & '" ( $)*+( )*( )+,,-*+.( )/! ) *0+1 ( &

V // ) ) / J/ ) [ Y*+,RR<<W)

4 *0 ) *0+3)

&AA ( 4) ) &:@( :) 4)

4 $ ) D ( v.

15, n. 1, p. 156-171, 2011. ISSN 13673270. 4$

V // ) /+0)++0,/+J1RJ*R+++++0,R31W) 4 *0 )

*0+3)

&248 4( ) ) A77( D)-8) A77( D)-@) ?

K ? $

$ ) @ F ( v.

48, n. 8, p. 382-392, 2011. ISSN 0378-7206. 4$

V // >) ) /+0)+0+1/!) )*0++)+0)00*W) 4 *0 ) *0+3)

877AG( 4) 1 A )

A ( ; ; $ ( *00*) 4$

V // ? ) ) ) / ? Y E YE Y+ &7 QG>3 E Y

E Y 2<E CY8 (T4)T5*00*=)TF T T

T: T T )T T T; $ T E

Y ;B ;, E Y [J 3 , D C @< ? 8F! .JC Q?W) 4 *0

) *0+3)

877AG( 4) H27H92G( ) A4:: ( )

$ ) @ D

8 F . ( v. 15, n. 4, p. 80-116, 1995. 4$

V // ) ) / / /+0)++0,/0+..J3R03+01JJ1J<W

) 4 *0 ) *0+3)

89A &&&( @) 4) F) A ? ?

) D @ + ( v. 13, n. 1, p. 16-38,

2012. ISSN 14691930. 4$

V // ) /+0)++0,/+.1<+<J+*+++<1+<1W) 4 *0 ) *0+3)

`27#-A\ 7#( ) 4A7H27( D) & (

? ) @

5 v. 112, n. 4, p. 644-662, 2012. ISSN 02635577. 4$

V // ) /+0)++0,/0*1J33R+*++**33*+W) 4 *0 )

*0+3)

249( G) H;9( ) @) @78( G) & ( ?

( ) @ D /

@ ( v. 23, n. 2, p. 106-127, 2014. ISSN 18347649.

4$ V // ) /+0)++0,/&D4& -++-*0+J-0010W) 4

*0 ) *0+3)

29FA7 ( 6) ) : $

? - ) " ( v. 42, n. 4, p. 554-568, 2013. ISSN

0368492X. 4$ V // ) /+0)++0,/ -0+-*0+J-00+.W

(24)

$ % & '" ( $)*+( )*( )+,,-*+.( )/! ) *0+1 (

@978@722( :) H2& &:@( ) 4) @48 24( 4)

> ? )

D 1 ( v. 35, n. 2, p. 121-135, 2014. ISSN 07353766.

4$ V // ) /+0)++++/! )+*0.*W) 4 *0 )

*0+3)

COMBS, J. G.; CROOK, T. R.; SHOOK, C. L. :

) ! ( v. 2, n. 5, p.

259 286, 2005. 4$

Vhttp://www.emeraldinsight.com/doi/abs/10.1016/S1479-8387(05)02011-4W)

4 *0 ) *0+3)

&6424 4 2& @848( ) )

? ?

$ ) @ D ( v. 6, n. 3, p.

1-21, 2010. ISSN 15480666. 4$

V // ) /+0).0+,/!? )*0+00R0+0+W) 4 *0 ) *0+3)

A46 96&I( ) F4F&I( 6) ( $ $ (

$ ) 2 / ( v. 58,

n. 199, p. 85-108, 2013. ISSN 00133264. 4$

V // ) /+0)**<,/7 4+J<<0,3 W) 4 *0 ) *0+3)

;H@7&2( D) @48( ) @) @4 48( &) $ $

$ 4 $ $ ?

) @222 2 ( v. 59, n. 4, p.

530-539, 2012. ISSN 00189391. 4$

V // ) /+0)++0</:7 )*0++)*+13R*1W) 4 *0 ) *0+3)

:4F2&#&( 2) ) 7F24@& &( 8) 4A- 42B4&( ) 4) 9

) . + ( v. 3, p. 684-690,

2011. 4$

V // ) ) / / / / +,RR030<+000.,<,W)

4 *0 ) *0+3)

:;F&H&( ) 4A @4B&( ) : ?

: )

D 2 @ v. 28, n. 2, p. 267-285, 2015.

ISSN 17410398. 4$ V // ) /+0)++0,/D7&

-0+-*0+.-000JW) 4 *0 ) *0+3)

64 429( 4) 4278:7( 2) 67A9 9( ) )

: ( & -9 2 ( & $

) ( + ( v. 77, n. 7, p.

1076 - 1089, 2010. ISSN 0040-1625. 4$

V // >) ) /+0)+0+1/!) )*0+0)0*)001W) 4 *0 )

*0+3)

B48H( #) B48H( 8) ( $

) 2 / ( v. 39, n. 10, p. 8899 - 8908,

(25)

$ % & '" ( $)*+( )*( )+,,-*+.( )/! ) *0+1 ( (

V // >) ) /+0)+0+1/!) )*0+*)0*)0+RW) 4 *0 )

*0+3)

B;( &)-A) @78( D)-A) 4 - a&:b $

aF b 4 L L

$ ) ( + ( v. 88, n. 0, p.

76- 90, 2014. ISSN 0040-1625. 4$

V // >) ) /+0)+0+1/!) )*0+.)01)0+3W) 4 *0 )

*0+3)

G48H( )- ) 42A9B( ) F) A;( )- )

) ! . 2A

! ( v. 45, n. 6, p. 893 - 903, 2009. ISSN 1366-5545.

4$ V // >) ) /+0)+0+1/!) )*00<)03)00JW) 4

*0 ) *0+3)

#4 ( ) 778( D) &8H@( )

> ) D

( v. 13, n. 6, p. 392 - 409, 2009. 4$

V // ) ) / / /+0)++0,/+J1RJ*R0<+0<<R0,,

W) 4 *0 ) *0+3)

#48 ( ) ) 7 4

7 2 & $ ) In: AMERICAS CONFERENCE ON

INFORMATION SYSTEMS 2010, 16., AMCIS 2010) . J 2010. v. 7, p.

5369-5386. ISBN 978-1-61738-952-8. 4$

V // ) ) ?/ / /11+.*R1) W) 4 *0 )

*0+3)

APPENDIX A – List of Analyzed Papers

Paper Reference 200

9 2 0 1 0 2 0 1 1 2 0 1 2 2 0 1 3 2 0 1 4 2 0 1 5 T o ta l

Intellectual capital and new product development (C.-J. Chen, Liu, Chu, &

Hsiao, 2014) 1 1

Knowledge evolution strategies and organizational performance: A strategic fit analysis

(D.-N. Chen & Liang, 2011)

1 1

Measuring knowledge management performance using a competitive perspective: An empirical study

(M.-Y. Chen et al., 2009)

1 1

Assessing the impact of knowledge management strategies announcements on the market value of firms

(Choi & Jong, 2010)

1 1

Knowledge management capabilities and firm performance: A test of universalistic, contingency and complementarity perspectives

(Cohen & Olsen, 2015)

1 1 Capital markets valuation and accounting performance of

Most Admired Knowledge Enterprise (MAKE) award winners

(DeFond, Konchitchki, McMullin, & O’Leary,

2013) 1 1

A comparative analysis of machine learning systems for measuring the impact of knowledge management practices

(Delen, Zaim, Kuzey, & Zaim, 2013)

1 1

Intellectual capital in business-to-business markets (Erickson & Rothberg,

2009) 1 1

Knowledge assets in services across industries and across time

(Erickson & Rothberg,

(26)

$ % & '" ( $)*+( )*( )+,,-*+.( )/! ) *0+1 ( +

An elusive antecedent of superior firm performance: The knowledge management factor

(Holsapple & Wu, 2011)

1 1

Strategic knowledge management, innovation and performance

(López-Nicolás &

Meroño-Cerdán, 2011) 1 1 ESTRATEGIA DE GESTION DEL CONOCIMIENTO Y

ACTITUD INNOVADORA EN EMPRESAS DE CASTILLA-LA MANCHA. UN ESTUDIO EXPLORATORIO

(Manzanares & Gómez, 2010)

1 1

Stocks and flows underlying organizations’ knowledge management capability: Synergistic versus contingent complementarities over time

(Miranda, Lee, & Lee, 2011)

1 1

Paper Reference

2 0 0 9 2 0 1 0 2 0 1 1 2 0 1 2 2 0 1 3 2 0 1 4 2 0 1 5 T o ta l

Knowledge Management Tools, Inter-Organizational Relationships, Innovation and Firm Performance

(Vaccaro, Parente, & Veloso, 2010)

1 1

Knowledge sharing, innovation and firm performance (Wang & Wang, 2012) 1 1 A stage-based diffusion of IT innovation and the BSC

performance impact: A moderator of technology– organization–environment

(Wu & Chen, 2014)

1 1 Knowledge management enablers in liner shipping (Yang et al., 2009) 1 1 Knowledge management and organizational performance:

an exploratory analysis

(Zack et al., 2009)

1

1 A new integrated knowledge model in supplier selection: The

case of an Asian automotive supply chain

(Akhavan, Elahi, & Jafari, 2014)

1 1 Does knowledge management really matter? Linking

knowledge management practices, competitiveness and economic performance

(Andreeva & Kianto, 2012)

1 1

A multidimensional view of intellectual capital: The impact on organizational performance

(Asiaei & Jusoh, 2015)

1 1 Intangible asset management framework: An empirical

evidence

(Chareonsuk &

Chansa-Ngavej, 2008) 1 1 Determinants of knowledge management with information

technology support impact on firm performance

(Chuang, Liao, & Lin, 2013)

1 1

How does organizational structure influence performance through learning and innovation in Austria and China

(Hao, Kasper, & Muehlbacher, 2012)

1 1

The relationship between knowledge management enablers and performance

(Ho, 2009)

1 1

Relationship between Intellectual Capital and Knowledge Management: An Empirical Investigation

(Hsu & Sabherwal, 2012)

1 1

The impact of market orientation on knowledge management: An empirical investigation in China

(Hu, 2010)

1 1

Segmenting knowledge management (KM) practitioners and its relationship to performance variation – Some empirical evidence

(Joshi et al., 2014)

1 1

Paper Reference

2 0 0 9 2 0 1 0 2 0 1 1 2 0 1 2 2 0 1 3 2 0 1 4 2 0 1 5 T o ta l

Organisational learning and competitive advantage: Testing for the interacting influence of knowledge management and innovation

(Kamya, Ntayi, & Ahiauzu, 2011)

1 1

On the role of partners in a multi-disciplinary business network: A knowledge management perspective

(Karjalainen & Valtakoski, 2010)

1 1

The impact of knowledge management practices on organizational performance

(Kianto, Ritala, Vanhala, & Inkinen,

2013) 1 1

The effect of human resource management control systems on the relationship between knowledge management strategy and firm performance

(Liao, 2011)

(27)

$ % & '" ( $)*+( )*( )+,,-*+.( )/! ) *0+1 ( ,

A multi-stage analysis of antecedents and consequences of knowledge management evolution

(Lin, 2014)

1 1 The impact of intellectual capital efficiency on market value:

An empirical study from Iranian pharmaceutical companies

(Mehralian, Rasekh, Akhavan, & Sadeh,

2012) 1 1

Knowledge management and organizational performance: A decomposed view

(Mills & Smith, 2011)

1 1

Linking knowledge processes with firm performance: Organizational culture

(Nold III, 2012)

1 1

Information technology competency, knowledge processes and firm performance

(Pérez-López & Alegre, 2012)

1 1

Information systems maturity, knowledge sharing, and firm performance

(Rao, Guo, & Chen, 2014)

1 1 The impact of social media to value added in

knowledge-based industries

(Roblek, Bach, Meško, & Bertoncelj, 2013)

1 1

Knowledge management in supply chains: The role of explicit and tacit knowledge

(Schoenherr, Griffith, & Chandra, 2014)

1 1 Critical success factors and outcomes of market knowledge

management: A conceptual model and empirical evidence

(Sivaramakrishnan, Delbaere, Zhang, &

Bruning, 2010) 1 1

Knowledge management, innovativeness, and organizational performance: Evidence from Serbia

(Slavkovi & Babi , 2013)

1 1

Paper Reference

2 0 0 9 2 0 1 0 2 0 1 1 2 0 1 2 2 0 1 3 2 0 1 4 2 0 1 5 T o ta l

Diversification and innovation revisited: An absorptive capacity view of technological knowledge creation

(Sugheir, Phan, & Hasan, 2012)

1 1

The impact of knowledge management processes on organisational performance: The case of the airline industry

(Tubigi & Alshawi, 2015)

Referências

Documentos relacionados

Os processos com inova¸c˜ oes α-est´ aveis apresentam a caracter´ıstica de ter variˆ ancia infinita, al´ em da propriedade de longa dependˆ encia4. Apresentamos um estudo te´

If writing a piece of fiction involves “inventing” a world “that has no reality outside the pages of the book,” it nevertheless bears two crucial likenesses to that reality: it

Segundo Consolaro (2002) existem vários aspectos a serem tomados para uma prevenção da reabsorção radicular externa durante movimentos ortodônticos, mas quando falamos de

Tal é a atitude expressa de Dagfinn Follesdal (1997), para quem a filosofia analítica não pode ser definida por teses e problemas comuns nem por um método compartilhado, mas

Nesse contexto, o presente artigo tem como objetivo geral identificar as práticas de inovação da gestão pública presentes na transição dos modelos de

10.1) Dique/Barreira de contenção: Estruturas que barram o efluente, impedindo que atinjam o corpo hídrico mais próximo. 10.2) Tanque/Bacia de decantação: Atuam como um

1. Para Milgram, conclusões morais da experiência, são de que elas engendram compreensão e simpatia mais profundas para com os perpetradores banais do mal, ao mesmo

• A simulação pedagógica é uma técnica que contribui eficazmente para o aperfeiçoamento das performances pedagógicas do formando como futuro formador; • Através da filmagem