• Nenhum resultado encontrado

Appendix A Option Valuation Formulas

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2019

Share "Appendix A Option Valuation Formulas"

Copied!
10
0
0

Texto

(1)

Appendix A

Option Valuation Formulas

A.1

Discrete Average Price Asian Call

It is possible to value asian options using regular BS model’s option pricing formulas if we assume the average priceSavg to have a log-normal distribution just like a regular

price series. A geometric price average however does follow a log-normal distribution, while an arithmetic average follows a log-normal distribution approximately.

If that is the case and we take the average price series to be log-normal, there is an adjustment [10] that can be made to the Black-Scholes futures option pricing formula in (A.3), which yields the price of a continuously average price asian option. However in this case, since we are only considering close price series in testing simulations, we are interested to choose the time instants at which the average is calculated. There is a formula to do it, however an extra step is required since we are valuing the options with passed averaging observations that will contribute as well to the final option payoff. This is possible by adjusting the strike according to the price average ¯Sverified in the periodt1

that have passed [11], as in:

K∗=t1+t2 t2

Kt1 t2

¯

S (A.1)

where K is the actual strike of the asian option and t2 is the period of time left until

maturity. According to the value of K∗ different pricing formulas (A.2) and (A.3) are used:

CK∗≤0= t2 t1+t2

(M1−K∗)e−rt2 (A.2) CK∗>0= [F0N(d1)−K∗N(d2)]e−rt2 (A.3)

These formulas require the variable adjustments described below:

F0=M1 , M1=

1

m m

i=1

Fi , Fi=Ste(r− δt)Ti

(2)

A.1. DISCRETE AVERAGE PRICE ASIAN CALL

the current priceSt to nextith observation. d1=

ln

F0

K∗

22t2

σ√t2 , d2=d1−σt2 , σ

2= 1 Tln

M2 M12

M2= 1 m2

m

i=1

Fi2eσi2Ti+2 m

j=1 j1

i=1

FiFjeσi2Ti

!

A.1.1

Vanilla Call

C=Se−δTN(d1)Ke−rTN(d2) (A.4)

d1=

ln KS+rδ+σ2

2

T

σ√T , d2=d1−σ

√ T

A.1.2

Binary Call

The binary call formula is just the discountedCoupontimes the probabilityN(d2)of being paid.

C=Coupon×e−rTN(d2) (A.5)

A.1.3

Up-and-In Call

As one could tell by looking at Fig.(3.1) the european Up-and-In option used in this work has can be thought as composed by a OTM binary option plus a OTM vanilla call option with strikeH >K. Since the BS model assumes constant volatility, the volatility used can be the same as the one used for the ATM vanilla and binary call. Normally when pricing OTM or ITM options one would have to increase volatility due to the volatility smile.

C=Se−δTN(d1)He−rTN(d2) + (HK)e−rTN(d2) =Se−δTN(d1)Ke−rTN(d2)

(A.6)

d1=

ln HS+rδ+σ2

2

T

σ√T , d2=d1−σ

(3)

Appendix B

Experimental Results Figures

The following graphs support chapter 4. All graphs units in thex-axis are expressed in days, and iny-axis expressed in absolute values, unless stated otherwise. As for the price series a generic price of 100 was chosen forS0, as one can tell by looking at the graphs.

Some graphs will contain twoy series, which although having different scales share the same unit. Apart from the caption, below each graph one also can find the reference to the table containing the information for that particular test, if there is one, as well as the parameters used for the test, which if absent were set to zero.

(4)

Figure B.2: Average daily price and Delta Hedging PnL w/σ =10% andr=0.5%

Price(Left Axis);Asian;Vanilla;Binary;UpAndIn(Right Axis); Table (C.2)

Figure B.3: Average daily price and Delta Hedging PnL w/σ =25% andr=1.0%

Price(Left Axis);Asian;Vanilla;Binary;UpAndIn(Right Axis); Table (C.3)

Figure B.4: Average daily deltas w/σ=25% andr=1.0%

(5)

Figure B.5: Average option and underlying price w/σ =20%,r=1.0% andδ =4.0%

Price(Left Axis);Asian;Vanilla;Binary;UpAndIn(Right Axis); Table (C.4)

Figure B.6: Real Annual Interest Rate that would be used in a 2 year Option started at 02/01/2014.yvalues in percentage points.

Figure B.7: Average price and Hedging PnL w/σ =10%,r=real

(6)

Figure B.8: Average price and Hedging PnL w/σ =10%,rinverse trend of real

Price(Left Axis);Asian;Vanilla;Binary;UpAndIn(Right Axis); Table (C.6)

Figure B.9: Average price and Hedging PnL w/σ =10%,rinverse trend of real

Price(Left Axis);Asian;Vanilla;Binary;UpAndIn(Right Axis); Table (C.7)

Figure B.10: Volatility series and Hedging PnL w/σ=real,r=1%

(7)

Figure B.11: Average Price and Delta series w/σ =real,r=1%

Price(Left Axis);Asian;Vanilla;Binary;UpAndInDeltas (Right Axis); Table (C.8)

Figure B.12: Close up of Fig.(B.10)

Volatility(Left Axis);Asian;Vanilla;Binary;UpAndIn(Right Axis);

Figure B.13: t-distributionwith 5 degrees of freedom;

(8)

Appendix C

Experimental Results Tables

The following tables support chapter 4. The tables mostly contain figures regarding averages, annualised standard deviations, maximum and minimum values expressed in basis points, unless stated otherwise. Values for Kurtosis and Skewness are unitless.

Average STD Max Min Asian 1.07 1.53 0.59 -5.64 Vanilla 0.03 0.02 0.01 -0.07 Binary 0.03 0.02 0.02 -0.08 UpAndIn 0.03 0.06 0.09 -0.17

Table C.1: Option princing difference between Closed Formula and Monte Carlo.

σ =10%,r=0.5% andT =520

Average STD Kurtosis Skewness Max Min Asian 0.18 10.79 60.09 4.45 9.25 -0.56 Vanilla 0.22 11.70 22.62 3.34 9.93 -0.55 Binary 0.14 12.12 25.11 1.79 11.97 -10.05 UpAndIn 0.28 31.98 38.66 4.26 36.88 -12.40

Table C.2: Delta Hedging PnL.

σ =10%,r=0.5% andT =520

Average STD Kurtosis Skewness Max Min Asian 0.48 44.91 31.53 3.82 36.68 -2.58 Vanilla 0.59 48.65 21.02 3.31 39.01 -2.45 Binary 0.38 44.74 25.89 2.23 42.05 -33.72 UpAndIn 0.76 131.29 37.80 4.24 141.99 -40.22

Table C.3: Delta Hedging PnL.

(9)

Dividends 4 2 Asian 40.38 37.96 Vanilla 50.63 37.55 Binary 29.30 22.09 UpAndIn 66.62 49.08

Table C.4: Average Delta Hedging PnL without and with dividend cuts.

σ=20%,r=1.0%,T =260,δ =4.0%

Average STD Kurtosis Skewness Max Min Asian 0.00 10.63 69.26 4.76 8.93 -0.77 Vanilla 0.02 11.28 22.59 3.30 9.28 -0.77 Binary 0.02 12.42 26.81 1.45 12.13 -11.12 UpAndIn 0.02 34.32 37.76 4.04 39.00 -14.84

Table C.5: Delta Hedging PnL.

σ=10%,T =520, andr=real

Average STD Kurtosis Skewness Max Min Asian 0.11 10.63 66.08 4.80 9.11 -0.65 Vanilla 0.11 11.49 23.15 3.36 9.63 -0.66 Binary 0.07 12.11 26.08 1.55 11.81 -10.72 UpAndIn 0.14 33.04 36.46 4.03 36.98 -13.44

Table C.6: Delta Hedging PnL.

σ =10%,T =520, andrequal to the inverse trend of real

Average STD Kurtosis Skewness Max Min Asian -0.95 18.71 11.60 -1.33 7.86 -8.13 Vanilla -0.94 19.74 6.60 -0.38 8.46 -8.19 Binary -0.79 23.13 7.23 -1.09 10.21 -14.39 UpAndIn -2.12 62.71 8.56 -1.00 32.18 -35.08

Table C.7: Delta Hedging PnL with 1 basis point bid-ask spread.

σ =10%,T =520, andrequal to the inverse trend of real

Average STD Kurtosis Skewness Max Min Asian 5.27 271.28 32.24 3.57 223.63 -17.26 Vanilla 6.59 325.70 26.80 3.07 289.33 -22.12 Binary 1.95 365.60 12.23 1.15 124.66 -87.21 UpAndIn 10.34 892.03 30.64 2.81 645.78 -151.61

Table C.8: Delta Hedging PnL with real volatility series.

(10)

Average STD Kurtosis Skewness Max Min Asian 0.43 27.16 530.86 15.31 66.44 -0.57 Vanilla 0.49 29.60 305.00 12.29 71.80 -0.55 Binary 0.16 26.96 341.52 6.16 61.28 -51.77 UpAndIn 0.79 77.62 450.13 14.45 213.12 -43.77

Table C.9: Delta Hedging PnL with t-distributed returns.

σ =10%,r=0.5% andT =520

Average STD Kurtosis Skewness Max Min Asian -37.13 681.85 32.27 3.79 36.71 -283.39 Vanilla -58.09 926.47 20.22 3.22 39.18 -446.19 Binary -31.07 323.94 25.99 2.11 41.71 -85.97 UpAndIn -81.59 1974.38 34.88 4.08 148.37 -804.57

Table C.10: Delta Hedging PnL with a negative price shock.

Imagem

Figure B.1: Example of Simulated Paths with σ and r respectfully equal to 5%, 0%; 20%, 1%; and 10%, − 0.5% for the remainders.
Figure B.2: Average daily price and Delta Hedging PnL w/ σ = 10% and r = − 0.5%
Figure B.6: Real Annual Interest Rate that would be used in a 2 year Option started at 02/01/2014
Figure B.8: Average price and Hedging PnL w/ σ = 10%, r inverse trend of real Price (Left Axis); Asian; Vanilla; Binary; UpAndIn (Right Axis); Table (C.6)
+5

Referências

Documentos relacionados

The following sections will present a discussion regarding the support for standard OpenFlow services and for the real-time extensions herein proposed on data plane networks

(24) Membros do GRAPPA concordaram que a ecografia é não só mais sensível que o exame clínico na deteção de entesite, como também pode demonstrar várias

6 High Energy Physics Division, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne IL, United States of America. 7 Department of Physics, University of Arizona, Tucson AZ, United States

Para cumprir este objectivo, analisámos a acção do Estado no plano das relações entre os trabalhadores e o patronato, sobretudo no caso das relações de

A cartografia de pormenor dos séculos XVI e XVII representa a área a jusante da Ponte das Barcas como um extenso areal, onde serpenteia o rio Alcoa (ou de Alcobaça) que comunica com

Foi constatado que a interdisciplinaridade possibilita um diálogo entre as diferentes áreas do conhecimento, reduzindo o distanciamento entre o que está presente

A relação interveniente do desenvolvimento territorial está vinculada aos ativos territoriais (Capital humano e intelectual, Capital social, Capital cultural, Capital natural

In this presentation, I will describe the HiDimDA (High Dimensional Discriminant Analysis) R package, available on CRAN, that implements several routines and