• Nenhum resultado encontrado

Rev. Bras. Anestesiol. vol.65 número5

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2018

Share "Rev. Bras. Anestesiol. vol.65 número5"

Copied!
4
0
0

Texto

(1)

RevBrasAnestesiol.2015;65(5):349---352

REVISTA

BRASILEIRA

DE

ANESTESIOLOGIA

Official Publication of the Brazilian Society of Anesthesiology

www.sba.com.br

SCIENTIFIC

ARTICLE

Effectiveness

of

sub-Tenon’s

block

in

pediatric

strabismus

surgery

Kasim

Tuzcu

a,∗

,

Mesut

Coskun

b

,

Esra

Ayhan

Tuzcu

b

,

Murat

Karcioglu

a

,

Isil

Davarci

a

,

Sedat

Hakimoglu

a

,

Suzan

Aydın

a

,

Selim

Turhanoglu

a

aDepartmentofAnesthesiologyandReanimation,MedicalFacultyoftheMustafaKemalUniversity,Hatay,Turkey

bDepartmentofOphthalmology,MedicalFacultyoftheMustafaKemalUniversity,Hatay,Turkey

Received27November2013;accepted5February2014 Availableonline11March2014

KEYWORDS

Sub-Tenon’sblock; Pediatricstrabismus surgery;

Anesthesia

Abstract

Backgroundandobjectives: Strabismussurgeryisafrequentlyperformedpediatricocular pro-cedure.Afrequentlyoccurringmajorprobleminpatientsreceivingthistreatmentinvolvesthe oculocardiacreflex.Thisreflexisassociatedwithanincreasedincidenceofpostoperative nau-sea,vomiting,andpain.Theaimofthisstudywastoinvestigatetheeffectsofasub-Tenon’s blockontheoculocardiacreflex,pain,andpostoperativenauseaandvomiting.

Methods:Forty patients aged 5---16years with American Society ofAnesthesiologistsstatus I---IIundergoingelectivestrabismussurgerywereincludedinthisstudy.Patientsincludedwere randomly assignedinto two groups byusing asealed envelopemethod. Ingroup 1(n=20), patientsdidnotreceivesub-Tenon’sanesthesia.Ingroup2(n=20),followingintubation, sub-Tenon’sanesthesiawasperformedwiththeeyeundergoingsurgery.Atropineuse,painscores, oculocardiacreflex,andpostoperativenauseaandvomitingincidenceswerecomparedbetween groups.

Results:There were no significantdifferences between groups with regard tooculocardiac reflexandatropineuse(p>0.05).Painscores30minpost-surgeryweresignificantlylowerin group2thaningroup1(p<0.05).Additionalanalgesicneededduringthepostoperativeperiod wassignificantlyloweringroup2comparedtogroup1(p<0.05).

Conclusions: Inconclusion,wethinkthatasub-Tenon’sblock,combinedwithgeneral anesthe-sia,isnoteffectiveandreliableindecreasingoculocardiacreflexandpostoperativenausea andvomiting. However, thismethodis safe forreducing postoperative painanddecreasing additionalanalgesiarequiredinpediatricstrabismussurgery.

© 2014SociedadeBrasileirade Anestesiologia.Publishedby ElsevierEditoraLtda.Allrights reserved.

Correspondingauthor.

E-mail:[email protected](K.Tuzcu).

0104-0014/$–seefrontmatter©2014SociedadeBrasileiradeAnestesiologia.PublishedbyElsevierEditoraLtda.Allrightsreserved.

(2)

350 K.Tuzcuetal.

PALAVRAS-CHAVE

Bloqueio subtenoniano; Cirurgiade estrabismo pediátrico; Anestesia

Eficáciadobloqueiosubtenonianoemcirurgiadeestrabismopediátrico

Resumo

Justificativaeobjetivo:A cirurgia de estrabismoé um procedimento oftalmológico comum em pediatria. Umgrande problemaque ocorrecomfrequência em pacientessubmetidos a essetratamentoenvolveoreflexooculocardíaco.Essereflexoestáassociadoao aumentoda incidênciadenáusea,vômitoedor.Oobjetivodesteestudofoiinvestigarosefeitosdo blo-queio subtenoniano sobre o reflexo oculocardíaco, a dor, anáusea e o vômito no período pós-operatório.

Métodos: Foramincluídosnoestudo40pacientesentre5-16anos,estadofísicoASAI-II, sub-metidos àcirurgia eletivade estrabismo.Foramrandomicamentealocados em doisgrupos, comométododeenvelopelacrado.NoGrupo1(n=20),pacientesnãoreceberambloqueio sub-tenoniano.NoGrupo 2(n=20),apósaintubac¸ão,obloqueiosubtenonianofoifeitonoolho submetidoàcirurgia.Usodeatropina,escoresdedor,reflexooculocardíacoeincidênciade náuseaevômitoforamcomparados.

Resultados: Nãohouvediferenc¸a significativaentreos grupos em relac¸ãoao reflexo oculo-cardíacoeaousodeatropina(p>0,05).Osescoresdedorem30minutosdepós-operatório foramsignificativamentemenoresnoGrupo2doquenoGrupo1(p<0,05).Anecessidadede analgésicoadicionalduranteoperíodopós-operatóriofoisignificativamentemenornoGrupo2 doquenoGrupo1(p<0,05).

Conclusões:Obloqueiosubtenoniano,emcombinac¸ãocomanestesiageral,nãoéeficaze con-fiávelparadiminuiroreflexooculocardíaco,bemcomonáuseaevômitopós-operatórios(NVPO). Porém,essemétodoéseguroparadiminuiradornoperíodopós-operatórioereduziraanalgesia adicionalnecessáriaemcirurgiadeestrabismopediátrico.

©2014SociedadeBrasileiradeAnestesiologia.PublicadoporElsevierEditoraLtda.Todosos direitosreservados.

Introduction

Strabismussurgeryisoneofthemostfrequentlyperformed pediatric ocular operations.1 However, it can cause

unfa-vorablesideeffectsduringintraoperativeandpostoperative periods.Typically,themajorproblemsassociatedwith

stra-bismussurgeriesincludeincreasedriskoftheoculocardiac

reflex (32---90%). This reflex may occur in response to a

retractionoftheextra-ocularmusclesandisassociatedwith

anincreasedpostoperativenauseaandvomiting(PONV)

inci-dence(46---85%)resultingfromtheoculometricreflex.2---4

Inthepediatricpopulation,anotherimportantproblem

is postoperative pain management. Because of potential

side effects, opiates and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory

drugsshouldbeusedcautiouslyinthesecases,particularly

in outpatient surgeries. In recent years, regional

anes-thesiatechniques havebeen recommendedinconjunction

withgeneralanesthesia.5---8Sub-Tenon’sblockisoneofthe

regionalanesthetictechniquesusedinocular surgery.This

techniqueinvolveslocalanestheticsbeinginjectedposterior toTenon’scapsule.

In thisstudy, we aimedto investigate theeffects of a

sub-Tenon’sblock on theoculocardiac reflex(OCR), pain,

andpostoperativenauseaandvomiting(PONV).

Methods

Forty patients aged 5---16 years with AmericanSociety of

Anesthesiologists(ASA)physicalstatusI---IIundergoing

elec-tive strabismus surgery were included in this study. All

the parents were informed and gave their written

con-sent. Ethical approval for this study wasprovided by the

localEthicsCommittee.Patientswithanocular pathology

other than strabismus, patients allergic tothe anesthetic

agent,and childrenwithout communicationabilities were

excluded. During the preanesthesia evaluation, children

wereencouragedtoreportpostoperativepain,ifpresent.

Forpremedication,0.5mg/kgmidazolaminaparticle-free

fruitjuicewasorallygiventoallpatients1hbeforesurgery.

Anesthesia induction wasachievedby 2.5mg/kg propofol,

1␮g/kgfentanyl,and0.6mg/kgrocuronium.Patientswere

intubatedtosecuretheirairway.Anesthesiawasmaintained

by2---3%sevofluraneina50%:50%(v/v)O2toairmixture.No

additionalfentanyldosewasused.Sevoflurane

concentra-tion wasincreasedby 0.5% when an increase higher than

20%, comparedtobaseline values,occurred in heart rate

and meanarterial pressure (MAP).End-tidal CO2 pressure

wasmaintainedbetween30and35mmHgduringsurgery.

Thepatientswererandomlyassignedintotwogroupsby

usingasealedenvelopemethod.Ingroup1(n=20),patients didnotreceivesub-Tenon’sanesthesia.Ingroup2(n=20),

followingintubation,sub-Tenon’sanesthesiawasperformed

withtheeyeundergoingsurgery.Sub-Tenon’sanesthesiawas

performed with 5% bupivacaine (0.08ml/kg). Under

ster-ile conditions, a 19-gauge curved, blunt metallic cannula

(25mm) wasinsertedintosub-Tenon’sspaceandthelocal

anestheticwasinjected.Surgerybegan5minafterthe

sub-Tenon’sinjection.

Allpatientsweremonitoredfor heartrate,blood

pres-sure, peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2), and end-tidal

(3)

Sub-Tenon’sblockinstrabismussurgery 351

Table1 Demographicdataofthepatients.

Group1 Group2 p

Age(years) 9(5---16) 11(5---16) 0.743 Weight(kg) 33.5(14---65) 38.5(17---65) 0.597 Gender(M/F) 8/12 10/10 0.525 Totalmuscles(1/2/3) 2/15/3 2/16/2 0.739 Operationtimes 75(30---150) 67.5(60---135) 0.735

5min. OCRwasconsidered anacuteincrease, higherthan 20%,inheartrateoranacutedecreaseinheartratebelow 60beats/min. In the case of OCR in this study,the surgi-calstimuluswaswithdrawn. Ifapatientdid notrespond, atropinewasgiven.Intraoperativefollow-upwasperformed by an anesthesiologist blinded tostudy groups. Paraceta-mol(15mg/kg,i.v.)wasgiventoallpatients15minbefore completion of the operation. When the operations were completed, patients were extubated by an antagonizing neuromuscular block with neostigmin and atropine. Pain, nausea,andvomitingwereassessedat 30minandat1,2, 4,and6haftersurgery.

Postoperative follow-up was performed by clinicians blinded to study groups. Postoperative pain was assessed by using a verbal pain scale (0=no pain; 1=mild pain; 2=moderate pain; 3=severe pain; 4=very severe pain). Additionalanalgesicdoses(ibuprofen,10mg/kg,p.o.)were giventopatientswithpainat amoderateor higherlevel. NumericscoringwasusedforPONV(0=nonausea;1=nausea ispresent,butnovomiting;3=vomitingoncewithin30min; 4=vomitingtwoormoretimeswithin30min).Ondansetron (0.1mg/kg,i.v.)wasgivenincasesofvomiting.

SPSS for Windows, version 15.0, wasused for statisti-calanalysis.Bothdescriptiveandanalyticalstatisticswere used.Chi-square/Fischer’stestswereusedforcomparisons betweencategoricalvariables.Normaldistributionsof con-tinuousvariables weretested witha Kolmogorov---Smirnov test.Mann-Whitney Utestswereusedtocomparemedian valuesbetweengroups. Statisticalsignificancewas consid-eredasp<0.05forallstatisticalanalysis.

Results

Inthisstudy,40patientswereassignedtooneoftwogroups with 20 patients per group. There were no significant differencesbetweengroupsregardingage,gender,weight, number of muscles operated on, and operation times (p>0.05).DemographicdataareshowninTable1.

AlthoughtheOCRdevelopedinfewerpatientsingroup2

(n=7)comparedtogroup1(n=10),therewasnosignificant

3 4

2

1

0

V

e

rbal r

a

ting scale

30 min 1 h 2 h 4 h 6 h

Group I

Group II

Time

Figure1 Postoperativeverbalratingscale.

difference between groups (p>0.05). There was also no

significant difference in atropine use due to the OCR

betweengroups(p>0.05;Table2).

AlthoughPONVwasobservedinfewerpatientsingroup2,

therewasnosignificantdifferenceinPONVscoresbetween

thegroups (p>0.05).Ingroup1,therewasnauseainfour

andvomiting insevenpatients,whereasingroup 2,there

wasnausea in two patients and vomiting in two patients

(Table2).

Whenpainscores30minaftersurgerywereconsidered,

painscoresweresignificantlyloweringroup2thaningroup 1(p<0.05)(Fig.1).Additionalanalgesic needsduringthe

postoperative period were significantly lower in group 2

compared to group 1 (p<0.05). Fifteen patients needed

additionalanalgesicdosesingroup1,whileonlysixpatients

neededadditionalanalgesicdosesingroup2.

Discussion

Regionalanesthesiaisusedasanadjunct togeneral

anes-thesia in children. Several studies have reported that

preoperative regional blocks reduce the need for

intra-operative anesthetic and opiates, and it contributes to

postoperative analgesia.9---12 In ophthalmological surgery,

severaltypesofregionalblocksareusedincluding

peribul-bar, retrobulbar, and sub-Tenon’s blocks. However, in

peribulbarandretrobulbarblocks,systemiclife-threatening

complications or ocular complications may occur. These

conditions may include subarachnoid, intravenous local

anestheticsinjections,ocularcomplications,suchasglobe

perforation, nerve injury, and retrobulbar hemorrhage

that may potentially cause loss of vision.13---16 As

sub-Tenon’s block is performed under direct visualization, it

provides a safe anesthesia with minimal risk for severe

complications.17,18

Table2 Incidenceofsideeffectsandsupplementarydrugrequirementspresentedasn(%).

Group1(n=20) Group2(n=20) p

IntraoperativeOCR 10(50%) 7(35%) 0.337

Intraoperativeatropine 4(20%) 4(20%) 1

(4)

352 K.Tuzcuetal. OCR,atrigeminal---vagal reflexresponsemanifesting as

cardiac arrhythmias and hypotension, occurs in response to retraction of extra-ocular muscles during strabismus surgery. Several maneuvers have been proposed to elimi-nateorreduceOCRintheliterature.However,noneofthese methods are considered effective, safe, or acceptable.1,3

Intramuscularadministrationofanticholinergicagentsused

in premedication, such as atropine and glycopyrrolate,

areinadequateinpreventingOCR.19 Instrabismussurgery,

manipulation of extraocular muscles also increases PONV

incidencebystimulatingtheoculometricreflex.1,3---5

Astudyinwhichpropofolanesthesiawasusedinpediatric

strabismussurgeryreportedthatsub-Tenon’sblock

signifi-cantlydecreased OCR and PONVincidence.5 In our study,

although OCR and PONV were less commonly observed in

thegroupthatunderwentsub-Tenon’sblock,thedifference

betweengroupswasnotsignificant.Thedifferencebetween

twostudygroups,despiteidenticalnumbersofpatientsin

groups, could be due to the distinct anesthetic methods

used.Propofolinfusioncouldhavecontributedtodecreased

PONVincidence.However,thisdoes notexplainthelower

incidenceofOCR.

In the pediatric population, another major

prob-lem is postoperative pain management. In recent years,

sub-Tenon’s block has frequently been used in

oph-thalmic surgery, as it provides akinesia in the globe and

has potential advantages over needle-based blocks.1,17,20

In a sub-Tenon’s block, local anesthetic is injected

posterior to Tenon’s capsule and distributed with

extra-ocularmuscles, therebyexertinganesthetic andanalgesic

effects.20,21

AstudybySteibetal.5 reportedthatsub-Tenon’sblock

decreased postoperative pain when compared to a

con-trolgroupthatwasinjectedwithsaline.Inanotherstudy,

sub-Tenon’sblockwascomparedtoanintravenousfentanyl

injectionandreportedthatsub-Tenon’sblockprovided

bet-teranalgesia.7 Inourstudy,postoperativepainscoresand

the need for additional analgesic were decreased in the

groupthatunderwentsub-Tenon’sblock;theseresultsare

inagreementwithliterature.5,10,22

In conclusion, we think that sub-Tenon’s block,

com-binedwithgeneralanesthesia,isnoteffectiveorreliablein

decreasingOCRandPONV.Furtherstudieswithlarger

sam-plesizes areneeded;however,asub-Tenon’sblockissafe

forreducingpostoperativepainandtheneedforadditional

analgesiainpediatricstrabismussurgery.

Authorship

KT, MC, EAT, MK and ID conceived the study and

partici-patedinitsdesignandcoordinationandhelpedtodraftthe

manuscript.SH,SAandSTperformedthereviewofthe

liter-ature,wrotetheinitialdraftandperformedthestatistical

analyses. MCand EAT performed surgery and drafted the

manuscript.ID andST analyzedthedata.Allauthorsread

andapprovedthefinalmanuscript.

Conflicts

of

interest

Theauthorsdeclarenoconflictsofinterest.

References

1.McGoldrickKE,Gayer SI. Anesthesiaand theeye. In:Barash PG,CullenBF,StoeltingRK,editors.Clinicalanesthesia.5thed. Philadelphia:LippencottWilliams&Wilkins;2006.p.974---96.

2.Blanc VF, Hardy JF, Milot J, et al. The oculocardiac reflex: agraphicandstatisticalanalysisininfantsandchildren.Can AnaesthSocJ.1983;30:360---9.

3.DonlonJV,DoyleJDJ.Anesthesiaforeye,ear,noseandthroat surgery.In:MillerRD,editor.Anesthesia.NewYork:Churchill Livingstone;1990.p.2001---23.

4.WierPM,MunroHM,ReynoldsPI,etal.Propofolinfusionandthe incidenceofemesisinpediatricoutpatientstrabismussurgery. AnesthAnalg.1993;76:760---4.

5.Steib A, Karcenty A, Calache E, et al. Effects of subtenon anesthesia combined with general anesthesia on periopera-tiveanalgesicrequirementsinpediatricstrabismussurgery.Reg AnesthPainMed.2005;30:478---83.

6.SureshS,WheelerM.Practicalpediatric regionalanesthesia. AnesthesiolClinNorthAm.2002;20:83---113.

7.Ghai B, RamJ, Makkar JK,et al. Subtenon blockcompared tointravenousfentanylforperioperativeanalgesiainpediatric cataractsurgery.AnesthAnalg.2009;108:1132---8.

8.Sethi S, Ghai B, Sen I, et al. Efficacy ofsubtenon block in infants---acomparisonwithintravenousfentanylfor perioper-ativeanalgesiaininfantilecataractsurgery.PaediatrAnaesth. 2013;23:1015---20.

9.Ates Y, Unal N, Cuhruk H, et al. Postoperative analgesia in childrenusing preemptive retrobulbar blockand local anes-theticinfiltrationinstrabismussurgery.RegAnesthPainMed. 1998;23:569---74.

10.SheardRM,MehtaJS,BarryJS,etal.Subtenonslidocaine injec-tionfor postoperativepainrelief afterstrabismussurgery in children:apilotstudy.JAAPOS.2003;7:38---41.

11.SubramaniamR,SubbarayuduS,RewariV,etal.Usefulnessof pre-emptiveperibulbarblockinpediatricvitreoretinalsurgery: aprospectivestudy.RegAnesthPainMed.2003;28:43---7.

12.Chhabra A, Sinha R, Subramaniam R, et al. Comparison of sub-Tenon’sblockwithi.v.fentanylforpaediatricvitreoretinal surgery.BrJAnaesth.2009;103:739---43.

13.Rodriques-ColemanH,SpaideR.Ocularcomplicationsof nee-dleperforationsduringretrobulbarand peribulbarinjections. OphthalmolClinNorthAm.2001;14:573---9.

14.ParulekarMV,BergS,ElstonJS.Adjunctiveperibulbar anaes-thesiaforpaediatricophthalmicsurgery:aretherisksjustified? PaediatrAnaesth.2002;12:85---6.

15.WongDH.Regionalanaesthesiafor intraocularsurgery.CanJ Anaesth.1993;40:635---57.

16.TrollGF.Regionalophthalmicanesthesia:safetechniquesand avoidanceofcomplications.JClinAnesth.1995;7:163---72.

17.GuisePA.Sub-tenonanesthesia:aprospectivestudyof6,000 blocks.Anesthesiology.2003;98:964---8.

18.AndersonCJ.Circumferentialperilimbalanesthesia.JCataract RefractSurg.1996;22:1009---12.

19.MirakurRK,ClarkeRS,DundeeJW,etal.Anticholinergicdrugs inanaesthesia.Asurveyoftheirpresentposition.Anaesthesia. 1978;33:133---8.

20.Ripart J, Metge L, Prat-Pradal D, et al. Medial canthus single-injection episcleral (sub-tenon anesthesia): computed tomographyimaging.AnesthAnalg.1998;87:42---5.

21.Niemi-MurolaL,Krootila K,KivisaariR,etal.Localizationof localanestheticsolutionbymagneticresonanceimaging. Oph-thalmology.2004;111:342---7.

Imagem

Table 2 Incidence of side effects and supplementary drug requirements presented as n (%).

Referências

Documentos relacionados

Significant differences between strabismus groups submitted to adjustable technique and non-adjustable on postoperative day 1 were observed (p=0.00 for ET and p=0.01 for XT ) and

The full protection reserves are the private reserves of Natural patrimony, better known as RPPN, the biological reserve (Rebio) and state parks (PAREST). Regarding the

As for reported symptoms (Table 2), there was a significant difference between the two groups: flatulence, postprandial fullness and abdominal pain were more prevalent in the

Significant differences on pain scores and cortisol concentrations among groups were not detected during the 24 hours after surgery and, on the basis of these results, vedaprofen

A reflexão sobre essa experiência permite notar o quanto a prática pedagógica se altera na medida em mudam os contextos universitários e institucionais, em função dos

The mean PADYQ scores for upper abdominal pain, abdominal bloating, early satiety, nausea and vomiting were compared between patients classified as having ATH and those having

The differences between groups were statistical- ly significant (p=0.001) only for footwear (Figure 1): There were no significant differences for dimensions in the questionnaire

Depois de debatidas as questões de vida e morte, próprias de um ambiente educacional que mostra suas condições para a efetivação do en- sino de filosofia, as miragens seguem