EVPHROSYNE
R E V I S TA D E F I L O L O G I A C L Á S S I C A
CENTRO DE ESTUDOS CLÁSSICOS
F A C U L D A D E D E L E T R A S D E L I S B O A
MMXVI
N O V A S É R I E
VOLUME XLIV
http://www.letras.ulisboa.pt
ESTE VOLUME DE EVPHROSYNE TEM O APOIO DE:
VOL. XLIV
MMXVIE
V
P
HR
O
S
Y
NE
ORIENTAÇÕES PARA PREPARAÇÃO DE ORIGINAIS
01. Euphrosyne — Revista de Filologia Clássica, órgão do Centro de Estudos Clássicos da Universidade de Lisboa, está aberta à colaboração da comunidade científica na área da filologia clássica, entendendo esta em sentido largo da diacronia da tradição, das áreas científicas específicas e respectivas disciplinas.
2. Os artigos poderão ser enviados por correio electrónico para centro.classicos@letras.ulisboa.pt ou para a morada do Centro de Estudos Clássicos.
3. Os originais enviados para publicação devem ser inéditos e não estar submetidos a outra entidade editorial; serão remetidos à Direcção de Euphrosyne em forma definitiva e apresentados segundo as normas da revista. Os originais não serão devolvidos, assumindo-se que os autores conservam cópia dos mesmos. Os trabalhos considerados a publi-cação são sujeitos a arbitragem científica.
4. Serão aceites até 31 de Dezembro trabalhos para publicação no volume do ano seguinte; será dada informação sobre a aceitação da publicação até 30 de Abril do ano da publicação do volume.
5. O original será sempre apresentado electronicamente e em forma dupla: em documento de texto (Word/.doc(x) – pref.) e em PDF.
6. O artigo será encabeçado por: a) título (breve e explícito); b) nome e apelidos do autor; c) instituição académica ou científica a que está adstrito; d) endereço electrónico; e) resumo (não superior a 10 linhas) em língua inglesa; f) indicação de três palavras-chave em língua inglesa.
7. A extensão recomendada para os artigos é de 10 páginas, não devendo ultrapassar 20 páginas de A4, a corpo 12 e duplo espaço.
8. Sistema de notas: fim de artigo (endnotes); numeração automática seguida. Na publicação, as notas de artigo sairão em fundo de página (footnotes).
9. Sistema de referências:
a) Não é permitida remissão para páginas do interior do artigo. b) Referências (em nota):
Monografias: J. de Romilly, La crainte et l’angoisse dans le théâtre d’Eschyle, Paris, 1959, pp. 120-130 (casa editora
mencionada apenas para edições antigas). Ou em 2.ª ref.: J. de Romilly, op. cit., p. 78.
Revistas: R. S. Caldwell, “The Misogyny of Eteocles”, Arethusa, 6, 1973, 193-231 (vol., ano, pp.). Ou em 2.ª ref.:
R. S. Caldwell, loc. cit.
Obras colectivas: G. Cavallo, “La circolazione dei testi greci nell’Europa dell’Alto Medioevo” in J. Hamesse (ed.),
Rencontres de cultures dans la Philosophie Médiévale – Traductions et traducteurs de l’Antiquité tardive au XIVe
siècle, Louvain-la-Neuve, 1990, pp. 47-64.
c) Abreviaturas: Seguir-se-ão as abreviaturas convencionadas por ThLL, para autores latinos; Liddel-Scott-Jones,
para autores gregos; Année Philologique, para títulos de revistas; para as abreviaturas mais comuns: p. / pp.; ed. / edd.; cf.; s.u.; supra; op. cit.; loc. cit.; uid.; a.C. / d.C. (em redondo).
d) Citações: Devem ser colocadas entre comas “…” (não as de textos gregos); os itálicos serão utilizados apenas para
sublinhar palavras ou pequenas frases; as citações em latim ou em grego serão breves.
10. Eventuais figuras ou imagens serão de qualidade gráfica (de preferência no formato TIF, com a resolução mínima de 200 p.p.), fornecidas em suporte electrónico (como os originais) e com a indicação precisa da referência no texto e na ordem assim como do título (devem ser acautelados os direitos de reprodução por parte do autor do artigo). 11. Aos autores não será fornecido mais do que um jogo de provas; estas deverão ser devolvidas num prazo máximo de
7 dias. Em princípio, não serão permitidas alterações ao original.
12. Aos autores será fornecido um exemplar do volume e a versão electrónica do respectivo artigo.
E V P H R O S Y N E
R E V I S T A D E F I L O L O G I A C L Á S S I C A
Centro de Estudos Clássicos - Faculdade de Letras PT - 1600-214 LISBOA centro.classicos@letras.ulisboa.pt
E V P H R O S Y N E
R E V I S T A D E F I L O L O G I A C L Á S S I C A*
C E N T R O D E E S T U D O S C L Á S S I C O S F A C U L D A D E D E L E T R A S D E L I S B O A PT - 1600-214 LISBOA PORTUGAL e-mail: centro.classicos@letras.ulisboa.pt sítio electrónico: http://www.tmp.letras.ulisboa.pt/cecdiReCtoRa
maRia CRiStina CaStRo-maiade SouSa Pimentel ComiSSãode RedaCção
abeldo naSCimento Pena, ana maRia SanChez taRRío, aRnaldo monteiRodo eSPíRito Santo, JoSé
PedRo Silva SantoS SeRRa, manuel JoSéde SouSa baRboSa, Paulo FaRmhouSe albeRto, vanda maRia
Coutinho GaRRido anaStáCio ConSelho CientíFiCo
aiReS auGuSto do naSCimento (U. Lisboa), CaRloS Santini (U. Perugia), CaRmen CodoñeR meRino (U. Salamanca), emilio SuáRezdela toRRe(U. Pompeu Fabra), Joël thomaS(U. Perpignan), JoSé manuel
díaz de buStamante(U. Santiago de Compostela), manuel alexandRe JúnioR(U. Lisboa), maRC mayeR y olivé (U. Barcelona), Paolo Fedeli(U. Bari), thomaS eaRle(U. Oxford)
ConSelhode aRbitRaGem CientíFiCa
albeRto beRnabé PaJaReS (U. Complutense de Madrid), ánGel uRbán FeRnández(U. Córdoba), auRelio PéRez
Jiménez(U. Málaga), maRía adelaida andReS(U. Salamanca), CaRloS moRaiS(U. Aveiro), CaRmen moRenilla
talenS(U. Valencia), CRiStobal maCíaS villaloboS(U. Málaga), maRía eliSa laGe CotoS(U. Santiago de Compostela), euStaquio SánChez SaloR(U. Extremadura), Fabio Stok(U. Roma II – Tor Vergata), FedeRiCo
RuSSo (U. Konstanz), GRant a. nelSeStuen (U. Wiscounsin), GRaziana bReSCia (U. Foggia), GReGoRio
RodRíGuez heRReRa(U. Las Palmas de Gran Canaria), iñiGo Ruiz aRzalluz (U. País Vasco), JoSé maRía
maeStRe maeStRe(U. Cádiz), JeSúS-maRía nieto ibáñez(U. León), Joaquim PinheiRo(U. Madeira), manuel
loPez muñoz(U. Almería), nuno SimõeS RodRiGueS(U. Lisboa), RamiRo González delGado(U. Extremadura), RiChaRd maRShall (U. Oxford), RoSalba dimundo(U. Bari), RoSSana GuGlielmetti(U. Milano), SantiaGo
loPez moReda (U. Extremadura), SebaStião tavaReSde Pinho (U. Coimbra), Silvana RoCCa (U. Genova)
Tiragem 500 exemplares Depósito legal 178089/02
ISSN 0870-0133
PubliCação anual SuJeita a aRbitRaGem CientíFiCa ReFeRenCiadaem
l’année PhiloloGique| aRtSand humanitieS Citation index| biblioGRaPhieinteRnationale del’humaniSmeetdela RemaniSSanCe| CSa linGuiStiCSand lanGuaGe behavioR abStRaCtS
F A C U L D A D E D E L E T R A S D E L I S B O A
EVPHROSYNE
R E V I S TA D E F I L O L O G I A C L Á S S I C A
MMXVI
Existem vários outros textos cosmogónicos na literatura védica posterior – o Atharva
Veda (XI, 8), o Brihad-aranyaka Upanishad (1, 2, 1-3), o Chandogya Upanisha (III, 19, 1-2;
VI, 2, 1-4; Bhattacharya 3, 5) – que oferecem outras interpretações da origem do mundo, através da separação do céu e da terra; do sacrifício e desmembramento de um ser primor-dial ou, ainda, através da eclosão de um ovo primigénio; mas o Nasadiya é, sem dúvida, o mais antigo e talvez o mais belo destes textos, pelo que se compreende a opção do autor em restringir o registo védico a esta narrativa.
Já no âmbito babilónico e atendendo à particularidade da designada Teogonia de
Dunnu, compreende-se que o autor lhe dê também especial destaque, consagrando-lhe
um capítulo separado, embora incluído no capítulo genérico dedicado ao Antigo Próximo Oriente. Não obstante, ao tratar-se de um texto babilónico, a obra ganharia, talvez, em maior harmonia se este fosse incluído no corpus babilónico.
De igual modo, a orgânica da obra ficaria mais clara ao leitor se o Capítulo 7, dedi-cado ao mundo grego entre o Oriente e o Ocidente, aparecesse imediatamente antes do Capítulo 9, que justamente diz respeito às cosmogonias gregas, em vez de anteceder o Capítulo 8, consagrado ao mundo hitita; e ainda se, no Capítulo 9, depois da introdução que se faz ao âmbito grego, fossem incluídos os textos que o autor opta por considerar em capítulos separados (designadamente do Capítulo 10 ao Capítulo 14).
O mundo grego é sem dúvida o âmbito de investigação em que o autor se sente mais à vontade, como denota a contextualização que faz dos textos incluídos, em contraste com o registo mais sucinto dos capítulos anteriores dedicados ao Antigo Próximo Oriente.
Em suma, porém, o autor leva-nos numa viagem mágica, através de textos arcaicos de grande beleza e lirismo: uma obra de mérito que definitivamente merece a pena conhecer.
MARIA JOÃO CORREIA SANTOS
Centro de Estudos Clássicos da Faculdade de Letras da Universidade de Lisboa mj.correiasantos@letras.ulisboa.pt
F
RANCOM
ONTANARI, S
TEPHANOSM
ATTHAIOS, A
NTONIOSR
ENGAKOS, Brill’s
Com-panion to Ancient Greek Scholarship, vol. 1: History. Disciplinary profiles;
vol. 2: Between theory and practice, Leiden – Boston, Brill, 2015. 2 vol.
1504 pp. ISBN 978-90-04-24594-5
Given the increasing interest that this area of study has received in the last few decades, an up-to-date and comprehensive study of Ancient Greek Scholarship was very necessary and expected. The current companion is a collective contribution in two volumes, which will undoubtedly become a reference work for anyone who studies not only ancient Greek scholarship, but also other disciplines which are intimately related in their develop-ment and way of transmission, such as rhetorics, mythography or Hellenistic astronomy. In the preface, the editors declare that the approach followed is a “positive reassess-ment” of the ancient Greek scholarship as a field of study in itself, and not an as “ancillary science” or as a source of fragments of lost works (p. IX). Indeed, R. Pfeiffer in his History
of Classical Scholarship (1968) reclaimed the role of ancient scholarship as an important
part of ancient culture in its own right, an approach vindicated by several scholars since (L. D. Reynolds, N. G. Wilson published also in 1968 their Scribes and Scholars. A Guide
to the Transmission of Greek and Latin Literature, Oxford. Other previous studies on
scholarship are F. Pontani, “La Filologia”, in SleGA II, Roma, 1995, pp. 307-351; E. Dickey,
Ancient Greek Scholarship, Oxford, 2007; Stephanos Matthaios, Franco Montanari,
LIBRI RECENSITI
347
Contexts. Trends in classics – supplementary volumes, 8. Berlin – New York: De Gruyter,2011; F. Montanari, L. Pagani (eds.), From Scholars to Scholia. Chapters in the History
of Ancient Greek Scholarship, Trends in Classics Supplement 9, Berlin–New York, 2011). At the same time, the intrinsic interdisciplinary nature of scholarship has not been avoided in the companion and – besides the historical and topic-based description – it includes a section on related disciplines or genres.
Ancient scholarship is defined by the editors as the “numerous phenomena that belong to literary civilization. The term ‘scholarship’ refers (...) to all written works that aim specifically and directly to provide an interpretation of the literary works on various levels. (…) It refers to different forms of commentary on the text and to exegetic treatments of monographic nature. (…) [It] also covers many other genres, (…) lexicography and linguistic-grammatical studies, which can and must be expanded to include (...) biography, paremiography, mythography, studies on metrics, not to mention studies into the form of the ancient book (…)” (p. X). The common element of all these types of works is that they can be generally defined as “text on a text or text about a text” (p. XI).
The work is organised into three parts: History, Disciplinary Profiles and Between
Theory and Practice. The first volume covers the first two parts, and the second volume is
exclusively dedicated to the third part for it is a broader field.
The historical description is comprised of four chapters covering the different periods – from its origins to Alexandria, the Hellenistic period, the Imperial era and Late Antiquity and the Byzantine Empire. It is, as the editors declare, “the only up-to-date systematic compendium of history of ancient scholarship from the origins up to the Byzantine age” (p. XIV). In turn, each chapter is divided into sections by topics and preceded by an index – as are all other chapters in the companion – which facilitates looking up of specific issues. One can imagine that the editors gave priority to the purpose of offering a practical tool for consultation. In return, in the historical part, the atomization of topics sometimes disrupts the fluidity of lecture due to the constant shifting. As an example, the first chap-ter, which covers the Archaic and Classical periods, is divided into three main sections. The first section has 7 subsections, the second two subsections, the first of which has six sub-sub-sections, and the third has 10 subsections, some of which in turn have more divi-sions. Nevertheless, it is a good and clear exposition of a great amount of material, based in the presentation of the primary sources and providing the relevant bibliography for the many discussed topics.
The second part, Disciplinary profiles, is dedicated to the sources of scholarship, the definition of grammar and the typology of works which fall under the label of philology and grammar. E. Dickey gives a clear and condensed description of the different sources organised according to their textual form: papyri, extant works – lexica, grammatical works, commentaries and others such as Photius –, fragmentary works and scholia. I find the chapter extremely useful for it goes straight to the point and elucidates the nature of sources with a complicated historical transmission. The Mythographus Homericus is mentioned in the section on papyri. It would have been desirable to also find it in the section on the Homeric scholia, since the major number of fragments considered to be Mythographus Homericus are preserved in the D scholia. In the bibliographical notes, E. Dickey forgot to mention a dissertation of 2007 which consists in an edition of the Mythographus Homericus of the Iliad (J. Pagès, Mythographus Homericus. Estudi i edició
comentada (diss.), Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 2007).
The chapter on grammar is a historical and critical analysis of the formation of grammar as a discipline and the definitions of ancient scholars such as Eratosthenes of Cyrene, Sextus Empiricus or Asclepiades of Myrlea provide.
The third chapter provides a theoretical description of the different types of philo-logical writings and gives a definition and a delimitation of philology. The absence of a delimitation of ancient philology inside the broader category of ancient scholarship, or of a discussion on how these two categories relate to each other is a bit puzzling. Since ancient scholarship is defined in the preface as “texts on texts”, I wonder how this is differ-ent from the definition that M. Dubischar claims to be adopting in the chapter: “philology
has two main purposes: first, to restore, preserve, and transmit important texts from the past; and, second, to understand and interpret these texts adequately” (p. 564). The use of the expression “philological scholarship” in many places (pp. 549, 561, 562, 564, 569, 588, 589, 590 and more) implies that philology is seen as a type of scholarship. Which part of ancient scholarship, then, should we not consider philological? Nor is clear to me the differentiation inside scholarship in section 4.1 “External and Internal Differentiation of Philological writing”. Regarding scholia, the author expresses that “scholia and scholi-ography will be considered as phenomena of reception and transmission, not as original philological production (p. 548)”. This is understandable from a practical point of view. However, very often scholia are the only source for Alexandrian philology, whose works are preserved only fragmentarily. In fragmentary works one should not forget, as Dickey pointed out in the previous chapter, that these works are constructions of editors, and is not possible to assess them without taking into account the way of transmission. Besides that, the contributor poses three questions about philology that seem very pertinent to me: “which types of philological writings did exist? Why these types? How are they related to one another?”. Also, the description of each type of philological action or product and the analysis using the system theory as a framework are innovative and thought-provoking.
The last chapter undertakes a classification of the type of grammars, setting two big groups: the IJȤȞȘ-type and related monographs – “a comprehensive and systematic account of grammar and its tasks, along with the definition and description of the parts of the speech” (p. 601) – and the monographs on Hellenismos – “dealing with doubtful cases and irregularities” – none of which has survived but can be reconstructed from the description of Sextus Empiricus and from the comparison with works on Latin.
The second volume contains the third part, Between Theory and Praxis, and has the purpose of assessing the “concrete application of theories to literary texts and language” (p. xv). This part is divided into three main sections: Scholarship, Grammar and
Philo-logical and Linguistic Observations and Theories in Interdisciplinary Context.
The first section (Scholarship) includes three contributions: one on Ekdosis, another on Homeric criticism and a third one on poetics and literary criticism.
The first chapter describes the historical development of Ekdosis focusing on its pro-cedures, “the way in which it was materially constructed” (p. 644). Several papyrological testimonies (P. Ilias 12, P. Odyssey 31, P. Univ. Milan. 309, P. Oxy 2161, P. Berol inv. 9872, P. Oxy. 2256, Pbodmer 2, Poxy. 2404 + Plaur. 111/278) are presented to support the view that new examples of literary books were re-read and compared to the antigraph and to other editions and that they were corrected. In the second section of the chapter, Monta-nari studies the processes involved in the choice between the variae lectiones and in the conjectures of ancient editors, analysing both the indirect evidence and the direct testi-mony provided by the case of the recently discovered manuscript of Galen’s De indolentia. Montanari also presents a state-of-the-art debate on whether the Alexandrian editors from Zenodotus to Aristarchos carried out a collation of manuscripts, about which he has a positive position. He concludes that “in a historical perspective, all that is needed in order for there to be a decisive step forward in intellectual achievement was the very fact of understanding and addressing the problem, even if only partially, erratically and incoher-ently” (p. 671).
As R. Hunter underlines, the dominant role of Homer in education and scholarship is clearly reflected in the “centrality of Homeric texts to the growth of critical practice and terminology” (p. 673). Therefore, the Homeric criticism deserved this second chapter on its own. R. Hunter groups the topics on which Homer was commented in Antiquity into four categories: stylistic, didactic, rhetorical and ethical, “though little weight is to be given to the boundaries of these four categories” (p. 674). Using different examples, he offers first a survey of the earliest critical discussions, which “may be classed broadly alle-gorical in the sense that it seeks to uncover meanings in the text which are not patent from what the text appears to say ‘on the surface’” (p. 675). In a second section, he treats the rhetorical criticism of Homer, defining it as “the study of strategies of both language and substance which lead to the effective presentation of arguments and characters” (p. 686).
LIBRI RECENSITI
349
The third chapter consists on the analysis of 90 specific terms and concepts that belong to literary criticism, arranged in alphabetic order. R. Nünlist focuses on the Hellenistic period but does not exclude testimonies from Roman times. The list comprises of a great variety of concepts, amongst which one can find, for example, “Aesthetics”, “Anachronism”, “Book”, “Formulaic language”, “Mythology”, “Prose” or “Synaesthesia”. Even though the alphabetic order helps to find the concepts, given the wide variety, it would have been helpful to include an index – maybe in two or three columns – on the front page of the chapter.
The second section of the third part, on Grammar, is composed of six chapters dedi-cated to the following issues: “1. Description of the constituent elements of the Greek Lan-guage”, “2. Language correctness (Hellenismos) and its criteria”, “3. Syntax”, “4. Ancient etymology”, “5. Prosody” and “6. Orthography”.
The first chapter analyses ideas related to the parts of grammar and language in Plato, Aristotle, the Stoics, the Alexandrian philologists. The chapter ends with a reflection on the constitution and evolution of Greek grammar, which “consisted in the separation of grammar from philosophy and Rhetorics” (p. 792).
The second chapter offers a historical description and analysis of the concept of language correctness in philosophy and rhetoric, in Hellenistic scholarship, in theoretical writings on Hellenismos and in specific authors from the 2nd century AD and later periods.
We also find an analysis of the criteria to evaluate correctness and how they varied depend-ing on the sources.
In chapter 3, on Syntax, J. Lallot starts questioning if this discipline is a part of grammar and describes how this varies across time. The chapter is dedicated to describe ancient ideas on syntax, the notion of congruence, “the principle which governs syntax” (p. 855), the scheme of functions, the syntactic domains and the relations of syntax with logic and philology.
Etymology is the topic of the fourth chapter which bears the suggestive title “Ancient Etymology: A Tool for Thinking”. I. Sluiter declares in the introduction that the chapter’s “main focus will be on the cultural and historical embedding of these practices, analysis of the type of discourse they represent, and their cognitive and rhetorical functions” (p. 896). Ancient etymology is different from the modern etymology in two aspects: it is synchronic, even though it resorts to the past to explain the words; and it seeks to explain the seman-tics of words. The principles of etymological discourse are exemplified in a case study on a passage of Plato’s Cratylus referring the etymology of the name of Apollo (405a-406a). Its technique is described using another example from the Cratylus (349b). Etymology gives support to cultural memory, is a heuristic tool, a tool of interpretation and of persuasive argumentation and a mnemotecnic aid.
The fifth chapter is about ancient theory of prosody. It starts with a historical description of the branches of prosody – vowels, quantities and breathings. The following sections deal with the ancient theories on breathings and vowel quantities. Sections 5 to 10 are dedicated to the accent.
The sixth and last chapter of this section describes the history of orthography from its beginnings to Herodian’s systematization.
The last section is, as we said, dedicated to works from other genres which present philological characteristics and procedures. Its purpose, as stated in the preface, is to “bring to light the presence of elements and attitudes of a philological-exegetic character, and involving language problems, in works and treatments belonging to literary genres that are distinct from scholarship itself, even if scholarship is understood in the broad sense” (p. xv). Seven chapters cover the following genres: rhetorics, philosophy, mythog-raphy, the triad of historiogmythog-raphy, ethnography and geogmythog-raphy, medicine, astronomy and zoology.
The title of the first chapter is “Grammatical Theory and Rhetorical Teaching”. C. C. de Jonge underlines that rhetoric and grammar were the “two pillars of Hellenistic and Roman education” (p. 982) and it is therefore not possible to draw a clear line separating
the two fields. The chapter is dedicated to describing how grammatical theory is used in rhetorical treatises, focusing on letters, parts of speech, word order and grammatical figures of speech, for they are the “categories most obviously influenced by grammatical theory” (p. 983). In the study, the following specific works are focussed on, for they are representatives of Greek rhetoric and integrate grammatical theory and rhetorical teaching:
On Style of Demetrius (second or first cent. BC), several treatises and literary letters of
Dionysius of Halicarnassus (end of first cent. BC), and the anonymous On the Sublime (data unknown).
W. Lapini treats the approaches to language and the philological observations in philosophy. The chapter is divided into two sections: the first is on language, where he discusses the sophistic methods prior to the sophistic movement, in the sophistic move-ment, in Plato, in Aristotle and in Hellenistic philosophies; the second section is on philology, where he discusses the Alexandrian scholarship as cultural paradigm, the rela-tionship between philology and different philosophical schools, Panaetius and Galen and the Aristotelian commentaries.
Mythography is the topic of the third chapter. C. Meliado presents a description of the principal mythographers, which, as he declares at the end of the chapter, “does not claim to be complete but may have helped to define the fundamental role covered by the study of myth in ancient times”. He quotes significant passages of some of the mytho-graphical works he deals with and comments on the key issues. The authors included in the section “The origins of mythography” are Hecateus of Miletos, Acusilaos of Argos, Pherecydes, Simonides of Ceos, Hellanicus and Herodorus. The second section is titled “The birth of scientific mythography” and starts by referring to Asclepiades of Tragilos, Glaucus of Rhegium, Heraclides Ponticus and Philochorus of Athens, all related to tragic myths and fragmentarily preserved. He continues with Dionysus Schytobrachion, Apollo-dorus of Athens, the Library, Pisander, Parthenius of Nicaea, Antoninus Liberalis, Conon, the Mythographus Homericus and Ptolemaeus Chennos. It is a clear and fluid exposi-tion. However, some important works are missing, as is the case of the Ȇİȡ ਕʌıIJȦȞ of Palaephatus and the more serious case of the Catasterisms of Eratosthenes, a scholar and member of the library of Alexandria who composed, amongst other scholar production, a work on myths of transformations in constellations (the Catasterisms has been included in every modern compilation of mythographers, for instance the Mythographi Graeci of Westermann, 1843 or Wagner, 1897 [vol. 3.1], and since del Canto’s translation in 1992, the interest for it has manifestly increased – nowadays, we have 12 editions and transla-tions and a monographic volume very recently appeared: Jordi Pàmias (ed.), Eratosthenes’
Catasterisms: Receptions and Translations, Mering, 2016). C. Meliado seems to consider
mythography as a phenomenon independent from other phenomena of myth reception. In this sense, it would have been useful if he had provided a definition of the genre or a reference to the discussion on its definition, which itself is related to an older and pro-found debate on the definition of myth (vd. M. Alganza Roldán, “La mitografía como género de la prosa helenística”, FlorIlib., 17, 2006, 9-37; R. Fowler, “Mythos and Logos”,
JHS, 131, 2011, 45-66). A discussion on how – or if – mythography should be considered
a part of ancient scholarship, together with an analysis on how the transmitted texts of “mythographers” show procedures which come from or are characteristic of scholarship, is especially missed. An example the author could have used to elaborate on that is the use of etymology by Apollodorus of Athens to explain the names of the Gods, to which he refers in p. 1075, or the interesting introduction of Parthenius of Nicaea, quoted in p. 1082, where Parthenius declares the purpose of the work and his method of composi-tion. Eratosthenes, a scholar himself, would have been the perfect case study to discuss about the relation between mythography and scholarship. Regarding the bibliographical references, the edition with commentary of the Library’s first two books by F. Cuartero is missing (Cuartero, Francesc J., Pseudo-Apol·lodor. Biblioteca. Vol. 1 [Llibre I], Fundació Bernat Metge, Barcelona, 2010; Pseudo-Apol·lodor. Biblioteca. Vol. 2 [Llibre II], Fundació Bernat Metge, Barcelona, 2012), as well as other important non Anglo-Saxonic bibliography.
LIBRI RECENSITI
351
Chapter 4 is about historiography, ethnography and geography; three disciplines that partially overlap each other and intersect with other disciplines. These issues are treated by R. Nicolai in the foreword. The chapter is divided into four sections on Greek authors – “Historians as the Object of Philological Enquiry and Rhetorical Analysis”, “Genealogists and Geographers”, “The great Historiography of the Classical age”, “Hellenistic Historiog-raphy and GeogHistoriog-raphy” – and one last section on Latin historiogHistoriog-raphy and antiquarianism. The fifth chapter explores the exegesis on medical texts. These are attested already in the 5th century BC, as the written texts “played a crucial role (…) in the structuring
and transmission of knowledge (…) within the groups of physicians (p. 1128)”. D. Manetti explores the relation of literacy and medical practice, and he addresses Hippocrates and the formation of the Corpus Hippocraticum. A third part is dedicated to editions, commen-taries and other types of scholar works on medical texts. The last section is titled “Medi-cine and Culture in the Roman Empire up to Late Antiquity”.
The last two chapters, on astronomy and zoology, support what R. Luiselli explains in the introduction of her contribution “Hellenistic Astronomers and Scholarship”: “science and scholarship enjoyed impressive connection in the Hellenistic period” (p. 1016). The chapter focuses on a “text-critical as well as exegetical attitude shown by those who were concerned not so much with the arts subject, rather with the phenomena of nature (…). This chapter will be focused on individuals who were known in Antiquity as astrono-mers, and it will focus on the second century BC” (p. 1216). The contribution is organised according to different types of scholar activities: source criticism, manuscript collation, the evaluation of variants, emendation and the interpretation of the the paradosis.
“On the Interface of Philology and Science: The Case of Zoology” is the title of the last chapter, which deals first with the ideas of language and speech that are found in ancient biological texts; secondly, O. Hellmann describes the work of Alexandrian scholars on biological texts and data, explaining them, rewriting and creating new works.
As can be seen in the description of contents, this companion is a comprehensive and multifaceted assessment of ancient Scholarship. It is a substantial contribution to the field and it will be of great help for many scholars to have available a work of this type.
NEREIDA VILLAGRA
FCT Scholarship SFRH/BPD/90803/2012 Centro de Estudos Clássicos da Faculdade de Letras da Universidade de Lisboa nereida@campus.ul.pt
R
ICHARDB
OUCHON, P. B
RILLET-D
UBOIS, N
ADINEL
EM
EUR-W
EISSMAN(eds.),
Hymnes de la Grèce Antique. Approches littéraires et historiques. Actes
du Colloque international de Lyon, 19-21 juin 2008, Lyon, Maison de
l’Orient et de la Méditerranée, 2012. 407 pp. ISBN 978-2-35668-031-0
Subordinado ao tema “Les hymnes de la Grèce antique: entre littérature et histoire”, P. Brillet-Dubois reuniu, entre 2005-2008, uma equipa de investigadores provenientes de várias universidades e áreas científicas diversas em torno da figura de Apolo Pítio. Desta investigação comum, resultou o colóquio internacional de Lyon de 2008 e a publicação das Actas em epígrafe, cujo contributo para os estudos hinológicos deve ser desde já subli-nhado.Após sintética e clara introdução (pp. 9-18), estrutura-se esta publicação bilingue em três partes distintas, ocupando-se cada uma delas de três grandes áreas temáticas: Hinos e procedimentos hínicos (pp. 19-165); Como comentar um hino homérico (pp. 167-198); Hino, história religiosa e teologia (pp. 199-312). Reúnem-se na primeira parte sete impor- tantes estudos (F. Létoublon, Ch. Hunzinger, Cl. Calame, N. Le Meur-Wissman, M. Vamvouri
C O M M E N TAT I O N E S
Antígona: luzes e sombras – ANA PAULA PINTO ... 9
Qui sont les rotae dans les Res Rusticae (II, 1, 5) de Varron? – MARCEL MEULDER ... 31
Athènes historique, Athènes éternelle. Le regard de Plutarque sur la ville et ses
monuments – FRANÇOISE FRAZIER ... 65
La mirada de Plutarco: significados y funciones de su testimonio visual en las Vidas
Paralelas – CARLOS ALCALDE-MARTÍN ... 83
Tra Costantinopoli e Vivarium: fonti greche e fonti latine nel Commento ai Salmi di Cassiodoro – PATRIZIA STOPPACCI ... 103
Los progymnasmata de Aftonio publicados por Palmireno en 1552: estudio de un ejemplar localizado en la Biblioteca Nacional de Portugal – M.A VIOLETA PÉREZ
CUSTODIO ... 127
En la estela de Horacio: una epístola latina inédita de Giacinto Frangipane
– EDUARDODEL PINO GONZÁLEZ ... 153
Los progymnasmata en los Praeceptionum rhetoricarum libri V et exercitationum
libri II de Georg Henisch: fuentes y materiales – GREGORIO RODRÍGUEZ HERRERA 173
Entre a fidelidade às origens e o contexto interpretativo: duas adaptações portu- guesas contemporâneas da tragicidade ambígua de Antígona – MARIA JOSÉ
FERREIRA LOPES ... 189
I I
S T V D I A B R E V I O R A
El análisis de los datos sobre la religión prehelénica: una cuestión metodológica – MARCELLO TOZZA ... 211
Sobre la prudencia de un Cicerón demasiado hábil: De inventione 1, 49, 91 a propó-sito de Cornelia, madre de los Gracos – MARC MAYERY OLIVÉ ... 223
Virgil’s Smooth-Talking Pygmalion and Jerome’s Commentaries on Mordiloquent Minor Prophets – NEIL ADKIN ... 235
La reacción cristiana ante el ȀĮIJȋȡȚıIJȚĮȞȞ de Porfirio de Tiro – INMACULADA
RODRÍGUEZ MORENO ... 239
El viaje de Trezenzonio a la isla de Solistición. Refacción de material y distintos niveles de sentido – JOEL VARELA RODRÍGUEZ ... 253
426
RERVM INDEXLa Austriaca siue naumachia de Francisco de Pedrosa y la propaganda al servicio del poder – JUAN CARLOS JIMÉNEZDEL CASTILLO ... 265
La apología de la Biblia Regia escrita por Benito Arias Montano: un documento en paradero desconocido – ANTONIO DÁVILA PÉREZ ... 279
El descenso al infierno del Ovidio de Vintila Horia en la novela Dios ha nacido en
el Exilio. Diario de Ovidio en Tomis – ALEJANDRO MARTÍNEZ SOBRINO ... 291
I I I
VA R I A N O S C E N D A
Iscrizioni romane di tradizione manoscritta: il codice epigrafico di Aquiles Estaço – ALEJANDRA GUZMÁN ALMAGRO ... 307
I V
L I B R I R E C E N S I T I
a) Edições de texto. Comentários. Traduções. Estudos Linguísticos
ESQUILO, Tragedias IV: Coéforos. Euménides, introducciones y texto por Francisco
Rodríguez Adrados, traducciones y notas por Esteban Calderón Dorda – RUI
MIGUEL DUARTE ... 323
SÓFOCLES, Icneutas, os sátiros rastreadores: fragmentos de um drama satírico
reconstituído para a contemporaneidade com base nos aparatos de Stefan Radt e Hugh Lloyd-Jones. Tereza Virgínia Ribeiro Barbosa (org.) – SOFIA FRADE ... 324
MARÍA TERESA GALLEGO PÉREZ, Vida y muerte en el Corpus Hippocraticum – MARIA
JOSÉ MENDESE SOUSA ... 325
POLYBIUS, The Histories, vol. VI: books 28-39, translated by W. R. Paton, revised by Frank W. Walbank and Christian Habicht; Unattributed fragments, edited and translated by S. Douglas Olson – RUI MIGUEL DUARTE ... 326
MARCO TERÊNCIO VARRÃO, Das coisas do campo. Tradução, introdução e notas de Matheus Trevizam – MANUEL JOSÉDE SOUSA BARBOSA ... 327
VIRGÍLIO, Geórgicas I. Org. Matheus Trevizam, traduções de António Feliciano de Castilho e Matheus Trevizam – ANA FILIPA GOMES FERREIRA ... 329
TIBULO, Poemas (Cantos de Amores). Tradução, introdução e notas de Carlos Ascenso André – LUÍS CERQUEIRA ... 330
FRANCESCO CITTI, Cura sui. Studi sul lessico filosofico di Seneca – ANA FILIPA SILVA ... 331
SANDRINE DUBEL (ed.), JACKIE PIGEAUD (postfac.), Lucien de Samosate. Portrait du
JUAN ANTONIO LÓPEZ FÉREZ (ed.), Galeno. Lengua, composición literaria, léxico, estilo – INMACULADA RODRÍGUEZ MORENO ... 334
S. DOUGLAS OLSON (ed.), Athenaeus: The Learned Banqueters. Volume VII: Books 13, 594b-14 – FOTINI HADJITTOFI ... 336
CALCIDIO, Traducción y Comentario del Timeo de Platón. Introducción, traducción y notas de Cristóbal Macías Villalobos – INÊS BOLINHAS ... 337
NONNUSOF PANOPOLIS, Paraphrasis of the Gospel of John XI. Edited by Konstantinos
Spanoudakis – FOTINI HADJITTOFI ... 339
ENARA SAN JUAN MANSO, El Commentum Monacense a Terencio – EFTYCHIA
BATHRELLOU ... 340 Navigatio sancti Brendani, Alla scoperta dei segreti meraviglosi del mondo, edizione
critica a cura di Giovanni Orlandi e Rossana E. Guglielmetti, introduzione di Rossana E. Guglielmetti, traduzione italiana e commento di Giovanni Orlandi – ARNALDODO ESPÍRITO SANTO ... 342
D. JERÓNIMO OSÓRIO, Opera Omnia. Tomo II: Epistolografia. Estabelecimento do texto latino por Sebastião Pinho e António Guimarães Pinto. Introdução, tradução, notas e comentários de António Guimarães Pinto – MARIA LUÍSA RESENDE ... 343
D. JERÓNIMO OSÓRIO, Opera Omnia. Tomo III: Comentários aos Provérbios de Salomão. Estabelecimento do texto latino por Sebastião Pinho e António Guimarães Pinto. Introdução, tradução, notas e comentários de António Guimarães Pinto – MARIA LUÍSA RESENDE ... 344
b) Literatura. Cultura. História
ANTÓNIO JOSÉ GONÇALVESDE FREITAS, Os Deuses e a Origem do Mundo – MARIA JOÃO
CORREIA SANTOS ... 345
FRANCO MONTANARI, STEPHANOS MATTHAIOS, ANTONIOS RENGAKOS, Brill’s Companion to
Ancient Greek Scholarship, vol. 1: History. Disciplinary profiles; vol. 2: Between
theory and practice – NEREIDA VILLAGRA ... 346
RICHARD BOUCHON, P. BRILLET-DUBOIS, NADINE LE MEUR-WEISSMAN (eds.), Hymnes de
la Grèce Antique. Approches littéraires et historiques. Actes du Colloque
interna-tional de Lyon, 19-21 juin 2008 – ABEL N. PENA ... 351
ANDRÉ LAKS, ROSSELLA SAETTA COTTONE (dir.), Comédie et philosophie. Socrates et les ‘Présocratiques’ dans les Nuées d’Aristophane – RUI MIGUEL DUARTE ... 353
VICTORIA WOHL, Euripides and the Politics of Form – SOFIA FRADE ... 354
JUAN ANTONIO LÓPEZ FÉREZ, Mitos en las obras conservadas de Eurípides. Guía para
la lectura del trágico – JOSÉ VELA TEJADA ... 356
428
RERVM INDEXROBERT MAYHEW, The Aristotelian Problemata Physica. Philosophical and Scientific Investigations – BERNARDO MACHADO MOTA ... 358
ANDRÉ HURST, Dans les marges de Ménandre – EFTYCHIA BATHRELLOU ... 360
JOAQUIM S. PINHEIRO, Tempo e espaço da paideia nas Vidas de Plutarco – RAMIRO
GONZÁLEZ DELGADO ... 362
JOSEPH GEIGER, Hellenism in the East. Studies on Greek Intellectuals in Palestine – FOTINI HADJITTOFI ... 364
GESINE MANUWALD, ASTRID VOIGT (eds.), Flavian Epic Interactions – ANA MARIA LÓIO ... 365
YVAN NADEAU, Dog Bites Caesar! A Reading of Juvenal’s Satire 5 (with Horace’s Satires
I, 5; II, 5; II, 6; Epistles I, 1; I, 16; I, 17) – MARIA CRISTINA PIMENTEL ... 368
ANDREA LAI, Alle nozze dello Sposo. Gregorio Magno commentatore del ‘Cantico dei
cantici’ e le sue fonti – AMÉRICO PEREIRA ... 369
CÉCILE BOST-POUDERON, BERNARD POUDERON (eds), Les Hommes et les Dieux dans
l’ancien roman. Actes du colloque de Tours, 22-24 octobre 2009 – GIUSEPPE
CIAFARDONE ... 370
CRISTINA-GEORGETA ALEXANDRESCU (ed.), Cult and votive monuments in the Roman
Provinces, Proceedings of the 13th International Colloquium on Roman
Pro-vincial Art (Bucharest, Alba Iulia, Constanta, 27th May – 3rd June 2013 – within
the framework of Corpus Signorum Imperii Romani) – MARIA JOÃO CORREIA
SANTOS ... 371
ROSARIO MORENO SOLDEVILA, JUAN MARTOS (eds.), Amor y sexo en la literatura latina – MARIA JOÃO CORREIA SANTOS ... 374
JUAN ANTONIO LÓPEZ FÉREZ (ed.), La comedia griega en sus textos. Forma (lengua,
léxico, estilo, métrica, crítica textual, pragmática) y contenido (crítica política y literaria, utopía, sátira, intertextualidad, evolución del género cómico) – JOSÉ
VELA TEJADA ... 375
JOËL THOMAS, Mythanalyse de la Rome Antique. Pref. Paul Veyne – NUNO SIMÕES
RODRIGUES ... 378
ALINE ESTÈVES, JEAN MEYERS (eds.), Tradition et innovation dans l’épopée latine, de l’Antiquité au Moyen Âge – LUÍS M. G. CERQUEIRA ... 380
ARNAUD PERROT (ed.), Les Chrétiens et l’Hellénisme. Identités religieuses et culture grecque dans l’Antiquité tardive – RUI MIGUEL DUARTE ... 381
STÉPHANE RATTI, Antiquus error: Les ultimes feux de la résistance païenne ‘Scripta uaria’
augmentés de cinq études inédites – MARIA JOÃO CORREIA SANTOS ... 383
ANTÓNIO MANUEL LOPES ANDRADE, CARLOS DE MIGUEL MORA, JOÃO MANUEL NUNES
TORRÃO (coords.), Humanismo e ciência. Antiguidade e Renascimento – LUANA
BELMIRO FERNANDES PEREIRA, Retórica e Eloquência em Portugal na Época do
cimento – MARIA LUÍSA RESENDE ... 386
ALEJANDRO COROLEU, Printing and Reading Italian Latin Humanism in Renaissance
Europe (ca. 1470 – ca. 1540) – MARIA LUÍSA RESENDE ... 387
A. CASTRO SANTAMARÍA, J. GARCIA NISTAL (coords.), La impronta humanística
(ss. XV-XVIII), saberes, visiones e interpretaciones – MADALENA BRITO ... 388
JERRY TONER, Homer’s Turk: How Classics Shaped Ideas of the East – RUI CARLOS
FONSECA ... 390
SERGIO AUDANO, Classici lettori di classici. Da Virgilio a Marguerite Yourcenar –
GIUSEPPE CIAFARDONE ... 391
TIMOTHY SAUNDERS, CHARLES MARTINDALE, RALPH PITE, MATHILDE SKOIE (ed.), Romans
and Romantics – RICARDO NOBRE ... 398
FRANCISCO RODRÍGUEZ ADRADOS, El cuento erótico griego, latino e índio. Ilustrações de Antonio Mingote – HITESHKUMAR PARMAR ... 401
FRANCISCO RODRÍGUEZ ADRADOS, El Río de la Literatura. De Sumeria y Homero a
Shakespeare y Cervantes – JOAQUIM PINHEIRO ... 404
BELMIRO FERNANDES PEREIRA, JORGE DESERTO (ed.), Symbolon III: Paz e Concórdia; BELMIRO FERNANDES PEREIRA, ANA FERREIRA (ed.), Symbolon IV: Medo e
rança – RICARDO NOBRE ... 405
CRISTINA SANTOS PINHEIRO, ANNE MARTINA EMONTS, MARIADA GLÓRIA FRANCO, MARIA
JOÃO BEJA (coords.), Mulheres: Feminino, Plural – VANDA ANASTÁCIO ... 408 Il senso del Medioevo: In memoriam di Claudio Leonardi, a cura di Antonella
Degl’Innocenti, Donatella Frioli, Paolo Gatti, Fabrizio Rasera – MANUEL JOSÉ DE SOUSA BARBOSA ... 410
LUIS MIGUEL PINO CAMPOS, GERMÁN SANTANA HENRÍQUEZ (eds.), ȀĮȜઁȢ țĮ ਕȖĮșઁȢ ਕȞȒȡ.
ǻȚįĮıțȐȜȠȣ ʌĮȡȐįİȚȖμĮ. Homenaje al Professor Juan Antonio López Férez – NUNO
SIMÕES RODRIGUES ... 412
IÑIGO RUIZ ARZALLUZ (coord.), Estudios de Filología e Historia en Honor del Profesor
Vitalino Valcárcel, 2 vols., edição de Alejandro Martínez Sobrino, Maria Teresa
Muñoz García de Iturrospe, Iñaki Ortigosa Egiraun e Enara San Juan Manso – MARIA FERNANDES ... 413
SALVADOR LÓPEZ QUERO, JOSÉ M.ª MAESTRE MAESTRE (eds.), Studia Angelo Vrbano
Dicata – ANDRÉ SIMÕES ... 418
CRISTÓBAL MACÍAS VILLALOBOS, JOSÉ M.ª MAESTRE MAESTRE, JUAN F. MARTOS MONTIEL
(eds.), Europa Renascens. La Cultura Clásica en Andalucía y su proyección
Euphrosyne foi composto, impressso
e encadernado em Braga, nas Oficinas da PUBLITO – Estúdio de Artes Gráficas, Lda.
ARTICLE SUBMISSION GUIDELINES
1. Euphrosyne — Revista de Filologia Clássica, the peer journal of the Centre for Classical Studies, publishes papers on classical philology and its disciplines (including classical reception and tradition).
2. Papers can be sent to centro.classicos@letras.ulisboa.pt or to the Centre for Classical Studies’ post mail. 3. Papers submitted: must be original; cannot be yield to other entity; must be sent in their definite version; have to be
presented according to these guidelines; will not be returned to the author. Papers will be submitted to peer reviews. 4. Papers will be accepted until 31st of December in the year previous to publication; an acceptance notification will
be sent to the author until 30th of April in the year of publication.
5. Originals must always be submitted in double electronic format (Word/.doc(x) and PDF).
6. Papers must have: a) title (short and clear); b) author’s name and surname; c) author’s academic or scientific insti-tution; d) author’s email; e) abstract (10 lines) in English; f) three key-words in English.
7. Recommended size is 10 pages and never more than 20 A4 pages (font size 12, double spaced). 8. Notes: endnotes, with sequential numeration. When published, these will be converted to footnotes. 9. References:
a) Remissions to pages within the paper are not allowed. b) Note references:
Books: J. DE ROMILLY, La crainte et l’angoisse dans le théâtre d’Eschyle, Paris, Les Belles Letres, 1959, pp. 120-130;
2nd reference: J. DE ROMILLY, op. cit., p. 78.
Journals: R. S. CALDWELL, “The Misogyny of Eteocles”, Arethusa, 6, 1973, 193-231 (vol., year, pp.). 2nd reference:
R. S. CALDWELL, loc. cit.
Multi-author volumes: G. CAVALLO, “La circolazione dei testi greci nell’Europa dell’Alto Medioevo” in J. Hamesse (ed.), Rencontres de cultures dans la Philosophie Médiévale — Traductions et traducteurs de l’Antiquité tardive
au XIVe siècle, Paris, Les Belles Letres, 1971, pp. 47-64.
c) Abbreviations: to Latin authors will be followed ThLL conventions; Liddel-Scott-Jones will be used to Greek
authors; Année Philologique to abbreviate journal titles; common abbreviations: p. / pp.; ed. / edd.; cf.; s.u.; supra; op. cit.; loc. cit.; uid.; a.C. / d.C. (roman).
d) Quotations: Must be marked by quotes “…” (but not in Greek); italic is used to highlight words or short sentences;
quotations in Latin or Greek must be brief.
10. Images must have quality (preferably in TIF format, minimum resolution 200 p.p.), provided in electronic format, with the precise indication of where they must be placed in the text, and who is their author. The author is responsible for obtaining any copyrights needed.
11. The author will not be provided with more than one set for review, which has to be returned within a week period. Originals cannot be modified.
12. Authors will receive a physical copy of the volume and the electronic version of their paper.
E V P H R O S Y N E
R E V I S T A D E F I L O L O G I A C L Á S S I C A
Centro de Estudos Clássicos - Faculdade de Letras PT - 1600-214 LISBOA
