braz j infect dis 2 0 1 6;20(4):389–392
w w w . e l s e v i e r . c o m / l o c a t e / b j i d
The
Brazilian
Journal
of
INFECTIOUS
DISEASES
Brief
communication
Fusarium
spp
infections
in
a
pediatric
burn
unit:
nine
years
of
experience
María
Teresa
Rosanova
a,∗,
Martín
Brizuela
a,
Mabel
Villasboas
b,
Fabian
Guarracino
b,
Veronica
Alvarez
a,
Patricia
Santos
c,
Jorge
Finquelievich
aaHospitaldePediatría“Prof.Dr.JuanP.Garrahan”,DepartamentodeEnfermedadesInfecciosas,BuenosAires,Argentina bHospitaldePediatría“Prof.Dr.JuanP.Garrahan”,UnidaddeCuidadosIntensivosdeQuemados,BuenosAires,Argentina cHospitaldePediatría“Prof.Dr.JuanP.Garrahan”,DepartmentodeMicrobiología,BuenosAires,Argentina
a
r
t
i
c
l
e
i
n
f
o
Articlehistory:
Received4January2016 Accepted18April2016 Availableonline25May2016
Keywords:
Burn
Fusariumspp Fungalinfections
a
b
s
t
r
a
c
t
Introduction:Fusariumsppareubiquitousfungirecognizedasopportunisticagentsofhuman infections,andcanproducesevereinfectionsinburnpatients.TheliteratureonFusarium
sppinfectionsinpediatricburnpatientsisscarce.
Objectives: Todescribetheclinicalandepidemiologicalfeaturesaswellasoutcomeof Fusa-riumsppinfectionsinpediatricburnpatients.
Patientsandmethods:Retrospective,descriptivestudyofFusariumsppinfectionsina special-izedintensivecareburnunit.
Results:In15patientsFusariumsppinfectionswerediagnosed.Medianagewas48months. Directfireinjurywasobservedintenpatients.Themedianaffectedburnsurfaceareawas 45%.Twelvepatientshadafullthicknessburn.FourteenpatientshadaGarcesIndex≥3. Fungalinfectiondevelopedatamedianof11daysafterburninjury.Fungiwereisolated fromburnwoundin14patientsandfromtheboneinonepatient.
AmphotericinBwasthedrugofchoicefortreatmentfollowedbyvoriconazole.Median timeoftreatmentcompletionwas23days.Onepatient(7%)diedoffungalinfection-related causes.
Conclusion: In our series Fusarium spp was an uncommon pathogen in severely burnt patients.Theburnwoundwasthemostcommonsiteofinfectionandmortalitywaslow.
©2016ElsevierEditoraLtda.ThisisanopenaccessarticleundertheCCBY-NC-ND license(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
Introduction
Infectionisthemostcommonandseverecauseofmorbidity andmortalityinburnpatients.1Thelongersurvivalofthis
populationhasincreasedthefrequencyoffungalinfections.
∗ Correspondingauthor.
E-mailaddress:margris2@yahoo.com.ar(M.T.Rosanova).
Themostcommonlyisolated speciesisCandidasppandin recenttimestherehasbeenanincreaseinfilamentousfungi suchasAspergillusspp,Mucorspp,andFusariumspp.2Fusarium
spp–afilamentousfungus–isubiquitousintheenvironment andcanbefoundinwaterandinthesoil.3Itmainlyproduces
infections inindividuals withimmunedisorders causedby
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjid.2016.04.004
1413-8670/©2016ElsevierEditoraLtda.ThisisanopenaccessarticleundertheCCBY-NC-NDlicense(http://creativecommons.org/ licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
390
braz j infect dis.2016;20(4):389–392tumors,useofcytostatics,steroids,presenceofdiabetes mel-litus,andHIVinfectionamongothers.Burnpatientsarethe mostcommonlyaffectedimmunocompetenthosts.1,4
CommonlyisolatedFusariumsppareF.solani,F.oxysporum,
F.proliferatum,F.verticilliodes,etc.5
The literature on Fusarium spp infections in pediatric patients with burns is limited. Most publications are case reports of disseminated Fusarium spp infections in cancer patientsorfungalkeratitisinfections.6–8
Theaimofthisstudywastodescribetheepidemiological, clinical,and microbiologicalfeaturesaswell asoutcomeof infectionsduetoFusariumsppinpediatricburnpatients.
Patients
and
methods
Thiswasaretrospective,descriptiveandobservationalstudy ofFusariumsppinfectionsinaspecializedburnintensivecare unitbetweenJanuary2006andMarch2015.
Inclusioncriteria
Allburnpatientswithclinicalandmicrobiologicalevidenceof fungalinfectionbyFusariumsppdocumentedfrom represen-tativesamples,suchasdeepburntissue,and/orblood,and/or othersterilesiteswithpositivecultureswereincluded.
Definition
Clinicalevidencewasdefinedbylocalsignsofinfectionsuch asdrainageofpus,rednessorswellingatthemarginofthe burn, scar separation, localized necrosis, vesicular lesions, and/orpooradherenceofthegraft.
Microbiologicalevidencewas definedbythe isolationof
Fusariumsppindeeptissuesamplesorsterilematerials(blood, purulentmaterials,and/orurine).
Infectiontypes
Infections were defined according to the American Burn Association9:
TheGarces’Index–anindexofpredictionofseverityand mortalitycalculatedasfollows:40−patientage×1 percent-ageburn(iftypeA),×2(iftypeAB),×3(iftypeB).
• 0–60points:Grade1(slightrisk); • 61–90points:Grade2(moderaterisk); • 91–120points:Grade3(severerisk); • >121points:Grade4(criticalrisk).
Depthofburn
• TypeA:superficialburnwitherythemaandhyperalgesia; • TypeAB:pink-whiteintermediate-colorscar,and
hypoalge-sia;
• TypeBor “fullthickness”:deep, white orblack scarand analgesia.
Microbiology
Inadditiontoregularbacteriologicalstudy,allmaterialswere processedformycologicalstudy.
Table1–Patientscharacteristics.
Variable N(IQR) Percentage
(IQR) Patients 15 100 Age 48m(12–108) Malesex 11 73 Burnsurface 45(30–60) Garcesindex>3 9 60 Fullthickness 12 80 Inhalatoryinjury 11 73 Mechanicalrespiratory assistance 13 87
Centralvenouscatheter 15 100
Vesicalcatheter 15 100
Timebetweeninjury
andinfection 11(4–24) Concomitantinfection withbacteria 13 87 Timeoftreatment 23(17–42) Mortality 1 7 Daysofhospitalization 55(22–60)
Results
Atotalof15 patientswereinfectedbyFusariumsppduring thestudyperiod.Themechanismofburnwasdirectfirein10 patients(66%),hotliquidsinfour(27%),andelectricityinone case(7%);87%(n=13)weremale.Medianagewas48months (IQR12–108months).Themedianbodysurfaceareaburned was45%(IQR30–60%).Eightypercentofpatients(n=12)had deepburns(typeB);60%(n=9)hadaGarces’indexof3,33% (n=5)anindexof4,andtheremaining7%(n=1)anindexof2. Themediantimefromburninjurytoonsetoffungal infec-tionwas11days(IQR4–24days).Allpatientshadcentrallines withamediandwelltimeof20days(IQR12–30).Ofallpatients, 87%(n=13)requiredmechanicalventilationwithamedianof 16days(IQR10–30).Themostcommonsiteofmicrobiological isolationwastheburnwoundin15patients(100%)andbonein onepatient(7%).Inonepatient(7%)Fusariumsppwasisolated frombloodcultures.In87%ofcases(n=13)concomitant bac-terialinfectionswerefound.Empiricalantifungaltreatment wasstartedwithamphotericinBdeoxycholatein14patients (93%)andvoriconazoleinonepatient(7%).Allpatientswere switchedtotreatmentwithvoriconazoleaftermicrobiological isolationofFusariumspp.Medianantifungaltreatmentwas23 days(IQR17–42days).Noadverseeventsrelatedtotheuseof antifungalagentswerereported.Thecombinationofmedical treatment usingamphotericinB,voriconazole, andsurgical removal of infectious foci was effective in all cases. The medianlengthofhospitalstaywas55days(IQR22–60days). Onlyonepatient(7%) died,14daysafteradmissiondueto septicshockrelatedtoFusariumsppinfection(Tables1and2).
Discussion
Infections remain the leading cause of mortality in burn patients.1 The use of topical and systemic antimicrobials
alongwithinfection-controlmeasureshasreducedthe inci-denceofbacterialinfections1;however,fungalinfectionshave
brazj infect dis.2016;20(4):389–392
391
Table2–Infectioncharacteristics.
Variable n Percentage
Woundsinfection 15 100
Bloodstream 1 7
Bone 1 7
remainedstableshowinganincidencebetween6and40%in differentseries.1,5,6
Inapreviousstudyconductedatourcenterwereported on 128 infections in 84 patients of which 53 cases (20%) had a documented fungal etiology.4 Some risk factors for
developingfungal infections inburnpatients are extremes of age, large body surface burned (≥40%), inhalation syn-drome,requirementformechanicalventilation,useofbroad spectrumantibiotics, prolonged use ofcentral venous and bladder catheters, presence of diabetes mellitus, and par-enteralnutrition.2,3,10,11
Progressionfrom fungal colonization toinfection ofthe woundisdirectly related tothe body surfacearea burned. Therefore, closemonitoringofpatients withlargesurfaces burned(≥40%)isrecommendedtoestablishearlytherapeutic measures.12
Differentstudiesintheliteraturehavereportedahigher incidenceoffungal infectionsinmoresevereburns.1,3,4,6In
thisseries, themedianbody surfaceareaburned was45%, reflecting theseverity ofthe study sampleathigh risk for the occurrence of fungal infections inline with published literature.6,10
Candida spp is the most frequently involved species in fungalinfectionsinburns.Inrecenttimestheincidenceof fil-amentousfungisuchasAspergillusspp,andtoalesserextent
Mucorspp and Fusarium spp,has increased.2 In aprevious
studyonfungalinfectionsinourcenterthemostfrequently isolated funguswas Candidaalbicans(3.4%).13 In this study
fungal infectionsoccurred from the secondweekof hospi-talization (median 11 days), coinciding with several other reports.2,3,11
Fusariumcanbeisolatedbytissuebiopsiesthatmayshow thepresenceoffilamentousfungiinandaroundvesselsofthe dermis,thrombosis,andtissuenecrosis.Bloodculturesmay bepositivein50–70%ofcasesinimmunocompromisedhost infections.14,15
The most common site of infection is the burn wound.1,3,4,14Inthisstudy100%ofpatientshadinfectionof
theburn woundand onlyone(7%)had bone involvement. Additionally,fungemiawasdetectedinonlyonepatient(7%). Earlytreatmentoflocalizedformsisessentialtoprevent thespreadofFusariumspp.Mortalityrateshavebeenreduced withearlydebridementofinjuriescombinedwithantifungal treatment.15–17
In our burn unit, amphotericin Bdeoxycholate or lipid formulationsareusedasempiricaltreatmentagainst filamen-tousfungi.WhenFusariumsppisisolatedvoriconazoleisthe drugofchoice.Thetotaldurationoftreatmentvaries accord-ingtotheextensionoftheinfection.Somestudiesreporteda treatmentduration ofatleasttwoweeksafterthelast fun-gal isolationcoincidingwith the managementapproach in ourburnunit.2,11,18Mortalityduetofungalinfectionsvaries
between75and90%andisassociatedwithaburnedsurface
areabetween40%and60%.1,10,19Somestudiesfoundno
differ-enceinmortalityratesaccordingtothefungalagentinvolved. Incontrast,thestudybySchaaletal.20foundthatpatients
withAspergillussppinfectionshada30%mortalitywhereas noneofthoseinfectedwithFusariumsppdied,inlinewiththe lowmortalityratefoundinourstudy.
NirPazetal.3reportedan11%mortalityrateinFusarium
sppinfectionsindifferentinmunocompromisedpatientswith ahigherriskinpatientswithburns.
Inourseries,onepatientdiedofsepticshockdueto infec-tion by Fusarium spp, representing a mortality rate of 7% inthe study period,whichislower than that foundinthe literature.11–20
Conclusions
Fusariumsppwasararelyisolatedpathogeninburnedpatients inourunit.Theburnwoundwasthe mostfrequentsiteof isolation.Mortalitywaslow.
Conflicts
of
interest
Theauthorsdeclarenoconflictsofinterest.
r
e
f
e
r
e
n
c
e
s
1.MurrayCK,LooFL,HospenthalDR.Incidenceofsystemic fungalinfectionandrelatedmortalityfollowingsevereburns. Burns.2008;34:1108–12.
2.ChurchD,ElsayedS,ReidO,etal.Burnwoundinfection.Clin MicrobiolRev.2006;19:403–34.
3.Nir-PazR,StrahilevitzJ,ShapiroM,etal.Clinicaland epidemiologicalaspectsofinfectionscausedbyFusarium
species:acollaborativestudyfromIsrael.JClinMicrobiol. 2004;42:3456–61.
4.RosanovaMT,StamboulinD,LedeR.Infeccionesenlosni ˜nos quemados:análisisepidemiológicoydelosfactoresderiesgo. ArchArgentPediatr.2013;111:303–8.
5.LatenserBA.Fusariuminfectionsinburnspatients:acase reportandreviewoftheliterature.JBurnCareRehabil. 2003;24:285–8.
6.LitvinovN,daSilvaMT,vanderHeijdenIM,etal.Anoutbreak ofinvasivefusariosisinachildren’scancerhospital.Clin MicrobiolInfect.2015;21:268.
7.CookeNS,FeigheryC,ArmstrongDKB.CutaneousFusarium solaniinfectioninchildhoodacutelymphoblasticleukaemia. ClinExpDermatol.2009;34:117–9.
8.SongX,XuL,SunS,etal.Pediatricmicrobialkeratitis:a tertiaryhospitalstudy.EurJOphthamol.2012;22:136–41.
9.GreenhalghDG,SaffleJR,HolmesJH,etal.AmericanBurn Associationconsensusconferencetodefinesepsisand infectioninburns.JBurnCareRes.2007;28:776–90.
10.LeeHG,JangJ,ChoeJE,etal.Bloodstreaminfectionsin patientsintheburnintensivecareunit.InfectChemother. 2013;45:194–201.
11.MuhammedM,AnagnostouT,DesalermosA,etal.Fusarium infection:reportof26casesandreviewof97casesfromthe literature.Medicine(Baltim).2013;92:305–16.
12.SchofieldCM,MurrayCK,HorvathEE,etal.Correlationof culturewithhistopathologyinfungalburnwound colonizationandinfection.Burns.2007;33:341–6.
392
braz j infect dis.2016;20(4):389–39213.RosanovaMT,BasilicoH,VillasboasM,etal.Infecciones fúngicasenunaunidaddequemadospediátrica.ArchArgent Pediatr.2011;109:437–44.
14.MartinoP,GastalsiR,RaccahR,etal.Clinicalpatternsof Fusariuminfectionsinimmunocompromisedpatients.J Infect.1994;28Suppl:7–15.
15.SarabahiS,TiwariVK,AroraS,etal.Changingpatternof fungalinfectioninburnpatients.Burns.2012;38:520–8.
16.SoaresdeMacedoJ,SantosJB.Bacterialandfungal colonizationofburnwounds.MemInstOswaldoCruz,RioJ. 2005;100:535–9.
17.GuptaAK,BaranR,SummerbellRC.Fusariuminfectionsof theskin.CurrOpinInfectDis.2000;13:121–8.
18.PerfectJR,MarrKA,WalshTJ,etal.Voriconazoletreatment forlesscommon,emerging,orrefractoryfungalinfections. ClinInfectDis.2003;36:1122–31.
19.DignaniMC,AnaissieE.Humanfusariosis.ClinMicrobiol Infect.2004;10:67–75.
20.SchaalJV,LeclercT,SolerC,etal.Epidemiologyof filamentousfungalinfectionsinburnedpatients:aFrench retrospectivestudy.Burns.2015;41:853–63.