• Nenhum resultado encontrado

Triple, simultaneous, very late coronary stent thrombosis

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Triple, simultaneous, very late coronary stent thrombosis"

Copied!
6
0
0

Texto

(1)

Revista

Portuguesa

de

Cardiologia

Portuguese

Journal

of

Cardiology

www.revportcardiol.org

CASE

REPORT

Triple,

simultaneous,

very

late

coronary

stent

thrombosis

Miguel

Silva

Vieira

,

André

Luz,

Diana

Anjo,

Nuno

Antunes,

Mário

Santos,

Henrique

Carvalho,

Severo

Torres

CardiologyDepartment,SantoAntónioHospital---CentroHospitalardoPorto,Porto,Portugal Received30May2012;accepted4June2012

KEYWORDS

Verylatestent thrombosis; Drug-elutingstents

Abstract Coronary artery stent thrombosis is an uncommon but potentially catastrophic complication. The risk of very late stent thrombosis (VLST) raises important safety issues regardingthe firstgeneration ofdrug-elutingstents (DES).Althoughseveralcomplex mech-anisms for VLST have been suggested and various predictors have been described, its pathophysiologyisnotcompletely understoodanditisnotknownwhetherlonger-termdual antiplatelet therapyreducestherisk.Wepresentarare caseofsimultaneous verylate DES thrombosisinthethreevascularterritories,followingdiscontinuationofantiplatelettherapy sevenyearsafterstentplacement,presentingascardiogenicshock.

© 2012 Sociedade Portuguesa de Cardiologia Published by Elsevier España, S.L. All rights reserved.

PALAVRAS-CHAVE

Trombosemuito tardiadestent; Stentsrevestidos

Trombosetripla,simultânea,muitotardiadestentscoronários

Resumo Atrombosedestentcoronárioéumacomplicac¸ãoraramaspotencialmente catas-trófica.Oriscodetrombosemuitotardiadestent(TMTS)temlevantadoquestõesimportantes sobreaseguranc¸adousodestentsrevestidoscomfármacos(SRF)deprimeiragerac¸ão.Embora sejamváriosecomplexososmecanismosdaTMTSeváriosospreditoresquetêmsidodescritos, asuafisiopatologiaaindanãoestátotalmenteesclarecidaedesconhece-seseoprolongarda terapêuticaantiagreganteduplareduzesserisco.Descrevemosumcasorarodetrombosemuito tardiadeSRFocorrendoemsimultâneonostrêsterritóriosvasculares,apósinterrupc¸ãoda ter-apêuticaantiagregante,seteanosapósimplantac¸ãodosstents,apresentando-secomochoque cardiogénico.

© 2012 Sociedade Portuguesa de Cardiologia.Publicado por Elsevier España, S.L. Todosos direitosreservados.

Correspondingauthor.

E-mailaddress:[email protected](M.S.Vieira).

Case

report

Wepresentthecaseof a49-year-oldmanwithapast his-toryofnon-Qwave myocardialinfarction(MI)sevenyears 0870-2551/$–seefrontmatter©2012SociedadePortuguesadeCardiologiaPublishedbyElsevierEspaña,S.L.Allrightsreserved.

(2)

2,5 x 33mm 3,0 x 18mm 3,0 x 33mm 2,5 x 18mm

A

B

D

E

C

F

Figure1 Top:Leftanteriorobliqueviewofthemid-rightcoronaryarterycriticalstenosis(PanelA),rightanteriorobliquecranial viewofthemid-left anteriordescendingarterycriticalstenosis(Panel B)andrightanteriorobliquecaudal viewofthesecond obtusemarginalcriticalstenosis(PanelC).Bottom:AngiographicresultafterPCIwithballoonpredilatationandimplantationof sirolimus-elutingstents(arrowheads)(D---F).

before,withthree-vesseldisease (right dominant circula-tion), who underwent complete functional percutaneous revascularization with sirolimus-eluting stents (Figure 1). Hehadan unremarkablefollow-upundermedicaltherapy, having completed12 monthsof dualantiplatelet therapy (DAPT), with no residual angina, normal left ventricular ejection fraction and good functional capacity, although withsuboptimalcontrolofcardiovascularriskfactors (dys-lipidemiaandoverweight).Noin-stentrestenosiswasnoted inelective angiographyatsixmonthsandhehadno resid-ualischemiaonexerciseradionuclidemyocardialperfusion imagingperformedsixyearslater.

Sevenyearslater,thepatientwasadmittedwithacute ST-segmentelevationmyocardialinfarction,eightdaysafter stopping aspirin. Also notable was a gout attack in the week of the cardiac event. He presented with typical severeretrosternalchestpainandST-segmentelevationin anteroseptalandinferiorleads(Figure2).Hewas immedi-atelytransferredtothecardiaccatheterizationlaboratory, witha door-to-balloontimeof 40minutes andKillip class Ionadmission. Simultaneousstentthrombosis (ST)in the threecoronaryarteries wasnoted onfirst contrast

injec-tion(Figure3).Thrombusaspirationandballoonangioplasty

of the left anterior descending coronary artery achieved onlysuboptimalreperfusion.No-reflowandbail-outensued, despite antithrombotic pharmacotherapy (aspirinand clo-pidogrelloadingdoses,unfractionatedheparinandplatelet glycoproteinIIb/IIIa receptorinhibitors)andintracoronary adenosine administration. Right ventricular pacing was needed due tocomplete atrioventricularblock. Advanced cardiovascularlifesupportwasthenstarteddueto hemody-namiccollapseandcardiacasystole.Whilecardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) was being performed, right coronary arterycatheterizationwasattemptedthrougha contralat-eral femoral approach with thrombus aspiration, balloon angioplasty and stent implantation. Despite intra-aortic balloon pump placement and prolonged CPR, the patient developed several episodes of ventricular fibrillation and incessant pulselessventriculartachycardia and eventually expired.

Discussion

Coronary artery stent thrombosis is a rare but poten-tial catastrophic complication of percutaneous coronary

(3)

I II aVR aVL aVF III V1 V2 V3 V4 V5 V6

Figure2 ElectrocardiogramonadmissionwithST-segmentelevationinanteroseptalandinferiorleads.

Figure3 Dramaticsimultaneous verylatestentthrombosisoftheleft anteriordescending,secondobtusemarginalandright coronaryarteries(AandB).Notetheextensivepositiveremodelingwithseveralaneurysmsinthenon-stentedproximalright coro-naryarteryreferencesegments(BandD).Suboptimalreperfusionandno-reflowphenomenonafterthrombusaspiration,multiple balloondilations,administrationofintracoronaryplateletglycoproteinIIb/IIIareceptorinhibitorsandadenosine,rightventricular endocavitarypacingandintra-aorticballoonpumpcounterpulsation(CandD).

(4)

intervention (PCI), usually presenting assudden death or MI.1,2Moreover,patientswhosurvivetheeventhaveaworse

prognosisandareatincreasedriskofanotherSTin follow-up.3

The risk of very late stent thrombosis (VLST) (occur-ring more than one year after stent placement) raises long-termsafetyconcernsregardingthefirstgenerationof DES(sirolimus-eluting and paclitaxel-eluting stents), even though,comparedwithbaremetalstents,theywereamajor breakthrough, consistently being associated withreduced ratesofangiographicrestenosisandischemia-driventarget vesselrevascularization.4Thereportedcumulativeratesof

definitiveVLST,accordingtotheAcademicResearch Consor-tium definition, vary in the literature depending on the durationoffollow-upused,andareslightlyhigherin obser-vationalstudies.3---8

Delayed neointimal coverage and a hypersensitivity reactiontocomponentsofthedrug-polymer-stent combina-tion,together withongoing vesselinflammation, impaired healing and abnormal remodeling leading to late and very late acquired stent malapposition, have been asso-ciated with VLST, but the precise mechanism is still unknown.9---13 Patient-relatedfactors(includingcompliance

withantiplatelettherapy),proceduralandpost-procedural factors(includingtypeanddurationofantiplatelettherapy) probablyinteractandpredisposethepatienttoST.2,3,10

Endothelial dysfunction has also been described as an adverse consequence following coronary DES implanta-tion, although its clinical significance is still unknown.14

In fact, although DES target vascular smooth muscle cell proliferation and migration (neointimal hyperplasia), the key factors in the development of restenosis, they impair re-endothelialization and promote late in-stent neoatherosclerosis, a new concept whose precise mecha-nism is also unknown, that acts as another substrate for VLST.15,16 This alsoinvolves both proximaland distal

non-stentedreferencesegments and leads todelayed arterial healing, impairment of endothelial nitric oxide synthe-sis and imbalance between endothelium-derived relaxing andcontractingfactors,resultingin athrombogenic envi-ronmentandparadoxical vasoconstrictionof theadjacent segments.10,16Moreover,stent-inducedmechanicalchanges

invesselgeometrymodifyitsresponsetoendothelialinjury andhavebeenlinkedtothepathobiologyofST.17

Tothebestofourknowledge,thisisthefirstreportof aVLST,81monthspost-PCI,simultaneouslyoccurringinthe threecoronaryarteryterritories following discontinuation ofantiplatelettherapy.

The peri-stentaneurysmsdepictedonangiography sug-gestextensivelocalpositivevascular remodeling,aknown late complication after DES deployment which has also been linked to very late acquired stent malapposition andST; a review of the initial PCI showedno procedure-related mechanical problems such as residual dissection thatcouldhaveactedasasubstrateforthefinalextensive remodeling.18---20Furthermore,althoughintravascular

ultra-soundwasnotperformedduetothedramaticcourseofthe event,thepronouncedpositiveremodelingsuggeststhe pos-sibilityofverylatestentmalapposition,anidusforthrombus formation. Unfortunately there was no histopathological analysis of thrombus aspirates to search for eosinophilic infiltrates,whicharecommoninthrombifromverylateDES

thrombosisassociatedwithhypersensitivityreactionstothe drug---polymer---stentcombination,andrelatedtotheextent ofstentmalapposition.10

Severalmechanisms have been implicatedin this posi-tivevascular remodeling,suchasprocedure-relatedacute vessel injury,hypersensitivity reactions tothe stent poly-mercoatings,toxiceffectsofantiproliferativedrugsonthe vessel,andevenfocalinfections.14---21

We hypothesize that a complex interplay of several thrombogenicfactorsprobablyactedtogethertocreatethis ‘‘perfect storm’’scenario thatended inadramatic triple stentthrombosis:significantunderlyingendothelial dysfunc-tion provoking an abnormalresponseto endothelialshear stress, abnormal rheological conditions and possible very lateacquiredstentmalapposition;recentdiscontinuationof antiplatelettherapy(probablyplayingapivotalrole);andan inflammatorystate ---arecentgoutattack,whichhasalso beenlinkedtoacuteMI.22

Ourreporthighlightstheseriousconsequencesof discon-tinuing antiplatelet therapy,even several yearsafter DES deployment and for a brief period. Although the optimal duration ofDAPT afterDES implantationis stillunknown, robust data are only available for up to six months of therapy, and there are other mechanisms not related to discontinuation ofdrug therapy implicated in VLST, anec-dotalcaseslikethisdemonstratethattheremaybenotime limit to theoccurrence of this complication, andlifelong antiplatelettherapyismandatory.2,9---12,23,24

Because there is currently no established method to identify patientsat high risk of VLST,a recognized multi-factorialevent,andthereisnodefinitiveevidenceonthe optimal duration of DAPT, careful surveillance for poten-tial late complications in patients with DES is crucial. Medication compliance, optimization of the PCI tech-nique,quantificationofcoronaryarterydiseasecomplexity by the SYNTAX score, shifting toward functional rather than visual guided angioplasty and thus avoiding unnec-essary procedures,usinginvasive (fractionalflowreserve, intravascular ultrasound, optical coherence tomography, and quantitative coronary angiography after intracoro-nary acetylcholine infusion for evaluation of vasomotor dysfunction) and non-invasive advanced coronary imaging techniques for tailored post-procedure monitoring, may helptoreducetheincidenceofthispotentiallydevastating complication.25---27

The multifactorial nature of ST makes it difficult to predict and neither genotyping for reduced-function cytochrome P2C19 nor platelet function testing currently haveadefiniterole.28

Although new anticoagulant and antiplatelet therapies have the potential to influence future clinical decisions regarding the duration of DAPT, the current approved therapies should not be discontinued ahead of the rec-ommendations in the guidelines. The era of personalized antiplatelettherapyisthereforeeagerlyawaited.

Furthermore,althoughthereappearstobeaclasseffect betweenthedifferentantiproliferativedrugs,thedataon new-generationDES(withthinner,morebiocompatibleand even bioabsorbable polymers, different stent alloys with better flexibility, conformability, and deliverability, and alternative drugs) are encouraging and may reduce this complicationfurther.29,30

(5)

Finally,long-termfollow-upstudiesarerequiredtoassess thesignificanceandmanagementoflateandverylate vas-cular pathologic changes secondary to DES implantation, particularlyin-stentneoatherosclerosis,abnormal vasomo-tion,acquired verylatestent malapposition andcoronary artery aneurysms, and to improve our understanding of endothelialfunction.

Ethical

disclosures

Protection of human and animal subjects.The authors declarethatnoexperimentswereperformedonhumansor animalsforthisstudy.

Confidentialityofdata.Theauthorsdeclarethattheyhave followedtheprotocolsoftheirworkcenteronthe publica-tionofpatientdataandthatallthepatientsincludedinthe studyreceivedsufficientinformationandgavetheirwritten informedconsenttoparticipateinthestudy.

Righttoprivacyandinformedconsent.The authorshave obtained the written informedconsent ofthe patients or subjectsmentionedinthearticle.Thecorrespondingauthor isinpossessionofthisdocument.

Conflicts

of

interest

Theauthorshavenoconflictsofinteresttodeclare.

Appendix

A.

Supplementary

data

Supplementary data associated with this article can be found in the online version at doi:10.1016/j.repc.2012.

06.019.

References

1.StoneGW, Moses JW, EllisSG, et al. Safety and efficacy of sirolimus-andpaclitaxel-elutingcoronarystents.NEnglJMed. 2007;356:998---1008.

2.WindeckerS,MeierB.Latecoronarystentthrombosis. Circula-tion.2007;116:1952---65.

3.Buchanan GL, Basavarajaiah S, Chieffo A. Stent thrombo-sis:incidence,predictors andnew technologies.Thrombosis. 2012;2012:956962.

4.Palmerini T, Biondi-Zoccai G, Della Riva D, et al. Stent thrombosis with drug-eluting and bare-metal stents: evi-dencefroma comprehensivenetworkmeta-analysis.Lancet. 2012;379:1393---402.

5.CutlipDE,Windecker S,MehranR, et al.Clinicalendpoints incoronary stent trials: a casefor standardizeddefinitions. Circulation.2007;115:2344---51.

6.MauriL,HsiehWH,MassaroJM,HoKK,D’AgostinoR,CutlipDE. Stentthrombosisinrandomizedclinicaltrialsofdrug-eluting stents.NEnglJMed.2007;356:1020---9.

7.BavryAA,KumbhaniDJ,HeltonTJ,BorekPP,MoodGR,Bhatt DL.Latethrombosisofdrug-elutingstents:ameta-analysisof randomizedclinicaltrials.AmJMed.2006;119:1056---61. 8.delaTorre-HernandezJM,AlfonsoF,HernandezF,etal.

Drug-elutingstentthrombosis:resultsfromthemulticenterSpanish registryESTROFA(EstudioESpanolsobreTROmbosisdestents FArmacoactivos).JAmCollCardiol.2008;51:986---90.

9.AwataM,KotaniJ,UematsuM,etal.Serialangioscopicevidence ofincompleteneointimalcoverageaftersirolimus-elutingstent implantation:comparisonwithbare-metalstents.Circulation. 2007;116:910---6.

10.CookS,LadichE,NakazawaG,etal.Correlationofintravascular ultrasoundfindingswithhistopathologicalanalysisofthrombus aspiratesinpatientswithverylatedrug-elutingstent thrombo-sis.Circulation.2009;120:391---9.

11. LuscherTF,SteffelJ,EberliFR,etal.Drug-elutingstentand coronarythrombosis:biologicalmechanismsandclinical impli-cations.Circulation.2007;115:1051---8.

12.AjzenbergN,AubryP,HuisseMG,etal.Enhancedshear-induced plateletaggregationinpatientswhoexperiencesubacutestent thrombosis.JAmCollCardiol.2005;45:1753---6.

13.KangSJ,MintzGS, ParkDW,et al. Lateand very late drug-eluting stent malapposition: serial 2-year quantitative IVUS analysis.CircCardiovascInterv.2010;3:335---40.

14.HofmaSH,vanderGiessenWJ,vanDalenBM,etal.Indicationof long-termendothelialdysfunctionaftersirolimus-elutingstent implantation.EurHeartJ.2006;27:166---70.

15.Park SJ, Kang SJ, Virmani R, Nakano M, Ueda Y. In-stent neoatherosclerosis.Afinalcommonpathwayoflatestent fail-ure.JAmCollCardiol.2012;59:2051---7.

16.JonerM,FinnAV,FarbA,etal.Pathologyofdrug-elutingstents inhumans:delayedhealingandlatethromboticrisk.JAmColl Cardiol.2006;48:193---202.

17.KoskinasKC,ChatzizisisYS,AntoniadisAP,GiannoglouGD.Role of endothelialshear stress in stent restenosis and thrombo-sis:pathophysiologicmechanismsandimplicationsforclinical translation.JAmCollCardiol.2012;59:1337---49.

18.KangKW,KoYG,ShinDH,etal.Impactofpositiveperi-stent vascular remodeling after sirolimus-eluting and paclitaxel-elutingstentimplantationon5-yearclinicaloutcomes.CircJ. 2012;76:1102---8.

19.HassanAKM,BergheanuSC,StijnenT,etal.Latestent malap-positionriskishigherafterdrug-elutingstentcomparedwith bare-metal stentimplantation and associateswithlatestent thrombosis.EurHeartJ.2010;31:1172---80.

20.AlfonsoF,Pérez-VizcaynoMJ,RuizM,etal.Coronaryaneurysms after drug-eluting stent implantation: clinical, angiographic, and intravascular ultrasound findings. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;53:2053---60.

21.VirmaniR,GuagliumiG,FarbA,etal.Localizedhypersensitivity andlatecoronarythrombosissecondarytoasirolimus-eluting stent:shouldwebecautious?Circulation.2004;109:701---5. 22.Krishnan E, Baker JF, Furst DE, Schumacher HR. Gout and

the risk of acute myocardial infarction. Arthritis Rheum. 2006;54:2688---96.

23.Task Force on MyocardialRevascularization of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association forCardio-ThoracicSurgery(EACTS),EuropeanAssociationfor Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI),Wijns W, etal.Guidelinesonmyocardialrevascularization.EurHeartJ. 2010;31:2501---55.

24.ValgimigliM,CampoG,MontiM,etal.Short-versuslong-term durationofdual-antiplatelettherapyaftercoronarystenting:a randomizedmulticentertrial.Circulation.2012;125:2015---26. 25.Serruys PW, Morice MC, Kappetein AP, et al. Percutaneous

coronary intervention versus coronary-artery bypass grafting for severecoronary arterydisease. NEngl JMed. 2009;360: 961---72.

26.Park SJ, Ahn JM, Kang SJ. Paradigm shift to functional angioplasty: new insights for fractional flow reserve- and intravascular ultrasound-guidedpercutaneous coronary inter-vention.Circulation.2011;124:951---7.

27.Aoki J, Kirtane A, Leon MB, Dangas G. Coronary artery aneurysmsafterdrug-elutingstentimplantation.JACC Cardio-vascInterv.2008;1:14---21.

(6)

28.Krishna V, Diamond GA, Kaul S. Do platelet function test-ing and genotyping improve outcome in patients treated with antithrombotic agents? The role of platelet reactivity and genotype testing in the prevention of atherothrom-botic cardiovascular events remains unproven. Circulation. 2012;125:1288---303[discussion1303].

29.Sarno G, Lagerqvist B, Fröbert O, et al. Lower risk of stent thrombosis and restenosis with unrestricted use

of ‘new-generation’ drug-eluting stents: a report from the nationwideSwedishCoronaryAngiographyandAngioplasty Reg-istry(SCAAR).EurHeartJ.2012;33:606---13.

30.Räber L, Magro M, Stefanini GG, et al. Very late coronary stent thrombosis of a newer-generation everolimus-eluting stent compared with early-generationdrug-eluting stents: a prospectivecohortstudy.Circulation.2012;125:1110---21.

Imagem

Figure 1 Top: Left anterior oblique view of the mid-right coronary artery critical stenosis (Panel A), right anterior oblique cranial view of the mid-left anterior descending artery critical stenosis (Panel B) and right anterior oblique caudal view of the
Figure 3 Dramatic simultaneous very late stent thrombosis of the left anterior descending, second obtuse marginal and right coronary arteries (A and B)

Referências

Documentos relacionados

4 - One year and five months after CYPHER stent placement, a new coronariography disclosed an intra-stent coronary aneurysm in the left marginal branch.

This case report of a patient who underwent multiple stent implants in whom late thrombosis occurred in the Infinnium stent associated with the restenosis of the Taxus stent, without

Patients undergoing a me- tallic ureteral stent placement, in the management of chronic ureteral obstruction, had an initial stenting using a polymer ureteral stent to ensu- re

Extravascular stent management for migration of left renal vein endovascular stent in nutcracker syndrome. A stranger in the heart: LRV

Frequency and predictors of stent thrombosis after percutaneous coronary intervention in acute myocardial infarction. Delayed arterial healing and increased late stent thrombosis

A comparison of the side-by-side and stent-in-stent groups revealed no significant differences with respect to the rates of successful placement, successful drainage,

The late follow -up of patients with complex coronary lesions treated with the MGuard TM stent demonstrated low rates of target lesion revascularization and stent

Despite the angiographic diagnosis of very late stent thrombosis, optical coherence tomography revealed that the acute myocardial infarction was caused by rupture of an