RevBrasAnestesiol.2017;67(3):311---313
REVISTA
BRASILEIRA
DE
ANESTESIOLOGIA
PublicaçãoOficialdaSociedadeBrasileiradeAnestesiologia www.sba.com.brCLINICAL
INFORMATION
Sphenopalatine
ganglion
block
for
postdural
puncture
headache
in
ambulatory
setting
José
Miguel
Cardoso
∗,
Miguel
Sá,
Rita
Grac
¸a,
Hugo
Reis,
Liliana
Almeida,
Célia
Pinheiro,
Duarte
Machado
CentroHospitalardeTrás-os-MonteseAltoDouro,DepartamentodeAnestesiologiaeTerapêuticadaDor,VilaReal,Portugal
Received7July2016;accepted12September2016 Availableonline1October2016
KEYWORDS
Sphenopalatine
ganglionblock;
Postduralpuncture
headache
Abstract
Backgroundandobjectives: Postdural puncture headache (PDPH)is acommon complication followingsubarachnoidblockadeanditsincidencevarieswiththesizeoftheneedleusedandthe needledesign.Suportivetherapyistheusualinitialapproach.Epiduralbloodpatch(EBP)isthe gold-standardwhensupportivetherapyfailsbuthassignificantrisksassociated.Sphenopalatine ganglionblock(SPGB)maybeasaferalternative.
Casereport: We observed a 41 year-old female patient presenting with PDPH after a sub-arachnoidblockadeaweekbefore.Weadministrated1lofcrystalloids,Dexamethasone4mg, parecoxib40mg,acetaminophen1gandcaffeine500mgwithoutsignificantreliefafter2hours. WeperformedabilateralSPGBwithacotton-tippedapplicatorsaturatedwith0.5% Levobupi-vacaine understandard ASA monitoring. Symptomsrelief was reported 5minutes after the block.Thepatientwasmonitoredforanhourafterwhichshewasdischargedandprescribed acetaminophen1gandibuprofen400mgevery8hoursforthefollowing2days.Shewas con-tactedonthenextdayandagainafteraweekreportingnopaininbothsituation.
Conclusions: SPGBmayattenuatecerebralvasodilationinducedbyparasympatheticstimulation transmittedthroughneuronsthathavesynapsesinthesphenopalatineganglion.Thiswouldbe inagreementwiththeMonro-Kellieconceptandwouldexplainwhycaffeineandsumatriptan canhavesomeeffectinthetreatmentofPDPH.
Apparently, SPGBhasafaster onsetthanEBPwith bettersafetyprofile.Wesuggest that patientspresentingwithPDPHshouldbeconsideredprimarilyforSPGB.Patientsmayhavea rescueEBPifneeded.
©2016SociedadeBrasileiradeAnestesiologia.Publishedby ElsevierEditoraLtda.Thisisan openaccessarticleundertheCCBY-NC-NDlicense( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
∗Correspondingauthor.
E-mail:[email protected](J.M.Cardoso). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjane.2016.09.003
312 J.M.Cardosoetal.
PALAVRAS-CHAVE
Bloqueiodogânglio
esfenopalatino;
Cefaleiapós-punc¸ão
dural
Bloqueiodogânglioesfenopalatinoparacefaleiapós-punc¸ãoduralemcontexto
deambulatório
Resumo
Justificativaeobjetivos: Cefaleiapós-punc¸ãodural (CPPD)éuma complicac¸ãocomumapós bloqueiosubaracnoideoesuaincidênciavariadeacordocomotamanhoedesenhodaagulha utilizada.Geralmente,aterapiadeapoioéaabordageminicial.Otampãosanguíneoperidural (TSP)éopadrãodeterapiaquandoaterapiadeapoiofalha,maspossuiriscossignificativos associados.Obloqueiodogânglioesfenopalatino(BGEP)podeserumaalternativamaissegura.
Relatodecaso:Atendemosumapacientede41anosdeidade,apresentando-secomCPPDapós umbloqueiosubaracnoideoumasemanaantes.Administramoscristaloides(1L),dexametasona (4mg),parecoxib(40mg),acetaminofeno(1g)ecafeína(500mg),semalíviosignificativoapós 2horas.Realizamosumbloqueiobilateraldogânglioesfenopalatino,usandoumaplicadorcom pontadealgodãosaturadacomlevobupivacaínaa0,5%sobmonitorac¸ãopadrãoASA.Oalívio dossintomasfoirelatado5minutosapósobloqueio.Apacientefoimonitoradaporumahora edepoisrecebeualtacomprescric¸ãodeacetaminofeno(1g)eibuprofeno(400mg)acada8 horasparaosdoisdiasseguintes.Apacientefoicontatadanodiaseguinteenovamenteapós umasemanae,emambososcontatos,relatounãosentirdor.
Conclusões:OBGEPpodeteratenuadoavasodilatac¸ãocerebralinduzidapeloestímulo paras-simpáticotransmitidoatravésdosneurôniosquepossuemsinapsesnogânglioesfenopalatino. EssemecanismoestariadeacordocomoconceitodeMonro-Kellieeexplicariaporqueacafeína eosumatriptanopodemteralgumefeitonotratamentodaCPPD.
Aparentemente,oBGEPtemuminíciomaisrápidoqueodoTSP,comummelhorperfilde seguranc¸a.SugerimosqueospacientesqueseapresentamcomCPPDdevamserconsiderados primeiroparaBGEP.OspacientespodemsersubmetidosaumTSPderesgate,casonecessário. ©2016SociedadeBrasileiradeAnestesiologia.PublicadoporElsevierEditoraLtda.Este ´eum artigoOpen Accesssobumalicenc¸aCCBY-NC-ND( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
Background
and
objectives
PostduralPunctureHeadacheisacommoncomplication fol-lowingsubarachnoidblockade.Itsincidencevaries greatly accordingtotheusedneedlesizeandtheneedledesign.It usuallypresentsasanintensefrontalandoccipitalheadache but other areas may alsobe affected.1 The painis exac-erbatedbyupright positionandisrelievedby lyingdown, which is a hallmark.2 Other symptoms have also been reported including nausea and vomiting, vertigo, hearing loss and even visual disturbances. Despite approximately 90% of PDPH happening in the first 3 days after a dural puncture,itsonsetmaybedelayedforalmost2weeks.1
TheQuinckeneedleisoneofthemostusedspinalneedles worldwideandithasasharpandcuttingtip.Theincidence ofPDPH usingQuincke needles mayvaryfrom 0.4%up to 36% depending of its size. Pencil-point needles may have lowerincidenceofPDHP.1Rehydration,non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, acetaminophen, low dose corticoids, caffeineand even sumatriptan are all part of supportive therapy which may obviate the need for moreaggressive therapydespiteincompleterelief.3
TheEBPiscurrentlythestandardofcareafterfailureof pharmacologicaltherapiesbutitisnotdevoidedof signifi-cantrisks(meningitis,seizures,motorandsensorydeficits, etc.).4SomereportsoftransnasalSPGBhavebeenemerging forthetreatmentofPDPH.5
Case
report
Weobserveda41 year-oldfemalepatientpresentingwith PDPHafterasubarachnoidblockadewitha27gaugeQuincke needle for a tension-free vaginal tape obturator a week before.Theintenseholocraneaneheadachehadstartedat the nightofsurgery andit wasaggravated bytheupright positionwithreliefbylyingdown.Thepatientalsoreferred nauseaandvomitingforthelastweek.Noneckstiffnesswas found.WeproposedabrainComputedTomography(CT)scan whichourpatientrefusedduetohavinganinfantathome fromwhomshedidnotfeelcomfortablebeingseparated.
Sphenopalatineganglionblockforpostduralpunctureheadache 313
8hforthefollowing2days.Shewascontactedthenextday andagainafteraweekreportingnopaininbothsituation.
Conclusions
DespitePDPHbeingusuallyacleardiagnosisfromthehistory ofaduralpunctureandtheclinicalfindings,otherdiagnosis must be considered ranging from migraine to meningi-tis,intracranialhaemorrhage,centralvenousthrombosisor cerebraltumor.1Therewasnoprevioushistoryofmigraine. Theonsetandlackofprogressionofneurologicalsymptoms played against meningitis and intracranial haemorrhage wouldlikelypresentwithmoredramaticfeatures.We pro-posedabrainCT-scantoexcludefor othercauses butour patientrefusedit.
TheMonro-Kellieconceptstatesthattheintracranial vol-umemustremainfixed.Therefore,ifthereisacerebrospinal fluidleakageduetoaduralpuncture,theotherintracranial constituents(bloodandbraintissue)wouldhavetoincrease itsvolumesothatthe intracranialpressureand the cere-bralperfusionpressurewouldremaininthenormalrange. Sincethebraintissueisasolidconstituentwithlow capac-itytoexpanditsvolumeinanacutefashion,theremaining possibilityisfortheintracranialbloodvolumetoincrease, secondarytovasodilation.1
An hypothesis is that SPGB may attenuated cere-bral vasodilation induced by parasympathetic stimulation transmitted through neurons that have synapses in the sphenopalatineganglion.This wouldbeinagreementwith theMonro-Kellie conceptandwould alsoexplainwhy caf-feineandsumatriptancanhavesomeeffectinthetreatment ofPDPH.
Regardingwhatwasalreadydescribedelsewhere,4,5SPGB hasapparentlyafaster onsetthan EBPwithbettersafety profile. Despite obvious contraindication in patients with basilar skullfractures, we can argue that SPGB can walk through the many contraindications for an EPD. Also, by beinganon-invasivetechnique,littleworriesmustbegiven in the case of pyrexia, hyperleukemia or know infection anywhereelsethanthenasopharynx.
WesuggestthatpatientspresentingwithPDPHshouldbe consideredprimarilyforSPGB,duetosafetyofthe proce-dure.PatientsmayhavearescueEBPifneeded.
Conflicts
of
interest
Theauthorsdeclarenoconflictsofinterest.
References
1.Turnbull DK, Shepherd DB. Post-dural puncture headache: pathogenesis, prevention and treatment. Br J Anaesth. 2003;91:718---29.
2.Weir EC. The sharp end of the dural puncture. Br Med J. 2000;320:127---8.
3.Flaatten H, Rodt S, RoslandJ, et al. Postoperative headache in young patients after spinal anaesthesia. Anaesthesia. 1987;42:202---5.
4.Kardash K, Morrow F,Beique F.Seizures afterepidural blood patch withundiagnosed subdural hematoma.Reg Anesth Pain Med.2002;27:433---6.