h tt p : / / w w w . b j m i c r o b i o l . c o m . b r /
Environmental
Microbiology
Mangrove
endophyte
promotes
reforestation
tree
(Acacia
polyphylla
)
growth
Renata
Assis
Castro
a,b,
Manuella
Nóbrega
Dourado
c,∗,
Jaqueline
Raquel
de
Almeida
a,
Paulo
Teixeira
Lacava
d,
André
Nave
e,
Itamar
Soares
de
Melo
f,
João
Lucio
de
Azevedo
a,b,
Maria
Carolina
Quecine
aaUniversityofSãoPaulo,EscolaSuperiordeAgricultura“LuizdeQueiroz”,DepartmentofGenetics,Piracicaba,SP,Brazil bUniversityofSãoPaulo,CenterforNuclearEnergyinAgriculture(CENA),Piracicaba,SP,Brazil
cUniversityofSãoPaulo,BiomedicalScienceInstitute,DepartmentofMicrobiology,SãoPaulo,SP,Brazil
dFederalUniversityofSãoCarlos(UFSCar),CenterforBiologicalandHealthSciences,DepartmentofMorphologyandPathology,São
Carlos,SP,Brazil
eBIOFLORAComercialLTDA,Piracicaba,SP,Brazil
fEMBRAPAEnvironment,LaboratoryofEnvironmentalMicrobiology,Jaguariuna,SP,Brazil
a
r
t
i
c
l
e
i
n
f
o
Articlehistory:
Received23August2016 Accepted19April2017 Availableonline19July2017 AssociateEditor:WelingtonAraújo
Keywords:
Endophyticbacteria IAA
Phosphorusandplantgrowth promotingbacteria(PGPB)
a
b
s
t
r
a
c
t
Mangrovesareecosystemslocatedinthetransitionzonebetweenlandandseathatserve asapotentialsourceofbiotechnologicalresources.Brazil’sextensivecoastcontainsoneof thelargestmangroveforestsintheworld(encompassinganareaof25,000km2alongallthe
coast).Endophyticbacteriawereisolatedfromthefollowingthreeplantspecies:Rhizophora mangle,LagunculariaracemosaandAvicennianitida.Alargenumberoftheseisolates,115in total,wereevaluatedfortheirabilitytofixnitrogenandsolubilizephosphorous.Bacteria thattestedpositiveforbothofthesetestswereexaminedfurthertodeterminetheirlevel ofindoleaceticacidproduction.Twostrainswithhighindoleaceticacidproductionwere selectedforuseasinoculantsforreforestationtrees,andthenthegrowthoftheplantswas evaluatedunderfieldconditions.ThebacteriumPseudomonasfluorescens(strainMCR1.10) hadalowphosphorussolubilizationindex,whilethisindexwashigherintheotherstrain used,Enterobactersp.(strainMCR1.48).WeusedthereforestationtreeAcaciapolyphylla.The resultsindicatethatinoculationwiththeMCR1.48endophyteincreasesAcaciapolyphylla
shootdrymass,demonstratingthatthisstraineffectivelypromotestheplant’sgrowthand fitness,whichcanbeusedintheseedlingproductionofthistree.Therefore,wesuccessfully screenedthebiotechnologicalpotentialofendophyteisolatesfrommangrove,withafocus onplantgrowthpromotion,andselectedastrainabletoprovidelimitednutrientsand hormonesforinplantgrowth.
©2017SociedadeBrasileiradeMicrobiologia.PublishedbyElsevierEditoraLtda.Thisis anopenaccessarticleundertheCCBY-NC-NDlicense(http://creativecommons.org/
licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
∗ Correspondingauthorat:DepartmentofMicrobiology,InstituteofBiomedicalScience,UniversityofSãoPaulo,Av.Prof.LineuPrestes,
1374–Ed.BiomédicasII,05508-900Piracicaba,SP,Brazil. E-mail:[email protected](M.N.Dourado).
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjm.2017.04.002
1517-8382/©2017SociedadeBrasileiradeMicrobiologia.PublishedbyElsevierEditoraLtda.ThisisanopenaccessarticleundertheCC BY-NC-NDlicense(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
Introduction
Mangrovesareanimportantecosystemintropicalbiomesthat occupyseveralmillion hectaresofcoastal areaworldwide.1
Brazilpossessesoneofthelargestmangroveforests,covering an area of 25.000km2 all along the coast. This
ecosys-tem is located in the transition zone between land and sea2 and is characterized by periodic flooding, resulting
in a unique environment with few plant species. Brazil-ianmangrovesprimarilycomprise the followingthree tree species: Rhizophora mangle, Laguncularia racemosa and Avi-cennia sp.3 Furthermore, the mangroves harbor a diverse
groupofmicroorganisms.4,5 Several studieshaveexamined
the microbial community of mangroves by using metage-nomic approaches to access the microorganisms involved in carbon,6 nitrogen7 and sulfer8 metabolism. Despite the
high microbial diversity of mangroves, estimates suggest thatlessthan5%ofspeciesinthisenvironmenthavebeen described.5
Moreover,the high diversityof culturablebacteria3 and
culturable endophytic fungi9 within the Brazilian
man-groves has not yet been explored. Few studies focus on the biotechnological potential of culturable mangrove iso-lates. Castro10 screened for enzymes for use in industrial
processes, such as amylase, esterase, lipase, protease and endoglucanase.Thislargeamountofmicrobialdiversitycan beexploitedtoimprove cropscience sincethe microorgan-isms produce phytohormones, such as indole acetic acid (IAA),enzymes,andantimicrobialmolecules,andsolubilize phosphate in the host plant.11,12 In addition, these
orga-nismscanfixnitrogen13 andincreasedroughtresistance.14
More recently, the high tolerance of these microorganism to heavy metal was described15,16 in addition to
char-acteristics that are important to the promotion of plant growth.
Bacteriathatexhibit thesefeatures canbeused to pro-mote the growth of different plant species such as corn, soybeans,andsugarcaneaswellasarborealspecies.17These
beneficial characteristics of the plant–microbe interactions canbeusedinotherplants.Cross-colonizationiscommon in nature in which the same bacterium can colonize dif-ferent host plants. One example of cross-colonization is
PantoeaagglomeransisolatedfromEucalyptusgrandis,whichis ableto colonizeand promoteplant growth insugarcane.12
However, there are few studies evaluating the effects of bacterialinoculationintrees.18ThetreespeciesAcacia
poly-phylla, of the Leguminosae family, commonly known as “monjoleiro”in Brazil, iswidely used for the reforestation of degraded areas due to its ability to fix nitrogen19 and
improve degradedsoils, thus decreasing costsand benefit-ting the environment.20 Therefore, the aim of this study
istoidentifyand analyze the biotechnological potentialof endophyticbacteriaisolatedfromaBrazilianmangrove envi-ronment and select strains able to promotethe growth of
A.polyphylla.
Materials
and
methods
Endophyteisolationsites
MangroveforestsampleswerepreviouslycollectedfromSão Paulo state, Brazil, as described by Castro.10 The
follow-ingthreelocationswereassessed:(A)theBertiogalocation, whichwascontaminatedbyoilspills;(B)theuncontaminated Bertioga location, withanthropogenic impacts; and (C) the uncontaminatedCananéialocation,withlowanthropogenic impacts.Thefollowingthreemangrovespecieswereassessed: (1)R.mangle,(2)L.racemosaand(3)Avicenniasp.Theoilspill in Bertioga occurred approximately 20 years ago, and the anthropogenic impacts (domesticand industrialsewer) are stilloccurringinBertiogaatbothlocationssampled.6,10
From the whole mangrovebacterial collection, we ran-domlyselected115isolatesthatwereendophyticallyisolated fromthebranchesofmangroveplantsbelongingtotheculture collectionoftheLaboratoryofBacterialGenetics Microorgan-ism,SchoolofAgricultureLuizdeQueiroz(Esalq).3,10
Selectionofendophytes:nitrogenfixation
We started our screening by evaluating the ability of the randomly selected 115 strainsto fixatmospheric nitrogen. Qualitative assays were performed using the process of Liba.21Thestrainswereinoculatedintubescontaining10mL
semi-solidNFbmedium(5gL−1malicacid,0.5gL−1K 2HPO4,
0.2gL−1 MgSO
4.7H2O, 0.1gL−1 NaCl, 0.01gL−1 CaCl2·2H2O,
and 4mL 1.64% Fe-EDTA), 2mL 0.5% bromothymol blue, 2mL micronutrients (0.2gL−1 Na
2MoO4·2H2O, 0.235gL−1
MnSO4·H2O, 0.28gL−1 H3BO3, and 0.008gL−1 CuSO4·5H2O),
and1.75gL−1agar.Bacterialgrowthwasevaluatedafter72h
ofincubationat28◦Cinthedark.Theformationofagrowth
disc inthe culturemediumindicatedatmosphericnitrogen fixationbythebacterialstrains.Thisprocedurewasrepeated fivetimesforconfirmation.
Selectionofendophytephosphatesolubilization
Strainsthatcouldsolubilizeinorganicphosphatewere iden-tifiedbyaquantitativetest.Thistestinvolvedobservingthe presenceofahaloafterbacterialcultivationonmedium sup-plemented withCa3(PO4)2 aftersevendaysofincubationat
28◦C.Theresultswerequantifiedbyestimatingthehalosize
(cm)anddividingitbythecolonysize(cm)togeneratea sol-ubilizationindex(SI).22
SelectionofendophytesthatproduceIAA
Thestrainsthattestedpositiveforphosphatesolubilization andnitrogenfixationweretestedfortheirabilitytoproduce IAA.ThequantitativeIAAproductionwasevaluatedusingthe PattenandGlick23methodwithmodifications.Thebacterial
(Difco,Livonia,USA)supplementedwithl-tryptophan(5mM) andincubatedat28◦Cfor48hinthedark.Triplicatecultures
werecentrifuged(5min,10,000×g,atroomtemperature),and 1.5mLSalkowskireagent24wasaddedto1.5mLofthe
super-natant.Thismixturewasincubatedfor20mininthedarkat roomtemperatureandanalyzedusingaspectrophotometer (520nm;Ultrospec3000,Amersham-PharmaciaBiotech).The absorbancevaluesobtainedwereinterpolatedinastandard curvetodeterminetheIAAconcentration.
Identificationofstrainsbypartialsequencingofthe16S rDNA
The identification of 38 bacterial strains able to fix nitro-gen,solubilizephosphorusandproduceIAAwasperformed bypartialsequencingof16SrDNA.Theamplificationof16S rDNAwasperformeddirectlyfrombacterialcoloniesgrown onsolid TSAmedium(10%)(Difco,Livonia, USA)usingthe primers R1387 (5′-CGGTGTGTACAAGGCCCGGGAACG-3′) and
PO27F(GAGAGTTTGATCCTGGCTCAG-5′–3′).25
The16SrDNAgenePCRproducts(approximately1500bp) werepurifiedbythepolyethyleneglycolmethodofLis26and
sequencedattheInstituteoftheHumanGenome(USP,São Paulo,Brazil).ThesequenceswereevaluatedwithBLASTn27
againstthedatabaseoftheGenBankDevelopmentNational CenterforBiotechnologyInformationwebsite.
Sequences were deposited in GenBank under the fol-lowing access numbers: KF356429–KF356431, KF356438, KF356439, KF356444, KF356453, KF356454, KF356457, KF356459,KF356462,KF356465andKM438481–KM438506. Growthpromotionoftheseedlingsofthereforestation angiospermtreeA.polyphylla
Weselectedtwostrainsthatpresentedpositiveresultsforall ofthetestsperformed,includingphosphorussolubilization, nitrogenfixationandIAAproduction.Bothstrainsproduced thehighestamountofIAAofthebacteriastudied.However, onestrainhadahighphosphoroussolubilizationindexvalue whiletheotherhadalowvalueforthisindex.Theselected bacteriaweregrowninliquidTSBculturemediumand incu-batedfor24hat28◦Cat150rpm.Theopticaldensity(600nm)
wasadjustedto108cellsmL−1.Theplantgrowthassayswere
performedinthereforestationBiofloraCompanylocatedin Piracicaba,SãoPaulo,Brazil.Theexperimentwasconducted inaplantnurserywhoseinternaltemperaturesrangedfrom 20to30◦Cduringthisperiod.Thetreatmentswereasfollows:
I,seedlingsofA.polyphyllauninoculatedandunfertilized;II, seedlingsuninoculatedandfertilized(usingForthSolúveis Ini-cial;ForthAquaMicrosandForthAquaCalcio,Tiete,Brazil); III,seedlingsinoculatedwithPseudomonasfluorescens(strain MCR1.10);IV,seedlingsinoculatedwithEnterobactersp.(strain MCR1.48); V, seedlings inoculated withP. fluorescens (strain MCR1.10) and Enterobacter sp. (strainMCR1.48) consortium. The treatments were performed in a completely random-izeddesignwith25repetitions(1plantperpot).Treatments inoculated withbacteria (III, IVand V) were notfertilized. Eachinoculatedsamplereceiveda1.0mLsuspensionof108
cellsmL−1,andtheun-inoculatedcontrolsweretreatedwith
1.0mLofsterilewateronly.Theinoculationwithbacteriawas
performedbyaddingthebacterialsuspensiontothesubstrate. Afterinoculation,theseedlingsweremaintainedintheplant nurseryfor60days.Afterthisperiod,theseedlingswere col-lected and washed in water. Then, the rootsystems were separatedfromtheshoot,andthedrymassofrootsandshoots fromtheseedlingsweremeasuredtoevaluateplantgrowth promotion.
Statisticalanalysis
Dataweresubjectedtoanalysisofvariance,andmeanswere comparedbytheScottKnotttestforIAAproductionand phos-phorussolubilizationindex(<0.05)andtheTukeyTestforplant experiments(<0.05).Statisticalanalyseswereperformedwith Rsoftware(version3.0.2).
Results
Selectionofendophytes:nitrogenfixationandPhosphate solubilization
In the nitrogenfixation test, 33%ofthe 115 strains exam-ined(38)wereabletogrowinthe mediumfreeofnitrogen withatypicalsub-surfacegrowth,indicatingtheirabilityto fixnitrogen.Thismicroaerophilicgrowthbehaviorresultedin achangeofcoloroftheculturemediumfrombluetogreen toyellow. Thiscolorchange wascausedbychanges inthe mediumpHprobablyduetoacidicmoleculesreleasedbythe isolatetested.
All115strainsexaminedproducedahaloduringthe phos-phatesolubilization test,indicating that theywere all able to solubilize inorganic phosphate. The highest rates were observed in the genera Pantoea (MCL2.66), and the lowest rateswereobservedinthegeneraSphingosinicella(MCL2.68),
Xanthomonas (MCA2.20), Ochrobactrum (MBR2.28) and Bacil-lus(MBIA2.43,MCR2.51,MBIL2.38andMCA2.42)withindices between1.2and2.6.
QuantitativeandqualitativeassayofIAAproduction The IAA production assay was performed in 38 strains that were able to solubilize phosphate and fix nitro-gen. All of the strains tested produced IAA ranging from 16.4 to 601.7gmL−1. Pantoea (MCL2.66 and MBIL2.47),
Enterobacter(MCL2.65,MCR1.48and MCR1.23),Pectobacterium
(MCR2.29), Bacillus (MCR2.51 and MBI2.63), Pseudomonas
(MBR2.7, MCR1.10) and Stenotrophomonas (MBR2.29) genera showed thehighestyields(Table1).Thelowestproduction wasapproximately16gmL−1andwasproducedbystrains
MBR2.1andMBR2.22,correspondingtothegeneraBacillusand
Curtobacterium,respectively(Table1).
Plantgrowthpromotingreforestationbyendophytic bacteria
TwohighIAAproducingstrainswereselected.Onestrainhad thehighestphosphoroussolubilizationindex,strainMCR1.48 (Enterobactersp.),whilestrainMCR1.10(P.fluorescens)hadone ofthelowestphosphoroussolubilizationindices.Bothstains
Table1–Identificationandevaluationofinvitrotestsforplantgrowthpromotingbacteriaisolatedfrombranchesof mangroveplants.
Isolate Planthost Location Identification IAA(gmL−1)a Phosphate(P)
solubilizationindex (SI)a
Nitrogen fixation
MBA2.21 Aviceniasp. Industrial
contaminated (Bertioga)
Bacilluspumilus 31.2d 8.0c +
MBA2.18 Aviceniasp. Industrial
contaminated (Bertioga)
Bacilluspumilus 27.6d 4.2e +
MBA2.16 Aviceniasp. Industrial
contaminated (Bertioga)
Alcaligenessp. 33.7d 3.4e +
MBA2.4 Aviceniasp. Industrial
contaminated (Bertioga)
Bacilluspumilus 34.3d 4.8e +
MBA2.15 Aviceniasp. Industrial
contaminated (Bertioga)
Alcaligenesfaecalis 32.8d 3.5e +
MBR2.45 Rhizophoramangle Industrial contaminated (Bertioga)
Bacilluspumilus 24.4d 7.4d +
MBR2.40 Rhizophoramangle Industrial contaminated (Bertioga)
Bacilluspumilus 32.5d 7.0d +
MBR2.28 Rhizophoramangle Industrial contaminated (Bertioga)
Ochrobactrumsp. 100.3d 1.6f +
MBR2.16 Rhizophoramangle Industrial contaminated (Bertioga)
Bacilluspumilus 28.3d 6.8d +
MBR2.7 Rhizophoramangle Industrial contaminated (Bertioga)
Pseudomonassp. 406.8b 8.2c +
MBR2.1 Rhizophoramangle Industrial contaminated (Bertioga)
Bacilluspumilus 16.5d 5.9d +
MBR2.22 Rhizophoramangle Industrial contaminated (Bertioga)
Curtobacterium flaccumfaciens
16.4d 8.2c +
MBR2.29 Rhizophoramangle Industrial contaminated (Bertioga)
Stenotrophomonassp. 443.2b 6.5d +
MBIA2.42 Aviceniasp. OilSpill
contamination (Bertioga)
Bacillus amyloliquefaciens
55.4d 3.6e +
MBIA2.40 Aviceniasp. OilSpill
contamination (Bertioga)
Bacillus amyloliquefaciens
48.7d 3.8e +
MBIA2.34 Aviceniasp. OilSpill
contamination (Bertioga)
Pantoeaagglomerans 204.2c 10.2b +
MBIA2.35 Aviceniasp. OilSpill
contamination (Bertioga)
Bacilluspumilus 27.8d 8.5c +
MBIA2.43 Aviceniasp. OilSpill
contamination (Bertioga)
Bacillus amyloliquefaciens
55.6d 2.6f +
MBIL2.38 Lagunculariaracemosa OilSpill contamination (Bertioga)
Bacillussubtilis 56.8d 2.4f +
MBIL2.63 Lagunculariaracemosa OilSpill contamination (Bertioga)
Table1– (Continued)
Isolate Planthost Location Identification IAA(gmL−1)a Phosphate(P)
solubilizationindex (SI)a
Nitrogen fixation
MBIL2.47 Lagunculariaracemosa OilSpill contamination (Bertioga)
Pantoeadispersa 422.7b 11.2b +
MBIL2.64 Lagunculariaracemosa OilSpill contamination (Bertioga)
Pantoeaagglomerans 188.6c 8.4c +
MBIL2.51 Lagunculariaracemosa OilSpill contamination (Bertioga)
Bacilluspumilus 21.2d 6.0d +
MBIL2.46 Lagunculariaracemosa OilSpill contamination (Bertioga)
Pantoeasp. 220.4c 9.8b +
MBIR2.24 Rhizophoramangle OilSpill contamination (Bertioga)
Bacilluspumilus 27.6d 6.2d +
MBIR2.2 Rhizophoramangle OilSpill contamination (Bertioga)
Bacilluspumilus 34.8d 3.6e +
MCA2.42 Aviceniasp. Uncontaminated
(Cananéias)
Bacillussp. 38.5d 2.6f +
MCL2.66 Lagunculariaracemosa Uncontaminated (Cananéias)
Pantoeaagglomerans 513.9a 13.7a +
MCL2.65 Lagunculariaracemosa Uncontaminated (Cananéias)
Enterobacterludwigii 573.9a 11.2b +
MCL2.68 Lagunculariaracemosa Uncontaminated (Cananéias)
Sphingosinicellasp 75.4d 1.2f +
MCA2.20 Lagunculariaracemosa Uncontaminated (Cananéias)
Xanthomonas campestris
86.1d 1.2f +
MCR1.48 Rhizophoramangle Uncontaminated (Cananéias)
Enterobactersp. 540a 11.1b +
MCR1.23 Rhizophoramangle Uncontaminated (Cananéias)
Enterobactersp. 477.1b 9.0lc +
MCR1.10 Rhizophoramangle Uncontaminated (Cananéias)
Pseudomonas fluorescens
441.8b 6.5d +
MCR2.39 Rhizophoramangle Uncontaminated (Cananéias)
Bacilluspumilus 32.4d 4.4e +
MCR2.29 Rhizophoramangle Uncontaminated (Cananéias)
Peptobacteriumsp. 601.7a 8.2c +
MCR2.51 Rhizophoramangle Uncontaminated (Cananéias)
Bacillussafensis 402.5b 2.1f +
MCR2.33 Rhizophoramangle Uncontaminated (Cananéias)
Pantoeaagglomerans 124.8c 6.8d +
a Inacolumn,valueswiththesameletterdonotdifferata5%significancelevel(ScottKnotttest).
(withhighandlowphosphoroussolubilization)were inocu-latedinA.polyphylla plants.Theseedlingstesteddisplayed differentresultswhencomparedtothecontrol(Table2,Fig.1). ThetreatmentwithMCR1.10(thelowphosphorous solu-bilizationstrain)aswellastheconsortiumtreatment(V)was statisticallysimilartothecontrol(notinoculatedandnot fer-tilized),indicatingalackofabilitytopromoteplantgrowth.In contrast,seedlingsinoculatedwithMCR1.48(high phospho-roussolubilizationstrain)causedanincreaseindryrootand shootbiomass.Someofthetreatedseedlingshadanincrease inthenumberofroothairsintheiradventitiousrootsalong withrootpagethickening whencomparedwiththecontrol
(Table2,Fig.1).TheseedlingswithMCR1.48(highphosphorous
solubilizationstrain)inoculumandassociatedwith fertiliza-tionwerestatisticallysimilar.
Discussion
Theabilityofendophyticbacteria topromoteplantgrowth isattributedtodirectmechanismssuchasnitrogenfixation, planthormoneproduction(mainlyIAA),28phosphate
solubi-lization,andsiderophoreproduction29aswellastheincreased
absorptionofwaterandnutrientsandthesuppressionof dele-teriousmicroorganismsbymetaboliteproduction.30
Phosphatesolubilizationbymicroorganismshasan impor-tant functionin supplyingphosphorus (P) toplants31 with
thepotentialtobeusedasinoculants.Manyauthors32report
that the abilityof microorganisms to solubilize phosphate correlates withthe ability toproduce organic acids and/or extracellular polysaccharide.33–35 In this study, all of the
Table2–TheeffectofsoilinoculationofendophyticmangrovebacteriaonA.polyphyllaafter60daysfollowing inoculation.
Treatment Isolate Shootdrymass(g)a Rootdrymass(g)a
Treatment1(addingonly water) – 0.38±0.04b 0.61±0.17ab Treatment2(adding fertilizer) – 0.43±0.09ab 0.58±0.25b Treatment3(inoculating MCR1.10) Pseudomonasfluorescens (MCR1.10)–lowP solubilization 0.32±0.05b 0.49±0.16b Treatment4(inoculating MCR1.48) Enterobactersp.(MCR1.48)– highPsolubilization 0.50±0.06a 0.82±0.53a Treatment5(inoculating MCR1.10+MCR1.48)
MCR1.10andMCR1.48 0.43±0.07ab 0.65±0.20ab
Average – 0.41±0.13 0.62±0.25
a Inacolumn,valueswiththesameletterdonotdifferata5%significancelevel(Tukeytest).
Fig.1–Monjoleirorootsunderdifferenttreatments:(A)Treatment1(additionofonlywater);(B)Treatment2(additionof fertilizer);(C)Treatment3(inoculationofPseudomonasfluorescensMCR1.10);(D)Treatment4(inoculationofEnterobactersp. MCR1.48).
endophytestestedcould solubilizePin vitro,althoughtheir solubilizationindicesvaried.
IntheIAAproductionassay, strainsproducedsimilaror higheramounts ofIAAthan previousreportsindicated36,37
demonstratingtheirpotentialtoimproveplantgrowth.Some strainsofthesamespecieshaddifferentvalues,possiblydue tothedifferentamountsoftryptophaninthestrainswitheach celllinehavinganoptimalconcentrationforinterferingwith thesynthesisofIAA.38,39
Severalstudiesreportthatendophyticmicroorganismsare abletopromoteplantgrowthindifferentplants,17,40suchas
corn(ZeaMays), peppermint(Menthapiperita),41Vitis vinifera
L.42andpineapple(Ananascomosus).43However,therearefew
reports on the use of endophytic bacteria on growth pro-motion in woody plants. Previousstudies were performed mainlyontreesimportantinthepaperandcelluloseindustry, suchaspinesandeucalyptus.18BurnsandSchwarz44found
thatanunidentifiedbacteriuminduced90%ofrootexplant inPinuselliottiiwhencomparedtothecontrol.44 Other tree
speciesstudiedincludedpoplar(Populus),whichwasusedas amodelplant,andthebacteriumBurkholderiamultivorans,a nonpathogenicstrain,reportedtobeablecolonizetheroots
and significantlypromotethegrowth ofpoplarseedlings.45
Moreover,Bashan46reportedthatAzospirillumbrasilense and
Bacilluspumiluspromotedthegrowthoftwotreesusedin refor-estation(Prosopisarticulataand Parkinsoniamicrophylla),thus increasingplantdevelopmentandsurvival.
Two highIAAproducingstrains, P.fluorescensand Entero-bactersp.,wereselectedtoinoculateplantsandevaluatetheir growth infield conditions sinceboth the Pseudomonas and
Enterobactergenerahavebeenpreviouslyreportedtopromote the growthofplants.47–49 Themaindifferencebetweenthe
strainsselectedisthatEnterobactersp.(MCR1.48)hasahighP solubilizationindex,whileP.fluorescens(MCR1.10)hasoneof thelowestPsolubilizationindices.Weselectedthecommonly usedreforestationtreeA.polyphylla,whichhasfewpublished studiesinvolvinginoculationbythebacteriaofinterest.The presentwork demonstratesthattheinoculationofahighP solubilizationstrainMCR1.48(Enterobactersp.)increasedthe shootdrymassofmonjoleiro.Thisresultindicatesthat phos-phoroussolubilizationplaysakeyroleintreeplantgrowth. Therefore,thisstudyisthefirstknownreportofthegrowth promotionofA.polyphyllafrom theinoculationofan endo-phyticbacterium.
Inreforestation,therotationtimeislong,sothe inocula-tionofmicroorganismstoacceleratethetrees’development should help them grow more quickly over the long term. Wereportanincreaseintherateofseedlingsurvival,early establishmentinthefieldafterplantingalongwith improve-mentinqualityandcharacteristicsoftherootsystem,i.e.,all advantagesdesirableforbetterproduction.Therefore,we suc-cessfullyscreenedthebiotechnologicalpotentialofendophyte isolatesfrommangroves,focusingonplantgrowthpromotion. Weselectedastrainabletoprovidelimitednutrientsbyfixing nitrogensincenotallformsofnitrogeninthesoilareavailable totheplant;bysolubilizingphosphorus,whichispresentin soilbutisalsonotavailabletoplants;andbyproducingplant hormonesinvolvedinplantgrowthsuchasauxin(IAA).
Theuseofanendophyticmicroorganisminthesubstrate asinoculumfortheproductionofseedlingsofA.polyphyllais ahighlysuccessfulstrategythatcanbeutilizedinthe refor-estationnursery.TheinoculanteffectoftheEnterobactersp. endophyticbacteriainA.polyphyllaseedlingsaffectthe qual-ityofseedlingproduction,improving thedevelopmentand possiblyreducingthecostofchemicalfertilizationperformed bythenurserycompany.
Conflicts
of
interest
Theauthorsdeclarenoconflictsofinterest.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by a grant from FAPESP (Proc.2004/15414-6)toR.A.andbyafellowshipfromCNPqto M.N.D.(Proc150228/2017-1).WethankBiofloraforproviding thestructureandstafftodevelopnurseryexperiments.
r
e
f
e
r
e
n
c
e
s
1.AlongiDM.Presentstateandfutureoftheworld’smangrove
forest.EnvironConserv.2002;3:331–349.
2.ZhouHW,GuoCL,WongYS,TamNFY.Geneticdiversityof
dioxygenasegenesinpolycyclicaromatic
hydrocarbon-degradingbacteriaisolatedfrommangrove
sediments.FEMSMicrobiolLett.2006;262:148–157.
3.DiasAC,AndreoteFD,Dini-AndreoteF,etal.Diversityand
biotechnologicalpotentialofculturablebacteriafrom
Brazilianmangrovesediment.WorldJMicrobiolBiotechnol.
2009;25:1305–1311.
4.HolguinAG,Gonzalez-ZamoranoBP,BashanALE,Mendoza
AR,AmadorAE,BashanAY.Mangrovehealthinanarid
environmentencroachedbyurbandevelopment—acase
study.SciTotalEnviron.2006;363(1):260–274.
5.ThatoiH,BeheraBC,MishraRR,DuttaSK.Biodiversityand
biotechnologicalpotentialofmicroorganismsfrom
mangroveecosystems:areview.AnnMicrobiol.2013;63:1–19.
6.AndreoteFD,JiménezDJ,ChavesD,etal.Themicrobiomeof
Brazilianmangrovesedimentsasrevealedbymetagenomics.
PLoSONE.2012;7:6.
7.DiasAC,PereiraeSilvaMdeC,CottaSR,etal.Abundance
andgeneticdiversityofnifHgenesequencesin
anthropogenicallyaffectedBrazilianmangrovesediments.
ApplEnvironMicrobiol.2012;78(22):7960–7967.
8.Varon-LopezM,DiasAC,FasanellaCC,etal.
Sulphur-oxidizingandsulphate-reducingcommunitiesin
Brazilianmangrovesediments.ApplEnvironMicrobiol.
2014;16(3):845–855.
9.deSouzaSebastianesFL,Romão-DumaresqAS,LacavaPT,
etal.Speciesdiversityofculturableendophyticfungifrom
Brazilianmangroveforests.CurrGenet.2013;59(3):153–166.
10.CastroRA,QuecineMC,LacavaPT,etal.Isolationand
enzymebioprospectionofendophyticbacteriaassociated
withplantsofBrazilianmangroveecosystem.Springerplus.
2014;3:382.
11.PazICP,SantinRCM,GuimarãesAM,etal.Eucalyptusgrowth
promotionbyendophyticBacillusspp.GenetMolRes.
2012;11:3711–3720.
12.QuecineMC,AraujoWL,RossettoPB,etal.Asugarcane
growthpromotionbytheendophyticbacteriumPantoea
agglomerans33.1.ApplEnvironMicrobiol.2012;78:7511–7518.
13.HabibiS,DjedidiS,ProngjunthuekK,etal.Physiologicaland
geneticcharacterizationofricenitrogenfixerPGPRisolated
fromrhizospheresoilsofdifferentcrops.PlantSoil.
2014;379(1–2):51–66.
14.PardosM,ClimentJ,AlmeidaH,CalamaR.Theroleof
developmentalstageinfrosttoleranceofPinuspineaL.
seedlingsandsaplings.AnnForSci.2014;71:551–562.
15.DotySL.Enhancingphytoremediationthroughtheuseof
transgenicsandendophytes.NewPhytol.2008;79(2):318–333.
16.DouradoMN,FerreiraA,AraújoWL,AzevedoJL,LacavaPT.
Thediversityofendophyticmethylotrophicbacteriainan
oil-contaminatedandanoil-freemangroveecosystemand
theirtolerancetoheavymetals.BiotechnolResInt.2012:1–8.
17.HardoimPR,vanOverbeekLS,BergG,etal.Thehidden
worldwithinplants:ecologicalandevolutionary
considerationsfordefiningfunctioningofmicrobial
endophytes.MicrobiolMolBiol.2015;79:293–320.
18.ChanwayCP.Inoculationoftreerootswithplantgrowth
promotingsoilbacteria:anemergingtechnologyfor
reforestation.ForestSci.1997;43(14):99–112.
19.ChaerGM,ResendeAS,CampelloEFC,deFariaSM,Boddey
RM.Nitrogen-fixinglegumetreespeciesforthereclamation
ofseverelydegradedlandsinBrazil.TreePhysiol.
2011;31(2):139–149.
20.RaoKPC,VerchotLV,JoshiLM.Adaptationtoclimatechange
throughsustainablemanagementanddevelopmentof
agroforestrysystems.JSATAgricRes.2007;4(1):1–30.
21.LibaCM,FerraraFIS,ManfioGP,etal.Nitrogen-fixing
chemo-organotrophicbacteriaisolatedfrom
cyanobacteria-deprivedlichensandtheirabilitytosolubilize
phosphateandtoreleaseaminoacidsandphytohormones.J
ApplMicrobiol.2006;101:1076–1086.
22.VermaSC,LadhaJK,TripathiAK.Evaluationofplantgrowth
promotingandcolonizationabilityofendophytic
diazotrophsfromdeepwaterrice.JBiotechnol.
2001;91:127–141.
23.PattenCL,GlickBR.RoleofPseudomonasputidaindoleacetic
acidindevelopmentofthehostplantrootsystem.Appl
EnvironMicrobiol.2002;68:3795–3801.
24.BricJM,BostockRM,SilverstoneS.Rapidinsituassayfor
indolaceticacidproductionbybacteriaimmobilizedon
nitrocellulosemembrane.ApplEnvironMicrobiol.
1991;57:535–538.
25.HeuerH,KrsekM,BakerP,SmallaK,WellingtonEMH.
Analysisofactinomycetecommunitiesbyspecific
amplificationofgenesencoding16SrRNAand
gel-electrophoreticseparationindenaturinggradients.Appl
EnvironMicrobiol.1997;63:3233–3241.
26.LisJT.FractionationofDNAfragmentsbypolyethyleneglycol
inducedprecipitation.MethodsEnzymol.1980;65:347–353.
27.AltschulSF,GishW,MillerW,MyersEW.Basiclocal
28.AndradeLF,deSouzaGL,NietscheS,etal.Analysisofthe
abilitiesofendophyticbacteriaassociatedwithbanana
treerootstopromoteplantgrowth.JMicrobiol.2014;52:
27–34.
29.GlickBR.Theenhancementofplantgrowthbyfree-living
bacteria.CanJMicrobiol.1995;41(2):109–117.
30.BraderG,CompantS,MitterB,TrognitzF,SessitschA.
Metabolicpotentialofendophyticbacteria.CurrOpin
Biotechnol.2014;27:30–37.
31.RichardsonAE,BareaJM,McNeillAM,Prigent-CombaretC.
Acquisitionofphosphorusandnitrogenintherhizosphere
andplantgrowthpromotionbymicroorganisms.PlantSoil.
2009;321:305–309.
32.KimKY,JordanD,DonaldGAM.Effectof
phosphate-solubilizingbacteriaandvescular-arbuscular
mycorrhizaeontomatogrowthandsoilmicrobialactivity.
BiolFertSoils.1998;26:79–87.
33.SharmaSB,SayyedRZ,TrivediMH,GobiTA.Phosphate
solubilizingmicrobes:sustainableapproachformanaging
phosphorusdeficiencyinagriculturalsoils.SpringerPlus.
2013;2:587.
34.SouchieEL,Saggin-JúniorOJ,SilvaEMR,CampelloEFC,
AzcónR,BareaJM.CommunitiesofP-solubilizingbacteria,
fungiandarbuscularmycorrhizalfungiingrasspastureand
secondaryforestofParaty,RJ-Brazil.AnAcadBrasCienc.
2006;78:1–11.
35.WakelinSA,WarrenRA,HarveyPR,RyderMH.Phosphate
solubilizationbyPenicilliumspp.closelyassociatedwith
wheatroots.BiolFertSoils.2004;40:36–43.
36.AliB,SabriAN,LjungK,HasnainS.Quantificationof
indole-3-aceticacidfromplantassociatedBacillusspp.and
theirphytostimulatoryeffectonVignaradiata(L.).WorldJ
MicrobiolBiotechnol.2009;25:519–526.
37.RavariSB,HeidarzadehN.Isolationandcharacterizationof
rhizosphereauxinproducingBacilliandevaluationoftheir
potencyonwheatgrowthimprovement.ArchAgronSoilSci.
2014;60(7):895–905.
38.BarT,OkonY.Tryptophanconversiontoindole-3-aceticacid
viaindole-3-acetamideinAzospirillumbrasilenseSp7.CanJ
Microbiol.1993;39:81–86.
39.PastorN,RosasS,LunaV,RoveraM.Inoculationwith
PseudomonasputidaPCI2,aphosphatesolubilizing
rhizobacterium,stimulatesthegrowthoftomatoplants.
Symbiosis.2014;62(3):157–167.
40.SantoyoG,Moreno-HagelsiebG,Orozco-MosquedaMC,Glick
BR.Plantgrowth-promotingbacterialendophytes.Microbiol
Res.2016;183:92–99.
41.MucciarelliM,ScanneriniS,BerteaC,MaffeiM.Invitroand
invivopeppermint(Menthapiperita)growthpromotionby
nonmycorrhizalfungalcolonization.NewPhytol.
2003;158:579–591.
42.CompantS,ReiterB,SessitschA,NowakJ,ClémentC,Barka
EA.EndophyticcolonizationofVitisviniferaL.byplant
growth-promotingbacteriumBurkholderiasp.strainPsJN.
ApplEnvironMicrobiol.2005;71:1685–1693.
43.BaldottoMAB,CanellasLP,Bressan-SmithR,OlivaresFL.
Growthpromotionofpineapple‘vitória’byhumicacidsand
Burkholderiaspp.duringacclimatization.RevBrasCiêncdo Solo.2010;5:1593–1600.
44.BurnsJA,SchwarzOJ.Bacterialstimulationofadventitious
rootingoninvitroculturedslachpine(PinuselliottiiEngelm.)
seedlingexplants.PlantCellRep.1996;15(6):405–408.
45.LiGX,WuXQ,YeJR.Biosafetyandcolonizationof
BurkholderiamultivoransWS-FJ9anditsgrowth-promoting
effectsonpoplars.ApplMicrobiolBiotechnol.
2013;97(24):10489–10498.
46.BashanBashanY,SalazarB,PuenteME,BacilioM,Linderman
R.Enhancedestablishmentandgrowthofgiantcardon
cactusinanerodedfieldintheSonoranDesertusingnative
legumetreesasnurseplantsaidedbyplant
growth-promotingmicroorganismsandcompost.BiolFert
Soils.2009;6:585–594.
47.DuanJ,JiangW,ChengZ,HeikkilaJJ,GlickBR.Thecomplete
genomesequenceoftheplantgrowth-promotingbacterium
Pseudomonassp.UW4.PLoSONE.2013;8(3):e58640.
48.RajkumarM,FreitasH.Influenceofmetalresistant-plant
growth-promotingbacteriaonthegrowthofRicinus
communisinsoilcontaminatedwithheavymetals.
Chemosphere.2008;71(5):834–842.
49.WangYL,YangX,ZhangX,etal.Improvedplantgrowthand
Znaccumulationingrainsofrice(OryzasativaL.)by
inoculationofendophyticmicrobesisolatedfromaZn
Hyperaccumulator,SedumalfrediiH.JAgricFoodChem.