• Nenhum resultado encontrado

Rev. bras. ortop. vol.48 número5

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2018

Share "Rev. bras. ortop. vol.48 número5"

Copied!
3
0
0

Texto

(1)

r e v b r a s o r t o p . 2013;48(5):438–440

w w w . r b o . o r g . b r

Original

Article

Injury

of

the

knee

ligaments

associated

with

ipsilateral

femoral

shaft

fractures

Marco

Tulio

Lopes

Caldas

a,∗

,

Dorotea

Starling

Malheiros

b

,

Angelo

Paulo

Lazzaroni

c

,

Eduardo

Axer

Avelino

d

,

Anderson

José

Santos

d

aOrthopedistandTraumatologist;HeadoftheMedicalResidenceService,HospitalMariaAméliaLins,Fundac¸ãoHospitalardoEstadode

MinasGerais(FHEMIG);MemberoftheKneeGroupofHospitalMariaAméliaLins,FHEMIG,BeloHorizonte,MG,Brazil

bOrthopedistandTraumatologist;SpecialistinPediatricOrthopedicsatHospitalMariaAméliaLins,FHEMIG,BeloHorizonte,MG,Brazil

cOrthopedistandTraumatologist;MemberoftheKneeGroupofHospitalMariaAméliaLins,FHEMIG,BeloHorizonte,MG,Brazil

dResidentPhysicianinOrthopedicsandTraumatology,HospitalMariaAméliaLins,FHEMIG,BeloHorizonte,MG,Brazil

a

r

t

i

c

l

e

i

n

f

o

Articlehistory:

Received19October2012 Accepted6November2012

Keywords: Fractures Femur Ligaments Knee

a

b

s

t

r

a

c

t

Objective:Withtheobjectiveofidentifyingtheincidenceofipsilateralkneeligamentinjury, thirty-sixpatientswithfemoralshaftfractureswereevaluated.

Methods:Duringtheosteosynthesisproceduretorepairthefemurwhileunderanesthesia, allpatientsunderwentaphysicalexaminationandX-rayexamination.

Results:Themostcommonmechanismofinjuryobservedwasmotorcycleaccidents.Ofthe thirty-sixpatientsthatwerestudied,elevenpatients(30.5%)hadakneeligamentinjury.Of theelevenpatients,64%hadacruciateligamentinjury.Theligamentinjurywasnottreated atthetimeoftheosteosynthesisprocedure.

Conclusion:Wehighlightthedifficultyofdiagnosisatthetimeofadmissionandtheneedfor systematicphysicalexaminationbeforeandaftersurgicaltreatmentoffemoralfracture.

©2013SociedadeBrasileiradeOrtopediaeTraumatologia.PublishedbyElsevierEditora Ltda.Allrightsreserved.

Lesão

ligamentar

do

joelho

associada

à

fratura

diafisária

do

fêmur

ipsilateral

Palavras-chave: Fratura Fêmur Ligamentos Joelho

r

e

s

u

m

o

Objetivo:Determinaraincidênciadelesãoligamentardojoelhoempacientescomfratura diafisáriadefêmuripsilateral.

Métodos:Foramavaliados36pacientes.Todosforamsubmetidosaexamefísicoeradiológico sobanestesianomomentodaosteossíntesedofêmur.

Resultados:Omecanismodetraumamaiscomumfoioacidentecommotociclistas. Apresen-taramlesãoligamentardojoelho11(30,5%)pacienteseforamencontradaslesõescentrais (64%)eperiféricas(36%).Nenhumadaslesõesfoitratadanomomentodafixac¸ãodafratura.

StudyconductedattheHospitalMariaAméliaLins,Fundac¸ãoHospitalardoEstadodeMinasGerais,BeloHorizonte,MG,Brazil.

Correspondingauthorat:RuadosOtoni,772,SantaEfigênia,BeloHorizonte,MG,CEP:30150-270,Brazil.

E-mail:[email protected](M.T.L.Caldas).

2255-4971/$–seefrontmatter©2013SociedadeBrasileiradeOrtopediaeTraumatologia.PublishedbyElsevierEditoraLtda.Allrightsreserved.

(2)

rev bras ortop.2013;48(5):438–440

439

Conclusão: Ressalta-seadificuldadedodiagnósticonoatodaadmissãoeanecessidadede examefísicosistematizadoanteseapósotratamentocirúrgicodafraturafemoral.

©2013SociedadeBrasileiradeOrtopediaeTraumatologia.PublicadoporElsevier EditoraLtda.Todososdireitosreservados.

Introduction

Femoralfracturesaresevereinjuriesthatquicklydraw physi-cians’attentionandareoftenassociatedwithotherfractures. Ipsilateralkneeligamentinjuriesmayalsobeassociatedwith suchfactures,andmostofthesearediagnosedatalatestage. WalkerandKennedy1 reportedthattheseligament injuries weresilentoroccultandthatupto78%ofthemprogressed undiagnosedatthis stage, withnegativeconsequences for patientsandorthopedists.

In the literature, there are references to an association betweenthese injuriesand increased occurrencesof high-energyaccidents.2,3 Trickey4 reportedthat traffic accidents werethe mostfrequenttypeoftraumaforthisassociation ofinjuries.

Incidencesof32%5to48%6havebeenreportedforligament injuriesamongindividualswithipsilateralfemoralfractures. VanRaayetal.6reportedthattimethatelapsedbetweenthe initialtraumaandthediagnosiswasupto12.8months.

Todiagnoseligamentinjurieswithinthisassociation, sev-eralmethodshavealreadybeenreported.Esmaeilijahetal.3 used physical examination under anesthesia, De Campos etal.2usedarthroscopy,WalkerandKennedy1useddistal fix-ationofthefemurinassociationwithkneeradiographsunder stress, and Dickson et al.7 performed magnetic resonance imagingontheirpatients.Inreferralcarecentersfor orthope-dictrauma,establishmentofaprotocolforidentifyingthese casesisfundamental,withaviewtodeterminingthecorrect treatmentwithintheproperwindowofopportunity.4,7–9For multipletraumapatientswhopresentfemoralshaftfractures, kneeligamentinjuriesareadiagnosticchallengebecauseof thedifficultycreatedinthephysicalexamination,although suchexaminationisfundamentalfordefiningthetreatment andprognosis.4,6–8,10

Materials

and

methods

BetweenMarch1,2011andMarch1,2012,the kneesofall patients with ipsilateral femoral shaft fractures who were attendedatourserviceandwho underwentosteosynthesis usinganymethodwereevaluatedwiththeaimofassessing theprevalenceofligamentinjuries.

Theroutineexaminationwasperformedduringthesame induction of anesthesia as for the osteosynthesis on the femoralfracture.Thisdidnotgenerateanyrisks,discomfort oradditionalcostsforthepatientorfortheinstitution.Inall cases,thesemiologicalexaminationwasconductedbymore thanoneprofessionalandwasalwaysconfirmedbya profes-sionalwithexperienceofkneesurgery.

Thedataweregatheredintoadatabaseandwereevaluated lateronusingtheEpi-Infosoftware.

It is known that in evaluating acute knee injuries, the goldstandardisphysicalexamination,sometimesdoneunder anesthesia,inassociationwithmagneticresonanceanalysis.7 Inourinstitution,magneticresonanceimagingisdifficultto obtain,whichhasmadephysicalexaminationunder anesthe-siaandradiographsunderstressfundamentallyimportantfor thediagnosis.

Patientswithfemoralshaftfracturesbutwithoutany his-toryofotheracuteorchronicinjuriestotheipsilaterallower limbwereincluded.Patientswithpreviousinjuriestotheknee investigatedandthosewithotherfracturesintheipsilateral lowerlimbwereexcluded.

Thepatientssignedafreeandinformedconsentstatement atthetimeoftheirownhospitaladmissionoratasubsequent outpatientconsultation.Theresearchprojectwasapprovedby theResearchEthicsCommittee.

Results

Our sample comprised 36 femoral shaft fractures, among whichtherewere 11cases(30.5%)withipsilateral knee lig-amentinjury(sixleft-sideandfiveright-side).

The trauma mechanism was a traffic accident in most cases. Of these, three involved cars and six, motorcyclists (Fig.1).

Thepatients’agesrangedfrom16to45years,withamean of27.5years,andonlyonepatientwasfemale.

The fractures were identified in accordance with the ArbeitsgemeinschaftfürOsteosynthesefragen(AO) classifica-tion.SixweretypeA,fourweretypeBandonewastypeC.

The distribution according to injury type is shown in

Table1.Therewerethreecasesofinjurytobothcruciate

lig-aments(oneassociatedwiththelateralandmedialperiphery and two associatedonly withthe medialperiphery), three cases ofposterior cruciate ligament injury (twoassociated withthelateralperipheryand onewiththemedial periph-ery),onecaseofanteriorcruciateligament(associatedwith

Trampling 1

1

6 3

Motorcyclistc

Automobilistic

Bicycle

(3)

440

rev bras ortop.2013;48(5):438–440

Table1–Frequenciesofligamentinjurytypesobserved in36casesofipsilateralfemoralfractures.

Ligamentinjurytype Numberofcases Percentage

ACL+PCLinjurya 3 27%

PCLinjurya 3 27%

ACLinjurya 1 9%

Peripheralinjuryalone 4 36%

a Associatedwiththeperiphery.

Table2–Frequenciesofcentralligamentinjurieswithor withoutassociations.

Injurytype Associations Numberofcases

ACLinjury Withoutperiphery 0

Withperiphery 1

PCLinjury Withoutperiphery 0

Withperiphery 3

ACL+PCLinjury Withoutperiphery 0

Withperiphery 3

themedialperiphery)andfourcasesofperipheralinjuryalone (twomedialandtwolateral).

Theligamentinjuriesidentifiedhadnotbeendiagnosedor reportedinthemedicalfilespreviously.

Noneoftheligamentinjuriesweretreatedatthetimeof fracturefixation.

Discussion

Regardingtheincidenceofkneeligamentinjuriesassociated withipsilateral femoralshaft fractures,some studies have shownresultssimilartoours.Szalayetal.9foundthatamong 114patientswithkneefractures,27%presentedknee insta-bility.Facciniet al.11 reevaluated97knees ofpatients with femoralfracturesanddiagnosedthat26.7%hadkneeligament injuries.Bragaetal.5foundthat31%outof29caseshadknee ligamentinjuries.

Otherstudieshaveshownlowerincidence.Mooreetal.10 observedthatonly5.3%outof320fracturesreviewedshowed kneeligamentinjuries.DickobandMommsen12reviewed59 femoralshaftfracturesandfoundthat18.6%hadknee liga-mentinjuries.

High-energy trauma capable of fracturing the femur increasestheincidenceofotherassociatedinjuriesandthe kneeisoneoftheregionsmostfrequentlyaffected.

Weemphasizethatthegreaterincidenceofposterior cruci-ateligamentinjuries,inrelationtoanteriorcruciateligament injuries,wasprobablyduetoinvolvementoftraumaofthe anteriorregionofthekneeandalsotoassociationswith cen-tralligamentinjury,whichinallcaseswasassociatedwitha peripheralinjury(Table2).

With almost one-third of the patients affected by this association, greater frequency of early diagnosis would be expected. However, what happens is that because of difficultyinperformingligamentexaminationduringthe pre-osteosynthesisstage,manycasesareonlydiagnosedlateron

and,insomecases,theopportunityofundertakingasurgical approachduringtheacutephaseislost.

Conclusion

Associationsbetweenkneeligamentinjuriesand ipsilateral femoralfracturesoccurfrequentlyandaffectalmostone-third ofthecasesrecorded.Attentiondirectedtowardfemoral frac-turesandthedifficulty inperformingphysicalexamination beforethefracturehasbeenstabilizedmayexplainthehigh proportionofcasesthatarediagnosedatalatestage.Physical examinationperformedjustafterfracturefixation,withthe patientanesthetizedandwiththeaidofstressradiographs, mayhelptoexplainthemajorityofthediagnosesandenable earlytreatment,whichwouldbemoreappropriate.

Conflicts

of

interest

Theauthorsdeclarethattherewerenoconflictsofinterest.

r

e

f

e

r

e

n

c

e

s

1.WalkerDM,KennedyJC.Occultkneeligamentinjuries

associatedwithfemoralshaftfractures.AmJSportsMed.

1980;8:172–4.

2.DeCamposJ,VangsnessJrCT,MerrittPO,SherJ.Ipsilateral

kneeinjurywithfemoralfracture.Examinationunder

anesthesiaandarthroscopicevaluation.ClinOrthopRelat

Res.1994:178–82.

3.EsmaeilijahAA,HeidaryH,ShakibaM.Associationofknee

ligamentinjurywithipsilateralfemoralshaftfractures.IrJ

OrthopSurg.2004;2:37–9.

4.TrickeyEL.Ruptureoftheposteriorcruciateligamentofthe

knee.JBoneJointSurgBr.1968;50:334–41.

5.BragaGF,CunhaFM,LazaroniAP.Instabilidadedojoelho

associadaàfraturadofêmur.RevBrasOrtop.1999;34:329–32.

6.VanRaayJJ,RaaymakersEL,DupreeHW.Kneeligament

injuriescombinedwithipsilateraltibialandfemoral

diaphysealfractures:thefloatingknee.ArchOrthopTrauma

Surg.1991;110:75–7.

7.DicksonKF,GallandMW,BarrackRL,NeitzschmanHR,Harris

MB,MyersL,etal.Magneticresonanceimagingoftheknee

afteripsilateralfemurfracture.JOrthopTrauma.

2002;16:567–71.

8.AuffarthA,BognerR,KollerH,TauberM,MayerM,ReschH,

etal.Howsevereareinitiallyundetectedinjuriestotheknee

accompanyingafemoralshaftfracture?JTrauma.

2009;66:1398–401.

9.SzalayMJ,HoskingOR,AnnearP.Injuryofkneeligament

associatedwithipsilateralfemoralshaftfracturesandwith

ipsilateralfemoralandtibialshaftfractures.Injury.

1990;21:398–400.

10.MooreTM,PatzakisMJ,HarveyJrJP.Ipsilateraldiaphyseal

femurfracturesandkneeligamentinjuries.ClinOrthopRelat

Res.1988:182–9.

11.FacciniR,SartoriE,BiscioneR,LupiL.Associationbetween

fractureofthediaphysisofthefemurandlesionofthe

ligamentsoftheknee.ChirOrganiMov.1993;78:177–82.

12.DickobM,MommsenU.Damagetothekneeligamentasa

concomitantinjuryinfemoralshaftfractures.

Imagem

Fig. 1 – Representation of the incidence of trauma mechanisms.
Table 2 – Frequencies of central ligament injuries with or without associations.

Referências

Documentos relacionados

In the last few years, the number of human and canine cases of AVL in the Metropolitan Region of Belo Horizonte (MRBH) in the State of Minas Gerais (MG), Brazil, has

AMS - Vascular surgeon, Hospital João XXIII, Fundação Hospitalar do Estado de Minas Gerais (FHEMIG); Residency in Endovascular Surgery and Vascular Surgery, Hospital das Clínicas

* Study carried out at the Federal University of Minas Gerais School of Medicine and Hospital das Clínicas, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.. Adjunct Professor

* Study carried out at the Federal University of Minas Gerais School of Medicine and Hospital das Clínicas, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.. Adjunct Professor

Cardiovascular Surgeon; Specialist Member of the Brazilian Society of Cardiovascular Surgery (Cardiovascular Surgeon in the Hospital Evangélico of Belo Horizonte and

2 Médico Neurologista, Serviço de Neurologia do Hospital das Clínicas da Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte MG, Brazil; 3 Médico Neurologista, University of

Hospital de Ensino Instituto Raul Soares, Fundação Hospitalar do Estado de Minas Gerais (FHEMIG), Belo Horizonte (MG), Brasil Departamento de Morfologia, Instituto de

2 – Member of the Knee Surgery Service, São José University Hospital, Minas Gerais School of Medical Sciences, Belo Horizonte (HUSJ-FCMMG-BH) and Adjunct Professor of Orthopedics