ContentslistsavailableatScienceDirect
Sensors
and
Actuators
B:
Chemical
j ourn a l h o m e pa g e :w w w . e l s e v i e r . c o m / l o c a t e / s n b
Environmentally
compatible
bioconjugated
gold
nanoparticles
as
efficient
contrast
agents
for
colorectal
cancer
cell
imaging
Kássio
M.G.
Lima
a,
Raimundo
F.
Araújo
Junior
b,
Aurigena
A.
Araujo
c,
Ana
Luiza
C.S.
Leitão
Oliveira
d,
Luiz
H.S.
Gasparotto
a,∗aGroupofBiologicalChemistryandChemometrics,InstituteofChemistry,FederalUniversityofRioGrandedoNorte,Natal59072-970,RN,Brazil
bDepartmentofMorphology,PostgraduationprogrammeinHealthScience/PostgraduationprogrammeinStructuralandFunctionalBiology,Federal
UniversityofRioGrandedoNorte,Natal59072-970,RN,Brazil
cDepartmentofBiophysicsandPharmacology,PostgraduationprogrammeinPublicHealth/PostgraduationprogrammeinPharmaceuticalScience,
FederalUniversityofRioGrandedoNorte,Natal59072-970,RN,Brazil
dPostgraduationprogrammeinPharmaceuticalScience,FederalUniversityofRioGrandedoNorte,Natal59072-970,RN,Brazil
a
r
t
i
c
l
e
i
n
f
o
Articlehistory:
Received3November2013
Receivedinrevisedform
27December2013
Accepted3February2014
Availableonline12February2014
Keywords: Greensynthesis Goldnanoparticles Colorectalcancer Bioconjugation Confocalmicroscopy Cellimaging
a
b
s
t
r
a
c
t
Inthisstudyweshow,forthefirsttime,thatgoldnanoparticles(AuNPs)synthesizedbyasimple, inexpen-sive,andenvironmentally-correctmethodcanbeeasilyconjugatedwiththeantibodiesanti--catenin andanti-E-cadherintospecificallytargetcolorectalcarcinomacells.Theantibody/AuNPsconjugateswere thensuccessfullyappliedforimagingcancerouscellswithfluorescenceconfocalmicroscopy.TheAuNPs aswellastheconjugateswereverystableinhigh-salinitymedium,apre-requisiteforapplicationin physiological-likeenvironments.Fluorescenceresultssuggestthatconjugationwasachievedbydirect adsorptionofantibodiesontheAuNPssurface.Finally,comparedwithastandardmethodofcellstaining, ourmethodislesslaboriousandthepreparationtime(fromimmobilizationofcellsontoglasscoverslips untilobservationbyconfocalmicroscopy)decreasedfrom27htoabout1h,whichmakesthemethod eligibleforcolorectalcancerdiagnostic.
©2014ElsevierB.V.Allrightsreserved.
1. Introduction
Currentcancerdiagnosticmethodologiesincludeoptical imag-ingtechniquessuchascoherencetomography andfluorescence confocalmicroscopy.Theimageisgeneratedbythebackscattered lightfromtheendogenouschromophorespresentinthetissue.The weakopticalsignalresultsinpoorintracellularcontrastandsubtle spectraldifferencesbetweenmalignantandbenigncellshamper a proper diagnostic [1]. In order to overcome these problems, exogenouschemicals(mainlyorganicdyes)thatfunctionas opti-calcontrastagenthavebeenusedtoenhancethevisibilityofboth precancerousandcancerouscells.However,organicdyesare sub-jectedtorapidphotobleaching[2],thereforebecominginefficient astheanalysisproceeds.Otherdisadvantagesofconventionaldyes includepoorhydrophilicity,lowquantumyield,andlowdetection sensitivityinbiologicalenvironment[2].
∗ Correspondingauthor.Tel.:+558433422323;fax:+558432119224.
E-mailaddress:lhgasparotto@ufrnet.br(L.H.S.Gasparotto).
Recentadvancesofnanotechnologyhaveallowedthe develop-mentofnewfunctionalnanomaterialswithenhancedspecificity for molecular imaging. In particular, colloidal Au nanoparti-cles(AuNPs) are extremely advantageousas contrast agents in biomedicine[1,3–6]astheycanbeeasilycombinedwitha recog-nitionagent.First,AuNPspresentasize-tunablesurfaceplasmon resonance(SPR)thatleadstostrongabsorptionandscatteringin thevisible-to-near-infraredregion,acharacteristicwhichmakes themconsiderablysuperiortotheconventional dyesappliedin biomedicalimaging.Forinstance,theplasmonresonance absorp-tionofsphericalgoldnanoparticleshasanabsorptioncoefficient ordersofmagnitudelargerthanthoseofregulardyes.Asan exam-pletheabsorptioncoefficient(ε)for40-nmgoldnanoparticles[7]at awavelengthof530nmwascalculatedtobe∼7.7×109M−1cm−1,
whiletheεofrhodoamine6Gis1.16×105M−1cm−1[8].Second,
AuNPsdonotsufferphotobleachingandseemtobebiocompatible
[9].Third,thechemistryofgoldisquiterich.TheAuNPssurface binds strongly with amines, thiols and disulfides, allowingthe surfacebioconjugationwithagreatvarietyofpeptides,DNAand proteins,enablingselectivetargetingofcancercells.Furthermore, in oppositiontodyes and organicmolecules,severalfunctional
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2014.02.008
groupscanbeattachedontothesamenanoparticle,makingthem alsoeligiblefordrugdelivery[10].
In this paper we synthesized AuNPs bioconjugated with -cateninantibody(anti--catenin)andE-cadherinantibory (anti-E-cadherin) and applied them as novelcontrast agents for the detectionofcolorectalcancerouscellswithfluorescenceconfocal microscopy.E-cadherinislocalizedonthesurfaceofepithelialcells inregionsofcell–cellcontactknownasadherensjunctionsandis implicatedincell–celladhesioninepithelialtissues[11–13]. -Catenininteractswithcadherinsthroughitscytoplasmicdomain. ␣-cateninconnectstheE-cadherinand-catenincomplextoactin filaments.The dissociation ofE-cadherin-catenin complexfrom cellmembrane is important inmalignant progression. In many epithelialcancers,membranousE-cadherinislostand-catenin dissociatesinthecytoplasmandaccumulatesinthenucleusasa transcriptionfactor,concomitantlywithtumorprogression[12]. Down-regulationofmembranousE-cadherinand-catenin,and cytoplasmic/nuclearaccumulationof-cateninhavebeen previ-ouslyreportedinseveralcancersandholdpromiseasprognostic markers[14].In humans-cateninandE-cadherin areencoded bytheadenomatouspolyposiscoli(APC)andCDH1genes, respec-tively,andtheirmutationmayresultincolorectalcancerleadingto anoverexpressionof-cateninandE-cadherinbythecell[11–16]. Thestrategy wastherefore tocombinethespecificitiesof anti--cateninandanti-E-cadherinwiththefluorescentpropertiesof theAuNPstoproduceaselectivecontrastagentfortargeting can-cer.Inthissystem,theAuNPsfunctionasthesignalingpartand theanti--cateninandanti-E-cadherinactasrecognitionunitsfor specificbindingwiththeoverexpressed-cateninandE-cadherin inthecell.Theconfocalmicroscopyrevealedthatthe antibody-conjugatedAuNPswereveryefficientinmarkingcancerouscells. Ontheotherhand,nospecificinteractionbetweennormalcells andconjugatedAuNPswasobserved.Anotherinterestingfeature ofthepresentworkistheuseofanenvironmentallyfriendlyroute to produce theAuNPs based on thereduction of gold ions by glycerolinalkalinemedium.Glycerol’snon-toxicityand biodegrad-abilitymakeitanexcellentalternativetocommonlyusedreducing
agents.Theconjugationswithanti--cateninandanti-E-cadherin areachievedby simpleincubation afterreducingthepHof the nanoparticlecolloidalsolutiontoaround7.Incomparisonto cur-rentmethodsforproductionandconjugationofAuNPs,ourmethod isquitesimple,low-costandenvironmentallycompatible,witha potentialtoberoutinelyappliedincancerdiagnostics.
2. Experimental
2.1. Chemicalsandreagents
Gold trichloride (30wt% in HCl), polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP, MW=10.000),sodiumhydroxide,dialysistubingcellulose
mem-brane, and glycerol were products of Sigma-Aldrich Chemical Co. Sulphuric acid and hydrogen peroxide were purchased fromVetec.Phosphate-bufferedsaline(PBS)solutionandbovine serum albumine (BSA, 5%) were purchased from Life Tech-nologies Corporation©. -Catenin antibodies (anti--catenin)
andE-cadherinantibodies(anti-E-cadherin)wereacquiredfrom ABCAM® attheconcentration of200gL−1 in PBSbuffer.
Dul-becco’s modified Eagle’smedium (DMEM) and heat-inactivated bovineserumwerepurchasedfromLifeTechnologiesCorporation©
andCultilabLtda/Brasil,respectively. 2.2. ProductionandcharacterizationofAuNPs
AuNPswereproducedusingapreviouslyreportedmethod[17]. Briefly,allglasswarewaskeptovernightinKMnO4+NaOHsolution,
rinsedwithdeionizedwater,keptfor10mininH2O2+H2SO4
solu-tion(1:1v/v),againrinsedwithdeionizedwateranddriedpriorto use.KnownamountsofPVP(MW=10.000)andgoldchloridewere
dissolvedin10mLofwater.Inaseparatebeaker,determined quan-titiesofglycerolandNaOHweredissolvedin10mLofwater.The glycerol–NaOHsolutionwasthenaddedtotheAuCl3-PVPsolution
toyieldthefollowing finalconcentrations:1.0mMAu3+,0.10M
NaOH, 0.10Mglycerol and 10gL−1 PVP. The final mixture had adeep-redcolorduetotheformedAuNPs.TheAuNPs colloidal
Fig.2.NormalizedUV–visspectraofAuNPsindifferentconditionsdistinguished
withdifferently-coloredcurvesshowninthelegends.(Forinterpretationofthe
ref-erencestocolorinthisfigurelegend,thereaderisreferredtothewebversionof
thisarticle.)
solutionwasallowedtorestfor1weektoguaranteereaction com-pletion.Consideringaquantitativetransformationofgoldionsinto nanoparticles,theconcentrationof AuNPs wasestimated tobe 197gmL−1.Thewholeprocedureforestimatingthe nanoparti-cleconcentrationcanbefoundin[18].TheAuNPscolloidalsolution hadthenitspHadjustedto7byadditionofdilutedHCl.Afterwards, theAuNPscolloidalsolutionwassubjectedtodialysisfor purifica-tionandtoremoveextrafreesmallmolecules.Thedialysisprocess isasfollows:theoutsideandinsideofthedialysisbagwerewashed withdeionizedwaterandthenplacedintoabeakerwithpurewater toboilfor5min.Thebagwasthenwashedwithwater,filledwith theAuNPscolloidalsolutionandallowedtoboilinalargebeaker for6h.Duringtheboilingwaterwaschangedthreetimes.
UV–vis absorptionspectraoftheAuNPs wereacquired with anEvolution60SUV–visiblespectrophotometer(Thermo Scien-tific)spectrophotometer.Fluorescencespectroscopywascarried outwithaPerkinElmerLS45fluorometer.Transmissionelectron microscopy(TEM)imageswereacquiredwithaJEOL2100F micro-scopeoperatingat200kV.
2.3. ConjugationofantibodieswithAuNPs
ConjugationofAuNPswithanti--cateninandanti-E-cadherin wasachievedbysimpleincubation.Bothantibodieswereacquired attheconcentrationof200gmL−1 inPBSbuffer. PBSandBSA wereusedasmediumtoyieldthefollowingsolutionsofconjugates: (1)3Lantibody+1000LPBS/BSA+500LAuNPs;(2)3L anti-body+750LPBS/BSA+750LAuNPs;(3)3Lantibody+500L PBS/BSA+1000LAuNPs.Theconjugatesolutionswereallowed torestfor1hpriorincubationwithcells.Theconjugates(1),(2), and(3) hadantibody/AuNPsratiosof6.1×10−3,4.1×10−3 and 3.0×10−3,respectively.
2.4. Cellculture
Non-cancerous cells (HKE)andcancercells HT29(colorectal adenocarcinoma)wereusedasamodelforcellimaging.Bothtypes ofcells werepurchased fromtheCulture Collectionof the Bio-scienceCentre,FederalUniversityofRioGrandedo Norte.HT29 cellsareknowntooverexpressE-cadherinandcatenin.Thecells weremaintainedinDulbecco’smodifiedEagle’smedium supple-mentedwith10%v/vheat-inactivatefetalbovineserum.Cultured cells were then plated onto glass coverslips in 24 well plates (5×104 cells/well) and allowed to grow for 24h. Afterwards,
the cells were washed, fixed with paraformaldehyde, perme-abilizedwithTriton-X and incubatedwith100Lof eitherthe cadherin–AuNPsconjugate or catenin–AuNPsconjugate for one hourinahumidatmosphereatroomtemperature.Control exper-imentswereperformedunderthesameconditionsbutwithout additionoftheconjugates.Instead,cellswereincubatedwithAlexa Fluor®488goatanti-rabbitsecondaryantibody(Abcam)for2h.
Theglasscoverslipswerethendirectlyobservedwiththeconfocal microscope.
2.5. Confocalmicroscopy
HealthyandcancerouscellswereexaminedunderaLSM510 confocal laser scanning microscope (Carl Zeiss, Jena, Germany) equipped witha condenser using laser excitation from 442to 520nm.Inthistechniquethespecimenispointed-illuminatedand thelightproducedbyfluorescenceveryclosetothefocalplaneis detected.Incontrolexperiments,cellimageswereacquiredinthe
Fig.3.FluorescenceemissionspectraofAuNPsexcitedat330nminthepresenceof(a)-cateninand(b)E-cadherin.Excitationandemissionslitswere10nm.The
concentrationsofbothantibodiesare:2.0gmL−1(redcurve),3.0gmL−1(greencurve)and5.0gmL−1(bluecurve).TheconcentrationofAuNPswasheldconstantat
Fig.4.Confocalimagesofhealthycellsacquiredatanexcitationlaserof520nm.Leftcolumn:imagesacquiredwiththeconjugateof-catenin.Theconjugateshad
-catenin/AuNPsratiosof(A1)6.1×10−3,(A2)4.1×10−3and(A3)3.0×10−3.Rightcolumn:imagesacquiredwiththeconjugateofE-cadherin.Theconjugateshad
E-cadherin/AuNPsratiosof(B1)6.1×10−3,(B2)4.1×10−3and(B3)3.0×10−3.Magnification:10×.Scalebar=100m.
sameconditionsusingAlexaFluor®488goatanti-rabbitsecondary
antibodyinsteadtheantibody–AuNPsconjugates.
3. Resultsanddiscussion
TheAuNPsusedinthisworkweresynthesizedbyreducingAu3+
withglycerolinalkalinemedium.Glycerolisaninexpensive chem-icalandreadilybiodegradableunderaerobicconditions,thereforea greeneroptionwhencomparedtocurrentreducingchemicalssuch asformamide,sodiumborohydrideandhydrazine.Sodiumcitrate
[19]isefficientingeneratinggoldnanoparticles,howevertheyare
formedonlyuponheatingthesolution(80–100◦C).Fig.1AandB showsaUV–visspectrumandahigh-resolutionTEMimageof as-preparedAuNPsproducedbysimpleadditionofNaOH-glycerolto AuCl3-PVPatroomtemperature.ThecolloidalAuNPsspectrumhad
amaximumabsorbance(Max)at520nm,avaluetypicalfor
spher-icalgoldnanoparticles[20–22].Thesymmetryofthebandimplies afairsimilarityintheshapeofthenanoparticlesandlowdegree ofaggregationinthesolution[23].TheHR-TEMimageillustrated thattheas-preparedAuNPsweresphericalinshape,thus corrob-oratingtheUV–visresults.Themeanparticlesizecalculatedfrom thedistributionofFig.1Cwas6.8±1.6nm.
Fig.5.Confocalimagesofcancerouscells.Leftcolumn:imagesacquiredwiththeconjugateof-catenin.Theconjugateshad-catenin/AuNPsratiosof(A1)6.1×10−3,
(A2)4.1×10−3and(A3)3.0×10−3.Rightcolumn:imagesacquiredwiththeconjugateofE-cadherin.TheconjugateshadE-cadherin/AuNPsratiosof(B1)6.1×10−3,(B2)
4.1×10−3and(B3)3.0×10−3.Magnification:40×.Scalebar=100m.
-catenin[24]andE-cadherin[25]areproteinsplaying impor-tant roles ascell–cell receptors, forming adherensjunctions to bind cells within tissues together. While normal cells do not overexpress-cateninandE-cadherin,enlargedamountofthese proteinsindicatescancercellaggressiveness[13].Duetotheir pro-teicnature,-cateninandE-cadherinmightundergodenaturation whensubjectedtopHotherthanthephysiologicalone.Thus,before
bioconjugation,thepHoftheAuNPscolloidalsolutionhadtobe adjustedtonear7.0andtestedagainstaggregationunderdifferent conditions.ResultsofthisstudyareshowninFig.2.Resultsrevealed thattheAuNPsareextremelystableinaqueoussolutionat differ-entpHandsalinity.Thespectraoftheas-preparedandpH-adjusted AuNPsarepracticallyoverlapped,whichdenotesexcellent stabil-ityunderdifferentpH.Smallmoleculessuchasglycerol’soxidation
Fig.6.ComparisonofconfocalimagesofcancerouscellsacquiredwithAlexaFluor®>and(A)-catenin/AuNPsconjugateand(B)E-cadherin/AuNPsconjugate.Magnification:
10×.Scalebar=100m.
productswerethenremovedviadialysisandthisprocesshadno influenceoftheshapeofthespectra.TheAuNPswerethen1:3v/v dilutedinthePBS/BSAbuffer.UnderthishighsalinityAuNPsare expectedtobeunstable,howeverinourcasethesterichindrance providedbyPVPresultedinincreasedstability.Uponintroduction oftheantibodiesthespectraofAuNPshadnosignificantchange, implyingthatthebioconjugationdidnotprovokeobvious aggre-gationofAuNPs.
Fig.3showsfluorescenceemissionspectraforpurifiedAuNPs in absenceand presence of -catenin (Fig. 3A) and E-cadherin (Fig.3B).Theexcitationwavelengthwasfixedat330nmandthe emissionrecordedintherangeof700–900nm.Theemissionband atthatrangedidnotshiftwiththeexcitationwavelength(data notshown),indicatingthatthebandwasnotduetoany scatter-ingprocess.The fluorescenceemissionswereslightly enhanced upon absorption of both -catenin (increase of 30 a.u. for the highest antibodyconcentration) and E-cadherin (increaseof 39 a.u. for the highest antibody concentration) onto the AuNPs. Such enhancement hasbeen rationalizedin terms of competi-tionbetweenadsorbingspeciesandmolecularoxygendissolvedin solution.AlqudamiandAnnapoorni[26]showedthatfluorescence enhancementtakesplacewhenBSAadsorbsonthesurfaceofsilver nanoparticles.Asthesurfaceplasmonresonance(SPR)(responsible forthefluorescencesignal)isafunctionofthesurfacefree elec-trons,morefreeelectronsledtoamoreintenseSPRsignal.The authorsarguedthattheadsorbedBSApreventedthesurfacefree electronsfrombindingwithoxygenmolecules,hencethe fluores-cencesignalwassomewhatincreased.Inourcase-cateninand E-cadherinmayhaveadsorbedonAuNPsimpedingO2toreachthe
nanoparticlesurface,anexplanationsupportedbyFig.3,wherea
fluorescencesignalincrementoccurredonlyforthelowest anti-bodyconcentration,remainingconstantatthehigherones.This meansthatasmallantibodyconcentrationissufficienttoinsulate theAuNPsfromoxygen.
Theantibody–AuNPsconjugateswerethenappliedaslabeling probesforcellimaging.Intheexperimentswefirstproducedthe conjugatesasexplainedinSection2andtheninoculatedtheminto healthyand cancerouscells. Thestrategytocombinethe speci-ficitiesofanti--cateninandanti-E-cadherinwiththefluorescent propertiesoftheAuNPstoproduceaselectivecontrastagentfor targetingcancerwasprovenefficientasshownbellow.Fig.4shows confocalmicroscopyimagesofhealthycellsincontactwithAuNPs conjugatedwithdifferentconcentrationsof antibodies.Onecan seethatthenanoparticlesareinhomogeneouslyspreadoverthe cover slitsurface regardlessofthe antibody/AuNPsratioin the conjugates. Thelack of specific binding of theconjugates with thecells isa consequenceofnormal levelsof-catenin and E-cadherinproducedbynon-cancerouscells.Weshouldmentionthat duringtheconfocalmicroscopyexperimentswithnon-cancerous cells itwasextremely difficultfindinga regionwithgood fluo-rescenceintensity.Astherearenospecificinteractionswiththe cells,thenanoparticlesarespreadovertheglasscoverslipsandthe high-localfluorescenceintensitiesareduetonon-specificAuNPs agglomeration.
Fig. 5 presents images of cancerous cells labeled with the conjugates.Theseimagesareclearlydistinguishedfromthoseof
Fig.4.Inthiscasetheantibody–AuNPsconjugatescouldspecifically bindonthecellsurfacesduetotheoverexpressed-cateninand E-cadherin.Evennuancesof thecellmembrane couldbenicely revealed,asforexampleinFig.5A2,whereagroupofcellswas
Scheme1.Reducedpreparationtimeenabledbythepresentwork.
spotted. Note that thegold nanoaprticlesare nolongerspread aroundthecells,butratherconcentratedonthem.Itisinteresting tonoticethatinFig.5A1theboardersofthecellsarebrighterthan thecenters.Since-cateninandE-cadherinaremainlymembrane proteins, their overexpression led to an increased concentra-tionoftheconjugatesinthatarea.Anotherimportantfeatureis thateven theconjugateswiththelowest antibody/AuNPsratio (Fig. 5A3 and B3) wereable tospecificallybind withthe cells, whichhasapositiveimplicationonthecostasantibodiesarenot inexpensive.
Finally, we compare the herein proposed method with a standardone forlabelingcancerouscells.The standardmethod employedconsistedofinoculatingtheAlexaFluor®488–which isanantibodyboundtoadye–withcancerouscellsfor subse-quentcellimaging.Fig.6Ashowsresultsforthisstudy,inwhich thecellsinallimageswerestainedwithboth-catenin–AuNPs conjugateandAlexaFluor® 488.Onecanseethatbothlabeling
agentsrevealthesamesites,whichisafurtherproveofthe speci-ficityofourconjugate.Furthermore,thesignalintensitiesofthe -catenin–AuNPsandAlexawerenotthatdifferent,withthatfor theAlexabeingslightlymoreintense.Therightpictureisa sig-naloverlapfrom-catenin–AuNPsandAlexa.Thebrighterareas aretheintensitycombinationsofbothlabelingagents,showing thatthe-catenin–AuNPsconjugateindeedbindscancerouscells asbothsignalingagentspopulatethesameareas.Fig.6Bpresents thesamecomparisonbutnow withtheE-cadherin–AuNPs con-jugate.Unlike withthe -catenin–AuNPs,the signalintensities ofE-cadherin–AuNPsandAlexawerepracticallythesame,which suggeststhatthecancerouscellsexpressedmoreE-cadherinthan -catenin,existingthereforesufficientofsitesforequaladsorption ofE-cadherin–AuNPsandAlexa.Fromtheseresultsoneconcludes thattheantibody/AuNPscouldefficientlyreplacethe commonly-usedsecondaryantibodyforidentificationofcolorectalcancerous cells.
Anotherpointworthtomentionisthereducedoverall prepa-rationtimewiththeantibody–AuNPsconjugates,aspresentedin
Scheme1.Thestandardprocedurerequiresincubationofprimary antibody(-cateninorE-cadherin)withAlexaFluor®488for24h,
followedbywashingandfixationstepspriorobservationunderthe microscope.Theentireproceduretakesabout27h.Ontheother hand,ourprocedurerequiresonlya1-hincubationfollowedbya
single10-minrinsingstep,whichisaclearadvantageintermsof laborandtime-saving.
4. Conclusions
Anti--catenin/AuNPs and anti-E-cadherin/AuNPsconjugates weresuccessfullyappliedforimagingcolorectalcancerouscells. UV–visresultsshowedthattheconjugatesarestableinsolutions thatresemblethephysiological medium.Based onfluorescence results,lowantibodyconcentrationsaresufficienttoachieve max-imum adsorption of antibodies onto the surface of the AuNPs. Furthermore,thehereinproposedconjugateshadsimilar perfor-mancecomparedwithastandardprocedure,withtheadvantageof havingreducedtheoverallanalysistimefrom27htoonly1h.Based ontheseresults,weenvisagetheapplicationoftheconjugatesfor routineimagingofcolorectalcancerouscells.
Acknowledgments
The authors are grateful to CNPq (grant 471794/2012-0), Capes(grantCapes/070/2012),andFAPERN/MCT/CNPq/CT-INFRA 005/2011 for the financial support. We also thank Dr. Celso Sant´ıAnna(Inmetro)forthehelpwithTEMimages.
References
[1]P.K.Jain,I.H.El-Sayed,M.A.El-Sayed,NanoToday2(2007)18–29.
[2]S.Luo,E.Zhang,Y.Su,T.Cheng,C.Shi,Biomaterials32(2011)7127–7138.
[3]R.G.Rayavarapu,P.Wilma,U.Constantin,N.P.Janine,G.V.L.Ton,M.Srirang,Int. J.Biomed.Imaging2007(2007),5-5.
[4]J.Gao,X.Huang,H.Liu,F.Zan,J.Ren,Langmuir28(2012)4464–4471.
[5]G.P.Luke,A.Bashyam,K.A.Homan,S.Makhija,Y.-S.Chen,S.Y.Emelianov, Nano-technology24(2013)455101.
[6]A.C.A.Silva,S.L.V.D.Deus,M.J.B.Silva,N.O.Dantas,Sens.Actuators,B191(2014) 108–114.
[7]P.K.Jain,K.S.Lee,I.H.El-Sayed,M.A.El-Sayed,J.Phys.Chem.B110(2006) 7238–7248.
[8]H.Du,R.-C.A.Fuh,J.Li,L.A.Corkan,J.S.Lindsey,Photochem.Photobiol.68(1998) 141–142.
[9]C.J.Murphy,A.M.Gole,J.W.Stone,P.N.Sisco,A.M.Alkilany,E.C.Goldsmith,S.C. Baxter,Acc.Chem.Res.41(2008)1721–1730.
[10]S.Parveen,R.Misra,S.K.Sahoo,Nanomed.Nanotechnol.Biol.Med.8(2012) 147–166.
[11]B.Baum,M.Georgiou,J.CellBiol.192(2011)907–917.
[13]P.C.Lunter,J.W.J.vanKilsdonk,H.vanBeek,I.M.H.A.Cornelissen,M. Berg-ers,P.H.G.M.Willems,G.N.P.vanMuijen,G.W.M.Swart,CancerRes.65(2005) 8801–8808.
[14]F.H.Brembeck,M.Rosário,W.Birchmeier,Curr.Opin.Genet.Dev.16(2006) 51–59.
[15]P.J.Morin,A.B.Sparks,V.Korinek,N.Barker,H.Clevers,B.Vogelstein,K.W. Kinzler,Science275(1997)1787–1790.
[16]P.J.Morin,BioEssays21(1999)1021–1030.
[17]L.H.S.Gasparotto,A.C.Garcia,J.F.Gomes,G.Tremiliosi-Filho,J.PowerSources 218(2012)73–78.
[18]D.J.Lewis,T.M.Day,J.V.MacPherson,Z.Pikramenou,Chem.Commun.(2006) 1433–1435.
[19]J.Polte,T.T.Ahner,F.Delissen,S.Sokolov,F.Emmerling,A.F.Thünemann,R. Kraehnert,J.Am.Chem.Soc.132(2010)1296–1301.
[20]D.Astruc,M.C.Daniel,J.Ruiz,Chem.Commun.(Camb)23(2004)2637–2649.
[21]M.C.Daniel,D.Astruc,Chem.Rev.104(2004)293–346.
[22]M. Moskovits, I. Srnova-Sloufova, B. Vlckova, J. Chem. Phys. 116 (2002) 10435–10446.
[23]N.Vigneshwaran,R.P.Nachane,R.H.Balasubramanya,P.V.Varadarajan, Carbo-hydr.Res.341(2006)2012–2018.
[24]H.Dvory-Sobol,E.Sagiv,D.Kazanov,A.Ben-Ze’ev,N.Arber,Mol.CancerTher. 5(2006)2861–2871.
[25]A.Jeanes,C.J.Gottardi,A.S.Yap,Oncogene27(2008)6920.
[26]A.Alqudami,S.Annapoorni,Plasmonics2(2007)5–13.
Biographies
KássioM.G.LimaisanassistantprofessorattheInstituteofChemistryoftheFederal
UniversityofRioGrandedoNortesince2009.HereceivedhisPh.D.insciences(2009)
fromUNICAMP(Brazil)andhewassandwich-doctoratefellow(09/2007–09/2008)
atUniversidadComplutensedeMadridintheOpticalFibreChemicalSensorsand
AppliedPhotochemistryGroup(supervisedbyDr.M.C.Moreno-Bondi)workingon
simultaneousdeterminationofheavymetalswithopticalsensors.Heistheleader
oftheResearchGroupofAppliedChemometrics(UFRN,Brazil)since2011andhis
currentresearchinterestsareonspectroscopyandchemometrics.
RaimundoF.AraújoJúniorholdsapositionofassistantprofessoratthe
Morphol-ogyDepartmentoftheFederalUniversityofRioGrandedoNorte,Brazil,since
2006.HegothisPh.D.inHealthSciencesin2005.Hisinterestsaremolecular
biologytooncology.Thefocusofhisworkistoobservetheapoptosisand
prolifer-ationofcancerouscellsuponcontactwithnanoengineeredandphototherapeutic
drugs.
AurigenaA.AraujoworksasassistantprofessorattheDepartmentofBiophysics
andPharmacologyoftheFederalUniversityofRioGrandedoNorte,Brazil,since
2004.ShegotherPh.D.inHealthSciencesin2005.Shewasapost-docfellowatthe
UniversidadAutónomadeSanLuísPotosí,Mexico,in2007.Herresearchlineisthe
searchfornewmedicinesforthetreatmentofinflammatoryprocess.
AnaLuizaC.S.L.OliveiraisaPh.D.studentinPharmaceuticalScience/PublicHealth
atFederalUniversityofRioGrandedoNorte,Brazil.Thefocusofherworkisto
correlatetheexpressionoftheE-cadherinproteinwithpathologicalvariablesin
colorectalcarcinoma.Sheisalsointerestedinstudyingtheviabilityofcancercells
upontreatmentwithphytotherapeuticextracts.
CurrentlyLuizHenriquedaSilvaGasparottoholdsapositionofassistantprofessor
atUniversityofRioGrandedoNorte,Brazil.HeobtainedhisPh.D.inSciencesin
2009,followedbyapost-docstageatTUClausthal,Germany,underthesupervision
ofProf.FrankEndres.Gasparotto’sinterestscomprisethesynthesisandapplication