• Nenhum resultado encontrado

Rev. Bras. Anestesiol. vol.63 número6 en v63n6a12

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2018

Share "Rev. Bras. Anestesiol. vol.63 número6 en v63n6a12"

Copied!
1
0
0

Texto

(1)

Rev Bras Anestesiol. 2013;63(6):511

0104-0014/$ - see front matter © 2013 Sociedade Brasileira de Anestesiologia. Published by Elsevier Editora Ltda. All rights reserved. doi: 10.1016/j.bjane.2013.09.002

Oficial Publication of the Brazilian Society of Anesthesiology www.sba.com.br

Revista

BRasileiRa de

anestesiologia

LETTER TO THE EDITOR

Case of anaphylaxis induced by

rocuronium treated with sugammadex

Dear Editor,

First, I would like to congratulate the authors for the article entitled “Case of Anaphylaxis Induced by Rocuronium Treated with Sugammadex”, recently published in the

Revista Brasileira de Anestesiologia (Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology).1

While reading the article, two points deserving some considerations were noted. First, an anaphylactic reaction was reported after rocuronium administration; however, as described by the author himself, it is impossible to differentiate an anaphylactic from an anaphylactoid reaction based only on clinical data.1 Differential diagnosis

is made by laboratory tests. The author cited an article reporting a similar case in which differential diagnosis was made, and thus the term “anaphylaxis” may use.2

The second observation relates to the time of medications used. In the third paragraph of the Case Report section, it is reported that immediately after intubation signs of a possible allergic reaction were noted and treatment initiated. Doses of epinephrine (0.30 mg) were used, repeated every 5 minutes, totaling 1.5 mg of this medication. In the next paragraph, the authors report

that 700 mg of sugammadex were used 5 minutes after administration of rocuronium, followed by another dose of epinephrine (0.30 mg). Finally, in the fifth paragraph of the Discussion section, it is reported that sugammadex was administered 25 minutes after rocuronium.1

Thus, it is clear that there is an inconsistency in the administration times of medications and, hence, in total dose of adrenaline. Due to the great importance of the subject and high mortality of this complication, data description requires accuracy in order to become an aid tool for future cases.

Luís Otávio Estevesa,b

aInstituto Penido Burnier, Campinas, SP, Brazil bCentro Médico Campinas, Campinas, SP, Brazil

E-mail: otavioanestesio@gmail.com (L.O. Esteves).

References

1. Barbosa FT, Cunha RM. Caso de anailaxia induzida por rocurônio tratado com o auxílio de sugamadex. Rev Bras Anestesiol. 2012; 62:538-42.

Referências

Documentos relacionados

Experiencia y objetivos: Fueron evaluados los riesgos de la contaminación de propofol al 2%, remifentanilo y pantoprazol y los efectos de esos agentes in vitro en el crecimiento

This prospective study, which assessed children’s preoperative anxiety, found that, regardless of the quality of information offered to guardians at the surgical center

El uso del folleto informativo con la finalidad de aumen- tar el conocimiento y la satisfacción y de reducir la ansie- dad de los responsables se propuso en este ensayo, como

The primary objective of this study was to evaluate whether the use of femoral nerve block (FNB) associated with spinal anesthesia would improve the

Sin embargo, y pese a las técnicas usadas, todavía existen quejidos de dolor fuerte entre los pacientes sometidos a la RLCA, lo que sugiere que se hacen necesarios

Evaluated data were postoperative pain intensity, worst pain experienced at each period of time (first period: between anesthesia and first assessment; second period:

Los datos evaluados fueron: intensidad del dolor postoperatorio, intensidad del dolor más fuerte sentido en cada período (período 1 entre la anestesia y la primera

The aim of this case report was to present the sedation technique with propofol and remifentanil combined with ropivacaine for scalp block in neurosurgery for tumor