• Nenhum resultado encontrado

Rev. bras. ortop. vol.47 número2 en v47n2a01

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2018

Share "Rev. bras. ortop. vol.47 número2 en v47n2a01"

Copied!
2
0
0

Texto

(1)

Editorial

Of orthopedists and pilots

Some professions carry great responsibility, and this responsibility is what weighs most heavily in practicing these professions.

In most instances, the professional is not the one who furnishes the elements needed for the quality of the service provided to be ideal, but it falls to this professional to judge whether what has been made available is enough for him to accept responsibility for carrying out the task.

Airplane pilots are among these professionals, given that on every light, the lives of many

people depend on him: people who, in using the service that he commands, are not seeking to risk their lives but just to be transported.

The aircraft model is chosen through a political-economic decision by the company, which the pilot does not participate in. Moreover, the airworthiness of the plane is maintained by a team of mechanics who he does not know but who he needs to trust, since a maintenance failure could be disastrous.

The fuel is loaded at each airport and this also has to be totally trustworthy, for obvious reasons.

The same applies to the airports generally, and to the air trafic controllers, both in the airport control tower and along the light path.

The pilot just has to judge all these services and accept them or veto them. The power of veto is fundamental for exercising his activity.

The entire immense infrastructure that is set up for aircraft to take off and transport passengers is conditional on approval by one individual: the person responsible for the plane, i.e. the pilot.

Our activity greatly resembles that of a pilot. Perhaps the difference lies in the number of people and the fact that in principle, our own lives are not involved in the surgical operation.

Although the quality of the hospital, its state of asepsis and the nursing care are not directly under

our inluence, they are our responsibility. Any failure at one point in this chain will be attributed to

(2)

The care in the surgical theater, the nursing involved and the basic set of instruments made available are not chosen according to our guidance, but they are our responsibility, since any failure resulting from any of these items will be attributed to the surgeon in charge.

With regard to the choice of surgical material and what is to be implanted, comments are

superluous.

I do not know whether pilots have to choose between three options of fuel to know which

one will be released for use; or whether they can only ly a given aircraft after authorization from

someone who does not about planes; or whether some airports can be used by certain passengers and not by others. Is it possible that in using certain equipment, an employee of the company that supplies the equipment is present in the command cockpit giving guidance and suggesting other types?

I do not believe that this type of interference exists in pilots’ professional practice, but I am sure that if it existed, pilots would not accept any of these options. They would demand the best conditions for preserving their passengers’ lives and their own.

We, in accepting hospitals under inadequate conditions and accepting material selection based on any criterion other than our own, place our patients and our professional lives at risk.

In both professions, the responsibility is personal and non-transferable. There is no institutional ethics: just personal ethics.

Pilots undergo constant training on simulators and rigorous medical examinations to be able to exercise their responsibility.

For us to accept our responsibility, we have a long history of academic training, an arduous

and dificult period of medical residence, a rigorous selection examination and constant continuing education. We reine our responsibility through every congress that we attend, every article that we

read, every case that we discuss and every opinion that we hear.

We cannot, under any circumstance, make concessions. No one has the power to contest, or is capable of contesting our judgment, since the person with the responsibility has the authority to choose and select everything for which he is answerable. This is a legal precept.

Just as we expect that pilots will exercise their responsibility with the greatest rigor, let us exercise ours.

And have a good trip

Referências

Documentos relacionados

Com base nos autores citados referente ao comparecimento do público nos estádios e na necessidade de se desenvolver um melhor entendimento do estágio atual

Mesmo que uma certa ameaça de remoção dos Estados Unidos tenha afastado os moradores de Baltimore da proposta de migrar para o Haiti, já que por mais interessante

É importante destacar que as práticas de Gestão do Conhecimento (GC) precisam ser vistas pelos gestores como mecanismos para auxiliá-los a alcançar suas metas

Se consideró que las ovejas habian producido por lo menos un cuerpo lúteo (CL) siempre que los niveles plasmáticos de progesterona fuera n superiores a 0,5

 The studied plants were divided in three groups: cultivated food plants, wild edible plants and wild medicinal plants and in each group different parts (young shoots, leaves,

Partindo para uma análise do ponto de equilíbrio considerando o custo de oportunidade e o custo de capital, teremos a seguinte modificação de valores e análise: custos fixos somados

1º Aspecto tem a ver com a parte da personalidade, a própria formação que as pessoas tiveram tanto lá fora como as coisas são aqui estruturadas. Eu estou a falar agora da minha

O diagnóstico das patologias associadas ao ferro passa pelo hemograma, uma ferramenta essencial, e por testes séricos, como ferro sérico, saturação da transferrina, receptor solúvel