REVISTA
BRASILEIRA
DE
Entomologia
AJournalonInsectDiversityandEvolutionw w w . r b e n t o m o l o g i a . c o m
Review
Extant
diversity
and
estimated
number
of
Gracillariidae
(Lepidoptera)
species
yet
to
be
discovered
in
the
Neotropical
region
Rosângela
Brito
a,
Jurate
De
Prins
b,
Willy
De
Prins
b,
Olaf
H.H.
Mielke
c,
Gislene
L.
Gonc¸
alves
d,e,
Gilson
R.P.
Moreira
f,∗aUniversidadeFederaldoParaná,ProgramadePós-Graduac¸ãoemEntomologia,Curitiba,PR,Brazil bRoyalBelgianInstituteofNaturalSciences,Brussels,Belgium
cUniversidadeFederaldoParaná,DepartamentodeZoologia,Curitiba,PR,Brazil
dUniversidadeFederaldoRioGrandedoSul,InstitutodeBiociências,DepartamentodeGenética,PortoAlegre,RS,Brazil eUniversidaddeTarapacá,InstitutodeAltaInvestigación,Antofagasta,Arica,Chile
fUniversidadeFederaldoRioGrandedoSul,DepartamentodeZoologia,PortoAlegre,RS,Brazil
a
r
t
i
c
l
e
i
n
f
o
Articlehistory: Received28April2016 Accepted9June2016 Availableonline28June2016 AssociateEditor:RodrigoFeitosa Keywords:
Leafminermoths Microlepidoptera Speciesrichness
Phylogeneticdiversification
a
b
s
t
r
a
c
t
Gracillariidae(Lepidoptera)arecommonlyknownbytheleafminerhabitfoundinthelarvalstageof mostspecies.Byusingworldwide,publicdatabasesonspeciesdiversityandDNAsequencesavailablefor extantgracillariidspecies,wedeterminedchangesintherateoftaxonomicspeciesdescriptionsthrough time,mappedtheirspatialdistributions,examinedtheirphylogeneticdiversification,andestimatedthe numberofspeciesyettobedescribedforthefamilyintheNeotropics.Werecovered185species,a numberthatissmallerthanthatfoundinanyotherbiogeographicregion.However,itwasestimatedthat atleast3875additionalspeciesremaintobedescribedintheregion.Phylogeneticdiversificationshowed apatternofexpandingdiversity.Afewentomologistshavebeeninvolvedwithgracillariidtaxonomyin theNeotropics,having39%ofthespeciesbeendescribedbyasingletaxonomist.Inmostofsuchcases, descriptionswerebasedontheadultsonly.Afewspecieshavebeendescribedfrombiomesknownto havesomeofthegreatestdiversityonearth,suchastheAtlanticForest.Thus,suchascenarioresultsfrom lowsamplingandscarcetaxonomicactivitythathasprevailedforthisfamilyofmothsintheNeotropics. Itmayalsobeassociatedwiththeirsmallbodysizeandtothefactthatgracillariidsdonotseemtobe attractedtolighttrapsasmuchasothermoths,whichmaketheircollectionandidentificationbynon expertsdifficult.Wealsosuggestedscientificandpoliticalactionsthatcouldbeadoptedtoovercome suchanunfavorablescenario.
©2016SociedadeBrasileiradeEntomologia.PublishedbyElsevierEditoraLtda.Thisisanopen accessarticleundertheCCBY-NC-NDlicense(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
Introduction
Sincethepioneer,comprehensiveinventoriesthathavebeen conductedonthediversityofterrestrialarthropodsingeneral,it becameevidentthattheLepidopteraareamongthemostdiverse group of insects existing in tropical rainforests, including the Neotropicalregion(Erwin,1982;Lawtonetal.,1998;Bassetetal., 2012).Thesestudiesalsoledtothepredictionthatthediversityof Lepidopterainsuchareasismuchgreaterinnumbersthanwhat wereally know,andthus manyeitherremaintobediscovered and/orneedtobetaxonomicallydescribed.Infact,severalsurveys carriedoutaposterioriinsuchregionsfocusingonLepidoptera havegivensupporttosuchaprediction(e.g.Brehmetal.,2005;
∗ Correspondingauthor.
E-mail:gilson.moreira@ufrgs.br(G.R.P.Moreira).
Janzenetal.,2005;Linaresetal.,2009;Leesetal.,2014;Zenker
etal.,2016).Thesestudies,however,withtheexceptionofLees
etal.(2014),havebeenconductedwithprimaryattentionon
samp-lingofthemacrolepidoptera.Thisartificialgroupthatincludesthe Papilionoideabutterfliesandtheothermorederivedmoth super-families,accountsforca.107,475species(68.27%),andthusca.2/3 ofthetotal(=154,424species)extantLepidoptera(vanNieukerken etal.,2011).However,itincludesonly34familiesintheOrder;that is,25.56%ofthetotal(=133families).Fromaspeciesrank perspec-tive,thiswouldsuggestphylogeneticdiversification(sensuMorlon, 2014)ofyoungerlineageshasbeenproportionallygreaterin Lep-idoptera,whichissupportedbytheexistenceofasimilartrendat thegenericlevel;thatis,fromthetotalof14,655generalistedby
vanNieukerkenetal.(2011),9713(=66.28%)aremacrolepidoptera,
andtheremaining4942(=33.72%)microlepidoptera.However,one cannot rejecta priori thealternativehypothesis thatthis trend resultsatleastin partfrombias,associatedtolower collection http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rbe.2016.06.002
0085-5626/©2016SociedadeBrasileiradeEntomologia.PublishedbyElsevierEditoraLtda.ThisisanopenaccessarticleundertheCCBY-NC-NDlicense(http:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
effortsoftheolder,microlepidopteralineages,whichisexplored hereinfortheGracillariidae,asacasestudy.
Gracillariidae(Figs. 1–8)is consideredone themostdiverse microlepidopterafamilieshavinganendophagousfeedinghabitat, accountingfor105generaandmorethan1950speciesthatare distributedworldwide,exceptAntarctica(DePrinsandDePrins,
2016a).Althoughlarvaeofmostspeciesareleaf-miners,somemine
eitherstemsorfruits,andothersareflower/fruitborers,leafrollers, orgallinducers(e.g.Davis,1987;Guillénetal.,2001;Vargasand
Landry,2005;Huetal.,2011;Hansonetal.,2014;Kawakitaand
Kato,2016).ThefamilywasproposedbyStainton(1854)toascribe
atthat timethegenera GracilariaZeller,1839,CorisciumZeller,
1839,andOrnixKollar,1832.Theformerisnowasynonymof Gracil-lariaHaworth,1828,thetypegenusofthefamily.Thelattertwo aresynonymsofCaloptiliaHübner,1825,atthepresenttimealso withinGracillariidae.CaloptiliidaeFletcher,EucestidaeHampson, LithocolletidaeStaintonandOrnichidaeStaintonarenow consid-eredsynonyms ofGracillariidae(DePrinsand DePrins,2016b). Threesubfamiliesarecommonlyacceptedforthefamily: Gracil-lariinae,LithocolletinaeandPhyllocnistinae(DavisandRobinson, 1998).However,othershavebeenproposed,suchas Oecophyllem-biinae(RéalandBalachowsky,1966;Kumata,1998),Ornichinae
(Kuznetzov and Stekolnikov,1987)and Ornixolinae (Kuznetzov
andBaryshnikova,2001).Recently,themonophylyofGracillariidae
Figs.1–8.Leafmines(left)andadults(right)fromputativespeciesofNeotropicalgracillariids:(1,2)SpinivalvagauchaMoreira&Vargas(Gracillariinae)onPassifloraactinia Hook(Passifloraceae);(3,4)PorphyroselaminutaClarke(Lithocolletinae)onTrifoliumrepensLinnaeus(Fabaceae);(5,6)AngelabellatecomaeVargas&Parra (Oecophyllem-biinae)onTecomafulva(Cav.)G.Don(Bignoniaceae);(7,8)Phyllocnistissp.(Phyllocnistinae)onBaccharisanomalaDC.(Asteraceae).Scalebars=10,1,10,1,5,1,5,1mm, respectively.
wassupported by analysesbased onmolecular data,including foursubfamilies,whichareadoptedinthepresentstudy: Gracil-lariinae, Lithocolletinae, Phyllocnistinae and Oecophyllembiinae
(Kawaharaetal.,2011).Hypermetamorphosis,adramaticchangein
morphologyduringlarvalonthogeny,fromsap-drinkingto tissue-feedingand/orspinning(seeKumata,1978),hasbeenproposedas anapomorphyforGracillariidae(Davis,1987).However,recently
Britoetal.(2013)demonstratedthatthegracillariineSpinivalva
gauchaMoreira&Vargas,describedfromSouthernBrazildoesnot havesap-feedinglarvalinstars.Ontheotherhand,Kuznetzovand
Stekolnikov(1987)suggestedGracillariidaeareuniquewithin
Lep-idopterabyhavingmalegenitaliawithonlyfourpairsofmuscles andwithoutagnathos,andfemalegenitalia,withashort,laterally flattenedovipositor,whichshouldbefurtherexplored.Although ithasbeenacceptedthattherearemanyspeciesofGracillariidae stilltobedescribedintheNeotropicalregion(DavisandWagner,
2011;Britoetal.,2012;Leesetal.,2014), asfarasweare
con-cernednodataavailablesupportingsuchapredictionhasbeenever comparativelyexplored.
Byusing dataexistingin theliteratureandpublicdatabases availableaselectronicpublicationsintheWorldWideWeb,we hereinretrievedtaxonomicdataonNeotropicalgracillariids, list-ingthevalidspeciesbyauthorandyearofdescription,andmap thedistributionoftypesaccordingtocorrespondingbiogeographic regionsandpoliticalborders.Then,weadjustedtheannual vari-ationofthedescribedspeciestoalogisticmodel,predictingthe numberofgracillariidspeciesstilltobedescribedinthe Neotrop-ics,aswellasthetimeneededtoachievethatgoalgiventhepresent timerateofspeciesdescriptionsintheregion.Also,byusingDNA sequencesavailableinpublicdatabasesweestimatedthe phyloge-neticdiversificationofGracillariidaeintheNeotropicsthroughout time.Theseandadditionalfindingssuchasonhost–plantuseare discussedincomparisontootherbiogeographicregions.By review-ingthestatusoftheknowndiversity,evaluatingtheirphylogenetic diversificationandpredictingthenumberofgracillariidspeciesyet tobedescribedintheNeotropics,weaimtoestablisha correspond-ingbasis forfuture taxonomicstudiesintheregion,suggesting researchprioritiesandscientificactions,aswellastheexistenceof potentialdifficultiestobesurpassedregardingtaxonomic impedi-ment,ifany.Wehopeourfindingswillstimulatefurtherscientific interestinNeotropicalgracillariids,notonlyfromataxonomic per-spectivebutalsotheiruseasmodelsonevolutionaryecologybased studies,particularlythosefocusingonhost-plantinteraction,and alsoonconservationbiology.
Materialandmethods
Dataonspeciesdiversitywerecompiledfromthecatalogon NeotropicalGracillariidaeprovidedbyDavisandMiller(1984)and thepublicdatabaseonWorldGracillariidaemaintainedbyDePrins
andDePrins(2016a).TheglobaldatabaseofGracillariidae
(Lepi-doptera)waslaunchedin2006asanonlinesearchablecatalogof allknownGracillariidaespecies.Theemphasisisfocusedonthe followingaspects:i)completeness(taxonomicinformationonall 1956species,413synonymsofspeciesnames,8subspeciesand 309unavailable species-group names, 105 generaand 42 syn-onyms of genus-group names and 17 family-group names are foundin asearchableformat), ii)regularupdates,i.e. twiceper year,iii)presentationofcross-referencedverifieddata(dataon gracillariidtaxonomy,9054distributionrecords,7641hostplants recordsand4199parasitoidrecordsarepresentedonlinelinked withthepublicationreferenceandcitationpage),iv)generation ofdatawithuser-targetedmulti-searchablefunction(e.g.regional or country catalogs, detailed species checklists in association withtheirhostplantspecies/genera/families;v)documentationof
tri-trophic interactions of host(s)–gracillariidmoth species and theirparasitoid(s);vi)arobustgalleryof2188imageswiththeaim todocumentvisuallyeverygracillariidspeciesincludinginternal diagnosticcharactersofthelastabdominalsegments,morphology ofpre-imaginalstages,speciesbiotopes,aswellasbiologicaland ecological characteristics; vii)automatically generated country-linkedspeciesdistributionmaps;viii)typespecimens andtheir depository;ix)robustreferencelistof4806publications;x) fos-silspeciesandspeciesoriginallydescribedasgracillariidsbutlater transferredtootherfamilies.
To map the gracillariid species diversity, we adopted the regionalizationoftheNeotropicalregionasproposedbyMorrone
(2014),usingthecorrespondingshapefilethatwasprovidedby
Löwenberg-Neto(2014)toplotthedata.Theseauthorsadopteda
restrictivedefinitionoftheNeotropicalregion,excludingthe south-ernportionoftheAndeanareaandalsonorthernMexico.Toconceal thiswiththedatabaseprovidedbyDePrinsandDePrins(2016a), whoadoptedabroaderview,theseareaswerehereinincludedin theanalyses,andthustreatedinconjunctionwiththeremaining subregions(sensuCox,2001).Theideawastohaverepresentative subdivisionsfromabiogeographicperspective,withoutnecessarily takingintoaccounttheranksproposedbyMorrone(2014).
Weestimatethepotentialnumberofgracillariidspeciesstillto bedescribedintheNeotropicalregionbyadjustingthecumulative numberofdescribedspeciesthroughtime toathree-parameter logisticmodel(Ratkowsky,1990),byusingthesoftwareSigmaPlot 11.0(SystatSoftware,Inc.).Thus,weassumedthereisafinite num-berofspeciesexistingonearth.Also,thatasthenumberofrecorded speciesnearsthetotalnumberofspeciesinexistenceforagiven areaitbecomes increasinglydifficulttodiscovernewspeciesin
thatarea(Diamond,1985;Cabrero-Sa ˜nudoandLobo,2003).This
modelshowedasatisfactoryfitwhenusedrecentlybyCardosoetal.
(2015)topredictthenumberofstillundescribedmayflyspecies
existinginBrazil.Astheseauthors,thefunctionwasadjustedherein byusingtheQuasi-Newtonmethodandcriterionofconvergence 0.0001.Also,thesamedefaultvaluesadoptedbythemwereused: thatis,startingvalueof0.1andsept-widthof0.5,forallparameters. Theadjustmentwasbasedon200interactions,usingthenumber of173speciesconsideredasvalidatpresenttime,1867astheyear ofthefirstspeciesdescription,and2013,asthelastone.
We calculate the expectation for the number of lineages of Neotropicalgracillariidsinareconstructedphylogenyusing171 extantoperationaltaxonomicunits(OTUs),byconditioningonthe ageofthetreeaswellaswithassumingauniformpriorfortheage ofthetree.Weusedthebarcodeindexnumber(BIN),asystemthat clustersbarcodesequencesalgorithmically,asaproxyoflineages, sinceclustersshowhighconcordancewithspecies.Weemployed thisapproachtodocumentthediversityintheabsenceof taxo-nomicinformationformostoftheavailabledata.Sequencesofthe CytochromeoxidaseI(COI)gene(i.e.,barcodes)wereusedto recon-structthetaxonomicpositionofspeciesandgenera,mainlyfrom theBOLDand GenBank databases,but alsoincorporating novel OTUssequencedbyourresearchgroup(Tab.S1).Bucculatrixwas usedtorootthetree(basedonKawaharaetal.,2011;Wahlberg etal.,2013).SequenceswerealignedusingClustalXinMEGAv6
(Tamuraetal.,2013),accordingtodefaultparameters.Thebestfit
modelofsequenceevolution (GTR)wasimplementedaccording totheAkaikeInformationCriterionscoresforsubstitution mod-elsevaluatedusingjModeltestv.0.1.1(Darribaetal.,2012).BEAST v.2.1.3(Bouckaertet al.,2014)wasusedtoestimatethe diver-gencetimeunderaBayesianapproach(Drummondetal.,2006).An uncorrelatedlognormalmodelofratechangewasimplemented.To testwhetherthediversificationrateshavechangedovertime(i.e. increasedlineagespeciation)wecontrastedthelikelihoodvalues ofthedata(branchingtimesderivedfromthetrees)undertwo modelsofconstantspeciationrate().Twoindependentanalyses
usingastreepriorapurebirthmodelwitha=0andextinction rate=0(theYuleprocess),andabirth-deathmodelwith>0and >0,wererunusing100milliongenerationssampledevery10,000 generations.Convergencewasconfirmedbyeffectivesamplesizes over200forallparametersinTracer1.6(Rambautetal.,2014).The resultingtreesanddivergencetimesestimatedunderdifferenttree priorsweresimilar.BayesFactoranalysiswasperformedunderthe smoothedmarginallikelihoodestimateandwith1000bootstrap replicatescomputedinTracerv.1.6,butitdidnotprovidestrong supportforselectinganyofthepriors(BF<2).Wechosetousethe treesreconstructedunderthebirth–deathprocesstreepriorasit accountsforbothspeciationandextinction(Gernhard,2008).The timecalibration(inmillionsofyears[Ma])wascalculatedusing asecondorderdateforthegroupGracillariidae+Bucculatricidae, proposedbyWahlbergetal.(2013).Weappliedanormal distribu-tionforthepriorwithameanof115.34Ma(108.34–122.34;99% CI).Toexamine(visually)thetemporalpatternoflineage diversi-fication,meansemi-logarithmiclineagethroughtime(LTT)plots wereconstructedusingTracerv1.6with95%confidenceintervals generatedonthefinalBEASTtrees.
Results
Atotalof185GracillariidaespeciesfortheNeotropicalregion (Fig. S1)were recovered,belonging tofour subfamiliesand 26 genera(Tab. S2).The Gracillariinae werethe mostrepresented (145species),followedbytheLithocolletinae(21), Phyllocnisti-nae(17)andOecophyllembiinae(02)(Fig.S2).Correspondingtype
Fig.10.Annualvariationinnumberofgracillariidspeciesdescribedforthe Neotrop-icalregion.
localitiesarescattereddistributedinspace,varyinginnumberfrom zerospeciesintheSouth-easternAmazoniandominionto42inthe Pacificdominion(Fig.9).MostNeotropicalcountriesholdatleast onetypelocality;Brazilaccountedforthegreatestnumberoftypes, followedbyEcuadorandPeru(Fig.S3).
Speciesdescription-throughtimeplotshowedanerratic pat-tern(Fig.10), starting in 1867withthe firstdescribed species, and reachinga peak between1911 and 1920when 69 species weredescribed. A total of 24 authorsaccounted for the corre-sponding descriptions. The British taxonomist Edward Meyrick producedthegreatestnumberofcontributionsinthisregard(78 species;Fig.11).Typesweredesignatedintheoriginal descrip-tionformostcases.Theyweredepositedamong16museumsthat arelocatedmostlyabroad,mainlyintheNaturalHistoryMuseum,
Fig.9. Diversityofextantgracillariidspecies(Arabicnumbers)intheNeotropics,accordingtobiogeographicalregionalizationproposedbyMorrone(2014).Asterisksindicate areasnotcontemplatedinhisrestricteddefinitionoftheNeotropicalregion(seetextforfurtherdescription).
Fig.11.NumericalcontributionsbyauthorondescriptionofgracillaridspeciesfortheNeotropicalregion.Numbersabovebarsrepresentpercentagesinrelationtothetotal numberofspecies(n=175).
Fig.12.Relativerepresentationoftypespecimensforgracillariidspeciesinthe Neotropicalregion.Numbersabovebarsrepresentpercentagesinrelationtototal numberofextantspecies(n=175).
London(UK)andtheNationalMuseumofNaturalHistory– Smith-sonianInstitution (USA)(Figs. 12 and 13).Originaldescriptions werebasedprimarilyontheadultstage,particularlyonwing vena-tion and color pattern. Data onthe genitaliaof either male or
Fig.13.Variationinnumberoftypespecimensavailableamongmuseumcollections forNeotropicalgracillarids.Numbersabovebarsrepresentpercentagesinrelation tototalnumberofspecies(n=175).SeeTabS3fordescriptionofmuseumacronyms.
femalewereprovidedforonly46(25%)intheoriginaldescriptions ofspecies.Descriptionoftheimmaturestages (eitheregg,larva orpupa)arepresented in11%ofthearticlescontainingspecies descriptionsand, regarding moleculardata(DNAsequences), in only4%(Fig.14).Host–plantspecieswererecordedin29familiesof angiosperms,Fabaceaebeingthemostcommonlyused(TableS3,
Fig.15).
Cumulativespeciesdescription-throughtimedataadjustedwell (p<0.05)totheLogisticequation(Fig.16).Annualrateofspecies description was 1.18per year. The model predicted the exist-ence of 4048 species in the Neotropicalregion. Corresponding standarderrorwas91,004(t=44.487,p<0.001).Descriptionofthe remaining3875 speciesstill to bedescribed inthe Neotropical regionwouldbecompletedintheyear2174.
Phylogeneticdiversification revealedby theLTT plotfor the GracillariidaeintheNeotropicalregionsuggestsapatternofeven speciation rates, withexpanding diversity throughout the evo-lutionary time, with progressive, exponential accumulation of lineagesuntilthelast25Mya,and anearlyconstant,linearrate fromthattothepresenttime(Fig.17).
Fig.14.Variationinnumberofarticlesregardingoriginaldescriptionson Neotropi-calgracillariidsthatwerebasedonadultsbutthatincludedalsodataeitherongross morphologyofimmaturestagesorDNAsequences.
Fig.15.VariationinnumberofrecordsforangiospermfamiliesusedashostsforgracillariidspeciesintheNeotropicalregion.Numbersabovebarsrepresentpercentagesin relationtototalnumberofplantfamilies.
Fig.16. PredictivefuturecumulativespeciesdescriptioncurvefortheGracillariidae intheNeotropicalregion,basedontheLogisticmodel.
Fig.17.Lineage-Through-Time(LTT)plotofNeotropicalGracillariidae.LTTwas plottedusing1000treesfromtheCOIdatasetanalyses.Thenumberoflineages (yaxis)isplottedagainsttime(xaxis)insuchwaythateachincreaseonthenumber oflineagesrepresentsacladogenesis(anode)inoneofthe1000phylogenetictrees. 2.Dashedredandbluelinesrepresent95%-confidenceintervalsfortimeofstarting diversificationandLLTplot,respectively.
Discussionandconclusions
Findingsinthepresentstudyprovidedstrongevidencethatthe smallnumberofknownGracillariidaefortheNeotropicalregion resultsfromundersampling,associatedwithlowtaxonomic activ-ityonthefamilythroughouthistoryintheregion.Itcallsattention tothefact thatsucha numberis thesmallest(8%ofthetotal)
foundforanyotherbiogeographicregionintheworld(Fig.S1). Thisisnotexpectedgiventhesizeanddiversityofplantsknown toexistintheNeotropicalregion.Inotherwords,thistrenddoes notfindsupportonwhatisobservedforotherLepidoptera fam-ilieswhoseworldwidediversityisbetterknown.Forexample,if weconsiderGeometridae,PyralidaeandNymphalidae,this rela-tioninspeciesdiversitydoesnotsustain;tothecontrary,forthese families diversity is greater in theNeotropics compared tothe PalaearcticandNearctic(FigS5),thetwogreatestbiogeographic regionsintermsofareaonearth.Itisimportanttomentionthatthe larvalstageofmanymacrolepidopteranfamiliesareexternal feed-ers,andmanyareeitheroligophagousorpolyphagous.Asalready mentioned,larvaeofgracillariidsingeneralareinternalfeeders, havinga specializedfeedingapparatusand thusarehighly spe-cificintermsofhost–plantuse,manybeingmonophagous(Davis, 1987).Thus,foragivenarea,comparativelytosuchlepidopteran families, one would expectthe diversity of Gracillariidaetobe moreinfluencedbythatofplants,andinconsequenceshouldbe greater.Thistrendwouldnotbeexpectedonlyincaseof differ-encesinageandvariation ofhistorical diversificationrates due toanyreason,whichremains tobetestedfor these macrolepi-dopteranfamiliesin theNeotropics.However,Gracillariidaeare knowntobemucholderthanthesefamilies(DavisandRobinson, 1998),andweprovidedevidencehereinthatitsdiversificationin theNeotropicshasprogressivelyexpandedatanexponentialrate until25Mya,andataconstantratethereafteruntilthepresent. Thispatternofspeciationrateovertimehasoftenbeeninterpreted asadiversity-dependenteffectresultingfromasaturationofniche spacefollowingadaptiveradiations(PhillimoreandPrice,2008;
RaboskyandLovette,2008;EtienneandHaegeman,2012).In
addi-tion,LTTplotresultsaresensitivetoincompletetaxonsampling
(Neeetal.,1994;Ricklefs,2007),whichlikelyaffectedtheestimates
inthecaseofgracillariids.Inspiteofthis,asafirstphylogenetic diversificationanalysisongracillariids,we wereabletorecover evenratesofspeciationthroughouttheevolution,indicatingthat Neotropicallineageshave been thetargetof thediversification processfor alongtime inevolutionaryhistory. Thus,we found noindicationandhencerefutethehypothesisforoccurrenceofa greaterrateofdiversificationearlyinthegracillariidphylogeny.In otherwords,thereisnoindicationfortheexistenceofanegative balancebetweenspeciationandextinctionratesthatwouldlead totheexistenceoflowdiversityofgracillariidsintheNeotropical region.
Infactourdatashowsthatthenumberofgracillariidspecies describeduptonowfromtheNeotropicalregionisfarfrom real-istic.Forexample,theParanádominion,withinwhichtheAtlantic forestislocated,accountedonlyfor7species.TheAtlanticforest isknownasoneoftheareaswiththegreatestdiversityofplants andanimalsonearth,beingextremely richinendemics(Myers
etal., 2000;Carnavalet al.,2009;Freitas etal.,2011).
Approx-imately50%ofalmostseventhousandspeciesofplantsexisting intheareaareendemics(Stemannetal.,2009).Asalready men-tioned,leaf-minermothsarehighlyhost–plantspecific,andbased onthis,Britoetal.(2012,2013)predictedthathundredsof unde-scribed,endemicgracillariidspeciesshouldexistin theAtlantic forest.Indeed,severalgracillariidspeciesrearedfromleaves col-lectedinthesouthernpartoftheAtlanticforest,mostbelonging toangiospermfamiliesnotrecoveredashostplantofgracillariids inthepresentsurveyfortheNeotropics,awaitfordescriptionin ourlaboratory.OtherareasinBrazil,suchasthecentraland north-easternportionsoftheChacoandominion(CerradoandCaatinga biomes),andtheoccidentalAmazonareahavebeentraditionally misrepresentedinLepidopteracollectionsingeneral,duetolow samplingeffortsappliedfortheseinsectsinsuchareas(Santosetal.,
2008a,b).Recently,inasurveycarriedoutinsmallareasofFrench
GuianaandEcuador,Leesetal.(2014)estimatethecorresponding gracillariidrichnesstobe240species,fromwhichapproximately 85%arebelievedtorepresentnewspeciestoscience.While sur-veyinggracillariidsassignedtothegenusPhyllocnistisZellerina localizedareainCostaRica,DavisandWagner(2011)cametothe conclusionthattherichnessforthisgenusaloneshouldaccountfor hundredsofspeciesintheNeotropicalregion.Thistrendmaywell beextendedtothetemperateportionsoftheNeotropicalregion. ThegracillariidfaunaoftheSouthernConeof SouthAmericain particularis largelyunexplored,andthis regionaccountsforat least18,139speciesofplants,amongwhichca.43%areendemics
(ZuloagaandBelgrano,2015).
Thus,itisnotsurprisingthatthepredictionmadeinthisstudy suggeststhatthenumberofgracillariidspeciesinthe Neotrop-icalregioniscirca20timesgreater.Itisalsoimportanttonote thatthetaxonomicdescriptionsofsuchunknownspecieswould becompletedonlyabouttwocenturiesfromnow.Thisestimate, however,wasbasedonthelowcollectionintensityandscarce tax-onomyactivityongracillariidsthathavehistoricallyprevailedin theregion,asalreadymentioned.Thus,suchtimemaybealtered substantiallyinthefuture,dependinguponchangesinpriorities andtheinvestmentinfieldandlaboratoryresearch.Intensive sur-veysforgracillariidspecieswhencarriedoutinrichbiomes(e.g.
Leesetal.,2014)wouldsubstantiallyspeedupthecurve,reducing thetimetoreachsuchaplateau.Thiswouldbeparticularlytrue ifmodernmolecularbiologytechniques,suchasDNAbarcoding (sensuHebertetal.,2003)areusedinconjunctionwithtraditional alphataxonomicmethods.UseofDNAsequencesinthiscasewould facilitatenotonlytheidentificationofadultspecimensthatmaybe collectedbyusinganykindoftrap,butparticularly,inthe associa-tionwiththeirimmaturestagescollecteddirectlyfromhost–plants, andviceversa.
Ourdatashowedclearlythattheunderlyingcausesforpaucity intheknowledgeofgracillariiddiversityintheNeotropicsfitinto thetypicalissuesinvolvedinwhattaxonomistscalledlatelythe “taxonomicimpediment”(fordiscussion,seeLipscombetal.,2003;
Scotlandetal.,2003;Wheeler,2004;Carvalhoetal.,2007).Inother
words,whathasobstructedprogressofgracillariidtaxonomyin theNeotropics is primarily thescarce activityof specialists on suchafaunathroughouthistory.Correspondingspecies descrip-tionshavebeenlowanderraticintime,andwereprovidedina superiornumberbyforeigntaxonomiststhateventuallyworked withNeotropicalgracillariids,mostlyin thefirsthalfofthelast century.Consequently,correspondingtypesweredepositedmostly
abroad,andmoreimportantly,nomajor,wellcuratedcollection ofgracillariidshaseverbeencompiledfortheregion.Therewas no indication in this study that such a situation varies much amongNeotropicalcountries.Justtogiveoneexample,theSerra Bonitacollection(Camacãn,Bahia,Brazil),oneofthegreatest col-lectionsonmicrolepidoptera existingin theNeotropicalregion, hascirca1200pinned-driedpreservedadultsofgracillariidsthat are placed into one drawer (V.O. Becker, pers.comm.). In our opinion,however,additionalissues inherenttotheseleafminer mothsinparticularhavecontributedtothemaintenanceofapoor knowledge about theirtaxonomy in theregion, and should be takenintoaccountwhenestablishingpoliciesneededtoovercome such an undesirable scenario.First, as typical microlepidopter-ans, gracillariids are not easy to workwith due to theirsmall size,requiringextraabilityfromtaxonomiststomountthem,and especiallyduringdissectionsneededfortaxonomicdescriptions, asforexampletheirgenitalia.Thus,theexistenceofappropriate equipment,suchashighresolutionlightstereomicroscopesand scanningelectronmicroscopefacilities,andcorresponding train-ing,areimportant inthiscase. Second,theydonot seemtobe much attracted to light (Vári, 1961), and thus theuse of light trapsmaybelessefficienttocapturethemasadultscomparedto nocturnalmacrolepidopterans.Thismeansthatothermethodsof capture,includingrearingtheadultsfromhost–plantmines,are desirable,leading tobetterresultsinmany cases.Searchingfor mines,however,isatimeconsumingactivity,andsometimesthe larvaeoccurunderlowdensitiesandaredifficulttoaccess,asfor exampleinthecanopy.Third,recentstudieshaveindicatedthat forsomegracillariidlineages,asforexampleinthegenus Phyl-locnistisZeller,specificvariationisgreaterintheimmaturestages comparedtotheadults(DavisandWagner,2011;Britoetal.,2012). Andthus,locationofhost–plantsandrearingofthesestagesarenot onlydesirablebutrequiredforanaccurateidentificationinsuch cases.
Correspondingknowledgeaboutgracillariidbiologyingeneral isalsoattheinfancylevel intheNeotropics,exceptforspecies ofeconomicimportance,asforexamplethosewiththepotential foruseasbiologicalcontrolagentsofinvasiveplants(e.g.Davis
etal.,1991;McKayetal.,2012).PhyllocnistiscitrellaStainton,a
cos-mopolitangracillariidspeciesrecentlyintroducedintotheregion, becominganimportantpestofCitrusorchardsinmanyNeotropical countries,hasbeenthefocusofseveralstudies(e.g.Vargasetal.,
1998;ChagasandParra,2000;Jahnkeetal.,2005;Santosetal.,
2008a,b).ThebiologyoftheleafminerPorphyroselaminutaClarke,
whichcausesdamageonTrifoliumrepensinUruguaywasexplored
byBentancourtandScatoni(2007).Additionalstudiesthatdonot
focusontaxonomicdescriptionsareuncommonfor Neotropical gracillariidspecieswithoutanyapparenteconomicinterest(but
seeStorey-Palmaetal.,2012,2014;Maita-Maitaetal.,2015).On
theotherhand,theseleafminermothshavebeenstudiedabroad fromseveralbiologicalperspectives,andtheyhavebeensuggested tobeusedasmodelsinstudiesinvolvingtheevolutionofinsect host–plantinteractions. Thisisparticularlyduetothedramatic changesinlarvamorphology(hypermetamorphosis)foundinmost lineages(seeDavis,1987)thatareassociatedwithveryspecialized endophagousfeedinghabits(Wagneretal.,2000;Bodyetal.,2015). Theexistenceofhostshiftshasbeenreported,withstrongevidence fortheexistenceofco-speciationwithhost–plantsinsomecases
(OhshimaandYoshizawa,2006;Ohshima,2008).Also,some
gracil-lariidspecieshaveamutualisticassociationwithplantsbyacting aspollinatorsintheadultstageandfeedingaslarvaeonthe repro-ductivestructuresofsuchplants(Kawakitaetal.,2004;Kawakita
andKato,2006;Zhangetal.,2012).Allthesepervasiveavenues
inresearch,whichmustbeprecededbyasolidtaxonomic back-ground,remaintobeexploredfortheNeotropicalgracillariidfauna ingeneral.
In summary, it was herein clearly demonstrated that the diversityand biology of Neotropicalgracillariids remainlargely unknown,whichisattributedparticularlytotheexistenceofa tax-onomicimpediment,prevailingthroughouttheregion.Thus,the establishmentofscientificpoliciesbygovernmentsofallcountries isurgentinordertospeedupgracillariidtaxonomyandthusto overcomesuchanundesirablescenariointheNeotropics(foran exampleofsuchpolicies,seeAguiaretal.,2009).Finally,itisalso importanttomentionthatasfarasweareconcerned,no Neotropi-calgracillariidspecieshasbeentakenintoaccountuptonowfrom aconservationbiologyperspective.Asalreadymentioned, there aremany speciesinthisfamilythroughoutdifferentgeographic dominionsintheNeotropicalregionthatarespecialistsonrare and/orendemicplants(e.g.Davis,1994;VargasandLandry,2005;
VargasandParra,2005;Mundacaetal.,2013;Britoetal.,2013).By
beingdependentonendemichostplantsataregionalscale,these speciesinparticularareundercomparativelygreaterthreat,since suchplantsareusuallylocalizedindistribution(Lewinsohnetal., 2005).Touncoverfurthersuchkindsofhiddendiversityof gracil-lariidspecies,andthustosetthebasisfortheirconservationbefore extinction,wesuggestendemicplantsinparticularshouldbe prior-itizedonhost-focusedinventoriesfortheirassociatedleafminers intheNeotropics.
Conflictsofinterest
Theauthorsdeclarenoconflictsofinterest.
Acknowledgements
WearegratefultoCarlosLopezVaamonde(INRA)forallowingus toaccessbarcodedataintheBOLDSystemGracillariidaeprojects. Thanksarealsoduetwoanonymousreviewersforimportant sug-gestionsmadetothefinalversionofthemanuscript.R.Britoand G.L.Gonc¸alvesweresupported,respectivelybyaCNPqDoctoral ScholarshipandaPostdoctoralCAPESFellowship(PNPD),andO. H.H.MielkeandG.R.P.MoreirabygrantsfromCNPq.Thisarticleis dedicatedtoHéctorA.Vargas(UTA)whoearlyinthisdecadekindly introducedG.R.P.MoreiraandR.BritotothestudyofNeotropical gracillariids.
AppendixA. Supplementarydata
Supplementarydataassociatedwiththisarticlecanbefound,in theonlineversion,atdoi:10.1016/j.rbe.2016.06.002.
References
Aguiar,A.P.,Santos,B.F.,Couri,M.S.,Rafael,J.A.,Costa,C.,Ide,S.,Duarte,M.,Grazia, J.,Schwertner,C.F.,Freitas,A.V.,Azevedo,C.O.,2009.Insecta.In:Rocha,R.M., Boeger,W.A.(orgs),EstadodaarteeperspectivasparaaZoologianoBrasil. EditoraUFPR,Curitiba,pp.131–155.
Basset,Y.,Cizek,L.,Cuénoud,P.,Didham,R.K.,Guilhaumon,F.,Missa,M.,Novotny, V.,Ødegaard,F.,Roslin,T.,Schmidl,J.,Tishechkin,A.K.,Winchester,N.N.,Roubik, D.W.,Aberlenc,H.P.,Bail,J.,Barrios,H.,Bridle,J.R.,Casta ˜no-Meneses,G.,Corbara, B.,Curletti,G.,Rocha,D.W.,Bakker,D.,Delabie,J.H.,Dejean,A.,Fagan,L.L.,Floren, A.,Kitching,R.L.,Medianero,E.,Miller,S.E.,Oliveira,G.E.,Orivel,J.,Pollet,M., Rapp,M.,Ribeiro,S.P.,Rosin,Y.,Schmidt,J.B.,Sørensen,L.,Leponce,M.,2012. Arthropoddiversityinatropicalforest.Science338,1481–1484.
Bentancourt,C.M.,Scatoni,I.B.,2007.MorphologyofbiologyofPorphyroselaminuta Clarke1953(Lepidoptera:Gracillariidae,Lithocolletinae)inUruguay.Neotrop. Entomol.36,514–519.
Body,M.,Burlat,V.,Giron,D.,2015.Hypermetamorphoisinaleaf-minerallows insectstocopewithaconfinednutritionalspace.Arth.-PlantInt.9,75–84. Bouckaert,R.,Heled,J.,Kuhnert,D.,Vaughan,T.,Wu,C.-H.,Xie,D.,Suchard,M.A.,
Rambaut,A.,Drummond,A.J.,2014.BEAST:2asoftwareplatformforBayesian evolutionaryanalysis.PLoSComput.Biol.10(4),e1003537.
Brehm,G.,Pitkin,L.M.,Hilt,N.,Fiedler,K.,2005.MontaneAndeanrainforestsarea globaldiversityhotspotofgeometridmoths.J.Biogeogr.32,1621–1627.
Brito,R.,Gonc¸alves,G.L.,Vargas,H.A.,Moreira,G.R.P.,2012.Anewspeciesof Phylloc-nistisZeller(Lepidoptera:Gracillariidae)fromsouthernBrazil,withlife-history descriptionandgeneticcomparisontocongenericspecies.Zootaxa3582,1–16. Brito,R.,Gonc¸alves,G.L.,Vargas,H.A.,Moreira,G.R.P.,2013.AnewBrazilian Pas-sifloraleafminer:Spinivalvagaucha,gen.n.,sp.n.(Lepidoptera,Gracillariidae, Gracillariinae),thefirstgracillariidwithoutasap-feedinginstar.ZooKeys291, 1–26.
Cabrero-Sa ˜nudo,F.J.,Lobo,J.M.,2003.Estimatingthenumberofspeciesnotyet describedandtheircharacteristics:thecaseofWesternPalaearcticdungbeetles species(Coleoptera,Scarabaeoidea).Biodiv.Conserv.12,147–166.
Cardoso,M.N.,Shimano,Y.,Nabout,J.C.,Juen,L.,2015.Anestimateofthepotential numberofmayflyspecies(Ephemeroptera,Insecta)stilltobedescribedinBrazil. Rev.Brasil.Entomol.59,147–153.
Carnaval,A.C.,Hickerson,M.J.,Haddad,C.F.B.,Rodrigues,M.T.,Moritz,C.,2009. Sta-bilitypredictsgeneticdiversityintheBrazilianAtlanticforesthotspot.Science 323,785–789.
Carvalho,M.R.,Bockmann,F.A.,Amorim,D.S.,Brandão,C.R.F.,Vivo,M.,Figueiredo, J.L.,Britski,H.A.,Pinna,M.C.C.,Menezes,N.A.,Marques,F.P.L.,Papavero,N., Can-cello,E.M.,Crisci,J.V.,McEachran,J.D.,Schelly,R.C.,Lundberg,J.G.,Gill,A.C., Britz,R.,Wheeler,Q.D.,Stiassny,M.L.J.,Parenti,L.R.,Page,L.M.,Wheeler,W.C., Faivovich,J.,Vari,R.P.,Grande,L.,Humphries,C.J.,DeSalle,R.,Ebach,M.C.,Nelson, G.J.,2007.Taxonomicimpedimentorimpedimenttotaxonomy?Acommentary onsystematicandtheCybertoxonomic-Automationparadigm.Evol.Biol.3/4, 140–143.
Chagas,M.C.M.,Parra,J.R.P.,2000.PhyllocnistiscitrellaStainton(Lepidoptera: Gracil-lariidae):técnicadecriac¸ãoebiologiaemdiferentestemperaturas.An.Soc. Entomol.Brasil29,227–235.
Cox,C.C.,2001.Thebiogeographicregionsreconsidered.J.Biogeogr.28,511–523. Darriba,D.,Taboada,G.L.,Doallo,R.,Posada,D.,2012.jModelTest2:moremodels,
newheuristicsandparallelcomputing.Nat.Methods9,772.
Davis,D.R., 1987.Gracillariidae.In:Stehr,F.W.(Ed.),ImmatureInsects,vol. I. Kendall/HuntPublishingCompany,Dubuque,pp.372–374.
Davis,D.R.,1994.NeotropicalMicrolepidopteraXXV.Newleaf-miningmothsfrom Chile,withremarksonthehistoryandcompositionofPyllocnistinae.Trop.Lep. 5,65–75.
Davis,D.R.,Miller,S.E.,1984.Gracillariidae.In:Heppner,J.B.(Ed.),Atlasof Neotropi-calLepidoptera,Checklist:Part1.Dr.W.JunkPublishers,TheHague,pp.25–27. Davis,D.R.,Robinson,G.S.,1998.TheTineoideaandGracillarioidea.In:Kristensen, N.P.(Ed.),Lepidoptera,MothsandButterflies,vol.1:Evolution,Systematicand Biogeography.HandbookofZoology,vol.4,Part35.DeGruyter,Berlin,pp. 91–117.
Davis,D.R.,Wagner,D.L.,2011.BiologyandsystematicsoftheNewWorld Phylloc-nistisZellerleafminersoftheavocadogenusPersea(Lepidoptera,Gracillariidae). ZooKeys97,39–73.
Davis,D.R.,Kassulke,R.C.,Harley,K.L.S.,Gillett,J.D.,1991.Systematics, morphol-ogy,biology,andhostspecificityofNeurostrotagunniella(Busck)(Lepidoptera: Gracillariidae),anagentforthebiologicalcontrolofMimosapigraL.Proc. Ento-mol.Soc.Wash.93,16–44.
De Prins, J., De Prins, W., 2016a. Global Taxonomic Database of Gracil-lariidae (Lepidoptera), World Wide Web electronic publication (http://www.gracillariidae.net)(accessedMarch,2016).
De Prins, J., De Prins, W., 2016b. Afromoths, online database of Afrotropi-cal moth species (Lepidoptera), World Wide Web electronic publication (http://www.afromoths.net)(accessedMarch,2016).
Diamond,J.M.,1985.Taxonomy:howmanyunknownspeciesareyettobe discov-ered?Nature315,538–539.
Drummond,A.J.,Ho,S.Y.,Phillips,M.J.,Rambaut,A.,2006.Relaxedphylogenetics anddatingwithconfidence.PLoSBiol4,e88.
Erwin,T.L.,1982.Tropicalforests:theirrichnessinColeopteraandotherarthropod species.Coleopt.Bull.36,74–75.
Etienne,R.S.,Haegeman,B.,2012.Aconceptualandstatisticalframeworkfor adap-tiveradiationswithakeyrolefordiversitydependence.Am.Nat.180,E75–E89. Freitas,A.V.L.,Mielke,O.H.H.,Moser,A.,Silva-Brandão,K.L.,Iserhard,C.A.,2011.A newgenusandspeciesofEuptychiina(Lepidoptera:Nymphalidae:Satyrinae) fromSouthernBrazil.Neotrop.Entomol.40,231–237.
Gernhard,T.,2008.Theconditionedreconstructedprocess.J.Theoret.Biol.253, 769–778.
Guillén,M.,Davis, D.R.,Heraty, J.M.,2001.Systematics andbiologyofanew, polyphagousspeciesofMarmara(Lepidoptera:Gracillariidae)infesting grape-fruitintheSouthwesternUnitedStates.Proc.Entomol.Soc.Wash.103,636–654. Hanson,P.,Nishida,K.,Gómez-Laurito,J.,2014.InsectgallofCostaRicaandtheir parasitoids.In:Fernandes,G.W.,Santos,J.C.(Eds.),NeotropicalInsectGalls. Springer,NewYork,pp.497–518.
Hebert,P.D.N.,Cywinska,A.,Ball,S.L.,deWaard,J.R.,2003.Biologicalidentifications throughDNAbarcodes.Proc.R.Soc.B270,313–321.
Hu,B.,Wang, S.,Zhang,J.,Li,H., 2011. Taxonomyand biologyoftwo seed-parasiticgracillariidmoths(Lepidoptera,Gracillariidae),withdescriptionofa newspecies.Zookeys83,43–56.
Jahnke,S.M.,Redaelli,L.R.,Diefenbach,L.M.G.,2005.Complexodeparasitóidesde Phyllocnistiscitrella(Lepidoptera,Gracillariidae)emdoispomaresdecitrosem Montenegro,RS,Brasil.IheringiaSer.Zool.95,359–363.
Janzen,D.H.,Hajibabaei,M.,Burns,J.M.,Hallwacs,W.,Remigio,E.,Hebert,P.D.N., 2005.WeddingbiodiversityofalargeandcomplexLepidopterafaunawithDNA barcoding.Phil.Trans.R.Soc.B360,1835–1846.
Kawahara,A.Y.,Ohshima,I.,Kawakita,A.,Regier,J.C.,Mitter,C.,Cummings,M.P., Davis,D.R.,Wagner,D.L.,DePrins,J.,Lopez-Vaamonde,C.,2011.Increasedgene
samplingstrengthenssupportforhigher-levelgroupswithinleaf-miningmoths andrelatives(Lepidoptera:Gracillariidae).BMCEvol.Biol.11,182.
Kawakita,A.,Kato,M.,2006.Assessmentofthediversityandspeciesdiversityofthe mutualisticassociationbetweenEpicephalamothsandGlochidiontrees.Mol. Ecol.15,3567–3581.
Kawakita,A.,Kato,M.,2016.RevisionoftheJapanesespeciesofEpicephalaMeyrick withdescriptionsofsevennewspecies(Lepidoptera,Gracillariidae).Zookeys 568,87–118.
Kawakita,A.,Takimura,A.,Terachi,T.,Sota,T.,Kato,M.,2004.Coespeciationanalysis ofanobligatepollinationmutualism:haveGlochidiontrees(Euphobiaceae)and pollinatingEpicephalamoths(Gracillariidae)diversifiedinparallel?Evolution 58,2201–2214.
Kumata,T.,1978.Anewstem-minerofalderinJapanwithareviewofthe lar-valtransformationintheGracillariidae(Lepidoptera).InsectaMatsumurana13, 1–27.
Kumata,T.,1998.JapanesespeciesofthesubfamilyOecophyllembiinaeRéalet Bal-achowsky(Lepidoptera:Gracillariidae),withdescriptionsofanewgenusand eightnewspecies.InsectaMatsumurana54,77–131.
Kuznetzov,V.I.,Baryshnikova,S.V.,2001.ReviewofPalaearcticgeneraof gracil-lariidmoths(Lepidoptera,Gracillariidae),withdescriptionofanewsubfamily OrnixolinaeKuznetzovetBrushnikova,subfam.n.Entomol.Oboz.80,96–120. Kuznetzov,V.I.,Stekolnikov,A.A.,1987.Functionalmorphologyofthemalegenitalia
andnotesontheclassificationandphylogeneticrelationshipsofminingmoths ofsuperfamilyGracillarioidea(Lepidoptera).Entomol.Oboz.66,52–65. Lawton,J.H.,Bignell,D.E.,Bolton,B.,Bloemers,G.F.,Eggleton,P.,Hammond,P.M.,
Hodda,M.,Holt,R.D.,Larsen,B.T.,Mawdsley,N.A.,Stork,N.E.,Srivastava,D.S., Watt,A.D.,1998.Biodiversityinventories,indicatortaxaandeffectsofhabitat modificationintropicalforest.Nature391,72–76.
Lees,D.C.,Kawahara,A.Y.,Rougerie,R.,Ohshima,I.,Kawakita,A.,Bouteleux,O.,De Prins,J.,Lopez-Vaamonde,C.,2014.DNAbarcodingrevealsalargelyunknown faunaofGracillariidaeleaf-miningmothsintheNeotropics.Mol.Ecol.Resour. 14,286–296.
Lewinsohn, T.M., Freitas, A.V.L., Prado, P.I., 2005. Conservation of terrestrial invertebratesandtheirhabitatsinBrazil.Conserv.Biol.19,640–645. Linares,M.C.,Soto-Calderón,I.D.,Lees,D.C.,Anthony,N.M.,2009.Highmitochondrial
diversityingeographicallywidespreadbutterfliesofMadagascar:atestofthe DNAbarcodingapproach.Mol.Phylogenet.Evol.50,485–495.
Lipscomb,D.,Platnick,N.,Wheeler,Q.D.,2003.Theintellectualcontentoftaxonomy: acommentonDNAtaxonomy.TrendsEcol.Evol.18,65–66.
Löwenberg-Neto,P.,2014.Neotropicalregion:ashapefileofMorrone’s biogeo-graphicalregionalization.Zootaxa3802,300.
Maita-Maita,J.,Huanca-Mamani,W.,Vargas,H.A.,2015.Firstremarksongenetic variationofthelittleknownleafminerAngelabellatecomaeVargas&Parra (Gracillariidae)intheAtacamadesertofNorthernChile.J. Lepid.Soc.69, 192–196.
McKay,F.,Oleiro,M.,Vitorino,M.D.,Wheeler,G.,2012.TheleafminingLeurocephala schinusae(Lepidoptera:Gracillariidae):notsuitableforthebiologicalcontrolof Schinusterebinthifolius(Sapindales:Anacardiaceae)incontinentalUSA. Biocon-trolSci.Technol.22,477–489.
Morlon,H.,2014.Phylogeneticapproachesforstudyingdiversification.Ecol.Lett. 17,508–525.
Morrone, J.J., 2014. Biogeographical regionalizationof theNeotropical region. Zootaxa3782,1–100.
Mundaca,E.A.,Parra,L.E.,Vargas,H.A.,2013.Anewgenusandspeciesofleafminer (Lepidoptera,Gracillariidae)forChileassociatedtothenativetreeLithraea caus-tica.Rev.Bras.Entomol.57,157–164.
Myers,N.,Mittermeier,R.A.,Mittermeier,C.G.,Fonseca,G.A.B.,Kent,J.,2000. Biodi-versityhotspotsforconservationpriorities.Nature403,853–858.
Nee,S.,May,R.M.,Harvey,P.H.,1994.Thereconstructedevolutionaryprocess.Phil Trans.R.Soc.Lond.B344,305–311.
vanNieukerken,E.J.,Kaila,L.,Kitching,I.J.,Kristensen,N.P.,Lees,D.C.,Minet,J., Mit-ter,C.,Mutanen,M.,Regier,J.C.,Simonsen,T.J.,Wahlberg,N.,Yen,S.-H.,Zahiri, R.,Adamski,D.,Baixeras,J.,Bartsch,D.,Bengtsson,B.Å.,Brown,J.W.,Bucheli,S.R., Davis,D.R.,DePrins,J.,DePrins,W.,Epstein,M.E.,Gentili-Poole,P.,Gielis,C., Hät-tenschwiler,P.,Hausmann,A.,Holloway,J.D.,Kallies,A.,Karsholt,O.,Kawahara, A.Y.,Koster,S.(J.C.),Kozlov,M.V.,Lafontaine,J.D.,Lamas,G.,Landry,J.-F.,Lee,S., Nuss,M.,Park,K.-T.,Penz,C.,Rota,J.,Schintlmeister,A.,Schmidt,B.C.,Sohn,J.-C., Solis,M.A.,Tarmann,G.M.,Warren,A.D.,Weller,S.,Yakovle,R.V.,Zolotuhin,V.V., Zwick,A.,2011.OrderLepidopteraLinnaeus,1758.In:Zhang,Z.-Q.(Ed.),Animal biodiversity:anoutlineofhigher-levelclassificationandsurveyoftaxonomic richness.Zootaxa3148,212–221.
Ohshima,I.,2008.Hostraceformationintheleaf-miningmothAcrocercopstransecta (LepidopteraGracillariidae).Biol.J.LinneanSoc.93,135–145.
Ohshima,I.,Yoshizawa,K.,2006.Multiplehostshiftsbetweendistantlyrelated plants,JuglandaceaeandEricaceae,intheleaf-miningmothAcrocercops leu-cophaea complex (Lepidoptera: Gracillariidae). Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 38, 231–240.
Phillimore,A.B.,Price,T.D.,2008.Density-dependentcladogenesisinbirds.PLoSBiol. 6,e71.
Rabosky,D.L.,Lovette,I.J.,2008.Explosiveevolutionaryradiations:decreasing spe-ciationorincreasingextinctionthroughtime?Evolution62,1866–1875. Rambaut,A.,Suchard,M.A.,Xie,D.,Drummond,A.J.,2014.Tracerv1.6,Available
fromhttp://beast.bio.ed.ac.uk/Tracer.
Ratkowsky,D.A.,1990.HandbookofNonlinearRegressionModels.MarcelDekker, NewYork,pp.241.
Réal,P.,Balachowsky,A.S.,1966.FamilledesGracillariidae(=Lithocolletidae).In: Bal-achowsky,A.S.(Ed.),Entomologieappliquéàl ´agriculture.Tome2.Lépidoptères. MassonetCieéditeurs,Paris,pp.309–335.
Ricklefs,R.E.,2007.Estimatingdiversificationratesfromphylogeneticinformation. TrendsEcol.Evol.22,601–610.
Santos,E.C.,Mielke,O.H.H.,Casagrande,M.M.,2008a.Inventáriosdeborboletasno Brasil:estadodaarteemodelodeáreasprioritáriasparapesquisacomvistasà conservac¸ão.Nat.Conserv.6,68–90.
Santos,J.P.,Redaelli,L.R., Dal Soglio,F.K., 2008b. Plantashospedeiras de lep-idópterosminadoresempomardecitrosemMontenegro-RS.Rev.Bras.Frutic. 30,255–258.
Scotland,R.,Hughes,C.,Bailey,D.,Wortley,A.,2003.TheBigMachineandthe much-malignedtaxonomist.Syst.Biodivers.1,139–143.
Stainton,H.T.,1854.Lepidoptera:Tineina.InsectaBritannica,vol.3.LovellReeve, London,pp.193.
Stemann,J.R.,Forzza,R.C.,Salino,A.,Sobral,M.,Costa,D.P.,Kamino,L.H.Y.,2009. PlantasdaFlorestaAtlântica.InstitutodePesquisasJardimBotânicodoRiode Janeiro,RiodeJaneiro.
Storey-Palma, J., Benítez, H., Parra, L.E., Vargas, H.A., 2012. Identification of sap-feederinstarsinAngelabellatecomaeVargas&Parra(Lepidoptera, Gracil-lariidae)feedingonTecomafulvafulva(Bignoniaceae).Rev.Bras.Entomol.56, 508–510.
Storey-Palma,J.,Benítez,H.,Mundaca,E.A.,Vargas,H.A.,2014.Egglayingsite selec-tionbyahostplantspecialistleafminermothattwointra-plantlevelsinthe northernChileanAtacamaDesert.Rev.Bras.Entomol.58,280–284.
Tamura,K.,Stecher,G.,Peterson,D.,Filipski,A.,Kumar,S.,2013.MEGA6:Molecular EvolutionaryGeneticsAnalysisversion6.0.Mol.Biol.Evol.30,2725–2729. Vargas,H.A.,Bobalilla,D.E.,Jiménez,M.R.,Vargas,H.E.,1998.Algunas
characterísti-casbiológicasdelminadorfoliardeloscítricos,Phyllocnistiscitrella(Lepidoptera: Gracillariidae:Phyllocnistinae)observadasenelValledeAzapa,IRegión,Chile. Idesia14,65–75.
Vargas,H.A.,Landry,B.,2005.AnewgenusandspeciesofGracillariidae (Lepi-doptera)feedingonflowersofAcaciamacracanthaWilld.(Mimosaceae)inChile. ActaEnt.Chilena29,47–57.
Vargas,H.A.,Parra,L.E.,2005.Unnuevogêneroyumanovaespéciede Oecophyllem-biinae(Lepidoptera:Gracillariidae)deChile.Neotrop.Entomol.34,227–233. Vári,L.,1961.SouthAfricanLepidoptera.VolumeI.Lithocolletidae.Trans.Mus.Mem.
12,1–238.
Wagner,D.L.,Loose,J.L.,Fitzgerald,T.D.,Benedictis,J.A.,Davis,D.R.,2000.Ahidden past:thehypermetamorphicdevelopmentofMarmaraarbutiella(Lepidoptera: Gracillariidae).Ann.Entomol.Soc.Am.93,59–64.
Wahlberg, N.,Wheat,C.W., Pe ˜na,C.,2013.Timing andPatterns inthe Taxo-nomicDiversificationofLepidoptera(ButterfliesandMoths).PLoSONE8(11), e80875.
Wheeler,Q.D.,2004.Taxonomictriageandthepovertyofphylogeny.Philos.Trans. R.Soc.Lond.B359,571–583.
Zenker,M.M.,Rougerie, R.,Teston,J.A.,Laguerre, M.,Pie, M.R., Freitas,A.V.L., 2016. Fast census ofmoth diversity in the Neotropics: a comparisonof field-assignedmorphospeciesandDNAbarcodinginTigermoths.PLoSONE, http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0148423.
Zhang,J.,Wang,S.,Li,H.,Hu,B.,Yang,X.,Wang,Z.,2012.Diffusecoevolutionbetween twoEpicephalaspecies(Gracillariidae)andtwoBreyniaspecies(Phyllanthaceae). PLoSONE7,e41657.
Zuloaga,F.O.,Belgrano,M.J.,2015.ThecatalogueofvascularplantsoftheSouther ConeandthefloraofArgentina:theircontributiontotheworldflora.Rodriguesia 66,989–1024.