revbrashematolhemoter.2017;39(1):1–3
w w w . r b h h . o r g
Revista
Brasileira
de
Hematologia
e
Hemoterapia
Brazilian
Journal
of
Hematology
and
Hemotherapy
Editorial
Paradoxes
of
hematology:
When
the
old
disappears
and
the
new
does
not
arrive
Angelo
Maiolino
a,b,
Belinda
Pinto
Simões
c,d,∗,
Claudio
Galvão
de
Castro
Junior
e,f,
Dimas
Tadeu
Covas
g,
Gustavo
dos
Santos
Fernandes
h,
Nelson
Hamerschlak
i,j,k,
Teresa
Cristina
Cardoso
Fonseca
e,
Vergilio
Colturato
caAssociac¸ãoBrasileiradeHematologia,HemoterapiaeTerapiaCelular(ABHH),ComitêdeMielomaMúltiplo,Brazil
bInternationalMyelomaFoundation-LatinAmerica(IMF),Brazil
cSociedadeBrasileiradeTransplantedeMedulaÓssea(SBTMO),Brazil
dLatinAmericanBoneMarrowTransplantAssociation(LABMT),Brazil
eSociedadeBrasileiradeOncologiaPediátrica(SOBOPE),Brazil
fSantaCasadePortoAlegre,UnidadedeHematologia/OncologiaPediátrica,PortoAlegre,RS,Brazil
gAssociac¸ãoBrasileiradeHematologia,HemoterapiaeTerapiaCelular(ABHH),Brazil
hSociedadeBrasileiradeOncologiaClínica(SBOC),Brazil
iUniversidadedeSãoPaulo(USP),FaculdadedeMedicina,SãoPaulo,SP,Brazil
jHospitalIsraelitaAlbertEinstein,ProgramadeHematologiaeTransplantedeMedulaÓssea,SãoPaulo,SP,Brazil
kAssociac¸ãoBrasileiradeLinfomaeLeucemia(ABRALE),Brazil
Over the last few decades, we have seen considerable progressincancertreatmentwithpatientssurvivingfor ever-increasingtimes. Animportantpartofthis progressisthe resultofnewdrugswithmechanismsofactiondistinctfrom classicchemotherapy, sometimesbased on disease control ratherthancure.However,despitethegreatadvances,many drugsdevelopedinthe60s,70sand80sareamongthe main-staysofthecurativetreatmentofleukemias,lymphomasand solidtumorsuntiltoday.1,2Evenhavingextremeimportance,
theseold,cheapdrugshavedisappearedfromthemarketin thelastdecade,prejudicingthetreatmentofmanypatients becausethereisnosubstituteforthem.Forusphysiciansand forpatientsthequestionremains:whydocheapbut essen-tialoldmedicinesdisappearwhilemodernandincreasingly expensivemedicinesappearinthemarketdaily?Theanswer
∗ Correspondingauthorat:UniversidadedeSãoPaulo,FaculdadedeMedicinadeRibeirãoPreto(FMRP.USP),AvBandeirantes3900,Monte
Alegre,14048-900RibeirãoPreto,SP,Brazil.
E-mailaddress:bpsimoes@gmail.com(B.P.Simões).
seemssimple:theolddrugsarecheapandthepharmaceutical industrynolongerhasanyinteresttoproducethem.
This, however, is only part of the answer. Thereasons arediverse,but notalwayseasytounderstand,as pharma-ceuticalcompaniesdonotrevealtheirproductionpoliciesor marketingstrategies.3–5Weknowthatthelegalandsanitary
requirements to produce medicines are always increasing. Thisisclearwhenwenoticethatinjectabledrugshave disap-pearedthemost.Withthenewrequirements,factoriesneed tomakeadjustmentsduringwhichproductionisinterrupted. Thelackofapatentoftenleadstoproductionbyalimited numberofcompanieswiththisnumberbeinginsufficientto supplytheinternationalmarket.Theestimateisthatatleast fourfactoriesofaparticulardrugare neededtoreducethe riskofadrugshortagetotheminimal.Withthedifferencein
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjhh.2017.01.001
2
revbrashematolhemoter.2 0 1 7;39(1):1–3pricebetweenreferenceandgenericmedications,the inter-estinproducingthesemedicineshasfallendrastically.Inrich countries, the‘renewal’ oftechnologyispartofthe strate-gicprocessofthepharmaceuticalindustrythatrecompenses thenationwithtaxes,jobsanddividendstoshareholders.3,4
Forus,peoplefrom low-andmiddle-incomecountries,the shortageofoldandeffectivedrugsisaseriousthreattothe healthsystemandtothechancesofcureforcancerpatients, especiallythosedependingonthepublicsystem.5–7
Thelackofmedicationsstartsasnowballthatfurther wors-ensthealreadycriticalsituation.Withthefearofabreakin thesupply,manyhospitalswillstockdrugsleavingother hos-pitalswithoutanystockwhatsoever.Thestrongestwins,in thiscasetherichest.Thepriceisyetanotherissue.Iftheyare cheap,duetothelawofsupplyanddemand,wepayahigher pricefordrugsthataremissingfromthemarket.
What does the law say? Current legislation is weak in respecttocurbingbothshortagesandhighprices.InBrazil, aswell asabroad,itisonlynecessarythatthe pharmaceu-ticallaboratorieswarnoneyearinadvancethattheywillno longermarketspecificdrugsandnothingelse.Thisisthelegal requirement.Isthatenoughtimeforlocalauthoritiesto orga-nizethemselves?Isthereanyotherwaytostopinterrupting thedeliveryofessential medications sincethe unavailabil-ityofthesedrugscanaffect thetreatmentofthousandsof patientsbysubstantiallylimitingtheirchancesofcure?Are theauthoritiessufficientlyawareabouthowtheshortageof thesemedicinesaffectspatientcare?
Thecurrentepisodewiththesuspensionoforaland intra-venousmelphalanandchlorambucilandthesituationrelated toasparaginaseareexamplesofsituationsthatshowusthat theBrazilianhealthauthoritiesarestillunawareofthe seri-ousnessoftheabsenceofthesedrugs.5,7 Itisessentialthat
thedelaybeforetakingactionismuchshorterthanwehave seenuntilnow.
Thereisalsonoplausibleexplanationfortheshortageof thalidomide,whichismanufacturedbyastatelaboratoryand usedtotreatmyeloma,myelodysplasiaandmyelofibrosisin theareaofhematologyinadditiontoitsroleinleprosy.
Ontheotherhand,wearenowexperiencinganotherdrama withtheadventofnewdrugsthatbreakparadigms,increase survival,decreasetoxicity,improvequalityoflifeand trans-formlethaldiseasesintochronicones.
Imatinib has revolutionized the treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML); we already have many patients treatedforalmost17yearswhodonotshowsignsofdisease.8
Evenin ourscenario,wewere not onlyabletotreat these patients, but alsoproducenumerousscientific articlesand participateinvariousprotocolsandstudies.9AfterImatinib
wehavealreadyreachedsecondandthirdgenerationtyrosine kinaseinhibitors.TheexampleofCMLisoneofthebestand mostinteresting.Withthebreakingofpatentsovertimeand negotiationsbetweentheMinistryofHealthandlaboratories withtheforcefulparticipationofhematologists,patientshave accesstomedicinesandtheirprogresscanbemonitoredwith molecularbiologytestsfollowingprotocolsrecommendedby severalinternationalgroups.10
Another drug that changed the treatment and survival ofpatientswithlymphoiddiseasesisrituximab.Thousands ofpatientsofallageswithBlymphomashadtheirdisease
cured,ortheirsurvivalsignificantlyincreasedwiththisdrug developed about 20 years ago. Patients with chronic lym-phocyticleukemia(CLL),adiseasestillconsideredincurable, havegainedyearsofsurvivalwiththisnewmedication.More recently,obinutuzumabandibrutinibhavebeenaddedtothe drugarsenal,butunlikethehistoryofCML,CLL,eventhough itisaleukemiaandchronicdisease,isanexampleof inconsis-tencybothinourregulatorysystemandinourpublichealth system.Whiletreatmentcontinuestoadvance,inthe Brazil-ianpublichealthservice,namedtheSistemaÚnicodeSaúde
(SUS),patientsaretiedtotreatmentsusedforalmost60years, suchas chlorambuciland atmosttheyreceive fludarabine andcyclophosphamide,butwithoutanimportantdrug, ritux-imab.Thisisjustoneexampledemonstratingthat,depending onthesocialclassandtheaccesstoagoodhealthcareplan, patientsmayormaynotenjoyagreaterchanceofanadequate responsetotreatment.Acontradiction,inacountrythathas definedthatallcitizens havethe righttohealthinits con-stitution.Lookingatregulatoryandmarketaspects,wewere strugglingtoincludeanoldbutefficientdrug,bendamustine, intheBrazilianmarket;thisfinallyseemstohavehappened in2017.ThisisacheapdrugusedinthetreatmentofCLLthat couldimprovethelivesofthousandsofSUSpatientsandthose insuredbyhealthcareproviders.
Anotherparadoxexistsinthecaseofmultiplemyeloma. Bortezomib,usedasfirstlinetreatmentthroughouttheworld, isnotaccessiblethroughtheSUS.Thegreatestironyliesin thefactthatinDecreenumber708ofAugust6,2015issuedby theBrazilianHealthMinistryitself,bortezomibappearsasthe first-line drugtotreatpatientswithmultiplemyeloma,but without reimbursementforitsuse.11 Carfilzomibisalready
approvedanddaratumomab,amonoclonalantibody,should beapprovedsoon.Noneofthesewillbemadeavailabletothe SUSand,giventhehighcostofthesemedications;evenhealth insuranceplanswillhavedifficultiestopayforthetreatment. LenalidomidehasbeenontheshelfoftheBrazilianregulatory board,theAgênciaNacionaldeVigilânciaSanitária(ANVISA),for eightyearsand indevelopedcountries, morepotentdrugs, suchaspomalidomide,arealreadyareality.
As doctors we live a very serious situation, with irreplaceabledrugsdisappearingfromthemarketandarange ofnewefficientbutexpensivedrugsappearing.Wehaveno hopethattheBrazilianpublichealthsystemwillprovidethe newdrugstoSUSpatientsintheshortormediumterm.Itis theworstoftheworlds,treatmenthasbecomevery expen-sive becauseofthe newdrugs, but patientswillsuffer the consequencesintermsofsurvivalbecausetheolddrugsare missing.Eveninthemostmodernprotocols,thereisno rec-ommendationtosubstituteeffectivedrugs,suchasmelphalan andL-asparaginaseforothernewercompounds.
revbrashematolhemoter.2 0 1 7;39(1):1–3
3
Wecan no longer avoidor postponethe discussion on thisseriousproblem!Wehavetoguaranteeaccessof Brazil-iancitizenstominimally adequatetreatmentsinafairand transparentprocesswithinpossiblecostrestraints.
Conflict
of
interest
Theauthorsdeclarenoconflictsofinterest.
r
e
f
e
r
e
n
c
e
s
1. CliffordP,CliftRA,GillmorJH.Oralmelphalantherapyin advancedmalignantdisease.BrJCancer.1963;17:381–90.
2. HillJM,RobertsJ,LoebE,KhanA,MacLellanA,HillRW. L-asparaginasetherapyforleukemiaandothermalignant neoplasms.Remissioninhumanleukemia.JAMA. 1967;202(9):882–8.
3. ParsonsHM,SchmidtS,KarnadAB,LiangY,PughMJ,FoxER. Associationbetweenthenumberofsuppliersforcritical antineoplasticsanddrugshortages:implicationsforfuture drugshortagesandtreatment.JOncolPract.2016;12(3): e289–98.
4. FoxER,SweetBV,JensenV.Drugshortages:acomplexhealth carecrisis.MayoClinProc.2014;89(3):361–73.
5.CastroCGJr.Velhosmedicamentos,novosproblemas.Jornal FolhadeSãoPaulo.2013,28FebOpinião–p.A3.
6.SimõesBP,CastroCGJr,HamerschlakN.Tratamentos adequadoseprec¸osjustos.JornalFolhadeSãoPaulo.2016,13 dec–Opiniãop.A5.
7.SimõesBP,CastroCGJr,HamerschlakN:.Velhos
medicamentos,velhosproblemas.JornalCorreioBraziliense. 2016,25octOpinião–p.11.
8.MaschanA,NovichkovaG,MiakovaN,PersiantsevaM.Very longsurvivalincompletecytogeneticremissioninan adolescentwithlymphoidblastcrisisofchronicmyeloid leukemiaaftertreatmentwithintensiveALL-directed chemotherapycombinedwithcontinuousimatinib.Pediatr BloodCancer.2016;63(12):2243–5.
9.CortesJ,DeSouzaC,Ayala-SanchezM,BenditI,Best-Aguilera C,EnricoA,etal.Currentpatientmanagementofchronic myeloidleukemiainLatinAmerica:astudybytheLatin AmericanLeukemiaNet(LALNET).Cancer.
2010;116(21):4991–5000.
10.Expertsinchronicmyeloidleukemia.Thepriceofdrugsfor chronicmyeloidleukemia(CML)isareflectionofthe unsustainablepricesofcancerdrugs:fromtheperspectiveof alargegroupofCMLexperts.Blood.2013;121(22):4439–42.
11.Brasil,MinistériodaSaúde,PortariaSAS/MS708de6de agostode2015.(citedJan10th2017)Availablefrom: