Heating Foods
Heating Foods
Integrating Quality and Safety in Thermal
Integrating Quality and Safety in Thermal
Processes
Processes
Mafalda Quintas, Teresa Brandão(*) & Cristina L.M. Silva
CBQF – Centro de Biotecnologia e Química Fina School of Biotechnology
Catholic University of Portugal
Harmonization of Standards in Thermal Processing
October 27-29, 2009 Porto, Portugal
… Originally designed to inactivate
spoiling and pathogenic microorganisms
and
enzymes
bacteria
yeasts
molds
prevent the degradation of the original organoleptic and
nutritive food characteristics
quality quality
safety safety
thermal processes affect negatively quality factors
process design
quality quality safety safety Texture Microstructure Colour Vitamin C … Pathogenic bacteria Chemical contaminants …response
= mathematical function (
variables
y
= f (
x
,
+
q
) + e
parameters
) + experimental error
Safety
Quality
y
= f (
x
,
q
) + e
Safety
Quality
process time kinetic parameters
The extension and rate of production /degradation of any safety and quality characteristic can be
quantified
… as well as the effect of process conditions on the kinetic parameters and consequently on final responses
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 0 500 1000 1500 2000 logN K maximum inactivation rate logN0 logNres L lag Time (s)
microbial thermal inactivation in which the kinetic parameters
of the model assumed are directly related to specific
features …
L t 1 N N log e k exp exp N N log logN logN res 0 res 0 0 Gompertz-inspired model Safety N – microbial counts kinetic parameters tail0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 time (s) lo g N T=52 ºC T=56 ºC T=60 ºC Safety
Casadei et al. (1998) 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 50 100 150 200 250 time (s) lo g N T=64 ºC T=68 ºC T=60 ºC Safety
0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 320 325 330 335 340 345 L ( s ) Temperature (K) 0,00 0,05 0,10 0,15 0,20 0,25 320 325 330 335 340 345 k ( 1 /s ) Temperature (K)
k
= 0.0216 exp(-203.3/R*(1/T
-1/333.15))L = 116.3exp(344.1/R*(1/
T
-1/333.15))an Arrhenius expression
L t 1 N N log e k exp exp N N log logN logN res 0 res 0 0 Safetyk
= 0.0216 exp(-203.3/R*(1/T
-1/333.15))L = 116.3exp(344.1/R*(1/
T
-1/333.15))The microbial load is just a function of the process temperature, which is a valuable tool to design efficient and controlled processes from a safety point of view.
Processes
Chemical Physical Food Processes Transport Phenomena • heat • mass • momentum Reaction kinetics PropertiesProcesses
Chemical Physical Food Processes Transport Phenomena • heat • mass • momentum Reaction kinetics Properties mathematical function variables parameters regression schemes experimental designProcesses
Chemical Physical Food Processes Transport Phenomena • heat • mass • momentum Reaction kinetics Properties design Criterium mathematical function variables parameters regression schemesProcesses
Chemical Physical Food Processes Transport Phenomena • heat • mass • momentum Reaction kinetics Properties design Criterium validation mathematical function variables parameters regression schemes experimental designProcesses
Chemical Physical Food Processes Transport Phenomena • heat • mass • momentum Reaction kinetics Properties design Criterium validation control mathematical function variables parameters regression schemesProcesses
Chemical Physical Food Processes Transport Phenomena • heat • mass • momentum Reaction kinetics Properties mathematical function variables parameters regression schemes experimental design design Criterium validation control optimization ObjectivesProcesses
Chemical Physical Food Processes Transport Phenomena • heat • mass • momentum Reaction kinetics Properties design Criterium validation control optimization Objectives quality quality safety safety mathematical function variables parameters regression schemes1.
1. Heat
Heat Processing
Processing –
– effect
effect on
on food
food quality
quality and
and safety
safety
2.
2. Combining
Combining Heat
Heat and
and other
other Non
Non--Thermal
Thermal Technologies
Technologies to
to
preserve
preserve foods
foods
3
3..New
New Approaches
Approaches on
on Understanding
Understanding Heat
Heat Degradation
Degradation in
in
Foods
1.
1. Heat
Heat Processing
Processing –
– effect
effect on
on food
food quality
quality and
and safety
safety
2.
2. Combining
Combining Heat
Heat and
and other
other Non
Non--Thermal
Thermal Technologies
Technologies to
to
preserve
preserve foods
foods
3
3..New
New Approaches
Approaches on
on Understanding
Understanding Heat
Heat Degradation
Degradation in
in
Foods
In spite of the benefits of blanching such as prolonging storage
life by the inactivation of enzymes responsible for quality
degradation and reducing the number of bacteria and other
contaminants, it also leads to excessive loss of weight,
alterations in colour, softening of the tissue and loss of nutrients
through their diffusion into the water
Blanching
… particularly important in
VEGETABLES
pumpkin
broccoli
carrots
Blanching
Cucurbita maxima L. Brassica oleracea L.
Quality
Quality
pumpkin
Cucurbita maxima L. Colour changesFirmness
Peroxidase
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 0 10 20 30 40 50 Time (min) T C D *
Quality
pumpkin
Cucurbita maxima L. Colour changesFirmness
Peroxidase
T=95 ºC T=75 ºC0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 0 10 20 30 40 50 Time (min) T C D *
Quality
pumpkin
Cucurbita maxima L. Colour changesFirmness
Peroxidase
T=95 ºC T=75 ºCkt eq 0 eq e TCD -TCD TCD -TCD Fractional conversion model
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 0 10 20 30 40 50 Time (min) T C D * 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 0 10 20 30 40 50 Time (min) F ir m n e ss ( N )
Quality
pumpkin
Cucurbita maxima L. Colour changesFirmness
Peroxidase
T=95 ºC T=75 ºC T=95 ºC T=75 ºCTexture Analyser (Stable Micro-System Ltd, Godalming, UK)
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 0 10 20 30 40 50 Time (min) T C D * 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 0 10 20 30 40 50 Time (min) F ir m n e ss ( N )
Quality
pumpkin
Cucurbita maxima L. Colour changesPeroxidase
T=95 ºC T=75 ºC T=95 ºC T=75 ºC kt eq 0 eq e Firmness -Firmness Firmness -Firmness Fractional conversion model
Firmness
1. Heat Processing
1. Heat Processing –– effect on food quality and safety effect on food quality and safety
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 0 10 20 30 40 50 Time (min) T C D * 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 0 10 20 30 40 50 Time (min) F ir m n e ss ( N )
Quality
pumpkin
Cucurbita maxima L. 0 20 40 60 80 100 0 10 20 30 40 50 Time (min) P/ P 0 x 1 0 0 Colour changesFirmness
Peroxidase
T=95 ºC T=95 ºC T=75 ºC T=95 ºC T=75 ºC T=80 ºC0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 0 10 20 30 40 50 Time (min) T C D * 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 0 10 20 30 40 50 Time (min) F ir m n e ss ( N )
Quality
pumpkin
Cucurbita maxima L. 0 20 40 60 80 100 0 10 20 30 40 50 Time (min) P/ P 0 x 1 0 0 Colour changesFirmness
T=95 ºC T=95 ºC T=75 ºC T=95 ºC T=75 ºC T=80 ºC kt e P P 0First order kinetics
Peroxidase
pumpkin
Cucurbita maxima L.
… are recommended to decrease 90% of peroxidase activity, ensuring a good retention of colour. Unavoidably, texture is greatly affected (~ 14% was retained).
Modelling
the kinetics of
peroxidase
inactivation and
colour
and
texture
changes of pumpkin during blanching, will
allow convenient design of thermal processes
Stabilisation of enzymatic deterioration Minimisation of quality losses
Blanching conditions
5.8 min at 90 ºC andbroccoli
Brassica oleracea L.
Quality
Peroxidase
0 0,2 0,4 0,6 0,8 1 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 Time (min) P O D a c ti . ( P /P 0 ) 70 ºC 75 ºC 80 ºC
85 ºC 90 ºC Global mod. fit
broccoli
Brassica oleracea L.Peroxidase
Phenolic contentTexture
Quality
0 0,2 0,4 0,6 0,8 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 Time (min) P O D a ct i. (P /P 0 ) 70 ºC 75 ºC 80 ºC 85 ºC 90 ºC Global mod. fit
broccoli
Brassica oleracea L. Phenolic contentQuality
kt e P P 0First order kinetics
Peroxidase
0 0,2 0,4 0,6 0,8 1 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 Time (min) P O D a c ti . ( P /P 0 ) 70 ºC 75 ºC 80 ºC
85 ºC 90 ºC Global mod. fit
broccoli
Brassica oleracea L.Peroxidase
0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 Time (min) M a x . sh e a r fo rc e ( N )70 75 80 85 90 Global mod. fit
Phenolic content
Texture
Quality
Texture Analyser (Stable Micro-System Ltd, Godalming, UK)
0 0,2 0,4 0,6 0,8 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 Time (min) P O D a c ti . ( P /P 0 ) 70 ºC 75 ºC 80 ºC
85 ºC 90 ºC Global mod. fit
broccoli
Brassica oleracea L.Peroxidase
0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 Time (min) M a x . sh e a r fo rc e ( N )70 75 80 85 90 Global mod. fit
Phenolic content
Quality
Maxshearforce
kt forceshear
Max 0
Zero order kinetics
0 0,2 0,4 0,6 0,8 1 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 Time (min) P O D a c ti . ( P /P 0 ) 70 ºC 75 ºC 80 ºC
85 ºC 90 ºC Global mod. fit
broccoli
Brassica oleracea L.Peroxidase
15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 Time (min) T o ta l P h e n o lic ( m G A E / 1 0 0 g ) 70 75 80 85 90 Global mod.fit 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 Time (min) M a x . sh e a r fo rc e ( N )70 75 80 85 90 Global mod. fit
Texture
Quality
Phenolic content
Spectrophotometry (Unicom Ltd, Cambridge, UK)
0 0,2 0,4 0,6 0,8 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 Time (min) P O D a c ti . ( P /P 0 ) 70 ºC 75 ºC 80 ºC
85 ºC 90 ºC Global mod. fit
broccoli
Brassica oleracea L.Peroxidase
15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 Time (min) T o ta l P h e n o lic ( m G A E / 1 0 0 g ) 70 75 80 85 90 Global mod.fit 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 Time (min) M a x . sh e a r fo rc e ( N )70 75 80 85 90 Global mod. fit
Quality
kt
e P
P 0
First order kinetics Phenolic content
broccoli
Brassica oleracea L.
Modelling
the kinetics of
peroxidase
inactivation and
phenolic content
and
texture
changes of broccoli during
blanching, will allow convenient design of thermal processes
… are recommended to decrease 90% of peroxidase activity.
Texture was the most temperature sensitive parameter. Thus, attention should be given to texture against other quality parameters for optimizing thermal processes of broccoli.
Stabilisation of enzymatic deterioration Minimisation of quality losses
Blanching conditions
6.5 min at 70 ºC andDaucus carota L.
Peroxidase
Phenolic contentFirmness
Quality Colourcarrots
Daucus carota L. 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 Time (min) 0 20 40 60 80 100 T o ta l p h en o li c co n te n t (% ) 70 ºC 75 ºC 80 ºC 85 ºC 90 ºC ___ Global mod. fit7 0 º C 7 5 º C 8 0 º C 8 5 º C 9 0 º C __ _ mo d . fit 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 Time (min) 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 F ir m n es s (N ) 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 Time (min) 0,0 0,2 0,4 0,6 0,8 1,0 P er o x id as e ac ti v it y ( A/ A0 ) 70 ºC 75 ºC 80 ºC 85 ºC 90 ºC ___ Global mod. fit
7 0 ºC 7 5 ºC 8 0 ºC 8 5 ºC 9 0 ºC _ __ Glo bal mo d . fit
0 5 1 0 15 20 2 5 30 35 4 0 45 Time (min) 6 8 1 0 1 2 1 4 1 6 1 8 2 0 2 2 2 4 a* v al u es
Peroxidase
Phenolic contentFirmness
Quality ColourDaucus carota L. 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 Time (min) 0 20 40 60 80 100 T o ta l p h en o li c co n te n t (% ) 70 ºC 75 ºC 80 ºC 85 ºC 90 ºC ___ Global mod. fit
7 0 º C 7 5 º C 8 0 º C 8 5 º C 9 0 º C __ _ mo d . fit 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 Time (min) 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 F ir m n es s (N ) 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 Time (min) 0,0 0,2 0,4 0,6 0,8 P er o x id as e ac ti v it y ( A/ A0 ) 75 ºC 80 ºC 85 ºC 90 ºC ___ Global mod. fit
7 0 ºC 7 5 ºC 8 0 ºC 8 5 ºC 9 0 ºC _ __ Glo bal mo d . fit
0 5 1 0 15 20 2 5 30 35 4 0 45 Time (min) 6 8 1 0 1 2 1 4 1 6 1 8 2 0 2 2 2 4 a* v al u es kt eq 0 eq e C -C C -C
Fractional conversion model Colour kt e P P 0
First order kinetics
Peroxidase
kt eq 0 eq e Firmness -Firmness Firmness -Firmness Fractional conversion model
Firmness
First order kinetics Phenolic content Quality kt e P P 0 k(T) Arrhenius k(T) Arrhenius k(T) Arrhenius k(T) Arrhenius
carrots
Daucus carota L.
Modelling
the kinetics of
peroxidase
inactivation and
phenolic content
,
colour
and
texture
changes of carrots
during blanching, will allow convenient design of thermal
processes
… is recommended to decrease 90% of peroxidase activity, ensuring a good retention of phenolic content (70%). Colour was the most temperature sensitive parameter. Thus, attention should be given to colour against other quality parameters for optimizing thermal processes of carrots.
Stabilisation of enzymatic deterioration Minimisation of quality losses
red bell pepper
Blanching
Capsicum annuum, L.
Petroselinum crispum
-2,5 -2,0 -1,5 -1,0 -0,5 0,0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
red bell pepper
Capsicum annuum, L.
total mesophiles
time (min)
Initial counts: N0~ 107 CFU/mg
log(N/N0)
T = 70 ºC
autoctone flora
-2,5 -2,0 -1,5 -1,0 -0,5 0,0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
red bell pepper
Capsicum annuum, L.
total mesophiles
time (min)
Initial counts: N0~ 107 CFU/mg
log(N/N0) T = 70 ºC autoctone flora 1 t L N N log e k exp exp N N log N N log 0 res 0 res 0 Gompertz-inspired model PCA
parsley
Petroselinum crispum
Listeria innocua
time (min)
Initial counts: N0~ 107 CFU/mg
artificially innoculated
parsley
Petroselinum crispum
Listeria innocua
time (min)
Initial counts: N0~ 107 CFU/mg
artificially innoculated L(T) t' dt' N N log e ) T ( k exp exp ' t ) T ( L N N log e ) T ( k exp e ) T ( k N N log t res res isot non 0 0 0 0 1 1 Gompertz-inspired model Palcam Agar
results obtained in broth
can be applied
in predicting microbial responses in
solid foods ?
However …
Modelling
the
kinetics
of
microbial
inactivation
including the effect of relevant variables (temperature,
pH
and
water activity
) will allow convenient design of thermal
processes
-6 -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 lo g (N /N 0 ) tempo (min) -6 -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 0,0 0,1 0,2 0,3 0,4 0,5 0,6 0,7 0,8 0,9 1,0 lo g (N /N 0 ) tempo (min) -6 -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 lo g (N /N 0 ) tempo (min) -6 -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 0,0 0,5 1,0 1,5 2,0 2,5 3,0 3,5 4,0 4,5 5,0 lo g (N /N 0 ) tempo (min)
aw=0,99 aw=0,95 NaCl aw=0,95 glicerol pH=4.5
pH=7.5
T=52.5 °C T=65.0 °C
- 7 - 6 - 5 - 4 - 3 - 2 - 1 0 0 1 2 3 4 - 7 - 6 - 5 - 4 - 3 - 2 - 1 0 0 4 8 12 1 6 -7 -6 -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 0 50 10 0 1 50 200 log(N/N0) Time (mi n) log(N/N0) log(N/N0) Time (min) Time (min) 52.5°C 60.0°C 65.0°C - 7 - 6 - 5 - 4 - 3 - 2 - 1 0 0 1 2 3 4 - 7 - 6 - 5 - 4 - 3 - 2 - 1 0 0 4 8 12 1 6 -7 -6 -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 0 50 10 0 1 50 200 log(N/N0) Time (mi n) log(N/N0) log(N/N0) Time (min) Time (min) - 7 - 6 - 5 - 4 - 3 - 2 - 1 0 0 1 2 3 4 - 7 - 6 - 5 - 4 - 3 - 2 - 1 0 0 4 8 12 1 6 -7 -6 -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 0 50 10 0 1 50 200 log(N/N0) Time (mi n) log(N/N0) log(N/N0) Time (min) Time (min) - 7 - 6 - 5 - 4 - 3 - 2 - 1 0 0 1 2 3 4 - 7 - 6 - 5 - 4 - 3 - 2 - 1 0 0 4 8 12 1 6 -7 -6 -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 0 50 10 0 1 50 200 log(N/N0) Time (mi n) log(N/N0) log(N/N0) Time (min) Time (min) 52.5°C 60.0°C 65.0°C
Microbial content
= f (time
,
temperature,
pH
,
water activity
)
pH=6.2 aw=0.998
n 0 i n 0 j j k w Tail 0 res G a pH N N log ij
1
0
0
0
t
L
N
N
log
e
k
exp
exp
N
N
log
N
N
log
res
max
res
n 0 i n 0 j n 0 k i j k w k max exp G a pH T k ijk max
n 0 i n 0 j n 0 k i j k w L a pH T G exp L ijk pH = 6.2 aw= 0.998 T = 52.5°C to 65.0 °C- 7 - 6 - 5 - 4 - 3 - 2 - 1 0 0 1 2 3 4 - 7 - 6 - 5 - 4 - 3 - 2 - 1 0 0 4 8 12 1 6 -7 -6 -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 0 50 10 0 1 50 200 log(N/N0) Time (mi n) log(N/N0) log(N/N0) Time (min) Time (min) 52.5°C 60.0°C 65.0°C - 7 - 6 - 5 - 4 - 3 - 2 - 1 0 0 1 2 3 4 - 7 - 6 - 5 - 4 - 3 - 2 - 1 0 0 4 8 12 1 6 -7 -6 -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 0 50 10 0 1 50 200 log(N/N0) Time (mi n) log(N/N0) log(N/N0) Time (min) Time (min) - 7 - 6 - 5 - 4 - 3 - 2 - 1 0 0 1 2 3 4 - 7 - 6 - 5 - 4 - 3 - 2 - 1 0 0 4 8 12 1 6 -7 -6 -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 0 50 10 0 1 50 200 log(N/N0) Time (mi n) log(N/N0) log(N/N0) Time (min) Time (min) - 7 - 6 - 5 - 4 - 3 - 2 - 1 0 0 1 2 3 4 - 7 - 6 - 5 - 4 - 3 - 2 - 1 0 0 4 8 12 1 6 -7 -6 -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 0 50 10 0 1 50 200 log(N/N0) Time (mi n) log(N/N0) log(N/N0) Time (min) Time (min) 52.5°C 60.0°C 65.0°C
Initial counts: N0~ 107 CFU/mg
pH=6.2
- 7 - 6 - 5 - 4 - 3 - 2 - 1 0 0 1 2 3 4 - 7 - 6 - 5 - 4 - 3 - 2 - 1 0 0 4 8 12 1 6 -7 -6 -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 0 50 10 0 1 50 200 log(N/N0) Time (mi n) log(N/N0) log(N/N0) Time (min) Time (min) 52.5°C 60.0°C 65.0°C - 7 - 6 - 5 - 4 - 3 - 2 - 1 0 0 1 2 3 4 - 7 - 6 - 5 - 4 - 3 - 2 - 1 0 0 4 8 12 1 6 -7 -6 -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 0 50 10 0 1 50 200 log(N/N0) Time (mi n) log(N/N0) log(N/N0) Time (min) Time (min) - 7 - 6 - 5 - 4 - 3 - 2 - 1 0 0 1 2 3 4 - 7 - 6 - 5 - 4 - 3 - 2 - 1 0 0 4 8 12 1 6 -7 -6 -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 0 50 10 0 1 50 200 log(N/N0) Time (mi n) log(N/N0) log(N/N0) Time (min) Time (min) - 7 - 6 - 5 - 4 - 3 - 2 - 1 0 0 1 2 3 4 - 7 - 6 - 5 - 4 - 3 - 2 - 1 0 0 4 8 12 1 6 -7 -6 -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 0 50 10 0 1 50 200 log(N/N0) Time (mi n) log(N/N0) log(N/N0) Time (min) Time (min) 52.5°C 60.0°C 65.0°C
Microbial content
= f (time
,
temperature,
pH
,
water activity
)
pH=6.2aw=0.998
Can results obtained in broth be applied in
predicting microbial responses in solid foods ?
Results
corroborate
that
microbial
kinetic
behaviour
in
“real”
food
surfaces differs to the one observed in
broth. Consequently, caution should
be taken when using the latter ones in
food processing predictions.
1.
1. Heat
Heat Processing
Processing –
– effect
effect on
on food
food quality
quality and
and safety
safety
2.
2. Combining
Combining Heat
Heat and
and other
other Non
Non--Thermal
Thermal Technologies
Technologies to
to
preserve
preserve foods
foods
3
3..New
New Approaches
Approaches on
on Understanding
Understanding Heat
Heat Degradation
Degradation in
in
Foods
Ozone
Ultrasonication / Thermosonication
ultrasound equipment (Bandelin Sonorex RK 100H) operating at 32 kHz
ozone generator, concentration
measured by potential difference, 0.3 ppm
watercress
Nasturtium officinale
Types of combined treatments with ultrasound
Heat + Ultrasound
watercress
Nasturtium officinaleQuality
Colour changes
Vitamin C
Peroxidase
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 Time (min) C /C o 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 Time (min) C /C o 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 Time (min) C /C o 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 Time (min) C /C o 82.5 ºC Blanching US 87.5 ºC Peroxidase Blanching Blanching Blanching 85.0 ºC 90.0 ºC US US US
The application of thermosonication
- temperatures above 85 ºC and for the same blanching times
led to higher enzyme inactivation when compared to
heat blanching processes
These results allow the application of shorter blanching times at this
range of temperatures, leading to a product with a higher quality, or
minimized processing
Colour 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 Time (s) T C D 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 Time (s) T C D 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 Time (s) T C D 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 Time (s) T C D 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 Time (s) T C D Blanching Blanching 82.5 ºC 85.0 ºC 87.5 ºC 90.0 ºC 92.5 ºC Blanching Blanching Blanching US US US US US
The application of thermosonication
Reaction rates of watercress colour changes due to heat and
thermosonication blanchings were not significantly different
Vitamin C 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 Time (min) C /C o 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 Time (min) C /C o 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 Time (min) C /C o 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 Time (min) C /C o 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 Time (min) C /C o 82.5 ºC 85 ºC 87.5 ºC 90 ºC 92.5 ºC Blanching Blanching Blanching Blanching Blanching US US US US US Vitamin C
The application of thermosonication
Vitamin C
Results showed no significant differences between heat and
thermosonication treatments
The thermosonication treatments can be a good alternative
to the traditional heat blanching processes,
since higher quality products are attained
The application of thermosonication
red bell pepper
Capsicum annuum, L. Nasturtium officinaleSafety
watercress
strawberries Fragaria ananassared bell pepper
Listeria
Listeria innocua
innocua
(artificially inoculated)
watercress
Total coliforms
Total coliforms
(autoctone flora)strawberries
Total mesophiles
Total mesophiles
(autoctone flora) Palcam Agar PCA VRBA0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 US US 50º US 60º US 65º O3 UV L og (N 0 /N ) listeria US H2O US H2O US/H2O US/H2O O3 UV 15ºC 50ºC 60ºC 65ºC Treatment
Treatment timetime = 2 = 2 minmin
5
5 replicatesreplicates Listeria innocua
coliformes 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 US 15º US 50º US 55º US 65º O3 UV L o g ( N /N 0 ) US H2O US H2O US/H2O US/H2O O3 UV 15ºC 50ºC 60ºC 65ºC Treatment
Treatment timetime = 2 = 2 minmin
5
5 replicatesreplicates Total coliforms
-1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
US 2min US 50º 2min US 65º 2min O3 2 min UV
L o g ( N /N 0 ) mesofilos Treatment
Treatment timetime = 2 = 2 minmin
5
5 replicatesreplicates Total mesophiles
Initial counts: ~ 107 CFU/mg
US/H2O US/H2O US/H2O O3
Thermosonication
Ozone in aqueous solution
UV-C radiation
• Thermosonication is a promising technique
• Ozonated water-washings are equivalent to simple water-washings
• UV-C radiation is not efficient
1.
1. Heat
Heat Processing
Processing –
– effect
effect on
on food
food quality
quality and
and safety
safety
2.
2. Combining
Combining Heat
Heat and
and other
other Non
Non--Thermal
Thermal Technologies
Technologies to
to
preserve
preserve foods
foods
3
3..New
New Approaches
Approaches on
on Understanding
Understanding Heat
Heat Degradation
Degradation in
in
Foods
Food reactions often do not occur isolated but rather within a chain of complex
Food reactions often do not occur isolated but rather within a chain of complex
reactions, all dependent on several different environmental conditions
Limited Information Pure mathematical
Limited Information Multiresponse modeling Better Predictions Understanding Reaction Mechanism
Accounts for information of both
reactants and products involved
Measuring several responses of a food system at the same time
Insighful parameter estimation
Pure mathematical Semi-empirical
Food reactions often do not occur isolated but rather within a chain of complex
• enzymatic reactions (Torres, Lessard & Hill, 2003; Barros & Malcata, 2004)
• chlorophyll degradation in foods (van Boekel, 1999)
• lactic fermentation during pickled carrot manufacture (Nabais & Malcata, 1997)
• Maillard reaction (van Boekel, 1998)
• acrylamide formation (Knol, Van Loon, Linssen, Ruck, Van Boekel & Voragen, 2005)
Case Study:
Multiresponse Modelling of the Caramelisation Reaction
Glucose Fructose+ H+ Sucrose H+ + H2O Fructose Oligosaccharides + + Other degradation products Enediol Intermediate HMF Furfural Acidic degradation products Other degradation products Other degradation products Acidic degradation products Other degradation products Other degradation products 5-methylfurfural Sucrose hydrolysis sucrose thermal sucrose thermal degradation in degradation in the absence the absence of amino groups of amino groupsExperimental
Glucose Fructose+ H+ Sucrose H+ + H2O Fructose Oligosaccharides + + Other degradation products Enediol Intermediate HMF Furfural Acidic degradation products Other degradation products Other degradation products Acidic degradation products Other degradation products Other degradation products 5-methylfurfural Temperature range: 100 to 180ºC Water Content: 3 a 30% (w/w)HPLC
pH measurements 5-hydroxymethyl-furfuralExperimental Results Sucrose 0.0E+00 1.0E-03 2.0E-03 3.0E-03 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 time (min) C ( m o l/ g )
Fructose and Glucose
0.0E+00 1.0E-03 2.0E-03 3.0E-03 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 time (min) C ( m o l/ g ) HMF and Furfural 0.0E+00 5.0E-05 1.0E-04 1.5E-04 2.0E-04 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 time (min) C ( m o l/ g ) 0.0E+00 5.0E-06 1.0E-05
Supercooled sucrose solution (25.30 (w/w)% water content)
T= 140ºC pH 0 2 4 6 8 10 0 50 100 150 200 time (min) p H m e te r re a d in g HMF Furfural Glucose Fructose
Observed in 12.20 to 30.03 (w/w)% water content solutions at all tested temperatures Glucose Fructose+ H+ Sucrose H+ + H2O Fructose Oligosaccharides + + degradation products Enediol Intermediate HMF Furfural + H+ Acidic degradation products Other degradation products 2 Other degradation products (Acidic degradation products) Other degradation products Other degradation Products 1 5-methylfurfural + H+ k1 k2 k6 k4 k5 k3 one example of one example of the mechanisms the mechanisms tested tested
Glucose H+ Sucrose H+ Fructose + + HMF Furfural + H+ OP2 H++ OP1
k
1k
3k
2k
5k
4k
6
k
1Sucrose
H
Sucrose
H k
Glucose
k1 6
Glucose
k6
Furfural
k
5
Sucrose
H
k
Fructose
k
Fructose
k
1
3
2
Fructose
k
HMF
k3 4
HMF
k
Furfural
k
4
5
Fructose
k
HMF
k2 4 dt products / ts tan reac dTemperature and Water Content effect on reaction kinetics
ref
s
s
ref
s
T
T
R
Ea
exp
k
k
1
1
Glucose H+ Sucrose H+ Fructose + + HMF Furfural + H+ OP2 H++ OP1k
1k
3k
2k
5k
4k
6)
bC
exp(
a
k
, , , ,ref
13 45 6
k
ref
constant
2
constant
Global Model
Sucrose 0.0E+00 1.0E-03 2.0E-03 3.0E-03 0 50 100 150 200 time (min) C ( m o l/ g )Fructose and Glucose
0.0E+00 1.0E-03 2.0E-03 3.0E-03 0 50 100 150 200 time (min) C ( m o l/ g ) Furfural 0.0E+00 1.0E-06 2.0E-06 3.0E-06 4.0E-06 0 50 100 150 200 time (min) C ( m o l/ g ) HM F 0.0E+00 5.0E-05 1.0E-04 1.5E-04 2.0E-04 0 50 100 150 200 time (min) C ( m o l/ g ) Estimates precision: 2 – 45% (95%CI /2p)
Supercooled sucrose solution (25.30 (w/w)% water content)
T= 140ºC Higher water
content solutions
Athena Visual Studio Software
Glucose
Model Inadequacy for Reactions Occurring at Extremely Low Water Content HMF 0.0E+00 5.0E-05 1.0E-04 1.5E-04 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 time (min) C ( m o l/ g ) Glucose 0.0E+00 1.0E-03 2.0E-03 3.0E-03 4.0E-03 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 time (min) C ( m o l/ g ) Sucrose 0.0E+00 1.0E-03 2.0E-03 3.0E-03 4.0E-03 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 time (min) C ( m o l/ g ) Fructose 0.0E+00 1.0E-03 2.0E-03 3.0E-03 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 time (min) C ( m o l/ g )
Supercooled sucrose solution (3.58 (w/w)% water content)
T= 120ºC Low water Low water content content solutions solutions
Glucose Fructose+ H+ Sucrose H+ + H2O Fructose Oligosaccharides + + Other degradation products Enediol Intermediate HMF Furfural + H+ Acidic degradation products Other degradation products 2 Other degradation products (Acidic degradation products) Other degradation products Other degradation Products 1 5-methylfurfural + H+
For low water For low water content values a content values a different mechanism different mechanism should be assumed should be assumed
+
This work demonstrates the usefulness of
multiresponse
modelling
in understanding reaction mechanisms in food
matrices, by elucidating major reaction steps under different
conditions and by allowing good prediction of temperature and
water content effects
Heating Foods
Heating Foods
Integrating Quality and Safety in Thermal
Integrating Quality and Safety in Thermal
Processes
Processes
Mafalda Quintas, Teresa Brandão(*) & Cristina L.M. Silva
CBQF – Centro de Biotecnologia e Química Fina School of Biotechnology
Catholic University of Portugal
Harmonization of Standards in Thermal Processing
October 27-29, 2009 Porto, Portugal