• Nenhum resultado encontrado

Antiretroviral drugs saquinavir and ritonavir reduce inhibitory concentration values of itraconazole against Histoplasma capsulatum strains in vitro

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Antiretroviral drugs saquinavir and ritonavir reduce inhibitory concentration values of itraconazole against Histoplasma capsulatum strains in vitro"

Copied!
5
0
0

Texto

(1)

w w w . e l s e v i e r . c o m / l o c a t e / b j i d

The

Brazilian

Journal

of

INFECTIOUS

DISEASES

Original

article

Antiretroviral

drugs

saquinavir

and

ritonavir

reduce

inhibitory

concentration

values

of

itraconazole

against

Histoplasma

capsulatum

strains

in

vitro

Raimunda

Sâmia

Nogueira

Brilhante

a,b,∗

,

Érica

Pacheco

Caetano

a

,

Giovanna

Barbosa

Riello

a

,

Glaucia

Morgana

de

Melo

Guedes

a

,

Débora

de

Souza

Collares

Maia

Castelo-Branco

a,b

,

Maria

Auxiliadora

Bezerra

Fechine

b

,

Jonathas

Sales

de

Oliveira

a

,

Zoilo

Pires

de

Camargo

e

,

Jacó

Ricarte

Lima

de

Mesquita

f

,

André

Jalles

Monteiro

d

,

Rossana

de

Aguiar

Cordeiro

a,b

,

Marcos

Fábio

Gadelha

Rocha

a,c

,

José

Júlio

Costa

Sidrim

a,b

aSpecializedMedicalMycologyCenter,PostgraduatePrograminMedicalMicrobiology,UniversidadeFederaldoCeará(UFC),Fortaleza, CE,Brazil

bPostgraduatePrograminMedicalSciences,UniversidadeFederaldoCeará(UFC),Fortaleza,CE,Brazil cPostgraduatePrograminVeterinarySciences,UniversidadeEstadualdoCeará(UECE),Fortaleza,CE,Brazil dDepartmentofStatisticsandAppliedMathematics,UniversidadeFederaldoCeará(UFC),Fortaleza,CE,Brazil

eDepartmentofMicrobiology,ImmunologyandParasitology,UniversidadeFederaldeSãoPaulo(UNIFESP),SãoPaulo,SP,Brazil fHospitalSãoJosé,Fortaleza,CE,Brazil

a

r

t

i

c

l

e

i

n

f

o

Articlehistory:

Received25February2015 Accepted25November2015 Availableonline31December2015

Keywords: Histoplasmacapsulatum Saquinavir Ritonavir Itraconazole

a

b

s

t

r

a

c

t

Recent studieshaveshownthatsomedrugsthatarenotroutinelyusedtotreatfungal infectionshaveantifungalactivity,suchasproteaseinhibitorantiretroviraldrugs.Thisstudy investigatedtheinvitrosusceptibilityofHistoplasmacapsulatumvar.capsulatumtosaquinavir andritonavir,anditscombinationwiththeantifungalitraconazole.Thesusceptibilityassay was performedaccordingtoClinical and LaboratoryStandardsInstituteguidelines. All strainswereinhibitedbytheproteaseinhibitorantiretroviraldrugs.Saquinavirshowed min-imuminhibitoryconcentrationsrangingfrom0.125to1␮gmL−1forbothphases,and

riton-avirpresentedminimuminhibitoryconcentrationsrangingfrom0.0312to4␮gmL−1and

from0.0625to1␮gmL−1forfilamentousandyeastphase,respectively.Concerningthe

anti-fungalitraconazole,theminimuminhibitoryconcentrationvaluesrangedfrom0.0019to 0.125␮gmL−1andfrom0.0039to0.0312␮gmL−1forthefilamentousandyeastphase,

respec-tively.Thecombinationofsaquinavirorritonavirwithitraconazolewassynergisticagainst

H.capsulatum,withasignificantreductionintheminimuminhibitoryconcentrationsofboth drugsagainstthestrains(p<0.05).Thesedatashowanimportantinvitrosynergybetween proteaseinhibitorsanditraconazoleagainstthefungusH.capsulatum.

©2016PublishedbyElsevierEditoraLtda.ThisisanopenaccessarticleundertheCC BY-NC-NDlicense(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Correspondingauthor.

E-mailaddress:brilhante@ufc.br(R.S.N.Brilhante). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjid.2015.11.003

1413-8670/© 2016 Published by Elsevier Editora Ltda. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

(2)

Introduction

Histoplasmosisisasystemicinfectioncausedbythe dimor-phic fungusHistoplasmacapsulatum. Itismainly associated withimmunosuppression,especiallyinHIVpatients.1,2 This disease is characterized by a broad spectrum of clinical manifestations ranging from asymptomatic to dissemi-natedforms.3 Histoplasmosisis iswidelydistributed inthe Americas.4 InBrazil,thenumber ofcaseshasincreasedin severalregions. Someoutbreakshavebeen recordedinthe country,involvingthestatesofRiodeJaneiro,SãoPaulo,Minas Gerais,EspíritoSanto,MatoGrosso,andRioGrandedoSul.4–6 InCearástate,arecentstudyreported254casesof histoplas-mosisinpatientswithHIVintheperiodfrom2006to2010, showingitshighprevalenceinthisregion.7

Treatmentofhistoplasmosis dependson theseverity of infection,clinicalmanifestationsandindividualriskfactors. The therapy indicated for mild to moderate cases is the administration ofazoles, such as itraconazole. Theuse of amphotericinBislimitedtoseverecasesbecauseofitshigh toxicity.Duetotheincreaseofhistoplasmosiscasesinrecent years,particularlyamongHIVpatients,associatedwiththe occurrence of refractory and recurrent infections, there is a needto find newtherapeutic approaches to controlthis mycosis.8,9Somestudieshaveshownthatcertaindrugsnot routinelyusedtotreatfungalinfectionshavesignificant anti-fungalactivity.10Amongthese,theantiretroviraldrugshave demonstratedtheabilitytointerferewiththeviabilityand vir-ulenceoffungalcells.Theproteaseinhibitorsindinavirand ritonavir haveshown in vitro and in vivo inhibitoryeffects againstCandidaalbicans.11Indinaviralsohasshownactivity againstthefungusCryptococcusneoformans,reducingits viru-lenceandmakingitmoresusceptibletothekillingactivityof naturaleffectorcellsoftheimmunesystem.12

Thus,thisstudyaimedtoevaluatetheinvitro susceptibil-ityofH.capsulatumvar.capsulatumtotheantiretroviraldrugs saquinavirandritonavir,aswellastheircombinationwiththe azoleantifungalitraconazole.

Materials

and

methods

Microorganisms

Weusedatotalof20clinicalstrainsofH.capsulatuminthe fil-amentousphaseand10intheyeastphase,isolatedfromthe NortheastandSoutheastregionsofBrazil.Thesamplescame fromtheculturecollectionoftheSpecializedMedical Mycol-ogyCenter,FederalUniversityofCeará,andwerehandledin abiosafetylevel3cabin.

Antifungalagents

Stocksolutionsoftheantiretroviraldrugssaquinavir(Roche HoldingAG,Basel,Switzerland)andritonavir(Abbott Labora-tories,Chicago,USA)andtheantifungalitraconazole(Janssen Pharmaceutica,Beerse,Belgium)werepreparedindimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO). These solutions were stored at −20◦C untiluse. Serialdilutions ofeach antimicrobialagentwere

preparedinRPMI1640(SigmaChemicalCorporation,St.Louis, MO,USA),supplementedwithl-glutamine,bufferedatapH of7.0withMOPS165mmoll−1(SigmaChemicalCorporation, St.Louis,MO,USA).

Preparationoffungalinoculum

Topreparetheinoculum,fungalsuspensionswereprepared insalinefromstockculturesaftersevendaysofincubation, maintainedonBHI(brainheartinfusion)agarandincubated at28◦Cforthefilamentousphase.Thecultureswere main-tainedonBHIagarsupplementedwithsheepbloodat10%and incubated at35◦Ctoobtain theyeastphase.Theinoculum wasadjustedto90–95%bytransmittancespectrophotometry at awavelength of530nm. After reading,the suspensions werediluted1:10inRPMI1640mediumtoobtaininoculums ofapproximately0.5×103to2.5×104cfumL−1.13

Susceptibilitytest

The in vitro antifungal activity was determined by the broth microdilution method in accordance with the pro-tocol described in document M27-A3 and standardized by the Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute.14 Initially, the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) was determined for each drug. Subsequently, the MIC values were used as the highest concentration to prepare drugs in com-bination. The concentration ranges of the drugs alone were: 0.0039–2␮gmL−1 forsaquinavir, 0.0156–8␮gmL−1 for ritonavir, and 0.0009–0.5␮gmL−1 foritraconazole. The con-centration ranges of the drugs in combination were: 0.0002–1␮gmL−1forsaquinavir,0.00006–4␮gmL−1for riton-avirand0.000003–0.0625␮gmL−1foritraconazole.Theresults were determined by visual readings after seven and four daysofincubationat35◦Cforstrainsinthefilamentousand yeastphase,respectively.TheMICsweredefinedasthe low-est concentration ofdrugableto inhibit80% ofthe fungal growth forantiretroviral drugsand itraconazole,as wellas forthecombinationofboth.13Druginteractionwasevaluated bycalculating the fractional inhibitoryconcentrationindex (FICI),whichwasclassifiedassynergistic(FICI≤0.5), indiffer-ent(0.5<FICI<4),orantagonistic(FICI≥4).15TheFICIvalues obtained for each drug combination against H. capsulatum

were comparedthroughWilcoxontest(p<0.05).The analy-sis wascarried out usingIBMSPSS ver. 21.0software (IBM Co.,Armonk,NY,USA).StandardstrainsofCandida parapsilo-sisATCC22019andCandidakruseiATCC6258wereincludedin eachtestasqualitycontrols.

Results

Theproteaseinhibitorssaquinavirandritonavirwere capa-bleofinhibitingthestrainsofH.capsulatum,withMICvalues rangingfrom 0.125to1␮gmL−1 forsaquinavirinboth fila-mentousandyeastphase;andfrom0.0312to4␮gmL−1and from0.0625to1␮gmL−1forritonavirinfilamentousandyeast phase, respectively (Table 1). Concerning itraconazole, the MICrangedfrom0.0019to0.0625␮gmL−1andfrom0.0039to

(3)

Table1–MICsofantiretroviraldrugsanditraconazoleagainststrainsofHistoplasmacapsulatumvar.capsulatumin yeast-likeandmycelialforms.

Strains Saquinavi(␮gmL−1) Ritonavir(␮gmL−1) Itraconazole(␮gmL−1)

Mycelialform 0.125(2)a 0.0312(1) 0.0019(2) 0.25(6) 0.125(1) 0.0078(4) 0.5(8) 0.5(4) 0.0156(6) 1(4) 1(5) 0.0312(6) 2(5) 0.0625(2) 4(4) Yeastform 0.125(3) 0.0625(4) 0.0039(1) 0.25(1) 0.125(3) 0.0078(4) 0.5(4) 0.5(2) 0.0156(2) 1(2) 1(1) 0.0312(3)

a Numberoftestedstrains.

0.0312␮gmL−1 forthefilamentousandyeastphase, respec-tively(Table1).

Synergistic interactions were observed for the combi-nations of saquinavir or ritonavir with itraconazole, and therewasasignificantreductionintheMICofthesedrugs: saquinavir (p=0.0000) and itraconazole (p=0.0000) for fila-mentous and yeast phases; and ritonavir (p=0.0001) and itraconazole (p=0.0003) for filamentous phase and riton-avir(p=0.0297)anditraconazole (p=0.0015) foryeastphase (Table2).Noantagonisticinteractionswereobserved.

Discussion

Inrecentyears,studieshaveshownthatHIVpatientscanhave substantiallylongerlifeexpectancy,dependingonadherence toantiretroviraltreatmentandtheevolutionoftheimmune status.Also,theuseofmoreeffectivetherapydecreasesthe incidenceofopportunisticinfections,including histoplasmo-sis. Even though the use of protease inhibitors, including saquinavir, has been associated with the development of severalsideeffects, recent studieshavedemonstrated that the use of liposome saquinavir formulations significantly decreases the levels of cytotoxicity, besides improving the bioavailabilityofthisdrug.16

Moreover,ithasbeenobservedthattheproteaseinhibitors canhavebeneficialeffectsonsomefungalinfections,notonly bymodulatingthe immunesystemofthe susceptiblehost, butalsobyexertingdirectactionagainstthepathogen.17 It

hasalsobeenobservedfrominvitroandinvivostudiesthat proteaseinhibitorsreducethepathogenicityandgrowthofC. albicansprobablybecausethesedrugsactdirectlyonthe pro-ductionoftheenzymeaspartyl-proteinases,whichissecreted bythisorganismintheprocessesofinvasionandcolonization ofhosttissues.18–20Additionally,ithasbeenshownthat riton-avir inhibitstheinvitrohyphalgrowth rateofC.albicans,21 ritonavirandsaquinavirinhibittheadherenceofC.albicans

toendothelialcells,22andsaquinavir,ritonavir,andindinavir attenuatetheinvitroadherenceofC.albicanstoacrylic sub-stances,whichisacommoncomponentoforalappliances.23 Morerecently,itwasobservedthattheproteaseinhibitors saquinavir,darunavir,ritonavir,andindinavirdidnotreduce theinvitrogrowthofC.neoformans,butreducedprotease activ-ityaswellascapsuleproduction,importantvirulencefactors ofC.neoformans.24 Althoughthereare somestudieson the actionofproteaseinhibitorsagainstfungi,noreportsforH. capsulatumhavebeenpublishedsofar.

In the present study, we observed that the protease inhibitorssaquinavirandritonaviraloneinhibitedH. capsu-latum,andsaquinavirandritonavirinteractedsynergistically withitraconazole,asevidencedbytheincreasedinvitro activ-ityoftheantifungaldrug.Theadvantageofthe synergistic effect of the combination of antiretroviral and antifungal drugsaimstoattenuatetoxiceffectscausedbythem, espe-ciallyincasesoflong-termtherapies,suchasinHIV-infected patientspresentingwithhistoplasmosis.2

Casolarietal.25foundthatsaquinaviralonedidnotshow significant antifungalactivity againstthe yeastformsofC.

Table2–EffectsofthecombinationofantiretroviraldrugsanditraconazoleonstrainsofH.capsulatumvar.capsulatumin yeast-likeandmycelialforms.

Strains Drugs MIC–geometricmean (isolateddrugs)

MIC–geometricmean (combineddrugs)

FICIgeometric mean

Results Numberofstrains presentingsynergism Antiretroviral Antifungal Antiretroviral Antifungal

Mycelial form SAQ/ITC 0.4 0.01 0.002 0.0001 0.007 S 20/20 RIT/ITC 1.03 0.01 0.27 0.004 0.5 S 13/20 Yeast form SAQ/ITC 0.45 0.01 0.02 0.001 0.12 S 10/10 RIT/ITC 0.15 0.01 0.01 0.001 0.16 S 10/10

(4)

albicansandC.neoformans.However,whencombinedwiththe azoledrugfluconazole,itwasfoundtoinhibitthegrowthof thesefungalspecies,indicatingtheoccurrenceofsynergism betweenthedrugs.Similarly,Palmeiraetal.26describedthe effectofnelfinavirandsaquinaviragainstthedematious fun-gusFonsecaeapedrosoiandconfirmedthatthesecompounds alone were unable to inhibit the growth of this fungus. However,inhibitiondidoccurwhensub-inhibitorydosesof theseproteaseinhibitorswerecombinedwithamphotericin B.Mikusetal.27notedthatritonavirprolongstheclearanceof voriconazole,althoughtheuseofritonavirwithvoriconazole is contraindicated because the former lowers the plasma levelsofvoriconazole.

Ourdatademonstratedaninvitrosynergisticinteraction betweensaquinavirorritonavirwithitraconazoleagainstthe dimorphicfungusH.capsulatum.Themechanismunderlying theobservedsynergyremainsunknown,butCrommentuyn etal.28showedthattheinvivocombinationofantiretroviral lopinavir/ritonaviranditraconazole interactsthrough phar-macokineticpathways,interferingwiththemetabolismofthe antifungaldrug,whichincreasestheplasmalevelofthe anti-fungalagent,thus,makingitpossibletoreducethedosageof itraconazolewithoutimpairingthetreatment.Basedonour findings,webelievethatsaquinavirorritonavirwith itracona-zoleinteractprobablythroughpharmacodynamicpathways.

Thesedata showan importantinvitrosynergy between saquinavirorritonaviranditraconazoleagainstthefungusH. capsulatum,whichisanimportantpathogenforAIDSpatients.

Conflicts

of

interest

Theauthorsdeclarenoconflictsofinterest.

Acknowledgments

ThisresearchwassupportedbyCNPqprocess(303396/2014-8; 552161/2011-0)andCAPES(AE1–0052-000630100/11).

r

e

f

e

r

e

n

c

e

s

1. AdenisAA,AznarC,CouppiéP.Histoplasmosisin HIV-infectedpatients:areviewofnewdevelopmentsand remaininggaps.CurrTropMedRep.2014;1:119–28. 2. DaherEF,SilvaGB,BarrosFAS,etal.Clinicalandlaboratory

featuresofdisseminatedhistoplasmosisinHIVpatientsfrom Brazil.TropMedIntHealth.2007;12:1108–15.

3. LaHozRM,LoydJE,WheatLJ,BaddleyJW.HowItreat histoplasmosis.CurrFungalInfectRep.2013;7:36–43. 4. FerreiraS,BorgesA.Histoplasmose.RevSocBrasMedTrop.

2009;42:192–8.

5. UnisG,DeMattosOF,SeveroLC.Histoplasmosedisseminada noRioGrandedoSul.RevSocBrasMedTrop.2004;37:463–8. 6. PassosAN,KoharaVS,deFreitasRS,VicentiniAP.

Immunologicalassaysemployedfortheelucidationofan histoplasmosisoutbreakinSãoPaulo,SP.BrazJMicrobiol. 2015;45:1357–61.

7. BrilhanteRSN,FechineMAB,MesquitaJRL,etal. HistoplasmosisinHIV-positivepatientsinCeará,Brazil: clinical-laboratoryaspectsandinvitroantifungal

susceptibilityofHistoplasmacapsulatumisolates.TransRSoc TropMedHyg.2012;106:484–8.

8.WheatLJ,FreifeldAG,KleimanMB,etal.Clinicalpractice guidelinesforthemanagementofpatientswith histoplasmosis:2007updatebytheInfectiousDiseases SocietyofAmerica.ClinInfectDis.2007;45:

807–25.

9.CordeiroRDA,MarquesFJDF,BrilhanteRSN,etal.Synergistic effectofantituberculosisdrugsandazolesinvitroagainst

Histoplasmacapsulatumvar.capsulatum.AntimicrobAgents Chemother.2011;55:4482–4.

10.StylianouM,KulesskiyE,LopesJP,GranlundM,Wennerberg K,UrbanCF.Antifungalapplicationofnonantifungaldrugs. AntimicrobAgentsChemother.2014;58:1055–62.

11.CassoneA,DeBernardisF,TorosantucciA,TacconelliE, TumbarelloM,CaudaR.Invitroandinvivoanticandidal activityofhumanimmunodeficiencyvirusprotease inhibitors.JInfectDis.1999;180:448–53.

12.PericoliniE,CenciE,MonariC,etal.Indinavir-treated

Cryptococcusneoformanspromotesanefficientantifungal immuneresponseinimmunosuppressedhosts.MedMycol. 2006;44:119–26.

13.BrilhanteR,FechineM,CordeiroR,etal.Invitroeffectof sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprimagainstHistoplasma capsulatumvar.capsulatum.AntimicrobAgentsChemother. 2010;54:3978–9.

14.CLSI.ReferenceMethodforBrothDilutionantifungal susceptibilitytestingofyeasts.3rded.Wayne,PA:Approved StandardM27-A3.ClinicalLaboratoryStandardsInstitute; 2008.

15.OddsFC.Synergyantagonism,andwhatthechequerboard putsbetweenthem.JAntimicrobChemother.2003;52:1. 16.RamanaLN,SharmaS,SethuramanS,RangaU,KrishnanUM.

Investigationonthestabilityofsaquinavirloadedliposomes: implicationonstealth,releasecharacteristicsand

cytotoxicity.IntJPharm.2012;431:120–9.

17.NobreV,BragaE,RayesA,etal.Opportunisticinfectionsin patientswithAIDSadmittedtoanuniversityhospitalofthe SoutheastofBrazil.RevInstMedTropSaoPaulo.

2003;45:69–74.

18.SantosAL,Braga-SilvaLA.Asparticproteaseinhibitors: effectivedrugsagainstthehumanfungalpathogenCandida albicans.MiniRevMedChem.2013;13:155–62.

19.BekticJ,LellCP,FuchsA,etal.HIVproteaseinhibitors attenuateadherenceofCandidaalbicanstoepithelialcells

invitro.FEMSImmunolMedMicrobiol.2001;31:65–71. 20.CassoneA,TacconelliE,DeBernardisF,etal.Antiretroviral

therapywithproteaseinhibitorshasanearly,immune reconstitution-independentbeneficialeffectonCandida

virulenceandoralcandidiasisinhumanimmunodeficiency virus-infectedsubjects.JInfectDis.2002;185:188–95. 21.MeloNR,VilelaMMS,JorgeJ.HIV-1anti-retroviraldrugeffect

ontheC.albicanshyphalgrowthratebyabio-celltracer system.BrazJMicrobiol.2006;37:225–9.

22.FalkensammerB,PilzG,BekticJ,etal.Absentreductionby HIVproteaseinhibitorsofCandidaalbicansadhesionto endothelialcells.Mycoses.2007;50:172–7.

23.TsangCSP,HongI.HIVproteaseinhibitorsdifferentially inhibitadhesionofCandidaalbicanstoacrylicsurfaces. Mycoses.2010;53:488–94.

24.SidrimJJC,Perdigão-NetoLV,CordeiroRA,etal.Viralprotease inhibitorsaffecttheproductionofvirulencefactorsin

Cryptococcusneoformans.CanJMicrobiol.2012;58:932–6. 25.CasolariC,RossiT,BaggioG,etal.Interactionbetween saquinavirandantimycoticdrugsonC.albicansandC. neoformansstrains.PharmacolRes.2004;50:605–10. 26.PalmeiraVF,KneippLF,RozentalS,AlvianoCS,SantosALS.

(5)

pedrosoi:promisingcompoundstoarrestkeyfungalbiological processesandvirulence.PLoSONE.2008;3.

27.MikusG,SchowelV,DrzewinskaM,etal.Potentcytochrome P4502C19genotype-relatedinteractionbetweenvoriconazole andthecytochromeP4503A4inhibitorritonavir.Clin PharmacolTher.2006;80:126–35.

28.CrommentuynKML,MulderJW,SparidansRW,HuitemaADR, SchellensJHM,BeijnenJH.Drug–druginteractionbetween itraconazoleandtheantiretroviraldruglopinavir/ritonavirin anHIV-1-infectedpatientwithdisseminatedhistoplasmosis. ClinInfectDis.2004;38:e73–5.

Referências

Documentos relacionados

In vitro activity of itraconazole in combination with terbinafine against clinical strains of itraconazole- insensitive

In vivo efficacy assays - Once the in vitro inhibitory and parasiticide activities of the test compounds against the promastigote stage had been demonstrated and af- ter

The selected fault model is used in most common fault scenarios for microprocessor based critical systems [8] and consists of single bit-flip faults in random memory elements,

According to the results shown we could say that: i) majority of the essential oils and phytochemicals tested showed some “in vitro” inhibitory activity against moulds,

Fluconazole, itraconazole, and flucytosine have excellent in vitro activity against all tested clinical Cryptococcus spp., and we also found a high rate of tolerance to

As part of the strategies to advance in studies related with in situ detection of the virus proteins, we attempted to promote the in vitro expression of the ORF 3, the

The in vitro MIC values obtained showed a high inhibitory activity of farnesol 181. against all tested strains, with no differences between clinical and

The protease inhibitors indinavir and ritonavir have shown in vitro and in vivo inhibitory effects against Candida albicans.. 11 Indinavir also has shown activity against the