• Nenhum resultado encontrado

Rev. Bras. Anestesiol. vol.66 número3

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2018

Share "Rev. Bras. Anestesiol. vol.66 número3"

Copied!
3
0
0

Texto

(1)

RevBrasAnestesiol.2016;66(3):321---323

REVISTA

BRASILEIRA

DE

ANESTESIOLOGIA

PublicaçãoOficialdaSociedadeBrasileiradeAnestesiologia www.sba.com.br

CLINICAL

INFORMATION

Aphonia

after

shoulder

surgery:

case

report

Carlos

Alberto

da

Silva

Soares

Moreno

,

Sara

Fonseca

HospitalSãoJoão,Porto,Portugal

Received8August2013;accepted19September2013 Availableonline23November2014

KEYWORDS Block;

Interscalenebrachial plexus;

Aphonia; I-Gel; Choking;

Recurrentlaryngeal nerve

Abstract Inthiscasereportwehighlighttheuniquenessofaphoniaas,tothebestofour knowl-edge,casesofaphoniarelatedtointerscalenebrachialplexusblock(IBPB)arenotdescribedin theliterature.AlthoughhoarsenessisacommoncomplicationofIBPB,aphoniaisnot. There-fore,wethinkitisimportanttopublicizethefirstcaseofaphoniaafterIBPB,whichmayhave arisenonlybecauseofarecurrentlaryngealnervechronicinjurycontralateraltotheIBPBsite. © 2014SociedadeBrasileirade Anestesiologia.Publishedby ElsevierEditoraLtda.Allrights reserved.

PALAVRAS-CHAVE Bloqueio;

Plexobraquial interescalênico; Afonia;

I-Gel;

Engasgamento; Nervolaríngeo recorrente

Afoniaapóscirurgiadoombro:relatodecaso

Resumo Relativamenteaesterelatodecasodestacamosasuasingularidade,umavezque nãoseencontramdescritosnaliteratura,tantoouquantoosautorespuderaminvestigar,casos deafoniaapósumaanestesiacombinadacombloqueiodoplexobraquialviainterescalénica (BPBI).Emboraarouquidãosejaumacomplicac¸ãofrequentedoBPBI,aafonianãooé.Desse modo,pensamosserimportantedaraconheceroprimeirocasodeafoniaapósoBPBI,quena opiniãodosautoressurgiuapenasporcausadeumalesãocrônicadonervolaríngeorecorrente contralateralaolocaldoBPBI.

©2014SociedadeBrasileira deAnestesiologia.PublicadoporElsevierEditoraLtda.Todosos direitosreservados.

Correspondingauthor.

E-mail:[email protected](C.A.S.S.Moreno).

Background

and

objective

Shouldersurgeryisthemainindicationoftheinterscalene brachialplexusblock(ISBPB).1Althoughsafeandeffective,

thistechniqueisnotfreeofcomplications.2---4

Currently,thereisagrowinginterestintheuseof ultra-soundguidanceforregionalanesthesiaproceduressuchas

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjane.2013.09.014

(2)

322 C.A.S.S.Moreno,S.Fonseca

peripheral nerve blocks(PNB),but itssuperiority to neu-rostimulationisstillcontroversial.5Recent studiessuggest

that ultrasound can improve the effectiveness of periph-eralnerveblockcomparedwithneurostimulation.However, thereisnoevidencethatitsusecandecreasethenumber ofcomplication,suchasnerveinjuryorsystemictoxicityof localanesthetics.5,6TheConcomitantuseofultrasoundand

neurostimulationisacommon,reliable,andvalidpractice forPNB.

Sincethe1990s,thesupraglotticairwaydevicesareoften usedforairwaymanagementinpatientsundergoinggeneral anesthesia.Itisasafedevice,althoughsomecomplications associatedwithitsusehavebeendescribed.7

Theaimofthisstudywastoanalyzethefirstcaseof apho-niadescribedinliterature,whichemergedaftercombined anesthesia(ISBPBandbalancedgeneralanesthesia[BGA])in shoulderarthroscopytocorrectrotatorcuffsyndrome.

Case

report

Female patient, 52 years old, 65kg; scheduled for right shoulder arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Personal his-tory of controlled hypertension medicated with losartan 50mgday−1, physical status ASA II (American Society of Anesthesiologists, ASA classification); no surgical history and/orrelevantanesthetics.Physicalexaminationand pre-operative tests(blood count,biochemistry, blood clotting tests,andelectrocardiogram)showednochanges.

Combined anesthesia was proposed: ISBPB under mild sedation and BGA. After obtaining informed consent, standard monitoring (electrocardiogram, pulse oximetry, noninvasive blood pressure) and supplemental oxygen (3Lmin−1)via nasal cannula,sedation withIV midazolam (2mg) and ISBPB were performed: Echoplex® Vygon

nee-dle 50mm 22G guided by ultrasound (Sonosite M-Turbo®)

and neurostimulation (Plexygon® 7501.31, Vygon). After

ultrasoundidentification,andthroughbrachialplexus neu-rostimulation(forearmmusclecontraction,motorresponse upto 0.36mA, pulse duration of 0.1ms, and 2Hz of fre-quency),infiltrationwasperformed withropivacaine0.5% (30mL),undervisualization.Sensoryblocklevel2andMBS 1(ModifiedBromageScale)wereobtainedafter20min.BGA was then performed: IV fentanyl 2␮gkg−1 and IV propo-fol2.5mgkg−1;thesupraglotticdeviceI-Gel4introduction was uneventful; maintenance performed with desflurane 6% in oxygen/air (40%/60%). Concomitant analgesia per-formed with IV paracetamol 1g and IV parecoxib 40mg. Surgerylasted80min.Therewerenoanestheticorsurgical complications.Emergencefromanesthesiaandremovalof I-Gel4wereuneventful.Transporttopost-anesthesiacare unit(PACU)wasperformedwiththepatientspontaneously breathing,withoutrespiratorydistress.

In thePACU, withthe patientfully awake, inability to makesoundsassociatedwithptosis,miosis,and enophthal-moswereobserved.Neurologicalexaminationrevealed no otherchanges,andtherewerenohemodynamicor respira-torychangestoo.Theinitialreversalofsymptomsoccurred twohoursafterarrivalinthePACU,butthehoarseness per-sisted.Thepatientwastransferredtotheorthopedicward sevenhoursafterISBPB,withMBS0andhoarseness.Onthe firstpostoperativeday(POD1),thepatientwasevaluated

bytheAcutePainFunctionalUnit(APFU),alreadyshowing completeclinicalreversalofneurologicaldisorders.During this consultation, a review of the clinical conditions pre-sentedinthefirsthoursaftersurgerywasperformed,with confirmationofnosoundtransmission/vocalizationandany other associatedneurological symptoms. The patientwas dischargedonPOD2.

Thefollow-upvisitwasconducted30daysafterdischarge intheAPFU,notingtheabsenceofneurological abnormal-ities and appropriate surgical recovery. A more detailed explorationofthepatient’shistoryoffrequentchokingwith saliva for more than10 years, whichwas associatedwith intermittenthoarsenesswasperformed.

Discussion

Tothebestofourknowledge,thereisnotacasesimilarto oursdescribedintheliterature.Aphonia(completeinability touttersounds)occursafterbilateralpalsyinabductionof vocalfolds.Theipsilateralrecurrentlaryngealnerve(RLN) is responsible for the motor innervation of the vocal fold muscles.UnilateralRLNinjuryparalyzestheipsilateralvocal fold,andtheclinicalsymptomsofdysphoniaorhoarseness appear.8IftheRLNparalysisorinjuryisbilateral,bothvocal

foldsareparalyzedandaphoniadevelops.

A surgical cause seems less likely, given the type and location of the surgery. Among other possible causes, we highlightthebilateralblockadeoftheRLNwithropivacaine, ipsilateralblockadeoftheRLNinthepresenceofaprior con-tralateralRLNinjury,larynxregiontrauma/injurycausedby thesupraglotticdeviceI-Gel4,andintraoperative neurolog-icalevent.

The neurological examination performed in the PACU after the diagnosis of aphonia did not reveal any other changes, only upper limb motor block on the ISBPB side. Weemphasizethepreservationofthemimicandface mus-cles, equally photoreactive and symmetric pupils, which makestheoccurrenceofanintraoperativeneurologicevent unlikely.

RegardingtheuseofI-Gel,themostfrequentlydescribed complications are oropharyngeal pain/inflammation and dysphagia.9Reneetal.reportedacaseofnerveinjurywith

itsintroduction.Themaininjurednerveisthelingual,which isonlyresponsibleforthetonguesensoryinnervation.10 In

literature,therearenocasesreportingaphoniaassociated withtheuseofthistypeofdevice.However,withtheuse of cuffed laryngeal mask, there arecase reports of tran-sienthoarsenessduetoRLNparalysis.Jonesetal.justified hoarsenessbycuffhyperinflation,withtemporary compres-sionof the RLNand vocal folds.11 Inomata etal.justified

transient hoarseness by vocal cord trauma after the LMA cuffhyperinflation,buttheyalsosuggestedthepossibility ofvocalfoldsinjurycausedbythelaryngoscopyperformed priortotherespectiveLMAplacement.12

(3)

Aphoniaaftershouldersurgery 323

anatomicalstructuresthatthelocalanestheticwouldhave tocrosstoreachthecontralateralRLNmakethishypothesis unlikely.We foundnoreportsintheliteratureabout local anestheticleakageaftercontralateralISBPB.

The clinical history of facility to choke and frequent intermittent hoarseness for more than ten years, which neverbotheredthepatient,suggeststhepresenceof unilat-eralparalysisofavocalfold,whichpreventstheeffective airway protective reflexes and enables the development offrequentintermittenthoarseness.The reversalofISBPB began approximately two hours after the predicted time for motor nerve fibers blockade and for the beginning of aphoniareversal.Thesedataallowaphoniajustificationas aresultofaright ISBPBinapatientwithpreviouschronic injuryofleftRLN.Theabsenceofrespiratorydifficultyraises thepossibilitythatthevocalcordparalysishasoccurredin abduction,andnotinadduction,whichallowedspontaneous ventilation.

Weconsiderthatthemostlikelycauseforthetransient aphoniainourpatientwastheRLNtemporaryblockadeby ropivacaine,in thepresenceofaunilateralpriorinjuryof contralateralRLN.

Conflicts

of

interest

Theauthorsdeclarenoconflictsofinterest.

References

1.WinnieAP. Interscalenebrachial plexus block.Anesth Analg. 1970;49:455---66.

2.UrmeyW,McDonaldM.Hemidiaphragmaticparesisduring inter-scalene brachialplexus block:effects ofpulmonary function andchestwallmechanics.AnesthAnalg.1992;74:352.

3.FujimuraN,NambaH,TsunodaK,etal.Effectof hemidiaphrag-matic paresis caused by interscalene brachial plexus block onbreathingpattern, chestwallmechanicsand bloodgases. AnesthAnalg.1995;81:962.

4.Joseph L, Seltzer M. Hoarseness and Horner’s syndrome afterinterscalenebrachialplexusblock.AnesthAnalg.1976; 56:587.

5.AbrahamsM,AzizMF,FuRF,etal.Ultrasoundguidance com-pared with electrical neurostimulation for peripheral nerve block: asystematic reviewand meta-analysis ofrandomized controlledtrials.BrJAnaesth.2009;102:408---17.

6.Hebl J. Ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia and the pre-vention of neurologic injury:fact or fiction? Anesthesiology. 2008;108:186---8.

7.GatwardJJ,CookTM,Seller C.Evaluationofthesize4i-gel airway in one hundred non-paralysed patients. Anaesthesia. 2008;63:1124---30.

8.Crumley R. Unilateral recurrentlaryngeal nerve paralysis.J Voice.1994;8:79---83.

9.AminiS,KhoshfetratM.Comparisonoftheintersurgicalsolus laryngealmaskandthei-gelsupralaryngealdevice. Anaesthe-sia.2010;65:805---9.

10.Renes SH, Zwart R, Scheffer GJ. Lingual nerve injury fol-lowing the use of an i-gel laryngeal mask. Anaesthesia. 2011;66:220---31.

11.JonesL,HegabA.Recurrentlaryngealnervepalsyafter laryn-gealmaskairwayinsertion.Anaesthesia.1996;51:171---2.

Referências

Documentos relacionados

i) A condutividade da matriz vítrea diminui com o aumento do tempo de tratamento térmico (Fig.. 241 pequena quantidade de cristais existentes na amostra já provoca um efeito

NÓS E OS OUTROS EM/COM QUEM HABITAMOS Na atual sociedade do conhecimento, pautada por encontros inesperados com as mudanças da era digital e cimentada por múltiplas incertezas,

Como um campo de investiga- ção, baseado nos fundamentos teóricos do feminismo e do ambienta- lismo, busca analisar por que as mulheres são tratadas como inferiores pelos homens e

Na hepatite B, as enzimas hepáticas têm valores menores tanto para quem toma quanto para os que não tomam café comparados ao vírus C, porém os dados foram estatisticamente

The probability of attending school four our group of interest in this region increased by 6.5 percentage points after the expansion of the Bolsa Família program in 2007 and

A redução da mobilização de Ca 2+ e o tratamento com BIS I não alteraram as curvas de letalidade, na presença ou ausência de ISO, mas provocaram significan- te aumento

Considering the challenge of intersectoriali- ty between sector policies and guaranteeing the right to health of adolescents deprived of their liberty, this study intends to

15 Disregarding such examples by claiming that they are not cases of a priori beliefs because they were revised is clearly question begging, and so not a sound move for an