http://store.seednews.inf.br
RESUlTS
Thinking about agricultural development in Brazil requires theoretical and spatial knowledge of three concepts that are inseparable but unmistakable: Land assignment, its occupation and use. These three concepts, which will be presented m detail, have been used in the work of territorial intelligence developed by Embrapa's team of Strategic Territorial lntelligence Group (GITE), which has a vast collection of spatial data to help synthesize and diagnose any region of Brazil.
Land Allocation
Over the last 25 years, the federal and state governments have legally allocated more than 37% of the national territory to conservation units, indigenous lands, quilombola communities and agrarian reform settlements. These numbers were stratified and categorized according to their destination, where the provision of these data being the responsibility of the competent bodies.
According to data collected in April 2017 from the Ministry of the Environment (MMA), 1,871 conservation units (PAs) occupied 154,433,280 ha, representing 18% of Brazil (including Environmental Protected Areas - APAs) or 13,1%, when we disregard the APAs. In Brazil, in most cases, PAs exclude human presence, while in Europe, Asia and the United States there
SEEDnewsespecial edition 2018
Nationalterritory showingconservationunits,
indigenouslands,quilombolacommunitiesand agrarianreform settlements area in 2017
Subtitle _ Conservation units
c::llndigenous Iands
_ Ruralsettlements
."Quilombolas" _ Military areas
DState boundaries
Proj~io)cóntuoe-"ltotft.· O....,.SlRGAS:!OOO fon!t'$ 100E:!'O10 UMA.!(:MOh) ftuw
meRASEPPlROIFP2'Ot6 CM>PIIlMSP J1If'IoeWO"~2017
may be agriculture, villages and various activities in national parks, without evoking the extensive tourist visitation.
According to the National Indian Foundation (FUNAI), there were 600 indigenous lands (TIs) demarcated until April 2017, which occupied approximately 14% of the national territory, equivalent to an area of 117,956,054 ha.
The International Union for Conservation of Nature (ruCN) designates asprotected areas the set of lands legally attributed both to conservation units and to traditional populations in Brazil, indigenous lands. In the national territory, protected areas total 257,257,508 ha in 2,471 territorial units covering an area equivalent to 30.2% of Brazil, which already discounts for overlaps. In comparison, the nine countries
09
12,184 areas
315,924,844 ha
37.1% of Brazil
1.871conservation units 600indigenous lands 9.349 settlements 296"quilombolas" 68 military areaswith more than 2.5 million square kilometers in the world dedicate, on average, 10% of their territories to protected areas. With more than 30% ofprotected areas (CUs + TIs), Brazil is, as it was, the world champion of environmental protection. In addition, protected areas of the country cover territories with great economic potential, which isnot the case in most other countries, where they cover inhospitable and desert areas (Australian Desert, China Desert, Siberia, Sonoran Desert and Mojave , Northern Alaska, Andean Relief, etc.).
The allocation of land extrapolates the exclusive concepts of protection. There are areas for land reform and quilombola areas. According to the National Institute ofColonization andAgrarian Reform (lNCRA), there are 9,349 agrarian settlements, of various natures and
RURAL LAND AREA IN BRAZIL
o 700 1.400
_-===-_=:::::Jlkm
~.J<IdwI"'2017
in several stages of implantation.
lhe settlements occupy 88,410,217 million hectares, or 10.4% of Brazil. According to the Secretariat for Policies for the Promotion of Racial Equality, the 268 quilombola areas already decreed until April 2017 occupied an area of 2.6 million hectares.
lhere are still more than 2,000 military areas belonging to the Army, Navy and Air Force, located in urban and rural areas.Of these, 68 are more significant, with public forests, and amount to 2,923,701 ha or 0.3% of Brazil, according to data from the Brazilian Forest Service.
lhe geocoded data collected and made available by the GITE indicate the existence of 12,184 areas legally assigned in the categories described above, occupying a total of 315,924,844 ha, with the overlaps
removed. lhis total area corresponds
to 37.1% of the country.
http://store.seednews.inf.br
lhe map of Brazil allows us to visualize the complexity and territorial fragmentation of the current situation, illustrating the size of the territorial and land management challenge generated by legalland allocation processes. While these initiatives seek to solve land and agrarian management problems and conflicts, they generate new challenges for territorial management and governance, especially regarding the future of the nation, whether for agricultural, logistic, national security and many other issues.
In addition to the areas already allocated, there are still additional requests to create or expand conservation units, indigenous lands,
agrarian settlements and quilombola areas. There is also a need toreconcile this territorial reality with the growth of cities, with the allocation of places for food and energy generation, for the establishment, passage and expansion of logistics,
10
transportation, supply systems, storage and mining.
Land occupation While attribution
is determined by governmental instances, land occupation must be thought for the part left over, where human and productive activities are structured. lhe agricultural activities are an interesting case, being a good example of how these concepts of allocation, occupation and land use have overlaps and intersections. Within settlements and quilombolas (legally attributed areas) there are agricultural activities as there are also in the 62.9% unattributed. lhese activities related to agriculture and livestock occupy these territories, but their uses are the most diverse.
From the analyzes carried out in the recently published data of the Rural Environmental Cadaster (CAR), it was possible to verify that approximately half of Brazil is occupied by agriculture and livestock. This means that the sum of the areas of Brazilian rural properties totals about 50% of the territory. It should be noted that rural activities occupy but do not use the whole area.This is because, withi~ the properties, there are several occupancy classes and categories, some of which are destined for environmental preservation, such as permanent preservation areas,
legal reserve areas, hill
tops, sloping areas,
water and, of course,
the forest surplus.
eGITE ~
~5a
..
~
...
_""'
.
~
.
PRESERVED VEGETATION AREA ON RURA
L LAN
DS
Land usage
Until recently, in
Brazil, it was impossible
to estimate with
considerable precision
the use ofland. Every 10
years, the IBGE Census
makes an exhaustive
survey of land use in
Brazilian agricultural
establishments, but it is declaratory information, recorded in a questionnaire, without a precise cartographic base.
Moreover, given the spatial, temporal
and technological dynamics of
Brazilian agriculture, some of these
data are quickly outdated.
o 700 1.400
_-
=
=
=
-_=
=:
J,
km
~SP •.lunh:ode2011
used and intended for preservation
by agriculture in rural properties
has ma de significant progress with
the advent of "CAR", which is one
of the most relevant fruits of the
new Forest Cede, Law12,651, dated
May 25th, 2012 as of April 30th,
2017, 4,104,247 of rural properties,
The possibility of updated
knowledge of the are as effectively
"
Regarding
natural vegetation,
Brazil protects and preserves
66.3% of its tenitory, being
one of the largest producers
of food in the world and still
champion of preservation.
Agriculture occupies only g%
of the country surface
.
"
SEEDnewespecial edition 2s 018
11
http://store.seednews.inf.brtotaling 407,999,690 hectares, were
registered in the National System
of Rural Environmental Cadaster,
SICAR,under the responsibility of
the Brazilian Forest Service (SFB)of
the Ministry of Environment (MMA).
Thanks to this enormous
database, managed and made
available by the Brazilian Forest
System, the perspective of a
qualification and quantification of
the areas destined to thepreservation
of the native vegetation within the
rural properties in cartographic bases
was opened for the first time. The
"CAR" of each rural property gathers
information from 18 categories
of land use and occupation. The
download of this data, spread over
5,570 municipalities, resulted in files
reaching 180 Gigabytes. With this
complex set of geocoded data (big
data), the GITEteam has developed a
clear methodology, produced accurate
OCCUPATION AND LAND USE
IN BRAZIL*
Source: SFB;SICAR;EMBRAPA; IBGE;
MMA;FUNAI;DNIT;ANA; MPOG.
and works as a public company to disseminate these results to general and specific audiences. In this way, the methods and results are available to the whole society at https://www. cnpm.embrapa.br /projetos/ car!.
results impressed The
positively on both the environment and farmers. A total of 176,806,937 hectares of preserved vegetation were found in rural properties,
equivalent to about 20.5% of the national territory (or about 22%
when subtracted from the states of Mato Grosso do Sul and Espírito Santo, which up to that time were not available on SiCARas it can be viewed onthe map.
Theseareas forthe preservation of native vegetation, registered by each rural property in SlCAR, also
represent a formaland administra tive http://store.seednews.inf.br DESTlNATED AREA FORNATIVE VEGETATION INSIDE FARMS
20.5%
13.1 %
c
Oc-0J9
.-
eu
1)0')
eu eu
-
e
>
eu
Q..~•
..
-O C'O.•..c
C'O ••••eu
O•
..
c
C'O Oc·-
0-._ C'O->
C'O •••c
eu
_C/) C/)eu
eu •
•.
aO.
"Cc
C'O 'Data obtained by GITE/Embrapa, may 2017.great importance, since it indicates that in these places the area willbe dedicated to the preservation of the environment.
In the case of Rio Grande do Sul, if we took all the properties registered and made them a single rural property, we would discover that 20%of the whole area of this rural property is dedicated to preservation (3,431,185 ha). This meets the legal
requirement for these properties, which requires that there be 20%of areas preserved by the sum of legal reserve and permanent preservation areas. This data can be seen in detail at https://www.cnpm.embrapa.br!
projetos/ car/estados/RS/rs .html. About 64% of the state area (17,335,427 ha) is occupied by agriculture. And this number will increase as more rural properties are
SEEDnewsespecial edition2018
NATIVE VEGETATION IN CONSERVATION UNITS NATIVE VEGETATION IN INDIAN LAND
13.8%
IMPROVEO PASTURES13.2%
CROPSANOCULJflVATEO NATlVE VEGETATION IN NOT USEO ANO FORESTRY REGISTEREO LANO
9.0%
18.9%
CITIES, INFRAESTRUCTURE ANO OTHERS3.5%
Others (3.5%
)
commitment to recovery and environmental conservation
undertaken by all farmers. Commitment duly registered and monitored. It is expressed in areas of permanent preservation, legal
reserves, vegetation and surplus remnants, which encompass several lacustrine and palustrine ecosystems, with their fiora, fauna and specific biodiversity. There are already more than 176 million hectares preserved throughout the country and the extension and functionalities should increase with the operationalization of the Environmental Regularization Program (PRA). Many of these preserved areas, mainly in the South and Southeast, are located in territories of highly intensified agriculture. This information is of
registered in theCAR.But it is already
possible to see how agriculture is
helping to preserve vegetation. The
maps of areas forthe preservation of
vegetation in rural properties show
a great coherepce in the patterns
of distribution, with connection
and continuity of native vegetation
formations along the hydrographic
network.
The "CAR" is a complex
instrument and a very vast database
and has opened a very wide range
of connections and possibilities for
research and analysis in territorial
intelligence. For example, it
becomes possible to cross data from
municipalities that have large coffee
production to find out how the issue
of environmental preservation in the
activity is being carried out. Other
examples could beof quantifying the
preservation in cuts of municipalities,
microregions or biomes. ln this
cross of biomes, for example, it was
verified that a great part of the rural
properties of the RSstate inserted in
Pampa did not classify their native
vegetation (native fields) as APP,RL
or as surplus vegetation, reducing the
preserved area of this biome, which is
conserved livestock for centuries.